Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Paediatric surgeons are often called to counsel parents once a surgical abnormality is diagnosed on a prenatal scan. The referral base for a paediatric surgeon now includes the perinatal period. Expertise in surgical correction of congenital malformations may favourably influence the perinatal management of prenatally diagnosed anomalies, by changing the site of delivery for immediate postnatal treatment; altering the mode of delivery to prevent obstructed labour or haemorrhage: early delivery to prevent ongoing fetal organ damage, or treatment in utero to prevent, minimize or reverse fetal organ injury as a result of a structural defect [1, 2]. Crombleholme et al. [3] have confirmed the favourable impact of prenatal surgical consultation in influencing the site of delivery in 37% of cases, changing the mode of delivery by 6.8%, reversing the decision to terminate a pregnancy by 3.6% and influencing the early delivery of babies by 4.5%.
Counselling parents about prenatally suspected surgically correctable anomalies should not be solely performed by obstetricians or paediatricians. Similarly, the paediatric surgeon performing these prenatal consultations must be aware of differences between the prenatal and postnatal natural history of the anomaly. There is often a lack of understanding of the natural history and prognosis of a condition presenting in the newborn and the same condition diagnosed prenatally [4, 5].
The diagnosis and management of complex fetal anomalies require a team effort by obstetricians, neonatologists, genetecists, paediatricians and paediatric surgeons, to deal with all the maternal and fetal complexities of a diagnosis of a structural defect [6]. This team should be able to provide information to prospective parents on fetal outcomes, possible interventions, appropriate setting, time and route of delivery and expected postnatal outcomes. The role of the surgical consultant, in this team, is to present information regarding the prenatal and postnatal natural history of an anomaly, its surgical management, and the long-term outcome [2, 6–10].
Congenital malformation
Congenital malformations account for one of the major causes of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Single major birth defects affect 3% of newborns and 0.7% of babies have multiple defects. The prenatal hidden mortality is higher since the majority abort spontaneously. Despite improvements in perinatal care, serious birth defects still account for 20% of all deaths in the newborn period and an even greater percentage of serious morbidity later in infancy and childhood [11–13]. The major causes of congenital malformation are chromosomal abnormalities, mutant genes, multifactorial disorders and teratogenic agents.
Prenatal diagnosis
Prenatal diagnosis has remarkably improved our understanding of surgically correctable congenital malformations. It has allowed us to influence the delivery of the baby, offer prenatal surgical management and discuss the options of termination of pregnancy for seriously handicapping or lethal conditions. Antenatal diagnosis has also defined an in utero mortality for some lesions such as diaphragmatic hernia and sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) so that true outcomes can be measured. Prenatal ultrasound scanning has improved since its first use 30 years ago, thus providing better screening programmes and more accurate assessment of fetal anomaly. Screening for Down’s syndrome may now be offered in the first trimester (e.g. nuchal scan combined test), or second trimester (e.g. Triple blood test). Better resolution and increased experience with ultrasound scans has led to the recognition of ultrasound soft markers, which have increased the detection rate of fetal anomalies but at the expense of higher false positive rates.
Routine ultrasound screening identifies anomalies and places these pregnancies in the high-risk categories with maternal diabetes, hypertension, genetic disorders, raised alfa feto protein (AFP), etc. High-risk pregnancies maybe offered further invasive diagnostic investigations such as amniocentesis or chorionic villous sampling (CVS). Structural abnormalities difficult to define on ultrasound such as hindbrain lesions or in the presence of oligohydramnios are better imaged on ultra fast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). With the increasing range of options and sophistication of diagnostic methods, parents today are faced with more information, choice and decisions than ever before, which can create as well as help to solve dilemmas. The different tests and screening procedures commonly in use are outlined below.
Ultrasound examination
Ultrasound scan is routinely performed at 18–20 weeks’ gestation as part of the prenatal screening for all pregnancies in England and Wales. Older mothers are routinely screened but in addition are offered invasive testing. Pregnancies with maternal risk factors such as raised AFP levels, genetic disorders, family history of chromosomal abnormalities or monochorionic twins that carry a high risk for chromosomal anomalies are offered earlier scans in the first trimester. Abnormalities such as diaphragmatic hernia may be detected as early as 11 weeks gestation. First trimester scans are also useful for accurately dating pregnancies and defining chorionicity in multiple pregnancies.
More recently, nuchal translucency (NT) measurements have emerged as an independent marker of chromosomal abnormalities with a sensitivity of 60% [14], structural anomalies (particularly cardiac defects) [15] and for some rare genetic syndromes [16]. It involves measuring the area at the back of the fetal neck at 11–14 weeks gestation (Fig. 1). The mechanisms by which some abnormalities give rise to this transient anatomical change of NT are poorly understood [17]. Although some abnormalities can be seen at the time of the nuchal scan (11–14 weeks), most are detected at the 18–20-week anomaly scan. Some abnormalities such as gastroschisis have a higher detection rate on a scan than others, e.g. cardiac abnormalities.
If the NT measurement is increased and the karyotype is normal, there is a higher risk for a cardiac anomaly and these high-risk fetuses may be referred for fetal echocardiography, which provides better prenatal cardiac assessment than the routine screening scan [18]. Ultrasound surveillance is essential during the performance of invasive techniques such as amniocentesis, CVS and shunting procedures. It is also useful for assessing fetal viability before and after such procedures. Some abnormalities such as tracheo-oesophageal fistula (TOF), bowel atresia, diaphragmatic hernia and hydrocephaly may present later in pregnancy and thereby not detected on the routine 18-week scan.
Overall, around 60% of structural birth defects are detected prenatally [14] but the detection rate varies from 0% (isolated cleft palate) to close to 100% (gastroschisis) depending on the defect. True wrong diagnoses are rare but false positive diagnoses do occur; some are due to natural prenatal regression, but most are due to ultrasound ‘soft markers’.
Ultrasound ‘soft markers’ are changes noted on prenatal scan that are difficult to define. Examples are echogenic bowel [19], hydronephrosis and nuchal thickening. Their presence creates anxiety amongst sonographers since the finding may be transient with no pathological relevance or may be an indicator of significant anomalies such as chromosomal abnormalities [20], cystic fibrosis (echogenic bowel), Down’s syndrome (nuchal thickening) or renal abnormalities (hydronephrosis). Once soft markers are detected, should they be reported or further invasive tests offered, is a dilemma faced by obstetricians. Reporting these markers has increased detection rates at the expense of high false positive rates.
Ultrasound is routinely performed as a prenatal screening test. The reliability of the information obtained is dependent on the expertise and experience of the person performing the scan. In a recent study, congenital anomalies noted at birth were diagnosed on prenatal scan in 64% of cases with 0.5% opting for termination [21].
