Abstract
The electric organ (EO) of weakly electric mormyrids consists of flat, disk-shaped electrocytes with distinct anterior and posterior faces. There are multiple species-characteristic patterns in the geometry of the electrocytes and their innervation. To further correlate electric organ discharge (EOD) with EO anatomy, we examined four species of the mormyrid genus Campylomormyrus possessing clearly distinct EODs. In C. compressirostris, C. numenius, and C. tshokwe, all of which display biphasic EODs, the posterior face of the electrocytes forms evaginations merging to a stalk system receiving the innervation. In C. tamandua that emits a triphasic EOD, the small stalks of the electrocyte penetrate the electrocyte anteriorly before merging on the anterior side to receive the innervation. Additional differences in electrocyte anatomy among the former three species with the same EO geometry could be associated with further characteristics of their EODs. Furthermore, in C. numenius, ontogenetic changes in EO anatomy correlate with profound changes in the EOD. In the juvenile the anterior face of the electrocyte is smooth, whereas in the adult it exhibits pronounced surface foldings. This anatomical difference, together with disparities in the degree of stalk furcation, probably contributes to the about 12 times longer EOD in the adult.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The electric organ (EO) of a mormyrid fish was first described on the basis of Mormyrus longipinnis (Rüppel 1832). Since then, many studies have been devoted to the anatomy and physiology of this specialized tissue, which is capable of producing weak electric discharges (Marcusen 1864; Ogneff 1898; Schlichter 1906; Szabo 1956, 1957, 1958; Lissmann 1958; Bennett and Grundfest 1961; Bennett 1970, 1971; Bruns 1971; Schwartz et al. 1975; Bell et al. 1976; Bass 1986; Bass et al. 1986). Mormyrids utilize their weak electric sense for electrolocation (Von der Emde and Ringer 1992; Von der Emde 1999, 2006), foraging (Von der Emde and Bleckmann 1998; Von der Emde and Schwarz 2002) and social communication (Moller 1970; Hopkins and Bass 1981; Kramer and Kuhn 1994; Kramer 1996).
In adult Mormyridae, the EO is confined to the caudal peduncle of the fish. It is built up of electrocytes, which are apparently derived from skeletal muscle fibers (Szabo 1960, 1961). Detailed ontogenetic studies, however, have shown that the electrocytes of the adult organ differentiate into the adult structure without passing through a typical muscle fiber stage (Kirschbaum 1977, 1982). They are characterized by their flat, disk-shaped appearance resulting in a clear orientation toward the longitudinal body axis (Denizot et al. 1982). Usually, the posterior face of the thin electrocyte possesses a number of evaginations, called stalks, which either fuse into one or several major stalks on their site of origin (posterior) or penetrate the cell and merge at the anterior site to form the major stalk(s) (see Bass 1986 for examples). Each major stalk is innervated by electromotor neurons of the spinal cord, or, more precisely, each major stalk is in contact with numerous synapses of the neuron (Denizot et al. 1982). The stalk induces the activation of the innervated face of the electrocyte by propagating action potentials along its branches (Bennett and Grundfest 1961), whereas the initial command for the activation originates from a command nucleus located in the medulla oblongata (Bell et al. 1983; Grant et al. 1986). However, through joint excitation of all electrocytes, the single cell currents summate to a weak electric field measurable externally from the fish. The waveform of such an electric pulse is called an electric organ discharge (EOD). The waveform and patterning of the EODs are often species specific (Hopkins 1981; Hopkins and Bass 1981; Kramer and Kuhn 1994; Feulner et al. 2008). Consequently, this trait is a useful tool for the identification of otherwise cryptic species (Hopkins 1999), especially since the Mormyridae encompass more than 200 species in 19 genera arisen from an adaptive radiation (Sullivan et al. 2000), which is probably still ongoing.
Bass (1986) introduced the term “electrocyte geometry” to characterize the pattern of electrocyte organization, i.e., presence or absence of a penetrating stalk. His study supported a correlation between a certain electrocyte geometry and the number and polarity of the EOD’s phases, as proposed before by Bennett and Grundfest (1961). Five basic electrocyte types with regard to geometry of the stalk system and site of origin of the stalks can be distinguished in mormyrids and each correlates with certain EOD characteristics (reviewed in Hopkins 1999). The site of innervation was found to crucially define the polarity of the first EOD phase (Bennett and Grundfest 1961; Bass 1986). Biphasic EODs, e.g., often correlate with innervation on the posterior face of the electrocyte (non-penetrating stalk, referred to as NPp type), whereas triphasic EODs are often associated with anterior innervation of the electrocyte (penetrating stalks; referred to as Pa type).
Furthermore, also many other architectural features of the electrocyte (e.g., degree of proliferation of the anterior face, thickness of the electrocyte or size of the stalks) could be explicitly correlated with differences in EOD waveform and duration (Bass 1986; Bass et al. 1986; Freedman et al. 1989; Alves-Gomes and Hopkins 1997). Hence, there are—despite a common general organization of the EO in all members of Mormyridae—numerous aspects in which EOs can be different among and even within species, opening up several areas of research: (1) the diversity of electrocyte fine anatomy (e.g., the organization and structure of anterior and posterior faces or electrocyte geometry; see Bass 1986); (2) EO physiology, i.e., how the EOD is produced is variable even among closely related species (Bennett and Grundfest 1961; Bennett 1971); (3) developmental changes, i.e., EOs can undergo anatomical changes during a species’ ontogeny with corresponding changes in EOD waveform and duration (Cheng 2012); (4) sexual dimorphism, i.e., EOs can change with sexual maturation leading to sexually dimorphic EOD with respect to waveform and/or duration (Hopkins 1980, 1981; Westby and Kirschbaum 1982; Bass and Hopkins 1985; Landsman 1993; Friedman and Hopkins 1996).
