Abstract
Autoinducer-2 (AI-2) is a universal signal molecule mediating intra- and interspecies communication among bacteria. AI-2 is a byproduct of the LuxS enzyme during the catabolism of S-adenosylhomocysteine and plays critical roles in regulating various behaviors of bacteria. In our previous study, the function of LuxS in AI-2 production was verified in Streptococcus suis (SS). Decreased levels of SS biofilm formation and host-cell adherence as well as the inability to produce AI-2 were observed in SS having a luxS mutant gene. In this study, exogenous addition of a low concentration of AI-2 synthesized in vitro was found to promote biofilm formation and host-cell adherence. However, higher concentrations of AI-2 inhibited SS biofilm formation and host-cell adherence. Real-time PCR results showed that the mRNA level of virulence factors of SS biofilm, gdh, cps2, sly, and mrp increased and ef, fbps, and gapdh decreased with increasing AI-2 concentrations. These findings demonstrated that AI-2 supplemented exogenously acted as a concentration-dependent signaling molecule to regulate SS biofilm formation, host-cell adherence, and transcription levels of many virulence genes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Quorum sensing is an intercellular communication system bacteria use to indirectly monitor their own population density through signaling compounds that diffuse through the environment [13]. One of the regulatory systems is involved in the production of cell signaling molecules via luxS-based autoinducer-2 (AI-2). When the concentration of signaling molecules accumulates and reaches a threshold level, bacteria can alter their genes expression in unison and participate in diverse behaviors such as bioluminescence, biofilm formation, adherence, and virulence [26].
AI-2 synthesis is linked to the metabolism of S-adenosylmethionine. Methylation reactions frequently use S-adenosylmethionine as the methyl donor to generate S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) [19]. SAH is hydrolyzed to adenine and 4,5-dihydroxy-2,3-pentanedione (DPD) by the nucleosidase Pfs and the LuxS enzyme [14]. Upon formation, DPD spontaneously cyclizes to form at least two different interspecies communication molecules described as AI-2 [10]. A broad range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria has been suggested to harbor luxS orthologs, most of which can produce AI-2 [9, 19]. AI-2 has been shown to be involved in biofilm formation and host-cell adherence in many bacterial species.
Streptococcus suis (SS) is a zoonotic pathogen associated with a wide range of diseases in pigs, including meningitis, septicemia, pneumonia, endocarditis, and arthritis [15]. It is also a problematic zoonotic agent for humans exposed to diseased pigs or their products [15]. It has been suggested that SS infection begins with its colonization on the nasopharyngeal tissue and that the interaction of SS with respiratory tract epithelial cells is central to the initiation of the infection [22]. Different forms of interaction between SS and HEp-2, such as adhesion, invasion, and toxic effects, have been studied [7, 22, 30, 31]. SS is considered to be a normal inhabitant of a variety of ruminants, and they have the ability to form biofilms in vitro that are highly resistant to cleaning procedures [5, 16, 30]. In our previous study, we found that luxS gene is important for AI-2 production. SS mutant with ∆luxS has decreased ability in biofilm formation. It also shows lower adherence and reduced virulence [7, 31]. However, the role of AI-2, especially in SS biofilm formation, host-cell adherence, and virulence genes expression, has not been completely elucidated.
In this study, in order to find out how SS responded to AI-2, we added different concentrations of synthetic AI-2 to the media of different SS strains and evaluated biofilm formation, host-cell adherence, and virulence genes expression.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions used are listed in Table 1. The HA9801 strain was isolated from SS infected pigs in the Jiangsu Province in 1998 and was confirmed as a virulent strain [34]. The luxS mutant of HA9801 (ΔluxS) was constructed in a previous study [31]. SS strains were grown in Todd-Hewitt broth (THB) (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) medium or plated on THB agar with 5 % (v/v) sheep blood. THB medium supplemented with 1 % fibrinogen was used in the biofilm assay.
In Vitro Production of AI-2
In vitro AI-2 synthesis reactions were carried out at 37 °C, according to the method previously described [18, 31]. Briefly, AI-2 was produced by incubation with 1 mM SAH (Sigma, USA) and 1 mg/ml of purified Pfs and LuxS for 1 h at 37 °C in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 8.0. The AI-2 concentration was estimated using Ellman’s assay to quantify homocysteine concentration and measuring the absorbance at 412 nm.