Invasive diagnostic tests
Amniocentesis [22] and CVS [23] are the two most commonly performed invasive diagnostic tests.
Amniocentesis
Amniocentesis is commonly used for detecting chromosomal abnormalities and less often for molecular studies, metabolic studies and fetal infection. It is performed after 15 weeks gestation and carries a low risk of fetal injury or loss (0.5–1%). Full karyotype analysis takes ∼2 weeks but newer RAPID techniques using fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can give limited (usually for trisomies 21, 18, 13) results within 2–3 days.
Chorionic villous sampling (CVS)
Chorionic villous sampling is the most reliable method for first trimester diagnosis and may be performed at 10–14 weeks’ gestation. The test involves ultrasound-guided biopsy of the chorionic villi. The added risk for fetal loss is ∼1–2%. The samples obtained may be subjected to a variety of tests including full karyotype, rapid karyotyping (FISH–PCR), enzyme analysis or molecular studies. Approximate timing of chromosomal results is 1–2 weeks for karyotyping and 2–3 days for FISH and PCR.
Prenatal maternal serum screening
Interest in detecting circulating fetal cells in maternal blood for diagnostic purposes has grown since the advent of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) [24]. The observation by Brock and Sutcliffe [25] of high levels of AFP in amniotic fluid of pregnancies complicated by open neural tube defects (NTDs) popularised this test. However, with increasing accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis, maternal serum screening of AFP solely for identification of NTDs cannot be justified. The more popular maternal serum screening test is the triple test (HCG, AFP and oestrogen) used in combination with the nuchal scan.
Fetal blood sampling (FBS)
Rapid karyotyping of CVS and amniotic fluid samples FISH and PCR has replaced fetal blood sampling for many conditions. However, FBS is still required for the diagnosis and treatment of haematological conditions and some viral infections. When required it is best performed by ultrasound guided needle sampling after 18 weeks gestation rather than the more invasive fetoscopic technique. Mortality from this procedure is reported to be 1–2% [26].
Fetal surgery
There is a spectrum of interventions ranging from simple aspiration of cysts to open fetal surgery. Minimally invasive techniques such as ablation of vessels in SCT, fetoscopic ablation of posterior urethal valves, tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia [27], etc. are currently under trial. However, laser ablation in twin-to-twin transfusion is now well established.
Genetic diagnoses
Antenatal detection of genetic abnormalities is increasing especially in high-risk pregnancies. Previously undiagnosed conditions such as cystic fibrosis [28], Beckwith Wideman syndrome, Hirshsprung’s disease, sickle cell disease, etc. may be detected prenatally following invasive testing and genetic counselling and assessment offered early in pregnancy.
Future developments
The aim of prenatal diagnosis and testing is to have 100% accuracy without fetal loss or injury and no maternal risk. National plans to improve Down’s screening using ultrasound and biochemical combination tests are now in place in UK. Research into new markers for chromosomal abnormalities is ongoing. The fetal nasal bone is one such example, which may assist, in detecting babies with chromosomal abnormalities [29].
Management of Rhesus disease is showing promise whereby fetal blood groups may be determined from maternal blood samples through detection of free fetal DNA [30]. The search for fetal components in maternal blood is an exciting and expanding field of research since past and present efforts to isolate and use them for diagnosis have met with little success [31]. Rapid detection techniques versus traditional cultures for karyotyping are currently under debate at present [32].
Three-dimensional images from new ultrasound machines may have a useful role in diagnosis and assessment of facial deformities such as cleft lip and palate. MRI may assist in better defining some lesions difficult to view on conventional prenatal scanning such as the presacral teratoma, PUV in the presence of oligohydramnios and hindbrain lesions. At present, MRI is unlikely to replace conventional ultrasound scans [33].
Specific surgical conditions
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH)
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia accounts for 1 in 3,000 live birth and challenges the neonatologist and paediatric surgeons in the management of this high-risk condition. Mortality remains high (more than 60%) when the ‘hidden’ mortality of in utero death and termination of pregnancy are taken into account [34]. Lung hypoplasia and pulmonary hypertension account for most deaths in isolated CDH newborns. Associated anomalies (30–40%) signify a grave prognosis with a survival rate of less than 10% [35].
In UK, most CDH are diagnosed at the 20-week anomaly scan with a detection rate approaching 60%, although as early as 11 weeks’ gestation has been reported [36]. MRI has a useful role in accurately differentiating CDH from cystic lung lesions [37] and may be useful in measuring fetal lung volumes as a predictor of outcome [38]. Cardiac anomalies (20%) [39], chromosomal anomalies of trisomy 13 and 18 (20%) [40] and urinary, gastrointestinal and neurological (33%) [41] can co-exist with CDH and should be ruled out by offering the patient fetal echocardiogram, amniocentesis and detailed anomaly scan. These associated anomalies and in isolated lesions, early detection, liver in the chest, polyhydramnios and fetal lung head ratio (LHR) of less than 1 are implicated as poor predictors of outcome [42]. In these patients with poor prognostic signs fetal surgery for CDH over the last two decades has been disappointing [43]; however benefit from fetal intervention with tracheal occlusion (FETO) awaits randomised studies [43, 44]. Favourable outcomes in CDH with the use of antenatal steroids has not been resolved in the clinical settings [45]. Elective delivery at a specialised centre is recommended with no benefit from caesarean section [46, 47].
Postnatal management is aimed at reducing barotrauma to the hypoplastic-lung by introducing high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) [48] or permissive hypercapnea [49], and treating the severe pulmonary hypertension with nitric oxide [50]. No clear benefits for CDH with extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been concluded in a 2002 Cochrane ECMO study [51].
Surgery for CDH is no longer an emergency procedure. Delayed repair following stabilisation is employed in most paediatric surgical centres [52]. Primary repair using the trans-abdominal route is achieved in 60–70% of patients with the rest requiring a prosthetic patch. Complications of sepsis or reherniation with prosthetic patch requiring revision is recorded in 50% of survivors [53]. Minimally invasive techniques have been successful in repairing diaphragmatic defects in ‘stable’ infants [54].
Long-term survivors of CDH are reported to develop chronic respiratory insufficiency (48%) [55], gastro-oesophageal reflux (89%) [56] and neurodevelopment delay (30%) [41].
Cystic lung lesions
Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations (CCAMs), bronchopulmonary sequestrations (BPS) or ‘hybrid’ lesions containing features of both are common cystic lung lesions noted on prenatal scan. Less common lung anomalies include bronchogenic cysts, congenital lobar emphysema and bronchial atresia [57]. Congenital cystic lung lesions are rare anomalies with an incidence of 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 35,000 [58, 59].
