Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive disorder in which the loss of dystrophin causes progressive degeneration of skeletal and cardiac muscle. Potential therapies that carry substantial risk, such as gene- and cell-based approaches, must first be tested in animal models, notably the mdx mouse and several dystrophin-deficient breeds of dogs, including golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD). Affected dogs have a more severe phenotype, in keeping with that of DMD, so may better predict disease pathogenesis and treatment efficacy. Various phenotypic tests have been developed to characterize disease progression in the GRMD model. These biomarkers range from measures of strength and joint contractures to magnetic resonance imaging. Some of these tests are routinely used in clinical veterinary practice, while others require specialized equipment and expertise. By comparing serial measurements from treated and untreated groups, one can document improvement or delayed progression of disease. Potential treatments for DMD may be broadly categorized as molecular, cellular, or pharmacologic. The GRMD model has increasingly been used to assess efficacy of a range of these therapies. A number of these studies have provided largely general proof-of-concept for the treatment under study. Others have demonstrated efficacy using the biomarkers discussed. Importantly, just as symptoms in DMD vary among patients, GRMD dogs display remarkable phenotypic variation. Though confounding statistical analysis in preclinical trials, this variation offers insight regarding the role that modifier genes play in disease pathogenesis. By correlating functional and mRNA profiling results, gene targets for therapy development can be identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive disorder affecting approximately 1 of 3,500–7,500 newborn live human males (Cowan et al. 1980) in whom absence of the protein dystrophin causes progressive degeneration of skeletal and cardiac muscle (Hoffman et al. 1987). Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), a less severe clinical form, occurs at approximately one tenth the frequency of DMD (Prior and Bridgeman 2005). BMD mutations have a similar incidence and distribution to those causing DMD but maintain the dystrophin reading frame, allowing for production of a truncated, partially functional protein. DMD boys are typically confined to wheel chairs before 14 years of age, while those with BMD walk beyond 16 years (Malhotra et al. 1988). Approximately two-thirds of DMD gene mutations have historically been attributed to large (>1 exon) deletions (Wulff et al. 1989; Dent et al. 2005; Prior and Bridgeman 2005). These deletions tend to predominate in one of two hotspots, namely, the central rod domain around exons 44–53 (~80%) and, to a lesser extent (~20%), the 5′ terminus (Beggs et al. 1990; Prior and Bridgeman 2005). A recent study in which point mutations identified by sequence analysis were likely overrepresented found an incidence of only 43% deletions, 11% duplications, and 46% point mutations (Flanigan et al. 2009). Although DMD classically demonstrates a strong family history, about one-third of cases occur due to new mutations (Caskey et al. 1980).
Potential therapies that carry substantial risk, such as gene- and cell-based approaches, must ideally first be tested in relevant animal models, most notably the mdx mouse (Bulfield et al. 1984; Gillis 1999) and several dystrophin-deficient breeds of dogs (Cooper et al. 1988; Kornegay et al. 1988; Schatzberg et al. 1999; Jones et al. 2004; Baltzer et al. 2007; Walmsley et al. 2010; Smith et al. 2011). Because clinical features in dogs are more severe than those in mdx mice, in keeping with the DMD phenotype, preclinical studies in the canine models might be more predictive of disease pathogenesis and treatment outcome. Numerous dog breeds with dystrophin-deficient muscular dystrophy have been characterized clinically, but few have been studied at the molecular level. We have conducted extensive studies in a dystrophin-deficient form of muscular dystrophy originally characterized in golden retrievers (GRMD). An mRNA processing error in GRMD dogs results from a single base change in the 3′ consensus splice site of intron 6. Exon 7 is consequently skipped during mRNA processing (Sharp et al. 1991). The resulting transcript predicts that the dystrophin reading frame is terminated within its N-terminal domain in exon 8.
DMD gene mutations have also been described in Rottweilers (nonsense mutation in exon 58) (Winand et al. 1994; N. Winand, personal communication), German shorthaired pointers (large deletion, essentially amounting to a “dystrophin knockout”) (Schatzberg et al. 1999), Pembroke Welsh corgis (repetitive element-1 [LINE-1] insertion in intron 13) (Smith et al. 2011), and Cavalier King Charles spaniels (missense mutation in the 5′ donor splice site of exon 50 resulting in deletion of exon 50 in mRNA transcripts) (Walmsley et al. 2010) (Table 1). Separately, we have identified three additional DMD gene mutations in the Cocker spaniel (deletion of four nucleotides in exon 65, with a reading frame shift predicting a premature stop codon at the site of the deletion), Tibetan terrier (a large deletion of exons 8–29), and Labrador retriever (184-nucleotide [pseudoexon] insertion between exon 19 and exon 20, which results in a premature stop codon at the next codon downstream of the insertion) (C. A. Larsen et al., unpublished). The Labrador retriever mutation presumably corresponds to one in an earlier report (Smith et al. 2007).
Biomarkers for assessment of the natural history and response to treatment
Clinical course of DMD
The study of muscle diseases has evolved from a classical age in which a diagnosis was based on clinical and pathologic features, to a modern period when muscle biopsies were further characterized through histo- and cytochemical techniques, to the current era of molecular diagnosis (Engel and Ozawa 2004; Meola 2005). With the advent of techniques such as multiplex polymerase chain reaction and Southern blotting, DMD can be diagnosed noninvasively without the need for muscle biopsy (Prior and Bridgeman 2005). As a result, baseline and follow-up pathologic data are not typically available to assess disease progression or response to therapy. Other surrogate biomarkers must be utilized to ensure that results of treatment trials are interpreted appropriately. Most DMD natural history studies have included measurements of muscle strength, joint contractures, and timed function tests. Results from these tests are used to track disease progression and offer insight on clinical milestones such as the loss of ambulation and the need for ventilatory support. Both muscle weakness and joint contractures contribute to postural instability and ultimate loss of ambulation (Vignos et al. 1963). Contracture and muscle strength scores generally correlate and deteriorate synchronously over time (Brooke et al. 1983).
Clinical course of GRMD
Several studies have defined the characteristic clinical signs of GRMD (Kornegay et al. 1988; Valentine et al. 1988; Shimatsu et al. 2005; Ambrósio et al. 2009) (Fig. 1). Signs occur soon after birth because affected pups are often ineffectual sucklers and must be supplemented. As a result, they typically exhibit stunted growth. By 6 weeks of age, the pelvic limbs may be advanced simultaneously and trismus is noted. Dogs subsequently develop a progressively more stilted gait, atrophy of particularly the truncal and temporalis muscles, a plantigrade stance due to hyperextension of the carpal joints and flexion at the tibiotarsal joints, excessive drooling suggesting pharyngeal muscle involvement, and initial lumbar kyphosis that progresses to lordosis. As with DMD, some muscles paradoxically undergo hypertrophy. Aspiration pneumonia may occur due to pharyngeal or esophageal muscle involvement. Cardiac failure due to cardiomyopathy can also occur.
Importantly, there can be marked variation in disease severity in GRMD, with some dogs dying soon after birth due to extreme respiratory compromise and others demonstrating a remarkably mild phenotype (Ambrósio et al. 2008). In their early study of the clinical signs of GRMD, Valentine et al. (1988) suggested that homozygous females and smaller affected dogs might have milder signs. Smaller beagle crosses with the GRMD mutation also may have a less severe phenotype (Shimatsu et al. 2003; Yugeta et al. 2006). Supporting a potential influence of either gender or body weight, female mdx mice have a milder phenotype (Salimena et al. 2004) and one DMD boy with growth hormone deficiency had less severe signs (Zatz et al. 1981). Effects due to gender or body weight could influence interpretation of GRMD preclinical studies in which both males and females of variable size are used.
With regard to body size, DMD treatment trials directed at reducing growth hormone have failed to support a relationship with disease severity (Griggs et al. 1990). Moreover, in a separate GRMD study, lower growth hormone levels actually tended to correlate with a more severe phenotype (de Lima et al. 2007). In reviewing our own phenotypic data, we found that larger GRMD dogs, if anything, have milder signs at 6 months of age. Tibiotarsal joint angle and body weight correlated directly, indicating that larger dogs had less severe postural instability. Larger GRMD dogs also had significantly smaller cranial sartorius muscles and trended toward lower flexion force values, both of which predict a less severe phenotype. This negative correlation between body size and phenotype likely reflects stunting rather than cause and effect. We believe the milder clinical signs initially reported in beagle crosses probably reflect the ameliorating effects of outbreeding, as Labrador retrievers with the GRMD mutation also had a less severe phenotype (Miyazato et al. 2011). Similarly, in assessing the effects of gender in our own colony, results from phenotypic tests did not differ between homozygous female and heterozygous male GRMD dogs (Kornegay et al. 2011). Thus, we have been unable to document an effect of either gender or body size in GRMD.
Biomarkers in DMD and GRMD
To better utilize the GRMD model in therapeutic trials, we and others have developed various phenotypic tests to objectively characterize disease progression. Workshops have been held to standardize these tests with those used in the mdx mouse (Nagaraju et al. 2009). Results from functional tests tend to correlate with one another and with other clinicopathologic features (Fig. 2). By comparing serial measurements from treated and untreated groups, one can document improvement or delayed progression of disease. In keeping with the phenotypic variation seen clinically, functional outcome values have also varied considerably, even among dogs within the same litter, suggesting that modifier genes significantly influence the phenotype (Kornegay et al. 1994a, b, 1999). Importantly, phenotypic variation confounds data analysis, requiring larger group sizes to demonstrate significance. The effects of phenotypic variation on statistical analysis can be offset by establishing baseline outcome values prior to treatment so that each dog serves as its own control. With localized treatments, the effect of phenotypic variation is less of a concern because the untreated opposite limb can serve as the control.
Composite and group severity scores
Composite scores that take into account somewhat subjective numerical values assigned to particular clinical signs (Sampaolesi et al. 2006; Thibaud et al. 2007; Rouger et al. 2011) or overall disease phenotype (Ambrósio et al. 2009) have been described and utilized in preclinical GRMD trials. With the composite score method, a variety of postural and gait changes were assessed and scored 0, 1, or 2 (normal, mild, or severe). The scores were added to indicate the degree of dysfunction (Sampaolesi et al. 2006; Thibaud et al. 2007). A later study used this same method but also assigned scores for functional categories (ptyalism, breathing) not directly related to gait and posture (Rouger et al. 2011). Another group subdivided dogs into three functional groups (mild, moderate, and severe) based principally on postural changes (Ambrósio et al. 2009). While these end points could have value in broadly categorizing general therapeutic trends, additional more objective tests should be utilized to document efficacy.
Gait
Stéphane Blot’s research group at Maisons-Alfort has utilized accelerometry to objectively characterize the slow, short-stepped, and swaying gait of adult GRMD dogs (Barthélémy et al. 2009). Several quantitative indices, including total power, force, and regularity of accelerations, stride length and speed (normalized for the dog’s height at the withers), stride frequency, and craniocaudal power were significantly decreased, while mediolateral power was increased in GRMD versus normal dogs. Results tended to parallel those achieved with composite clinical scores discussed above. A subsequent longitudinal study showed that gait changes could be identified in GRMD dogs as early as 2 months of age and then they evolved with age (Barthélémy et al. 2011).
We have assessed two-dimensional gait kinematics of the stifle and tibiotarsal joints in adult GRMD dogs (Marsh et al. 2010). They walked significantly slower and had more extended stifle and less flexed tibiotarsal joints than normal dogs; range of motion was comparable in the stifle but reduced in the tarsus. These changes should be interpreted in light of the joint angle data collected at 6 months of age (discussed below). While the finding of greater extension of the stifle is consistent with these data, the tibiotarsal joints of GRMD dogs typically are more (rather than less) flexed. This discrepancy may relate to the differing ages and phenotype of the two groups, as the kinematic data came from older, mildly affected dogs.
The 6-min walk test has become a standard outcome parameter in DMD patients (McDonald et al. 2010) and has also been used to assess dogs with heart disease (Boddy et al. 2004). In their study of accelerometry, Barthélémy et al. (2009) indicated that GRMD dogs had difficulty completing the test. Our group has no experience with the 6-min walk test.
