Introduction

Air pollution is a mixture of solid particulate pollutants and gases in ambient air [27]. Among air pollutants, particulate matter (PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and ozone (O3) are the most commonly monitored pollutants [22]. Air pollution consistently ranks high among risk factors for death and disability worldwide, with almost 5 million deaths globally, i.e., nearly one in every ten deaths in 2017 according to the World Health Organization data [11]. Exposure to PM in long-term environmental air pollution causes ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lower respiratory infections, and, more recently, diabetes mellitus [11, 24]. Increasing amounts of air pollutants have major effects on the skin. The skin has a protective role against physical air pollutants and pro-oxidative chemicals. However, if exposure to high-level detrimental pollutants is prolonged or repetitive, negative effects on the skin can be observed [23]. Eczema generally presents as atopic dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis, and allergic contact dermatitis [18]. Previous studies have investigated the effects of internal and external factors on eczematous lesions, demonstrating that infections, food intake, genetic predisposition, stress, and inhalant allergens play a role in exacerbating eczematous lesions [2, 18]. Many studies investigating the effects of air pollutants and environmental factors, including relative humidity, wind speed, and temperature, on the exacerbation of eczematous rashes have shown the important role these factors play [1, 8, 10, 18]. Düzce is a province in Turkey where has a warm-temperate humid climate and intensive rainfall [12]. In addition, PM10 pollution is problematic owing to the local topography, types of heating, and industrial infrastructure [28].

This study aimed to investigate relative humidity, barometric pressure, air temperature, and air pollutant concentrations such as SO2 and PM10 to determine a relationship between these factors and the number of eczema-related outpatient clinic visits in Düzce.

Materials and methods

Air pollution and meteorological data

Meteorological data between January 1, 2013 and July 11, 2019 were collated. In the same period, air monitoring measurement parameters of the Turkish national air quality network (PM10, SO2, air temperature, air pressure, and relative humidity) were obtained from the network’s website (https://laboratory.cevre.gov.tr/Default.ltr.aspx).

Patient selection

Patients visiting dermatology weekday outpatient clinics between January 1, 2013 and July 11, 2019 were included in the study. Patient information located in the registration data system was accessed using the following ICD codes: L-20, L-25, and L-30. Patients who resided outside the province of Düzce were excluded from the study. Some residential areas in Düzce province use stoves for domestic heating; therefore, in the address registration information, patients living in these areas were excluded. Patients whose etiology had been determined during an examination and recorded in the patient information data set were excluded from the study.

All study participants provided informed consent, and the study design was approved by the Düzce University ethics review board (2019/132).

Statistical analysis

Appropriate descriptive statistics for all variables in the study were calculated. The proportion of missing data was 0.13% for SO2 air pollutant values. A moving average method was used to replace the missing data. First, a mixed-effects model (Poisson log linear link function and post hoc: sequential Bonferroni method) was created to examine the interaction effect of year and season on the number of daily outpatients with eczema without considering the effects of environmental factors. The relationships between air pollution and meteorological factors were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation coefficients. The effects of environmental stressors on health can occur several days post-exposure to a stressor, and the exposure to high levels of air pollution or extreme temperatures can affect health over a period of several days post-exposure [6]. Therefore, lag effects of air pollution and meteorological factors were evaluated using a distributed lag nonlinear model (DLNM) [5], and the relationship between the daily number of patients and environmental factors was estimated as daily lag and up to 5 days lag. Each air pollution factor was modeled both individually and in combination, and several models were created using different combinations, including the effects of meteorological factors. Given that the number of daily outpatients with eczema as a dependent variable in the model was very small, the predictions of the model were obtained by assuming that this variable had Poisson distribution. Distributed lag nonlinear models were created to cover both a single air pollution factor and two air pollution factors. The basic model was determined as follows:

$${Y}_{t} \sim \mathrm{poisson}\left(\mu \right)=\alpha +\beta {X}_{t,1}+cb\left({\mathrm{Cov}}_{t}, df\right)+\mathrm{ns}\left(\mathrm{time}, df/\mathrm{year}\right)+\mathrm{w},$$

