Abstract
Probiotics are the living and non-pathogenic microbial supplements which, upon administration in adequate quantities, influence the host organism positively by improving gut health and enhancing intestinal mucosal integrity. They suppress potentially pathogenic microorganisms by competing with them for nutrients as well as space for gut adherence. Lactobacillus species are the most commonly used bacteria in the probiotic preparations and studies show that they have cholesterol-lowering effects on the hosts. Lipids are biological molecules that are insoluble in water and bile salts play a major role in their digestion as they are synthesized and conjugated to taurine or glycine in the liver. Bile salt hydrolase deconjugates taurine or glycine from bile salts. Cholesterol metabolism is influenced by the effect of Lactobacillus species on microbial populations as well as overall metabolic activity of human intestinal microflora. Deconjugation of bile salt, concentration of short-chain fatty acids and molar proportion of propionate constitute the major processes by which cholesterol lowering is brought about by Lactobacillus species. This review summarizes the cholesterol-lowering properties of this species. A significant number of Lactobacillus strains have been known to display substantial bile salt hydrolase activities and identifying those strains for use in therapeutic purposes can be a great advancement. Here, this identification is done using phylogenetic relationship for different identified potential probiotic Lactobacillus strains.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Probiotics are live microbial entities having beneficial roles towards the host which involve improvement of the microbial balance inside the host’s intestine. They are essentially live and non-pathogenic microbes which, upon administration in sufficient dosage, confer beneficial effects on the health of the host organism [1]. They are also referred as “good microorganisms” and can be found in the form of oral consumer products such as dietary supplements, chocolates, yogurts and many others [2].
The father of probiotics, Elie Metchnikoff proposed in "The Prolongation of Life: Optimistic Studies", that ingestion of microbes might have significant benefits for human health, and this led to the emergence of the concept of probiotics, at the start of the twentieth century [3]. The gastrointestinal tract of humans has a surface area higher than 400 m2 and this is where the commensal microbes have the highest concentration. Moreover, the GI tract comprises a rich microflora having higher than 500 species of bacteria, out of which several show beneficial roles towards human health. These benefits broadly include normalizing intestine, providing better immune response and enhancement of metabolic effect of our body [4]. Benefits of probiotics also include improvement of gut health, enhancement of intestinal mucosal integrity, suppression of potentially pathogenic microorganisms through competition for nutrients and space for gut adherence, antihypertensive effects, reduction in allergic symptoms, prevention of cancer, facilitation of mineral absorption, cholesterol-lowering effects, amelioration of arthritis and reduction of dermises symptoms [5].
A high degree of viability of cells and resistance to acidic conditions are the major requirements for a microorganism to be used as a probiotic. The properties of persistence of the cells in the intestine and adhesion to gut epithelium to reduce the flushing effects of peristalsis is also desired [6]. Probiotics should also be able to interact with and send signals to immune cells, having association with gut and resistance towards processing and must have the capacity to influence local metabolic activities. It should be kept in mind that the majority of probiotics are of human origin and are non-pathogenic (Fig. 1) [7].
Probiotic formulations are mostly prepared from the genera of Lactobacillus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Bifidobacterium, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Nissle (EcN) 1917, Enterococcus and Bacillus. Few strains of the yeast genus Saccharomyces have also been used as probiotics [8]. Bifidobacteria are among the very first colonizers of human intestinal tract after birth and they are the predominant group in breast-fed infants’ colonic microbiota [9]. Different strains of probiotics are administered in different dosages like for Lactobacillus sp. 1 to 20 CFU per day and for Saccharomyces boulardii 250 to 500 mg per day is sufficient [10]. Using antibiotics or immunosuppressive therapies might cause some alterations in the gut composition and can affect the microbiota of the gastrointestinal tract. Introduction of such beneficial bacterial species of probiotics to the GI tract is a promising option to re-establish microbial equilibrium of gut and prevent diseases [11].
The mechanisms by which probiotics help in achieving health benefits involve modifying the composition or function of the gut microbiota, reducing the colonic pH, improving immune response, stimulating cell development, bolstering intestinal barrier function, inhibiting gut pathogens and fostering nutrient absorption [12]. This review summarizes the cholesterol-lowering properties of Lactobacillus species.
