Key message
Here we report the enhancement of tolerance to salt stress in Brassica rapa (Chinese cabbage) through the RNAi-mediated reduction of GIGANTEA ( GI ) expression.
Abstract
Circadian clocks integrate environmental signals with internal cues to coordinate diverse physiological outputs. The GIGANTEA (GI) gene was first discovered due to its important contribution to photoperiodic flowering and has since been shown to be a critical component of the plant circadian clock and to contribute to multiple environmental stress responses. We show that the GI gene in Brassica rapa (BrGI) is similar to Arabidopsis GI in terms of both expression pattern and function. BrGI functionally rescued the late-flowering phenotype of the Arabidopsis gi-201 loss-of-function mutant. RNAi-mediated suppression of GI expression in Arabidopsis Col-0 and in the Chinese cabbage, B. rapa DH03, increased tolerance to salt stress. Our results demonstrate that the molecular functions of GI described in Arabidopsis are conserved in B. rapa and suggest that manipulation of gene expression through RNAi and transgenic overexpression could enhance tolerance to abiotic stresses and thus improve agricultural crop production.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
All eukaryotic and some prokaryotic species have circadian clocks. These circadian clocks have an endogenous periodicity of ~24 h and allow the organism to anticipate the daily transitions of dawn and dusk and consequently to coordinate its physiology temporally with the surrounding environment (Sanchez et al. 2011; Gehan et al. 2015). Plant circadian clocks are entrained to the environment, with daily cycles of light and temperature providing the strongest resetting cues (Salomé and McClung 2005). Identification of the molecular components of the circadian clock of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana has revealed the basic workings of the plant circadian clock. The circadian clock consists of positive and negative elements that comprise a transcriptional-translational feedback loop (Bell-Pedersen et al. 2005; Sanchez et al. 2011). In higher plants, this system consists of multiple interlocked feedback loops (Harmer 2009). Also, post-transcriptional (e.g., alternative splicing and mRNA stability) (Staiger and Brown 2013; Romanowski and Yanovsky 2015) and post-translational processes (e.g., reversible phosphorylation, protein stability, and nucleocytoplasmic localization) are essential to correct clock function (Kim et al. 2013a, c; Hsu and Harmer. 2014).
The plant circadian clock gates many responses to environmental stimuli (Gehan et al. 2015). For example, the circadian clock regulates phytochrome gene expression and thus modulates its own sensitivity to light. Similarly, the responses to abiotic and biotic stimuli are a function of the time of day. For example, circadian-regulated gene sets overlap with ABA-regulated gene sets; ABA plays central roles in many environmental stress responses, including water use and responses to drought (Matsui et al. 2008; Mizuno and Yamashino 2008). The expression of TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1 (TOC1), a member of the core oscillator, is induced by ABA and implicated in plant responses to drought by controlling stomatal aperture through the circadian clock (Legnaioli et al. 2009). Similarly, the circadian clock modulates the cold acclimation response to freezing temperatures (Fowler et al. 2005; Mikkelsen and Thomashow 2009; Dong et al. 2011). Alternative splicing of the Arabidopsis thaliana core clock gene CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1) has been suggested to link the clock with cold acclimation (Seo et al. 2012). Recently, the circadian clock component GIGANTEA (GI) was demonstrated to play a key function in salt tolerance through the control of the SALT OVERLY SENSITIVE (SOS) pathway (Kim et al. 2013b; Qiu et al. 2003). GI interacts with the SOS2 kinase to prevent activation of the SOS1 plasma membrane-resident Na+/H+ antiporter in the absence of salt stress. However, under saline conditions, SOS2, released by proteolytic degradation of GI, can interact with the SOS3 sodium ion sensor, which activates SOS1 to establish salt tolerance (Kim et al. 2013b). GI overexpression increases salt sensitivity, whereas loss of GI function enhances salt tolerance (Kim et al. 2013b; Xie et al. 2015). These and other studies indicate that a circadian clock synchronized with the environment enhances fitness through elevated stress resistance as well as via enhanced photosynthetic capacity and carbohydrate metabolism (Dodd et al. 2005; Graf and Smith 2011; Sanchez et al. 2011).
The polyploid species Brassica rapa includes a variety of vegetable crops, such as Chinese cabbage, bokchoy, turnip, and broccoletto, as well as oilseed crops, such as turnip rape and sarson. Many of these varieties are agriculturally important worldwide. Among Brassica crops, B. rapa has been used as a model species (Mun et al. 2009). Comparative mapping of Arabidopsis and Brassica species has revealed considerable synteny (Parkin et al. 2005; Schranz et al. 2006), which facilitated identification of B. rapa homologs of Arabidopsis clock components (Kim et al. 2012; Lou et al. 2012). Here we identify and clone a GI homolog from the B. rapa Chinese cabbage genome and investigate its role in salt tolerance of this vegetable crop. We generated transgenic B. rapa DH03 RNAi suppressor lines that exhibited reduced expression of GI, resulting in enhanced salt tolerance.
