Abstract
Pseudomonas sp. P11 was isolated from the industrial wastewater sediment nearby the Daye Non-ferrous Metals Company, China. This strain possesses the ability to resist various heavy metals and efficiently precipitate arsenic. We here present a summary classification and a set of features of Pseudomonas sp. P11, together with the description of the genomic sequencing and annotation. The genomic sequence is 6,644,817 bp with a G+C content of 62.20% and contains 6143 protein-coding genes, 250 pseudo genes, and 76 tRNAs/rRNAs genes. Operons and gene clusters responsible for multiple heavy metal tolerance or detoxification were identified and accounted for the observed resistance phenotypes. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the paralogous arsenic resistant genes possess different evolutionary paths. This study provides important insights to illuminate the versatility and adaptation of this strain to the heavy metal-contaminated environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The genus Pseudomonas belongs to the family Pseudomonadaceae was originally described by Migula in 1894 [18, 26]. Members of this genus were isolated from diverse environments including soil, sediment, water, air, plants, and clinical specimens. Some of Pseudomonas species were also isolated from contaminated niches and possess chromosomal, transposon, and plasmid-mediated resistance systems to adapt the long-term exposure to toxic xenobiotics [20]. For example, Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates carry a high frequency of heavy metal resistance genes, such as copA and copB genes which are associated with resistance to copper, czcA gene which is related to resistance to the metals cadmium, zinc, and cobalt, and arsC gene encoding the arsenate reductase [9, 21]. P. putida isolates possess a large variety of determinants involved in metal(loid) homeostasis, tolerance and resistance in the genome, including the nikRABCDE putative operon that mediates uptake of nickel ions, the cusCFBA operon that determines an efflux pump for copper and silver ions, the arsenate resistance operon (ars), and the czc determinant for cobalt–zinc–cadmium resistance [1, 3]. Based on the special metabolic capacity, Pseudomonas species have been explored as candidates for the biological remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil and water [16, 17, 22].
Pseudomonas sp. P11 was isolated from wastewater sediment sample collected from Daye Non-ferrous Metals Company, China. This strain displayed high tolerance to various metal cations including arsenic, cadmium, mercury, copper, and lead, and it is also able to promote arsenic precipitation in the process of growth. In this report, we presented the genome of stain P11 with special emphasis on the genes involving in metal resistance and detoxification. These data will improve our understanding on the resistance mechanism of heavy metal in strain P11 and thus help make it a better use in the bioremediation field.
Materials and Methods
Sample Collection and Bacteria Isolation
A sediment sample was collected from a wastewater reservoir in Daye Non-ferrous Metals Company, China. 1.0 g of sediments were serially diluted and plated onto 0.1 × tryptic soy broth (TSB; Difco) agar plate containing 5 mM arsenate. The plate was incubated at 30 °C for 2 days. Bacterial strains with different morphological characteristics were isolated and purified. The purified strains were stored in glycerol stocks at − 80 °C until further use.
Phenotypic Analysis
Bacterial morphology and motility were observed under a phase contrast microscope. Gram-staining was performed as described previously [23]. Bacterial growth at different temperatures (4, 10, 20, 28, 30, 35, 37, 42 °C) and different pH values (5.0–11.0) were examined. Salt tolerance was also determined by growing the bacteria in 0.1 × TSB medium containing different concentrations of NaCl (0–10%, w/v), respectively. Oxidase activity, catalase activity, and capability to hydrolyze starch, cellulose, chitin, casein, and tyrosine were also tested as described previously [23]. Biochemical features were determined using the API kits (API 50CH and API 20E) according to the manufacturer’s instruction (BioMerieux, France).
16S rRNA Gene Amplification and Phylogenic Analysis
Genomic DNAs of bacteria were isolated using MiniBEST Bacterial Genomic DNA Extraction Kit Version 2.0 (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Tokyo, Japan). 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using the primers 27F and 1492R as described previously [12]. PCR products were gel purified and sequenced by Genscript (Nanjing, China). Pairwise sequence identities of 16S rRNA genes were calculated using the EzBioCloud server (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/) [10]. Sequences of 16S rRNA, gyrB, arsC, and aioA genes were obtained from the GenBank database. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using ClustalW [13]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using maximum-likelihood method implemented in MEGA7.0 program [11]. The topology of the tree was evaluated using the bootstrap resampling method with 1000 replicates.
