Abstract
Prions cause infectious and fatal neurodegenerative diseases in mammals. Chronic wasting disease (CWD), a prion disease of cervids, spreads efficiently among wild and farmed animals. Potential transmission to humans of CWD is a growing concern due to its increasing prevalence. Here, we provide evidence for a zoonotic potential of CWD prions, and its probable signature using mice expressing human prion protein (PrP) as an infection model. Inoculation of these mice with deer CWD isolates resulted in atypical clinical manifestation with prion seeding activity and efficient transmissible infectivity in the brain and, remarkably, in feces, but without classical neuropathological or Western blot appearances of prion diseases. Intriguingly, the protease-resistant PrP in the brain resembled that found in a familial human prion disease and was transmissible upon second passage. Our results suggest that CWD might infect humans, although the transmission barrier is likely higher compared to zoonotic transmission of cattle prions. Notably, our data suggest a different clinical presentation, prion signature, and tissue tropism, which causes challenges for detection by current diagnostic assays. Furthermore, the presence of infectious prions in feces is concerning because if this occurs in humans, it is a source for human-to-human transmission. These findings have strong implications for public health and CWD management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Prions are the causative agents of transmissible and fatal neurodegenerative diseases of humans [e.g., Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD)] and animals (scrapie in sheep, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, and CWD in cervids) [17]. Prion diseases are characterized by the accumulation in the brain of the infectious prion protein, PrPSc, derived after a structural transition from its host-encoded, cellular isoform, PrPC [49]. CWD is the only prion disease known to affect both free-roaming and farmed animals. Cervid species naturally affected by CWD include white-tailed deer (WTD; Odocoileus virginianus), mule deer (O. hemionus), elk (Cervus canadensis), red deer (C. elaphus), moose (Alces alces sp.), and reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) [4]. As of today, it has been identified in 30 US states, with a prevalence as high as 40% in certain endemic areas [25], 4 Canadian provinces, South Korea, and 3 Northern European countries, Norway, Finland, and Sweden [4]. For most prion diseases, with the exception of scrapie and CWD, infectious prions are mostly confined to the central nervous system. In contrast, in cervids affected with CWD, infectivity has been found in the lymphatic system, salivary gland, intestinal tract, muscles, antler velvet, blood, urine, saliva, and feces [4], which have been demonstrated to be transmissible [57]. CWD prions are shed into the environment via bodily fluids and excreta. They bind to soil and are taken up by plants, making the environment infectious for decades to come [4, 48]. The persistence of CWD prions in the environment amplifies the already effective transmission within and between cervid species. Therefore, CWD is considered to be the most contagious prion disease with fast spreading and efficient horizontal transmission.
Zoonotic BSE (i.e., variant CJD; vCJD) provides undeniable evidence that animal prions can infect humans, resulting in distinct disease manifestation and strain properties [14]. Epidemiological studies in CWD endemic areas have neither indicated an increased incidence of CJD patients, nor unusual prion disease subtypes [8, 25, 28]. Numerous studies assessing the zoonotic potential of CWD, both in vitro and in vivo, overall conclude that the risk of CWD crossing the human barrier is low [5, 7, 28, 32, 34, 52, 53, 55, 56, 60, 61, 63]. However, prions are dynamic and evolving, and interspecies passage of CWD can result in prion adaptation to new host species. The existence of more than one CWD strain [4] may contribute to higher heterogeneity in disease and transmission profiles. In vitro studies using protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) demonstrated that PrPCWD can convert human PrPC into PrPCWD; however, this was achieved efficiently only after prion strain stabilization and adaptation in vitro or in vivo [6, 7]. Efficiency of PMCA conversion also depended on a human PrP polymorphism at position 129 [methionine (M)/valine (V)], affecting susceptibility to prion disease in humans [5, 18, 42], especially in the only to date known human prion disease (vCJD) acquired after animal prions (BSE) crossed the species barrier [14]. In contrast, most in vivo studies indicated that inoculation of different CWD prion isolates into transgenic mice overexpressing human PrPC with different genotypes at codon 129 did not result in disease [32, 52, 55, 56, 60, 63]. A recent study by Wang et al., showed that transgenic mice overexpressing human M129- and V129-PrPC are susceptible to in vitro-generated PrPCWD, with elk CWD used as a seed and human V129-PrPC used as a substrate in PMCA. In addition, in this study, PrPCWD could only convert V129-PrPC substrate in vitro, but not M129-PrPC [61].
Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) were found to be susceptible to intracerebral (i.c.) and oral CWD infection [6, 7, 36], while cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) have conflicting results. Race and collaborators have reported that the latter non-human primate model was not susceptible to CWD [50, 51, 53]; while a consortium study including our group reported an atypical phenotype, and positive real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) and PMCA assays in harvested tissues from macaques after challenge with CWD using different routes of inoculation (Czub S, PC, 2017). The human species barrier to CWD infection is presented as strong by most of the studies, yet these findings are still a matter of debate [4]. In the absence of effective management strategies, the prevalence of CWD, the affected geographical areas and the host species range of CWD are increasing, and with that, the potential for human exposure to CWD prions is also increasing. In addition, infectious prions have been found in skeletal muscle [1] and antler velvet [3] in infected cervids, raising yet more concerns about zoonotic transmission of CWD through venison consumption and/or application of cervid products in traditional medicines [4].
In this study, we evaluated the zoonotic potential of CWD using a transgenic mouse model overexpressing human M129-PrPC (tg650 [12]). We inoculated tg650 mice intracerebrally with two deer CWD isolates, Wisc-1 and 116AG [22, 23, 27, 29]. We demonstrate that this transgenic line was susceptible to infection with CWD prions and displayed a distinct leading clinical sign, an atypical PrPSc signature and unusual fecal shedding of infectious prions. Importantly, these prions generated by the human PrP transgenic mice were transmissible upon passage. Our results are the first evidence of a zoonotic risk of CWD when using one of the most common CWD strains, Wisc-1/CWD1 for infection. We demonstrated in a human transgenic mouse model that the species barrier for transmission of CWD to humans is not absolute. The fact that its signature was not typical raises the questions whether CWD would manifest in humans as a subclinical infection, whether it would arise through direct or indirect transmission including an intermediate host, or a silent to uncovered human-to-human transmission, and whether current detection techniques will be sufficient to unveil its presence.
Methods
Ethics statement
This study had the approval of the Canadian Human Ethics Board for the use of CJD isolates (protocol number REB18-0505), and strictly followed the guidelines of the Canadian Council for Animal Care. All experiments detailed in the study were performed in compliance with the University of Calgary Animal Care Committee under protocol number AC18-0047. Prior to inoculation and euthanasia, isoflurane was used as anesthetic at a concentration of 5% (flow rate of 0.8 L/min) for induction, and then lowered to 0.5–1% for maintenance of general anesthesia during the procedure.
Prion material
Prion isolates were prepared separately as 20% (w/v) brain homogenates in phosphate-buffered saline pH 7.4 (PBS; Life Technologies, Gibco) using the MP Biomedicals fast prep‐24 homogenizer (Fisher). Aliquots were stored at − 80 °C until further use. Homogenization and aliquoting of the CWD isolates was done in two different laboratories, and during handling, gloves were changed between CWD isolates to avoid any cross contamination. Wisc-1 deer isolate was obtained upon experimental infection of white-tailed deer of wild-type Prnp genotype (QQ95, GG96, and AA116) orally dosed with CWD inoculum from hunter harvested deer [31]. This isolate was characterized as Wisc-1 strain [2, 22, 23]. The 116AG isolate was a field isolate from an animal with a polymorphic Prnp genotype (QQ95, GG96, and AG116) provided by the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative (CWHC), Saskatoon, SK, Canada [27]. It was from a 5 year old wild male white-tailed deer that was reported to exhibit clinical signs (wasting syndrome) and was tested positive for CWD after its death in the field. Except for residue 116, no other polymorphisms were found in the Prnp gene of this animal [27]. As a positive control for Western blots, we used MM1-sCJD and MM2b-vCJD brain tissues kindly provided by Dr. Stéphane Haïk (Paris Brain Institute, France) that were handled in a separate laboratory.