In our study, we address the first three of these four topics by examining the EO anatomy within the mormyrid genus Campylomormyrus. Among the 14 described species of this genus (Taverne 1972), there is an extraordinary diversity of EODs with respect to waveform and duration (Hopkins 1999; Feulner et al. 2008). Moreover, recent phylogenetic studies revealed that especially closely related species evolved strikingly different EODs (Feulner et al. 2008).
We examined the EODs and conducted histological examinations of the adult EO of C. compressirostris, C. tamandua, C. tshokwe and C. numenius. Our first goal was to investigate whether the observed differences in EOD are reflected in the anatomical organization of the EO.
Our second goal was to investigate how ontogenetic changes in the EOD correlate with ontogenetic changes in EO morphology. To shed light on this topic we have chosen the species C. numenius, for which we were able to document the development of both the EO and the EOD.
Materials and methods
The EOs of four Campylomormyrus species (see Table 1) were used for anatomical examinations via light microscopy and in situ dissection. For preparation of the histological slides, the fish were euthanized by an overdose of phenylethanol and the caudal peduncle was cut off. The part containing the adult EO was partitioned into a cranial and a caudal fraction. The tissue was fixed by immersion in Bouin’s solution or in 4 % formalin, decalcified in the case of formalin fixation with 7.5 % EDTA (pH 7.4), dehydrated and embedded in paraffin following conventional techniques (Mulisch and Welsch 2010). The rostral part of the EO of each specimen was sectioned serially at 4–6 µm in the transverse plane, whereas the caudal portion was sectioned serially at 4–6 µm in the sagittal plane using a Leica 2035 Biocut microtome. Sections were mounted on glycerin/albumin-coated slides. Following deparaffinization and rehydration, sections were stained with Azan or HE (Mulisch and Welsch 2010), dehydrated and coverslipped with DePeX mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich).
The sections were investigated with a Leica microscope DM4000B. Pictures were taken and processed by using the Leica DFC 480 camera together with the Leica IM software version 4.0. Morphometric measurements of electrocytes were taken with the tpsDig software version 2.17 (Rohlf 2013).
For the in situ dissection, skin was carefully removed from the part of the tail containing the EO and the number of electrocytes was determined either via macrophotography (Canon EOS 100D) or through inspection by eye.
Additionally, to analyze species-specific EOD characteristics, we used the EOD recordings from 82 animals caught in the wild during field trips to the Congo basin near Brazzaville in 2004, 2006 and 2012 (see Table 2). For EOD recordings in the field, the fish were held in a small plastic aquarium, 45 cm × 15 cm in size, filled with Congo stream water (conductivity: 40–70 µS/cm, temperature: 24–26 °C). The tank featured a compartment adjustable in size used to prevent the fish from freely swimming during the measurements. Stainless steel electrodes (V2A) were positioned at the rostral and caudal end of the fish with a distance of a few centimeters from the fish—the positive electrode was positioned next to the head. The EOD waveforms were displayed and recorded by a Tektronix TDS 3012B digital phosphor oscilloscope (sampling rate: 10 kHz; 9 bit vertical resolution) with a Tektronix ADA 400A differential preamplifier (variable gain from 0.1× up to 100×; bandwidth 100 Hz–1 MHz). The oscilloscope and preamplifier were AC coupled. The EOD data were transferred onto the hard drive of a computer via floppy disks. Per individual, one representative EOD was analyzed.
Five EOD characteristics were measured with a custom-made MATLAB script: the duration and relative amplitude of the two main phases (maximum and minimum), frequency as well as amplitude of the peak of the fast Fourier transformation (FFT) and the number of phases including the optional pre- and post-phase (before or after the main positive and negative phase, not exhibited by all species). The first and last 2 % deviation from the peak-to-peak amplitude was taken as the starting and end point of each EOD.
Results
Characteristics of the adult electric organ discharge in C. compressirostris, C. tamandua, C. tshokwe and C. numenius
Figure 1 shows our four focus species of the genus Campylomormyrus and their adult EODs. The 82 examined EODs display no sexual dimorphism within any of the four species. However, potential seasonal dimorphisms have not been evaluated, as fish were only recorded once during the dry season. C. compressirostris exhibits a brief, biphasic EOD [average duration = 164.9 ± 15.49 (SD) µs, n = 31; see Fig. 1a]—the first phase of the EOD waveform is head positive followed by a second head-negative phase (Fig. 1b). The amplitudes of the head-positive peak (P; see Fig. 1i) and the head-negative peak (N) have an average ratio of 0.57 (SD = 0.039).
The EOD of C. tamandua is brief and basically triphasic (average duration = 315.9 ± 99.75 µs, n = 10; see Fig. 1c), i.e., it starts with a small head-negative pre-phase (Fig. 1d, arrow) followed by the main head-positive and head-negative phases. However, sometimes also a weak head-positive post-phase can be present (observed in 6 of the 10 analyzed individuals). The amplitude ratio of P/N is on average 0.59 (SD = 0.044).
In C. numenius, the EOD is biphasic and of very long duration (i.e., on average 25.4 ± 3.28 ms, n = 3; see Fig. 1e). The rising portion of the head-positive phase has a step-like inflection point (Fig. 1f, asterisk) and the P/N ratio is on average 1.23 (SD = 0.339).
C. tshokwe possesses a biphasic EOD (average duration = 3.7 ± 1.06 ms, n = 15; see Fig. 1g). Uniquely among the species analyzed here, the EOD of C. tshokwe rises steeply and is followed by a weaker and prolonged head-negative phase (on average more than twice as long as the head-positive phase; Fig. 1d). The P/N ratio is on average 9.49 (SD = 5.853).