Joint angles
We previously reported that 6-month-old GRMD dogs have abnormally acute (contracted) tibiotarsal joint angles while positioned in dorsal recumbency for force measurements (Kornegay et al. 1994a, b). Other investigators have subsequently described methods to measure joint angles at maximal flexion and extension in normal dogs (Jaegger et al. 2002; Nicholson et al. 2007). The method of Jaegger et al. is now utilized to measure pelvic limb joint angles for ongoing natural history and preclinical trials in our laboratory. Based on our preliminary natural history findings collected at 6 months of age, GRMD dogs tend to have more restricted maximal flexion of the hip joint, increased maximal stifle extension, and more acute maximal tibiotarsal flexion. To objectively characterize the cranioventral shift of the pelvis typically seen in GRMD dogs, we also measure the angle formed by two lines extending cranially from the tuber ischium, one drawn parallel to the lumbar spine and the other extending to the midpoint of the tuber coxae. Consistent with a previous report in which the pelvis was shown to shift into essentially a vertical position in some severely affected dogs (Brumitt et al. 2006), this angle has been larger in GRMD versus normal dogs at 6 months of age. Although these pelvic limb joint angle data are preliminary and correlations have not yet been completed, we believe proximal joint and postural changes may contribute to the characteristic plantigrade tarsal stance in GRMD, just as relative sparing of proximal flexor muscles plays a role in distal limb flexor contractures in DMD (Vignos and Archibald 1960; Siegel et al. 1968). Indeed, cranial sartorius circumference corrected for body weight correlates negatively with tibiotarsal joint angle, as measured by our original method (Kornegay et al. 2003). This suggests that the hypertrophied muscle might play a role analogous to iliotibial band tightness in DMD (Rideau 1984).
Force/torque measurements
We have demonstrated that GRMD dogs have decreased strength of individual (Kornegay et al. 1994a) and grouped (Kornegay et al. 1999) muscles. In our first study, tension was measured longitudinally in the peroneus longus, using a tendon suture to secure the muscle to a transducer. Tension was clearly lower than normal at 3 months of age but approached normal values by 6 months (Kornegay et al. 1994a). Subsequent studies have focused principally on measurement of torque generated by the tibiotarsal joint (Kornegay et al. 1999). For initial studies, force values were not corrected for the lever arm (metatarsus) length and were reported in newtons. We now multiply the force value by the length of the metatarsus {newton-meters (N-m)] (torque). The peroneal and tibial nerves are stimulated percutaneously so that the paw pulls (peroneal nerve, flexion) or pushes against (tibial nerve, extension) a lever interfaced with a force transducer. Our initial study assessed force at 3, 4.5, 6, and 12 months of age. Absolute and body-weight-corrected GRMD twitch and tetanic force values were lower than normal at all ages (P < 0.01 for most). However, tibiotarsal flexion and extension were differentially affected. Flexion values were especially low at 3 months, whereas extension was affected more at later ages. Several other GRMD findings differed from normal. The twitch/tetany ratio was generally lower, post-tetanic potentiation for flexion values was less marked, and extension relaxation and contraction times were longer. The consistency of GRMD values was studied to determine which measurements would be most useful in evaluating treatment outcome. Standard deviation was proportionally greater for GRMD versus normal recordings. More consistent values were seen for tetany versus twitch and for flexion versus extension. Left and right limb tetanic flexion values did not differ in GRMD; extension values were more variable. These results suggested that measurement of tibiotarsal tetanic flexion force should be most useful to document therapeutic benefit in GRMD dogs. Groups of 15 and 5 would be necessary to demonstrate differences of 0.2 and 0.4 in the means of treated and untreated GRMD dogs at 6 months of age, with associated powers of 0.824 and 0.856, respectively (Sigma Stat, Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA, USA). Values for extension force were more variable, suggesting that larger group sizes would be required to demonstrate significance. However, extension force was used as an outcome parameter to show that electromyographically (EMG) versus anatomically guided injection of botulinum toxin achieved an ~20–25% greater effect (P < 0.05) in three normal beagle dogs (Childers et al. 1998). We have also demonstrated therapeutic benefit using both increased extension (~60%) and paradoxical decreased flexion (~40%) (both P < 0.05) with prednisone using a group size of six GRMD dogs (Liu et al. 2004).
Eccentric contraction decrement
Dystrophin serves to buttress the muscle cell membrane. In the absence of dystrophin, the membrane is prone to tearing during minimal exercise. Dystrophic muscles are particularly prone to injury subsequent to eccentric (lengthening) contractions (Edwards et al. 1984). As an example, mdx mice have normal or slightly higher absolute force measurements but demonstrate greater-than-normal force decrement after eccentric muscle contractions (Moens et al. 1993). In an initial study of GRMD dogs, we induced eccentric contractions in flexor muscles of the cranial tibial compartment of the pelvic limb by stimulating the sciatic trunk in the mid-thigh area (Childers et al. 2002). This caused contraction of both the tibiotarsal joint flexors and extensors. Because the extensors are more powerful, eccentric (lengthening) contractions were induced in the flexors. More recently, we have developed a technique whereby the common peroneal nerve is stimulated while simultaneously extending the tibiotarsal joint with a servomotor (Aurora Scientific, Aurora, ON, Canada) coupled to a lever arm (Tegeler et al. 2010; Childers et al. 2011) (Fig. 3). Movement of the lever arm is controlled by a computer and customized LabView software (Aurora Scientific). Eccentric contractions are induced using square wave pulses of 100-μs duration in a tetanic run for 700 ms at a frequency of 50 Hz. The contraction is held isometric at optimal muscle length (Lo) for the first 500 ms. For the final 200 ms, the muscles of the cranial tibial compartment are stretched by the servomotor at 0.5 Lo/s such that the muscles are displaced 0.1 Lo. Thus, the muscles of the cranial tibial compartment are repeatedly stretched to induce mechanical damage. Three sets of ten stretches are performed. Each individual stretch is separated by 5 s and a 4-min rest is provided between the three sets. Contraction-induced injury is quantified by the force (torque) deficit (F d) using the following equation: F d = (maximal isometric tetanic force [P o] before stretch − P o after stretch \( \div \) P o before stretch) × 100. We have shown that the decrement in normal dogs after 30 stretches does not exceed ~25%, while that of GRMD dogs can be as high as ~85% (Tegeler et al. 2010). The sequence of decrement over the groups of contractions needs to be more critically evaluated to determine the optimal point where normal and GRMD dogs can be distinguished.
Cardiac evaluation
Specific mutations in the dystrophin gene cause distinct cardiac syndromes in DMD (Cox and Kunkel 1997; Muntoni 2003; Jefferies et al. 2005; Connuck et al. 2008), BMD (Nigro et al. 1995; Melacini et al. 1996; Saito et al. 1996; Holloway et al. 2008), and X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy (XLDCM) (Ferlini et al. 1999). The severity of cardiac dysfunction in these conditions varies from subclinical disease to fatal congestive heart failure. There tends to be an inverse relationship between skeletal and cardiac muscle involvement (Saito et al. 1996; Connuck et al. 2008). DMD and BMD carriers may also have cardiomyopathy (Hoogerwaard et al. 1999; Holloway et al. 2008).
Electrocardiographic (Moise et al. 1991; Yugeta et al. 2006), echocardiographic (Moise et al. 1991; Chetboul et al. 2004; Yugeta et al. 2006), radionuclide angiographic (Devaux et al. 1993), cardiac MRI (Kellman et al. 2009), and cardiac pathologic (Valentine et al. 1989a) studies have been completed in dogs with GRMD. Additional longitudinal studies have been completed in crossbred dogs with the GRMD splice site and Labrador retriever insertion mutations (Fine et al. 2011). Given that the dystrophin gene mutation can influence cardiac phenotype (Jefferies et al. 2005), it is not clear whether changes in these dogs mirror those of GRMD. GRMD dogs have ventricular arrhythmias and increased Q/R ratios due to characteristic deep Q waves on ECG evaluation (Moise et al. 1991; Yugeta et al. 2006); evidence of ventricular dilation and decreased fractional shortening, together with increased echogenicity that corresponds to mineralization at necropsy, with two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography (Moise et al. 1991; Yugeta et al. 2006); decreased radial and longitudinal left ventricular motions with tissue Doppler imaging (Chetboul et al. 2004); and myocardial fibrosis and mineralization on pathologic evaluation as early as 6.5 months of age (Valentine et al. 1989a). Electrocardiographic changes are seen at 6 months and progress with age (Moise et al. 1991; Yugeta et al. 2006). Ventricular measurements and shortening fraction determined with two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography are usually within the normal range over the first 2 years of life (Moise et al. 1991; Yugeta et al. 2006). The original echocardiographic studies done by Moise et al. (1991) identified areas of increased echogenicity within the posterobasal left ventricular wall in 6-month-old GRMD dogs, with progression over time to the apex of the heart. Areas of increased echogenicity were not seen in a later study of 6 to 21-month-old GRMD dogs crossed to beagles (Yugeta et al. 2006), in keeping with a trend for outbreeding to lessen severity of the GRMD phenotype (Kornegay et al. 2011). On pathologic evaluation, fibrosis is most pronounced in the left ventricular papillary muscle and apical left ventricular free wall (Valentine et al. 1989a). Fatty deposition is seen in older dogs. Mineralization appears to be more pronounced than in DMD. Analogous ECG and echocardiographic changes progressed over the course of 3-, 6-, and 12-month evaluations in the GRMD–Labrador retriever muscular dystrophy crossbred dogs, suggesting that such markers can be used in preclinical trials (Fine et al. 2011).
Working with investigators at NHLBI, we have completed preliminary cardiac MRI studies on two GRMD dogs and a Welsh corgi with the intron 13 insertion mutation (dogs 1, 5, and 12 in Table 2) (Kellman et al. 2009). These studies focused on defining the degree of fibrosis and fat deposition within the myocardium using multiecho Dixon methods pre- and post-late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and a segmented phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) turbo FLASH sequence. Retrogated cardiac cine true-fast imaging with a steady-state precession (FISP) sequence was used to assess left ventricular function. Intramural fat was clearly seen with precontrast, fat-separated images. Corresponding hyperenhanced lesions were noted with LGE. Intramural fibrosis, distinguished from fat on the LGE water-phase image, was also evident. Left ventricular ejection fractions were reduced in the two GRMD dogs (22 and 26%) and were normal in the Welsh corgi (53%), approximating values seen with echocardiography (Table 2).
We have conducted cardiac evaluations, including ECG and echocardiography, on 11 GRMD dogs ranging from 7 months to 9 years of age at North Carolina State University (J. N. Kornegay et al., unpublished) (Table 2). Most were breeding males without clinical heart disease; nine had abnormalities on ECG and/or echocardiography (Fig. 4). A diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) was made in seven of them. Several dogs had systolic murmurs best heard in the left apical area. Sinus arrhythmia, occasional premature ventricular contractions, prolonged (>60 ms) QRS complexes, and deep Q waves were noted on ECG. Structural and functional changes were seen with echocardiography. In particular, the myocardium was mottled, consistent with fatty deposition and fibrosis, and there was cardiomegaly, as evidenced by chamber dilation/enlargement. Functional indices such as fractional shortening and ejection fraction were often decreased. Two of the dogs had mitral regurgitation. Several of the dogs with DCM have been treated with ACE inhibitors (enalapril), β blockers (atenolol), and/or phosphodiesterase inhibitors (pimobendan).
We saw acute death, presumably due to an arrhythmia, in a GRMD carrier that had dramatic myocardial fibrosis at necropsy. This prompted us to complete a prospective study of cardiac function, including Holter monitoring and necropsy, of a group of GRMD carriers. Some dogs had dramatic ventricular arrhythmias and all had myocardial fibrosis at necropsy (A. M. Kane et al., unpublished).
Cardiac pathologic studies have been performed on GRMD dogs from our colony that died or were euthanized. Gross and histologic findings have been consistent with those described previously (Valentine et al. 1989a). Cardiomegaly, due particularly to left ventricular dilation, is seen grossly. Mineralization and focal to generalized fibrosis are present on histologic evaluation.
Skeletal muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
MRI has been used increasingly to provide meaningful data on the natural history and response to therapy of a number of diseases, including DMD (Lamminen 1990; Liu et al. 1993; Marden et al. 2005; Lovitt et al. 2006). Principal MRI changes in DMD include an increase in T2 and a decrease in T1 relaxation times due to accumulation of fat in affected muscles and an associated increase in whole-body fat and a decrease in muscle mass. Objective grading systems allow data to be compared over the course of the disease (Lamminen 1990; Liu et al. 1993). Results from these grading systems have correlated with those of clinical function tests. One serial study suggested that MRI is more sensitive than function tests in predicting disease progression (Liu et al. 1993). MRI has also been used to monitor DMD disease progression in treatment trials (Karpati et al. 1993; Miller et al. 1997).