where \({Y}_{t}\) represents the number of outpatients with eczema on day t, α is the intercept, β is the estimated parameter vector showing the effects of environmental factors, and \({X}_{t}\) shows the daily average air pollution (PM10 and SO2) concentration values accumulated from the current day (lag 0) to the five previous days (lag 5), or it shows the values of meteorological factors (relative humidity and pressure). In the basic model, temperature was considered a covariate, and the single and double effects of each meteorological factor were also included in the model. The effects of air pollution factors on the number of daily outpatient visits owing to eczema were examined. The “day” was included in the model as a categorical variable indicating the day of the week. The daily number of eczema-related outpatient visits was generally small; therefore, no additional statistical evaluations could be made according to gender. However, to test model stability, different degree of freedom (df) values (df 5–7) were considered, and sensitivity analysis was performed. Residual autocorrelation of the models was also undertaken. Akaike information criteria and null deviance and residual deviance criteria were used to determine the best fitting models. Relative risk (RR) test results showed the effect of each of these environmental factors on the daily number of patients in cases where air pollution factors had a 10 µg/m3 increase in the DLNM, a temperature increase of 1 °C, a 10% relative humidity increase, and a 1-hbar increase in pressure. The RR and 95% confidence interval (CI) values were calculated. SPSS 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R CRAN programming language were used for statistical analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Between January 1, 2013 and July 11, 2019, 27,549 patients with eczema who attended the dermatology outpatient clinic of Düzce University Faculty of Medicine were included in this study. Of these, 15,879 (57.6%) patients were female and 11,670 (42.4%) were male. The average daily number of eczema-related dermatology outpatient visits was 17.6 ± 7.2 (2–41).

Descriptive statistics concerning the number of daily outpatients with eczema, daily air pollution, and meteorological factors recorded between January 1, 2013 and July 11, 2019 are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of the number of daily outpatients with dermatitis, daily air pollution, and meteorological factors recorded between 1 January 2013 and 11 July 2019 in Duzce

The effect of year and season on the daily number of patients

When the number of daily outpatients with eczema according to years and seasons was examined using a mixed-effects model (LR-χ2 = 866.17, df = 26, p < 0.001), the interaction effect (year × season) showing the effect of both year and season combined was significant in relation to the number of daily outpatients with eczema (p < 0.001).

Distributed lag nonlinear models for the daily number of patients

When controlling the temperature factor included in the model as a covariate, i.e., after adjusting for the effects of temperature on air pollution factors, a 5-day lag (lag 0–lag 5) model showing the effect of each air pollution factor on the number of patients per day was used. Lag 0 represents the current day, and lag 5 represents the five previous days. Tables 2 and 3 show the RR and 95% CI values that indicated the effect of a 10-µg/m3 increase in air pollution factors and climate factors on the number of patients per day.

Table 2 After adjusting for temperature, RR, and 95% CI, indicating the effect of each 10 µg/m3 increase in air pollution factors for 5 lag days on the number of patients per day
Table 3 RR and 95% CI for total five lag days showing the effects of a 10% increase in relative humidity, a 1-hbar increase in pressure and a 1 °C increase in temperature on the number of daily outpatients

After adjusting for temperature, with an increase in PM10 values of 10 µg/m3, the numbers of daily outpatients on the previous day (lag 1) and on the five previous days (lag 5) increased 0.19% and 0.27%, respectively. A 10-µg/m3 increase in SO2 values did not have a statistically significant effect on the daily number of patients. With a 10% increase in relative humidity, the numbers of outpatients on the previous day and two days lag increased by 10.29% and 8.38%, respectively. With a 1-hbar increase in pressure values, the numbers of outpatients on the previous day and five previous days increased by 1.71% and 3.44%, respectively, but the number of outpatients on the three previous days decreased by 1.63%. Moreover, when the effect of temperature factors on the number of patients was examined without correction according to any environmental factors, a 1 °C increase in temperature showed a 4.04% decrease in the number of outpatients on the previous day; however, the number of outpatients increased by 3.59%.

