Abstract
Ultrasound (US) of the paediatric chest has become an established imaging tool that may supplement plain film findings helping to reduce or tailor other ionizing (sectional) imaging in a variety of paediatric conditions such as sequestration or pneumonia. US has been shown to offer valuable imaging alternatives, both reliably enabling diagnosis without need for ionising imaging such as in diaphragmatic palsy (traditionally diagnosed by fluoroscopy) and revealing additional information in patients with equivocal findings on radiographs or replacing follow-up examinations (for example, in pleural effusion). This review outlines the technical requisites for paediatric chest US applications and will discuss its diagnostic potential. Furthermore, it will consider US restrictions, mention some rare applications, and discuss the potential role of chest US in imaging algorithms of certain conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Chest plain films still form the mainstay of paediatric chest imaging in most routine queries. However, there are instances where radiographs reveal equivocal information or are unable to define a diagnosis; furthermore, some conditions necessitate frequent follow-up investigations that may add up to a significant radiation burden, particularly considerable in infants and children with their increased radiation sensitivity.
Ultrasound (US) of the paediatric chest has become an established imaging tool that may supplement plain film findings helping to reduce other ionizing (sectional) imaging in a variety of paediatric conditions [1–12]. US has been shown to offer valuable imaging alternatives, both enabling diagnosis and additional information in equivocal findings on radiographs or even replacing follow-up examinations (for example in pleural effusions or diaphragmatic palsy).
This review briefly outlines the technical requisites for chest US applications and its diagnostic potential. It furthermore will discuss US restrictions, mention some rare applications, and discuss the potential role of chest US in imaging algorithms of certain conditions. Echocardiography, mediastinal, as well as (endoscopic) intra-operative chest US will not be included.
Equipment and requirements
Requirements depend on patient age, site of the pathology and sonographic access. For chest wall assessment as well as for US of the superficial pleural and lung space a high resolution linear transducer is recommended. Frequencies vary from 5 to 15 MHz. For intercostal access to deeper spaces a sector or vector array transducer proves helpful; again frequencies vary with age and depth of the focused pathology. For transabdominal access-using the liver, the fluid-filled stomach, or the spleen as a sonographic window to the diaphragm and basal chest spaces-sector and curved linear array transducers are helpful. A relatively high frame rate, harmonic imaging, and a crisp post-processing may also be helpful. Colour-Doppler sonography (CDS) is used for assessment of abscesses, space-occupying lesions, vascular pathology and sequestration. M-Mode may be helpful for assessment and documentation of diaphragmatic movement.
Additional to these technical requirements, the profound knowledge of potential paediatric and neonatal chest disease and its differential diagnosis is mandatory. In general US can be considered a supplement to plain film and should not be seen as the one and only primary imaging tool for chest queries; however, in many conditions the combination of US and plain film will reveal a definite diagnosis and most of the treatment-relevant information.
Diseases suitable for chest ultrasound
The following lists the most important paediatric chest US applications, including a description of typical features and discussion of the role of US in diagnostic imaging algorithms. Note that US is excellent for assessment of the thymus and thus is the first choice for assessment of a radiographically unclear widened mediastinum.
Pleural effusion
US is very sensitive in detecting particularly latero-dorsal and basal pleural effusions, even more sensitive than plain film for small amounts of fluid, and thus can be used for diagnosis and follow-up [1–7, 13–17]. US helps to differentiate locculated and/or echogenic (“complicated”) from clear and unseptated (“uncomplicated“) collections, and US is even more sensitive than CT for depicting septations within an effusion. These abilities may in conjunction with clinical information impact management (e.g., only follow-up without puncture in minimal uncomplicated reactive effusion, single drainage of an unseptated collection, or pigtail catheter placement in large complicated and potentially loculated empyema-very much also depening on local variations in treatment plans). Or US may reveal valuable information for deciding between various alternative treatment options (e.g., thoracoscopic intervention, open surgery, or image guided percutaneous drainage-potentially with additional instillation of fibrinolytic agents for breaking down of septae allowing a successful conservative treatment) (Fig. 1) [10, 11, 15–19]. However, note that US does not always allow for definite specification of the disease or differentiation of transudation versus exudate, haemorrhagic versus proteinous, reactive versus inflammatory, or cardiogenic versus chylous effusions.