Materials and methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
The Arabidopsis thaliana lines used were from the Col-0 background. Seeds were plated on MS medium and incubated at 4 °C for 3 days and then transferred to a growth chamber at 22 °C under LD conditions (16 h light/8 h dark). After the seeds had germinated, seedlings were transplanted into soil. The B. rapa ssp. pekinensis inbred lines ‘Chiifu’ and DH03 (Kim et al. 2007a) were used in this study. Plants were grown in a controlled environment growth chamber under LD or SD conditions (8 h light/16 h dark) at 22 °C with cool-white fluorescent illumination (150 µmol m−2 s−1, FLR40D/A fluorescent tubes, Osram, Korea).
Isolation and phylogenetic analysis of BrGI
A bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone containing the ortholog of GI was identified (http://www.brassica-rapa.org), and the GI structure and sequence were predicted using the web-based gene prediction software FGENE-SH Arabidopsis (http://www.softberry.com/berry.phtml). Primers were designed based on the predicted GI orthologous region using the Primer3 software (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/). A full-length BrGI cDNA sequence, consisting of 3552 bp, was amplified from total RNA using BrGI-specific primers. The PCR fragments were subcloned into the pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and sequenced using the ABI 3730 DNA Sequencer. Details of the primers used are listed in Supplement Table 1. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the predicted amino acid sequences of BrGI (HQ615940.1), GI (NM_102124.2), Populus trichocarpa (PtGI; XM_002307480.1), Triticum aestivum (TaGI1; AF543844.1), Hordeum vulgare (HvGI; AY740524.1), Ricinus communis (RcGI; XM_002524295.1), Ipomoea nil (InGI; AB265781.1), Allium cepa (AcGIa; GQ232756.1), Allium cepa (A cGIb; GQ232757.1), and Oryza sativa (OsGI; NM_001048755.1). A phylogenetic tree was generated using the neighbor-joining method in the MEGA software, version 4.0 (Kumar et al. 2004). The significance of the phylogenetic lineages was assessed by bootstrap analysis with 500 replicates and expressed as percentages. A multiple sequence alignment was performed using the ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1994) and GeneDoc (http://iubio.bio.indiana.edu/soft/molbio/ibmpc/genedoc-readme.html) software.
Analysis of BrGI expression
Total RNA was isolated from leaf tissue using RNeasy Plant Mini Kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA synthesis was performed using EcoDry™ Premix (Oligo dT) (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Takara Bio, Mountain View, CA, USA). For cDNA synthesis, 5 μg total RNA was incubated with oligo(dT) primers at 42 °C for 60 min, followed by 70 °C for 10 min. To assess BrGI expression under LD and SD conditions, tissues were collected every 3 h for 24 h under light/dark conditions and for 72 h under continuous light, and expression was analyzed by qRT-PCR. The qRT-PCR reaction was performed in three technical replicates using a Bio-Rad system and the SYBR Green I master mix in a volume of 20 μl. To determine BrGI expression in transformants of Arabidopsis and Brassica, synthesized cDNA and 10 pmol each of the left and right primers were then amplified in PCR mixtures subjected to denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, amplification for 36 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The relative expression level of each target gene was determined by calculating the ratio of the target gene intensity to that of the β-ACTIN gene (Hong et al. 2008; Bactin5′, 5′-TGGCATCACACTTTCTACAA-3′; and Bactin3′, 5′-CAACGGAATCTCTCAGCTCC-3′) from the same cDNA preparation.
Yeast two-hybrid screening and β-galactosidase activity assays
Protein–protein interaction assays were performed using the ProQuest™ Two-Hybrid System with Gateway® Technology (Invitrogen™, CA, USA). The yeast strain used was MaV203 (MATα, trp1, leu2, his3). The vectors used were pDEST™32 (GAL4 DNA Binding Domain containing Gateway® Destination Vector; BD, bait) and pDEST™22 (GAL4 Activation Domain containing Gateway® Destination Vector; AD, Prey). cDNAs encoding the proteins were PCR-amplified using gene-specific primer sets (Table S1), and the PCR products were subcloned into the GAL4 AD- or BD-encoding vector using the gateway technique. The bait and prey pairs were cotransformed into the yeast strain MaV203. β-galactosidase activity was determined using o-nitrophenyl-b-D-galactopyranoside as the substrate. The gene sequences were fused to a DNA sequence encoding the activation domain of GAL4 in the pDEST™22 vector. The plasmids were co-transformed into cells of the MaV203 yeast strain along with the pDEST™32-BrGI plasmid containing BrGI fused in-frame to the sequence encoding the binding domain of GAL4. A pDEST™32-GI plasmid was generated and analyzed for comparison.
Construction of plant expression vectors
To express BrGI in Arabidopsis, BrGI was inserted into the pB2GW7 binary vector together with the herbicide-resistance gene (bar; Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology, http://www.psb.rug.ac.be/gateway) as a selectable maker using Gateway Technology (Invitrogen, https://www.invitrogen.com). To knockdown expression of BrGI, we developed the 10 BrGI_RNAi vectors from the pB7GWIWG2(II) binary vector, each targeting a distinct region of BrGI (Fig. 3a; Table S1).
Generation of transgenic plants
Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 and gi-201 (Martin-Tryon et al. 2007) were transformed with the BrGI constructs; flowers were sprayed with a suspension of A. tumefaciens GV3101 carrying the appropriate construct in 5 % sucrose. The plants were then incubated in a growth chamber at 25 °C and 100 % humidity for 1 day and transferred to a growth chamber under a 16-h photoperiod at 23 °C. Transformants were selected by application of Basta (0.3 % solution). Primary transformants were self-fertilized and homozygous lines were identified. All experiments used seed from homozygous T4 lines.
