Abstract
Classical ecological theory predicts that environmental stochasticity increases extinction risk by reducing the average per-capita growth rate of populations. For sedentary populations in a spatially homogeneous yet temporally variable environment, a simple model of population growth is a stochastic differential equation dZ t = μ Z t dt + σ Z t dW t , t ≥ 0, where the conditional law of Z t+Δt − Z t given Z t = z has mean and variance approximately z μΔt and z 2 σ 2Δt when the time increment Δt is small. The long-term stochastic growth rate \({\lim_{t \to \infty} t^{-1}\log Z_t}\) for such a population equals \({\mu -\frac{\sigma^2}{2}}\) . Most populations, however, experience spatial as well as temporal variability. To understand the interactive effects of environmental stochasticity, spatial heterogeneity, and dispersal on population growth, we study an analogous model \({{\bf X}_t = (X_t^1, \ldots, X_t^n)}\) , t ≥ 0, for the population abundances in n patches: the conditional law of X t+Δt given X t = x is such that the conditional mean of \({X_{t+\Delta t}^i - X_t^i}\) is approximately \({[x^i \mu_i + \sum_j (x^j D_{ji} - x^i D_{ij})] \Delta t}\) where μ i is the per capita growth rate in the ith patch and D ij is the dispersal rate from the ith patch to the jth patch, and the conditional covariance of \({X_{t+\Delta t}^i - X_t^i}\) and \({X_{t + \Delta t}^j - X_t^j}\) is approximately x i x j σ ij Δt for some covariance matrix Σ = (σ ij ). We show for such a spatially extended population that if \({S_t = X_t^1 + \cdots + X_t^n}\) denotes the total population abundance, then Y t = X t /S t , the vector of patch proportions, converges in law to a random vector Y ∞ as \({t \to \infty}\) , and the stochastic growth rate \({\lim_{t \to \infty} t^{-1}\log S_t}\) equals the space-time average per-capita growth rate \({\sum_i \mu_i \mathbb{E}[Y_\infty^i]}\) experienced by the population minus half of the space-time average temporal variation \({\mathbb{E}[\sum_{i,j}\sigma_{ij}Y_\infty^i Y_\infty^j]}\) experienced by the population. Using this characterization of the stochastic growth rate, we derive an explicit expression for the stochastic growth rate for populations living in two patches, determine which choices of the dispersal matrix D produce the maximal stochastic growth rate for a freely dispersing population, derive an analytic approximation of the stochastic growth rate for dispersal limited populations, and use group theoretic techniques to approximate the stochastic growth rate for populations living in multi-scale landscapes (e.g. insects on plants in meadows on islands). Our results provide fundamental insights into “ideal free” movement in the face of uncertainty, the persistence of coupled sink populations, the evolution of dispersal rates, and the single large or several small (SLOSS) debate in conservation biology. For example, our analysis implies that even in the absence of density-dependent feedbacks, ideal-free dispersers occupy multiple patches in spatially heterogeneous environments provided environmental fluctuations are sufficiently strong and sufficiently weakly correlated across space. In contrast, for diffusively dispersing populations living in similar environments, intermediate dispersal rates maximize their stochastic growth rate.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adler FR (1992) The effects of averaging on the basic reproduction ratio. Math Biosci 111: 89–98
Bascompte J, Possingham H, Roughgarden J (2002) Patchy populations in stochastic environments: critical number of patches for persistence. Am Nat 159: 128–137
Benaïm M, Schreiber SJ (2009) Persistence of structured populations in random environments. Theor Popul Biol 76: 19–34
Bhattacharya RN (1978) Criteria for recurrence and existence of invariant measures for multidimensional diffusions. Ann Probab 6(4):541–553. ISSN 00911798. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2243121
Bogachev VI, Röckner M, Stannat W (2002) Uniqueness of solutions of elliptic equations and uniqueness of invariant measures of diffusions. Sbornik: Math 193(7):945. http://stacks.iop.org/1064-5616/193/i=7/a=A01
Bogachev Vladimir I, Krylov Nikolai V, Röckner Michael (2009) Elliptic and parabolic equations for measures. Russ Math Surv 64(6):973. http://stacks.iop.org/0036-0279/64/i=6/a=R02
Boyce MS, Haridas CV, Lee CT, the NCEAS Stochastic Demography Working Group (2006) Demography in an increasingly variable world. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 141–148
Cantrell RS, Cosner C (1991) The effects of spatial heterogeneity in population dynamics. J Math Biol 29: 315–338