Particularly for follow-up, a standardised patient and transducer position is recommended to allow for comparability of measurement (e.g., sitting, as thus the fluid collects in the lower thorax). Due to the complex geometry of effusions an accurate assessment of its volume is difficult. Particularly in large collections a transhepatic or transabdominal access may prove helpful, as well as extended field-of-view techniques. Finally, US offers a safe and reliable real-time guidance for interventions [2–7, 10, 11, 20–22]. It may help to define the best location for incision and drainage, allows for real-time control during the puncture and catheter placement, and offers post-interventional follow-up (Fig. 2).
Pulmonary processes
As soon as the air-filled lung or the air in the lung is replaced by fluid, consolidation, or by another non-aerated process, these areas become accessible to US, provided the process reaches the chest wall or the diaphragm. Thus US may help to differentiate various radiographically unspecific findings by revealing more information about the structure of the process, e.g., liquid or solid, with maintained lung anatomy or destruction, with or without perfusion alterations, etc. [1–13, 23–26]. Thus, US may help to avoid additional imaging. However, as soon as suspicion of a tumour arises, or US is unable to properly answer all treatment-relevant questions (e.g., preoperatively, only partial visualisation of the process, information on other lung areas essential, etc.), additional imaging by contrast-enhanced CT or MRI becomes mandatory.
Atelectasis
Atelectasis can be seen on US, as this process usually reaches the pleura. It may be due to compression or obstruction. US signs for atelectasis are no visible air or bronchi in the liver-like parenchyma (“hepatisation”) and a triangular shape with convex or straight margins. However, some residual undulating aeration may be observed during respiration in some cases, or bronchi may be filled with fluid (“fluid-bronchogram”) then only distinguishable from vessels by CDS. Note that US cannot reliably differentiate an atelectasis from (hypostatic or broncho-) pneumonia, and often dystelectasis is associated with severe pneumonia. (Peripheral) pulmonal infarctions are rare in the paediatric setting, though sometimes discovered unexpectedly; in these conditions CDS may help establishing the diagnosis applying the same diagnostic criteria as in adults [25].
Infectious conditions
The typical US image of pneumonia is a liver-like appearance of the parenchyma, often with some residual air in central echogenic bronchi that are accompanied by the vascular bundle creating linear echogenicities (= “air-bronchogram”) (Fig. 3) [26]. One may find flow in the pulmonary vessels; using duplex-Doppler sonography trace analysis a differentiation of pulmonary artery brunches, pulmonary veins and bronchial arteries becomes feasible, helping to differntiate pneumonia from infarction or necrosis (Fig. 4a). Complications within inflammatory processes lead to disruption of the lung anatomy as well as regional perfusion defects; these criteria help to sonographically demonstrate abscess formation (Fig. 4b). Once an abscess is located, US may offer a safe guide for puncture and drainage. Particularly when US matches clinical findings US and chest film may suffice for diagnosis, and cross-sectional imaging may be avoided.
Congenital pulmonal malformations
With the advances in foetal sonography many thoracic foregut malformations are detected prenatally. They all need postnatal assessment, confirmation and follow-up, particularly as we only start learning about the natural course of some of these conditions. As many of these may regress spontaneously early imaging is helpful. Ultrasound can be used for imaging all lesions that are solid and/or liquid and reach the chest wall or the diaphragm. The major findings with more or less typical US features are:
-
sequestrations usually are echogenic and homogenous masses with sharp borders; often CDS can identify a large vessel (Fig. 5) [1–4, 8, 11, 27–35]. The feeding artery usually arises from the aorta and should be identified by meticulous scanning, whereas the draining vein either may drain to the systemic or to the pulmonary circulation-this is more difficult to differentiate on sonography; sometimes the shape of the duplex trace can help differentiate the two venous systems. Note that (extra-lobar) sequestration can be found that are also juxta- or even infra-diaphragmatic. Sometimes cysts may be present, then indicating a hybrid lesions (of CCAM and sequestration).