Fecal homogenates were prepared according to a well-established protocol in our lab [15]. Briefly, fecal pellets collected from CWD-inoculated tg650 mice (between 600 and 750 dpi), and age-matched controls were weighed and prepared in fecal extraction buffer composed of 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.1), 130 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, 1 mM PMSF and 1× complete protease inhibitors (Roche) at a final concentration of 20% (w/v). Fecal pellets were homogenized in the MP Biomedicals fast prep‐24 homogenizer and placed on a rotary shaker for 1 h at room temperature, then centrifuged at 18,000×g for 5 min, supernatants were collected. Fecal homogenate (1 mL) was mixed with N-lauryl-sarcosine at a final concentration of 2% and incubated at 37 °C with constant shaking at 1400 rpm for 30 min. The samples were adjusted to 0.3% sodium phosphotungstic acid (NaPTA) by adding a stock solution containing 4% NaPTA and 170 mM magnesium chloride (MgCl2), pH 7.4, incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with constant shaking and centrifuged for 30 min at maximum speed (15,800×g) at room temperature. Pellets were washed using cell lysis buffer containing 0.1% N-lauryl-sarcosine, and then resuspended in 1/10 of the original sample volume in RT-QuIC dilution buffer.
Animal study
All animal transmissions in tg650 and bank vole models are summarized in a scheme (Supplementary Fig. 1, online resource). We used tg650 mice, a transgenic mouse line that overexpresses human PrPC (MM129) approximately sixfold [12]. The lifespan of these animals is about 2.5 years, and they are not known to develop any spontaneous prion disease [12, 26]. We intracerebrally (i.c.) inoculated ten 6–8-week-old tg650 female mice with 1% brain homogenates from CWD-positive white-tailed deer (Wisc-1 and 116AG), or a pool of 1% brain/spinal cord (SC) homogenates from first passage tg650-Wisc-1 (mouse #327) into the right parietal lobe using a 25-gauge disposable hypodermic needle. Only female mice were used to prevent serious fighting between male mice. Alongside the CWD-inoculated tg650 mice, we also had nine uninoculated tg650 age-matched controls. Strict guidelines were followed to avoid cross contamination between the CWD isolates during the inoculation procedure and throughout the course of the experiment. No human prion infected materials were handled in the animal facility where the inoculated tg650 mice were housed. We also inoculated bank voles expressing a methionine at position 109 of the Prnp gene [38, 39]. Two to three months old male and female bank voles were i.c. inoculated with a pool of 1% brain/SC homogenates (n = 6), or 10% fecal homogenates (n = 9) that were sonicated in 2-s burst of sonication (∼130 to 170 W; QSonica Q700 sonicator) followed by a rest time of 1-s for 8 min. Sonication was used to damage nucleic acids and inactivate bacteria and viruses with minimal effects on prion titers. For second passage a set of 4 bank voles was inoculated with brain homogenates from bank vole #3430. Inoculated animals were initially monitored once a week. Upon onset of clinical signs, in this particular and atypical case, myoclonus, they were monitored daily. At terminal stage of disease, clinical mice and bank voles were exhibiting rigid tail, rough coat, gait abnormalities, ataxia, kyphosis, and cycles of weight loss and gain. We defined animals with subtle clinical signs as those that developed some subtle and/or transient signs that did not progress during the course of the experiment; however, all of these animals had the myoclonus. Animals with terminal clinical signs were those with confirmatory prion signs that did progress and reached terminal stage of disease. At experimental endpoints, animals were anaesthetized and then euthanized by CO2 overdose. After perfusion of animals, brains were collected and either fixed in formalin or frozen at − 80 °C. Experimental termination endpoints were pre-determined for tg650 mice (> 900 dpi). One mouse (#330) was found dead at 213 dpi and, therefore, was excluded from the analyses of Wisc-1 inoculated tg650 mice. We also excluded three animals from the analyses of 116AG-inoculated tg650 mice, two that were found dead (#335 and #337) and one which was euthanized because of a humane endpoint (#334).
Neuropathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Fixed sagittal sections of brains from six CWD-inoculated animals (#323, #324, #326, #327, #328 and #329) and two of their age-matched counterparts (negative controls) were paraffin embedded. Serial sections of 5 μm thickness were cut and stained using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E; Leica) to evaluate spongiform changes. For IHC, for a first set of slides we used guanidine thiocyanate (GdnSCN) denaturation. Sagittal sections were pre-treated with high-pressure autoclaving (2.1 × 105 Pa) for 30 min in citric acid (10 mM), pH 6.0, at 121 °C, followed by treatment with 98% formic acid for 10 min and 4 M GdnSCN for 2 h at room temperature. For a second set of slides, we used proteinase K (PK) digestion instead of GdnSCN denaturation. The slides were treated with 98% formic acid for 10 min, digested using 4 μg/mL of PK for 5 min at 37 °C, followed by pre-treatment with high-pressure autoclaving (2.1 × 105 Pa) for 30 min in citric acid (10 mM), pH 6.0, at 121 °C. Abnormal PrP accumulation was examined using a commercially available ARK (Animal Research Kit)/HRP kit (DAKO) using the anti-PrP monoclonal antibody 12F10 (aa 145–155; 1:100; Cayman) for 30 min at 37 °C and sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Slides were scanned using the Olympus VS110-5S scanner and images were analyzed using OlyVIA software (Olympus). All images were treated in a similar manner.
PrPres Western blot detection
For PrP analysis in tg650 brains, brain homogenates (20%) prepared in 1X PBS from different animals, including negative controls, were mixed with an equal volume of 100 mmol/L Tris–HCl (pH 7.4)—2% sarkosyl for 30 min prior to PK (200 μg/mL; Roche) digestion for 1 h at 37 °C. The reactions were terminated by adding 1X pefabloc proteinase inhibitor (Roche). Samples were boiled in sample buffer at 100 °C for 10 min. For bank vole brain extracts, 20% brain homogenates in 100 mmol/L Tris–HCl (pH 7.4)—2% sarkosyl were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with PK at a final concentration of 25 or 50 µg/mL. Protease treatment was stopped by adding 1X pefabloc and an equal volume of isopropanol/butanol (1:1 vol/vol) was added to the samples, which were then centrifuged at 20,000×g for 10 min. The pellets were resuspended in denaturing sample buffer and heated for 10 min at 100 °C. Fifty μg of protein were loaded, unless otherwise stated and separated using precast 12% Bis–Tris gels (ThermoFisher), and then electrophoretically transferred to PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare Life). PVDF membranes were blocked for 1 h in PBS-Tween (0.1%) containing skim milk powder (5%) and probed using anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies Sha31 (aa 145–152; 1:15,000; Cayman), 12F10 (aa 145–155; 1:200; Cayman), and 9A2 (aa 102–104) and 12B2 (aa 93–97; 1:1000; Wageningen Bioveterinary Research) overnight at 4 °C. Washing steps were performed using 1X PBS-Tween 20 buffer followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at room temperature. A separate blot was probed using only horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody for 30 min at room temperature to assess the specificity of the bands detected with primary mAbs. Signals were developed using ECL-plus detection (Millipore). Images were acquired on X-ray films (Denville Scientific). For calculation of the glyco-form ratios, Image J software was used to quantify and determine the relative values of PrPres signals (n ≥ 4).
Preparation of recombinant PrP (rPrP) substrate
The mature form of mouse, human or bank vole (aa23-231; mouse numbering) PrP was cloned into pET41a expression vectors (EMD Biosciences) and expressed in E. coli Rosetta using the Express Autoinduction System (Novagen). Inclusion bodies were prepared using the Bug Buster reagent (Novagen) and solubilized in lysis buffer [guanidine-HCl 8 M (Sigma-Aldrich)], sodium phosphate 100 mM, Tris–HCl 10 mM, pH 8.0 (Sigma-Aldrich)) for 50 min at 23 °C and then centrifuged at 16,000×g for 5 min at 23 °C. Binding, refolding, and elution using an AKTA Explorer system has been described previously [30].