The potential role of MRI as a biomarker in GRMD has been reported in both natural history and preclinical papers. In the first study, the thoracic limbs of 2-month-old GRMD and normal dogs were scanned at 4 T (Thibaud et al. 2007). GRMD dogs had an abnormally high T2-weighted/T1-weighted signal ratio, greater T2-weighted image heterogeneity, and more pronounced signal enhancement post-contrast. An additional study of 3-month-old GRMD dogs showed increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images in which the fat signal was suppressed, increased T2 values, and greater enhancement with gadolinium, all consistent with inflammation associated with early necrosis (Kobayashi et al. 2009). T2 signal was decreased in GRMD dogs treated systemically with morpholinos compared to age-matched untreated dogs, supporting the notion that MRI can be used to track improvement in longitudinal studies (Yokota et al. 2009). An additional study showed that increased signal on T2-weighted images could be used to identify sites of adeno-associated virus (AAV)–microdystrophin construct injection (Wang et al. 2010). As discussed further below, we have also seen increased signal intensity in muscles associated with an apparent innate immune response in dogs treated with AAV-9 and a codon-optimized human minidystrophin (Kornegay et al. 2010). Moreover, MRI has been used to track the distribution of fluid in dogs treated with AAV-minidystrophin constructs delivered by regional limb delivery (see Fig. 8).
We have completed MRI studies in ~50 GRMD dogs (Wang et al. 2011; J. N. Kornegay et al., unpublished). Some of these have been longitudinal studies and others have been at single time points. Consistent with published studies, signal-intense lesions, presumably corresponding to fluid accumulation in necrotic lesions, have been seen on fat-suppressed, T2-weighted images in younger dogs, while increased fat deposition has been seen at later ages (Fig. 5). The severity of these changes has varied among muscles. We have been particularly interested in assessing volumetric and T2 signal values longitudinally in GRMD dogs between 3 and 12 months of age, as this time frame has most commonly been used for preclinical studies by our group and others. Water and fat values are calculated separately on T2-weighted images so as to gain insight on their relative contribution to the T2 signal (data not reported here).
Preliminary results have been evaluated in five GRMD and ten age-matched normal dogs in which six proximal pelvic limb muscles (semitendinosus, rectus femoris, cranial sartorius, adductor magnus, gracilis, and biceps femoris) were evaluated as part of an ongoing natural history study. T2 values were higher than normal in each of the six GRMD muscles at all ages, and these values declined in both groups from the 3- to the 9–12-month age group (Table 3; Fig. 6). Body-weight-corrected muscle volumes varied, with the GRMD cranial sartorius being markedly larger than normal at 6 and 9–12 months (Table 4), as we have previously reported (Kornegay et al. 2003). The GRMD semitendinosus muscle was also larger, while the rectus femoris and biceps femoris were smaller. Body-weight-corrected volumetric values for the gracilis and adductor muscles were comparable in GRMD versus normal dogs.
Electromyographic and single-fiber studies
Electromyography (EMG) can be used to objectively characterize muscle in both natural history and treatment studies. As with other myopathies, DMD is characterized by small, polyphasic, short-duration motor unit potentials (MUPs), with associated spontaneous activity ranging from fibrillation potentials to complex repetitive discharges (CRDs) (Buchthal and Rosenfalck 1963; Desmedt and Borenstein 1976; Emeryk-Szajewska and Kopeć 2008). EMG was performed in the two original GRMD dogs studied by our group at 3, 5, 7, and 34 months of age (Kornegay et al. 1988). There were persistent, spontaneous, high-frequency discharges of constant amplitude, with frequency components of up to 2,000 Hz on power spectral analysis. In a subsequent study to which we contributed, seven GRMD dogs produced in the Cornell colony were evaluated between the ages of 6 weeks and 5.5 years of age (Valentine et al. 1989b). Spontaneous activity, consisting primarily of CRDs, positive sharp waves, and polyphasic potentials, was found in all dogs. Motor unit potentials were of short duration and polyphasic. Abnormalities were rare at 6 weeks but easily detected at 8–10 weeks. Taken together, these changes were consistent with those seen in DMD. However, the CRDs were much more prominent in affected dogs.
Details of motor unit architecture and function are not adequately quantified by conventional EMG. In contrast, quantitative EMG (Nandedkar et al. 1995) allows one to map objective motor unit parameters over the natural course of disease or in response to treatment. Despite these diagnostic advantages, quantitative measures of the motor unit have not been assessed in animal models of muscular dystrophy and only on a limited basis in DMD patients. An ongoing natural history study by our group has included concentric needle EMG and multi-motor unit potential (multi-MUP) analysis on the cranial sartorius, cranial tibialis, gastrocnemius lateral head, and vastus lateralis muscles of a total of 10 GRMD and 15 normal dogs between 2 months and 4 years of age (R. Bhavaraju-Sanka R, J. N. Kornegay, and J. F. Howard, unpublished). Data collected included presence and severity of spontaneous activity and MUP amplitude, duration, turns, phases, and polyphasicity. GRMD dogs exhibited widespread CRDs at all ages that often made it hard to perform multi-MUP analysis. When data from all ages were compared, multi-MUP analysis showed reduced MUP duration and amplitude with smaller MUP areas in GRMD versus controls. In comparing data from three each of GRMD and normal dogs at 2–3 and 9–12 months age, differences in MUP duration and area were evident at both ages, while amplitude normalized somewhat in the older dogs.
Single-fiber EMG (SFEMG) action potentials can be recorded from individual muscle fibers (Hilton-Brown et al. 1985; Sanders and Stalberg 1996). Two particular parameters, jitter and fiber density, offer insight into mechanisms contributing to neuromuscular disease. Jitter refers to the variable speed with which nerve impulses are transmitted across motor endplates and is typically expressed as the mean of consecutive differences (MCD) of interpotential intervals. Up to 40% of DMD patients have increased jitter, presumably due to abnormal motor endplates associated with diseased or regenerating muscle fibers (Hilton-Brown et al. 1985; Sanders and Stalberg 1996). Fiber density is defined based on the number of individual myofiber action potentials recorded at one time with the SFEMG electrode. DMD patients have increased fiber density, most likely as a function of myofiber proliferation/regeneration in response to the dystrophic process (Hilton-Brown et al. 1985; Sanders and Stalberg 1996). Building on an earlier study of SFEMG in normal dogs (Hopkins et al. 1993), we have assessed stimulation (s)SFEMG in the peroneus longus and cranial tibialis muscles of most of the dogs included in the quantitative EMG studies (Fig. 7). After the dogs were anesthetized, 10–20 fibers were recorded from each muscle and neuromuscular jitter (MCD) was measured. The affected dogs exhibited increased jitter in both muscles, with MCD values of ~30 ms compared to ~15 ms in normal dogs. There was also more impulse blocking in the affected dogs. In addition, an increase in the fiber density estimate was inferred by the greater number of action potentials at each stimulation site (data not presented; see Fig. 7).
Pathologic studies
Gross and histopathologic lesions vary remarkably among dystrophin-deficient muscles (Kornegay et al. 1988; Valentine et al. 1990; Childers et al. 2001; Nguyen et al. 2002; Cozzi et al. 2001; Kornegay et al. 2003). At the light microscopic level, there is a pattern of small group myofiber necrosis and regeneration, which is typical of dystrophin-deficient muscular dystrophy across species. Fiber size variation occurs due to the combined effects of individual myofiber hypertrophy and a marked increase in small regenerating fibers. Necrotic myofibers typically are in various states of degeneration, ranging from swollen, granular (so-called hyaline or hypercontracted) myofibers that stain intensely eosinophilic with H&E to fragmented fibers that are undergoing necrosis and mineralization (calcification), with an associated infiltrate of macrophages (myophagocytosis) and other mononuclear inflammatory cells. As necrotic material is removed by the monocyte–macrophage system, only the basal lamina of affected myofibers may remain, resulting in empty sarcolemmal tubes. On longitudinal section, necrosis occurs segmentally along the length of the myofiber, in keeping with the domain of individual nuclei. Regenerating fibers tend to occur in clusters, often closely associated with areas of necrosis, and are small with prominent nuclei/nucleoli and basophilic cytoplasm. Sarcolemmal nuclei may be located centrally within the myofiber (so-called central or internal nuclei) rather than peripherally. On histochemical stains, type II fibers are preferentially affected, with an associated predominance of type 1 fibers and fiber-type grouping (Kornegay et al. 1988). Intermediate fiber types, apparently reflecting immaturity associated with regeneration, occur commonly in neonatal GRMD muscles (Nguyen et al. 2002). Myosin isoform expression is altered and utrophin is increased (Lanfossi et al. 1999). In a prednisone preclinical trial in GRMD, we attributed reduced numbers of fetal myosin-positive fibers in treated dogs to a reduction in necrosis and an accompanying decrease in demand for regeneration (Liu et al. 2004). Electron microscopic changes evident in affected fibers include disruption of myofibrillar organization, dilatation of sarcoplasmic reticulum, increased glycogen, and both hyperplasia and hypertrophy of mitochondria (Kornegay et al. 1988; Valentine et al. 1990).
The pattern of muscle involvement must be carefully considered when assessing functional and pathologic results from preclinical trials. As with DMD and the mdx mouse, the extraocular muscles are largely spared in GRMD (Valentine et al. 1990; Nguyen et al. 2002). In sharp contrast, muscles that are used heavily in utero and early in life, such as the tongue, diaphragm, and limb flexors (including the sartorius, semitendinosus, and cranial tibialis), demonstrate acute necrosis (Valentine et al. 1990; Nguyen et al. 2002). Other muscles are spared early in life and develop lesions later. This delayed pattern of necrosis is more typical of extensor muscles, which presumably do not become severely affected until dogs begin walking, and muscles such as the quadriceps femoris experience eccentric contractions. Cozzi et al. showed that necrosis in the cranial tibialis and quadriceps femoris occurs in phases, with lesions increasing from days 2 to 30, decreasing at 60 days to 0.8%, and then increasing in older animals to a stable level of around 2%. Interestingly, the rectus femoris responds differently than the other three heads of the quadriceps as it shows severe early lesions, probably because of its origin from the pelvis and dual role as a hip flexor and stifle extensor (Nguyen et al. 2002). The long digital extensor of the pelvic limb also has a dual function as a digital extensor and tibiotarsal flexor. Unlike the cranial tibialis, which is a strict tibiotarsal flexor and undergoes moderate (Nguyen et al. 2002) to severe (Valentine et al. 1990) necrosis in neonates, the long digital extensor was unaffected in one study of GRMD neonatal lesions (Nguyen et al. 2002). Thus, again, the flexor function seemed to drive the pattern of early necrosis.
Muscles that undergo early necrosis may then regenerate and even hypertrophy. This pattern is perhaps best represented by the cranial sartorius. We have shown it seemingly recovers remarkably from the initial necrosis and then can reach two to three times normal size when corrected for body weight (Kornegay et al. 2003). Based on morphometric histological studies, the cranial sartorius demonstrates true hypertrophy in GRMD dogs aged 4–10 months. Muscle is then replaced by fat and connective tissue, giving a pattern more in keeping with the pseudohypertrophy that has classically been described in DMD. Recent imaging studies in DMD have suggested that some muscles, including the sartorius (Marden et al. 2005), are relatively spared or even hypertrophied. Moreover, the gastrocnemius, which has typically been thought to exhibit pseudohypertrophy, may initially undergo true hypertrophy in some patients (Cros et al. 1989). We believe true hypertrophy of the cranial sartorius and other muscles may have clinical significance in that imbalances between differentially affected agonist and antagonist muscles can contribute to contractures (see earlier discussion under joint angles).
