Abstract
Introduction
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) for the treatment of hydrocephalus of different etiologies is still controversial in children younger than 2 years of age. The success rate of ETV in this group of patients is analyzed in this study.
Materials and methods
The series consisted of 21 patients treated with ETV. The mean age of the patients was 6.7 months, ranging from 9 days to 15 months (16 patients were younger than 1 year). The study included hydrocephalus due to idiopathic aqueductal stenosis (eight) and other congenital anomalies (four) as well as posthemorrhagic (three) and tumor-related occlusive hydrocephalus (three). Two patients presented with shunt infection and one with a shunt failure. ETV was considered to be successful when shunting could be avoided.
Results
ETV was successful in nine patients, with a mean follow-up period of 26.2 months. The procedure was successful in four patients with idiopathic aqueductal stenosis, in two with other congenital anomalies, in one posthemorrhagic, and in two with a tumor-related hydrocephalus. In 12 patients, the ETV was unsuccessful after a mean follow-up of 3.3 months. These patients required a shunt. Ten of them were less than 1 year old when ETV was performed. In one tumor-related hydrocephalus, a shunt was inserted after a meningitis after tumor removal.
Conclusions
The success of ETV in children younger than 2 years of age suffering from non-communicating hydrocephalus seems to be dependent on both age and etiology. Our results show an overall success rate of 43%. In 37.5% of the children younger than 1 year of age, ETV was successful. ETV in patients with hydrocephalus due to idiopathic aqueductal stenosis seems to be more beneficial than in other causes of hydrocephalus.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has already become the therapy of choice for the treatment of non-communicating hydrocephalus [1–5]. The experiences with ETV in adults are continuously increasing and reveal a favorable outcome for most of these patients [6–10]. However, the success rate differs in very young children from older patients. In children younger than 2 years of age and particularly in infants, controversies exist whether ETV might be superior to shunt placement or not. Most studies report a lower success rate of ETV in this group of patients [11–14]). There is an ongoing discussion whether age or etiology of the hydrocephalus or both influence the outcome [15–19]. In our retrospective study, we analyzed the data of 21 patients younger than 2 years of age treated with ETV.
Materials and methods
Between December 1994 and December 2004, 21 patients younger than 2 years of age presenting with non-communicating hydrocephalus were admitted to our department and underwent ETV. The study included 6 girls and 15 boys ranging in age from 9 days to 15 months, with an average age of 6.7 months. Sixteen patients were younger than 1 year of age. ETV was considered when preoperative imaging studies revealed a non-communicating hydrocephalus. The etiology of the hydrocephalus was idiopathic aqueductal stenosis in eight patients (one patient with failed endoscopic aqueductoplasty), other congenital anomalies in four, posthemorrhagic in three, and tumor-related in three. Three patients had previously been treated with a shunt. Two presented with a shunt infection and one with a shunt failure. During the follow-up period, neurodiagnostic imaging (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound) as well as clinical data including head circumference or fontanel bulging were studied. ETV was considered to be successful when shunting could be avoided.
Results
ETV was successful in nine patients (43%), with a mean follow-up period of 26.2 months (ranging from 3 to 55 months). The procedure was successful in four patients with idiopathic aqueductal stenosis, in two with other congenital anomalies, in one posthemorrhagic, and in two with a tumor-related hydrocephalus. In the patient who had previously been treated with endoscopic aqueductoplasty, a successful ETV could be performed. In 12 patients, the ETV was unsuccessful after a mean follow-up of 3.3 months (ranging between 13 days and 16 months). These patients required a shunt. Ten of them were less than 1 year old when ETV was performed. A failed procedure was more frequent in the group of patients younger than 6 months of age. In one initially successfully treated tumor-related hydrocephalus, a shunt had to be inserted because a meningitis occurred after tumor removal. In one patient, a subdural hygroma occurred 1 month after ETV. It was treated with a subdural–peritoneal shunt. There was no permanent morbidity or mortality after the procedure.