-
Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation (CCAM) can be macro-cystic, micro-cystic, or a mixture of medium size cysts with solid aspects; the respective histology defines the US appearance (Fig. 6) [2–4, 8, 11, 36–39].
-
Bronchial cysts are only visible on US as long as they are fluid filled; if they have a connection with the bronchial tree, they may exhibit fluid air levels [37–39]. When the fluid is absorbed, an air-filled cyst remains, then becoming inaccessible by US.
Cysts, tumours/neoplasms, and other thoracic masses
Thoracic masses are usually depicted by plain film; US may help to differentiate the nature of the mass. Though cystic chest lesions and potential tumours may be assessed sonographically, differentiation of the various entities cannot regularly be achieved. Only indirect signs may hint towards the diagnosis, such as:
-
a clear cyst, particularly in a neonate or infant, will probably represent a bronchial, pleural, or pericardial cyst or a CCAM [2–4, 8, 11, 36–39]. In older children other entities that may be more difficult to differentiate by US such as hydatide disease or (postinfectious/posttraumatic) encapsulated effusions must be considered [40].
-
A cyst with irregular walls and nodular soft tissue components may hint towards pulmoblastoma or teratoma, particularly if calcifications are present. (Fig. 7).
-
a soft tissue mass with regional compression and small punctuate calcifications may indicate a neuroblastoma.
-
An echogenic mass in a neonate or infant with a (large) artery deriving from the systemic circulation will represent a sequestration [1–4, 8, 11, 27–35].
-
Central cysts with multi-layered walls that resemble bowel wall may indicate oesophageal duplications or diaphragmatic hernia.
However, as soon as the suspicion of a tumour arises, if US is unable to properly answer all relevant questions, or for differential diagnosis additional imaging by contrast-enhanced CT or MRI will be mandatory for further assessment, staging, and surgery planning. However, in children thoracic tumours or (particularly pleural) metastasis are rare, and therefore US of these masses is less important than in adults. If visible sonographically US may offer image guidance for biopsies.
Other typical paediatric chest masses are often mediastinal, such as lymphoma, oesophageal duplication, thoracic neuroblastoma, mediastinal teratoma, ventral meningocele, and thymus tumours-however, the discussion of these entities is beyond the scope of this review. The same applies to cardiac masses or pericardial effusions and cysts.
Diaphragmatic conditions
The most common query that can best be answered by US is diaphragmatic palsy or relaxation. Ultrasound as a real-time investigation can nicely visualise diaphragmatic movement during breathing, and US can compare both sides. Documentation is difficult if video-clips cannot be archived. Motion(m)-mode improves documentation of (disturbed) motion, and the m-mode trace allows a semi-quantitative assessment, not only for comparison of both sides, but also during follow-up [41–47] (Fig. 8).
The echogenic structure cranial to the liver (and spleen) represents the air-filled lungs; the diaphragm itself can usually not be seen unless there is pleural fluid adjacent to the thoracic border of the diaphragm. Then the diaphragmatic muscle can be seen as a hypoechoic layer over the liver and the spleen. Diaphragmatic hernias can thus only be visualised if abdominal content herniated through the gap and displaces the lung, or with pleural effusions. US works perfectly for diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia on foetal US (no air in the lungs or bowel) and can be used in neonates as well, particularly if there is only little abdominal gas that interferes with sonographic access [2–4, 11, 48, 49] (Fig. 9). Small gaps without herniation of major structures, however, can be missed, such as diaphragmatic lacerations in a posttraumatic setting. Hiatus hernia or intrathoracic position of the stomach can only be seen when the stomach is filled with tea that allows manifestation of herniation (during filling) and delineation of these structures, provided sufficient sonographic access [50–52]. Thus, US may find and demonstrate such a hernia or even the rare intrathoracic kidney, but is unreliable in ruling out particularly small or intermittent diaphragmatic herniation.