Use of the GRMD model in treatment development for DMD
Preclinical studies
Potential treatments for DMD may be broadly categorized as molecular, cellular, or pharmacologic (Chakkalakal et al. 2005; Goyenvalle et al. 2011). The two most common molecular approaches are gene therapy, whereby the dystrophin gene is introduced into muscle either locally or through the vasculature, generally using plasmids or viral vectors, and gene correction, which involves introduction of oligonucleotides (chimeric or antisense) to induce either inherent repair mechanisms or exon skipping to reestablish the correct nucleotide sequence (reading frame). With cell-based therapies, normal cells such as myoblasts or stem cells are transplanted into diseased muscle. Pharmacologic approaches do not deliver the defective gene and/or protein to the diseased muscle(s). Instead, specific pathogenetic mechanisms that contribute to the dystrophic phenotype are targeted. Examples include compounds that reduce inflammation (NF-kB inhibition), increase muscle mass (insulin-like growth factor, myostatin inhibition), read through stop codons in the defective dystrophin gene (aminoglycoside antibiotics), or increase production of utrophin (the autosomal homolog of dystrophin). Essentially all preclinical studies conducted thus far in dystrophin-deficient dogs have been completed in the GRMD model (Table 5).
Plasmid- and vector-based gene therapy
Howell et al. (1998a) showed that GRMD myofibers can be transduced for at least 14 days using plasmids containing full-length dystrophin and minidystrophin cDNA. Adenovirus-mediated minidystrophin (Howell et al. 1998b) and utrophin (Cerletti et al. 2003) transfer have also been achieved in immunosuppressed GRMD dogs. Gilbert et al. demonstrated by intramuscular injection in a GRMD dog that gene products encoded by first-generation adenoviruses increased dystrophin expression carried by a helper-dependent adenovirus lacking all or most viral antigens (Gilbert et al. 2001). In other GRMD studies, dystrophin minigene transfer with an AAV vector was limited by a marked immunologic response to viral capsid antigens (Wang et al. 2007a) that could be blocked with brief immunosuppression (Wang et al. 2007b). Others have suggested that the immune response occurs against components of the construct, including dystrophin itself (Yuasa et al. 2007).
We have completed a series of studies of AAV-minidystrophin constructs in GRMD dogs to simultaneously extend mdx studies (Wang et al. 2009) and clarify the source of the immune response (J. Li, J. R. Bogan, D. J. Bogan, J. N. Kornegay, and X. Xiao, unpublished). Our initial studies focused on demonstrating the immunologic reaction to constructs. A total of six GRMD and eight normal dogs were injected intramuscularly with AAV-1 or -2 constructs containing the LacZ reporter gene or human minidystrophin gene. Preliminary data from direct muscle injection showed a greater immunologic reaction than that encountered in the mdx mouse. The degree of immunologic reaction was reduced when the canine instead of the human minidystrophin gene was used. Ohshima et al. also identified a cellular immune response to AAV-2 and 8 vectors expressing LacZ in Japanese crossbred GRMD dogs (Ohshima et al. 2009). These results indicate that direct intramuscular injection of AAV constructs causes a marked immune response not observed in mice, suggesting species differences to AAV-mediated local intramuscular gene transfer. In a separate safety study in which an AAV-minidystrophin construct was injected intramuscularly in DMD patients, T cells were shown to target the therapeutic transgene (Mendell et al. 2010). Cells were present in two patients prior to treatment, presumably having become sensitized to dystrophin epitopes on preexisting revertant myofibers.
We and others (Ohshima et al. 2009) have delivered similar AAV-based minidystrophin gene constructs via an afferent transvenular retrograde extravasation (ATVRX; regional limb) method for somatic gene transfer to muscles with favorable results. A total of 33 (20 normal and 13 GRMD) dogs have been injected by our group using various constructs and perfusion volumes/rates. AAV-8 or -9 and canine minidystrophin have been used in the most recent studies (Li et al. 2009). Widespread minidystrophin gene expression has been seen in muscles of the perfused limb without immunosuppression, establishing the utility of AAV-mediated regional limb therapy in GRMD. The distribution of the perfusion fluid has been mapped with MRI (Fig. 8). Some of these dogs have also been evaluated with the functional biomarkers discussed above. Isometric tibiotarsal extension force was intermediate between GRMD and normal natural history values in three GRMD dogs treated with AAV-8 or 9-minidystrophin constructs. Values had also normalized somewhat in the contralateral limb, suggesting a systemic effect (see further below). However, the degree of eccentric contraction decrement did not improve in the treated GRMD dogs. The remarkable differences in cellular immunity between local intramuscular injection and vasculature-mediated regional limb gene transfer by AAV vectors suggest that the gene delivery route is an important factor to be considered for clinical studies. With these promising results, a parallel phase 1 safety study of regional limb delivery of saline was initiated in adult muscular dystrophy patients (Fan et al. 2011). This study has demonstrated overall safety, with minimal side effects.
Ultimately, gene therapy strategies must extend to systemic delivery to achieve widespread muscle transduction. Initial canine studies have utilized neonatal dogs in an effort to minimize the immune response and achieve widespread delivery. Working with the Duan laboratory, we demonstrated widespread muscle transduction of a human placental alkaline phosphatase reporter gene carried by an AAV-9 vector administered intravenously without immunosuppression to normal pups (Yue et al. 2008). Subsequently, in collaboration with Xiao, GRMD dogs given a single intravenous injection of an AAV-9 vector carrying a human codon-optimized human minidystrophin gene showed generalized muscle transduction in ~15% to nearly 100% of myofibers (Kornegay et al. 2010). However, these pups showed delayed growth and pelvic limb muscle atrophy and contractures, seemingly due to an innate immune response and exacerbated by the use of a high dose of codon-optimized human minidystrophin. Marked increased signal intensity, compatible with inflammation, was seen with T2 fat-suppressed MRI in the vastus heads of the quadriceps femoris and adductor muscles of these dogs. Analogous selective involvement of the vastus heads, with sparing of the rectus femoris, is seen in humans with sporadic inclusion myositis (Phillips et al. 2001). Similarly, dogs with Neospora caninum infection develop hyperextension of the stifle (knee) (genu recurvatum) secondary to quadriceps myositis and contractures (Knowler and Wheeler 1995). Surprisingly, when some of the older GRMD dogs received minidystrophin via regional limb delivery, there was dramatic body-wide minidystrophin gene expression, apparently due to leakage beyond the tourniquet (Li et al. 2009). This prompted us to initiate studies of systemic AAV–minidystrophin gene delivery in GRMD dogs at a few months of age. Preliminary results have been promising, as widespread and persistent gene expression was seen in one dog treated with an AAV-9–minidystrophin construct.
Gene repair
Chimeric oligonucleotides were used to induce normal host cell mismatch repair mechanisms to correct the splice site mutation in a GRMD dog (Bartlett et al. 2000). Antisense oligonucleotides (morpholino) given intravenously in three GRMD dogs (Japanese beagle cross) over a period of up to 5.5 months resulted in functional and pathologic improvement, in addition to reduced T2 signal intensity on MRI (Yokota et al. 2009). A limited clinical trial of a morpholino-based exon-skipping strategy in DMD patients showed modest dystrophin expression in muscle fibers (Cirak et al. 2011). Percutaneous transendocardial delivery of recombinant AAV6 was used to deliver a modified U7 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) carrying an antisense sequence to target splicing enhancers of exons 6 and 8 and correct the mRNA reading frame in a group of five GRMD dogs without immunosuppression. Cardiac dystrophin expression was restored for up to 13 months (duration of study), with associated improved cardiac function as assessed by cardiac MRI (Bish et al. 2011b).
Cell-based therapies
While much attention has shifted to virus-based gene therapy, there continues to be considerable interest in cellular approaches, in part because of the need for cell replacement in more chronic cases. A variety of adult, fetal, and embryonic stem cells can potentially contribute to regeneration of diseased muscle. Myoblasts and their parent satellite cells were the obvious choice for initial studies. Partridge et al. (1978) showed that donor myoblasts could fuse with host cells in a murine muscle injury model and restore dystrophin expression in the mdx mouse (Partridge et al. 1989). Human DMD clinical trials were ultimately conducted in the 1990s (Tremblay et al. 1993; Miller et al. 1997). Follow-up studies of treated patients did not show functional gains, although some donor cells could be detected in the muscles (Gussoni et al. 1997). Further clinical trials were halted. The limited success of these trials could be attributed to a high degree of initial cell death due presumably to the combined effects of poor blood supply to the injected cell bolus and immune rejection, plus limited migration of the surviving injected cells (Tremblay et al. 1993; Fan et al. 1996; Gussoni et al. 1997; Smythe et al. 2001; Partridge 2002; Skuk et al. 2007).
We characterized canine myoblasts and conducted transplantation studies in the GRMD model during the 1990s (Prattis et al. 1993; Nakagaki et al. 1994a, 1994b). However, we were unable to achieve significant implantation of myoblasts in GRMD dogs. In the context of these studies, we developed an autologous myoblast transplantation model in which cells were labeled with fluorescent microspheres and injected in preirradiated 3-month-old normal dogs as part of a cocktail that included the muscle toxin notexin and methylene blue. In subsequent studies at 7 and 24 days post-transplantation, large groups of injected cells formed fascicles and expressed ATPase (Fig. 9), providing support for the general principle that myoblasts could implant and differentiate in dogs (Kornegay et al. 1992).
The Tremblay laboratory has done extensive work on myoblast transplantation in multiple species, including dogs (Ito et al. 1998). They used a lentivirus vector to introduce a dog microdystrophin cDNA into dystrophic dog muscle precursor cells and then injected these transfected cells into normal dogs (Pichavant et al. 2010). Others have shown that the level of myoblast implantation can potentially be increased in GRMD dogs by first inducing tolerance through hematopoietic cell transplantation (Parker et al. 2008). In a separate earlier study, cardiomyocytes were stably engrafted in the hearts of GRMD dogs (Koh et al. 1995).
Bone marrow provides a paradigm for an accessible and pluripotent stem cell population. Despite promising results in mdx mice (Corti et al. 2002), bone marrow stem cell (BMSC) transplantation did not restore dystrophin expression in GRMD dogs (Dell’Agnola et al. 2004). While there was successful allogeneic bone marrow engraftment, BMSCs did not contribute either skeletal muscle or muscle precursor cells. Other adult stem cell populations may contribute to muscle regeneration. Mesoangioblasts are mesodermal stem cells derived from the vascular wall that contribute to muscle regeneration in both mice and dogs (De Angelis et al. 1999; Sampaolesi et al. 2006). These cells are multipotent, with the capacity to give rise to osteogenic, adipogenic, myogenic, and endothelial lineages (Minasi et al. 2002). Cossu and colleagues showed that a clinically relevant cell mass can be obtained for transplant into the GRMD model and that mesoangioblasts injected in the femoral artery gained access to muscle through downstream capillary beds (Sampaolesi et al. 2006). GRMD dogs treated with mesoangioblasts had immunohistochemical and Western blot evidence of dystrophin expression. However, questions have been raised about the outcome parameters used and the role that immunosuppression may have played in improvement (Bretag 2007).
Human immature dental pulp stem cells were transplanted by either arterial or muscular injections into four young GRMD littermate dogs by Mayana Zatz's laboratory (Kerkis et al. 2008). Cell implantation, chimeric fibers, and minimal dystrophin expression were seen. In two recent studies from this same group, muscular implantation was achieved after systemic administration of umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs; intra-arterial) (Zucconi et al. 2011) and human adipose-derived stromal cells (hASCs; intravenous) (Vieira et al. 2011) in GRMD dogs. Immunosuppression was not used in either study. Donor–recipient pairs were matched for the dog leukocyte antigen (DLA; major histocompatibility complex) in the MSC study but not for hASCs. While dystrophin was evident with hASCs, there was no expression with MSCs. In another study, intra-arterial delivery of allogenic muscle stem cells led to long-term dystrophin expression and apparent stabilization of pathologic lesions and clinical function in three GRMD dogs (Rouger et al. 2011).
Pharmacological therapies
The GRMD model has been used less frequently for pharmacologic approaches. Perhaps because of the perceived lower risk of such treatments, there has been a tendency to go directly from mdx mouse studies to human trials. In preparation for high-dose and early-treatment regimens of prednisone that might be impractical in human patients, we showed that a dose of 2 mg/kg orally once daily for 4 months in dogs from 2 to 6 months of age increased extensor muscle force in GRMD dogs, while causing a paradoxical decrease in flexor force (Liu et al. 2004). The reduced flexor force probably occurred due to a reduction in early necrosis and a less pronounced regenerative response that can otherwise lead to functional hypertrophy. Treated dogs had remarkable myofiber mineralization, raising questions about potential deleterious side effects. Perhaps, most importantly, this prednisone preclinical trial established the 2–4-month time frame as an appropriate window for conducting pharmacologic studies in GRMD dogs.