RT-QuIC assay
For brain, spinal cord, small intestine, colon, and fecal homogenates, real-time QuIC was performed as described previously [15, 27]. Briefly, reactions were set up in assay buffer containing 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.9; Sigma-Aldrich), 300 mM NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mM EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 μM Thioflavin T (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.1 mg/mL recombinant mouse, human, or bank vole PrP substrate as stated in the figure legends. Octuplicate reactions were seeded each time with 2 μL of serially diluted homogenates, starting from 10–1, from CWD-infected mice or bank voles. Tissue homogenates (seeds) were tenfold serially diluted in RT-QuIC seed dilution buffer (0.05% (w/v) SDS in 1× PBS). The plate was sealed with Nunc Amplification Tape (Nalge Nunc International) and placed in a BMG Labtech FLUOstar Omega fluorescence plate reader that was pre-heated to 42 °C for a total of 50 h, or with an additional step of substrate replacement after 25 h, with cycles of 1-min double orbital shaking (700 rpm) and 1-min resting throughout the assay time. For substrate replacement, cycling was stopped after 25 h and 90 μL of the reaction mixture were replaced with fresh assay buffer containing rPrP and cycling was continued up to the end. Thioflavin T fluorescence signals of each well were read and documented every 15 min, then the values of the relative fluorescence units (RFU) were plotted as the average of octuplicate reactions using GraphPad Prism (version 9) software. For each assay, corresponding tissue from an age-matched non-infected tg650 or non-infected bank vole was added as internal negative control. The threshold was calculated based on the average fluorescence values of negative control + 5 × SD. Up to three RT-QuIC independent experiments were performed for most of the runs.
Conformation stability assay
Guanidine denaturation was performed as described previously [27] with slight modifications. Briefly, 10% brain homogenates from bvWisc-1 and bank voles inoculated with Wisc-1-tg650 fecal homogenates (two to four sets of voles) were incubated with increasing concentrations (0–4 M) of guanidine-HCl for 1 h at 20 °C under gentle shaking (450 rpm). Samples were then digested using 30 μg/mL of PK for 1 h at 37 °C. The reaction of PK was stopped by adding 1X pefabloc proteinase inhibitor to each sample. The samples were subjected to Western blot analysis and relative values of PrPres signals were quantified using a digital imaging system (Alpha Innotech, FluoriChemQ), and plotted as a sigmoid curve using GraphPad Prism (version 7) software to determine the [Gdn.HCl]1/2 value.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism 9.0 software (GraphPad) was used to establish the heat map for the RT-QuIC assays. It was also used to draw the RT-QuIC graphs, quantification of glyco-form ratios, and to do the statistical analyses.
Results
To assess and understand the zoonotic potential of CWD, we transmitted CWD prions from deer, without prior adaptation through in vivo or in vitro amplification, to tg650 mice overexpressing homozygous human M129-PrPC [12] (humanized mice). We inoculated intracerebrally tg650 mice (n = 10 per group) with brain homogenates of CWD-positive white-tailed deer. To investigate potential differences in the ability of CWD strains to infect tg650 mice, two isolates harboring different strains of CWD were used, Wisc-1, a CWD strain derived from a white-tailed deer expressing the cervid wild-type PrP, or 116AG, an isolate from a white-tailed deer harboring a polymorphism at position 116 (A116G) and identified to contain a mixture of two co-existing strains both distinct from Wisc-1 prions [22, 23, 27, 29]. We also had a group of nine non-infected tg650 age-matched negative controls [623–934 days post-inoculation (dpi)]. The scheme in Supplementary Fig. 1 (online resource) summarizes transmissions and results detailed onwards.
Humanized mice are susceptible to CWD prions
In cervids affected with CWD, the clinical presentation is mainly that of a wasting syndrome. Clinical manifestations such as behavioral changes (e.g., depression, isolation from the herd), excessive salivation, polyuria and teeth grinding are also observed. However, in rodent models of prion disease, including CWD inoculated models, we usually anticipate neurological signs, such as ataxia, gait abnormalities, weakness, rigid tail, and kyphosis, and behavioral changes such as isolation, wasting, irresponsiveness, and weight loss.
We closely monitored tg650 CWD-inoculated mice, and their age-matched non-infected controls, for progressive signs of prion diseases. Starting at 365 ± 30 dpi, we observed that 93.75% of the mice, irrespective of the inoculum, developed myoclonus, as diagnosed by our veterinarian (see Supplementary Video 1, online resource), an unusual clinical manifestation not typically observed in rodent prion models. Clinical signs progressed, with some mice undergoing cycles of weight loss and (re)gain, and lastly drastic weight loss. Eventually, some animals developed typical signs of prion disease, such as rigid tail, kyphosis, hind-limb clasping, ataxia, paralysis, heavy breathing, irresponsiveness, and gait abnormalities (see Supplementary Video 2, and Supplementary Table 1, online resource). Mice were euthanized either at a terminal disease stage or at the experimental endpoint of > 900 dpi.
Animals with subtle clinical signs were identified as those that developed some subtle and/or transient signs that did not progress over the course of the experiment; however, all of these animals had myoclonus. Animals with terminal clinical signs were those with confirmatory prion signs that progressed and reached terminal stage of disease. Based on this standard, of the mice inoculated with Wisc-1 prions 77.7% were clinical, of which, 44.4% progressed with terminal clinical signs, and 33.3% developed subtle clinical signs (Supplementary Table 2, and Supplementary Fig. 2, online resource). Of the 116AG-inoculated mice, 71.5% developed progressive clinical signs, of these, 28.6% showed terminal clinical signs, and 42.9% presented with subtle clinical signs (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2, online resource). Age-matched non-infected control mice (n = 9) did not exhibit any behavioral or neurological signs and were healthy up to the experimental endpoints between 623 dpi and > 900 dpi (Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Video 3, online resource).
We used RT-QuIC assay, a highly sensitive in vitro conversion technique demonstrated to vie the sensitivity of animal bioassays [62], to detect the presence of PrP amyloid seeding activity in the brains, spinal cords, and spleens of CWD-inoculated tg650 mice.
The RT-QuIC results depicted in Fig. 1a show reactions seeded with brain homogenates and are representative of one assay for each tg650-inoculated mouse with Wisc-1. Each curve represents the average of 8 replicates for each tested dilution (10–1 to 10–6). In addition, to achieve a better sensitivity of detection, we included a substrate replacement step after 25 h reaction time (arrow shown in Fig. 1a), where 90% of the reaction mixture was replaced with fresh assay buffer containing recombinant PrP and the RT-QuIC run was carried on up to 60 h. This step improves sensitivity of detection of low level prion seeding activity in tissues and fluids [15, 16, 40]. Brain homogenates of age-matched non-infected control mice were also tested. For each RT-QuIC run, an age-matched negative control BH was used as internal negative control, and they were consistently negative (Fig. 1a, b, and Supplementary Fig. 3, online resource). Wisc-1 (Fig. 1b) and sCJD brain homogenates (Supplementary Fig. 4a, online resource) were used as positive controls. We considered a dilution to be positive when 50% or more of the replicates turned positive, inconclusive when less than 50% of the replicates were positive, and negative when none of the replicates turned positive.
RT-QuIC results are summarized in a heat map (Fig. 1b). Prion seeding activity was repeatedly detected in 77.7% of the brains of Wisc-1-inoculated mice in at least one of the six tested dilutions (Fig. 1b), while 22.2% (mice #326 and #327) had inconclusive results (Fig. 1b), probably due to very low levels of prion seeding activity at the detection limit in these mice. The RT-QuIC results did not always correlate with the clinical status of the animals at the time of euthanasia. In fact, mouse #327, an animal with terminal disease (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Video 2, online resource) had very poor seeding activity with only one replicate out of eight being positive for two dilutions (10–1 and 10–4) while all other dilutions were strictly negative (Fig. 1). In contrast, mouse #322 had strong positive seeding activity in two dilutions (10–1 and 10–2; Fig. 1) yet the mouse did not develop any prion signs throughout the course of the experiment (Supplementary Table 1, online resource).