Prenatal detection rate of lung cysts at the routine 18–20-week scan is almost 100% and may be the commonest mode of actual presentation. Most of these lesions are easily distinguished from congenital diaphragmatic hernia however sonographic features of CCAM or BPS are not sufficiently accurate and correlate poorly with histology [60]. MRI though not routinely used, may provide better definition for this condition; however inaccuracies were reported in 11% of cases [61].
Bilateral disease and hydrops fetalis are indicators of poor outcome [62, 63], whereas mediastinal shift, polyhydramnios and early detection are not poor prognostic signs [63–66]. In the absence of termination the natural fetal demise of antenatally diagnosed cystic lung disease is 28%. It is well-documented that spontaneous involution of cystic lung lesions can occur [67] but complete postnatal resolution is rare [60], and apparent spontaneous ‘disappearance’ of antenatally diagnosed lesions should be interpreted with care, as nearly half of these cases subsequently require surgery [60, 66].
In only 10% of cases the need for fetal intervention arises. The spectrum of intervention include simple centesis of amniotic fluid [68], thoracoamniotic shunt placement [69], percutaneous laser ablation [66] and open fetal surgical resection [70]. Maternal steroid administration has also been reported to have a beneficial effect on some CCAMs although the mechanism is unclear [71]. A large cystic mass and hydrops in isolated cystic lung lesions are the only real indication for fetal intervention [57, 62, 63, 66].
Normal vaginal delivery is recommended unless maternal conditions indicate otherwise. Large lesion are predicted to become symptomatic shortly after birth (as high as 45% in some series) [72, 73], thus delivery at a specialised centre would be appropriate; however smaller lesions are less likely to be symptomatic at birth and could be delivered at the referring institution with follow up in a paediatric surgery clinic [74].
Postnatal management is dictated by clinical status at birth. Symptomatic lesions require urgent radiological evaluation with chest radiograph and ideally CT-scan (Fig. 2) followed by surgical excision. In asymptomatic cases postnatal investigation consist of chest CT-scan within 1 month of birth, even if regression or resolution is noted on prenatal scanning [60, 66, 74]. Plain radiography should not be relied upon since it will miss and underestimate many lesions [74].
Surgical excision of postnatal asymptomatic lesions remains controversial, with some centres opting for conservative management [75, 76]. The approach to treating this asymptomatic group has evolved in some centres, whereby a CT-scan is performed within 1 month postbirth, followed by surgery before 6 months of age due to the inherent risk of infection and malignant transformation [57, 74]. Small lesions, less than 3 cm may be managed expectantly with annual CT-scan, bearing in mind that the true resolution of these lesions is exceptional [60, 66, 73, 74]. Successful outcome of greater than 90% have been reported for these surgically managed asymptomatic lung lesions [60, 66, 73, 74].
Abdominal wall defects
Exomphalos and gastroschisis are both common but distinct abdominal wall defects with an unclear aetiology and a controversial prognosis [77–79]. Attention may be drawn to their presence during the second trimester because of raised maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein level, or abnormal ultrasounds scan.
Exomphalos
Exomphalos is characteristically a mid-line defect, at the insertion point of the umbilical cord, with a viable sac composed of amnion and peritoneum containing herniated abdominal contents. Incidence is known to be 1 in 4,000 live births. Associated major abnormalities which include trisomy 13,18 and 21, Beckwith Wiedeman syndrome (macroglossia, gigantism and exomphalos), Pentology of Cantrell (sternal, pericardial, cardiac, abdominal wall and diaphragmatic defect), cardiac, gastrointestinal and renal abnormalities are noted in 60–70% of cases [80], thus karyotyping, in addition to detailed sonographic review and fetal echocardiogram is essential for complete prenatal screening. Fetal intervention is unlikely in this condition. If termination is not considered, normal vaginal delivery at a centre with neonatal surgical expertise is recommended and delivery by caesarean section only reserved for large exomphalos with exteriorised liver to prevent damage [80, 81].
Surgical repair include primary closure or a staged repair with a silo for giant defects. Occasionally in vulnerable infants with severe pulmonary hypoplasia or complex cardiac abnormalities the exomphalos may be left intact and allowed to slowly granulate and epithelialise by application of antiseptic solution [82]. Postnatal morbidity occurs in 5–10% of cases [83, 84]. Malrotation and adhesive bowel obstruction does contribute to mortality in isolated exomphalos however the majority of these children survive to live normal lives [85].
Gastroschisis
Gastroschisis is an isolated lesion that usually occurs on the right side of the umbilical defect with evisceration of the abdominal contents directly into the amniotic cavity [77, 79]. The incidence is increasing from 1.66 per 10,000 births to 4.6 per 10,000 births affecting mainly young mothers typically less than 20 years old. Associated anomalies are noted in only 5–24% of cases with bowel atresia the most common co-existing abnormality [86, 87]. On prenatal scan with a detection rate of 100%, the bowel appears to be free floating, and the loops may appear to be thickened due to damage by amniotic fluid exposure causing a ‘peel’ formation. Dilated loops of bowel (Fig. 3) may be seen from obstruction secondary to protrusion from a defect or atresia due to intestinal ischaemia [88, 89].
Predicting outcome in fetuses with gastroschisis based on prenatal ultrasound finding remains a challenge. There is some evidence that maximum small-bowel diameter may be predictive [90], however thickened matted bowel [91] and Doppler measurements of the superior mesenteric artery are not accurate predictors of outcome [92]. To reduce the rate of third trimester fetal loss serial ultrasounds are performed to monitor the development of bowel obstruction and delivery around 37 weeks recommended at a centre with neonatal surgical expertise [93].
Recent study by Logghe et al. has challenged elective preterm delivery with a randomised control trial [94]. Delivery by caesarean section has no advantage to normal vaginal route [95]. Despite efforts to plan elective delivery, 50% of cases will require emergency caesarean section due to development of fetal distress [83, 84, 96].
Various methods of postnatal surgical repair include the traditional primary closure, reduction of bowel without anaesthesia [97], reduction by preformed silo [98], or by means of a traditional silo. Co-existing intestinal atresia could be repaired by primary anastamosis or staged with stoma formation. Variation in achieving full enteral feeding due to prolonged gut dysmotility is expected in all cases.
The long-term outcome in gastroschisis is dependent on the condition of the bowel. In uncomplicated cases the outcome is excellent in more than 90% of cases [99]. The mortality of live born infants is 5% with further 5% suffering short-bowel syndrome and 10% requiring surgery for adhesive bowel obstruction [19, 100]. Late third trimester fetal loss should always be mentioned during fetal counselling.