Heavy Metal Resistance
The bacterial cells of strain P11 were grown on 0.1 × TSB agar plates amended with different concentrations of heavy metals to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). Heavy metals used in different concentrations included Pb (0–5 mM), Cu (0–5 mM), Hg (0–1 mM), As(III) (0–100 mM), As(V) (0–100 mM), Cd (0–5 mM), and Cr(VI) (0–10 mM). The bacterial cells were plated on each metal concentration in duplicate. Positive controls were set by growing the isolate in the absence of heavy metals under the same conditions. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 7 days and growth was confirmed by the presence of visible colonies.
DNA Extraction and Whole Genome Sequencing
Cells of strain P11 was cultivated at 30 °C in 0.1 × TSB liquid medium to mid-exponential phase. Genomic DNA was extracted from 0.5 to 1.0 g of cells using the modified method of Marmur [15]. The integrity and quality of the DNA was verified using agarose gels and the NanoDrop™ ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Biolab). The draft genome of Pseudomonas sp. P11 was sequenced at the Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) using the Illumina/Solexa HiSeq 2000 technology.
Genome Assembly and Annotation
The de novo genome of strain P11 was assembled using the Short Oligonucleotide Analysis Package (Velvet v1.2.10) with a k-mer of 55 for contig generation and scaffolding [27]. Genes in the whole genome were identified using Glimmer v3.02 [4]. The predicted CDSs were translated into amino acid sequences that were used as queries to BLAST the GenBank, Swissprot, TIGRFam, Pfam, KEGG, COG, and GO databases, respectively. These data were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation were performed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information Prokaryotic Genomes Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) and the Integrated Microbial Genomes-Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [2, 24].
Comparative Genome Analysis
Genomic data of six most closely related Pseudomonas species, including P. entomophila L48T, P. monteilii SB3078T, P. mosselii BS011T, P. plecoglossicida NyZ12T, P. soli LMG 27941T, and P. taiwanensis DSM 21245T, were obtained from the public database NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/). Together with strain P11, seven extracted protein sequences from genomes were adjusted to a prescribed format and were grouped into homologous clusters using OrthoMCL based on sequence similarity [6]. The BLAST was applied with the criterion of e-value < 1e−5, identity > 30%, and length coverage of a gene > 50%, and Markov Cluster Algorithms were employed with an inflation index of 1.2 to complete cluster analysis [5, 19]. Enriched KEGG pathway analyses of specific genes in strain P11 were performed by R packages Cluster Profiler (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/clusterProfiler.html).
Results and Discussion
Phenotypic Features
Phenotypic characterization showed that Pseudomonas sp. P11 was a Gram-staining-negative, motile, and non-sporulating bacterium. Cells were rod shaped with rounded ends and formed opalescent, opaque, moist, circular, and entire margin colonies on 0.1 × Trypticase Soy Agar plate. Strain P11 can grow at a wide range of temperatures from 4 °C to 37 °C, with the optimum of 30 °C. It can proliferate in a pH range of 6.0–8.5, and the optimum growth pH is 7.0. The strain is citrate utilization positive and negative for H2S and indole production. It produces arginine dihydrolase, tryptophane deaminase, ornithine decarboxylase, and ornithase decarboxylase, but not lysine decarboxylase, gelatinase, beta-galactosidase, and urease.
Strain P11 can produce acid from l-arabinose, d-xylose, ribose, galactose, d-fucose, gluconate, and potassium 2-ketogluconate, but not glycerin, d-arabinose, l-xylose, adonitol, glucose, fructose, sorbose, rhamnose, dulcitol, inositol, sorbital, mannital, α-methy-d-lglycoside, α-methy-d-glucoside, N-Acetylglucosamine, amygdalin, arbutin, esculin, salicine, cellobiose, maltose, lactose, saccharose, trehalose, synanthrin, loose three sugar, red versicolor alcohol, raffinose, starch, glycogen, xylitol, d-turanose, d-lyxose, d-tagatose, l-fucose, d-arabitol, l-arabitol, and potassium 5-ketogluconate.