Brains of all mice inoculated with the 116AG isolate were negative in RT-QuIC, regardless of the clinical state of the animals (Supplementary Table 1, online resource); however, we have shown previously that this isolate induces slower disease progression, longer survival and lower seeding activity compared to Wisc-1 in cervid PrP transgenic mice [27, 29]. None of the CWD inoculated mice, regardless of the inoculum, had seeding activity in the spinal cord and spleen.
Next, we performed Western blot analysis of brain homogenates digested with PK (200 µg/mL [10, 37]), a gold standard for the diagnosis of prion disease, to determine the presence of PK-resistant PrPSc (PrPres) in the brains of CWD-inoculated tg650 mice. We detected PrPres in the brain of a Wisc-1-inoculated tg650 mouse, #321 (Fig. 2). This mouse that was euthanized at 882 dpi upon reaching the terminal stage of disease, was the first one to show myoclonus (Supplementary Table 1, online resource) and had the highest levels of seeding activity in RT-QuIC up to a dilution of 10–6 (Fig. 1). This indicates correlation between the amount of seeding activity and PrPres signal detectable in Western blot. Remarkably, the PK-resistant PrPSc core presented as two fragments with estimated molecular weights of 12–13 and 7–8 kDa (Fig. 2). These fragments were detected by two anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies (mAb) that recognize epitopes of the central region of PrP, Sha31 (aa 145–152) and 12F10 (aa 145–155), and by a third mAb binding an N-terminal epitope, 9A2 (aa 102–104). Notably, N-terminal mAb 12B2 (aa 93–97) only detected the 12–13 kDa fragment, indicating an N-terminal cleavage of this atypical PrPSc at this site (Fig. 2). To rule out the possibility of a nonspecific signal, we performed a Western blot with the same samples mentioned above (Fig. 2) using only a secondary Ab to probe the immunoblot. The secondary Ab alone did not detect any of the PK-resistant fragments (Supplementary Fig. 5a, online resource), thus, validating the specificity of the truncated PrPres fragments found in the brain of mouse #321 (Fig. 2).
Consistent with the results found in RT-QuIC, mice inoculated with 116AG isolate were all negative for PrPres on Western blot (Supplementary Fig. 5b, online resource).
We performed neuropathological analyses to assess spongiosis and abnormal PrP deposition, which are undeniable hallmarks to diagnose prion diseases. First, we analyzed spongiform lesions in the gray matter of Wisc-1-inoculated tg650 mice and their age-matched negative controls. No difference in spongiform degeneration was observed between CWD inoculated animals and negative controls (data not shown). At this stage, CWD-inoculated and non-inoculated tg650 mice were old and vacuolar changes were present equally in their brains due to natural aging process. Next, we performed immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) of the brain tissues from Wisc-1-inoculated tg650 mice to detect disease-associated PrP deposits. Age-matched negative controls were used to set a baseline of normal PrP staining and determine non-disease-associated PrP aggregates. Brain tissues were stained with mAb 12F10 using two different staining protocols with either PK digestion or guanidine thiocyanate denaturation (Fig. 3), and we only considered a sample positive if abnormal PrP deposits were detected with both protocols. IHC revealed abnormal PrP deposits mainly located in the thalamus, hypothalamus, and the midbrain/pons areas of one (mouse #328) out of the six Wisc-1-inoculated mice that were tested (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 6, online resource). PrP deposits showed granular morphology surrounding the cells in these areas. The pericellular staining observed in circumscribed areas of mouse #328 is different from the typical PrP-deposits seen in prion diseases, such as synaptic or plaque-like deposits. Mouse #328 was euthanized at 934 dpi with subtle clinical signs (Supplementary Table 1, online resource). It showed strong seeding activity in RT-QuIC (Fig. 1) but was negative for PrPres in Western blot (Fig. 2). As expected, age-matched controls were negative for abnormal PrP deposits (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 7, online resource). The IHC protocol with PK digestion showed a stronger background compared to the one with guanidine denaturation. To ascertain that the background staining is different from the actual abnormal PrP staining observed in the thalamus, hypothalamus and midbrain/pons areas, we have shown in Supplementary Fig. 6 (online resource) all nine studied brain regions of mouse #328. While the background is present equally in all different regions, the specific pericellular PrP staining is present only in the thalamus, hypothalamus and midbrain/pons areas and is absent in all other brain regions (Supplementary Fig. 6, online resource).
To assess infectivity and transmissibility of CWD prions in humanized mice (hCWD), we performed second passage using brain/spinal cord homogenates from mouse #327, the first mouse euthanized with terminal clinical disease, to bank voles (n = 6) and tg650 mice (n = 5). The different bioassays are still ongoing, but to date, transmission of mouse #327 induced terminal prion disease at 441 dpi in one bank vole (#3054) exhibiting tremor, ataxia, kyphosis, gait abnormalities, and rigid tail (see Supplementary Video 4, online resource). Another bank vole (#3053) died due to malocclusion at 293 dpi, yet it was monitored prior to its death because of clinical signs of transient kyphosis and gait abnormalities (dragging its left hind paw). Brain homogenates of both bank voles tested in RT-QuIC showed positive seeding activity in the brain (Supplementary Fig. 8a and b, online resource). However, none of the bank voles showed PrPres signal in their brain homogenates in Western blot.
Strikingly, second passage in tg650 mice of the brain/spinal cord homogenate pool resulted to date in terminal prion disease at 504 dpi in one mouse (#3063). This animal exhibited myoclonus at 11 months post-inoculation, followed by rigid tail, rough coat, ataxia and cycles of weight loss and gain. Western blot analysis of PK-digested (200 µg/mL) brain homogenates revealed atypical PrPres fragments (Fig. 4), resembling those of Wisc-1-inoculated tg650 mouse #321 (Fig. 2) in molecular weights and N-terminal cleavage site. These results demonstrate the presence of transmissible prion infectivity (hCWD) in the CNS of terminally sick tg650 mouse #327, despite the absence of detectable seeding activity in RT-QuIC (Fig. 1), PrPres in Western blot (Fig. 2), and abnormal PrP deposits in IHC (Supplementary Fig. 7, online resource).
CWD inoculated humanized mice shed infectious prions in feces
CWD prions are excreted in feces of infected, preclinical cervids [15, 57, 58]. Therefore, we collected feces from symptomatic and asymptomatic Wisc-1 or 116AG-inoculated tg650 mice, as well as their age-matched controls, between 600 and 750 dpi. We analyzed fecal homogenates by RT-QuIC. We used mouse recombinant PrP (rPrP) as a substrate and, as for the brain homogenates, substrate replacement for enhanced sensitivity [15, 16]. To verify whether fecal contents may contain inhibitors of amyloid formation we performed spiking experiments. We used fecal homogenates from age-matched non-inoculated controls to spike with sCJD brain homogenates as additional positive control (Supplementary Fig. 4b, online resource). Remarkably, 50% of the mice showed positive seeding activity in some replicates and dilutions (Supplementary Fig. 9a, online resource). Wisc-1-inoculated mouse #327 had consistently high levels of seeding activity with 75–100% positive replicates, up to a dilution of 10–3 (Fig. 5). We confirmed these results using human rPrP (Supplementary Fig. 9b, online resource).