Using GRMD dogs provided by our group, the Metzger laboratory demonstrated that chronic infusion of membrane-sealing poloxamer reduced myocardial fibrosis, blocked increases of serum cardiac troponin I and brain type natriuretic peptide, and prevented left ventricular remodeling (Townsend et al. 2010). A reduction in GRMD versus mdx mouse cardiac myocyte compliance was associated with a lack of utrophin upregulation in affected dogs, perhaps providing insight for their more severe cardiac phenotype. These results indicated that poloxamer may serve as an effective membrane-stabilizing chemical surrogate in dystrophin/utrophin deficiency.
Lee and colleagues have shown that the myostatin gene (growth/differentiation factor 8) is a key negative regulator of muscle growth (McPherron et al. 1997; Lee and McPherron 1999; Lee 2004; McPherron and Lee 2002). Dystrophin-deficient mdx mice in which myostatin is knocked out (Wagner et al. 2002) or inhibited postnatally (Wagner et al. 2005) have a less severe phenotype. Based in part on these results, there has been increasing interest in treatments to inhibit myostatin and thus promote muscle growth in DMD and other muscle-wasting disorders. We investigated whether myostatin blockade could be achieved by an AAV-8–canine myostatin propeptide construct in two normal 3-month-old dogs treated via regional limb delivery (Qiao et al. 2009). AAV vector DNA and propeptide gene expression were detected by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, and immunofluorescence staining of muscle biopsies. Overexpression of the myostatin propeptide resulted in enhanced muscle growth, as evidenced by larger myofibers in multiple muscles and increased muscle volume on MRI. Separately, using four each of treated and control 9–10-month-old GRMD dogs provided by our group, the Sweeney laboratory studied the muscle effects of liver-directed gene transfer of a self-complementary AAV-8 vector expressing a myostatin peptide (Bish et al. 2011a). Treated GRMD dogs had increased muscle mass as assessed by MRI and confirmed by necropsy, together with hypertrophy of type IIA fibers and reduced serum creatine kinase and muscle fibrosis. Independently, we have crossbred dystrophin-deficient GRMD dogs with whippets carrying a spontaneous two-nucleotide myostatin gene deletion (Mosher et al. 2007). A total of four dystrophic, myostatin-heterozygous GRippets and three dystrophic myostatin wild-type dogs from two litters have been evaluated at 6–8 months of age using some of the phenotypic tests discussed above. Rather than showing improvement, the dystrophic myostatin-heterozygous GRippets were more severely affected than their dystrophic myostatin wild-type littermates, apparently because disproportionate enlargement and atrophy/hypoplasia of certain muscles led to postural instability and joint contractures (J. N. Kornegay et al., unpublished).
The calpain and ubiquitin–proteasome systems are involved in muscle degradation. Inhibition of involved enzymes has been proposed as a treatment for DMD, based largely on evidence that enzyme activities are elevated in the mdx mouse and that blockade can improve their phenotype (Spencer et al. 1995; Badalamente and Stracher 2000; Bonuccelli et al. 2007). We evaluated the efficacy of a novel calpain inhibitor in 6-week-old GRMD dogs treated daily with either active compound (n = 9) or placebo (n = 7) for 8 weeks (Childers et al., in press). Several tests were performed at baseline and every 2 weeks over the course of therapy. Calpain inhibition did not improve tibiotarsal joint angle, increase tibiotarsal extension force, or reduce eccentric contraction decrement; furthermore, there was no improvement in lean muscle mass or muscle histopathologic changes. Thus, consistent with findings from a recent mdx mouse study (Selsby et al. 2010), we were unable to demonstrate efficacy for calpain inhibition in the GRMD model. Separately, in collaboration with the Willis laboratory, we have measured mRNA expression of ubiquitin–proteasome and calpain system components and calpain 1 and 2 and proteasome activities in several GRMD muscles and the heart at 6 months of age (Wadosky et al. 2011). Less than half of the muscles tested had increases in proteasome activity and only half had increased calpain activity. Moreover, numerous components of the ubiquitin–proteasome system were significantly decreased in the heart. These results illustrate that ubiquitin–proteasome and calpain system expression varies among skeletal muscles and the heart, suggesting that pharmacologic inhibition could lead to unexpected consequences.
Potential role for modifier genes in DMD and GRMD
Symptoms in DMD patients vary, even though most completely lack dystrophin, regardless of the specific gene mutation (Beggs et al. 1991; Winnard et al. 1993). Microarray gene expression profiling in DMD and dystrophin-deficient animals has provided a platform to study the role of modifier genes in phenotypic variation. Initial studies in both the mdx mouse (Porter et al. 2002) and DMD (Chen et al. 2000; Haslett et al. 2003) have generally shown upregulation of genes associated with inflammation and the regenerative response. With the advent of canine microarrays (Holzwarth et al. 2005), analogous studies have been done in dogs with various diseases (Clements et al. 2007). However, to our knowledge, expression arrays have not been evaluated in GRMD. As discussed above, we have collected functional data from GRMD dogs, in the context of both natural history and preclinical treatment studies. We also have muscle biopsy samples from many of these dogs. Importantly, these samples have been collected systematically from the same muscles at similar ages. Thus, by correlating expression array and functional data from these dogs, we should gain insight into the role that modifier genes play in phenotypic variation at both the individual dog and muscle level. In an ongoing study, we have performed 72 microarray profiles on the cranial sartorius, long digital extensor, and vastus lateralis muscles of eight GRMD and four normal dogs at 4–9 weeks and 6 months of age to evaluate mRNA expression on a genome-wide level (P. Nghiem et al., unpublished). So as to determine genes that could protect against the dystrophic phenotype, we identified specific transcripts of the dystrophin–glycoprotein complex that were associated with cranial sartorius size at 6 months of age. Follow-up immunofluorescent microscopy revealed expression of these proteins in the perimembranous region in all three muscles despite the lack of dystrophin. We were interested in identifying additional genes that could be driving muscle hypertrophy. Using quantitative PCR to confirm the array studies, targeted genes involved with muscle growth were confirmed to be differentially expressed within each muscle. In conclusion, expression profiling of multiple skeletal muscles revealed unique patterns of transcript expression in each muscle, suggesting specific molecular signatures in response to the primary molecular defect (Fig. 10). Therapies that target these genes could be beneficial in DMD.
Conclusion
Unlike the dystrophin-deficient mdx mouse, which remains relatively normal clinically, GRMD dogs develop progressive, fatal disease strikingly similar to the human condition. To better utilize the GRMD model in therapeutic trials, we and others have developed various phenotypic tests to objectively characterize disease progression. The availability of these tests has set the stage for use of GRMD dogs in preclinical trials. Indeed, as outlined in this review, the GRMD model has been used in a range of genetic, cellular, and pharmacologic studies, setting the stage for clinical trials in DMD.
References
Ambrόsio CE, Valadares MC, Zucconi E, Cabral R, Pearson PL, Gaiad TP, Canovas M, Vainzof M, Miglino MA, Zatz M (2008) Ringo, a Golden Retriever Muscular Dystrophy (GRMD) dog with absent dystrophin but normal strength. Neuromuscul Disord 18:892–893
Ambrόsio CE, Fadel L, Gaiad TP, Martins DS, Araujo KP, Zucconi E, Brolio MP, Giglio RF, Morini AC, Jazedje T, Froes TR, Feitosa ML, Valadares MC, Beltrao-Braga PC, Meirelles FV, Miglino MA (2009) Identification of three distinguishable phenotypes in golden retriever muscular dystrophy. Genet Mol Res 8:389–396
Badalamente MA, Stracher A (2000) Delay of muscle degeneration and necrosis in mdx mice by calpain inhibition. Muscle Nerve 23:106–111
Baltzer WI, Calise DV, Levine JM, Shelton GD, Edwards JF, Steiner JM (2007) Dystrophin-deficient muscular dystrophy in a Weimaraner. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 43:227–232
Barthélémy I, Barrey E, Thibaud JL, Uriarte A, Voit T, Blot S, Hogrel JV (2009) Gait analysis using accelerometry in dystrophin-deficient dogs. Neuromuscul Disord 19:788–796
Barthélémy I, Barrey E, Aguilar P, Uriarte A, Le Chevoir M, Thibaud JL, Voit T, Blot S, Hogrel JY (2011) Longitudinal ambulatory measurements of gait abnormality in dystrophin-deficient dogs. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:75
Bartlett RJ, Stockinger S, Denis MM, Bartlett WT, Inverardi L, Le TT, Man NT, Morris GE, Bogan DJ, Metcalf-Bogan J, Kornegay JN (2000) In vivo targeted repair of a point mutation in the canine dystrophin gene by a chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotide. Nat Biotech 18:615–622
Beggs AH, Koenig M, Boyce FM, Kunkel LM (1990) Detection of 98% of DMD/BMD gene deletions by polymerase chain reaction. Hum Genet 86:45–48
Beggs AH, Hoffman EP, Snyder JR, Arahata K, Specht L, Shapiro F, Angelini C, Sugita H, Kunkel LM (1991) Exploring the molecular basis for variability among patients with Becker muscular dystrophy: Dystrophin gene and protein studies. Am J Hum Genet 49:54–67
Bish LT, Sleeper MM, Forbes SC, Morine KJ, Reynolds C, Singletary GE, Trafny D, Bogan J, Kornegay JN, Walter GA, Sweeney HL (2011a) Long-term systemic myostatin inhibition via liver-targeted gene transfer in golden retriever muscular dystrophy. Hum Gene Ther, Jul 25, 2011 [Epub ahead of print]
Bish LT, Sleeper MM, Forbes SC, Wang B, Reynolds C, Singletary GE, Trafny D, Morine KJ, Sanmiguel J, Cecchini S, Virag T, Vulin A, Beley C, Bogan J, Wilson JM, Vandenborne K, Kornegay JN, Walter GA, Kotin RM, Garcia L, Sweeney HL (2011b) Long-term restoration of cardiac dystrophin expression in Golden Retriever Muscular Dystrophy following rAAV6-mediated exon skipping. Mol Ther, Dec 6, 2011 [Epub ahead of print]
Boddy KN, Roche BM, Schwartz DS, Nakayama T, Hamlin RL (2004) Evaluation of the six-minute walk test in dogs. Am J Vet Res 65:311–313
Bonuccelli G, Sotgia F, Capozza F, Gazzerro E, Minetti C, Lisanti MP (2007) Localized treatment with a novel FDA-approved proteasome inhibitor blocks the degradation of dystrophin and dystrophin-associated proteins in mdx mice. Cell Cycle 6:1242–1248
Bretag AH (2007) Stem cell treatment of dystrophic dogs. Nature 450(7173):E23 discussion E23–E25
Brooke MH, Fenichel GM, Griggs RC, Mendell JR, Moxley R, Miller JP, Province MA (1983) Clinical investigation in Duchenne dystrophy: 2. Determination of the “power” of therapeutic trials based on the natural history. Muscle Nerve 6:91–103
Brumitt JW, Essman SC, Kornegay JN, Graham P, Weber WJ, Berry CR (2006) Radiographic features of Golden Retriever muscular dystrophy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 47:574–580
Buchthal F, Rosenfalck P (1963) Electrophysiologic aspects of myopathy with particular reference to progressive muscular dystrophy. In: Bourne GH, Golarz MN (eds) Muscular Dystrophy in Man and Animals. Hafner Publishing Company, New York, pp 193–243