Utilizing 82 EODs recorded in the wild, we additionally characterized species-specific differences across the four species (see Online Resource 1 for output of the MATLAB script). An analysis of four EOD characteristics demonstrated that EODs were significantly differentiated across the four species (MANOVA, Wilks, p < 0.001) (see also Fig. 2). No sex-specific differences between adults have been detected, while C. numenius showed significant differences between size groups with regard to EOD duration [juvenile 11 cm (n = 8), juvenile 12–22 cm (n = 15), females 33–44 cm (n = 2), males 32 cm (n = 1), ANOVA, p < 0.001]. Evaluating the different EOD characteristics by linear regressions revealed two correlations with total body length (a proxy for age), i.e., EOD duration in C. numenius (see Fig. 3a, b; p < 0.001) and relative amplitude of the two main peaks in C. tshokwe (see Fig. 3a, c; p = 0.015).
Anatomical characterization of the adult electric organ in Campylomormyrus
The four species of the genus Campylomormyrus possess an adult EO that conforms to the basic mormyrid bauplan as described, e.g., Marcusen (1864). As illustrated for C. compressirostris in Fig. 4, four columns of electrocytes surround the vertebral column between the posterior edge of the dorsal fin to the beginning of the caudal fin—a dorsal and a ventral column on each side. Each column contains a large population of regularly spaced, flat electrocytes (see Table 1 for details about absolute numbers) that are stacked behind each other and each column is enveloped in a connective tissue tube. Each electrocyte again is situated in a compartment that is confined by septa of connective tissue. In cross sections, the electrocyte’s shape in the four species of Campylomormyrus ranges from almost round to kidney shaped and their absolute size varies according to the size of the fish. The diameter of the electrocytes is always about two orders of magnitude larger than the thickness, resulting in the typical disk-shaped appearance (Fig. 4d). Each electrocyte is characterized by distinguishable faces: the rostral membrane is referred to as the anterior face and the caudal membrane as the posterior face.
The evaginations of the electrocyte building the stalk system always originate on the posterior face in the four species. These stalks fuse repeatedly to become one major stalk. However, the branching pattern (number of fusions) and electrocyte geometry vary—in part considerably—among species (see the subsequent section).
In the following we describe the anatomical details of the electrocytes observed in sagittal and cross sections. The sagittal plane S1 (Fig. 4c) shows the electric organ in a lateral region, whereas the sagittal plane S2 shows a more medial aspect of the electric organ close to the spinal cord where the axon bundles of the electromotor neurons are in contact with the stalks.
General organization of the electrocytes in Campylomormyrus
Campylomormyrus compressirostris
The EO of this species is built up of rather straight electrocytes running in parallel as seen in the parasagittal lateral section (Fig. 5a). The electrocyte’s main body is relatively thin in its central region [6–11 µm, mean = 8.6 ± 1.8 (SD) µm, n = 25] and becomes thicker toward the dorsal and ventral periphery, where it measures on average 26.8 µm (n = 25, SD = 4.8). This increase in thickness is accompanied by a bending of the border area of the electrocytes, such that the surface area of the cell in this region is enlarged (Figs. 5a, 6a). This establishes a tight contact with the connective tissue, which surrounds each electrocyte.
The connective tissue septum constituting the boundary of each electrocyte’s compartment is located closer to the anterior face than to the posterior face of the electrocyte (Figs. 5a, 6a). The space caudal to each electrocyte is filled with thin irregularly shaped stalks, which originate on the posterior face (Figs. 5a, 6a, b). These stalks soon fuse to become stalks of higher degree until they finally merge into one major stalk of large diameter. Except for the arising stalks, both faces of the electrocyte are smooth and exhibit no further proliferations or evaginations.
Campylomormyrus tamandua
In sagittal view the electrocytes have a wave-like appearance with sharp bends in regions where the small stalks penetrate the cell (Fig. 5b). The stalks originate on the posterior face of the electrocyte, but after merging to variable degree they turn anteriorly and penetrate the electrocyte (Fig. 6c, d). At the anterior face the stalks fuse to become stalks of higher degree (Fig. 6d) until they finally all merge into a major stalk of large diameter. The penetrations seem to be more numerous at the periphery of the electrocyte than in the center (Fig. 5b).
The electrocytes vary in thickness from 5 to 15 µm (mean = 8.6 ± 2.2 µm, n = 25). At the periphery, the electrocytes bend and run partially parallel to the surrounding connective tissue tube (Fig. 6c). The electrocytes are located in the center of the connective tissue compartments. The stalks originate on the posterior face of the electrocyte, while the major stalk is located anterior to the electrocyte.
Campylomormyrus numenius
This species exhibits straight electrocytes, with almost perfect parallel arrangement seen in the sagittal view (Fig. 5c). Numerous thin stalks arise at almost 90° angle from the posterior face of the cell. In contrast to C. compressirostris and C. tamandua, they fuse regularly, thereby forming a highly branched stalk system of alveolar-like appearance. A major stalk is not formed before the stalks reach the processes of the spinal nerve. The connective tissue around each electrocyte is located very close to the anterior face of the electrocyte, thus giving sufficient space for the long and straight stalks on the posterior face (Fig. 5c). A further characteristic feature of C. numenius’ EO is the pronounced proliferation of the anterior surface of the electrocytes by numerous evaginations (we refer to them as papillae; see Fig. 6e, f). Especially in the peripheral region of the electrocyte, the papillae are closely packed and are even partially fused. The caudally directed bending of the electrocyte at the periphery (Fig. 6e) allows for tight contact with the surrounding connective tissue. Due to the presence of the papillae, the electrocytes achieve an average thickness of 41.6 µm (n = 25, SD = 10.8) with a maximum of up to 78 µm, while in regions lacking such papillae the cells are on average 11.6 µm thick (n = 25, SD = 4.5). Some papillae at the anterior face come into proximity to each other and finally merge to form a “cavity” filled with extracellular matrix (Figs. 6f, 7c). This association of papillae always co-occurs with the caudad curvature of the electrocyte. The proposed emergence of these cavities is depicted in Fig. 7 by different observed stages within one section. These structures apparently occur at random within the electrocyte (Fig. 5c).