The Chinese cabbage DH03 transformation procedure was similar to the method of Kim et al. (2007a). Surface-sterilized seeds were placed on MSO medium (MS basal medium + 3 % sucrose + 0.8 % Phytagar) and incubated in a culture room under LD conditions at 25 °C for 6–7 days. Hypocotyls were cut into 0.5 cm segments and placed on pre-culture medium (MS basal medium + 1 mg/l NAA + 3 mg/l BA + 2 mg/l AgNO3 + 3 % sucrose + 0.8 % Phytagar). The pre-cultured hypocotyls were inoculated with Agrobacterium suspension in MS liquid medium for 15–20 min. The inoculated hypocotyls were then placed on co-cultivation medium (MS basal medium + 1 mg/l NAA + 3 mg/l BA + 3 % sucrose + 0.8 % Phytagar) and incubated for 3 days in darkness at 25 °C. To remove Agrobacterium, the explants were washed three to five times in liquid cocultivation medium supplemented with 100 mg/l carbenicillin and 250 mg/l cefotaxime and transferred to selective medium
(MS basal medium + 1 mg/l NAA + 3 mg/l BA + 2 mg/l AgNO3 + 10 mg/l hygromycin + 3 % sucrose + 100 mg/l carbenicillin + 250 mg/l cefotaxime + 0.8 % Phytagar). Calli that formed on the hypocotyls were subcultured on fresh selective medium, which was replaced every 2–3 weeks until the shoots regenerated. The regenerated shoots were transferred to MSO medium to induce root formation. The transformed plants were grown in a glasshouse after acclimatization.
Salt stress
Arabidopsis thaliana transformants were sown on basal medium (½ strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) salts amended with 2 % sucrose and solidified with 1 % agar) and transplanted to soil after germination. Plants were grown under LD conditions at 23 °C for 2 weeks. To examine tolerance to salt, 250 mM NaCl solution was supplied every 3 days for 2 weeks. We evaluated the salt resistance of B. rapa RNAi transformants in several ways. To examine effects at the germination stage, seeds were sown on ½ MS salts, 2 % sucrose, and 1 % agar with or without 150 mM NaCl and root elongation was assessed after 14 days. For hydroponic cultures, seeds were sown in sponge cubes and supplemented with nutrient solution (Lee et al. 2012) for 2 weeks. When two to three true leaves had developed, the nutrient solution was replaced with fresh solution with or without 150 mM NaCl every 2 days for 2 weeks. Finally, 1-week-old seedlings grown on MS medium were transferred to fresh MS medium amended with 0, 200, or 300 mM NaCl. After 1 week, the photosynthetic capacity (Fv/Fm) was measured using a FluorCam 800MF chamber (Photon system instruments, Czech Republic), and the chlorophyll contents of whole seedlings were determined (Ritchie 2006). Data were analyzed via Student’s t test or by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test.
Protein immunoblotting
GI protein abundance in B rapa lines carrying different BrGI alleles was analyzed by Western blotting of protein extracts prepared from 2-week-old plants probed with a rabbit polyclonal antibody prepared against native GI. An HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and chemiluminescent substrate were used for detection. Arabidopsis wild-type plants (Col-0) harvested at ZT1 and ZT13 and 35S::GI-HA (a constitutive GI overexpre ssion line) were used as GI protein controls (Kim et al. 2007c, 2013b).
Results
Isolation of the B. rapa GI gene
As the initial step in evaluating the role of GI in salt tolerance of Brassica rapa, an ortholog of GI was identified and isolated from the Chinese cabbage B. rapa DH03. Using a comparative genomics approach (Kim et al. 2007b), we first identified a GI cDNA from B. rapa (BrGI) that was orthologous to the GI gene from Arabidopsis thaliana (GI). The putative GI cDNA sequence (GenBank accession no. HQ615940) and its encoded amino acid sequence were compared with those of known dicot and monocot GI genes available in the GenBank DNA sequence database. The coding sequence of BrGI showed 87 % nucleotide sequence identity to that of GI. BrGI encodes 1183 amino acids (Fig. S1a) and consists of 13 exons and 12 introns (Fig. S1b). The size and structure of BrGI were similar to those of GI. Southern blot hybridization using a probe specific to BrGI revealed a single BrGI gene in the B. rapa DH03 genome (data not shown), consistent with the reference B. rapa Chiifu genomic sequence (Wang et al. 2011). Multiple sequence alignments using the GI proteins from dicot and monocot plants showed that the BrGI protein is highly conserved (Table S2). The BrGI protein is most similar to GI, with a sequence identity of 91 %, and is more closely related to dicot GI proteins than to monocot GI proteins (Fig. S1c).