Models created with each air pollution factor after adjusting for all meteorological factors over the total 5 days lag

Table 4 presents the RR and 95% CI values showing the effects of each air pollution factor on the number of daily outpatient visits for a total of five days lag, after adjusting for temperature or all meteorological factors. After adjusting for temperature, increases in PM10 levels and SO2 values of 10-µg/m3 resulted in 0.87% and 7.65% increases in the number of daily outpatient visits, respectively. After adjusting for all meteorological factors, a 10-µg/m3 increase in PM10 and SO2 values resulted in 0.93% and 3.97% increases in the number of outpatient visits, respectively.

Table 4 RR and 95% CI values obtained for a total of 5 delayed days from different model combinations created for each environmental factor&

In Fig. 1, a three-dimensional plot illustrates the effects of temperature and PM10 on the RR of eczema with a maximum 30 lag days (lag 30). A nonlinear polynomial relationship was observed between PM10 and RR, as was a polynomial increase in the RR value with increasing PM10.

Fig. 1
figure 1

3D graph showing the effects and changes of the 10 µg/m3 increase in PM10 on RR for 30 delayed days (lag 30)

After adjusting for temperature and SO2 values, the effect of a 10-µg/m3 increase in PM10 values on the number of daily outpatient visits was statistically significant over a total delay of five days. Moreover, after adjusting for temperature and PM10 values, the effect of a 10-µg/m3 increase in SO2 values on the daily number of outpatient visits was statistically significant, with a 5.34% increase in outpatient visits.

Models with two air pollution factors after adjusting for all meteorological factors over a total delay of 5 days

After adjusting for all meteorological factors and SO2 values, it was determined that a 10-µg/m3 increase in PM10 resulted in a 0.91% increase in the number of eczema-related outpatient visits over a total delay of five days. However, after adjusting for all meteorological factors and PM10 values, a 10-µg/m3 increase in SO2 values did not have a significant effect on the number of daily outpatient visits.

Discussion

In this study, relationships between environmental factors such as air pollutants, relative humidity, temperature, barometric pressure, and eczema-related outpatient visits were investigated using a DLNM. The skin is the outermost barrier in direct contact with various air pollutants. Prolonged and recurrent exposure to environmental stressors causes the development of various skin diseases and skin barrier function disruption when the normal defense potential of skin is exceeded [23].

Data from our study showed a 10% increase in the relative humidity value. Moreover, a 1-hbar increase in the pressure value was found to increase the daily number of outpatient visits when the temperature factor was controlled according to meteorological values. Our results showed that a 1 °C increase in temperature without correction for any environmental factors resulted in a decrease in the number of daily outpatient visits. There have been conflicting reports concerning the effect of relative humidity on eczema lesions. Suárez‐Varela et al. reported that as relative humidity levels increased, eczema lesions increased [26]. Silverberg et al. [25] and Li et al. [18] reported that as relative humidity levels increased, the frequency of visits decreased. Kantor et al. reported that indoor humidity reduced the prevalence of atopic dermatitis; however, the effect of outdoor humidity on the prevalence of atopic eczema remains controversial [13]. The results of our study support those of Suárez‐Varela et al. [26] Li et al. [18] and Goad et al. [7], showing that increased relative humidity and increased temperatures reduced the density of PM in the air. As air pressure values increase, PM concentrations in the air may increase, leading to an increase in hospital admissions owing to skin dryness, which is a characteristic clinical finding of eczema [7, 18]. The results of our study are consistent with those of previous studies that have shown that an increase in air pressure increased the frequency of hospital admissions. Furthermore, low air temperature negatively affects skin barrier functions and increases the risk of dermatitis [4]. In Northern European countries during late autumn–winter and early spring periods when temperature values are low, two studies have reported an increase in the frequency of patients with atopic eczema attending the outpatient clinic [9, 20]. In a study conducted involving 91,642 patients aged 0–17 years in the United States, an inverse relationship between air temperature and the number of patients presenting to the outpatient clinic for atopic eczema was reported [25]. A higher prevalence of irritant and allergic contact dermatitis was found in northern parts of Norway than that reported in a similar survey from southern Sweden. The high incidence of hand eczema was thought to be related to cold climatic conditions [14].