To validate the presence of infectious prions in fecal homogenates, we intracerebrally inoculated bank voles (n = 9) and tg650 mice (n = 10) with 10% sonicated fecal homogenates from mouse #327 (summarized in Supplementary Fig. 1, online resource). Fecal homogenate inoculation to tg650 mice caused, so far, prion disease in 50% of the inoculated mice with the bioassay still ongoing. The mice presented with myoclonus at an early stage of the course of the experiment, followed by cycles of weight loss and gain, and finally ataxia. These mice were euthanized upon reaching terminal stage of the disease, between 534 and 630 dpi. However, analyses of brain homogenates from these mice by Western blot were negative for PK-resistant PrPSc. To date, fecal homogenate inoculation resulted in prion disease in bank voles (Fig. 6a; black line), with varying survival times (198–531 dpi) and with an attack rate of 66.6% (6/9 voles). Most of the euthanized voles presented subtle clinical signs (5/6), with ataxia as a predominant sign and were euthanized because of excessive weight loss. One bank vole (#3430) presented with progressive weight loss, kyphosis, ataxia, gait abnormalities and was euthanized upon reaching terminal disease stage at 241 dpi (see Supplementary Video 5, online resource). In all tested brain homogenates from bank voles inoculated with Wisc-1-tg650 fecal homogenates, seeding activity was detectable by RT-QuIC (Fig. 7a–c). In addition to the high levels of seeding activity found in the brain homogenates of bank vole #3430 (Fig. 7c), spinal cord homogenates from this animal also showed strong seeding activity (Fig. 7d).
Next, we performed Western blot analysis of PK-digested (50 µg/mL) brain and spinal cord homogenates from bank vole #3430. We detected a typical three banding pattern-PrPres signal in both tissues (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 10a, online resource).
Remarkably, analyses of small intestine and colon homogenates of bank vole #3430 by RT-QuIC revealed positive seeding activity (Fig. 7e, f, respectively). Small intestine homogenates displayed stronger seeding activity up to a dilution of 10–5 compared to colon homogenate, possibly due to the presence of inhibitory components [15] in the colon or generally lower levels of prion seeding activity. However, after PK digestion, none of these tissues was positive for PrPres in Western blot. Spleen homogenates of fecal homogenate-inoculated bank voles were negative in both Western blot and RT-QuIC.
Next, to validate the transmissibility of prions present in bank voles inoculated with Wisc-1-tg650 fecal homogenates, we performed a second passage of brain homogenates from bank vole #3430 into the same host (n = 4). Second passage resulted in a complete attack rate (Fig. 6a; purple line), and all inoculated bank voles succumbed to terminal prion disease. The decrease in survival time upon second passage (average of 137 ± 3 dpi; Fig. 6a; purple line) illustrates an adaptation of these prions to their new host. Western blot analyses of samples from second passage showed the presence of a three banding PrPres pattern in the brain and spinal cord homogenates of these animals (Fig. 6b). As a negative control, we also inoculated bank voles with fecal homogenates of tg650 non-inoculated mice. One of the voles was euthanized at 550 dpi to test for seeding activity by RT-QuIC, and it was found negative. To date (> 600 dpi), the remaining bank voles in this control group are still healthy and not displaying any signs.
Next, we wanted to compare PK-resistant PrPSc biochemical signature in brain homogenates of bank voles inoculated with Wisc-1-tg650 fecal homogenates, Wisc-1 original deer isolate, and Wisc-1 inoculated in bank voles [29] (bvWisc-1; 1st and 2nd passage). Western blot analyses showed that the PrPres signal in brain homogenates of bank voles inoculated with Wisc-1-tg650 fecal homogenates (Fig. 6b, 8a and Supplementary Fig. 10a, online resource) differed from the PrPres signal in brain homogenates of bvWisc-1 (Fig. 8a and Supplementary Fig. 10a, online resource). The unglycosylated PrPres band of bvWisc-1 migrates at an approximate molecular weight of 20 kDa, different from that of the Wisc-1 original deer isolate (18–19 kDa; Fig. 8a and [29]). Interestingly, unglycosylated PrPres in brain and spinal cord homogenates from bank vole #3430 inoculated with Wisc-1-tg650 fecal homogenates migrated at 18–19 kDa (Fig. 6b, 8a and Supplementary Fig. 10a, online resource) resembling that of the Wisc-1 original deer isolate (Fig. 8a). When we quantified the signal of the di-, mono-, and unglycosylated bands (Fig. 8b and Supplementary Fig. 10b, online resource), we found that bvWisc-1 presented with a predominant di-glycosylated band and a non-detectable unglycosylated band, compared to Wisc-1 deer isolate and bank voles inoculated with Wisc-1-tg650 fecal homogenates in 1st and 2nd passage (Fig. 8b and Supplementary Fig. 10b, online resource). The PrPres signal intensity in bank vole #3430 was stronger compared to that of bvWisc-1, considering that PK digestion was performed at different concentrations, 25 µg/mL for bvWisc-1 compared to 50 µg/mL for bank vole #3430, and different volumes were applied for Western blot analysis, with 20 times higher volume loaded for bvWisc-1 compared to bank vole #3430 (Fig. 8a and Supplementary Fig. 10a, online resource). To further ascertain the difference between bvWisc-1 and prions from bank voles inoculated with Wisc-1-tg650 fecal homogenates, we compared their conformational stability using guanidine hydrochloride (Gdn.HCl) denaturation. The concentration of Gdn.HCl necessary to unfold 50% of the PrPSc ([Gdn.HCl]1/2) of bvWisc-1 prions was significantly higher than that of PrPSc of bank voles inoculated with Wisc-1-tg650 fecal homogenates ([2 M] vs [1.25 M], respectively). These results revealed a significantly higher conformational stability of bvWisc-1 PrPSc (Fig. 8c). These data demonstrate that humanized tg650 mice inoculated with CWD prions shed prion infectivity in feces able to generate transmissible PrPSc in bank voles distinct from those generated by inoculation of the Wisc-1 deer isolate directly to bank voles.
Discussion
Our findings strongly suggest that CWD should be regarded as an actual public health risk. Here, we use humanized mice to show that CWD prions can cross the species barrier to humans, and remarkably, infectious prions can be excreted in feces.
Many factors have to be taken into account for prions to be able to cross the species barrier. Notably, the homology between the host PrP primary structure and the donor PrPSc plays a crucial role in species barrier [9, 13, 21, 59]. In addition, the existence of different CWD strains and the impact of the Prnp polymorphism, the extensive incubation period, and the atypical clinical presentation should be considered when investigating the risk of CWD. Determining that CWD poses a significant risk to human health is of a crucial importance to prevent a public health and economic crisis similar—if not greater—to that of BSE transmission to humans (i.e., vCJD) because CWD not only affects farmed but also free-ranging cervids and therefore cannot be controlled under the same circumstances that BSE in cattle was controlled.
Several studies have evaluated the susceptibility of humans to CWD [41]. Most in vitro studies had found that CWD prions are capable to convert human PrPC, however, either the efficiency of the conversion was low or relied on protein modifications by denaturation [5,6,7, 35, 47]. RT-QuIC assay showed that PrPCWD can seed the conversion of human recombinant PrP, however, PrPBSE did not seed it making the veracity of these results questionable [19]. Transgenic mouse models overexpressing the human prion protein have been extensively used to assess the transmission of various human prions in vivo, thus, they are also used as a model to test the zoonotic potential of prions from other species such as cervids (CWD) [32, 33, 52, 55, 56, 60, 61, 63]. Different transgenic lines with different polymorphism at residue 129 (M or V), expressing human PrPC at different expression levels, and in variable tissues (because of the transgene construct), were used in these studies, that were infected with different sources of CWD prions.