Chest wall applications
Sometimes, visible or palpable chest wall complaints may lead to a focussed US investigation of the suspected area. Using high-frequency linear transducers the superficial structures are readily accessible to US. As soft tissues and non-ossified parts of the ribs are better seen sonographically than on radiographs (and often even CT), US represents the primary modality in imaging these conditions [2–4, 8, 53].
One condition in the neonate may be a swollen breast (Fig. 10a). Here US may help to delineate not only physiological changes during breast feeding caused by maternal hormones, such as (asymmetrically) prominent breast tissue or ectatic cyst-like ducts, but may also help to diagnose abscess formations, cysts or haematomas, the latter being more common in older girls after trauma. Furthermore, US is used in the assessment of other paediatric breast masses such as gynaecomastia [10, 11, 53–58].
Another typical clinical query is a chest wall lump, as clinically the differentiation between a deep haematoma, a lymph node, a tumourous lesion or a rib anomaly may be difficult. US enables depiction of rib variations, demonstrating the cartilaginous fused parts of ribs or cartilaginous exostoses [53]. It may also show periostal changes or subperiostal haematoma after injury sometimes even in radiographically occult fractures, particularly in the early posttraumatic setting. Ultrasound may demonstrate haemangiomas or cystic lymphangioma, often with intermittent haemorrhage into some compartments creating a conglomerate of mixed simple and complicated cysts (Fig. 10b). Only small vessels are incidentally visible within the septae on CDS. Although US accurately demonstrates lymphangiomas, additional imaging (MRI) may become indicated for visualisation of the entire extend, particularly if there is suspicion of deep or mediastinal involvement. Rare other chest wall tumours such as Askin tumour or osteosarcoma may be seen by US that demonstrates the destructive nature of the tumour and its relation to the partially destroyed rib; however, these conditions always require further (sectional) imaging, both for assessment of the local status as well as for staging.
Discussion
Ultrasound primarily is used for assessment of chest wall abnormalities and for further evaluation of equivocal radiographic findings, usually opacities. Typical scenarios are the opaque (hemi)thorax, pleural effusions, and focal chest opacities-provided they reach the chest wall or the diaphragm for sonographic access (Fig. 11). In some conditions US offers a reliable follow-up method, such as in pleural effusions or prenatally diagnosed foregut malformations. And US is an established portable imaging tool for “FAST” and effective assessment of trauma patients for potential pleural and pericardial collections during evaluation and stabilisation at the emergency room. Finally US can be used as an image guidance for various interventional procedures, mostly punctures and drainages of fluid collections or abscesses, but also (less frequent) for guiding biopsies. With this considerable potential of paediatric chest US and particularly if mediastinal pathologies are additionally included in the definition “paediatric chest ultrasound”, US today should play a major role in paediatric chest imaging.
Some other reported applications are less commonly used in children, partially because these entities are more common in adults (e.g., pleural metastases, peripheral infarction). Other reported applications are not generally accepted or not widely used, e.g., US for diagnoses and follow-up in neonatal hyaline membrane syndrome [59]. Ultrasound may depict pneumothorax using indirect signs such as lack of or inverted movement of the echogenic air-tissue border; however, even if recognised sonographically, this condition usually requires plain film or CT [60].