Tracheo-oesophageal fistula (TOF) and oesophageal atresia (OA)
Repair of TOF/OA is a condition, which measures the skill of paediatric surgeons from trainee to independent surgeon. The incidence is estimated at 1 in 3,000 births. Prenatally, the condition may be suspected from maternal polyhydramnios and absence of a fetal stomach bubble at the 20-week anomaly scan. Prenatal scan diagnosis of TOF/OA is estimated to be less than 42% sensitive with a positive predicted value of 56% [19, 100, 101]. Additional diagnostic clues are provided by associated anomalies such as trisomy (13, 18 and 21), VACTERAL sequence (vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, tracheo-oesophageal, renal and limbs) and CHARGE association (coloboma, heart defects, atresia choanae, retarded development, genital hypoplasia and ear abnormality). These associated anomalies are present in more than 50% of cases and worsen the prognosis and thus, prenatal karyotyping is essential [102]. Duodenal atresia may co-exist with TOF/OA. The risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies for isolated TOF/OA is less than 1% [103]. Delivery is advised to be at specialised centre with neonatal surgical input.
Postnatal surgical management is dependent on the size and condition of the baby, length of oesophageal gap and associated anomalies [104, 105]. Primary repair of the oesophagus is the treatment of choice; however, if not achieved, staged repair with upper oesophageal pouch care and gastrostomy or organ replacement with stomach or large bowel are other options. Associated anomalies require evaluation and treatment. Minimally invasive thoracoscopic approach to the repair of TOF may be offered by advanced paediatric endosurgical centres [106, 107].
Early outcome of a high leak rate and oesophageal stricture requiring dilatation in 50% of cases are expected where the anastamosis of the oesophagus is created under tension [108].
Long-term outcome are indicated by improved perinatal management and inherent structural and functional defects in the trachea and oesophagus [109]. In early life, growth of the child is reported to be below the 25 centile in 50% of cases [110], respiratory symptoms in two-thirds of TOF/OA [111] and gastro-oesophageal reflux recorded in 50% of patients [112, 113]. Quality of life is better in the isolated group with successful primary repair as compared to those with associated anomalies and delayed repair [114].
Gastrointestinal lesions
The presence of dilated loops of bowel (>15 mm in length and 7 mm in diameter) on prenatal ultrasound scan is indicative of bowel obstruction.
Duodenal atresia has a characteristic ‘double bubble’ appearance on prenatal scan, resulting from the simultaneous dilatation of the stomach and proximal duodenum. Detection rate on second trimester anomaly scan is almost 100% in the presence of polyhydramnios and the ‘double bubble’ sign. Associated anomalies are present in ∼50% of cases with most notably trisomy 21 in 30% of cases [115] cardiac anomalies in 20% [115] and the presence of the VACTERL association (vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, tracheo-oesophageal, renal and limbs).
The incidence of duodenal atresia is 1 in 5,000 live birth. The postnatal survival rate is >95% [19] with associated anomalies, low birth weight and prematurity contributing to the <5% mortality. Temporary delay in enteral feeding occurs due to the dysmotility in the dilated stomach and duodenum.
There are many bowel abnormalities, which may be noted on prenatal scanning (dilated bowel, ascites, cystic masses (K. Lakhoo et al., unpublished data), hyperparistalsis, poyhydramnios and echogenic bowel [116]; however, none is absolutely predictive of postnatal outcome. Patients with obstruction frequently have findings (especially in the third trimester) of bowel dilatation, polyhydramnios and hyperparistalsis, but ultrasound is much less sensitive in diagnosing large bowel anomalies than those in small bowel [19]. Since the large bowel is mostly a reservoir, with no physiologic function in utero, defects in this region such as anorectal malformations or Hirshsprung’s disease are very difficult to detect. Bowel dilatation and echogenic bowel may be associated cystic fibrosis; therefore, all such fetuses should undergo postnatal evaluation for this disease [6]. Prenatally diagnosed small-bowel atresia does not select for a group with a worse prognosis and survival rates are 95–100% [117].
Sacrococcygeal teratoma
Sacrococcygeal teratoma is the commonest neonatal tumour accounting for 1 in 35,000–40,000 births. Four types have been defined [118]:
-
Type 1 external tumour with a small presacral component.
-
Type 2 external tumours with a large presacral component.
-
Type 3 predominantly presacral with a small external component.
-
Type 4 entirely presacral.
The latter carry the worst prognosis due to delay in diagnosis and malignant presentation. Doppler ultrasound is the diagnostic tool, however fetal MRI provides better definition of the intrapelvic component [119]. SCT is a highly vascular tumour and the fetus may develop high cardiac output failure, anaemia and ultimately hydrops with a mortality of almost 100% [120, 121]. Fetal treatment of tumour resection or ablation of feeding vessel has been attempted in hydropic patients [122]. Caesarean section may be offered to patients with large tumours to avoid the risk of bleeding during delivery. Postnatal outcomes following surgery in type 1 and 2 lesions are favourable however type 3 and 4 tumours may present with urological problems and less favourable outcomes. Long-term follow up with alpha feto protein and serial pelvic ultrasounds is mandatory to exclude recurrence of the disease.
Renal anomalies
Urogenital abnormalities are among the commonest disorders seen in the perinatal period and account for almost 20% of all prenatally diagnosed anomalies [123]. The routine use of antenatal ultrasound scans has resulted in the early detection of these conditions and in selected cases has led to the development of management strategies including fetal intervention aimed at preservation of renal function. Two major issues are the indications for intervention in bladder outlet obstruction and early pyeloplasty in infancy in cases with hydronephrosis [124].
Prenatal evaluation of a dilated urinary tract is based on serial ultrasound scans as well as measurement of urinary electrolytes. Ultrasonography provides measurements of the renal pelvis, assessment of the renal parenchyma as well as the detection of cysts in the cortex. In severe disease, lack of amniotic fluid may make ultrasound assessment of the renal tract difficult and MRI may be helpful [125]. Oligohydramnios is indicative of poor renal function and poor prognosis owing to the associated pulmonary hypoplasia. Urogenital anomalies co-exist with many other congenital abnormalities and amniocentesis should be offered in appropriate cases. It is estimated that 3% of infants will have an abnormality of the Urogenital system and half of these will require some form of surgical intervention [126].
Upper urinary tract obstruction
Antenatal hydronephrosis accounts for 0.6–0.65% pregnancies [127]. The most common cause of prenatal hydronephrosis is pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJ), others being transient hydronephrosis, physiological hydronephrosis, multicystic kidney, PUV, ureterocoele, ectopic ureter, etc. The prognosis of antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis in unilateral disease and in renal pelvic diameter of <10 mm, is excellent [128]. Spontaneous resolution is noted in 20% of patients at birth and 80% at 3 years of age [129]. Only 17% of prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis need surgical intervention. Postnatal management of hydronephrosis require ultrasound at birth and at 1 month of age, and further evaluation with radiology and scintigraphy if an abnormality is suspected [130]. The non-operative treatment of antenatally detected hydronephrosis has been carefully monitored over a 17-year period and from an analysis of six patient series the conclusion is that this approach is safe [131].