Bulfield G, Siller WG, Wight PAL, Moore KJ (1984) X chromosome-linked muscular dystrophy (mdx) in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:1189–1192
Caskey CT, Nussbaum RL, Cohan LC, Pollack L (1980) Sporadic occurrence of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: evidence for new mutation. Clin Genet 18:329–341
Cerletti M, Negri T, Cozzi F, Colpo R, Andreetta F, Croci D, Davies KE, Cornelio F, Pozza O, Karpati G, Gilbert R, Mora M (2003) Dystrophic phenotype of canine X-linked muscular dystrophy is mitigated by adenovirus-mediated utrophin gene transfer. Gene Ther 10:750–757
Chakkalakal JV, Thompson J, Parks RJ, Jasmin BJ (2005) Molecular, cellular, and pharmacological therapies for Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophies. FASEB J 19:880–891
Chen YW, Zhao P, Borup R, Hoffman EP (2000) Expression profiling in the muscular dystrophies: Identification of novel aspects of molecular pathophysiology. J Cell Biol 151:1321–1336
Chetboul V, Carlos C, Blot S, Thibaud JL, Escriou C, Tissier R, Retortillo JL, Pouchelon JL (2004) Tissue Doppler assessment of diastolic and systolic alterations of radial and longitudinal left ventricular motions in golden retrievers during the preclinical phase of cardiomyopathy associated with muscular dystrophy. Am J Vet Res 65:1335–1341
Childers MK, Kornegay JN, Aoki R, Otaviani L, Bogan DJ, Petroski G (1998) Evaluating motor endplate-targeted injections of botulinum toxin type A in a canine model. Muscle Nerve 21:653–655
Childers MK, Okamura CS, Bogan DJ, Bogan JR, Sullivan MJ, Kornegay JN (2001) Myofiber injury and regeneration in a canine homologue of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 80:175–181
Childers MK, Okamura CS, Bogan DJ, Bogan JR, Petroski GF, McDonald K, Kornegay JN (2002) Eccentric contraction injury in dystrophic canine muscle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:1572–1578
Childers MK, Grange RW, Kornegay JN (2011) In vivo canine muscle function assay. J Vis Exp (50). pii 2623
Childers MK, Bogan JR, Bogan DJ, Greiner H, Staley J, Holder M, Grange RW, Kornegay JN Chronic administration of a leupeptin-derived calpain inhibitor fails to ameliorate severe muscle pathology in a canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Front Integ Regen Pharmacol, in press
Cirak S, Arechavala-Gomeza V, Guglieri M, Feng L, Torelli S, Anthony K, Abbs S, Garralda ME, Bourke J, Wells DJ, Dickson G, Wood MJ, Wilton SD, Straub V, Kole R, Shrewsbury SB, Sewry C, Morgan JE, Bushby K, Muntoni F (2011) Exon skipping and dystrophin restoration in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy after systemic phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer treatment: an open-label, phase 2, dose-escalation study. Lancet 378(9791):595–605
Clements DN, Carter SD, Innes JF, Ollier WER, Day PJR (2007) Gene expression profiling of normal and ruptured canine anterior cruciate ligaments. Osteoarthr Cartil 16:195–203
Connuck DM, Sleeper LA, Colan SD, Cox GR, Towbin JA, Lowe AM, Wilkinson JD, Orav EJ, Cuniberti L, Salbert BA, Lipshultz SE (2008) Characteristics and outcomes of cardiomyopathy in children with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy: A comparative study from the Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry. Am Heart J 15:998–1005
Cooper BJ, Winand WN, Stedman H, Valentine BA, Hoffman EP, Kunkel LM, Scott M-O, Fischbeck KH, Kornegay JN, Avery RJ, Williams JR, Schmickel RD, Sylvester JE (1988) The homologue of the Duchenne locus is defective in X-linked muscular dystrophy of dogs. Nature 334:154–156
Corti S, Strazzer S, Del Bo R, Salani S, Bossolasco P, Fortunato F, Locatelli F, Soligo D, Moggio M, Ciscato P, Prelle A, Borsotti C, Bresolin N, Scarlato G, Comi GP (2002) A subpopulation of murine bone marrow cells fully differentiates along the myogenic pathway and participates in muscle repair in the mdx dystrophic mouse. Exp Cell Res 277:74–85
Cowan J, Macdessi J, Start A, Morgan G (1980) Incidence of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. J Med Genet 17:245–249
Cox GR, Kunkel LM (1997) Dystrophies and heart disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 12:329–343
Cozzi F, Cerletti M, Luvoni GC, Lombardo R, Brambilla PG, Faverzani S, Blasevich F, Cornelio F, Pozza O, Mora M (2001) Development of muscle pathology in canine X-linked muscular dystrophy. II. Quantitative characterization of histopathological progression during postnatal skeletal muscle development. Acta Neuropathol 101:469–478
Cros D, Harnden P, Pellissier JF, Serratrice G (1989) Muscle hypertrophy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. A pathological and morphometric study. J Neurol 236:43–47
De Angelis L, Berghella L, Coletta M, Lattanzi L, Zanchi M, Cusella-De Angelis MG, Ponzetto C, Cossu G (1999) Skeletal myogenic progenitors originating from embryonic dorsal aorta coexpress endothelial and myogenic markers and contribute to postnatal muscle growth and regeneration. J Cell Biol 147:869–878
de Lima AR, Nyengaard JR, Jorge AAL, Balieiro JCC, Peixoto C, Fioretto ET, Ambrόsio CE, Miglino MA, Zatz M, Ribeiro AACM (2007) Muscular dystrophy-related quantitative and chemical changes in adenohypophysis GH-cells in golden retrievers. Growth Horm IGF Res 2007:489–491
Dell’Agnola C, Want Z, Storb R, Tapscott SJ, Kuhr CS, Hauschka SD, Lee RS, Sale GE, Zellmer E, Gisburne S, Bogan J, Kornegay JN, Cooper BJ, Gooley TA, Little M-T (2004) Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation does not restore dystrophin expression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy dogs. Blood 104:4311–4318
Dent KM, Dunn DM, von Niederhausern AC, Aoyagi AT, Kerr L, Bromberg MB, Hart KJ, Tuohy T, White S, den Dunnen JT, Weiss RB, Flanigan KM (2005) Improved molecular diagnosis of dystrophinopathies in an unselected clinical cohort. Am J Med Genet A 134:295–298
Desmedt JE, Borenstein S (1976) Regeneration in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Electromyographic evidence. Arch Neurol 33:642–650
Devaux JY, Cabane L, Esler M, Flaouters H, Duboc D (1993) Non-invasive evaluation of the cardiac function in golden retriever dogs by radionuclide angiography. Neuromuscul Disord 3:429–432
Edwards RH, Jones DA, Newham DJ, Chapman SJ (1984) Role of mechanical damage in the pathogenesis of proximal myopathy in man. Lancet 1:548–552
Emeryk-Szajewska B, Kopeć J (2008) Electromyographic pattern in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy. Part I: Electromyographic pattern in subsequent stages of muscle lesion in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 48:265–277
Engel AG, Ozawa E (2004) Dystrophinopathies. In: Engel AG, Franzini-Armstrong C (eds) Myology. McGraw-Hill, Basic and Clinical. New York, pp 961–1025
Fan Y, Maley M, Beilharz M, Grounds M (1996) Rapid death of injected myoblasts in myoblast transfer therapy. Muscle Nerve 19:853–860
Fan Z, Kocis K, Valley R, Howard JF, Chopra M, An H, Lin W, Muenzer J, Powers W (2011) Safety and feasibility of high-pressure transvenous limb perfusion with 0.9% saline in human muscular dystrophy. Mol Ther. doi:10.1038/mt.2011.137
Ferlini A, Sewry C, Melis MA, Mateddu A, Muntoni F (1999) X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy and the dystrophin gene. Neuromuscul Disord 9:339–346
Fine DM, Shin J-H, Yue Y, Volkmann D, Leach SB, Smith BF, McIntosh M, Duan D (2011) Age-matched comparison reveals early electrocardiography and echocardiography changes in dystrophin-deficient dogs. Neuromusc Disord 21(7):453–461
Flanigan KM, Dunn DM, von Niederhausern A, Soltanzadeh P, Gappmaier E, Howard MT, Sampson JB, Mendell JR, Wall C, King WM, Pestronk A, Florence JM, Connolly AM, Mathews KD, Stephan CM, Laubenthal KS, Wong BL, Morehart PJ, Meyer A, Finkel RS, Bonnemann CG, Medne L, Day JW, Dalton JC, Margolis MK, Hinton VJ (2009) Mutational spectrum of DMD mutations in dystrophinopathy patients: application of modern diagnostic techniques to a large cohort. Hum Mutat 30:1657–1666
Gillis JM (1999) Understanding dystrophinopathies: an inventory of the structural and functional consequences of the absence of dystrophin in muscles of the mdx mouse. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 20:605–625
Gilbert R, Nalbantoglu J, Howell JM, Davies L, Fletcher S, Amalfitano A, Petrof BJ, Kamen A, Massie B, Karpati G (2001) Dystrophin expression in muscle following gene transfer with a fully deleted ("gutted") adenovirus is markedly improved by trans-acting adenoviral gene products. Hum Gene Ther 12:1741–1755
Goyenvalle A, Seto JT, Davies KE, Chamberlain J (2011) Therapeutic approaches to muscular dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet 20(R1):R69–R78
Griggs RC, Moxley RT 3rd, Mendell JR, Fenichel GM, Dr. Brooke MH, Miller PJ, Mandel S, Florence J, Schierbecker J, Kaiser KK, King W, Pandya S, Robison J, Signore L (1990) Randomized, double-blind trial of maziindol in Duchenne dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 13:1169–1173
Gussoni E, Blau HM, Kunkel LM (1997) The fate of individual myoblasts after transplantation into muscles of DMD patients. Nat Med 3:970–977
Haslett JN, Sanoudou D, Kho AT, Han M, Bennett RR, Kohane KS, Beggs AH, Kunkel LM (2003) Gene expression profiling of Duchenne muscular dystrophy skeletal muscle. Neurogenetics 4:163–171
Hilton-Brown P, Stålberg E, Trontelj J, Mihelin M (1985) Causes of the increased fiber density in muscular dystrophies studied with single fiber EMG during electrical stimulation. Muscle Nerve 8:383–388
Hoffman EP, Brown RH, Kunkel LM (1987) Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell 51:919–928
Holloway SM, Wilcox DE, Wilcox A, Dean JCS, Berg JN, Goudie DR, Denvir MA, Porteous MEM (2008) Life expectancy and death from cardiomyopathy amongst carriers of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy in Scotland. Heart 94:633–636
Holzwarth JA, Middleton RP, Roberts M, Mansourian R, Raymond F, Hannah SS (2005) The development of a high-density canine microarray. J Hered 96:817–820
Hoogerwaard EM, van der Wouw PA, Wilde AAM, Bakker E, Ippel PF, Oosterwijk JC, Majoor-Krakauer DF, van Essen AJ, Leschot NJ, de Visser M (1999) Cardiac involvement in carriers of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord 9:347–351
Hopkins AL, Howard JF, Wheeler SJ, Kornegay JN (1993) Stimulated single fibre electromyography in normal dogs. J Small Anim Pract 34:271–276
Howell JM, Fletcher S, O’Hara A, Johnsen RD, Lloyd F, Kakulas BA (1998a) Direct dystrophin and reporter gene transfer into dog muscle in vivo. Muscle Nerve 21:159–165
Howell JM, Lochmuller H, O’Hara A, Fletcher S, Kakulas BA, Massie B, Nalbantoglu J, Karpati G (1998b) High-level dystrophin expression after adenovirus mediated dystrophin minigene transfer to skeletal muscle of dystrophic dogs: prolongation of expression with imunosuppression. Hum Gene Ther 9:629–634
Ito H, Vilquin JT, Skuk D, Roy B, Goulet M, Lille S, Dugré FJ, Asselin I, Roy R, Fardeau M, Tremblay JP (1998) Myoblast transplantation in non-dystrophic dog. Neuromuscul Disord 8:95–110
Jaegger G, Marcellin-Little DJ, Levine D (2002) Reliability of goniometry in Labrador retrievers. Am J Vet Res 63:979–986
Jefferies JL, Eidem BW, Belmont JW, Craigen WJ, Ware SM, Fernback SD, Neish SR, Smith EO, Towbin JA (2005) Genetic predictors and remodeling of dilated cardiomyopathy in muscular dystrophy. Circulation 112:2799–2804
Jones BR, Brennan S, Mooney CT, Callahan JJ, McAllister H, Guo LT, Martin PT, Engvall E, Shelton GD (2004) Muscular dystrophy with truncated dystrophin in a family of Japanese Spitz dogs. J Neurol Sci 217:143–149