Other restrictions of US have to be considered: US relies on access via non-calcified and non-aerated tissue to the area of interest, which is restricted particularly in diffuse or central lung problems; thus US is poor in ruling out certain conditions. Ultrasound cannot conspicuously demonstrate a panoramic overview; thus location and assessment of the entire extend of various conditions may be difficult or insufficient, and follow-up may suffer from errors caused by different access and planes. US is relatively investigator dependent; proper equipment as well as training and experience are most important to grant a reliable US diagnosis and useful imaging documentation necessary for communication with clinicians and parents as well as for further treatment decisions and follow-up comparison. An US examination may be time consuming; it usually takes longer to meticulously assess the entire pathology on US than performing a radiograph and/or a chest CT. Furthermore, availability of experienced US for these queries is restricted, as sick children do not adhere to routine working hours and many conditions are presented at night, where dedicated paediatric US is unavailable. All this leads to a rather reluctant use of US in paediatric chest queries not corresponding well with the large US potential.
In conclusion
I want to summarise that US has great potential in many paediatric chest queries. Ultrasound is not invasive, doesn’t use ionising radiation or contrast media, it does not require sedation or anaesthesia, and can readily be applied at the bedside. It can easily be repeated and may offer additional functional information difficult to retrieve by conventional sectional imaging or plain films. All these features should recommend US as a useful additional imaging tool, supplementing radiographs and helping to tailor further sectional imaging if necessary. To ensure diagnostically valuable US, adequate equipment and availability of trained staff should be promoted in order to grant reliable access to this valuable modality for infants and children. With this approach US will become a valued and indispensable additional imaging tool that hopefully will achieve growing acceptance and realistic reimbursement, and thus eventually may find its established role in the imaging algorithm of many paediatric chest conditions.
References
Blickman JG (1994) Paediatric radiology: the requisits-chest. Mosby, St. Louis-Baltimore-Boston-Chicago-London-Madrid-Philadelphia-Sidney-Toronto, pp 3–56
Coley BD (2005) Pediatric chest ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am 43:405–418
Durand C, Garel C, Nugues F, Baudain P (2001) Sonography of thoracic diseases in children. J Radiol 82:729–237
Feldkamp A (2005) Thoraxsonographie. In: Hofmann V, Deeg KH, Hoyer PF (eds) Ultraschalldiagnostik in Pädiatrie und Kinderchirurgie, 3rd edn. Thieme. Stuttgard-New York, pp 221–234
Glasier CM, Leithiser RE, Williamson SL, Seibert JJ (1989) Extracardiac chest ultrasonography in infants and children: radiographic and clinical implications. J Pediatr 114:540–544
Haller JO (1980) Diagnostic ultrasound for chest diseases in children. Pediatr Annal 9:187–191
Lobo ML (2006) The neonatal chest. Europ J Radiol 60:152–158
Mathis G (1997) Thorax sonography - Part I: Chest wall and pleura. Ultrasound Med Biol 23:1131–1139
May DA, Booth RA, YXeager S (1993) Perinatal and postnatal chest sonography. Radiol Clin North Am 31:449–515
Riccabona M (2000) Thorax. Checkliste Ultraschall in der Pädiatrie und Kinderchirurgie. Thieme, Stuttgard - New York, pp 113–117
Riccabona M (2003) Thoraxsonographie im Neugeborenen- und Kindesalter [Thoracic sonography in infancy and childhood] Radiologe 43:1075–1089
Siegel MJ (1995) Pediatric sonography-chest. Raven Press, New York, pp 91–114