CWD transmission to humanized mice was assessed in all these studies by monitoring the clinical signs, examining the brain for neuropathology associated with prion disease, and IHC staining for PrP deposits. Brains were also analyzed by Western blot after PK digestion for detection of PrPres. Wilson and coworkers used an antigen immunoassay, to screen for PrPCWD [63], and Race et al. used RT-QuIC to assess the PrP amyloid formation in the brain of CWD inoculated humanized mice [52]. In three of the in vivo studies [32, 52, 63], clinical signs were observed in a relatively small number of CWD inoculated mice. Race et al. showed positive seeding activity in the brains of very few suspect animals, however, these results were inconsistent, and the authors questioned their significance [52]. Prion disease could not be detected in any of the other studies. As RT-QuIC assay was not available at the time of other reports [25, 32, 55, 56], they might have missed subclinical manifestations in their CWD-inoculated humanized mice. In addition, except for one study where the mice were kept up to 798 dpi [52], in most of the studies the experiments were terminated between 500 and 600 dpi. In our study, tg650 mice were kept for up to > 900 dpi, which is at least + 15% of the survival compared to the longest study. This could be a significant asset to this line when it comes to human prion diseases with a very prolonged incubation period.
In our study, inconclusive or negative seeding activity observed in 22.2% of Wisc-1-inoculated tg650 mice even with the substrate replacement step, regardless of the fact that mouse #327 was clinically sick (see Supplementary video 2, online resource) could be explained by low levels of prions in the brains of these mice. Nevertheless, prion infectivity was present and transmissible (mouse #327 → #3063), which is the most relevant criterion to demonstrate the presence of prions in case other assays provide inconclusive results. The modified RT-QuIC protocol with substrate replacement used here allowed us to ensure the availability of rPrP substrate for a longer period of time to enable the detection of low levels of prion seeding activity that would have been missed otherwise. Positive seeding activity observed in the brain of 77.7% of Wisc-1-tg650 inoculated mice was consistent and reproducible, however, one concern was that these results are the product of remaining inoculum as reported by Martin et al. [37], or a combination of both de novo generated PrPCWD in these mice, with regards to our results, and remnant inoculum. Nevertheless, our results are in disfavor of a scenario involving a remnant inoculum alone. In fact, transmission of brain homogenates from knockout mice with remaining sCJD inoculum generated prion disease in tg650 mice that was undistinguishable from that generated by sCJD inoculation of these mice. In our case, transmission of Wisc-1-CWD to tg650 mice resulted in clinical disease, and transmission of hCWD occult prions (mouse #327) that were transmissible upon second passage exposing an atypical PrPres pattern (mouse #3063) similar to that detected in first passage (mouse #321). The presence of infectious prions shed in feces is one argument in favor of the existence of de novo generated PrPSc in these mice. Another argument is the distinct biochemical signature of PrPSc found in bank voles inoculated with Wisc-1-tg650 fecal homogenates compared to bvWisc-1 prions. In fact, the differences in the migration profile of the unglycosylated band (Fig. 8a), the glyco-form ratio (Fig. 8b and Supplementary Fig. 10, online resource), and the conformational stability (Fig. 8c), are all strong indicators of distinct prion conformers, and compelling arguments conflicting with a possibility of remnant or spilled Wisc-1 inoculum in tg650 mice. This implicates that prions generated following Wisc-1 inoculation in tg650 mice underwent a modification governed by the presence of the human PRNP sequence. The recent study by Wang et al. claiming susceptibility of humanized mice to CWD failed to transmit the original elk isolate to the mice, rather, they generated PrPCWD by PMCA using V129 PrPC as substrate [61]. The study showed that CWD prions only converted V129-PrPC but not M129-PrPC, somehow contradicting previous reports demonstrating that CWD also converted M129-PrPC [47].
Our results indicate that if CWD crosses the species-barrier to humans, it is unlikely to resemble the most common forms of human prion diseases with respect to clinical signs, tissue tropism and PrPSc signature. For instance, PrPSc in variable protease-sensitive prionopathy (VPSPr), a sporadic form of human prion disease, and in the genetic form Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker syndrome (GSS) is defined by an atypical PK-resistant PrPSc fragment that is non-glycosylated and truncated at both C- and N-termini, with a molecular weight between 6 and 8 kDa [24, 44,45,46]. These biochemical features are unique and distinctive from PrPSc (PrP27-30) found in most other human or animal prion disease. The atypical PrPSc signature detected in brain homogenate of tg650 mice #321 (1st passage) and #3063 (2nd passage), and the 7–8 kDa fragment (Figs. 2, 4) are very similar to that of GSS, both in terms of migration profile and the N-terminal cleavage site.
CWD in humans might remain subclinical but with PrPSc deposits in the brain with an unusual morphology that does not resemble the patterns usually seen in different prion diseases (e.g., mouse #328; Fig. 3), clinical with untraceable abnormal PrP (e.g., mouse #327) but still transmissible and uncovered upon subsequent passage (e.g., mouse #3063; Fig. 4), or prions have other reservoirs than the usual ones, hence the presence of infectivity in feces (e.g., mouse #327) suggesting a potential for human-to-human transmission and a real iatrogenic risk that might be unrecognizable. Here, humanized mice inoculated with CWD deer isolates had an atypical onset of the disease with myoclonus (93.75%), before presenting typical clinical signs, generating prions that presented with either atypical biochemical signature (#321 and #3063), shed in feces (#327), or were undetectable by the classical detection methods. The fact that we could not establish a strong correlation between disease manifestation in tg650 mice inoculated with Wisc-1- or 116AG-CWD and the presence of abnormal PrP (Western blot, IHC or RT-QuIC) might be explained by the presence of heterogeneous prions in the brains of infected mice with different seeding properties in vitro. Indeed, such heterogeneity and distinct seeding activities and infectivity of abnormal PrP fragments was observed in VPSPr cases [20, 43]. We could not establish a correlation between the presence of PrPSc deposits in mouse #328 and the absence of resistant PrP in Western blot even though prions present in the brain of this animal seeded the conversion of rPrP substrate very well (Fig. 1). Mouse #321 was not available for IHC; therefore, we cannot draw a conclusion about abnormal PrP deposits in the brain of this animal, but we can conclude that there is a correlation between level of prion seeding activity (Fig. 1) and the detection of atypical PrPres fragments (Fig. 2) present in the brain of this animal. We can only speculate that transmission of Wisc-1 to tg650 mice generated prions with characteristics that render them less prone to be unveiled with conventional methods. However, 77.7% of these mice showed prion seeding activity despite the absence of PK-resistant PrPSc for most of them, suggesting that protease-sensitive prions could be involved in these transmissions like it was shown in human prion diseases [54]. Further analyses such as conformation-dependent immunoassay [54] and in vivo sub-passages will be required to resolve these questions.
The finding that infectious PrPSc was shed in fecal material of CWD-infected humanized mice and induced clinical disease, different tropism, and typical three banding pattern-PrPres in bank voles that is transmissible upon second passage is highly concerning for public health. The fact that this biochemical signature in bank voles resembles that of the Wisc-1 original deer isolate and is different from that of bvWisc-1, in the migration profile and the glyco-form-ratio, is valid evidence that these results are not a product of contamination in our study. If CWD in humans is found to be contagious and transmissible among humans, as it is in cervids [57], the spread of the disease within humans might become endemic. In contrast to bank voles inoculated with fecal homogenates from mouse #327, so far, we could not detect a PK-resistant PrPSc fragment in the brain homogenates of fecal homogenate-inoculated tg650 mice. The presence of PrPres in these mice will allow us to determine if the molecular signature of hCWD prions from the brain (mouse #321 and #3063) vs feces are the same. Previously, Beringue et al. found that extraneural prions, compared to neural prions, helped more to overcome the species barrier to foreign prions, in addition, different strain types emerged from such serial transmission [11]. Our data also suggest that prions found in the periphery may hold higher zoonotic potential than prions found in neural tissues. In fact, upon second passage, 50% of the tg650 mice inoculated with fecal homogenates from mouse #327 had succumbed with terminal disease compared to only 20% of brain/spinal cord homogenates inoculated-tg650 mice suggesting that hCWD prions found in feces transmit disease more efficiently. Our results also suggest that epidemiological studies [25] may have missed subclinical and atypical infections that are/might be transmissible, undetected by the gold standard tests, i.e., Western blot, ELISA, and IHC.