Campylomormyrus tshokwe
The electrocytes are oriented almost parallel and their thickness slightly increases toward the periphery (Fig. 5d). At the periphery the electrocytes bend slightly caudad and they are in close contact with the connective tissue septum, which outlines each electrocyte compartment (Fig. 6g). Apart from these regions at the periphery, where the electrocyte can reach a thickness of 25 µm, the thickness ranges from 6 to 14 µm (mean = 10.1 ± 2.1, n = 25). The distance between the connective tissue septum and the rostral face of the electrocyte comprises about 100 µm, and the distance to the caudal face amounts to about twice as much (Fig. 5d). The stalks originate at the posterior face of the electrocyte (Figs. 5d, 6g, h), remain on this side and finally merge to one major stalk. A distinctive feature of the electrocyte is the large pores or fenestrations in the cell body, which become particularly obvious in the sagittal view (Fig. 5d), but are also detectable in the cross section (Fig. 8d).
These interruptions in the electrocyte’s body are not correlated in adjacent electrocytes and seem to appear at random. Furthermore, the electrocyte exhibits numerous small holes that are penetrated by blood vessels of various sizes (Fig. 6h).
Comparison of electrocyte organization among species
In C. compressirostris, C. numenius and C. tshokwe, the stalks emerge from the posterior face of the electrocyte and remain on this side, while merging to one major stalk. This electrocyte geometry is referred to as stalk of the NPp type (Bass 1986).
C. tamandua deviates from this pattern [and can be described as the Pa type (Bass 1986): the stalks in this species also arise on the posterior face, but penetrate the cell body soon after their origin and fuse on the anterior side of the electrocyte to become one major stalk.
Among the four investigated Campylomormyrus species, there are important differences in the stalk system, i.e., in the degree of branching of stalks and the number of fusions of stalks before merging in a major stalk: in C. compressirostris and C. tamandua, the many small stalks merge soon after their origin into one major stalk of large diameter (Fig. 8a, b), while in C. numenius and C. tshokwe the stalk system is more branched, fusing into the major stalk just before reaching the electromotor nerve (Fig. 8c, d).
Campylomormyrus numenius features the following characteristic specializations: (1) the arrangement of stalks at their site of origin is very regular and most of the numerous stalks project in an almost 90° angle into the extracellular space (Fig. 5c). (2) In comparison with individuals of C. tshokwe of similar size, the electrocytes of C. numenius are remarkably thick due to the existence of pronounced papillae at the anterior face (compare Fig. 6e, g). (3) The electrocyte’s cell body is partially curved. Therefore, the papillae at the anterior face come in close proximity to one another and fuse at a later stage. Thereby, cavities filled with extracellular matrix are formed (Fig. 7).
A unique feature of C. tshokwe is the occurrence of large pores in the electrocyte’s main body, which can encompass almost a quarter of the diameter of the electrocyte (see Fig. 5d). In C. tshokwe the electrocytes are often penetrated by blood vessels.
Comparison of innervation patterns of the electrocytes in the four species of Campylomormyrus
As shown by cross sections, the nerve fiber bundles of the electromotor neurons in C. compressirostris, C. tamandua and C. tshokwe extend deep into the column of electrocytes, whereas in C. numenius they remain close to their region of origin at the vertebral column (compare Fig. 8a–d).
In sagittal sections close to the midline, branches of the main nerve bundle, which run into the space between the electrocytes, can be seen in all four species (Fig. 9). Due to the above-described difference in the position of the main nerve, its branches are visible in medial aspects of the electrocyte columns of C. compressirostris, C. tamandua and C. tshokwe, but proceed closer to the vertebral column in C. numenius.
The nerve fiber bundles further branch within the space between electrocytes to envelope the stalks, which arrive from different peripheral directions. In the EO of C. compressirostris, C. tamandua and C. tshokwe the nerve bundle explicitly bifurcates in a dorsal and ventral branch (Figs. 8b, d, 9a). In accordance with this observation, a dorsal and ventral fraction of the stalk system fuses to become the major stalk. In C. compressirostris and C. tamandua, the stalks fuse to a major stalk before they reach the nerve (Figs. 9a, b, 10a, b), while in C. tshokwe numerous smaller stalks merge with the major stalk at the margin of the nerve (Figs. 8d, 10d).
In contrast, in C. numenius the nerve bundle can branch in more than two directions. This is in agreement with the highly ramified stalk system and the observation that more than two fractions of the stalk system travel toward the nerve. Sagittal sections of C. numenius’ electrocytes reveal that already stalks of small diameter contact the nerve (Fig. 9c). Furthermore, a major stalk of larger diameter can only be found within the mass of axons comprising the nerve (Fig. 10c).
Ontogeny of electric organ anatomy and electric organ discharge in C. numenius
We examined the EO of a juvenile, 11.1 cm-long specimen and an adult 31 cm-long specimen of C. numenius (Fig. 11a, d). These specimens show differences in overall morphology due to the positive allometric growth of the trunk-like snout. For the adult specimen, we were able to follow the dramatic change of the EOD waveform and duration during ontogeny for 3 years (Fig. 11b–d). As a juvenile, this individual featured an EOD with a duration of 3.4 ms, whereas as adult it produced an EOD of 28 ms duration (Fig. 11b, d). Throughout development, the EOD was biphasic, but the relationship of the duration for the head-positive and head-negative phase changed with age. In the juvenile, both phases of the biphasic EOD are of nearly equal duration (Fig. 11a), whereas the adult produces an EOD with the second head-negative phase being about three times longer in duration than the first head-positive phase (Fig. 11d). At intermediate age, the EOD is 12 ms in duration and the head-negative phase of the EOD is about two times longer in duration than the head-positive phase (Fig. 11c).