Biofilm Plate Assay
SS were tested for production of biofilm using the protocol described in our previous report [31]. Briefly, an overnight culture of SS was diluted to obtain an OD600 of 0.2 into fresh medium and incubated at 37 °C for 24 or 48 h before being stained with crystal violet. After fixing of methanol and then staining was measured at 595 nm. All assays were performed in triplicate and repeated three times.
Effect of AI-2 on Biofilm Formation
Furthermore, AI-2 (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15 μM) was added to cultures of the luxS mutant and the wild-type strain. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h without agitation. To assess the time course of biofilm formation in the presence of AI-2, the plates supplemented with 2 μM AI-2 were incubated at 37 °C for 24 or 48 h without agitation. The biofilm density of different conditions was tested as described above. The experiments were done in triplicate.
The biofilm counts were evaluated according to the method described [1]. Briefly, the biofilms were formed in 12-well microtiter plates and scraped with a disposable cell scraper (BD Falcon) into fresh THB medium, and total colony forming unit (CFU) was determined by appropriate dilution and plating on THB agar.
Adherence Assay
The adherence assay was performed on HEp-2 cells (ATCC CCL23) according to our previous report [31]. Briefly, semi-confluent monolayers were washed and incubated with experimental medium (without fetal bovine serum) containing bacteria with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100 for 3 h at 37 °C with 5 % CO2. To determine the effect of AI-2 on the adhesion of SS to HEp-2 cells, various concentrations of AI-2 (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15 μM) were added to the media of wild-type strain and luxS mutant during the bacteria-cell contact. All plates were washed three times with PBS. Adherent cells were detached using 0.25 % trypsin, serially diluted tenfold in sterile PBS and plated onto THB agar plates. Results are expressed as the average number of bacteria adhering to HEp-2 cells [31]. The uninfected cells were used as the negative control in all experiments. The assay was performed at least three times.
The Influence of AI-2 on the Transcription of the Virulence Genes of SS
To test the effects of AI-2 on the transcription of the virulence genes of SS, different concentrations of AI-2 were added to SS and cultured 24 h till SS biofilm formed. Total RNA was isolated from SS grown as biofilms cells for 24 h, and qRT-PCR was carried out according the method previously described [29]. The related genes of adhesion primers used for the various RT-PCR assays are listed in Table 2.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were carried out using the Graphpad Software package (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). One way ANOVA was used in analysis of the biofilm formation and biofilm CFU counts. The mean values are shown in the figures. Where appropriate, the data were analyzed using the Student’s t test, and a value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results and Discussion
Effect of AI-2 on Biofilm Formation
Microorganisms in the environment live predominantly in biofilms, and environmental signals and bacterial interactions have been shown to be very important for biofilm formation [8]. Therefore, we studied the influence of the universal quorum-sensing signaling molecule AI-2 on SS biofilm formation and biofilm CFU counts. Various concentrations of synthetic AI-2 were added to the biofilm plate to test whether the AI-2 signal regulates SS biofilm formation. After incubating HA9801 for 24 h, we added various concentrations of AI-2 in the medium (0–2 μM). We observed an increase in the biofilm density and biofilm CFU counts. The biofilm formation and biofilm CFU counts significantly decreased when the cells were incubated with AI-2 from 2 to 15 μM (Fig. 1a, b). Similar results were found in biofilm formation associated with the ΔluxS strain, that is, low doses of AI-2 (0–4 μM) promoted biofilm formation and biofilm CFU counts in the ΔluxS strain, while high doses of AI-2 inhibited the biofilm formation and biofilm CFU counts. Adding low concentrations of AI-2 leaded to the increase of SS biofilm formation, indicating that SS was able to sense the molecule. Furthermore, the concentration of AI-2 added to the culture medium was important, given that biofilm formation occurred at an optimal AI-2 concentration and declined at higher AI-2 concentrations. This finding indicates that when the amount of AI-2 signaling molecules reaches a threshold level, the bacteria alter some of their biological properties, especially those related to biofilm formation. The concentration-dependent effect of AI-2 on biofilm formation has been reported for Bacillus cereus [2], Streptococcus oralis [24], and Mycobacterium avium [11], but higher concentration of AI-2 had different effects on SS biofilm formation, which was different from the other bacterial species. One possible explanation for this is that AI-2 might not act as the only AI in SS, because many peptides (e.g., the staphylococcal autoinducing peptides, the 2-alkyl-4-quinolones, the Phr peptides of Bacillus subtilis, and the mating pheromones of Enterococcus faecalis) was used as the autoinduce signal molecules in the most Gram-positive bacteria which play a vital role in regulating bacterial biofilm formation and virulence [32]. Instead, AI-2 produced by a different bacterial species might act as a cross-species signaling molecule or a parainducer. AI-2 has been shown to be involved in biofilm formation in many bacterial species, but the role of AI-2 has not yet been completely elucidated. Auger reported that the exogenous addition of AI-2 synthesized in vitro at concentrations from 0 to 6.8 μM had an inhibitory effect on B. cereus biofilm formation [2]. In Vibrio cholerae [17] and Eikenella corrodens [3], AI-2 was found to inhibit biofilm formation, while it was found to promote biofilm formation in Escherichia coli [12, 20], S.mutans [35], S.pneumoniae [27], S.intermedius [1], and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans [25]. Furthermore, AI-2 seems to play an important ecological role in the formation of multispecies biofilms [24, 35].