Karpati G, Ajdukovic D, Arnold D, Gledhill RB, Guttmann R, Holland P, Koch PA, Shoubridge E, Spence D, Vanasse M, Watters GV, Abrahamowicz M, Duff C, Worton RG (1993) Myoblast transfer in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann Neurol 34:8–17
Kellman P, Hernando D, Shah S, Hoyt RF Jr., Kotin R, Keene BW, Kornegay JN, Aletras AH, Arai AE (2009) Myocardial fibro-fatty infiltration in duchenne muscular dystrophy canine model detected using multi-echo Dixon method of water and fat separation imaging. In: ISMRM 2009. http://dir.nhlbi.nih.gov/staffpages/kellmanp/abstracts/ISMRM2009_03762.pdf
Kerkis I, Ambrόsio CE, Kerkis A, Martins DS, Zucconi E, Fonseca SAS, Cabral RM, Maranduba CMC, Gaiad TP, Morini AC, Vieira NM, Brolio MP, Sant’ Anna OA, Miglino MA, Zatz M (2008) Early transplantation of human immature dental pulp stem cells from baby teeth to golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) dogs: Local or systemic? J Transl Med 6:35
Knowler C, Wheeler SJ (1995) Neospora caninum infection in three dogs. J Small Anim Pract 36:172–177
Kobayashi M, Nakamura A, Hasegawa D, Fujita M, Orima H, Takeda S (2009) Evaluation of dystrophic dog pathology by fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging. Muscle Nerve 40:815–826
Koh GY, Soonpaa MH, Klug MG, Pride HP, Cooper BJ, Zipes DP, Field LJ (1995) Stable fetal cardiomyocyte grafts in the hearts of dystrophic mice and dogs. J Clin Invest 96:2034–2042
Kornegay JN, Tuler SM, Miller DM, Levesque DC (1988) Muscular dystrophy in a litter of golden retriever dogs. Muscle Nerve 11:1056–1064
Kornegay JN, Prattis SM, Bogan DJ, Sharp NJH, Bartlett RJ, Alameddine HS, Dykstra MJ (1992) Results of myoblast transplantation in a canine model of muscle injury. In: Kakulas BA, Howell JMc, Roses AD (eds) Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Animal Models and Genetic Manipulation. Raven Press, San Diego, pp 203–212
Kornegay JN, Sharp NJ, Bogan DJ, Van Camp SD, Metcalf JR, Schueler RO (1994a) Contraction tension and kinetics of the peroneus longus muscle in golden retriever muscular dystrophy. J Neurol Sci 123:100–107
Kornegay JN, Sharp NJ, Schueler RO, Betts CW (1994b) Tibiotarsal joint contracture in dogs with golden retriever muscular dystrophy. Lab Anim Sci 44:331–333
Kornegay JN, Bogan DJ, Bogan JR, Childers MK, Cundiff DD, Petroski GF, Schueler RO (1999) Contraction force generated by tibiotarsal joint flexion and extension in dogs with golden retriever muscular dystrophy. J Neurol Sci 166:115–121
Kornegay JN, Cundiff DD, Bogan DJ, Bogan JR, Okamura CS (2003) The cranial sartorius muscle undergoes true hypertrophy in dogs with golden retriever muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord 13:493–500
Kornegay JN, Li J, Bogan JR, Bogan DJ, Chen C, Zheng H, Wang B, Qiao C, Howard JF Jr, Xiao X (2010) Widespread muscle expression of an AAV9 human mini-dystrophin vector after intravenous injection in neonatal dystrophin-deficient dogs. Mol Ther 18:1501–1508
Kornegay JN, Bogan JR, Bogan DJ, Childers MK, Grange RW (2011) Golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD): Developing and maintaining a colony and physiological functional measurements. In: Duan D (ed) Muscle Gene Therapy: Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 709. Humana Press, New York, pp 105–123
Lamminen AE (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging of primary skeletal muscle diseases: patterns of distribution and severity of involvement. Br J Radiol 63:946–950
Lanfossi M, Cozzi F, Bugini D, Colombo S, Scarpa P, Morandi L, Galbiati S, Cornelio F, Pozza O, Mora M (1999) Development of muscle pathology in canine X-linked muscular dystrophy. I. Delayed postnatal maturation of affected and normal muscle as revealed by myosin isoform analysis and utrophin expression. Acta Neuropathol 97:127–138
Lee SJ (2004) Regulation of muscle mass by myostatin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20:61–86
Lee SJ, McPherron AC (1999) Myostatin and the control of skeletal muscle mass. Curr Opin Genet Dev 9:604–607
Li J, Bogan J, Chen C, Bogan D, Wang B, Yuan Z, Qiao C, Kornegay JN, Xiao X (2009) Hydrodynamic limb vein injection of AAV9 results in regional and systemic long-term expression of minidystrophin in young adult GRMD dogs. Mol Ther 17(S1):S278
Liu GC, Jong YJ, Chiang CH, Jaw TS (1993) Duchenne muscular dystrophy: MR grading system with functional correlation. Radiology 186:475–480
Liu JM, Okamura CS, Bogan DJ, Bogan JR, Childers MK, Kornegay JN (2004) Effects of prednisone in canine muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 30:767–773
Lovitt S, Moore SL, Marden FA (2006) The use of MRI in the evaluation of myopathy. Clin Neurophysiol 117:486–495
Malhotra S, Hart K, Klamut H, Thomas N, Bodrug S, Burghes A, Bobrow M, Harper P, Thompson M, Ray P, Worton R (1988) Frame-shift deletions in patients with Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy. Science 242:755–759
Marden FA, Connolly AM, Siegel MJ, Rubin DA (2005) Compositional analysis of muscle in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy using MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol 34:140–148
Marsh AP, Eggebeen JD, Kornegay JN, Markert CD, Childers MK (2010) Kinematics of gait in golden retriever muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord 20:16–20
McDonald CM, Henricson EK, Han JJ, Abresch RT, Nicorici A, Elfring GL, Atkinson L, Reha A, Hirawat S, Miller LL (2010) The 6-minute walk test as a new outcome measure in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 41:500–510
McPherron AC, Lee SJ (2002) Suppression of body fat accumulation in myostatin-deficient mice. J Clin Invest 109:595–601
McPherron AC, Lawler AM, Lee SJ (1997) Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-β superfamily member. Nature 387:83–90
Melacini P, Fanin M, Danieli GA, Villanova C, Martinello F, Miorin M, Freda MP, Mioreelli M, Mostacciuolo ML, Fasoli G, Angelini C, Volta SD (1996) Myocardial involvement is very frequent among patients affected with subclinical Becker’s muscular dystrophy. Circulation 94:3168–3175
Mendell JR, Campbell K, Rodino-Klapac L, Sahenk Z, Shilling C, Lewis S, Bowles D, Gray S, Li C, Galloway G, Malik V, Coley B, Clark KR, Li J, Xiao X, Samulski J, McPhee SW, Samulski RJ, Walker CM (2010) Dystrophin immunity in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. N Engl J Med 363:1429–1437
Meola G (2005) Advanced microscopic and histochemical techniques: diagnostic tools in the molecular era of myology. Eur J Histochem 49:93–96
Miller RG, Sharma KR, Pavlath GK, Gussoni E, Mynhier M, Yu P, Lanctot AM, Greco CM, Steinman L, Blau H (1997) Myoblast transplantation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: The San Francisco Study. Muscle Nerve 20:469–478
Minasi MG, Riminucci M, De Angelis L, Borello U, Berarducci B, Innocenzi A, Caprioli A, Sirabella D, Baiocchi M, De Maria R, Boratto R, Jaffredo T, Broccoli V, Bianco P, Cossu G (2002) The meso-angioblast: a multipotent, self-renewing cell that originates from the dorsal aorta and differentiates into most mesodermal tissues. Development 129:2773–2783
Miyazato LG, Moraes JRE, Baretta DC, Kornegay JN (2011) Muscular dystrophy in dogs: Does the crossing of different breeds influence disease phenotype? Vet Pathol 48:655–662
Moens P, Baatsen PHWW, Maréchal G (1993) Increased susceptibility of EDL muscles from mdx mice to damage induced by contractions with stretch. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 14:446–451
Moise NS, Valentine BA, Brown CA, Erb HN, Beck KA, Cooper BJ, Gilmour RF (1991) Duchenne’s cardiomyopathy in a canine model: Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 17:812–820
Mosher DS, Quignon P, Bustamante CD, Sutter NB, Mellersh CS, Parker HG, Ostrander EA (2007) A mutation in the myostatin gene increases muscle mass and enhances racing performance in heterozygote dogs. PLoS Genet 3:779–786
Muntoni F (2003) Cardiomyopathy in muscular dystrophies. Curr Opin Neurol 16:577–583
Nagaraju K, Willmann R, TREAT-NMD Network and the Wellstone Muscular Dystrophy Cooperative Research Network (2009) Developing standard procedures for murine and canine efficacy studies of DMD therapeutics: report of two expert workshops on "Pre-clinical testing for Duchenne dystrophy": Washington DC, October 27th-28th 2007 and Zürich, June 30th-July 1st 2008. Neuromuscul Disord 19:502–506
Nakagaki K, Gebhard DH, Bogan DJ, Kornegay JN (1994a) A quantitative comparison of NCAM-positive muscle cells from normal and dystrophic dogs. Muscle Nerve 17(Suppl 1):S193
Nakagaki K, Gebhard DH, Bogan DJ, Kornegay JN (1994b) Selection of canine myogenic cells with panning. Muscle Nerve 17(Suppl 1):S260
Nandedkar SD, Barkhaus PE, Charles A (1995) Multi-motor unit action potential analysis (MMA). Muscle Nerve 10:1155–1166
Nguyen F, Cherel Y, Guigand L, Goubault-Leroux I, Wyers M (2002) Muscle lesions associated with dystrophin deficiency in neonatal golden retriever puppies. J Comp Pathol 126:100–108
Nicholson HL, Osmotherly PG, Smith BA, McGowan CM (2007) Determinants of passive hip range of motion in adult Greyhounds. Aust Vet J 85:217–221
Nigro G, Comi LI, Politano L, Limongelli FM, Nigro V, Rimini ML, Giugliano MAM, Petretta VR, Passamano L, Restucci B, Fattore L, Tebloev K, Comi L, De Luca F, Raia P, Esposito M (1995) Evaluation of the cardiomyopathy in Becker muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 18:283–291
Ohshima S, Shin J-H, Yuasa K, Nishiyama A, Kira J, Okada T, Takeda S (2009) Transduction efficiency and immune response associated with the administration of AAV8 vector into dog skeletal muscle. Mol Ther 17:73–80
Parker MH, Kuhr C, Tapscott SJ, Storb R (2008) Hematopoietic cell transplantation provides an immune-tolerant platform for myoblast transplantation in dystrophic dogs. Mol Ther 16:1340–1346
Partridge T (2002) Myoblast transplantation. Neuromuscul Disord 12(Suppl 1):S3–S6
Partridge TA, Grounds M, Sloper JC (1978) Evidence of fusion between host and donor myoblasts in skeletal muscle grafts. Nature 273:306–308
Partridge TA, Morgan JE, Coulton GR, Hoffman EP, Kunkel LM (1989) Conversion of mdx myofibres from dystrophin-negative to -positive by injection of normal myoblasts. Nature 337:176–179
Phillips BA, Cala LA, Thickbroom GW, Melsom A, Zilko PJ, Mastaglia FL (2001) Patterns of muscle involvement in inclusion body myositis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Muscle Nerve 24:1526–1534
Pichavant C, Chapdelaine P, Cerri DG, Dominique JC, Quenneville SP, Skuk D, Kornegay JN, Bizario JC, Xiao X, Tremblay JP (2010) Expression of dog microdystrophin in mouse and dog muscles by gene therapy. Mol Ther 18:1002–1009
Porter JD, Khanna S, Kaminski HJ, Rao JS, Merriam AP, Richmonds CR, Leahy P, Li J, Guo W, Andrade FH (2002) A chronic inflammatory response dominates the skeletal muscle molecular signature in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice. Hum Mol Genet 11:263–272
Prattis SM, Gebhart DH, Dickson G, Watt DJ, Kornegay JN (1993) Magnetic affinity cell sorting (MACS) separation and flow cytometric characterization of neural cell adhesion molecule-positive, cultured myogenic cells from normal and dystrophic dogs. Exp Cell Res 208:453–464
Prior TW, Bridgeman SJ (2005) Experience and strategy for the molecular testing of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Mol Diag 7:317–326
Qiao C, Li J, Zheng H, Bogan J, Li J, Yuan Z, Zhang C, Bogan D, Kornegay J, Xiao X (2009) Hydrodynamic limb vein injection of AAV8 canine myostatin propeptide gene in normal dogs enhances muscle growth. Hum Gene Ther 20:1–10
