Abstract
Ventricular shunts that require multiple revisions are familiar to pediatric neurosurgeons. We conducted a retrospective study to determine whether patients who require repeated shunt revisions represent a particular cohort within shunted hydrocephalic children. The clinical records of 244 children who had undergone shunt procedures between January 1990 and January 1996 were examined. They were divided into group 1: children with no shunt failure (n=136), group 2: children with one shunt revision (n=52), group 3: children with 2 or 3 shunt revisions (n=34), and group 4: patients who had 4 or more shunt revisions (n=22). Patients in groups 3 and 4 accounted for 54.8% of the total of 531 shunt procedures. Etiology of hydrocephalus, nature of the dysfunction, CSF characteristics, and variables related to the surgical procedure were analyzed for each group. We observed a progressive shortening of the intervals between revisions as the numbers of surgeries increased, indicating that shunts that tended to fail repeatedly did so sooner than those that did not. A Kaplan-Meier shunt survival curve showed that group 2 had a slower rate of failure than either group 3 (χ 2=7.13, P<0.01) or group 4 (χ 2=4.76, P<0.05). The etiologies of the hydrocephalus were not randomly distributed among the four groups (χ 2=81.4, P<0.001); there was a predominance of congenital conditions in group 1. Repeated shunt revisions were associated with a progressive increase in the concentration of monocytes in the CSF (Kruskal-Wallis, P<0.05). Our data suggest that multiple shunt revisions constitute a phenomenon that may be caused by specific, still unidentified, biological factors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 15 January 1998
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lazareff, J., Peacock, W., Holly, L. et al. Multiple shunt failures: an analysis of relevant factors. Child's Nerv Syst 14, 271–275 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003810050223
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003810050223