Finally, we assessed the time course of biofilm formation in the presence of 2 μM AI-2 (Fig. 1c). During 24 h of growth, HA9801 showed a significant increase in biofilm formation when AI-2 was present (P < 0.05). However, when the culture time was prolonged to 48 h, AI-2 was not able to increase biofilm formation of HA9801 (P > 0.05). Conversely, we observed a significant increase in the biofilm when the medium was supplemented with 2 μM AI-2 in ΔluxS strain after 24 and 48 h of incubation (P < 0.05). When ΔluxS was incubated with 2 μM AI-2 for 48 h, the biofilm formation ability reached the level of HA9801 strain (Fig. 1c). According to these results, the decrease in biofilm formation observed in the ΔluxS SS strain (no AI-2 supplementation) was somehow related to AI-2, because supplementing the medium with low concentrations of AI-2 increased the amount of biofilm.
Effect of AI-2 on the Ability of SS to Adhere to Host Cells
In many bacteria, adhesion to host cells is reduced when a luxS mutation is introduced in Lactobacillus acidophilus [6], Campylobacter jejuni [23], and SS [31]. However, whether the reduction was related to AI-2 has not been investigated. To determine the effect of AI-2 on the adhesion of SS to HEp-2 cells, various concentrations of synthetic AI-2 were added to the media of HA9801 (Fig. 2a) and ΔluxS (Fig. 2b) when the bacteria contacted with the cells. We found that AI-2 significantly promoted the adherence of both HA9801 and ΔluxS in the presence of a low concentration of AI-2. The maximal adherence of SS was 145 % at a concentration of 4 μM AI-2 in the HA9801 culture medium. However, as the concentration of AI-2 increased, the adherence gradually decreased; at a concentration of 15 μM AI-2, the adherence of HA9801 dropped by 51 % from its maximum value. This phenomenon was similar in the ΔluxS culture, which had a maximal SS adherence of 151 % when the concentration of AI-2 was 6 μM. At a concentration of 15 μM AI-2, the SS adherence dropped by 42 %. In general, AI-2 has been shown to control a variety of cellular processes. Bacterium can utilize its own and the other bacteria AI-2 in vivo. The changes of AI-2 populations in vivo provide a mechanism for the regulation of virulence gene expression and biofilm formation during the infection process [33], and the concrete mechanism is still to be further studied.
The Synthesis of AI-2 Effects on Transcriptional Level of Adhesion of SS
AI-2 molecule is located high in the hierarchy of regulation, as many transcriptional regulators are regulated, especially for virulence genes [21]. In our previous studies, many virulence genes were found to be affected and were significantly decreased in the luxS deletion strain [31]. But most of the investigations did not perform the effects of the addition of AI-2 on virulence genes transcriptional level. Real-time PCR results showed that the mRNA level of virulence factors of SS biofilm, including cps2, sly, and mrp, increased with increasing AI-2 concentrations (from 0 to 15 μmol). The expression of gdh only increased when incubated with 15 μM of AI-2 but not with 4 and 8 μM of AI-2. However, three virulence genes (ef, fbps, and gapdh) were downregulated from addition of 4 μmol AI-2 to 15 μmol AI-2 (Table 3). In SS, fibrinogen-binding protein (FBPS) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were previously shown to mediate cell adhesion and play important roles in bacterial infection and invasion [28]. The decreased expression levels of these two genes related of adherence maybe resulted that the biofilm formation and adherence ability decreased as the concentration of AI-2 increased. These results showed that AI-2 could regulate the expression of virulence genes of SS.