Rideau Y (1984) Treatment of orthopedic deformity during the ambulation stage of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. In: Serratrice G (ed) Neuromuscular Diseases. Raven Press, New York, pp 557–564
Rouger K, Larcher T, Dubreil L, Deschamps JY, Le Guiner C, Jouvion G, Delorme B, Lieubeau B, Carlus M, Fornasari B, Theret M, Orlando P, Ledevin M, Zuber C, Leroux I, Deleau S, Guigand L, Testault I, Le Rumeur E, Fiszman M, Chérel Y (2011) Systemic delivery of allogenic muscle stem (MuStem) cells Induces Long-Term Muscle repair and clinical efficacy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy dogs. Am J Pathol 179(5):2501–2518
Saito M, Kawai H, Akaike M, Adachi K, Nishida Y, Saito S (1996) Cardiac dysfunction with Becker muscular dystrophy. Am Heart J 132:642–647
Salimena MC, Lagrota-Candido J, Quírico-Santos T (2004) Gender dimorphism influences extracellular matrix expression and regeneration of muscular tissue in mdx dystrophic mice. Histochem Cell Biol 122:535–544
Sampaolesi M, Blot S, D’Antona G, Granger N, Tonlorenzi R, Innocenzi A, Mognol P, Thibaud JL, Galvez BG, Barthelemy I, Perani L, Mantero S, Guttinger M, Pansarasa O, Rinaldi C, Cusella De Angelis MG, Torrente Y, Bordingnon C, Bottinelli R, Cossu G (2006) Mesoangioblast stem cells ameliorate muscle function in dystrophic dogs. Nature 444:574–579
Sanders DB, Stalberg EV (1996) AAEM minimonogaph #25: Single-fiber electromyography. Muscle Nerve 19:1069–1083
Schatzberg SJ, Olby NJ, Breen M, Anderson LV, Langford CF, Dickens HF, Wilton SD, Zeiss CJ, Binns MM, Kornegay JN, Morris GE, Sharp NJ (1999) Molecular analysis of a spontaneous dystrophin “knockout” dog. Neuromuscul Disord 9:289–295
Selsby J, Pendrak K, Zadel M, Tian Z, Pham J, Carver T, Acosta P, Barton E, Sweeney HL (2010) Leupeptin-based inhibitors do not improve the mdx phenotype. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 299:R1192–R1201
Sharp NJ, Kornegay JN, Van Camp SD, Herbstreith MH, Secore SL, Kettle S, Hung WY, Constantinou CD, Dykstra MJ, Roses AD, Bartlett RJ (1991) An error in dystrophin mRNA processing in golden retriever muscular dystrophy, an animal homologue of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Genomics 13:115–121
Shimatsu Y, Katagiri K, Furuta T, Nakura M, Tanioka Y, Yuasa K, Tomohiro M, Kornegay JN, Nonaka I, Takeda S (2003) Canine X-linked muscular dystrophy in Japan (CXMDJ). Exp Anim 52:93–97
Shimatsu Y, Yoshimura M, Yuasa K, Urasawa N, Tomohiro M, Nakura M, Tanigawa M, Nakamura A, Takeda S (2005) Major clinical and histopathological characteristics of canine X-linked muscular dystrophy in Japan, CXMDJ. Acta Myol 24:145–154
Siegel IM, Miller JE, Ray RD (1968) Subcutaneous lower limb tenotomy in the treatment of pseudohypertrophic muscular dystrophy. J Bone Joint Surg 50A:1437–1443
Skuk D, Paradis M, Goulet M, Tremblay JP (2007) Ischemic central necrosis in pockets of transplanted myoblasts in nonhuman primates: implications for cell-transplantation strategies. Transplantation 84:1307–1315
Smith BF, Kornegay JN, Duan D (2007) Independent canine models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy due to intronic insertions of repetitive DNA. Mol Ther 15(Suppl 1):S51
Smith BF, Yue Y, Woods PR, Kornegay JN, Shin JH, Williams RR, Duan D (2011) An intronic LINE-1 element insertion in the dystrophin gene aborts dystrophin expression and results in Duchenne-like muscular dystrophy in the Corgi breed. Lab Invest 91:216–231
Smythe GM, Hodgetts SI, Grounds MD (2001) Problems and solutions in myoblast transfer therapy. J Cell Mol Med 5:33–47
Spencer MJ, Croall DE, Tidball JG (1995) Calpains are activated in necrotic fibers from mdx dystrophic mice. J Biol Chem 270:10909–10914
Tegeler CJ, Grange RW, Bogan DJ, Markert CD, Case D, Kornegay JN, Childers MK (2010) Eccentric contractions induce rapid isometric torque drop in dystrophic-deficient dogs. Muscle Nerve 42:130–132
Thibaud JL, Monnet A, Dertoldi D, Barthelemy I, Blot S, Carlier PG (2007) Characterization of dystrophic muscle in golden retriever muscular dystrophy dogs by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Neuromuscul Disord 17:575–584
Townsend D, Turner I, Yasuda S, Martindale J, Davis J, Shillingford M, Kornegay JN, Metzger JM (2010) Chronic administration of membrane sealant prevents severe cardiac injury and ventricular dilatation in dystrophic dogs. J Clin Invest 120:1050–1140
Tremblay JP, Malouin F, Roy R, Huard J, Bouchard JP, Satoh A, Richards CL (1993) Results of a triple blind clinical study of myoblast transplantations without immunosuppressive treatment in young boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cell Transplant 2:99–112
Valentine BA, Cooper BJ, de Lahunta A, O’Quinn R, Blue JT (1988) Canine X-linked muscular dystrophy. An animal model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: clinical studies. J Neurol Sci 88:69–81
Valentine BA, Cummings JF, Cooper BJ (1989a) Development of Duchenne-type cardiomyopathy. Morphologic studies in a canine model. Am J Pathol 135:671–678
Valentine BA, Kornegay JN, Cooper BJ (1989b) Clinical electromyography studies of canine X-linked muscular dystrophy. Am J Vet Res 50:2145–2147
Valentine BA, Cooper BJ, Cummings JF, de Lahunta A (1990) Canine X-linked muscular dystrophy: morphologic lesions. J Neurol Sci 97:1–23
Vieira NM, Valadares M, Zucconi E, Secco M, Bueno CR, Brandalise V, Assoni A, Gomes J, Landini V, Andrade T, Caetano HV, Vainzof M, Zatz M (2011) Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells injected systemically into GRMD dogs without immunosuppression are able to reach the host muscle and express human dystrophin. Cell Transplant 2011 Oct 14 [Epub ahead of print]
Vignos PJ Jr, Archibald KC (1960) Maintenance of ambulation in childhood muscular dystrophy. J Chron Dis 12:273–290
Vignos PJ Jr, Spencer GE Jr, Archibald JC (1963) Management of muscular dystrophy of childhood. JAMA 184:89–96
Wadosky KM, Li L, Rodríguez JE, Min J, Bogan D, Gonzalez J, Kornegay JN, Willis M (2011) Regulation of the calpain and ubiquitin proteasome systems in a canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 44(4):553–562
Wagner KR, McPherron AC, Winik N, Lee SJ (2002) Loss of myostatin attenuates severity of muscular dystrophy in mdx mice. Ann Neurol 52:832–836
Wagner KR, Liu X, Chang X, Allen RE (2005) Muscle regeneration in the prolonged absence of myostatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2519–2524
Walmsley GL, Arechavala-Gomeza V, Fernandez-Fuente M, Burke MM, Nagel N, Holder A, Stanley R, Chandler K, Marks SL, Muntoni F, Shelton GD, Piercy RJ (2010) A Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene hot spot mutation in dystrophin-deficient Cavalier King Charles spaniels is amenable to exon 51 skipping. PloS One 5(1):e8647
Wang Z, Allen JM, Riddell SR, Gregorevic P, Storb R, Tapscott SJ, Chamberlain JS, Kuhr CS (2007a) Immunity to adeno-associated virus-mediated gene transfer in a random-bred canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Hum Gene Ther 18:18–26
Wang Z, Kuhr CS, Allen JM, Blankenship M, Gregorevic P, Chamberlain JS, Tapscott SJ, Storb R (2007b) Sustained AAV-mediated dystrophin expression in a canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy with a brief course of immunosuppression. Mol Ther 15:1160–1166
Wang B, Li J, Fu FH, Xiao X (2009) Systemic human minidystrophin gene transfer improves functions and life span of dystrophin and dystrophin/utrophin-deficient mice. J Orthop Res 27:421–426
Wang Z, Storb R, Lee D, Kushmerick MJ, Chu B, Berger C, Arnett A, Allen J, Chamberlain JS, Riddell SR, Tapscott SJ (2010) Immune responses to AAV in canine muscle monitored by cellular assays and noninvasive imaging. Mol Ther 18:617–624
Wang J, Fan Z, Kornegay JN, Styner MA (2011) MRI-based quantification of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in a canine model. Proc SPIE 7965:0G1-9
Winand N, Pradham D, Cooper B (1994) Molecular characterization of severe Duchenne-type muscular dystrophy in a family of Rottwiler dogs. In: Molecular mechanism of neuromuscular disease. Muscular Dystrophy Association, Tucson
Winnard AV, KIein CJ, Coovert DD, Prior T, Papp A, Snyder P, Bulman DE, Ray PN, McAndrew P, King W, Moxley RT, Mendel JR, Burghes AHM (1993) Characterization of translational frame exception patients in Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet 2:737–744
Wulff K, Herrmann FH, Wapenaar MC, Wehner M (1989) Deletion screening in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Neurol 236:470–473
Yokota T, Lu QL, Partridge T, Kobayashi M, Nakamura A, Takeda S, Hoffman E (2009) Efficacy of systemic morpholino exon-skipping in Duchenne dystrophy dogs. Ann Neurol 65:667–676
Yuasa K, Yoshimura M, Urasawa N, Ohshima S, Howell JM, Nakamura A, Hijikata T, Miyagoe-Suzuki Y, Takeda S (2007) Injection of a recombinant AAV serotype 2 into canine skeletal muscles evokes strong immune responses against transgene products. Gene Ther 14:1249–1260
Yue Y, Ghosh A, Long C, Bostick B, Smith BF, Kornegay JN, Duan D (2008) A single intravenous injection of adeno-associated virus serotype-9 leads to whole body skeletal muscle transduction in dogs. Mol Ther 16:1944–1952
Yugeta N, Urasawa N, Fujii Y, Yoshimura M, Yuasa K, Wada MR, Nakura M, Shimatsu Y, Tomohiro M, Takahashi A, Machida N, Wakao Y, Nakaura A, Takeda S (2006) Cardiac involvement in Beagle-based canine x-linked muscular dystrophy in Japan (CXMDJ): electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and morphologic studies. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 6:47–59
Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, Gerig G (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31:1116–1128
Zatz M, Betti RT, Levy JA (1981) Benign Duchenne muscular dystrophy in a patient with growth hormone deficiency. Am J Med Genet 10:301–304
Zucconi E, Vieira NM, Bueno CR Jr, Secco M, Jazedje T, Costa Valadares M, Fussae Suzuki M, Bartolini P, Vainzof M, Zatz M (2011) Preclinical studies with umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells in different animal models for muscular dystrophy. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011:715251
Acknowledgments
These studies were supported by the following grants: AAV-Mediated Gene Therapy in Canine Muscular Dystrophy, Project 2, University of Pittsburgh Wellstone MDCRC (1U54AR50733; NIAMS) (Xiao); Gene Therapy in Golden Retriever Muscular Dystrophy Model, Project 2, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Wellstone MDCRC (5U54AR056953; NIAMS) (Xiao); the Co-operative Program in Translational Research: Proposal for Establishment of the National Center for Canine Models of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (NCDMD) (1U24NS059696-01A1; NINDS) (Kornegay); Natural History and Immunological Parameters in the German Shorthaired Pointer Muscular Dystrophy (GSHPMD) Dog, Translational Research Advisory Committee (TRAC) of the Muscular Dystrophy Association (Kornegay); F32 NRSA grant 1F32AR060703-01 (NIAMS) (Nghiem); and the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research Core (5R24HD050846; NCMRR) (Hoffman).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kornegay, J.N., Bogan, J.R., Bogan, D.J. et al. Canine models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and their use in therapeutic strategies. Mamm Genome 23, 85–108 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-011-9382-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-011-9382-y