Phylogeny of 16S rRNA and gyrB Gene Sequences
Strain P11 shared 99.79% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity with Pseudomonas hunanensis LV (GenBank accession no. JX545210) and 97.28–99.09% sequence similarity with the type strains of other recognized species of the genus Pseudomonas. The phylogenetic relationships based on 16S rRNA sequences also illustrated that strain P11 is a member of Pseudomonas genus and most closely related to Pseudomonas hunanensis LV, but phylogenetic analysis using gyrB gene sequences indicated that strain P11 was closely related to P. putida and showed 90% of the similarity to that of the type strain in the genus Pseudomonas (Fig. 1). Therefore, we could not make a conclusion about the taxonomy of strain P11. It was referred to as Pseudomonas sp. P11 at present. This stain was stored at China Center for Type Culture Collection (collection no. CCTCC M2016700).
Heavy Metal Resistance
Strain P11 displayed resistance to all heavy metal tested during the growth. The MICs reached up to 1.5 mM Pb(II), 1 mM Cu(II), 5.5 mM Hg(II), 40 mM As(III), 70 mM As(V), 3 mM (II), and 2 mM Cr(VI). The relative strong heavy metal resistance of this bacterium suggested that it evolved unique strategies to adapt to the heavy metal stresses.
Genome Properties and Comparative Genome Analysis
Based on the high tolerance to heavy metals, strain P11 was selected for DNA sequencing. The properties and statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 1. The assembly of the draft genome sequence consists of 172 scaffolds and 6,644,817 bp with 62.20% G+C content. A total of 6469 genes were predicted and of those 6143 were protein-coding genes, 250 were pseudo genes and 76 were tRNAs/rRNAs genes. A total of 4341 (67.1%) predicted proteins were functionally categorized, which allowed for the calculation of the proportions in each COG category (Table 2; Fig. 1) [7]. This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at GenBank under accession number PISL01000000.
Genome comparison among stain P11 and other 6 Pseudomonas strains revealed that these strains shared 3460 gene families (orthologous clusters), and there were 91 unique genes in strain P11 which were assigned to 42 gene families (Fig. 3). Enriched KEGG pathway analysis of these 91 genes showed that the majority of specific genes in P11 were ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporters. In bacteria, ABC transporters are of critical importance because they play roles in nutrient uptake and in secretion of toxins and antimicrobial agents. The gene annotation results showed that the genome of Pseudomonas sp. P11 possess numerous ABC transporters that mediated the uptake and secretion of nutrients, such as sugar, amino acid, peptide, metal, iron-siderophores, taurine, urea, polyamine, and vitamin ABC transporter.
Genomic Insights of Heavy Metal Resistance
The annotated genomes of Pseudomonas sp. P11 revealed the presence of various putative proteins related to multiple heavy metals resistance, including resistance proteins, transporters, and metal reductases (Fig. 4). A total of eight putative proteins conferring copper resistance, homeostasis, or transport were identified in the genome, including copper resistance protein CopB, CopC, and CopD, copper-translocating P-type ATPase CopA, Cu(I)-responsive transcriptional regulator CueR, multicopper oxidase CueO, copper chaperone CupA, and copper transporter CusS. Meanwhile, A CzcCBA operon encoding cobalt–zinc–cadmium resistance (czc) determinants, a ZnuABC transporter involved in zinc (Zn2+) homeostasis and biotolerance, and a mercury resistance operon consists of seven detoxifying enzyme genes (MerR, MerT, MerP, MerC, MerA, MerD, and MerE) were also found in the genome [14, 25].