Mechanism Involved in Lowering of Cholesterol
Cholesterol
In aqueous environments, biological molecules such as lipids display properties of insolubility, since they constitute a hydrophobic region, which is non-polar in nature and thus prevent their dissolution in water [13]. Eukaryotic and bacterial cells have phospholipids and glycolipids. In lipoproteins, HDL (high-density lipoproteins), vLDL (very low-density lipoproteins), chylomicrons and LDL (low-density lipoproteins) are formed by the arrangement of lipid and protein units in varying concentrations [14]. The protein amount increases from chylomicrons to HDL. Chylomicrons are responsible for the deliverance of fat that we have absorbed in our diet to the body tissues while HDL removes excess of cholesterol from the tissues and transfer them back to the liver [15].
According to the World Health Organization, cardiovascular ailments have been estimated to become the major cause of death by the year 2030, and will affect approximately 23 million human beings worldwide [16]. It has been reported that hypercholesterolemia resulted in 45% of heart attacks in Western Europe and 35% in Central and Eastern Europe, since 2000 [17]. People with hypercholesterolemia have a three times higher risk of suffering from heart attack than people with normal levels of lipid profile [18].
Biosynthesis of Cholesterol
Our diet contains fats, carbohydrates and proteins. These get digested and then absorbed in the duodenum of small intestine. On the apical side of small intestine there is sodium glucose transmitter which takes 1 glucose for 2 molecules of sodium. Glucose is then reabsorbed in the blood [19]. The fat in the diet form lipid droplets which are digested and emulsified to micelles, which are then absorbed into intestinal cells as monoglycerides, fatty acids and cholesterol. These when coated with apoproteins make chylomicrons. They are absorbed in the blood via lymph and circulate in the body as circulating lipids. The remaining arrive at the liver and bind to the LDL receptor and brought to the hepatic cells [20].
Glucose undergoes glycolysis to form pyruvic acid and further acetyl co-A which via HMG co-A reductase enzyme forms cholesterol (Fig. 2). The glycerol thus obtained along with malonyl co-A forms monoglycerol and then triglycerol. These are packaged with cholesterol apoprotein in golgi apparatus from where vLDL transports them to the tissues for energy or storage. The vLDL liberates fatty acids by action of lipases to form ILDL(intermediate LDL) and then to LDL which reaches liver and is excreted through bile or recycled in golgi apparatus to make more lipoproteins. Excess of cholesterol is secreted through bile. The empty HDL enters into circulation and picks up cholesterol from tissues containing excess and returns them to the liver or they are excreted depending upon how much cholesterol is needed by the body [21].
Bile Salt Deconjugation
Bile is a liquid secretion of the liver having a yellowish-green color. Bile’s major functions include fat digestion and absorption. It also serves as a means for excretion of waste products from the blood. Major constituents are bile acids, cholesterol, phospholipids, bile pigments, ions and water [22]. Bile acids are produced from cholesterol inside the liver. Cholic as well as chenodeoxycholic acids are primary forms of bile acids that are synthesized by hepatocytes. Secretions of bile acids constitute conjugates with glycine or taurine. Bacteria act on primary bile acids and convert them to secondary bile acids by dehydroxylation [23].
Bile Salt Hydrolase
The intestinal microbiota secrete an important enzyme known as bile salt hydrolase (BSH). This enzyme aids in the catalysis of deconjugation of bile salts linked with glycine or taurine. Glycine or taurine are liberated from the core of a steroid, when amide bonds undergo hydrolysis by BSH enzymes. The resulting acids are known as unconjugated or deconjugated bile acids [24]. It has been shown that Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus and Clostridium sp. possess BSH activity. At low pH, the glycoconjugated bile salts are toxic in nature. BSH enzymes play an essential role in alleviating these toxic effects of glycoconjugated bile salts, by letting bile enter into the intestinal duodenum or microenvironments, when the pH gets low due to lactic acid bacteria [25].
The selection criterion for probiotic microbes having the properties of decreasing the levels of cholesterol, must include BSH activity. BSH enzyme is responsible for bile salt deconjugation during enterohepatic circulation. Deconjugation is catalyzed by BSH enzyme which hydrolyses amide bonds and glycine or taurine groups are released from the core of the steroid [26]. Deconjugated bile salts have low solubility and are absorbed with lesser efficiency as compared to their conjugated counterparts from inside the lumen of intestine, as a result of which, an excess of free bile is excreted in fecal matter. Free bile salts display lower efficiency in solubilising and absorbing lipids inside the intestine [26]. Thus, serum cholesterol is reduced due to deconjugation of bile salts, as there is an increased requirement for cholesterol during the pathway for de novo synthesis (Fig. 3) [27].