The basic electrocyte geometry (i.e., non-penetrating stalk system with posterior innervation, NPP type) is of the same type, both in the juvenile and the adult fish, as is the compartmentalization of the EO (arrangement of the connective tissue septa surrounding the electrocyte) (Fig. 12). Furthermore, orientation and relative dimension of the innervating nerve fiber bundles are similar in the juvenile and adult EO. The nerve bundles stay close to the vertebral column and do not form a long branch extending deep into the space between electrocyte’s faces.
Apart from these similarities, there are fundamental differences in the anatomy of the electrocytes between the two ontogenetic stages. Most striking are the prominent papillae of the anterior face of the adult fish’s electrocyte, which are completely lacking in the juvenile specimen (Fig. 12a). Due to the lack of anterior papillae, the electrocytes in the juvenile are overall much thinner than in the adult, i.e., 6–12 µm (mean = 8.18, n = 25, SD = 1.49). Furthermore, the stalks arising on the posterior face are less numerous in the juvenile and the stalk system is less branched. After their origin on the posterior face, the stalks fuse more rapidly into stalks of higher degree and thus longer segments of major stalks are observed in the juvenile as compared to the adult (Fig. 13a, c).
After having received innervation, the major stalk remains longer of large diameter in the juvenile compared to the adult when extending into the periphery of the electrocyte (Fig. 13b, d).
Discussion
Correlation of electrocyte geometry/anatomy and electric organ discharge features among the four species of Campylomormyrus
The site of innervation is known to crucially determine the EOD waveform in mormyrids (Bennett and Grundfest 1961; Bennett 1971; Bass 1986): biphasic EODs usually correlate with stalks of the NPp type, whereas triphasic EODs often occur in EOs with stalks of the Pa type. Our findings support previous data and modeling, since the only species with a triphasic EOD, C. tamandua, exhibits penetrating stalk electrocytes with anterior innervation. In contrast, the other three species analyzed here (C. compressirostris, C. numenius and C. tshokwe) possess non-penetrating stalk electrocytes with posterior innervation and discharge with biphasic waveforms. Our findings with regard to electrocyte geometry are also in accordance with observations from previous studies [C. numenius (Sullivan et al. 2000); C. tamandua (Bennett 1971; Sullivan et al. 2000); C. compressirostris (Bennett and Grundfest 1961)]. Our study is, however, the first one which directly compares electrocyte anatomy across species of the genus Campylomormyrus. It therefore provides first insights into some of the mechanisms enabling the enormous EOD variability among closely related species.
Among the three investigated species with biphasic waveforms and basically identical electrocyte geometry, there are striking differences in EOD duration and appearance of the EOD waveform (see Fig. 1) that are accompanied by distinctive anatomical differences of the EO.
The biphasic EOD of very short duration in C. compressirostris correlates with the presence of smooth anterior and posterior electrocyte faces and the fact that these electrocytes possess a single major stalk of large diameter, which receives its innervation in one restricted area. This agrees with previous descriptions for several mormyrid species (Bass 1986), where a single focally innervated stalk seems to cause fast propagation of the action potential (AP) and fast depolarization of the posterior face contributing to the brief EOD. A fast activation of the anterior face can be expected from its smooth membrane surface lending a low capacitance to it, since the membrane capacitance is known as one important factor affecting the electrical excitability and the velocity of AP conduction (Carlson 2002).
The electrocytes of C. numenius differ from those of C. compressirostris with regard to the structure of the anterior face and the appearance of the stalk system. The long EOD duration probably depends on two morphological aspects: (1) the anterior face of electrocytes exhibits a pronounced surface proliferation due to papillae. This feature is expected to significantly increase the membrane capacitance of the electrocytes, thereby prolonging the membrane’s time constant, i.e., the velocity at which the AP is propagated along the electrocyte’s membrane will be decreased. Bass et al. (1986) have already reported on a direct correlation between increasing membrane surface area and increasing EOD duration. (2) In C. numenius there is a highly branched network of stalks, i.e., the stalks are of small diameter even close to their region of innervation (i.e., no major stalk of large diameter is yet formed). Accordingly, the surface area of the electrocyte becomes enlarged by the presence of numerous stalks of small diameter compared, e.g., to a species with a large and sparsely ramified stalk like C. compressirostris or C. tamandua. Therefore, the capacitance of the stalk membrane is larger. This feature—together with the small diameter of the stalks—may cause a decrease in the propagation velocity of the APs within these branches. This might explain the long activation time of the posterior face and the accordingly long duration of the head-positive pulse.
C. tshokwe features an EOD of intermediate duration compared to C. compressirostris and C. numenius. Its electrocytes are similar to those of C. compressirostris with smooth anterior and posterior faces and a non-penetrating large stalk. However, compared to C. compressirostris, more stalks arise at the posterior face, the stalk system is more intensively branched and the major stalk bifurcates multiple times after having received innervation. Therefore, an elongated head-positive pulse could be expected due to an increased requirement of time for AP propagation along the stalks to the posterior face. Yet, in comparison to the EOD of C. numenius, the head-positive phase is shorter in C. tshokwe and its rising phase is very steep. There is no morphological correlate associated with this steep slope, but it is imaginable that a heterogeneous ion channel repertoire (e.g., channels with fast kinetics in the posterior face’s membrane) might be responsible for this EOD characteristic (Bennett 1970; Caputi et al. 2005). To test this hypothesis is beyond the scope of these histological examinations, as this would call for comparative studies on ion channel abundance and distribution across the distinct faces and the stalk among the different investigated species.
Whether the large fenestrations (pores) in the electrocyte’s cell body of C. tshokwe have an influence on EOD waveform/duration or, more specific, the small amplitude of the head-negative pulse, remains to be examined. It is reasonable to assume that these fenestrations allow for the flux of, e.g., sodium ions from the extracellular space of one face to the other face. The summed flow of this positive charge along the body axis by leak current could diminish the net flow of positive charge, which is initially caused by activation of the anterior or posterior face, respectively.