The distribution of age at the time of ETV according to the number of successful and unsuccessful treated patients is shown in Fig. 1. Table 1 indicates the different groups of etiology of the hydrocephalus concerning success and failure of ETV. The relationship between age and success of ETV seems to play a role in cases with idiopathic aqueductal stenosis. We found more unsatisfactory results for children within the first month of life (three of four patients). The entire relation for all patients (age, etiology of hydrocephalus, success/failure of ETV) is demonstrated in Table 2. A patient with a typical idiopathic aqueductal stenosis and hydrocephalus is presented in Fig. 2.
Discussion
Although ETV has been established as a procedure to avoid shunt placement in patients with hydrocephalus of different etiologies, its use in children younger than 2 years of age still remains controversial. Our overall results show a success rate of 43%. Beems and Grotenhuis [12] reported a success rate of 53% in 66 ETV performed in children less than 2 years old. Finally, they divided the cohort of their patients into subgroups with respect to etiology of the hydrocephalus and found a variation of successful outcome from 27% in myelomeningocele to 87% in aqueductal stenosis. Therefore, they stated that the success of ETV mainly depends on the etiology of hydrocephalus, but not on the age of the patient. Their results are supported by some other authors who did not find any impact of age either [16, 18, 19]. In contrast, Kim et al. [17] found a poor surgical outcome in children younger than 1 year old, but were not aware of an influence of etiology. Reflecting our results, we agree with Koch and Wagner [13], Gorayeb et al. [14], and Fritsch et al. [20] that both features have to be considered as predictors of an acceptable outcome. The critical age in our study was younger than 6 months old because the highest failure rate was observed in this group of children. However, the role of etiology should not be underestimated. Several studies have shown promising results of ETV in infants with hydrocephalus due to idiopathic aqueductal stenosis. The success rate generally corresponds with an average of 50 to 70% for this kind of hydrocephalus. Recently presented data by Fritsch et al. [20] of a large German multicenter study of 58 infants with pure aqueductal stenosis have shown a success rate of 50% after a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
Secondary aqueductal stenosis with associated hydrocephalus caused by hemorrhage, central nervous system infections, or malformations represent a group with a lower success rate after neuroendoscopic therapy in infants [11]. In our opinion, there exists predominantly a malresorptive and not an obstructive problem of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation, which is responsible for a higher failure rate after ETV. Reobstruction of the stoma as a result of newly developed arachnoid membranes might be one of the problems of failed ETV especially in posthemorrhagic or postmeningitic hydrocephalus [13, 21]. Another cause of hydrocephalus has not been mentioned yet in this paper. These are children with tumors of the posterior fossa including the brainstem and associated hydrocephalus. There is obviously an obstructive origin of the hydrocephalus, which leads to good results after ETV. Moreover, postoperative hydrocephalus after tumor removal is often a problem of obstruction of the fourth ventricle outflow or aqueduct. Both groups can be successfully treated by ETV [22–24].
Conclusion
The success of ETV in children younger than 2 years of age suffering from non-communicating hydrocephalus seems to be dependent on both age and etiology. A failure of ETV occurred more often in infants younger than 6 months of age. Idiopathic aqueductal stenosis with associated hydrocephalus showed a good outcome in 50% of the patients. This success rate corresponds with other studies. Although the results of ETV in the treatment of hydrocephalus other than aqueductal stenosis do not show convincing results in our series, we recommend the procedure as the first choice of therapy in most of the children with non-communicating hydrocephalus regardless of age even in premature newborns. In premature newborns, each week without a shunt is a considerable benefit for these patients. The higher rate of complications and revisions after CSF shunting justifies this procedure as an initial step. However, clear evidence of how successful ETV will be in this group of children requires further prospective studies. A clinical and neuropsychological assessment has to be included in the long-term examinations. It is of great interest whether the persistent enlargement of the ventricles after ETV interferes with a good mental development of the patients compared with shunted patients in whom the ventricles are usually small or even collapsed.