References
Ahmed NA, Petersen FC, Scheie AA (2009) AI-2/LuxS is involved in increased biofilm formation by Streptococcus intermedius in the presence of antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53(10):4258–4263. doi:10.1128/AAC.00546-09
Auger S, Krin E, Aymerich S, Gohar M (2006) Autoinducer 2 affects biofilm formation by Bacillus cereus. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(1):937–941. doi:10.1128/AEM.72.1.937-941.2006
Azakami H, Teramura I, Matsunaga T, Akimichi H, Noiri Y, Ebisu S, Kato A (2006) Characterization of autoinducer 2 signal in Eikenella corrodens and its role in biofilm formation. J Biosci Bioeng 102(2):110–117. doi:10.1263/jbb.102.110
Bassler BL, Wright M, Showalter RE, Silverman MR (1993) Intercellular signalling in Vibrio harveyi: sequence and function of genes regulating expression of luminescence. Mol Microbiol 9:773–786
Bonifait L, Grignon L, Grenier D (2008) Fibrinogen induces biofilm formation by Streptococcus suis and enhances its antibiotic resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(15):4969–4972. doi:10.1128/AEM.00558-08
Buck BL, Azcarate-Peril MA, Klaenhammer TR (2009) Role of autoinducer-2 on the adhesion ability of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Appl Microbiol 107(1):269–279. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04204.x
Cao M, Feng Y, Wang C, Zheng F, Li M, Liao H, Mao Y, Pan X, Wang J, Hu D, Hu F, Tang J (2011) Functional definition of LuxS, an autoinducer-2 (AI-2) synthase and its role in full virulence of Streptococcus suis serotype 2. J Microbiol 49(6):1000–1011. doi:10.1007/s12275-011-1523-1
Coenye T (2010) Social interactions in the Burkholderia cepacia complex: biofilms and quorum sensing. Future Microbiol 5(7):1087–1099. doi:10.2217/fmb.10.68
Decho AW, Norman RS, Visscher PT (2010) Quorum sensing in natural environments: emerging views from microbial mats. Trends Microbiol 18(2):73–80. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2009.12.008
Galloway WR, Hodgkinson JT, Bowden SD, Welch M, Spring DR (2011) Quorum sensing in Gram-negative bacteria: small-molecule modulation of AHL and AI-2 quorum sensing pathways. Chem Rev 111(1):28–67. doi:10.1021/cr100109t
Geier H, Mostowy S, Cangelosi GA, Behr MA, Ford TE (2008) Autoinducer-2 triggers the oxidative stress response in Mycobacterium avium, leading to biofilm formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(6):1798–1804. doi:10.1128/AEM.02066-07
Gonzalez Barrios AF, Zuo R, Hashimoto Y, Yang L, Bentley WE, Wood TK (2006) Autoinducer 2 controls biofilm formation in Escherichia coli through a novel motility quorum-sensing regulator (MqsR, B3022). J Bacteriol 188(1):305–316. doi:10.1128/JB.188.1.305-316.2006
Gonzalez JE, Keshavan ND (2006) Messing with bacterial quorum sensing. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70(4):859–875. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00002-06
Gopishetty B, Zhu J, Rajan R, Sobczak AJ, Wnuk SF, Bell CE, Pei D (2009) Probing the catalytic mechanism of S-ribosylhomocysteinase (LuxS) with catalytic intermediates and substrate analogues. J Am Chem Soc 131(3):1243–1250. doi:10.1021/ja808206w
Gottschalk M, Xu J, Calzas C, Segura M (2010) Streptococcus suis: a new emerging or an old neglected zoonotic pathogen? Future Microbiol 5(3):371–391. doi:10.2217/fmb.10.2
Grenier D, Grignon L, Gottschalk M (2009) Characterisation of biofilm formation by a Streptococcus suis meningitis isolate. Vet J 179(2):292–295. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.09.005
Hammer BK, Bassler BL (2003) Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol 50(1):101–104
Han XG, Lu CP (2009) Detection of autoinducer-2 and analysis of the profile of luxS and pfs transcription in Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Curr Microbiol 58(2):146–152. doi:10.1007/s00284-008-9291-9
Hardie KR, Heurlier K (2008) Establishing bacterial communities by ‘word of mouth’: luxS and autoinducer 2 in biofilm development. Nat Rev Microbiol 6(8):635–643. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1916
