Abstract
Ramon Llull (Majorca c.1232–1316) is one of the earliest founding fathers of voting theory and social choice theory. The present article places Llull’s contributions and discussion in the historical context of elections in the medieval Church and the emergence of majority rule as a new general principle for making enforceable collective decisions in replacement of traditional unanimous requirements. To make the majority principle operational, Llull initially proposed a system of exhaustive binary comparisons that is more efficacious in producing a winner than the Condorcet system, in anticipation to the so called Copeland procedure. In contrast to some previous tentative suggestions, careful reading of Llull’s papers demonstrates that he did not propose a rank-order count system, such as those proposed later on by Cusanus and Borda. A new hypothesis is presented to explain Llull’s later proposal of an eliminatory system of partial binary comparisons. Some performance of Llull’s voting systems is estimated by innovative analysis of results in certain modern sports tournaments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Black D (1958) The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bonner A (2007) The art and logic of Ramon Llull. Brill, Leiden
Coggins JS, Perali CF (1998) 64% majority rule in Ducal Venice: voting for the doge. Public Choice 97: 709–723
Colomer JM (2001) Political institutions. Democracy and social choice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Colomer, JM (eds) (2004) Handbook of electoral system choice. Palgrave-Macmillan, Houndmills
Colomer JM (2010) The science of politics. Oxford University Press, New York
Colomer JM (2011a) City-republic. In: Kurian GT (eds) The encyclopedia of political science. vol 2. CQ Press, Washington, DC. http://library.congress.coms/teps/encyps_230.1
Colomer JM (2011b) Election by lots. In: Badie B, Berg-Schlosser D, Morlino L (eds) International encyclopedia of political science, vol 3. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 719–722
Colomer JM (2011c) Social choice theory. In: Badie B, Berg-Schlosser D, Morlino L (eds) International encyclopedia of political science, vol 8. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 2415–2420
Colomer JM, McLean I (1998) Electing Popes: approval balloting and qualified-majority rule. J Interdiscip Hist XXIX(1): 1–22
Colomer JM, McLean I, Lorrey H (2007) Voting in the medieval papacy and religious orders. In: Tora V, Narukans Y, Yoshida Y (eds) Modelling decisions for artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin and New York, pp 30–44
Colomer JM, McLean I, Lorrey H (2007) Social choice in Medieval Europe. Electron J Hist Probab Stat 4(1): 1–23
Condorcet, Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat Marquis de (1785) Essai sur l’application de l’analyse aI la probabilité des décisions rendues aI la pluralité des vois. Imprimerie royale, Paris (Partial English translation in McLean and Urken 1995)
Copeland AH (1951) A ‘reasonable’ social welfare function. Seminar on applications of mathematics to the social sciences. University of Michigan, Ann arbor
Coroleu I, Pella J [1876] (1993) Las Cortes catalanas: estudio jurídico y comparativo. Librería París, Valencia
Drton M, Hagele G, Haneberg D, Pukelsheim F, Reif W (2004) A rediscovered Llull tract and the Augsburg web edition of Llull’s electoral writings. Le Médiéviste et l’ordinateur, 43. http://lemo.irht.cnrs.fr/43/43-06.htm
Felsenthal DS, Machover M (1992) After two centuries, should Condorcet’s voting procedure be implemented?. Behav Sci 37(4): 250–280
Ferro V (1987) El dret públic català. Les institucions a Catalunya fins al Decret de Nova Planta. Eumo, Vic
Fidora, A, Sierra, C (eds) (2011) Ramon Llull: from Ars Magna to artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, CSIC, Barcelona
Gardner M (1982) Logic machines and diagrams, 2nd edn. Harvester, Brighton
Gregory P IX [1234] (1959) Decretalium compilatio. In: Corpus Iuris Canonici (Aemilius Friedberg ed.). Akademia Druck-U. Verlangsanstalt, Graz
Gregory P X [1276] (1991) ‘VI Decretalium’. In: Giuseppe Alberigo (eds) Concilium Oecumenicorum Decreta. Dehoniane, Bologna
Hägele G, Pukelsheim F (2001) ‘Llull’s writings on electoral systems’. Stud Lul 41:3–38. http://www.uni-augsburg.de/pukelsheim/2001a.html
Heinberg JG (1926) History of the majority principle. Am Politi Sci Rev 20(1): 52–68
Honecker M (1937) Lullus-Handschriften aus dem Besitz des Kardinals Nikolaus von Cues. Nebst einer Beschreiburng der Lullus-texte in Trier und einem Anhang uber den wiederaufgefundenen Traktat De arte elkectionis’. Span Forsch Gorresgesellsch, Erste Reihe 5: 239–259
Lines M (1986) Approval voting and strategy analysis: a venetian example. Theory Decis 20: 155–186
Lively, J, Rees, J (eds) (1978) Utilitarian logic and politics. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Lord RH (1930) The parliaments of the middle ages and the early modern period. Cathol Hist Rev 16(2): 125–144
McLean I (1990) The Borda and Condorcet principles: three medieval applications. Soc Choice Welf 7: 99–108
McLean I, London J (1992) Ramon Llull and the theory of voting. Stud Lul 32: 21–37
McLean, I, Urken, AB (eds) (1995) Classics of social choice. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Moulin L (1953) Les origines religieuses des techniques électorales et délibératives modernes. Rev Int Hist Polit Const III: 106–148
Mowbray M, Gollmann1 D(2007) Electing the doge of Venice: analysis of a 13th century protocol. HP Laboratories, Bristol. http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2007/HPL-2007-28R1.pdf
Pérez Martínez L (1959) El Ars notandi y el Ars electionis, dos obras desconocidas de Ramon Llull. Estud Lul 3: 275–278
Rasch BE (1995) Parliamentary voting procedures. In: Herbert D (eds) Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe. St. Martin‘s Press, New York, pp 488–527
Regenwetter M, Grofman B, Marley AAJ, Tsetlin I (2006) Behavioral social choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ruffini AE (1925) Il principio maggioritario nella storia del Diritto Canonico. Arch Giurid Filippo Serafini 4(IX): 15–67
Ruffini Avondo Edoardo [1927] (1976) Il principio maggioritario. Profilo storico. Adelphi, Milan
Saari DG, Merlin VR (1996) The Copeland method. I: relationships and the dictionary. Econ Theory 8: 51–76
Saari DG, Merlin VR (1997) Copeland method II: manipulation, monotonicity, and paradoxes. J Econ Theory 72: 148–172
Uckelman SL, Uckelman J (2010) Strategy and manipulation in medieval elections. Accessed in http://ccc.cs.uni-duesseldorf.de/COMSOC2010/papers/logiccc-uckelman.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colomer, J.M. Ramon Llull: from ‘Ars electionis’ to social choice theory. Soc Choice Welf 40, 317–328 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0598-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0598-2