Abstract
Introduction
The bones of the skull of the newborn and nursing infants, in general, possess great malleability. For this reason, the depressed fractures occurring at this age are called “Ping Pong” or “Green Stick” fractures. The treatment of these fractures is surgical according to different authors, although some of these fractures that happen in childbirth can elevate themselves spontaneously.
Technique
A breast milk extractor trade mark “MEDEVA” was used for the procedure in newborns with a depression larger than 2 cm in diameter. Minimal aspiration was performed while observing the elevation through the transparent breast milk extractor MEDEVA until the depression elevated without leaving any trace.
Discussion
The aspiration procedure was satisfactory and curative in the five children treated. The fracture was successfully elevated and the skull returned to its normal position and configuration without complications for the patients.
Conclusion
Finally, it has been demonstrated that this procedure is simple, inexpensive, and avoids surgical intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Depressed fractures of the cranial vault in children under 1 year of age are different from those that occur in older children and adults. This difference is due to the relative plasticity of the infantile skull, which is not completely ossified.
The bones of the skull of the newborn and nursing infants, in general, possess great malleability. For this reason, the depressed fractures occurring at this age are called “Ping Pong” or “Green Stick” fractures. These terms describe nothing more than the conversion of the normal convex surface of the cranium to a concave one secondary to trauma. It is possible for these fractures to lacerate the underlying brain.
Congenital depressions of the skull have an incidence of 1/10,000 births. These are reported to be caused by the pressure of the fingers or wrists of the neonate over the surface of the cranium in-uterus. The diagnosis is always made in the postpartum period.
Acquired depressed skull fractures are generally related to obstetrical maneuvers during difficult deliveries. These depressions in the patient’s skull are produced by two different mechanisms. First, those caused by deformation without fracture and second, those caused by a fracture accompanying the depression. The type of fracture that prompted this study is the second.
The treatment of these fractures is controversial. According to different authors, surgical or conservative treatment may be used. It is also suggested that those fractures that occur at the moment of birth may elevate themselves spontaneously shortly after birth [10, 11, 13]. Prompt elevation is necessary because after 72 h the bone becomes more difficult to elevate.
It is the experience of our teachers and our own observations that pressure above the angle of the depression may elevate it. We have performed the manipulation with the fingers seeking the most prominent spot and applying pressure; in some cases, this reduces the fracture. This technique is somewhat difficult and may produce additional trauma to the malleable skull and soft tissues in the newborn.
International studies report successful treatment [6] using obstetrical extractors [1, 5, 12, 15, 16]. But in our center and in our country, the use of this procedure has not been reported.
Until now, with the exception of a few cases where the fracture was elevated by the manual procedure described previously, all the children were taken to the operating room and surgical intervention was performed under general anesthesia.
With the goal of avoiding performing surgical procedures under anesthesia for these fractures and using the experience of others in elevating these fractures by suction, we have developed a method of elevation by suction, which has been effective and low-risk. These suction devices, which are used to extract the milk from those mothers who are unable to nurse the baby directly, are manufactured with constant refinements. One of the recent models is used for this procedure.
Materials and methods
We applied this procedure in the neurosurgery and neonatology departments of our hospital between the months of September 2003 and February 2005.
This sample consisted of 4 neonates less than 72 h of age and 1 nursing infant of 5 months, 3 females and 2 males. All patients had a traumatic history in the peripartum period except for one delivered by cesarean section. All of the children were of normal weight and full term with normal neurological examinations. During an observation period of 48 h postpartum, the fractures had not elevated spontaneously [17, 18]. The location of the fracture was verified and the scalp was shaved for an area sufficient to supply the vacuum extractor. The shaving and preparation of the scalp is necessary because in the newborn the scalp and hair are quite oily and it is difficult to attain an adequate seal for the device. Hematological and coagulation studies were performed to confirm normal values. The procedure was explained to the parents and an informed consent was obtained. Cranial ultrasound was performed and brain lesions were not seen beneath the fracture.
The objective of the study was to demonstrate the validity of a procedure that could be performed with minimal risk to the patient by avoiding a surgical intervention under general anesthesia.
Technique
A breast milk extractor trade mark “MEDEVA” (Fig. 1) was used for the procedure in those children with a depression larger than 2 cm (Fig. 2) in diameter who had a benign clinical course, excellent general and neurological examinations, and had radiographs of the skull (Fig. 3) confirming the fracture and establishing that the fracture was not comminuted, rather a Green Stick fracture due to the immature state of the bone.
In these patients, elevation of the Ping Pong fracture was performed by locating the central part of the extractor over the central part of the fracture and molding the border so that it was airtight (Fig. 1).
Minimal aspiration was performed while observing the elevation through the transparent breast milk extractor MEDEVA until the depression elevated without leaving any trace (Fig. 4). After the procedure, diagnostic ultrasound was performed to assure the absence of intracranial injury produced by the procedure.
The patients were observed in the hospital for the first 24 h and discharged. They were followed-up weekly for 2 weeks and then monthly until 1 year of age. All children had an electroencephalogram (EEG) at 6 months after the procedure. Routine clinical follow-up consisted of general examination, head circumference measurements, and evaluation of psychomotor evaluation until 1 year of age.