Cantrell RS, Cosner C, Lou Y (2006) Movement toward better environments and the evolution of rapid diffusion. Math Biosci 204(2): 199–214
Cantrell RS, Cosner C (1989) Diffusive logistic equations with indefinite weights: population models in disrupted environments. Proc Royal Soc Edinburgh Section A Math 112(3–4): 293–318
Cantrell RS, Cosner C, Deangelis DL, Padron V (2007) The ideal free distribution as an evolutionarily stable strategy. J Biol Dyn 1: 249–271
Chesson PL (2000) General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theor Popul Biol 58: 211–237
Da Prato G, Zabczyk J (1996) Ergodicity for Infinite-Dimensional Systems, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol 229. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
DeAngelis DL, Wolkowicz GSK, Lou Y, Jiang Y, Novak M, Svanbäck R, Araújo MS, Jo YS, Cleary EA (2011) The effect of travel loss on evolutionarily stable distributions of populations in space. Am Nat 178: 15–29
Delibes M, Gaona P, Ferreras P (2001) Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection. Am Nat 158: 277–285
Dennis B, Munholland PL, Scott JM (1991) Estimation of growth and extinction parameters for endangered species. Ecol Monogr 61: 115–143
Diaconis P (1988) Group representations in probability and statistics. Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes—Monograph Series, vol 11. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward
Diamond JM (1975) The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biol Conserv 7: 129–146
Dias PC (1996) Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol Evol 11:326–330
Dockery J, Hutson V, Mischaikow K, Pernarowski M (1998) The evolution of slow dispersal rates: a reaction diffusion model. J Math Biol 37: 61–83
Durrett R, Remenik D (2012) Evolution of the dispersal distance. J Math Biol (in press)
Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manag 61: 603–610
Fahrig L (2002) Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 12: 346–353
Foley P (1994) Predicting extinction times from environmental stochasticity and carrying capacity. Conserv Biol 8:124–137
Fretwell SD, Lucas HL Jr. (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheoretica 19:16–36
Gardiner CW (2004) Handbook of Stochastic Methods: for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences, Series in synergetics, vol 13, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin
Geiß C, Manthey R (1994) Comparison theorems for stochastic differential equations in finite and infinite dimensions. Stoch Processes Appl 53: 23–35
Gilpin ME (1988) A comment on Quinn and Hastings: extinction in subdivided habitats. Conserv Biol 2: 290–292
Gonzalez A, Holt RD (2002) The inflationary effects of environmental fluctuations in source-sink systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99: 14872–14877
Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM (2007) Table of integrals, series, and products. Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 7th edn, 2007. Translated from the Russian, Translation edited and with a preface by Alan Jeffrey and Daniel Zwillinger
Harper DGC (1982) Competitive foraging in mallards: “ideal free” ducks. Animal Behav 30: 575–584
Harrison S, Quinn JF (1989) Correlated environments and the persistence of metapopulations. Oikos 56: 293–298
Hastings A (1983) Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal?. Theor Popul Biol 24: 244–251
Holt RD (1985) Patch dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribtuion. Theor Popul Biol 28: 181–208
Holt RD (1997) On the evolutionary stability of sink populations. Evol Ecol 11: 723–731
Holt RD, McPeek MA (1996) Chaotic population dynamics favors the evolution of dispersal. Am Nat 148(44): 709–718
Hutson V, Mischaikow K, Poláčik P (2001) The evolution of dispersal rates in a heterogeneous time-periodic environment. J Math Biol 43: 501–533
Ikeda N, Watanabe S (1989) Stochastic differential equations and diffusion processes, North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol 24, 2nd edn. North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam
Jansen VAA, Yoshimura J (1998) Populations can persist in an environment consisting of sink habitats only. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 3696–3698
Keagy J, Schreiber SJ, Cristol DA (2005) Replacing sources with sinks: when do populations go down the drain?. Restor Ecol 13: 529–535
Khas’minskii RZ (1960) Ergodic properties of recurrent diffusion processes and stabilization of the solution to the cauchy problem for parabolic equations. Theory Probab Appl 5(2):179–196, 1960. ISSN 0040585X. doi:10.1137/1105016.