Lactobacillus Species as Probiotic and Strains Mediating Cholesterol Reduction
The use of Lactobacillus species in disease prevention and treatment is very common. It is also used for health restoration and maintenance. However, recently, there has been a shift in the use of these strains as probiotics. According to in vitro utilization in human data, these strains can only be considered as good probiotics for humans [28].
The properties such as adherence to cells, reduction in adherence to pathogens, persistence and multiplication, formation of hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins (that show antagonism to pathogenic proliferation), safe and non-invasive nature as well as non-pathogenicity and non-carcinogenicity are essential for a strain to be a good probiotic [29].
The adhesion properties of the species of Lactobacillus have been studied by various experiments. Scientists have explicated the cell wall protein mechanisms and cell wall bonded exopolysaccharides for Lactobacillus delbrueckii. Antikainen et al. [30] have categorized the adhesion proteins from Lactobacillus into five categories, namely anchorless housekeeping proteins, surface layer proteins, LPXTG-motif proteins, transporter proteins and other proteins. Bacterial auto-aggregation and the hydrophobic nature of the cell surface play key factors in the adhesion and colonization capabilities possessed by probiotic species. These also influence the adhesion characteristics and prevent the binding of pathogens to the gut lining [31].
Significant reduction in the amount of serum cholesterol, after consumption of large quantities of fermented milk containing Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium or both was observed by Mann and Spoerry [32]. The adhesive abilities possessed by these species to mucosal surfaces of the intestine for a long- or short-term colonization result in a biofilm formation and subsequently have many benefits such as hypo-cholesteremic effect [33].
Experiments have shown that the increase in the deconjugation of the bile acids results in the greater excretion of bile salts from the intestinal tract which triggers synthesis of replacement of bile salts from the cholesterol. This provides potential to reduce the cholesterol levels significantly in the body [34]. The effect of Lactobacillus species on triglycerides is due to the action of lipase from Lactobacilli which actually breaks the larger molecules of fat into simpler and easy to digest substrates such as, fatty acids and glycerol. Apart from this experiment, studies show that the mix of the L. acidophilus and S. faecalis decreased the synthesis of cholesterol and shows effects on LDL, VLDL and HDL cholesterol [10]. Further, it was shown that L. acidophilus can enhance the reduction of serum cholesterol in hypercholesteremic rats. The feasibility of Lactobacillus strain in the human gut and ultimately colonizing in the small intestine remains the most important aspect for the hypocholesteremic results of the probiotics as most of the absorption of the cholesterol takes place in the same area [35].
The strains listed in Table 1 represent strains fulfilling the criteria of discussion along with their bsh homologs. The second table (Table 2) shows the major findings for different probiotic Lactobacillus species in various experimental setups mediating the cholesterol reduction as a result.
The strains that are listed in Table 1 fulfill the criteria as potential probiotic for cholesterol-lowering effects. To determine the phylogentic relationship of these strains their bsh homologs were extracted and used to construct a phylogentic tree (Fig. 4) depicting the degree of gene similarity of different strains with each other. Table 2 was constructed showing the major findings as to what is the mechanism of action and effects by every probiotic Lactobacillus species in various experimental setups mediating the cholesterol reduction as a result.
Maximum likelihood method, which is based on the JTT matrix-based model, was used to draw inference on the evolutionary history [45]. The tree with the highest log likelihood (− 3805.3813) is shown. To obtain the initial tree(s) for the heuristic search, neighbor-join as well as BioNJ algorithms were applied to matrices of pairwise distances predicted utilizing a JTT model, and then selection of a topology with superior likelihood value for log was done. The tree was then drawn, which was to scale, and the branch lengths were measured in the number of substitutions per site. Sixteen amino acid sequences were used in the analysis. Elimination of all positions containing gaps along with missing 0 data was carried out. In the final dataset, a total of 133 positions were obtained. MEGA7 was used to carry out evolutionary analyses [46].
Conclusion
Probiotics having many health benefits are attaining much attention. Their benefits include decreasing the cholesterol serum levels; improving the lactose intolerance, digestion and showing superior resistant capacity towards the infections in GI tract and cancer inhibition. Many studies have been conducted on potential hypocholesterolemic properties of different probiotic strains administered to humans. Numerous pathways for the removal of cholesterol by Lactobacillus strains have been hypothesized which include assimilating cholesterol inside growing cells, attachment of cholesterol to cell surface, incorporating cholesterol inside cell membrane, utilizing bile salt hydrolase to deconjugate bile, and then precipitation of cholesterol along deconjugated bile. More recently, it has been discovered that many probiotic Lactobacillus strains show elevated BSH activities and identifying those strains for using in therapeutic purposes can be a great advancement.