Ideally, an oral inoculation of mice with CWD prions would have mimicked best the natural route of exposure to acquired prion diseases like CWD. However, in our case, an oral inoculation would have been impossible considering the lifespan of the rodent models. It took us an extended amount of time, over two years and a half, to have a better idea of the extent of CWD transmission in the tg650 model, even with intracerebral inoculation, usually the fastest way to induce prion disease in a rodent model. Taking this into consideration, our study is the strongest proof-of-principle that CWD might be transmissible to humans. The overall risk for zoonotic transmission of CWD is likely lower than that for BSE; however, rather than predicting the absolute zoonotic risk for CWD, our study indicates the possibility of atypical features in humans. Furthermore, our findings provide striking insights into how CWD might manifest in humans and the impact it may have on human health. We have used Wisc-1/CWD1, one of the most common CWD strains, notably white-tailed deer prions, which have been shown to be more prone to generate human prions in vitro [47]. This implies a high risk of exposure to this strain, e.g., through consumption or handling of infected carcasses, in contrast to rarer CWD strains, and therefore, an actual risk for human health. Fecal shedding of infectious prions, if it occurs in humans, is particularly concerning because of potential human-to-human transmission and adaptation of hCWD. Overall, our findings suggest that CWD surveillance in humans should encompass a wider spectrum of tissues/organs tested and include new criteria in the diagnosis of potential patients.
References
Angers RC, Browning SR, Seward TS, Sigurdson CJ, Miller MW, Hoover EA et al (2006) Prions in skeletal muscles of deer with chronic wasting disease. Science 311:1117. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1122864
Angers RC, Kang HE, Napier D, Browning S, Seward T, Mathiason C et al (2010) Prion strain mutation determined by prion protein conformational compatibility and primary structure. Science 328:1154–1158. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187107
Angers RC, Seward TS, Napier D, Green M, Hoover E, Spraker T et al (2009) Chronic wasting disease prions in elk antler velvet. Emerg Infect Dis 15:696–703. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1505.081458
Arifin MI, Hannaoui S, Chang SC, Thapa S, Schatzl HM, Gilch S (2021) Cervid prion protein polymorphisms: role in chronic wasting disease pathogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052271
Barria MA, Balachandran A, Morita M, Kitamoto T, Barron R, Manson J et al (2014) Molecular barriers to zoonotic transmission of prions. Emerg Infect Dis 20:88–97. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2001.130858
Barria MA, Libori A, Mitchell G, Head MW (2018) Susceptibility of human prion protein to conversion by chronic wasting disease prions. Emerg Infect Dis 24:1482–1489. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2408.161888
Barria MA, Telling GC, Gambetti P, Mastrianni JA, Soto C (2011) Generation of a new form of human PrP(Sc) in vitro by interspecies transmission from cervid prions. J Biol Chem 286:7490–7495. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.198465
Belay ED, Maddox RA, Williams ES, Miller MW, Gambetti P, Schonberger LB (2004) Chronic wasting disease and potential transmission to humans. Emerg Infect Dis 10:977–984. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1006.031082
Benestad SL, Arsac JN, Goldmann W, Noremark M (2008) Atypical/Nor98 scrapie: properties of the agent, genetics, and epidemiology. Vet Res 39:19. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2007056
Beringue V, Andreoletti O, Le Dur A, Essalmani R, Vilotte JL, Lacroux C et al (2007) A bovine prion acquires an epidemic bovine spongiform encephalopathy strain-like phenotype on interspecies transmission. J Neurosci 27:6965–6971. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0693-07.2007
Beringue V, Herzog L, Jaumain E, Reine F, Sibille P, Le Dur A et al (2012) Facilitated cross-species transmission of prions in extraneural tissue. Science 335:472–475. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215659
Beringue V, Le Dur A, Tixador P, Reine F, Lepourry L, Perret-Liaudet A et al (2008) Prominent and persistent extraneural infection in human PrP transgenic mice infected with variant CJD. PLoS ONE 3:e1419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001419
Bruce M, Chree A, McConnell I, Foster J, Pearson G, Fraser H (1994) Transmission of bovine spongiform encephalopathy and scrapie to mice: strain variation and the species barrier. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 343:405–411. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1994.0036
Bruce ME, Will RG, Ironside JW, McConnell I, Drummond D, Suttie A et al (1997) Transmissions to mice indicate that “new variant” CJD is caused by the BSE agent. Nature 389:498–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/39057
Cheng YC, Hannaoui S, John TR, Dudas S, Czub S, Gilch S (2016) Early and non-invasive detection of chronic wasting disease prions in elk feces by real-time quaking induced conversion. PLoS ONE 11:e0166187. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166187
Cheng YC, Hannaoui S, John TR, Dudas S, Czub S, Gilch S (2017) Real-time quaking-induced conversion assay for detection of CWD prions in fecal material. J Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/56373
Collinge J (2001) Prion diseases of humans and animals: their causes and molecular basis. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:519–550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.519
Collinge J, Palmer MS, Dryden AJ (1991) Genetic predisposition to iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Lancet 337:1441–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)93128-v
Davenport KA, Henderson DM, Bian J, Telling GC, Mathiason CK, Hoover EA (2015) Insights into chronic wasting disease and bovine spongiform encephalopathy species barriers by use of real-time conversion. J Virol 89:9524–9531. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01439-15
Diack AB, Ritchie DL, Peden AH, Brown D, Boyle A, Morabito L et al (2014) Variably protease-sensitive prionopathy, a unique prion variant with inefficient transmission properties. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1969–1979. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2012.140214
Dickinson AG, Meikle VM (1971) Host-genotype and agent effects in scrapie incubation: change in allelic interaction with different strains of agent. Mol Gen Genet 112:73–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266934
Duque Velasquez C, Kim C, Haldiman T, Kim C, Herbst A, Aiken J et al (2020) Chronic wasting disease (CWD) prion strains evolve via adaptive diversification of conformers in hosts expressing prion protein polymorphisms. J Biol Chem 295:4985–5001. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.012546
Duque Velasquez C, Kim C, Herbst A, Daude N, Garza MC, Wille H et al (2015) Deer prion proteins modulate the emergence and adaptation of chronic wasting disease strains. J Virol 89:12362–12373. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02010-15
Gambetti P, Puoti G, Zou WQ (2011) Variably protease-sensitive prionopathy: a novel disease of the prion protein. J Mol Neurosci 45:422–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-011-9543-1
Haley NJ, Hoover EA (2015) Chronic wasting disease of cervids: current knowledge and future perspectives. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 3:305–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-111001
Halliez S, Reine F, Herzog L, Jaumain E, Haik S, Rezaei H et al (2014) Accelerated, spleen-based titration of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease infectivity in transgenic mice expressing human prion protein with sensitivity comparable to that of survival time bioassay. J Virol 88:8678–8686. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01118-14
Hannaoui S, Amidian S, Cheng YC, Duque Velasquez C, Dorosh L, Law S et al (2017) Destabilizing polymorphism in cervid prion protein hydrophobic core determines prion conformation and conversion efficiency. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006553. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006553
Hannaoui S, Schatzl HM, Gilch S (2017) Chronic wasting disease: emerging prions and their potential risk. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006619
Hannaoui S, Triscott E, Duque Velasquez C, Chang SC, Arifin MI, Zemlyankina I et al (2021) New and distinct chronic wasting disease strains associated with cervid polymorphism at codon 116 of the Prnp gene. PLoS Pathog 17:e1009795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009795
John TR, Schatzl HM, Gilch S (2013) Early detection of chronic wasting disease prions in urine of pre-symptomatic deer by real-time quaking-induced conversion assay. Prion 7:253–258. https://doi.org/10.4161/pri.24430
Johnson CJ, Herbst A, Duque-Velasquez C, Vanderloo JP, Bochsler P, Chappell R et al (2011) Prion protein polymorphisms affect chronic wasting disease progression. PLoS ONE 6:e17450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017450
Kong Q, Huang S, Zou W, Vanegas D, Wang M, Wu D et al (2005) Chronic wasting disease of elk: transmissibility to humans examined by transgenic mouse models. J Neurosci 25:7944–7949. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2467-05.2005