Barnes NP, Hull J, Thomson AH (2005). Medical management of parapneumonic pleural disease. Pediatric Pulmonology 39:127–134
Doski JJ, Lou D, Hicks BA, Megison SM, Sanchez P, Contidor M, Guzzetta PC Jr (2000) Management of parapneumonic collections in infants and children. Pediatr Surg 35:265–268; discussion 269–270
Ekingen G, Guvenc BH, Sozubir S, Tuzlaci A, Senel U (2004) Fibrinolytic treatment of complicated pediatric thoracic empyemas with intrapleural streptokinase. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:503–507
Gofrit ON, Engelhard D, Abu-Dalu K (1999) Post-pneumonic thoracic empyema in children: a continued surgical challenge. Europ J Pediatr Surg 9:4–7
Lin CH, Huang YC, Chiu CH, Huang CG, Tsao KC, Lin TY (2006) Echo-guided management of complicated parapneumonic effusion in children. Paediatr Pulmonol 41:1226–1232
Gates RL, Hogan M, Weinstein S, Arca MJ (2004) Drainage, fibrinolytics, or surgery: a comparison of treatment options in pediatric empyema. J Pedaitr Surg 39:1638–1642
Koplewitz BZ, Ramos C, Manson DE, Babyn PS, Ein SH (2000) Traumatic diaphragmatic injuries in infants and children: imaging findings. Pediatr Radiol 30:471–479
Pinotti KF, Ribeiro SM, Cataneo AJ (2006) Thorax ultrasound in the management of pediatric pneumonias complicated with empyema. Pediatr Surg Int 22:775–778
Ghaye B, Dondelinger RF (2001) Imaging guided thoracic interventions. Eur Respir J 17:507–528
Mynarek G, Brabrand K, Jakobsen JA, Kolbenstvedt A (2004) Complications following ultrasound-guided thoracocentesis. Acta Radiol 45:519–522
Gorg C, Bert T, Kring R, Dempfle A (2006) Transcutaneous contrast enhanced sonography of the chest for evaluation of pleural based pulmonary lesions: experience in 137 patients. Ultraschall Med 27:437–444
Mathis G, Metzler J, Fußenegger D, Feurstein M, Sutterlütti G (1992) Ultraschallbefunde bei Pneumonie. Ultraschall Klin Prax 7:45–49
Mathis G, Blank W, Reissig A, Lechleitner P, Reuss J, Schuler A, Beckh S (2005) Thoracic ultrasound for diagnosing pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicenter study of 352 patients. Chest 128:1531–1538
Weinberg B, Diakoumakis EE, Kass EG, Seife B, Zvi ZB (1986) The air-bronchogram: sonographic demonstration. Am J Roentgenol 147:593–595
Benya EC, Bulas DI, Selby DM, Rosenbaum KN (1993) Cystic sonographic appearance of extralobar pulmonary sequestration. Pedaitr Radiol 23:603–607
Deeg KH, Hofbeck M, Singer H (1992) Diagnosis of intralobar sequestration by colour-coded Doppler sonography. Eur J Pediatr 151:286–295
Felker RE, Tonkin ILD (1990) Imaging of pulmonary sequestration. Am J Roentgenol 154:241–249
Jaffe MH, Bank ER, Silver TM, Bowerman RA (1982) Pulmonary sequestration: ultrasonic appearance. J Clin Ultrasound 10:294–296
Kaude JV, Laurin S (1984) Ultrasonographic demonstration of systemic artery feeding extrapulmonary sequestration. Pediatr Radiol 14:226–227
Newman B (1990) Real-time ultrasound and color-Doppler imaging in pulmonary sequestration. Pediatrics 86:620–623
Samuel M, Burge DM (1999) Management of antenatally diagnosed pulmonary sequestration associated with congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation. Thorax 54:701–706
Schlessinger AE, DiPietro MA, Statte MB (1994) Utility of sonography in the diagnosis of pulmonary sequestration. J Pediatr Surg 29:52–55
Smart LM, Hendry CMA (1991) Imaging of neonatal pulmonary sequestration including Doppler ultrasound. Brit J Radiol 64:324–329
Hartenberg MA, Brewer WH (1983) Cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung: identification by sonography. Am J Roentgenol 140:693–694
Hendry PJ, Hendry GMA (1988) Ultrasonic diagnosis of a bronchogenic cyst in a child with persistent stridor. Pediatr Radiol 18:338