Lower urinary tract obstruction
Posterior urethral valves are the most common cause for lower urinary tract obstruction in boys with an incidence of 1 in 2,000–4,000 lives male births. The diagnosis of PUV is suspected on the prenatal ultrasound finding of bilateral hydronephrosis associated with a thickened bladder and decreased amniotic fluid volume [132]. Serial fetal urine analysis may provide prognostic information on renal function. Prenatal diagnosis for patients with PUV is a poor prognostic sign with 64% incidence of renal failure and transient pulmonary failure, compared to 33% in the postnatally diagnosed patients [133]. Pulmonary hypoplasia secondary to oligohydramnios largely contributes to the morbidity and mortality from fetal urethral obstruction. Outcomes of fetal intervention with vescicoamniotic shunting [134, 135] or fetal cystoscopic ablation of urethal valve [136] is still under review and awaits a multicenter trial.
Postnatal management include ultrasound confirmation of the diagnosis, bladder drainage via a suprapubic or urethral route and contrast imaging of the urethra. Primary PUV ablation, vescicostomy or ureterostomy are postnatal surgical options. The overall outcome from this disease is unfavourable.
Conclusion
The boundaries of paediatric surgical practice have been extended by prenatal diagnosis. The care of patients with surgically correctable defects can now be planned prenatally with the collaborative effort of obstetricians, geneticists, neonatologists and paediatric surgeons. Essential to prenatal counselling is the understanding of the specific surgical condition’s prenatal natural history, the limitations of prenatal diagnosis, the detection of associated anomalies, the risks and indications of fetal intervention programmes and postnatal outcomes. Prenatal counselling is an essential component of paediatric surgical practice and should be ensured in the training programme for future paediatric surgeons.
References
Aite L, Trucchi A, Nahom A, Zaccara A, La Sala E, Bagolan P (2003) Antenatal diagnosis of surgically correctable anomalies: effects of repeated consultations on parental anxiety. J Perinatol 23:652–654
Adzick NS, Harrison MR (1994) The unborn surgical patient. Curr Probl Surg 31:1–68
Crombleholme TM, D’Alton M, Cendron M, Alman B, Goldberg MD, Klauber GT, Cohen A, Heilman C, Lewis M, Harris BH (1996) Prenatal diagnosis and the pediatric surgeon: the impact of prenatal consultation on perinatal management. J Pediatr Surg 31:156–162, discussion 162–153
Hunfeld JA, Wladimiroff JW, Passchier J, Venema-Van Uden MU, Frets PG, Verhage F (1993) Emotional reactions in women in late pregnancy (24 weeks or longer) following the ultrasound diagnosis of a severe or lethal fetal malformation. Prenat Diagn 13:603–612
Harrison MR, Bjordal RI, Langmark F, Knutrud O (1978) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the hidden mortality. J Pediatr Surg 13:227–230
Lakhoo K (2006) Introduction: surgical conditions of the fetus and newborn. Early Hum Dev 82:281
Touloukian RJ, Hobbins JC (1980) Maternal ultrasonography in the antenatal diagnosis of surgically correctable fetal abnormalities. J Pediatr Surg 15:373–377
Grisoni ER, Gauderer MW, Wolfson RN, Izant RJ Jr (1986) Antenatal ultrasonography: the experience in a high risk perinatal center. J Pediatr Surg 21:358–361
Wilkinson LG, Powell RW, Cabaniss ML, Ramenofsky ML (1987) Surgical problems in the fetus: a multidisciplinary approach. Am J Surg 154:685–687
Adzick NS, Harrison MR (1994) Fetal surgical therapy. Lancet 343:897–902
Ling EW (1992) Frequency and load of congenital anomalies in a neonatal intensive care unit, prenatal diagnosis, and perinatal management. Semin Perinatol 16:352–357
CEMACH (2005) Stillbirth, neonatal and post-neonatal mortality 2000–2003, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. RCOG Press, London
Kramer MS, Liu S, Luo Z, Yuan H, Platt RW, Joseph KS (2002) Analysis of perinatal mortality and its components: time for a change? Am J Epidemiol 156:493–497
Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V, Salonen R, Ylostalo P (1997) Increased nuchal translucency as a marker for fetal chromosomal defects. N Engl J Med 337:1654–1658
Hyett J, Perdu M, Sharland G, Snijders R, Nicolaides KH (1999) Using fetal nuchal translucency to screen for major congenital cardiac defects at 10-14 weeks of gestation: population based cohort study. BMJ 318:81–85
Souka AP, Von Kaisenberg CS, Hyett JA, Sonek JD, Nicolaides KH (2005) Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1005–1021
Haak MC, van Vugt JM (2003) Pathophysiology of increased nuchal translucency: a review of the literature. Hum Reprod Update 9:175–184
Pajkrt E, Weisz B, Firth HV, Chitty LS (2004) Fetal cardiac anomalies and genetic syndromes. Prenat Diagn 24:1104–1115
Patel Y, Boyd PA, Chamberlain P, Lakhoo K (2004) Follow-up of children with isolated fetal echogenic bowel with particular reference to bowel-related symptoms. Prenat Diagn 24:35–37
Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, Mugford M, Neilson J, Roberts T, Martin MA (2000) Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women’s views. Health Technol Assess 4(i–vi):1–193
Boyd PA, Armstrong B, Dolk H, Botting B, Pattenden S, Abramsky L, Rankin J, Vrijheid M, Wellesley D (2005) Congenital anomaly surveillance in England—ascertainment deficiencies in the national system. BMJ 330:27
Delisle MF, Wilson RD (1999) First trimester prenatal diagnosis: amniocentesis. Semin Perinatol 23:414–423
Jenkins TM, Wapner RJ (1999) First trimester prenatal diagnosis: chorionic villus sampling. Semin Perinatol 23:403–413
Herzenberg LA, Bianchi DW, Schroder J, Cann HM, Iverson GM (1979) Fetal cells in the blood of pregnant women: detection and enrichment by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:1453–1455
Brock DJ, Sutcliffe RG (1972) Alpha-fetoprotein in the antenatal diagnosis of anencephaly and spina bifida. Lancet 2:197–199
Boulot P, Deschamps F, Lefort G, Sarda P, Mares P, Hedon B, Laffargue F, Viala JL (1990) Pure fetal blood samples obtained by cordocentesis: technical aspects of 322 cases. Prenat Diagn 10:93–100
Deprest J, Gratacos E, Nicolaides KH (2004) Fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: evolution of a technique and preliminary results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:121–126
Rosenstein BJ, Zeitlin PL (1998) Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 351:277–282
Sonek JD (2003) Nasal bone evaluation with ultrasonography: a marker for fetal aneuploidy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:11–15