Since the relative amplitude of the EOD’s two main phases changes with total body length in C. tshokwe, we checked for a relationship between the degree and size of these fenestrations and total body length of the fish, but this analysis did not reveal any correlation.
C. tamandua exhibits an electrocyte geometry of the Pa type. The triphasic nature of its EOD is in full agreement with the prediction for this electrocyte anatomy (Bennett and Grundfest 1961; Bennett 1971). As a result of tunneled current flow along the stalks, which penetrate the electrocytes, a net flow of current runs from anterior to posterior and produces the small head-negative pre-phase of the EOD. Subsequent activation of the posterior face causes current flow in the posterior–anterior direction and hence a head-positive phase is measurable externally. Caused by the depolarization of the posterior face, also the anterior face becomes active and fires an AP. As result, the current flow is reversed and a final head-negative phase will be generated. Further, smooth anterior and posterior faces and a large, sparsely ramified stalk contribute to the overall brief EOD in this species.
Membranes of single electrocytes appear wavy in C. tamandua, the only species in this study with penetrating stalks. We cannot exclude that this is an artifact due to tissue shrinking during fixation. However, this wavy appearance was detected in all three C. tamandua specimens examined and absent in any specimen of the other three species with non-penetrating stalk. Interestingly, the same wavy appearance is also visible in other mormyrids with penetrating stalks such as Paramormyrops kingsleyae or Brienomyrus brachyistius (Gallant et al. 2011, 2012).
Ontogenetic change of electrocyte’s anatomy and electric organ discharge in C. numenius
As discussed above, the EOD waveform and duration in the adult C. numenius can be partially explained by the anatomy of the EO, in particular by the characteristics of the anterior membrane of the electrocyte and the branching pattern of the stalk system. The much shorter EOD of the juvenile is based on a clearly different anatomy: (1) papillae on the anterior face of the electrocyte are completely missing in the juvenile’s EO; (2) the stalk system is less branched than in the adult. A less branched stalk system should propagate the excitation faster and with less temporal delay to the posterior face leading to a more prompt activation of the caudal face by the stalk potential and thus a shorter head-positive phase. Further, the lack of papillae causes a much lower membrane capacitance of the anterior face in juvenile C. numenius compared to adults, which will boost the membrane’s electrical excitability. This feature hence accounts for immediate response to depolarization and the subsequent short AP fired by this face.
The shift in EOD duration in the larger, but still juvenile, specimen of C. numenius (Fig. 9c) suggests a beginning increase of surface proliferation by the emergence of papillae on the anterior face. Such changes in membrane properties are known to be induced by gonadal steroid hormones (Bass et al. 1986). Therefore, the ontogenetic development of the EOD might be accompanied by changing plasma levels of steroid hormones. Whether the same hormone triggers these anatomical changes in both males and females of C. numenius or if other developmental processes are responsible has to be revealed by future investigations.
The understanding of the ontogenetic processes concerning the EO and the EOD is partially compromised by some authors having erroneously considered juveniles as a separate species—based on their deviant EOD (e.g., C. sp. B studied by Hopkins 1999; Trzcinski and Hopkins 2008—according to our study of the EOD ontogeny—a juvenile stage of C. numenius). Further, we do not know how the EOD of even younger and thus smaller juveniles of C. numenius (<11 cm) look like, i.e., whether the observed positive correlation between total body length and EOD duration persists or if there is a size range in which the EOD duration is constant. Therefore, we cannot estimate how many mechanisms (beyond proliferation of the anterior face and increasing furcation of the stalk system) are being involved in EOD development in this mormyrid species.
For future investigations, it would be interesting to study the ontogenetic EOD change in additional species, as there is at least one more species, respectively, species complex within the genus Campylomormyrus (i.e., C. alces) for which ontogenetic change in EOD duration has been observed (Trzcinski and Hopkins 2008; unpublished results).
Conclusion and outlook
Three of the examined species exhibit rather different EOD waveforms, despite similar electrocyte geometry. Here, the distribution and repertoire of ion channels could play a role in generating these inter-species differences (Caputi et al. 2005). A study on a representative of Gymnotiformes revealed that voltage-dependent ion channel kinetics correlate with AP duration and membrane excitability (McAnelly and Zakon 2000). Furthermore, in a gymnotiform fish, sex-specific EOD differences were related to expression levels of genes encoding voltage-gated potassium channel subunits (Few and Zakon 2007). Therefore, studies on the expression levels of genes encoding for voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels within the EO as well as on the distribution of these ion channels across the electrocyte would be highly welcome. One member of voltage-gated sodium channels is a particularly promising candidate for subsequent studies on ion channel distribution and abundance, since the expression of this member is known to be restricted to the EO in several electric fish species (Zakon et al. 2006).
So far, we have not discovered any sexual dimorphism within the EODs of the examined Campylomormyrus species. However, each individual was only recorded once during sampling in the dry season. Therefore, it is possible that seasonal changes occurred, which we did not capture. Particularly large males might possess deviant EODs, but those were underrepresented in our data set, as those are rare. To further examine sexual dimorphism in EOD, further sampling of large individuals during the spawning season (wet season) would be required.
The ontogenetic changes in the EO of C. numenius at the histological level were investigated with light microscopic techniques. Here, EM studies could unravel further details of membrane changes during ontogeny.
The elongated EOD is a derived character, shared by C. numenius and its sister species C. rhynchophorus (Feulner et al. 2008; unpublished results). It would be hence very interesting to study the EOD ontogeny and fine structure of the electrocytes in C. rhychophorus as well.