Circadian clock regulation of BrGI expression
In Arabidopsis, GI transcript abundance is regulated by the circadian clock (Fowler et al. 1999; Park et al. 1999). In B. rapa, many orthologs of circadian clock genes of Arabidopsis exhibit daily rhythmic changes in expression (Kim et al. 2012). We, therefore, expected that BrGI expression would be under the control of the circadian clock. To examine this hypothesis, B. rapa seedlings were collected in triplicate every 3 h over a 24-h period comprising a long (LD; 16 h light/8 h dark) or short day (SD; 8 h light/16 h dark), and BrGI transcript levels were analyzed by quantitative RT–PCR (qRT-PCR). Sampling times were expressed as zeitgeber time (ZT), which is the number of hours after the onset of illumination (Zerr et al. 1990). We found that the BrGI transcript levels cycled under both light regimens (Fig. 1a, b). Under LD conditions, the transcript level was lowest at dawn (ZT0) and peaked at 9 h after dawn (ZT9). A similar pattern was observed under SD conditions, but the peak was reached at ZT6. BrGI transcript levels decreased rapidly in the evening. These oscillation patterns are similar to those of GI expression in Arabidopsis (Fowler et al. 1999; Park et al. 1999) and Brachypodium distachyon (Hong et al. 2010), which peaked at ZT12 and ZT8 under LD and SD conditions, respectively. This pattern was also similar to that of BrGI transcripts in the R500 and IMB211 B. rapa accessions, which peaked at ZT8 under a 12/12 h photoperiod (Xie et al. 2015). To determine if the rhythmic cycling of the BrGI transcript was under the control of the circadian clock, B. rapa plants entrained under either LD or SD conditions were transferred to continuous light conditions. The BrGI transcript levels continued to cycle with oscillation patterns similar to those observed under LD or SD conditions (Fig. 1c, d), indicating that BrGI mRNA abundance is regulated by the circadian clock.
BrGI is similar in function to Arabidopsis GI
The GI protein interacts with a variety of proteins related to circadian rhythm, light responses, and photoperiodic flowering (Kim et al. 2007c, 2013b). A series of yeast two-hybrid assays were carried out to determine whether BrGI also interacts with the GI-interacting partners AtCOP1, ZTL, FKF1, and LKP2 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Both GI and BrGI interacted with each of the other proteins examined (Fig. 2a, b). We found that the BrGI protein physically interacts with the GI-interacting partners related to circadian clock regulation. In addition to the circadian expression of the BrGI gene (Fig. 1), these observations further suggest that the BrGI protein is under the control of the circadian clock and is functionally similar to Arabidopsis GI. To examine the hypothesis that BrGI is similar in function to GI, we transformed the Arabidopsis gi-201 null mutant, which exhibits extremely late flowering under LD conditions, with the BrGI gene under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter. The flowering phenotypes of homozygous transgenic plants were compared with that of the parental gi-201 mutant. The resultant transgenic plants (35S::BrGI in gi-201) flowered earlier than did the gi-201 mutant (Fig. 2c). These results demonstrate that the BrGI gene rescued the GI loss-of-function mutant in terms of flowering time.
Effect of reduced GI expression on Arabidopsis plants
In Arabidopsis, GI contributes to the flowering and abiotic stress response pathways (Fowler et al. 1999; Edwards et al. 2011; Xie et al. 2015). We generated eight BrGI-RNAi constructs (Fig. 3a) and transformed them into Arabidopsis Col-0 to assess their functionality. Semi-quantitative PCR and qRT-PCR established that each of the RNAi lines showed reduced GI expression relative to expression in Col-0 (Fig. 3b, c). However, flowering time was not delayed relative to that in Col-0, suggesting that the reduction in GI expression was insufficient to delay flowering. In contrast, several RNAi lines (GK5, GK7, and GK8) were more tolerant to NaCl stress than was Col-0 and exhibited similar salt tolerance to those of the gi-201 null mutants (Fig. 3d).
Reduced expression of BrGI increases the tolerance to salt stress of transgenic Chinese cabbage
To evaluate the effect of BrGI expression in B. rapa, we transformed all of the BrGI-RNAi constructs into the B. rapa accession DH03, a Chinese cabbage. Using a tissue culture approach we obtained several transformants harboring the GK1 and GK4 RNAi constructs. BASTA-resistant transgenic plants regenerated from callus cultures were self-pollinated to obtain homozygous seeds, which were assessed for tolerance to salt stress. These transgenic plants could germinate and grow in the presence of 75 and 125 mM NaCl but failed to grow at 250 mM NaCl (Fig. S2). We further characterized four lines (GK1_11, GK-_12, GK4_4, and GK4_6) that showed stable tolerance to salt stress. Reduced GI expression resulted in increased root growth in the presence of 150 mM NaCl (Fig. 4a), supporting the increased tolerance to salt of our GI RNAi lines of B. rapa. Most transformants showed decreased BrGI mRNA levels compared with non-transgenic plants (Fig. 4b). We evaluated the effect of RNAi knockdown of GI mRNA on GI protein abundance; GI protein levels were reduced to a greater extent in GK1_11 and GK1_12 than in GK4_4 (Figs. 4c, S3). When 2-week-old hydroponically grown seedlings were exposed to 150 mM NaCl for 1 week, non-transformed GI wild-type plants withered, but most GI knockdown transformants survived. Thus the reduced BrGI expression enhanced the ability of the plants to survive after 1 week of exposure to high (150 mM) NaCl (Fig. 5a). Both GK4 lines, which retained greater GI expression than that of the GK1 lines, showed increased interveinal chlorosis (Figs. 5b, S4). In GI-knockdown RNAi lines, chlorosis was less severe than that in the wild-type, DH03 (Fig. 6a). The tolerance of each genotype to salt was quantified in terms of fresh weight, chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence. Each metric was expressed as the ratio of the value in salt-stressed seedlings to that in unstressed seedlings. As a positive control, we showed that a loss-of-function gi-1 mutant obtained by TILLING in B. rapa R-o-18 increased salt tolerance, as determined by photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) (Fig. 6b), consistent with the results of Xie et al. (2015). In response to salt stress, fresh weight and photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) were significantly greater in the GK1-11 and GK1-12 lines than in the DH03, GK4-4 and GK4-6 lines.