Finning KM, Martin PG, Soothill PW, Avent ND (2002) Prediction of fetal D status from maternal plasma: introduction of a new noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping service. Transfusion 42:1079–1085
Bischoff FZ, Hahn S, Johnson KL, Simpson JL, Bianchi DW, Lewis DE, Weber WD, Klinger K, Elias S, Jackson LG, Evans MI, Holzgreve W, de la Cruz F (2003) Intact fetal cells in maternal plasma: are they really there? Lancet 361:139–140
Chitty LS, Kagan KO, Molina FS, Waters JJ, Nicolaides KH (2006) Fetal nuchal translucency scan and early prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities by rapid aneuploidy screening: observational study. BMJ 332:452–455
Ogle RF, Rodeck CH (1998) Novel fetal imaging techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 10:109–115
Stege G, Fenton A, Jaffray B (2003) Nihilism in the 1990s: the true mortality of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics 112:532–535
Beresford MW, Shaw NJ (2000) Outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Pulmonol 30:249–256
Garne E, Haeusler M, Barisic I, Gjergja R, Stoll C, Clementi M (2002) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: evaluation of prenatal diagnosis in 20 European regions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:329–333
Williams HJ, Johnson KJ (2002) Imaging of congenital cystic lung lesions. Paediatr Respir Rev 3:120–127
Osada H, Kaku K, Masuda K, Iitsuka Y, Seki K, Sekiya S (2004) Quantitative and qualitative evaluations of fetal lung with MR imaging. Radiology 231:887–892
Cohen MS, Rychik J, Bush DM, Tian ZY, Howell LJ, Adzick NS, Flake AW, Johnson MP, Spray TL, Crombleholme TM (2002) Influence of congenital heart disease on survival in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr 141:25–30
Pober BR, Lin A, Russell M, Ackerman KG, Chakravorty S, Strauss B, Westgate MN, Wilson J, Donahoe PK, Holmes LB (2005) Infants with Bochdalek diaphragmatic hernia: sibling precurrence and monozygotic twin discordance in a hospital-based malformation surveillance program. Am J Med Genet A 138:81–88
Huddy CL, Boyd PA, Wilkinson AR, Chamberlain P (1999) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: prenatal diagnosis, outcome and continuing morbidity in survivors. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:1192–1196
Laudy JA, Van Gucht M, Van Dooren MF, Wladimiroff JW, Tibboel D (2003) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an evaluation of the prognostic value of the lung-to-head ratio and other prenatal parameters. Prenat Diagn 23:634–639
Harrison MR, Keller RL, Hawgood SB, Kitterman JA, Sandberg PL, Farmer DL, Lee H, Filly RA, Farrell JA, Albanese CT (2003) A randomized trial of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for severe fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia. N Engl J Med 349:1916–1924
Jani J, Gratacos E, Greenough A, Piero JL, Benachi A, Harrison M, Nicolaides K, Deprest J (2005) Percutaneous fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) for severe left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 48:910–922
Ford WD, Kirby CP, Wilkinson CS, Furness ME, Slater AJ (2002) Antenatal betamethasone and favourable outcomes in fetuses with ‘poor prognosis’ diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Surg Int 18:244–246
Betremieux P, Lionnais S, Beuchee A, Pladys P, Le Bouar G, Pasquier L, Loeuillet-Olivo L, Azzis O, Milon J, Wodey E, Fremond B, Odent S, Poulain P (2002) Perinatal management and outcome of prenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a 1995–2000 series in Rennes University Hospital. Prenat Diagn 22:988–994
Skari H, Bjornland K, Frenckner B, Friberg LG, Heikkinen M, Hurme T, Loe B, Mollerlokken G, Nielsen OH, Qvist N, Rintala R, Sandgren K, Wester T, Emblem R (2002) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Scandinavia from 1995 to 1998: predictors of mortality. J Pediatr Surg 37:1269–1275
Desfrere L, Jarreau PH, Dommergues M, Brunhes A, Hubert P, Nihoul-Fekete C, Mussat P, Moriette G (2000) Impact of delayed repair and elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on survival of antenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia: first application of these strategies in the more “severe” subgroup of antenatally diagnosed newborns. Intensive Care Med 26:934–941
Wung JT, James LS, Kilchevsky E, James E (1985) Management of infants with severe respiratory failure and persistence of the fetal circulation, without hyperventilation. Pediatrics 76:488–494
Finer NN, Barrington KJ (2001) Nitric oxide for respiratory failure in infants born at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD000399
Elbourne D, Field D, Mugford M (2002) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe respiratory failure in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001340
Moyer V, Moya F, Tibboel R, Losty P, Nagaya M, Lally KP (2002) Late versus early surgical correction for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001695
Moss RL, Chen CM, Harrison MR (2001) Prosthetic patch durability in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a long-term follow-up study. J Pediatr Surg 36:152–154
Yang EY, Allmendinger N, Johnson SM, Chen C, Wilson JM, Fishman SJ (2005) Neonatal thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: selection criteria for successful outcome. J Pediatr Surg 40:1369–1375
Davis PJ, Firmin RK, Manktelow B, Goldman AP, Davis CF, Smith JH, Cassidy JV Shekerdemian LS (2004) Long-term outcome following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the UK experience. J Pediatr 144:309–315
Kieffer J, Sapin E, Berg A, Beaudoin S, Bargy F, Helardot PG (1995) Gastroesophageal reflux after repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 30:1330–1333
Stanton M, Davenport M (2006) Management of congenital lung lesions. Early Hum Dev 82:289–295
Laberge JM, Flageole H, Pugash D, Khalife S, Blair G, Filiatrault D, Russo P, Lees G, Wilson RD (2001) Outcome of the prenatally diagnosed congenital cystic adenomatoid lung malformation: a Canadian experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 16:178–186
Duncombe GJ, Dickinson JE, Kikiros CS (2002) Prenatal diagnosis and management of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:950–954
Calvert JK, Boyd PA, Chamberlain PC, Syed S, Lakhoo K (2006) Outcome of antenatally suspected congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung: 10 years’ experience 1991–2001. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 91:F26–F28
Hubbard AM, Adzick NS, Crombleholme TM, Coleman BG, Howell LJ, Haselgrove JC, Mahboubi S (1999) Congenital chest lesions: diagnosis and characterization with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 212:43–48