After adjusting for all meteorological factors, and when there was a 10-µg/m3 increase in PM10 and SO2 values in each model, relative humidity, air pressure, and temperature factors were found to change the frequency rate of hospital admissions, with positive effects on the number of daily outpatient visits noted. These results showed that PM10 and SO2 levels, which constitute air pollution components, exacerbate eczema lesions and lead to an increase in the number of hospital admissions. PM10 and SO2 components that cause air pollution differ from each other. SO2 is a highly reactive compound derived from the processing of sulfur-containing substances such as coal and crude oil. PM is a complex mixture of solid and/or liquid droplets suspended in gas. Large PM10 are between 2.5 and 10 µm in diameter, comprising components of soil, dust, and dusty emission from various industries [19]. In recent years, epidemiological studies have reported that environmental air pollution exacerbates many dermatological diseases, especially inflammatory skin diseases such as PM10-related acne [17], dermatitis [15, 16, 21, 29], and psoriasis [22]. High levels of PM10, defined as 20 µq/m3 per year and 50 µq/m3 per day according to the WHO criteria, will increase mortality and morbidity in terms of human health [17]. In this study, a daily increase of 10 µq/m3 led to an increase in PM10 values when all meteorological factors and SO2 were controlled, leading to an increase in the frequency of attendance at the dermatology outpatient clinic due to eczema. Neither meteorological factors nor 10 µq/m3 daily increases in SO2 values when PM10 was controlled for were associated with the frequency of attendance to the outpatient clinic. These results indicated that PM10 values were more important in the development of skin diseases. In different studies, effects of air pollution and climate factors on outpatient visits for eczema in single-factor lag models are shown in Table 5.

Table 5 In different studies, effects of air pollution and climate factors on outpatient visits for eczema, in single-factor lag models

One of the most common components of air pollution is PM. One study reported that metals in PM increase the risk of protein and DNA damage and damage in relation to mitochondria-regulated death pathways through apoptosis induction [3]. The skin is an important defense organ that acts as a barrier to the outside world, providing both physical and immunological protection against a variety of microbial, chemical, and physical factors. Therefore, various theories have been proposed to understand the passage of air pollution components through the epidermal barrier. Types of skin penetration include mechanical delivery, an intracellular pathway, a transcellular pathway, and a transfollicular pathway. The skin has numerous pores that are larger than PM in size; however, there is no direct evidence to show that PM can penetrate the skin regardless of its smaller size [15]. Exposure to air pollution-causing particles has an adverse effect on the skin through increasing the level of free radicals, inducing cutaneous inflammation, activating mechanisms linked to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (causing toxic effects due to air pollution), and altering the skin microflora. All these mechanisms result in increased levels of TNF-α, IL-8, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-1α in the skin. Increased inflammatory skin diseases have been observed at the end of this entire process [8, 19]. Exposure to environmental air pollution poses health challenges and increases the economic burden in relation to health expenditure.

This study had some limitations. Air pollution exposure was based on estimates. Due to a lack of certainty in terms of geographical addresses, home-specific exposure assessments could not be made. No data were available concerning socioeconomic factors and individual hobbies. The monitoring was restricted due to the number of observations made by the National Air Quality Monitoring Network stations.

Conclusions

The skin is the largest organ of the human body, and any factor affecting the health of the skin can affect the entire body. Our study findings showed that air pollution affects the incidence and prevalence of eczema. An increase in PM10 values was found to be significantly related to the number of outpatient clinic visits, and a temperature increase was found to have a protective effect on patients with eczema. Currently, knowledge concerning the effects of air pollution on skin remains limited. Future cohort studies are required to examine the short- and long-term effects of environmental air pollution on the skin.