Discussion
The considerable influence of the circadian clock on plant life is mediated, at least in part, by widespread regulation of gene expression; roughly one-third of the plant transcriptome shows circadian oscillations in transcript abundance (Covington et al. 2008), and an even larger proportion exhibits robust oscillation under diurnal cycles of light and temperature (Michael et al. 2008). It is becoming increasingly clear that this widespread circadian clock control enhances the growth and fitness of plants (Edwards et al. 2011; Hsu and Harmer 2014; Kim et al. 2008), and modulation of circadian clock function has been suggested as a strategy to ameliorate the adverse consequences of climate change (Kim et al. 2013b; Sanchez et al. 2011; Seo et al. 2012).
GI is encoded by a single gene in Arabidopsis (Huq et al. 2000), is plant specific, and has been found in all plants (Hayama et al. 2002; Dunford et al. 2005; Zhao et al. 2005; Curtis et al. 2002). GI was first characterized with respect to its functions in the elicitation of photoperiod-dependent flowering and in circadian clock maintenance (Koornneef et al. 1991; Fowler et al. 1999; Park et al. 1999; Mizoguchi et al. 2005). More recently, it has been discovered that GI also plays important roles in the response to multiple abiotic stresses, including tolerance to high salt and low (freezing) temperature (Cao et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2013b; Riboni et al. 2013; Xie et al. 2015).
Since its divergence from Arabidopsis, the B. rapa genome has undergone whole genome triplication followed by considerable fractionation (gene loss) (Parkin et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2011). Although circadian clock genes have been retained preferentially in the B. rapa genome (Lou et al. 2012), only a single copy of GI persists (Wang et al. 2011). The circadian cycling of BrGI mRNA abundance is similar to that of Arabidopsis GI (Fig. 1; Fowler et al. 1999; Park et al. 1999; Xie et al. 2015). BrGI also exhibits functional conservation with Arabidopsis GI, and expression of BrGI in the Arabidopsis late-flowering gi-201 mutant restores flowering time to that of the wild-type (Xie et al. 2015). In Arabidopsis, GI functions at least in part through direct interactions that affect the functions of other proteins (Sawa et al. 2007; Kim et al. 2007c, 2013c; Tseng et al. 2004). Consistent with this functional conservation, we show that BrGI retains a number of protein–protein interactions defined for Arabidopsis GI. GI physically and functionally interacts with ZTL, FKF1, and LKP2, which serve as blue light receptors that mediate light input to the clock (Kim et al. 2007c; Tseng et al. 2004). GI establishes and sustains oscillations of ZTL and maintains the TOC1 and PRR5 rhythms necessary for proper clock function through the GI–ZTL interaction, which mediates the regulated proteasomal degradation of TOC1 and PRR5 (Kim et al. 2007c). Yeast two-hybrid assays have also identified additional GI-interacting proteins, such as ADL3, a plant dynamin-like protein, and the COP1 E3 ubiquitin ligase, which serves as a repressor of light signal transduction (Abe et al. 2008; Yu et al. 2008). BrGI physically interacted with COP1 as well as with the ZTL/FKF1/LKP2 LOV-domain-based protein group (Fig. 2; Zoltowski and Imaizumi 2014). These observations strongly suggest that the BrGI protein is a functional Brassica rapa ortholog of GI that contributes to regulation of circadian rhythms and promotes photoperiodic flowering.
Recent studies have examined the role of GI in the B. rapa oilseed variety, R-o-18, but similar resources are not available for multiple varieties and for other morphotypes. We wished to expand our genetic analysis of GI into additional genetic backgrounds. Accordingly, using our transformation protocol, we perturbed GI expression through RNAi in a Chinese cabbage morphotype of B. rapa (Fig. 4c) and found that reduction of GI expression enhanced salt tolerance. These results are consistent with those of others (Kim et al. 2013b; Xie et al. 2015), but extend the results obtained from the oilseed and rapid cycling morphotypes to Chinese cabbage.
One important emphasis of current agricultural research is translation of our improved understanding of molecular mechanisms obtained from studies of model plants to diverse crops of agricultural significance. RNAi strategies have the potential to improve the resistance of crop plants against biotic stress, as well as increase knowledge of target genes (Koch and Kogel 2014). In this study, we implemented an RNAi strategy to manipulate expression of BrGI with the aim of improving salt tolerance in Chinese cabbage. We showed that decreased BrGI mRNA and protein levels in B. rapa enhanced salt tolerance compared with the wild-type (Figs. 5, 6). Critically, the partial downregulation of GI expression achieved via RNAi was sufficient to increase salt tolerance, yet was insufficient to delay flowering, which would likely have serious adverse consequences for crop yield. These results confirm GI as an attractive target for further efforts to improve a number of stress responses in agriculturally significant crops through transgenic manipulation. Moreover, standing natural variation in GI present among diverse cultivars (this study and Xie et al. 2015) also suggests GI to be a tractable target for conventional molecular breeding to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in both B. rapa and other crops.