Adzick NS (2003) Management of fetal lung lesions. Clin Perinatol 30:481–492
Usui N, Kamata S, Sawai T, Kamiyama M, Okuyama H, Kubota A, Okada A (2004) Outcome predictors for infants with cystic lung disease. J Pediatr Surg 39:603–606
Bunduki V, Ruano R, da Silva MM, Miguelez J, Miyadahira S, Maksoud JG, Zugaib M (2000) Prognostic factors associated with congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Prenat Diagn 20:459–464
Crombleholme TM, Coleman B, Hedrick H, Liechty K, Howell L, Flake AW, Johnson M, Adzick NS (2002) Cystic adenomatoid malformation volume ratio predicts outcome in prenatally diagnosed cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. J Pediatr Surg 37:331–338
Davenport M, Warne SA, Cacciaguerra S, Patel S, Greenough A, Nicolaides K (2004) Current outcome of antenally diagnosed cystic lung disease. J Pediatr Surg 39:549–556
Roggin KK, Breuer CK, Carr SR, Hansen K, Kurkchubasche AG, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr, Luks FI (2000) The unpredictable character of congenital cystic lung lesions. J Pediatr Surg 35:801–805
Brown MF, Lewis D, Brouillette RM, Hilman B, Brown EG (1995) Successful prenatal management of hydrops, caused by congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation, using serial aspirations. J Pediatr Surg 30:1098–1099
Adzick NS, Harrison MR, Crombleholme TM, Flake AW, Howell LJ (1998) Fetal lung lesions: management and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:884–889
Harrison MR, Adzick NS, Jennings RW, Duncan BW, Rosen MA, Filly RA, Goldberg JD, deLorimier AA, Golbus MS (1990) Antenatal intervention for congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation. Lancet 336:965–967
Tsao K, Hawgood S, Vu L, Hirose S, Sydorak R, Albanese CT, Farmer DL, Harrison MR, Lee H (2003) Resolution of hydrops fetalis in congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation after prenatal steroid therapy. J Pediatr Surg 38:508–510
Marshall KW, Blane CE, Teitelbaum DH, van Leeuwen K (2000) Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation: impact of prenatal diagnosis and changing strategies in the treatment of the asymptomatic patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1551–1554
Sauvat F, Michel JL, Benachi A, Emond S, Revillon Y (2003) Management of asymptomatic neonatal cystic adenomatoid malformations. J Pediatr Surg 38:548–552
Calvert J, Lakhoo K (2007) Antenatally suspected congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung (CCAM): postnatal investigation and timing of surgery. J Pediatr Surg 42(2):411–414
Jaffe A, Chitty LS (2006) Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations may not require surgical intervention. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 91:F464
Chetcuti PA, Crabbe DC (2006) CAM lungs: the conservative approach. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 91:F463–F464
Boyd PA, Bhattacharjee A, Gould S, Manning N, Chamberlain P (1998) Outcome of prenatally diagnosed anterior abdominal wall defects. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 78:F209–F213
Nicolaides KH, Rodeck CH, Gosden CM (1986) Rapid karyotyping in non-lethal fetal malformations. Lancet 1:283–287
Torfs C, Curry C, Roeper P (1990) Gastroschisis. J Pediatr 116:1–6
How HY, Harris BJ, Pietrantoni M, Evans JC, Dutton S, Khoury J, Siddiqi TA (2000) Is vaginal delivery preferable to elective cesarean delivery in fetuses with a known ventral wall defect? Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1527–1534
Nuchtern JG, Baxter R, Hatch EI Jr (1995) Nonoperative initial management versus silon chimney for treatment of giant omphalocele. J Pediatr Surg 30:771–776
Lakasing L, Cicero S, Davenport M, Patel S, Nicolaides KH (2006) Current outcome of antenatally diagnosed exomphalos: an 11 year review. J Pediatr Surg 41:1403–1406
Tunell WP, Puffinbarger NK, Tuggle DW, Taylor DV, Mantor PC (1995) Abdominal wall defects in infants. Survival and implications for adult life. Ann Surg 221:525–528, discussion 528–530
Berseth CL, Malachowski N, Cohn RB, Sunshine P (1982) Longitudinal growth and late morbidity of survivors of gastroschisis and omphalocele. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1:375–379
Dykes EH (1996) Prenatal diagnosis and management of abdominal wall defects. Semin Pediatr Surg 5:90–94
Langer JC, Bell JG, Castillo RO, Crombleholme TM, Longaker MT, Duncan BW, Bradley SM, Finkbeiner WE, Verrier ED, Harrison MR (1990) Etiology of intestinal damage in gastroschisis, II. Timing and reversibility of histological changes, mucosal function, and contractility. J Pediatr Surg 25:1122–1126
Langer JC, Longaker MT, Crombleholme TM, Bond SJ, Finkbeiner WE, Rudolph CA, Verrier ED, Harrison MR (1989) Etiology of intestinal damage in gastroschisis. I: effects of amniotic fluid exposure and bowel constriction in a fetal lamb model. J Pediatr Surg 24:992–997
Babcook CJ, Hedrick MH, Goldstein RB, Callen PW, Harrison MR, Adzick NS, Filly RA (1994) Gastroschisis: can sonography of the fetal bowel accurately predict postnatal outcome? J Ultrasound Med 13:701–706
Brun M, Grignon A, Guibaud L, Garel L, Saint-Vil D (1996) Gastroschisis: are prenatal ultrasonographic findings useful for assessing the prognosis? Pediatr Radiol 26:723–726
Luton D, De Lagausie P, Guibourdenche J, Oury JF, Vuillard E, Sibony O, Farnoux C, Aigrain Y, Blot P (1997) Prognostic factors of prenatally diagnosed gastroschisis. Fetal Diagn Ther 12:7–14
Abuhamad AZ, Mari G, Cortina RM, Croitoru DP, Evans AT (1997) Superior mesenteric artery Doppler velocimetry and ultrasonographic assessment of fetal bowel in gastroschisis: a prospective longitudinal study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:985–990
Moir CR, Ramsey PS, Ogburn PL, Johnson RV, Ramin KD (2004) A prospective trial of elective preterm delivery for fetal gastroschisis. Am J Perinatol 21:289–294
Logghe HL, Mason GC, Thornton JG, Stringer MD (2005) A randomized controlled trial of elective preterm delivery of fetuses with gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 40:1726–1731
Segel SY, Marder SJ, Parry S, Macones GA (2001) Fetal abdominal wall defects and mode of delivery: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 98:867–873
Burge DM, Ade-Ajayi N (1997) Adverse outcome after prenatal diagnosis of gastroschisis: the role of fetal monitoring. J Pediatr Surg 32:441–444
Davies BW, Stringer MD (1997) The survivors of gastroschisis. Arch Dis Child 77:158–160