References
Alves-Gomes JA, Hopkins CD (1997) Molecular insights into the phylogeny of Mormyriform fishes and the evolution of their electric organs. Brain Behav Evol 49:324–350. doi:10.1159/000113223
Bass AH (1986) Species differences in electric organs of mormyrids: substrates for species-typical electric organ discharge waveforms. J Comp Neurol 244:313–330. doi:10.1002/cne.902440305
Bass AH, Hopkins C (1985) Hormonal control of sex differences in the electric organ discharge (EOD) of mormyrid fishes. J Comp Physiol A 156:587–604. doi:10.1007/BF00619109
Bass AH, Denizot JP, Marchaterre MA (1986) Ultrastructural features and hormone-dependent sex differences of mormyrid electric organs. J Comp Neurol 254:511–528. doi:10.1002/cne.902540405
Bell CC, Bradbury J, Russell CJ (1976) The electric organ of a mormyrid as a current and voltage source. J Comp Physiol 110:65–88. doi:10.1007/BF00656782
Bell CC, Libouban S, Szabo T (1983) Pathways of the electric organ discharge command and its corollary discharges in mormyrid fish. J Comp Neurol 216:327–338. doi:10.1002/cne.902160309
Bennett MVL (1970) Comparative physiology: electric organs. Ann Rev Physiol 32:471–528. doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.32.030170.002351
Bennett MVL (1971) Electric organs. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds) Fish physiology vol. V—sensory systems and electric organs. Academic Press, New York, London, pp 347–491. doi:10.1016/S1546-5098(08)60051-5
Bennett MVL, Grundfest H (1961) Studies on the morphology and electrophysiology of electric organs. III. Electrophysiology of electric organs in mormyrids. In: Chagas C, Paes de Carvalho A (eds) Bioelectrogenesis. Elsevier, London, New York, pp 113-135
Bruns V (1971) Elektrisches organ von Gnathonemus (Mormyridae) Elektrische Platte und Innervation. Zeitung für Zellforsch 122:538–563. doi:10.1007/BF00936087
Caputi AA, Carlson BA, Macadar O (2005) Electric organs and their control. In: Bullock TH, Hopkins CD, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Electroreception. Springer, New York, pp 420–424. doi:10.1007/0-387-28275-0_14
Carlson BA (2002) Electric signaling behavior and the mechanisms of electric organ discharge production in mormyrid fish. J Physiol Paris 96:405–419. doi:10.1016/S0928-4257(03)00019-6
Cheng C (2012) Morphological correlates of signal variation in weakly electric mormyrid fish. Honors Thesis, Cornell University
Denizot JP, Kirschbaum F, Westby GWM, Tsuji S (1982) On the development of the adult electric organ in the mormyrid fish Pollimyrus isidori (with special focus on the innervation). J Neurocyt 11:913–934. doi:10.1007/BF01148308
Feulner PGD, Kirschbaum F, Tiedemann R (2008) Adaptive radiation in the Congo River: an ecological speciation scenario for African weakly electric fish (Teleostei; Mormyridae; Campylomormyrus). J Physiol 102:340–346. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.10.002
Few W, Zakon H (2007) Sex differences in and hormonal regulation of Kv1 potassium channel gene expression in the electric organ: molecular control of a social signal. Dev Neurobiol 67:535–549. doi:10.1002/dneu.20305
Freedman EG, Olyarchuk J, Marchaterre MA, Bass AH (1989) A temporal analysis of testosterone-induced changes in electric organs and electric organ discharges of mormyrid fishes. J Neurobiol 20:619–634. doi:10.1002/neu.480200703
Friedman MA, Hopkins CD (1996) Tracking individual mormyrid electric fish in the field using electric organ discharge waveforms. Anim Behav 51:391–407. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0037
Gallant JR, Arnegard ME, Sullivan JP et al (2011) Signal variation and its morphological correlates in Paramormyrops kingsleyae provide insight into the evolution of electrogenic signal diversity in mormyrid electric fish. J Comp Physiol A 197:799–817. doi:10.1007/s00359-011-0643-8
Gallant JR, Hopkins CD, Deitcher DL (2012) Differential expression of genes and proteins between electric organ and skeletal muscle in the mormyrid electric fish Brienomyrus brachyistius. J Exp Biol 215:2479–2494. doi:10.1242/jeb.063222
Grant K, Bell CC, Clausse S, Ravaille M (1986) Morphology and physiology of the brainstem nuclei controlling the electric organ discharge in mormyrid fish. J Comp Neurol 245:514–530. doi:10.1002/cne.902450407
Grier JH (1981) Cellular organization of the testis and spermatogenesis in fishes. Am Zool 21:345–357. doi:10.1093/icb/21.2.345
Hopkins CD (1980) Evolution of electric communication channels of mormyrids. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:1–13. doi:10.1007/BF00302513
Hopkins CD (1981) On the diversity of electric signals in a community of mormyrid electric fish in West Africa. Am Zool 21:211–222. doi:10.1093/icb/21.1.211
Hopkins CD (1999) Design features for electric communication. J Exp Biol 202:1217–1228
Hopkins CD, Bass AH (1981) Temporal coding of species recognition signals in an electric fish. Science 212:85–87. doi:10.1126/science.7209524
Kirschbaum F (1977) Electric-organ ontogeny—distinct larval organ precedes adult organ in weakly electric fish. Naturwissenschaften 64:387–388. doi:10.1007/BF00368748
Kirschbaum F (1982) Die Entwicklung des “adulten” elektrischen Organes bei Pollimyrus isidori (Mormyridae, Teleostei). Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 75:242
Kramer B (1996) Electroreception and communication in fishes. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 44–73
Kramer B, Kuhn B (1994) Species recognition by the sequence of discharge intervals in weakly electric fishes of the genus Campylomormyrus (Mormyridae, Teleostei). Anim Behav 48:435–445. doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1257