Author contribution statement
JAK and WYK conceived and designed research. JAK, HJ, and VH conducted experiments. JKH, YHL, and JYK contributed new analytical tools. MJJ, JK, and DJY contributed plant materials and mutant seeds. JAK and CRM wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
References
Abe M, Fujiwara M, Kurotani K, Yokoi S, Shimamoto K (2008) Identification of dynamin as an interactor of rice GIGANTEA by tandem affinity purification (TAP). Plant Cell Physiol 49:420–432
Bell-Pedersen D, Cassone VM, Earnest DJ, Golden SS, Hardin PE, Thomas TL, Zoran MJ (2005) Circadian rhythms from multiple oscillators: lessons from diverse organisms. Nat Rev Genet 6:544–556
Cao S, Ye M, Jiang S (2005) Involvement of GIGANTEA gene in the regulation of the cold stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep 24:683–690
Covington MF, Maloof JN, Straume M, Kay SA, Harmer SL (2008) Global transcriptome analysis reveals circadian regulation of key pathways in plant growth and development. Genome Biol 9:R130
Curtis IS, Nam HG, Yun JY, Seo KH (2002) Expression of an antisense GIGANTEA (GI) gene fragment in transgenic radish causes delayed bolting and flowering. Transgenic Res 11:249–256
Dodd AN, Salathia N, Hall A, Kevei E, Toth R, Nagy F, Hibberd JM, Millar AJ, Webb AAR (2005) Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 309:630–633
Dong MA, Farré EM, Thomashow MF (2011) CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL regulate expression of the C-REPEAT BINDING FACTOR (CBF) pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:7241–7246
Dunford RP, Griffiths S, Christodoulou V, Laurie DA (2005) Characterisation of a barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) homologue of the Arabidopsis flowering time regulator GIGANTEA. Theor Appl Genet 110:925–931
Edwards CE, Ewers BE, Williams DG, Xie Q, Lou P, Xu X, McClung CR, Weinig C (2011) The genetic architecture of ecophysiological and circadian traits in Brassica rapa. Genetics 189:375–390
Fowler S, Lee K, Onouchi H, Samach A, Richardson K, Morris B, Coupland G, Putterill J (1999) GIGANTEA: a circadian clock-controlled gene that regulates photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis and encodes a protein with several possible membrane-spanning domains. EMBO J 18:4679–4688
Fowler SG, Cook D, Thomashow MF (2005) Low temperature induction of Arabidopsis CBF1, 2, and 3 is gated by the circadian clock. Plant Physiol 137:961–968
Gehan M, Greenham K, Mockler TC, McClung CR (2015) Transcriptional networks- crops, clocks, and abiotic stress. Curr Op Plant Biol 24:39–46
Graf A, Smith AM (2011) Starch and the clock: the dark side of plant productivity. Trends Plant Sci 16:169–175
Harmer SL (2009) The circadian system in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:357–377
Hayama R, Izawa T, Shimamoto K (2002) Isolation of rice genes possibly involved in the photoperiodic control of flowering by a fluorescent differential display method. Plant Cell Physiol 43:494–504
Hong JK, Hwnag JE, Zang YS, Lee SC, Kwon SJ, Mun JH, Kim HU, Kim JA, Jin M, Kim JS, Lee SI, Lim MH, Hur Y, Lim CO, Park BS (2008) Identification and characterization of the phytocystatin family from Brassica rapa. J Plant Biotechnol 35:317–327
Hong SY, Lee S, Seo PJ, Yang M-S, Park C-M (2010) Identification and molecular characterization of a Brachypodium distachyon GIGANTEA gene: functional conservation in monocot and dicot plants. Plant Mol Biol 72:485–497
Hsu PY, Harmer SL (2014) Wheels within wheels: the plant circadian system. Trends Plant Sci 19:240–249
Huq E, Tepperman JM, Quail PH (2000) GIGANTEA is a nuclear protein involved in phytochrome signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:9789–9794
Kim SY, Park BS, Kwon SJ, Kim J, Lim MH, Park YD, Kim DY, Suh SC, Jin YM, Ahn JH, Lee YH (2007a) Delayed flowering time in Arabidopsis and Brassica rapa by the overexpression of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) homologs isolated from Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Plant Cell Rep 26:327–336
Kim JA, Yang TJ, Kim JS, Park JY, Kwon SJ, Lim MH, Jin M, Lee SC, Lee SI, Choi BS, Um SH, Kim HI, Chun C, Park BS (2007b) Isolation of circadian-associated genes in Brassica rapa by comparative genomics with Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Cells 23:145–153
Kim WY, Fujiwara S, Suh SS, Kim J, Kim Y, Han L, David K, Putterill J, Nam HG, Somers DE (2007c) ZEITLUPE is a circadian photoreceptor stabilized by GIGANTEA in blue light. Nature 449:356–360
Kim J, Kim Y, Yeom M, Kim JH, Nam HG (2008) FIONA1 is essential for regulating period length in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 20:307–319
Kim JA, Kim JS, Hong JK, Lee YH, Choi BS, Seol YJ, Jeon CH (2012) Comparative mapping, genomic structure, and expression analysis of eight pseudo-response regulator genes in Brassica rapa. Mol Genet Genom 287:373–388