Ries T, Currarino G, Nikaidoh H, Kennedy L (1982) Real-time ultrasonography of subcarinal bronchogenic cysts in two children. Radiology 145:121–122
Williams HJ, Johnson KJ (2002) Imaging of congenital cystic lung lesions. Paediatr Respir Rev 3:120–127
Ulku R, Eren N, Cakir O, Balci A, Onat S (2004) Extrapulmonary intrathoracic hydatid cysts. Can J Surg 47:95–98
Ambler R, Gruenewald S, John E (1985). Ultrasound monitoring of diaphragm activity in bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis. Arch Dis Child 60:170–172
Arena F, Romeo C, Calabro MP, Antonuccio P, Arena S, Romeo G (2005). Long-term functional evaluation of diaphragmatic motility after repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 40:1078–1081
Epelman M, Navarro OM, Daneman A, Miller FS (2005) M-mode sonography of diaphragmatic motion: description of technique and experience in 278 pediatric patients. Pediatr Radiol 35:661–667
Helzel MV, Grunze M (1985) Quantitative determination of diaphragmatic motility using ultrasound. Comparison with pulmonary function test parameters and thoracic radiography. Röntgenblätter 38:248–252
Laing IA, Teele RL, Stark AR (1988) Diaphragmatic movement in newborn infants. J Pediatr 112:638–643
Riccabona M, Sorrantin E, Fotter R (1998) Application of functional m-mode sonography in pediatric patients. Eur Radiol 8:1457–1461
Urvoas E, Pariente D, Fausser C, Lipsich J, Taleb R, Devictor D (1994) Diaphragmatic paralysis in children: diagnosis by TM-mode ultrasound. Pediatr Radiol 24:564–568
Gross BR, D’Augostina C, Coren CV, Petrikovsky BP (1996) Prenatal and neonatal sonographic imaging of central diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Radiol 26:395–397
Ng CP, Lo CB, Chung CH (2004) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia masquerading as pneumonia. Emergency Med Australasia 16:167–169
Riccabona M, Maurer U, Lackner H, Uray E, Ring E (1992) The role of sonography in the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux - correlation to pH-metry. Eur J Paediatr 151:655–657
Sumner TE, Volberg FM, Smolen PM (1982) Intrathoracic kidney- diagnosis by ultrasound. Pediatr Radiol 12:78–80
Westra SJ, Wolf BH, Staalman CR (1990) Ultrasound diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux and hiatal hernia in infants and young children. J Clin Ultrasound 18:477–485
Glass RBJ, Norton KI, Mitre SA, Kang E (2002) Pediatric ribs: a spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics 22:87–104
Boothroyd A, Carty H (1994) Breast masses in childhood and adolescence. A presentation of 17 cases and a review of the literature. Pediatr Radiol 24:81–84
Ciftci AO, Tanyel FC, Buyukpamukcu N, Hicsonmez A (1998) Female breast masses during childhood: a 25-year review. Eur J Pediatr Surg 8:67–70
Kronemer KA, Rhee K, Siegel MJ, Sievert L, Hildebolt CF (2001) Gray scale sonography of breast masses in adolescent girls. J Ultrasound Med 20:491–496
Templeman C, Hertweck SP (2000) Breast disorders in the pediatric and adolescent patient. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 27:19–34
Welch ST, Babcock DS, Ballard ET (2004) Sonography of pediatric male breast masses: gynecomastia and beyond. Pedaitr Radiol 34:952–957
Avni EF, Braude P, Pardou A, Matos C (1990) Hyaline membrane disease in the newborn: diagnosis by ultrasound. Pediatr Radiol 20:143–146
Dulchavsky SA, Schwarz KL, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. (2001) Prospective evaluation of thoracic ultrasound in the detection of pneumothorax. J Trauma 50:201–205
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riccabona, M. Ultrasound of the chest in children (mediastinum excluded). Eur Radiol 18, 390–399 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0754-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0754-3