Landsman RE (1993) Sex-differences in external morphology and electric organ discharges in imported Gnathonemus petersii (Mormyriformes). Anim Behav 46:417–429. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1211
Lissmann HW (1958) On the function and evolution of electric organs in fish. J Exp Biol 35:156–191
Marcusen J (1864) Die Familie der Mormyren. Eine anatomisch-zoologische Abhandlung. Eggers et Comp, St Petersburg, pp 89–104
McAnelly ML, Zakon HH (2000) Coregulation of voltage-dependent kinetics of Na+ and K+ currents in electric organ. J Neurosci 20:3408–3414
Moller P (1970) “Communication” in weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus niger (Mormyridae) I. Variation of electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency elicited by controlled electric stimuli. Anim Behav 18:768–786. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(70)90026-6
Mulisch M, Welsch U (2010) Romeis-Mikroskopische Technik, 18th edn. Spektrum, Heidelberg
Ogneff J (1898) Einige Bemerkungen über den Bau des schwachen elektrischen Organs bei den Mormyriden. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zool 64:565–595
Rohlf FJ (2013) TpsDig, Version 2.17, Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Stony Brook
Rüppel E (1832) Fortsetzung der Beschreibung und Abbildung mehrerer neuen Fische im Nil entdeckt. Frankfurt a.M
Schlichter H (1906) Über den feineren Bau des schwach elektrischen Organs von Mormyrus oxyrhinchus. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zool 84:479–525
Schugardt C, Kirschbaum F (2002) Nilhechte des “Formenkreises” Campylomormyrus numenius: Bemerkungen zur Ontogenese des Habitus, der elektrischen Entladung sowie zum Fortpflanzungsverhalten. In: Greven H, Riehl R (eds) Verhalten von Aquarienfischen II. Birgit Schmettkamp Verlag, Bornheim, pp 137–146
Schwartz IR, Pappas GD, Bennett MV (1975) The fine structure of electrocytes in weakly electric teleosts. J Neurocytol 4:87–114. doi:10.1007/BF01099098
Sullivan JP, Lavoué S, Hopkins CD (2000) Molecular systematics of the African electric fishes (Mormyroidea: Teleostei) and a model for the evolution of their electric organs. J Exp Biol 203:665–683
Szabo T (1956) Sur la structure et le type d’innervation de l’électroplaque d’un Mormyre. C R Acad Sci 242:2045–2048
Szabo T (1957) Le muscle d’origine de l’organe electrique d’un Mormyre. Zeitschrift für Zellforsch und Mikroskopische Anat 47:77–79. doi:10.1007/BF00340005
Szabo T (1958) Structure intime de l’organe electrique de trois Mormyrides. Zeitschrift für Zellforsch 40:33–45. doi:10.1007/BF00335061
Szabo T (1960) Development of the electric organ of Mormyridae. Nature 188:760–762. doi:10.1038/188760b0
Szabo T (1961) Rapports onto génétique s entre l’organe électrique, son innervation et sa commande encéphalique (Mormyrus rume). Zeitschrift für Zellforsch und Mikroskopische Anat 55:200–203. doi:10.1007/BF00340930
Taverne L (1972) Ostéologie des genres Mormyrus Linné, Mormyrops Müller, Hyperopisus Gill, Isichthys Gill, Myomyrus Boulenger, Stomatorhinus Boulenger et Gymnarchus Cuvier considérations générales sur la systématique des poissons de l`ordre des Mormyriformes. MRAC, Tervuren
Trzcinski N, Hopkins CD (2008) Electric signaling and electroreception properties in electric fishes of the genus, Campylomormyrus Mormyridae. Cornell Synap 2:19–22
Von der Emde G (1999) Active electrolocation of objects in weakly electric fish. J Exp Biol 202:1205–1215
Von Der Emde G (2006) Non-visual environmental imaging and object detection through active electrolocation in weakly electric fish. J Comp Physiol A 192:601–612. doi:10.1007/s00359-006-0096-7
Von der Emde G, Bleckmann H (1998) Finding food: senses involved in foraging for insect larvae in the electric fish Gnathonemus petersii. J Exp Biol 201:969–980
Von der Emde G, Ringer T (1992) Electrolocation of capacitive objects in four species of pulse-type weakly electric fish I. Discrim Perform Ethol 91:326–338. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00873.x
Von der Emde G, Schwarz S (2002) Imaging of objects through active electrolocation in Gnathonemus petersii. J Physiol Paris 96:431–444. doi:10.1016/S0928-4257(03)00021-4
Wallace RA, Selman K (1981) Cellular and dynamic aspects of oocyte growth in teleosts. Am Zool 21:325–334. doi:10.1093/icb/21.2.325
Westby GWM, Kirschbaum F (1982) Sex differences in the waveform of the pulse-type electric fish, Pollimyrus isidori (Mormyridae). J Comp Physiol 145:399–403. doi:10.1007/BF00619344
Zakon HH, Lu Y, Zwickl DJ, Hillis DM (2006) Sodium channel genes and the evolution of diversity in communication signals of electric fishes: convergent molecular evolution. PNAS 103:3675–3680. doi:10.1073/pnas.0600160103
Acknowledgments
We thank S. Abelt, H. Höft and D. Bernau for technical assistance. Financial support is acknowledged from the University of Potsdam and the Leibniz-SAW project GENART. Further, financial support is acknowledged from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TI 349/1-1 and TI 349/1-2).
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
359_2015_995_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx
Online Resource 1: five EOD characteristics for 82 specimens of four Campylomormyrus species (C. compressirostris, C. numenius, C. tamandua and C. tshokwe) measured via a custom-made MATLAB script (XLSX 16 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paul, C., Mamonekene, V., Vater, M. et al. Comparative histology of the adult electric organ among four species of the genus Campylomormyrus (Teleostei: Mormyridae). J Comp Physiol A 201, 357–374 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-015-0995-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-015-0995-6