Abstract
Multislice computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been found feasible for the evaluation of visceral vasculature. The development of multislice technology has overcome past limitations. First, the faster scanning speed increases volume coverage during a single breath-hold and improves the exploitation of contrast medium. Second, the better spatial resolution results in nearly isotropic voxels allowing reconstruction of high-resolution three-dimensional images with different algorithms. Volume rendering is capable of displaying the visceral vasculature from any external vantage point. Compared to conventional angiography, CTA not only delineates vessels but also depicts the anatomical relationship to adjacent structures and allows the evaluation of perfused organs. CTA also has become an emerging tool for the pre- and postinterventional assessment of vascular anatomy. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to present a spectrum of visceral vascular diseases and interventional and surgical therapies, and to highlight the role of postprocessing for their evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a valuable minimally invasive tool for the visualization of visceral vasculature [1, 2]. When compared to conventional angiography, CTA is less expensive, saves examination time, and may save iodinated contrast dose and radiation exposure of the patient [3, 4]. Moreover, CTA allows innumerable arbitrary projections and is not limited to a single opacification. The introduction of 16-row multislice computed tomography (MSCT) has overcome most of the limitations of earlier scanner generations. With regard to faster scanning speed and improved spatial resolution, MSCT enables an increase in scan volume during a single breath-hold with a sub-millimeter resolution. Compared to 4-row or 8-row MSCT, the improved temporal resolution of 16-row MSCT ameliorates the contrast bolus exploitation and therefore decreases the opacification of overlaying veins. The high z-plane resolution results in nearly isotropic voxels, allowing high-quality postprocessing algorithms. Multiplanar reformatted projections (MPR) are able to display the axial data sets in any desired oblique or curved plane. Another valuable algorithm is maximum intensity projection (MIP), which provides angiography-like displays. The volume rendering (VR) technique makes use of the entire data set, thus giving an overview and may convey more information than MPR and MIP. It can show multiple internal and overlying features, and the flexibility of the VR algorithm allows the protocol to be tailored to the actual clinical problem, but when improperly used has the potential hazard of loss of valuable information. Parameters such as brightness, opacity, window and level can be interactively modified, for example to better visualize small vessels at high opacity or to make organs more transparent at decreased opacity allowing the evaluation of intraparenchymal vasculature [5].
Imaging technique
CTA of the abdominal and pelvic vasculature was performed on a 16-row MSCT system (Sensation 16, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). After administration of 120 ml non-ionic intravenous contrast agent (Visipaque, Amersham Health, Little Chalfont, UK) at an injection rate of 3.0 ml/s and bolus tracking in the abdominal aorta, the CT scan was performed from the diaphragm to the pubic symphysis. The scanning parameters were: collimation 16×0.75 mm, table feed 12 mm/rotation, tube potential 100 kV and tube current 225 mA. Oral contrast agent is not routinely administered because opacified bowel would disturb postprocessing and segmentation of mesenteric vessels. We routinely perform dual phase imaging to allow both arterial and venous patency to be evaluated as well as the pattern of bowel wall and parenchyma enhancement to be defined. Axial images were reconstructed using a medium soft kernel (B30f). MPR, MIP, and VR images were routinely generated using a radiological workstation (Leonardo, Siemens Medical Solutions). For reconstruction of MPR and MIP a mean time of approximately 10 min was needed, whereas for reconstructing VR images between 15 and 30 min was required depending on the desired image quality and anatomical complexity of the individual case. Approximately 120 patients were examined with this protocol between December 2003 and June 2004. The estimated mean radiation dose delivered to the patients was 10 mSv.
Discussion
Acute mesenteric ischemia
Acute mesenteric ischemia may be caused by occlusions of arteries or veins (Figs. 1, 2, 3), as well as by nonocclusive reduction of intestinal perfusion (Fig. 4) [6, 7]. Rare causes of acute intestinal ischemia include spontaneous dissection of mesenteric vessels or dissection of the abdominal aorta [8]. Previous studies have shown CTA to be highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of bowel ischemia by demonstrating arterial or venous thrombosis and alterations of bowel indicating ischemia [8–10]. Typical changes include bowel dilatation (small bowel >3 cm, large bowel >6 cm) and wall thickening, abnormal or absent bowel wall enhancement, intramural hemorrhage, intestinal pneumatosis, and focal or diffuse intraperitoneal fluid collections [11]. Evaluation of the mesenteric vasculature by CTA may sometimes enable the underlying cause, such as atherosclerotic plaques, thrombus or occlusion, to be detected. Alterations of the bowel and the main vessels can usually be evaluated on axial images, while VR images offer the advantage of allowing the evaluation of mesenteric vessels from the origin to the distal branches on a single projection.
Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is commonly caused by decreased cardiac output resulting in splanchnic hypoperfusion. Typical angiographic signs for the diagnosis of NOMI include narrowing and vasoconstriction of multiple branches of the superior mesenteric artery, alternate dilatation and narrowing of intestinal branches, spasms of mesenteric arcades, impaired filling or occlusion of intramural vessels, reflux of contrast into the abdominal aorta, and spread out segmental arteries due to distention of bowel loops [7]. Some of these findings are difficult to depict on CTA. In addition, because the therapy of patients with NOMI consists of selective vasodilator infusion [12], some authors have proposed that a first-line conventional angiography be performed instead of CTA.