Kurt TD, Jiang L, Fernandez-Borges N, Bett C, Liu J, Yang T et al (2015) Human prion protein sequence elements impede cross-species chronic wasting disease transmission. J Clin Invest 125:2548. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI82647
Kurt TD, Jiang L, Fernandez-Borges N, Bett C, Liu J, Yang T et al (2015) Human prion protein sequence elements impede cross-species chronic wasting disease transmission. J Clin Invest 125:1485–1496. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI79408
Li L, Coulthart MB, Balachandran A, Chakrabartty A, Cashman NR (2007) Species barriers for chronic wasting disease by in vitro conversion of prion protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 364:796–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.10.087
Marsh RF, Kincaid AE, Bessen RA, Bartz JC (2005) Interspecies transmission of chronic wasting disease prions to squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). J Virol 79:13794–13796. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.79.21.13794-13796.2005
Martin D, Reine F, Herzog L, Igel-Egalon A, Aron N, Michel C et al (2021) Prion potentiation after life-long dormancy in mice devoid of PrP. Brain Commun 3:fcab092. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab092
Nonno R, Di Bari MA, Cardone F, Vaccari G, Fazzi P, Dell’Omo G et al (2006) Efficient transmission and characterization of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease strains in bank voles. PLoS Pathog 2:e12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0020012
Nonno R, Notari S, Di Bari MA, Cali I, Pirisinu L, d’Agostino C et al (2019) Variable protease-sensitive prionopathy transmission to bank voles. Emerg Infect Dis 25:73–81. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2501.180807
Orru CD, Wilham JM, Raymond LD, Kuhn F, Schroeder B, Raeber AJ et al (2011) Prion disease blood test using immunoprecipitation and improved quaking-induced conversion. MBio 2:e00078-00011. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00078-11
Osterholm MT, Anderson CJ, Zabel MD, Scheftel JM, Moore KA, Appleby BS (2019) Chronic wasting disease in cervids: implications for prion transmission to humans and other animal species. MBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01091-19
Palmer MS, Dryden AJ, Hughes JT, Collinge J (1991) Homozygous prion protein genotype predisposes to sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Nature 352:340–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/352340a0
Peden AH, Sarode DP, Mulholland CR, Barria MA, Ritchie DL, Ironside JW et al (2014) The prion protein protease sensitivity, stability and seeding activity in variably protease sensitive prionopathy brain tissue suggests molecular overlaps with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2:152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-014-0152-4
Piccardo P, Dlouhy SR, Lievens PM, Young K, Bird TD, Nochlin D et al (1998) Phenotypic variability of Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease is associated with prion protein heterogeneity. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 57:979–988. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005072-199810000-00010
Piccardo P, Langeveld JP, Hill AF, Dlouhy SR, Young K, Giaccone G et al (1998) An antibody raised against a conserved sequence of the prion protein recognizes pathological isoforms in human and animal prion diseases, including Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and bovine spongiform encephalopathy. Am J Pathol 152:1415–1420
Piccardo P, Liepnieks JJ, William A, Dlouhy SR, Farlow MR, Young K et al (2001) Prion proteins with different conformations accumulate in Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease caused by A117V and F198S mutations. Am J Pathol 158:2201–2207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64692-5
Pritzkow S, Gorski D, Ramirez F, Telling GC, Benestad SL, Soto C (2021) North American and Norwegian Chronic Wasting Disease prions exhibit different potential for interspecies transmission and zoonotic risk. J Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiab385
Pritzkow S, Morales R, Moda F, Khan U, Telling GC, Hoover E et al (2015) Grass plants bind, retain, uptake, and transport infectious prions. Cell Rep 11:1168–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.036
Prusiner SB (1998) Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:13363–13383. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.23.13363
Race B, Meade-White KD, Miller MW, Barbian KD, Rubenstein R, LaFauci G et al (2009) Susceptibilities of nonhuman primates to chronic wasting disease. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1366–1376. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1509.090253
Race B, Meade-White KD, Phillips K, Striebel J, Race R, Chesebro B (2014) Chronic wasting disease agents in nonhuman primates. Emerg Infect Dis 20:833–837. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2005.130778
Race B, Williams K, Chesebro B (2019) Transmission studies of chronic wasting disease to transgenic mice overexpressing human prion protein using the RT-QuIC assay. Vet Res 50:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-019-0626-2
Race B, Williams K, Orru CD, Hughson AG, Lubke L, Chesebro B (2018) Lack of transmission of chronic wasting disease to cynomolgus macaques. J Virol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00550-18
Safar JG, Geschwind MD, Deering C, Didorenko S, Sattavat M, Sanchez H et al (2005) Diagnosis of human prion disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3501–3506. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409651102
Sandberg MK, Al-Doujaily H, Sigurdson CJ, Glatzel M, O’Malley C, Powell C et al (2010) Chronic wasting disease prions are not transmissible to transgenic mice overexpressing human prion protein. J Gen Virol 91:2651–2657. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.024380-0
Tamguney G, Giles K, Bouzamondo-Bernstein E, Bosque PJ, Miller MW, Safar J et al (2006) Transmission of elk and deer prions to transgenic mice. J Virol 80:9104–9114. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00098-06
Tamguney G, Miller MW, Wolfe LL, Sirochman TM, Glidden DV, Palmer C et al (2009) Asymptomatic deer excrete infectious prions in faeces. Nature 461:529–532. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08289
Tennant JM, Li M, Henderson DM, Tyer ML, Denkers ND, Haley NJ et al (2020) Shedding and stability of CWD prion seeding activity in cervid feces. PLoS ONE 15:e0227094. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227094
Wadsworth JD, Asante EA, Desbruslais M, Linehan JM, Joiner S, Gowland I et al (2004) Human prion protein with valine 129 prevents expression of variant CJD phenotype. Science 306:1793–1796. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103932
Wadsworth JDF, Joiner S, Linehan JM, Jack K, Al-Doujaily H, Costa H et al (2021) Humanised transgenic mice are resistant to chronic wasting disease prions from Norwegian reindeer and moose. J Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiab033
Wang Z, Qin K, Camacho MV, Cali I, Yuan J, Shen P et al (2021) Generation of human chronic wasting disease in transgenic mice. Acta Neuropathol Commun 9:158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-021-01262-y
Wilham JM, Orru CD, Bessen RA, Atarashi R, Sano K, Race B et al (2010) Rapid end-point quantitation of prion seeding activity with sensitivity comparable to bioassays. PLoS Pathog 6:e1001217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001217
Wilson R, Plinston C, Hunter N, Casalone C, Corona C, Tagliavini F et al (2012) Chronic wasting disease and atypical forms of bovine spongiform encephalopathy and scrapie are not transmissible to mice expressing wild-type levels of human prion protein. J Gen Virol 93:1624–1629. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.042507-0
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Trent Bollinger, WCVM, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, for providing brain tissue from the 116AG isolate, Dr. Stéphane Haïk, ICM, Paris, France, for providing brain tissue from vCJD and sCJD cases, and for his expert consulting for the IHC interpretation, Dr. Nathalie Daude (Center for Prions and Protein Folding Diseases, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada) for her expertise on IHC, and Dr. Umberto Agrimi, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy, for the bank vole model. We thank animal facility staff for animal care, Dr. Stephanie Anderson for veterinary oversight, and Yo-Ching Cheng for preparing recombinant PrP substrates. Thank you to Dr. Stephanie Booth and Jennifer Myskiw, Public Health Agency of Canada (Winnipeg), Manitoba, Canada. We are grateful for financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Genome Canada, and the Alberta Prion Research Institute. SG is supported by the Canada Research Chairs program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file6 (MP4 24349 KB)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hannaoui, S., Zemlyankina, I., Chang, S.C. et al. Transmission of cervid prions to humanized mice demonstrates the zoonotic potential of CWD. Acta Neuropathol 144, 767–784 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-022-02482-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-022-02482-9