Abstract
In agglomerative hierarchical clustering, pair-group methods suffer from a problem of non-uniqueness when two or more distances between different clusters coincide during the amalgamation process. The traditional approach for solving this drawback has been to take any arbitrary criterion in order to break ties between distances, which results in different hierarchical classifications depending on the criterion followed. In this article we propose a variable-group algorithm that consists in grouping more than two clusters at the same time when ties occur. We give a tree representation for the results of the algorithm, which we call a multidendrogram, as well as a generalization of the Lance andWilliams’ formula which enables the implementation of the algorithm in a recursive way.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ARNAU, V., MARS, S., and MARÍN, I. (2005), “Iterative Cluster Analysis of Protein Interaction Data,” Bioinformatics, 21(3), 364–378.
BACKELJAU, T., DE BRUYN, L., DE WOLF, H., JORDAENS, K., VAN DONGEN, S., and WINNEPENNINCKX, B. (1996), “Multiple UPGMA and Neighbor-Joining Trees and the Performance of Some Computer Packages,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13(2), 309–313.
CORMACK, R.M. (1971), “A Review of Classification” (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A, 134, 321–367.
GORDON, A.D. (1999), Classification (2nd ed.), London/Boca Raton, FL:Chapman & Hall/CRC.
HART, G. (1983), “The Occurrence of Multiple UPGMA Phenograms,” in Numerical Taxonomy, ed. J. Felsenstein, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 254–258.
LANCE, G.N., and WILLIAMS, W.T. (1966), “A Generalized Sorting Strategy for Computer Classifications,” Nature, 212, 218.
MACCUISH, J., NICOLAOU, C., and MACCUISH, N.E. (2001), “Ties in Proximity and Clustering Compounds,” Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 41, 134–146.
MORGAN, B.J.T., and RAY, A.P.G. (1995), “Non-uniqueness and Inversions in Cluster Analysis,” Applied Statistics, 44(1), 117–134.
SNEATH, P.H.A., and SOKAL, R.R. (1973), Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
SZÉKELY, G.J., and RIZZO, M.L. (2005), “Hierarchical Clustering via Joint Between-Within Distances: Extending Ward’s Minimum Variance Method,” Journal of Classification, 22, 151–183.
VAN DER KLOOT, W.A., SPAANS, A.M.J., and HEISER, W.J. (2005), “Instability of Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Due to Input Order of the Data: The Permu CLUSTER Solution,” Psychological Methods, 10(4), 468–476.
WARD, J.H., Jr. (1963), “Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors thank A. Arenas for discussion and helpful comments. This work was partially supported by DGES of the Spanish Government Project No. FIS2006–13321–C02–02 and by a grant of Universitat Rovira i Virgili.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernández, A., Gómez, S. Solving Non-Uniqueness in Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Using Multidendrograms. J Classif 25, 43–65 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-008-9004-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-008-9004-x