Kim J, Geng R, Gallenstein RA, Somers DE (2013a) The F-box protein ZEITLUPE controls stability and nucleocytoplasmic partitioning of GIGANTEA. Development 14:4060–4069
Kim WY, Ali Z, Park HJ, Park SJ, Cha JY, Perez-Hormaeche J, Quintero FJ, Shin G, Kim MR, Qiang Z, Ning L, Park HC, Lee SY, Bressan RA, Pardo JM, Bohnert HJ, Yun DJ (2013b) Release of SOS2 kinase from sequestration with GIGANTEA determines salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 4:1352
Kim Y, Lim J, Yeom M, Kim H, Kim J, Wang L, Kim WY, Somers DE, Nam HG (2013c) ELF4 regulates GIGANTEA chromatin access through subnuclear sequestration. Cell Rep 3:671–677
Koch A, Kogel K-H (2014) New wind in the sails: improving the agronomic value of crop plants through RNAi-mediated gene silencing. Plant Biotech J 12:821–831
Koornneef M, Hanhart CJ, van der Veen JH (1991) A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Genet Genom 229:57–66
Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5:150–163
Lee SG, Choi CS, Lee JG, Jang YA, Nam CW, Yeo KH, Lee HJ, Um YC (2012) Effects of different EC in nutrient solution on growth and quality of red mustard and Pak-Choi in plant factory. J Bio-Environ Control 21:322–326
Legnaioli T, Cuevas J, Mas P (2009) TOC1 functions as a molecular switch connecting the circadian clock with plant responses to drought. EMBO J 28:3745–3757
Lou P, Wu J, Cheng F, Cressman LG, Wang X, McClung CR (2012) Preferential retention of circadian clock genes during diploidization following whole genome triplication in Brassica rapa. Plant Cell 24:2415–2426
Martin-Tryon EL, Kreps JA, Harmer SL (2007) GIGANTEA acts in blue light signaling and has biochemically separable roles in circadian clock and flowering time regulation. Plant Physiol 143:473–486
Matsui A, Ishida J, Morosawa T, Mochizuki Y, Kaminuma E, Endo TA, Okamoto M, Nambara E, Nakajima M, Kawashima M, Satou M, Kim JM, Kobayashi N, Toyoda T, Shinozaki K, Seki M (2008) Arabidopsis transcriptome analysis under drought, cold, high-salinity and ABA treatment conditions using a tiling array. Plant Cell Physiol 49:1135–1149
Michael TP, Mockler TC, Breton G, McEntee C, Byer A, Trout JD, Hazen SP, Shen R, Priest HD, Sullivan CM, Givan SA, Yanovsky M, Hong F, Kay SA, Chory J (2008) Network discovery pipeline elucidates conserved time-of-day-specific cis-regulatory modules. PLoS Genet 4:e14
Mikkelsen MD, Thomashow MF (2009) A role for circadian evening elements in cold-regulated gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant J 60:328–339
Mizoguchi T, Wright L, Fujiwara S, Cremer F, Lee K, Onouchi H, Mouradov A, Fowler S, Kamada H, Putterill J, Coupland G (2005) Distinct roles of GIGANTEA in promoting flowering and regulating circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17:2255–2270
Mizuno T, Yamashino T (2008) Comparative transcriptome of diurnally oscillating genes and hormone-responsive genes in Arabidopsis thaliana: insight into circadian clock-controlled daily responses to common ambient stresses in plants. Plant Cell Physiol 49:481–487
Mun JH, Kwon SJ, Yang TJ, Seol YJ, Jin M, Kim JA, Lim MH, Kim JS, Baek S, Choi BS, Yu HJ, Kim DS, Kim N, Lim KB, Lee SI, Hahn JH, Lim YP, Bancroft I, Park BS (2009) Genome-wide comparative analysis of the Brassica rapa gene space reveals genome shrinkage and differential loss of duplicated genes after whole genome triplication. Genome Biol 10(10):R111
Park DH, Somers DE, Kim YS, Choy YH, Lim HK, Soh MS, Kim HJ, Kay SA, Nam HG (1999) Control of circadian rhythms and photoperiodic flowering by the Arabidopsis GIGANTEA gene. Science 285:1579–1582
Parkin IAP, Gulden SM, Sharpe AG, Lukens L, Trick M, Osborn TC (2005) Segmental structure of the Brassica napus genome based on comparative analysis with Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 171:765–781
Qiu Q-S, Barkla BJ, Vera-Estrella R, Zhu J-K, Schumaker KS (2003) Na+/H+ exchange activity in the plasma membrane of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 132:1041–1052
Riboni M, Galbiati M, Tonelli C, Conti L (2013) GIGANTEA enables drought escape response via abscisic acid-dependent activation of the florigens and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS. Plant Physiol 162:1706–1719
Ritchie RJ (2006) Consistent sets of spectrophotometric chlorophyll equations for acetone, methanol and ethanol solvents. Photosynth Res 89:27–41
Romanowski A, Yanovsky MJ (2015) Circadian rhythms and post-transcriptional regulation in higher plants. Front. Plant Sci 6:437
Salomé PA, McClung CR (2005) What makes the Arabidopsis clock tick on time? A review on entrainment. Plant Cell Environ 28:21–38
Sanchez A, Shin J, Davis SJ (2011) Abiotic stress and the plant circadian clock. Plant Signal Behav 6:223–231