Strain P11 carries three operons responsible for arsenic resistance and metabolism in the genome. The first operon contains four genes, including arsR, encoding the transcriptional repressor; arsB, encoding the arsenic efflux pump protein; arsC1, encoding the arsenate reductase; and arsH, encoding the organoarsenical oxidase. The second operon consists of genes encoding arsenite oxidase large unit AioA, arsenite oxidase small unit AioB and arsenate reductase ArsC2. The third operon contains five genes, including arsB, arsA, arsD (encoding the arsenic metallochaperone ArsD), arsC3, and arsR, but in which the arsB and arsA genes are separated by two genes encoding predicted CBS domain-containing protein and CoA-disulfide reductase. It’s worth noting that arsBADCR genes were encompassed by two transposase genes in the third operon, suggesting that this arsenic operon in this strain may be acquired by horizontal gene transfer. Previous research has shown that the ars operons are quite diverse in Pseudomonads such as P. aeruginosa and P. putida [1, 3, 9, 21]. Sequence analysis indicated that three ars operons in Pseudomonas sp. P11 were differentiated from previously described ars operons in other Pseudomonas species. This may imply a new strategy for arsenic metabolism in this strain.
It was widely accepted that arsenic oxidase and resistant reductase genes were horizontally transfered between bacteria species. The phylogenetic trees based on arsC and aioA gene sequences were constructed to find the potential evolution path of these genes in strain P11 (Fig. 5). The arsC1 groups with the thioredoxin-requiring arsenate reductases from Pseudomonas species. The arsC2 is more closely related to glutaredoxin-requiring arsenate reductases from some species of α-Proteobacteria, such as Azospirillum brasilense, Acetobacter pasteurianus, Rhizorhabdus dicambivorans, and Paracoccus denitrificans. The arsC3 was clustered together with the arsCs from the members of β-Proteobacteria, including Chromobacterium violaceum, Methylobacillus flagellates, Candidatus Symbiobacter mobilis, and Undibacterium parvum. The aioA shows high sequence similarity to aioA sequences found in Pseudomonas species. These results indicated that the arsC genes likely have different origins, the arsC2 and arsC3 could be transferred from α-Proteobacteria and β-Proteobacteria with the help of gene transfer events, respectively.
In addition, the genome sequence analyses revealed the presence of tellurium resistance protein TerB and TerC, chromate transporter ChrA, chromate reductase, magnesium and cobalt efflux protein CorC, Mg/Co/Ni transporter MgtE, molybdenum cofactor guanylyltransferase MobA, molybdenum ABC transporter ATP-binding protein, selenate ABC transporter, Cd(II)/Pb(II)-responsive transcriptional regulator CadR, cadmium-translocating P-type ATPase CadA, Cobalt ABC transporter CbtK and CbtL, and three heavy metal translocating P-type ATPases.
The presence of these genes in the genome suggest that Pseudomonas sp. P11 is adapted to thrive in environments with metal(loid) contamination. Meanwhile, the unique mechanism of heavy metal resistance in this bacterium suggested its great bioremediation potentials in heavy metal-contaminated environment.
Conclusions
Pseudomonas sp. P11 was isolated from industrial wastewater sediment. Our interest in studying the genome of this strain started when we found that this bacterium can tolerate several heavy metals and precipitate arsenic. In this study, we characterized the whole genome of strain P11 and revealed that numerous genes in the genome involved in the tolerance or detoxification of metal cations, including arsenic (As), mercury (Hg), zinc (Zn), cobalt (Co), cadmium (Cd), tellurium (Te), chromate (Cr), and molybdenum (Mo). We highlighted that the paralogous arsenic resistant genes probably possessed different evolutionary paths. The genome sequence provides useful information for discovering the tolerance mechanisms of microorganism in heavy metal-contaminated environment and will drive the use of Pseudomonas sp. P11 as a microbial candidate for bioremediation, such as arsenite and chromate.