References
Jones RF, Stening WA, Brydon M (1990) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 26:86–92
Jones RF, Kwok BC, Stening WA, Vonau M (1994) The current status of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of non-communicating hydrocephalus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 37:28–36
Kunz U, Goldmann A, Bader C, Waldbauer H, Oldenkott P (1994) Endoscopic fenestration of the 3rd ventricular floor in aqueductal stenosis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 37:42–47
Teo C (1998) Third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus: experience with more than 120 cases. In: Hellwig D, Bauer BL (eds) Minimally invasive techniques for neurosurgery. Springer, Berlin, pp 73–76
Hellwig D, Grotenhuis JA, Tirakotai W, Riegel T, Schulte DM, Bauer BL, Bertalanffy H (2005) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Rev 28:1–34
Brockmeyer D, Abtin K, Carey L, Walker ML (1998) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: an outcome analysis. Pediatr Neurosurg 28:236–240
Gangemi M, Donati P, Maiuri F, Longatti P, Godano U, Mascari C (1999) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 42:128–132
Schroeder HWS, Niendorf WR, Gaab MR (2002) Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 96:1032–1040
Beems T, Grotenhuis JA (2004) Long-term complications and definition of failure of neuroendoscopic procedures. Childs Nerv Syst 20:868–877
Kadrian D, van Gelder J, Florida D, Jones R, Vonau M, Teo C, Stening W, Kwok B (2005) Long-term reliability of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 56:1271–1278 (discussion 1278)
Buxton N, MacArthur D, Mallucci C, Punt J, Vloeberghs M (1998) Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients less than one year old. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:73–76
Beems T, Grotenhuis JA (2002) Is the success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy age-dependent? An analysis of the results of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children. Childs Nerv Syst 18:605–608
Koch D, Wagner W (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants of less than 1 year of age: which factors influence outcome. Childs Nerv Syst 20:405–411
Gorayeb RP, Cavalheiro S, Zymberg ST (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children younger than 1 year of age. J Neurosurg (Pediatrics) 100:427–429
Teo C, Jones R (1996) Management of hydrocephalus by endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 25:57–63
Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Chumas P, Zerah M, Brunelle F, Lot G, Pierre-Kahn A, Renier D (1999) Failure of third ventriculostomy in the treatment of aqueductal stenosis in children. J Neurosurg 90:448–454
Kim SK, Wang KC, Cho BK (2000) Surgical outcome of pediatric hydrocephalus treated by endoscopic III ventriculostomy: prognostic factors and interpretation of postoperative neuroimaging. Childs Nerv Syst 16:161–169
Elbabaa SK, Steinmetz M, Ross J, Moon D, Luciano MG (2001) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus in the pediatric population: evaluation of outcome. Eur J Pediatr Surg 11(Suppl 1):S52–S54 (411)
Javadpour M, Mallucci C, Brodbelt A, Golash A, May P (2001) The impact of endoscopic third ventriculostomy on the management of newly diagnosed hydrocephalus in infants. Pediatr Neurosurg 35:188–194
Fritsch MJ, Kehler U, Joedicke A, Boschert J, Wagner W (2005) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants under one year of age: a German multicenter study. Childs Nerv Syst 21:495 (data presented at the Third World Meeting of the ISGNE in Marburg 2005)
Hayashi N, Hamada H, Hirashima Y, Kurimoto M, Takaku A, Endo S (2000) Clinical features in patients requiring reoperation after failed endoscopic procedures for hydrocephalus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 43:181–186
Sainte-Rose C, Cinalli G, Roux FE, Maixner R, Chumas PD, Mansour M, Carpentier A, Bourgeois M, Zerah M, Pierre- Kahn A, Renier D (2001) Management of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors: the role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 95:791–797
Wellons JC III, Tubbs RS, Banks JT, Grabb B, Blont JP, Oakes WJ, Grabb PA (2002) Long-term control of hydrocephalus via endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children with tectal plate gliomas. Neurosurgery 51:63–67
Ruggiero C, Cinalli G, Spennato P, Aliberti F, Cianciulli E, Trischitta V, Maggi G (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus in posterior fossa tumors in children. Childs Nerv Syst 20:828–833
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baldauf, J., Oertel, J., Gaab, M.R. et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children younger than 2 years of age. Childs Nerv Syst 23, 623–626 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-0335-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-0335-4