References
Gupta V, Garg R (2009) Probiotics. Indian J Med Microbiol 27(3):202–209. https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.53201
Harper A, Naghibi MM, Garcha D (2018) The role of bacteria, probiotics and diet in irritable bowel syndrome. Foods 7(2):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7020013
Sánchez B, Delgado S, Blanco-Míguez A et al (2017) Probiotics, gut microbiota, and their influence on host health and disease. Mol Nutr Food Res 61:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600240
Markowiak P (2017) Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients 9(1021):1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9091021
Chumpitazi BP, Shulman RJ (2016) Underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms in childhood irritable bowel syndrome. Mol Cell Pediatr 3(11):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40348-016-0036-8
Aziz I, Törnblom H, Simrén M et al (2017) Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth as a cause for irritable bowel syndrome. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 33:196–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000348
Lerardi E (2017) Noninvasive molecular analysis of Helicobacter pylori: Is it time for tailored first-line therapy? World J Gastroenterol 23:2453–2458. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i14.2453
Ooi L, Liong M-T (2010) Cholesterol-lowering effects of probiotics and prebiotics: a review of in vivo and in vitro findings. Int J Mol Sci 11:2499–2522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11062499
Dunne C, O'Mahony L, Murphy L et al (2001) In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings. Am J Clin Nutr 73:386S–392S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/73.2.386s
Begley M, Hill C, Cormac GH et al (2006) Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(3):1729–1738. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.3.1729-1738.2006
Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O'Morain CA et al (2017) European helicobacter and microbiota study group and consensus panel management of Helicobacter pylori infection the Maastricht V/florence consensus report. Gut 66:6–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312288
Nguyen TDT, Kang JH (2007) Characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum PH04, a potential probiotic bacterium with cholesterol-lowering effects. Int J Food Microbiol 113:358–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.08.015
Croft JB, Cresanta JL (1988) Cardiovascular risk in parents of children with extreme lipoprotein cholesterol levels: the Bogalusa heart study. South Med J 81(3):341–349. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-198803000-00014
Pereira D, McCartney AL et al (2003) An in vitro study of the probiotic potential of a bile-salt-hydrolyzing Lactobacillus fermentum strain, and determination of its cholesterol-lowering properties. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4743–4752. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.8.4743-4752.2003
Tsai CC, Lin PP, Hsieh YM et al (2014) Cholesterol-lowering potentials of lactic acid bacteria based on bile-salt hydrolase activity and effect of potent strains on cholesterol metabolism in vitro and in vivo. Sci World J 2014:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/690752
Joyce SA, MacSharry J, Casey PG et al (2014) Regulation of host weight gain and lipid metabolism by bacterial bile acid modification in the gut. PNAS 111(20):7421–7426. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323599111
Brian V, Begley M, Hill C et al (2008) Functional and comparative metagenomic analysis of bile salt hydrolase activity in the human gut microbiome. PNAS 105(36):13580–13585. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804437105
Reid G (1999) The scientific basis for probiotic strains of Lactobacillus. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(9):3763–3766
Kumar M, Nagpal R, Kumar R et al (2012) Cholesterol-lowering probiotics as potential biotherapeutics for metabolic diseases. Exp Diabetes Res 2012:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/902917
Bayat A, Azizi-Soleiman F, Heidari-Beni M et al (2016) Effect of Cucurbita ficifolia and probiotic yogurt consumption on blood glucose, lipid profile, and inflammatory marker in type 2 diabetes. Int J Prev Med 7(30):1–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.175455
Hua LM (2016) Type 2 diabetes and probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics: a meta-analysis. Chin J Microecol 28:1257–1268
Woting A, Blaut M (2016) The intestinal microbiota in metabolic disease. Nutrients 8:1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8040202
Kobyliak N, Tetyana F, Oleksandr V et al (2016) Comparative experimental investigation on the efficacy of mono- and multiprobiotic strains in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention. BMC Gastroenterol 16(34):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0451-2
Ryan PM, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF et al (2015) Functional food addressing heart health: do we have to target the gut microbiota? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 18(6):566–571. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000000224