Kirkland S, Li CK, Schreiber SJ (2006) On the evolution of dispersal in patchy landscapes. SIAM J Appl Math 66: 1366–1382
Kreuzer MP, Huntly NJ (2003) Habitat-specific demography: evidence for source-sink population structure in a mammal, the pika. Oecologia 134: 343–349
Lande R, Engen S, Sæther BE (2003) Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Levin SA, Cohen D, Hastings A (1984) Dispersal strategies in patchy environments. Theor Popul Biol 26: 165–191
Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull ESA 15: 237–240
Lonsdale WM (1993) Rates of spread of an invading species-mimosa pigra in northern Australia. J Ecol 81: 513–521
Lundberg P, Ranta E, Ripa J, Kaitala V (2000) Population variability in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 15: 460–464
Matthews DP, Gonzalez A (2007) The inflationary effects of environmental fluctuations ensure the persistence of sink metapopulations. Ecology 88: 2848–2856
May RM (1975) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
McPeek MA, Holt RD (1992) The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am Nat 6: 1010–1027
Metz JAJ, de Jong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL (1983) What are the advantages of dispersing; a paper by Kuno extended. Oecologia 57: 166–169
Murphy MT (2001) Source-sink dynamics of a declining eastern kingbird population and the value of sink habitats. Conserv Biol 15: 737–748
Oksanen T, Power ME, Oksanen L (1995) Ideal free habitat selection and consumer-resource dynamics. Am Nat 146: 565–585
Petchey OL, Gonzalez A, Wilson HB (1997) Effects on population persistence: the interaction between environmental noise colour, intraspecific competition and space. Proc Biol Sci 264: 1841–1847
Philippi T, Seger J (1989) Hedging one’s evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends Ecol Evol 4: 41–44
Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132: 652–661
Quinn JF, Hastings A (1987) Extinction in subdivided habitats. Conserv Biol 1: 198–209
Remeš V (2000) How can maladaptive habitat choice generate source-sink population dynamics?. Oikos 91: 579–582
Roy M, Holt RD, Barfield M (2005) Temporal autocorrelation can enhance the persistence and abundance of metapopulations comprised of coupled sinks. Am Nat 166: 246–261
Ruelle D (1979) Analycity properties of the characteristic exponents of random matrix products. Adv Math 32: 68–80
Schmidt KA (2004) Site fidelity in temporally correlated environments enhances population persistence. Ecol Lett 7: 176–184
Schreiber SJ (2010) Interactive effects of temporal correlations, spatial heterogeneity, and dispersal on population persistence. Proc Royal Soc Biol Sci 277: 1907–1914
Schreiber SJ, Lloyd-Smith JO (2009) Invasion dynamics in spatially heterogenous environments. Am Nat 174: 490–505
Schreiber SJ, Saltzman E (2009) Evolution of predator and prey movement into sink habitats. Am Nat 174: 68–81
Schreiber SJ, Vejdani M (2006) Handling time promotes the coevolution of aggregation in predator–prey systems. Proc Royal Soc Biol Sci 273: 185–191
Schreiber SJ, Fox LR, Getz WM (2000) Coevolution of contrary choices in host-parasitoid systems. American Naturalist 637–648
Serre JP (1977) Linear representations of finite groups. Springer, New York. Translated from the second French edition by Leonard L. Scott, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol 42
Slatkin M (1974) Hedging one’s evolutionary bets. Nature 250: 704–705
Talay Denis (1991) Approximation of upper Lyapunov exponents of bilinear stochastic differential systems. SIAM J Numer Anal 28(4):1141–1164. ISSN 00361429. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2157791
Tuljapurkar S (1990) Population dynamics in variable environments. Springer, New York
Turelli M (1978) Random environments and stochastic calculus. Theor Popul Biol 12: 140–178
van Baalen M, Sabelis MW (1999) Nonequilibrium population dynamics of “ideal and free” prey and predators. Am Nat 154: 69–88
Wilbur HM, Rudolf VHW (2006) Life-history evolution in uncertain environments: bet hedging in time. Am Nat 168: 398–411
Wilcox BA, Murphy DD (1985) Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. Am Nat 125: 879–887
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
The Below is the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, S.N., Ralph, P.L., Schreiber, S.J. et al. Stochastic population growth in spatially heterogeneous environments. J. Math. Biol. 66, 423–476 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-012-0514-0
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-012-0514-0
Keywords
- Stochastic population growth
- Spatial and temporal heterogeneity
- Dominant Lyapunov exponent
- Ideal free movement
- Evolution of dispersal
- Single large or several small debate
- Habitat fragmentation