Sawa M, Nusinow DA, Kay SA, Imaizumi T (2007) FKF1 and GIGANTEA complex formation is required for day-length measurement in Arabidopsis. Science 318:261–265
Schranz M, Lysak M, Mitchell-Olds T (2006) The ABCs of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: building blocks of crucifer genomes. Trends Plant Sci 11:535–542
Seo PJ, Park MJ, Lim MH, Kim SG, Lee M, Baldwin IT, Park CM (2012) A self-regulatory circuit of CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED1 underlies the circadian clock regulation of temperature responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24:2427–2442
Staiger D, Brown JWS (2013) Alternative splicing at the intersection of biological timing, development, and stress responses. Plant Cell 25:3640–3656
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22(22):4673–4680
Tseng TS, Salomé PA, McClung CR, Olszewski NE (2004) SPINDLY and GIGANTEA interact and act in Arabidopsis thaliana pathways involved in light responses, flowering, and rhythms in cotyledon movements. Plant Cell 16:1550–1563
Wang X, Wang H, Wang J, Brassica rapa Genome Sequencing Project Consortium et al (2011) The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat Genet 28:1035–1039
Xie Q, Lou P, Hermand V, Aman R, Park HJ, Yun DJ, Kim WY, Salmela MJ, Ewers BE, Weinig C, Khan SL, Schaible DL, McClung CR (2015) Allelic polymorphism of GIGANTEA is responsible for naturally occurring variation in circadian period in Brassica rapa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:3829–3834
Yu JW, Rubio V, Lee NY, Bai S, Lee SY, Kim SS, Liu L, Zhang Y, Irigoyen ML, Sullivan JA, Zhang Y, Lee I, Xie Q, Paek NC, Deng XW (2008) COP1 and ELF3 control circadian function and photoperiodic flowering by regulating GI stability. Mol Cell 32:617–630
Zerr DM, Hall JC, Rosbash M, Siwicki KK (1990) Circadian rhythms of period protein immunoreactivity in the CNS and the visual system of Drosophila. J Neurosci 10:2749–2762
Zhao XY, Liu MS, Li JR, Guan CM, Zhang XS (2005) The wheat TaGI1, involved in photoperiodic flowering, encodes an Arabidopsis GI ortholog. Plant Mol Biol 58:53–64
Zoltowski BD, Imaizumi T (2014) Structure and function of the ZTL/FKF1/LKP2 group proteins in Arabidopsis. Enzyme 35:213–239
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Research Program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development, National Academy of Agricultural Science, (Project No. PJ10025) to JAK and from Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea, BioGreen 21 Program (Project No. PJ01106901, PJ01106902, and PJ009615) to YWK, JAK, and CRM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.
Additional information
Communicated by I. Hwang.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Figure 1. BrGI structure and phylogenetic comparison with other plant GI proteins. (A) Alignment of the GI protein sequences of Brassica rapa (BrGI) and Arabidopsis thaliana (GI) using ClustalW. B. Exon–intron structure of the BrGI and GI genes. Black boxes indicate exons; lines represent introns. C. Phylogenetic comparison of the GI proteins from several dicot and monocot species. The GI protein sequences used were A. thaliana (GI; NM_102124.2), Populus trichocarpa (PtGI; XM_002307480.1), Triticum aestivum (TaGI1; AF543844.1), Hordeum vulgare (HVGI; AY740524.1), Ricinus communis (Rc; XM_002524295.1), Ipomoea nil (InGI; AB265781.1), Allium cepa (AcGIa; GQ232756.1 and AcGIb; GQ232757.1), and Oryza sativa (OsGI; NM_001048755.1). Trees were constructed using the neighbor-joining method in the MEGA software, version 4.0 (Kumar et al. 2004). Bar represents 0.05 residue substitutions per site
Supplementary Figure 2. Germination and growth of the indicated B. rapa genotypes under the indicated salt conditions. Seeds were sown on ½ MS salts, 2% sucrose, and 1% agar supplied with the indicated NaCl concentrations and grown for 2 weeks
Supplementary Figure 3. GIGANTEA protein abundance in 2-week-old transgenic B. rapa measured by Western blot analysis using an antibody directed against Arabidopsis GI.Arabidopsis wild-type (Col-0) harvested at ZT1 and ZT13 and 35S::GI-HA (constitutive GI overexpression line) plants were used as GI protein controls. B. rapa transgenic plants were harvested at ZT12.
Supplementary Figure 4. Seeds of the indicated genotypes were sown in sponge cubes and grown in nutrient solution for 2 weeks. After two to three true leaves had developed, the nutrient solution was replaced with that including either 0 or 150 mM NaCl every 2 days for 1 week.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J.A., Jung, He., Hong, J.K. et al. Reduction of GIGANTEA expression in transgenic Brassica rapa enhances salt tolerance. Plant Cell Rep 35, 1943–1954 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-2008-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-2008-9