Discussion
The aspiration procedure was satisfactory and curative in the five children treated. The fracture was successfully elevated and the skull returned to its normal position and configuration without complications for the patients.
The 18 months follow-up period has been with good progression of psychomotor development and quality of life for the 5 treated patients. There were no complications during the procedure or in the follow-up period for these cases in contradistinction to the international studies, which report diverse complications of the use of obstetrical suction devices [2–4, 7–9, 13, 19]. This procedure avoids infection, the formation of hematomas, and the loss of blood, which are the most common complications of open surgery.
The applied method has demonstrated its safety and accomplished its principal mission, which is to avoid subjecting neonates to a surgical intervention under general anesthesia with the risks of sepsis, bleeding, and hypothermia, and avoiding a residual surgical scar.
We think that the milk extractor MEDEVA is superior to other obstetrical suction devices for the elevation of depressed skull fractures in neonates and nursing infants. This device requires lower pressure, is more easily controlled than other devices, and, furthermore, possesses a transparent seal that permits observation during the procedure of the elevation of the fracture. Because of these factors, it is possible to avoid the complications reported with the use of other devices.
It is our opinion that these fractures should be treated within the first 72 h because the bone becomes more difficult to elevate after this time. We believe that elevation is beneficial.
Conclusions
Finally, it has been demonstrated that this procedure is simple, inexpensive, and avoids surgical intervention. The use of this technique reduces the length of hospital stay of these children to at least 24 h and avoids unnecessary cannulation of peripheral veins or umbilical catheterization and the risks that these bring.
The social effect of this procedure in addition to the conservation of resources and the reduction of risks to a minimum prevents familial stress and provides the tranquility necessary for the mother to breast-feed the baby.
References
Bhat BV, Kumar A, Oumachigui A (1994) Bone injuries during delivery. Indian J Pediatr 61(4):401–405
Captier G, Lebarazer M, Bigorre M, Leboucq N, Montoya P (1999) Congenital skull depression. Report of 2 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 44(3):266–271 (Article in French)
Curry DJ, Frim DM (1999) Delayed repair of open depressed skull fracture. Pediatr Neurosurg 31(6):294–297
Dupuis O, Silveira R, Redarce T, Dittmar A, Rudigoz RC (2003) Instrumental extraction in 2002 in the “AURORE” hospital network: incidence and serious neonatal complications. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 31(11):920–926 (Article in French)
Ersahin Y, Mutluer S, Mirzai H, Palali I (1996) Pediatric depressed skull fractures: analysis of 530 cases. Childs Nerv Syst 12(6):323–331
Govaert P, Vanhaesebrouck P, De Praeter C, Moens K, Leroy J (1992) Vacuum extraction, bone injury and neonatal subgaleal bleeding. Eur J Pediatr 151(7):532–535
Harpold TL, McComb JG, Levy ML (1998) Neonatal neurosurgical trauma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 9(1):141–154
Hes R, de Jong TH, Paz y Geuze DH, Avezaat CJ (1997) Rapid evolution of a growing skull fracture after vacuum extraction in case of fetal hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 26(5):269–274
Hickey K, McKenna P (1996) Skull fracture caused by vacuum extraction. Obstet Gynecol 88(4 Pt 2):671–673
Lim CT, Koh MT, Sivanesaratnam V (1991) Depressed skull fracture in a newborn successfully managed conservatively: a case report. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 17(3):227–229
Martinez-Lage Sanchez JF, Poza Poza M, Almagro Navarro MJ, Rodriguez Costa T, Casas Fernandez C, Puche Mira A (1991) Depressed skull fracture in the newborn infant. To operate or not? An Esp Pediatr 35(1):7–11 (Article in Spanish)
Nadas S, Gudinchet F, Capasso P, Reinberg O (1993) Predisposing factors in obstetrical fractures. Skeletal Radiol 22(3):195–198
Paul MA, Fahner T (1991) Closed depressed skull fracture in childhood reduced with suction cup method: case report. J Trauma 31(11):1551–1552
Pollak L, Raziel A, Ariely S, Schiffer J (1999) Revival of non-surgical management of neonatal depressed skull fractures. J Paediatr Child Health 35(1):96–97
Tannirandorn Y, Thaithumyanon P, Aroonrasmeruang T (1993) Elevation of depressed skull fracture in the neonate by obstetrical vacuum extractor. J Med Assoc Thai 76(12):698–702
Tysvaer A, Nysted A (1994) Depression fractures of the skull in newborn infants. Treatment with vacuum extractor. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 114(28):3315–3316 (Article in Norwegian)
Ubhi T, Reece A, Craig A (2000) Congenital skull fracture as a presentation of Menkes disease. Dev Med Child Neurol 42(5):347–348
Vidal Mico S, Lopez Navarro MC, Tellez de Meneses M, Alvarez Garijo JA, Perez Aytes A (2001) Spontaneous resolution of a congenital depressed skull fracture. An Esp Pediatr 54(1):78–80 (Article in Spanish)
Wheeler DS, Shope TR (1997) Depressed skull fracture in a 7-month-old who fell from bed. Pediatrics 100(6):1033–1034
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mastrapa, T.L., Fernandez, L.A., Alvarez, M.D. et al. Depressed skull fracture in Ping Pong: elevation with Medeva extractor. Childs Nerv Syst 23, 787–790 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-0354-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-0354-1