References
Cánovas D, Cases I, de Lorenzo V (2003) Heavy metal tolerance and metal homeostasis in Pseudomonas putida as revealed by complete genome analysis. Environ Microbiol 5(12):1242–1256. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00463.x
Chen IA, Markowitz VM, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Szeto E, Pillay M, Ratner A, Huang J, Andersen E, Huntemann M, Varghese N, Hadjithomas M, Tennessen K, Nielsen T, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC (2017) IMG/M: integrated genome and metagenome comparative data analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res 45(D1):D507–D516. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw929
Chong TM, Yin WF, Chen JW, Mondy S, Grandclément C, Faure D, Dessaux Y, Chan KG (2016) Comprehensive genomic and phenotypic metal resistance profile of Pseudomonas putida strain S13.1.2 isolated from a vineyard soil. AMB Express 6(1):95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0269-x
Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL (2007) Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23(6):673–679. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009
Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA (2008) An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res 30(7):1575–1584
Fischer S, Brunk BP, Chen F, Gao X, Harb OS, Iodice JB, Shanmugam D, Roos DS, Stoeckert CJ Jr (2011) Using OrthoMCL to assign proteins to OrthoMCL-DB groups or to cluster proteomes into new ortholog groups. Curr Protoc Bioinformaticsr 35:6.12.1–6.12.19. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0612s35
Galperin MY, Maka COG, Rova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV (2015) Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res 43:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1223
Grant JR, Arantes AS, Stothard P (2012) Comparing thousands of circular genomes using the CGView comparison tool. BMC Genom 13:202. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-202
Hernández-Ramírez KC, Reyes-Gallegos RI, Chávez-Jacobo VM, Díaz-Magaña A, Meza-Carmen V, Ramírez-Díaz MI (2018) A plasmid-encoded mobile genetic element from Pseudomonas aeruginosa that confers heavy metal resistance and virulence. Plasmid 98:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plasmid.2018.07.003
Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M, Na H, Park SC, Jeon YS, Lee JH, Yi H, Won S, Chun J (2012) Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:716–721. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.038075-0
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 70 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33(7):1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
Lane DJ (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 115–175
Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23(21):2947–2948. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404
Lu M, Jiao S, Gao E, Song X, Li Z, Hao X, Rensing C, Wei G (2017) Transcriptome response to heavy metals in Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020 reveals new metal resistance determinants that also promote bioremediation by Medicago lupulina in metal-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 83(20):e01244-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01244-17
Marmur J, Doty P (1961) Thermal renaturation of deoxyribonucleic acids. J Mol Biol 3(5):585–594
Masood F, Malik A (2013) Current aspects of metal resistant bacteria in bioremediation: from genes to ecosystem. In: Abdul M, Elisabeth G, Madalena A (eds) Management of microbial resources in the environment. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 289–311
Ma Y, Rajkumar M, Moreno A, Zhang C, Freitas H (2017) Serpentine endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas azotoformans ASS1 accelerates phytoremediation of soil metals under drought stress. Chemosphere 185:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.135
Migula W (1894) Uber ein neues system der bakterien. Arb Bakteriol Inst Karlsruhe 1:235–238
Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Latimer K (2008) Choosing BLAST options for better detection of orthologs as reciprocal best hits. Bioinformatics 24(3):319–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm585
Peix A, Ramírez-Bahena MH, Velázquez E (2018) The current status on the taxonomy of Pseudomonas revisited: an update. Infect Genet Evol 57:106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2017.10.026
Pitondo-Silva A, Gonçalves GB, Stehling EG (2016) Heavy metal resistance and virulence profile in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from Brazilian soils. APMIS 124(8):681–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12553
Roosa S, Wauven CV, Billon G, Matthijs S, Wattiez R, Gillan DC (2014) The Pseudomonas community in metal-contaminated sediments as revealed by quantitative PCR: a link with metal bioavailability. Res Microbiol 165(8):647–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2014.07.011
Smibert RM, Krieg NR (1994) Phenotypic characterization. In: Gerhart P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR (eds) Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp 607–654
Tatusova T, Dicuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J (2016) NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44(14):6614–6624. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw569
Voica DM, Bartha L, Banciu HL, Oren A (2016) Heavy metal resistance in halophilic Bacteria and Archaea. FEMS Microbiol Lett 363(14):45. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnw146
Yang G, Han L, Wen J, Zhou S (2013) Pseudomonas guangdongensis sp. nov., isolated from an electroactive biofilm, and emended description of the genus Pseudomonas Migula 1894. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:4599–4605. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.054676-0
Zerbino DR, Birney E (2008) Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18(5):821–829. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.074492.107
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China (Grant No. 2012FFB01804).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yan, Z., Li, M., Wang, J. et al. Genome Analysis Revealing the Potential Mechanisms for the Heavy Metal Resistance of Pseudomonas sp. P11, Isolated from Industrial Wastewater Sediment. Curr Microbiol 76, 1361–1368 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01728-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01728-2