Bianchi A, Dickson AP (1998) Elective delayed reduction and no anesthesia: ‘minimal intervention management’ for gastrochisis. J Pediatr Surg 33:1338–1340
Schlatter M (2003) Preformed silos in the management of gastroschisis: new progress with an old idea. Curr Opin Pediatr 15:239–242
Baerg J, Kaban G, Tonita J, Pahwa P, Reid D (2003) Gastroschisis: a sixteen-year review. J Pediatr Surg 38:771–774
Stringer MD, McKenna KM, Goldstein RB, Filly RA, Adzick NS, Harrison MR (1995) Prenatal diagnosis of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 30:1258–1263
Sparey C, Jawaheer G, Barrett AM, Robson SC (2000) Esophageal atresia in the Northern Region Congenital Anomaly Survey, 1985–1997: prenatal diagnosis and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:427–431
Spitz L (2005) Esophageal atresia and tracheo-esophageal malformations. In: Ashcraft KW, Holcomb G, Murphy JP (eds) Pediatric surgery. Elsevier Saunders, Amsterdam, pp 352–370
Spitz L, Kiely EM, Morecroft JA, Drake DP (1994) Oesophageal atresia: at-risk groups for the 1990s. J Pediatr Surg 29:723–725
Rothenberg SS (2005) Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheo-esophageal fistula. Semin Pediatr Surg 14:2–7
Jaffray B (2005) Minimally invasive surgery. Arch Dis Child 90:537–542
Hagberg S, Rubenson A, Sillen U, Werkmaster K (1986) Management of long-gap esophagus: experience with end-to-end anastomosis under maximal tension. Prog Pediatr Surg 19:88–92
Nambirajan L, Rintala RJ, Losty PD, Carty H, Lloyd DA (1998) The value of early postoperative oesophagography following repair of oesophageal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 13:76–78
Dutta HK, Mathur M, Bhatnagar V (2000) A histopathological study of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 35:438–441
Little DC, Rescorla FJ, Grosfeld JL, West KW, Scherer LR, Engum SA (2003) Long-term analysis of children with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 38:852–856
Chetcuti P, Phelan PD (1993) Respiratory morbidity after repair of oesophageal atresia and tracheo-oesophageal fistula. Arch Dis Child 68:167–170
Engum SA, Grosfeld JL, West KW, Rescorla FJ, Scherer LR III (1995) Analysis of morbidity and mortality in 227 cases of esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula over two decades. Arch Surg 130:502–508, discussion 508–509
Ure BM, Slany E, Eypasch EP, Weiler K, Troidl H, Holschneider AM (1998) Quality of life more than 20 years after repair of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 33:511–515
Koivusalo A, Pakarinen MP, Turunen P, Saarikoski H, Lindahl H, Rintala RJ (2005) Health-related quality of life in adult patients with esophageal atresia—a questionnaire study. J Pediatr Surg 40:307–312
Murshed R, Nicholls G, Spitz L (1999) Intrinsic duodenal obstruction: trends in management and outcome over 45 years (1951–1995) with relevance to prenatal counselling. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:1197–1199
Hancock BJ, Wiseman NE (1989) Congenital duodenal obstruction: the impact of an antenatal diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg 24:1027–1031
Corteville JE, Gray DL, Langer JC (1996) Bowel abnormalities in the fetus—correlation of prenatal ultrasonographic findings with outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:724–729
Altman RP, Randolph JG, Lilly JR (1974) Sacrococcygeal teratoma: American Academy of Pediatrics Surgical Section Survey-1973. J Pediatr Surg 9:389–398
Kirkinen P, Partanen K, Merikanto J, Ryynanen M, Haring P, Heinonen K (1997) Ultrasonic and magnetic resonance imaging of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76:917–922
Chisholm CA, Heider AL, Kuller JA, von Allmen D, McMahon MJ, Chescheir NC (1999) Prenatal diagnosis and perinatal management of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Am J Perinatol 16:47–50
Adzick NS, Crombleholme TM, Morgan MA, Quinn TM (1997) A rapidly growing fetal teratoma. Lancet 349:538
Makin EC, Hyett J, Ade-Ajayi N, Patel S, Nicolaides K, Davenport M (2006) Outcome of antenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratomas: single-center experience (1993–2004). J Pediatr Surg 41:388–393
Brand IR, Kaminopetros P, Cave M, Irving HC, Lilford RJ (1994) Specificity of antenatal ultrasound in the Yorkshire Region: a prospective study of 2261 ultrasound detected anomalies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101:392–397
Chevalier RL (2004) Perinatal obstructive nephropathy. Semin Perinatol 28:124–131
Hubbard AM, Harty MP, States LJ (1999) A new tool for prenatal diagnosis: ultrafast fetal MRI. Semin Perinatol 23:437–447
Steinhart JM, Kuhn JP, Eisenberg B, Vaughan RL, Maggioli AJ, Cozza TF (1988) Ultrasound screening of healthy infants for urinary tract abnormalities. Pediatrics 82:609–614
Woodward M, Frank D (2002) Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis. BJU Int 89:149–156
Fasolato V, Poloniato A, Bianchi C, Spagnolo D, Valsecchi L, Ferrari A, Paesano P, Del Maschio A (1998) Feto-neonatal ultrasonography to detect renal abnormalities: evaluation of 1-year screening program. Am J Perinatol 15:161–164
Kitagawa H, Pringle KC, Stone P, Flower J, Murakami N, Robinson R (1998) Postnatal follow-up of hydronephrosis detected by prenatal ultrasound: the natural history. Fetal Diagn Ther 13:19–25
Riccabona M (2004) Assessment and management of newborn hydronephrosis. World J Urol 22:73–78
Josephson S (2002) Antenatally detected, unilateral dilatation of the renal pelvis: a critical review. 1. Postnatal non-operative treatment 20 years on—is it safe? Scand J Urol Nephrol 36:243–250
Joseph VT (2006) The management of renal conditions in the perinatal period. Early Hum Dev 82:313–324
Reinberg Y, de Castano I, Gonzalez R (1992) Prognosis for patients with prenatally diagnosed posterior urethral valves. J Urol 148:125–126
Walsh DS, Johnson MP (1999) Fetal interventions for obstructive uropathy. Semin Perinatol 23:484–495
Agarwal SK, Fisk NM (2001) In utero therapy for lower urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn 21:970–976
Quintero RA, Shukla AR, Homsy YL, Bukkapatnam R (2000) Successful in utero endoscopic ablation of posterior urethral valves: a new dimension in fetal urology. Urology 55:774
Puri A, Grover VP, Agarwala S, Mitra DK, Bhatnagar V (2002) Initial surgical treatment as a determinant of bladder dysfunction in posterior urethral valves. Pediatr Surg Int 18:438–443
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lakhoo, K. Fetal counselling for congenital malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 23, 509–519 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-1896-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-1896-8