Segmental mediolytic arteriopathy
Segmental mediolytic arteriopathy (SMA) was first described in 1976 by Slavin and Gonzalez-Vitale [13]. It is characterized by a noninflammatory arteriopathy causing medial lysis of adult visceral arteries. Typical CT findings consist of thickening and dissection of the artery wall, multiple aneurysms of small vessels, and retroperitoneal bleeding (Fig. 5) [14]. Arterial wall thickening and dissection can be clearly demonstrated on MPR or MIP, while the extent of saccular aneurysms is better delineated using the VR technique owing to the complex small vessel anatomy of the typically affected arteries. Because of its rarity, no reliable information about the optimal therapeutic option is available. Surgical or interventional repair of aneurysms and endovascular stenting of arterial dissections may be necessary. Because of the similarity of SMA to polyarteritis nodosa, surgery with histopathological analysis for better differentiation has been proposed [15].
Pre- and postinterventional and postsurgical imaging
In emergency abdominal vascular disease, CTA provides the single most effective imaging tool [14]. In contrast to conventional angiography, CTA is not only able to detect the pathological vascular condition but also its effects on organs by delineating parenchymal perfusion [5]. In addition, CTA can help the surgeon or interventional radiologist plan treatment, for example by allowing the occluded vessel’s diameter to be measured or the communication points for stent graft placement to be defined [16]. Due to these advantages and the wide availability of CT, CTA with two- and three-dimensional reconstructions is increasingly becoming the initial and single imaging method for planning surgical or angiographic interventions [14].
Postsurgical evaluation of vascular anatomy is often complex and can only hardly be appreciated on axial images alone. Therefore postprocessing modalities, and in particular the VR technique, can be extremely helpful in understanding the extra-anatomical course of the postoperative mesenteric vessels (Figs. 3, 6, 7, 8).
Conclusion
Multislice CTA is an excellent tool to assess a wide variety of abdominal vascular diseases and offers a noninvasive imaging method for pre- and postinterventional evaluation of mesenteric perfusion.
The VR technique in particular provides images of high quality with excellent visualization of pathological conditions and their anatomical relationship with adjacent structures, that often cannot be confidently assessed by axial CT images alone.
CTA allows the success or failure of vascular intervention to be determined and is consequently the preferred imaging modality for both pre- and postinterventional planning and follow-up studies.
References
Prokop M (1998) CT angiography of the abdominal arteries. Abdom Imaging 23:462–468
Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Hofmann LK, Das M, Flohr T, Ohnesorge BM, Baumert B, Rolnick J, Allen JM, Raptopoulos V (2003) Multislice CT angiography. Eur Radiol 13:1946–1961
Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Schmidt AJ, Fleischmann D, Logan L, Leung AN, Jeffrey RB, Napel S (1999) Computed tomographic angiography: historical perspective and new state-of-the-art using multi detector-row helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23 [Suppl 1]:S83–S90
Kalra MK, Maher MM, Saini S (2003) Multislice CT: update on radiation and screening. Eur Radiol 13:M129–M133
Johnson PT, Heath DG, Bliss DF, Cabral B, Fishman EK (1996) Three-dimensional CT: real-time interactive volume rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:581–583
McKinsey JF, Gewertz BL (1997) Acute mesenteric ischemia. Surg Clin North Am 77:307–318
Trompeter M, Brazda T, Remy CT, Vestring T, Reimer P (2002) Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia: etiology, diagnosis, and interventional therapy. Eur Radiol 12:1179–1187
Fleischmann D (2003) MDCT of renal and mesenteric vessels. Eur Radiol 13:M94–M101
Taourel PG, Deneuville M, Pradel JA, Regent D, Bruel JM (1996) Acute mesenteric ischemia: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 199:632–636
Kirkpatrick ID, Kroeker MA, Greenberg HM (2003) Biphasic CT with mesenteric CT angiography in the evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia: initial experience. Radiology 229:91–98
Lee R, Tung HK, Tung PH, Cheung SC, Chan FL (2003) CT in acute mesenteric ischaemia. Clin Radiol 58:279–287
Ernst S, Luther B, Zimmermann N, Bohner H, Wilke R, Feindt P, Furst G (2003) Current diagnosis and therapy of non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (in German). Rofo 175:515–523
Slavin RE, Gonzalez-Vitale JC (1976) Segmental mediolytic arteritis: a clinical pathologic study. Lab Invest 35:23–29
Frauenfelder T, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Boehm T (2004) Nontraumatic emergent abdominal vascular conditions: advantages of multi-detector row CT and three-dimensional imaging. Radiographics 24:481–496
Chan RJ, Goodman TA, Aretz TH, Lie JT (1998) Segmental mediolytic arteriopathy of the splenic and hepatic arteries mimicking systemic necrotizing vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum 41:935–938
Piccoli G, Gasparini D, Smania S, Sponza M, Marzio A, Vit A, Bazzocchi M (2003) Multislice CT angiography in the assessment of peripheral aneurysms. Radiol Med (Torino) 106:504–511
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Center of Competence in Research, Computer Aided and Image Guided Medical Interventions of the Swiss National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wildermuth, S., Leschka, S., Alkadhi, H. et al. Multislice CT in the pre- and postinterventional evaluation of mesenteric perfusion. Eur Radiol 15, 1203–1210 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2654-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2654-8