Moss JW, Ramji DP et al (2016) Nutraceutical therapies for atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol 13:513–532. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2016.103
Madjd TMA, Mousavi N et al (2016) Comparison of the effect of daily consumption of probiotic compared with low-fat conventional yogurt on weight loss in healthy obese women following an energy-restricted diet: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 103:323–329. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.120170
Michael DR, Moss JW, Calvente DL et al (2016) Lactobacillus plantarum CUL66 can impact cholesterol homeostasis in Caco-2 enterocytes. Benef Microbes 7(3):443–451. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2015.0146
Shehataet MG, El Sohaimy SA, Malak A et al (2016) Screening of isolated potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria for cholesterol lowering property and bile salt hydrolase activity. Ann Agric Sci 61:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2016.03.001
Sieo SM, Sieo CC, Ramasamy K et al (2014) Effects of dietary prebiotics, probiotic and synbiotics on performance, caecal bacterial populations and caecal fermentation concentrations of broiler chickens. J Sci Food Agric 94:341–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6365
Antikainen J, Korhonen TK, Kuparinen V (2009) Surface proteins of Lactobacillus involved in host interactions. In: Ljungh A, Wadström T (eds) Lactobacillus molecular biology: from genomics to probiotics. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, pp 95–114
Ait Seddik H, Bendali F, Cudennec B, Drider D (2017) Anti-pathogenic and Probiotic attributes of Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from feces of Algerian infants and adults. Res Microbiol 168(3):244–254
Mann GV, Spoerry A (1974) Studies of a surfactant and cholesteremia in the Maasai. Am J Clin Nutr 27:464–469
Bendali F, Kerdouche K, Hamma-Faradji S, Drider D (2017) In vitro and in vivo cholesterol lowering ability of Lactobacillus pentosus KF923750. Benef Microbes 8(2):271–280. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2016.0121
Del Re B, Sgorbati B et al (2000) Auto-aggregation and hydrophobicity of 13 strains of Bifidobacterium longum. Lett Appl Microbiol 31:438
Lambert JM, Bongers RS, de Vos WM et al (2008) Functional analysis of four bile salt hydrolase and penicillin acylase family members in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Appl Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00137-08
Elkins CA, Moser SA, Savage DC et al (2001) Genes encoding bile salt hydrolases and conjugated bile salt transporters in Lactobacillus johnsonii 100–100 and other Lactobacillus species. Microbiology 147:3403–3412. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-147-12-3403
Corzo G, Gilliland SE (1999) Bile salt hydrolase activity of three strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Dairy Sci 82(3):472–480. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75256-2
Tanaka H, Doesburg K, Iwasaki T et al (1999) Screening of lactic acid bacteria for bile salt hydrolase activity. J Dairy Sci 82(12):2530–2535. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75506-2
Papadimitriou K, Zoumpopoulou G, Foligné B et al (2015) Discovering probiotic microorganisms: in vitro, in vivo, genetic and omics approaches. Front Microbiol 6:58. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00058
Gilliland SE, Nelson CR, Maxwell C (1985) Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl Environ Microbiol 49(2):377–381
Taranto MP, Medici M, Perdigon G et al (1998) Evidence for hypocholesterolemic effect of Lactobacillus reuteri in hypercholesterolemicmice. J Dairy Sci 81(9):2336–2340. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)70123-7
Lin SY, Ayres JW, Winkler W Jr et al (1989) Lactobacillus effects on cholesterol: in vitro and in vivo results. J Dairy Sci 72(11):2885–2899. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79439-X
Mohan JC, Arora R, Khalilullah M et al (1990) Preliminary observations on effect of Lactobacillus sporogenes on serum lipid levels in hypercholesterolemic patients. Indian J Med Res 92:431–432
Jones ML, Martoni CJ et al (2011) Cholesterol-lowering efficacy of a microencapsulated bile salt hydrolase-active Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 yoghurt formulation in hypercholesterolaemic adults. Br J Nutr 9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1998.0401
Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM (1992) The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 8:275–282
Kumar S, Taylor WR, Thornton JM et al (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874
Acknowledgement
We take this opportunity to express our profound gratitude and deep regards to Jaypee Institute of Information Technology for their kind co-operation and encouragement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khare, A., Gaur, S. Cholesterol-Lowering Effects of Lactobacillus Species. Curr Microbiol 77, 638–644 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-01903-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-01903-w