Herzberg M, Kaye IK, Peti W, Wood TK (2006) YdgG (TqsA) controls biofilm formation in Escherichia coli K-12 through autoinducer 2 transport. J Bacteriol 188(2):587–598. doi:10.1128/JB.188.2.587-598.2006
Krin E, Chakroun N, Turlin E, Givaudan A, Gaboriau F, Bonne I, Rousselle JC, Frangeul L, Lacroix C, Hullo MF, Marisa L, Danchin A, Derzelle S (2006) Pleiotropic role of quorum-sensing autoinducer 2 in Photorhabdus luminescens. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(10):6439–6451. doi:10.1128/AEM.00398-06
Lalonde M, Segura M, Lacouture S, Gottschalk M (2000) Interactions between Streptococcus suis serotype 2 and different epithelial cell lines. Microbiology 146(Pt 8):1913–1921
Quinones B, Miller WG, Bates AH, Mandrell RE (2009) Autoinducer-2 production in Campylobacter jejuni contributes to chicken colonization. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(1):281–285. doi:10.1128/AEM.01803-08
Rickard AH, Palmer RJ Jr, Blehert DS, Campagna SR, Semmelhack MF, Egland PG, Bassler BL, Kolenbrander PE (2006) Autoinducer 2: a concentration-dependent signal for mutualistic bacterial biofilm growth. Mol Microbiol 60(6):1446–1456. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05202.x
Shao H, Lamont RJ, Demuth DR (2007) Autoinducer 2 is required for biofilm growth of Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans. Infect Immun 75(9):4211–4218. doi:10.1128/IAI.00402-07
Vendeville A, Winzer K, Heurlier K, Tang CM, Hardie KR (2005) Making ‘sense’ of metabolism: autoinducer-2, LuxS and pathogenic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 3(5):383–396. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1146
Vidal JE, Ludewick HP, Kunkel RM, Zahner D, Klugman KP (2011) The LuxS-dependent quorum-sensing system regulates early biofilm formation by Streptococcus pneumoniae Strain D39. Infect Immun 79(10):4050–4060. doi:10.1128/IAI.05186-11
Wang K, Lu C (2007) Adhesion activity of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in a Chinese Streptococcus suis type 2 strain. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 120(5–6):207–209
Wang Y, Yi L, Wu Z, Shao J, Liu G, Fan H, Zhang W, Lu C (2012) Comparative proteomic analysis of Streptococcus suis biofilms and planktonic cells that identified biofilm infection-related immunogenic proteins. PLoS One 7(4):e33371. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033371
Wang Y, Zhang W, Wu Z, Lu C (2011) Reduced virulence is an important characteristic of biofilm infection of Streptococcus suis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 316(1):36–43. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02189.x
Wang Y, Zhang W, Wu Z, Zhu X, Lu C (2011) Functional analysis of luxS in Streptococcus suis reveals a key role in biofilm formation and virulence. Vet Microbiol 152(1–2):151–160. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.04.029
Williams P (2007) Quorum sensing, communication and cross-kingdom signalling in the bacterial world. Microbiology 153(Pt 12):3923–3938. doi:10.1099/mic.0.2007/012856-0
Winstanley C, Fothergill JL (2009) The role of quorum sensing in chronic cystic fibrosis Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. FEMS Microbiol Lett 290(1):1–9. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01394.x
Yao HCLC (1999) The identification of swine streptococcus isolates of Jiangsu province in 1998. J Nanjing Agric Univ 22:67–70
Yoshida A, Ansai T, Takehara T, Kuramitsu HK (2005) LuxS-based signaling affects Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(5):2372–2380. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.5.2372-2380.2005
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31201910), the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB518804), the Science and Technology Research Foundation of Henan Province Educational Committee (13A230261, 14A230003), Foundation for University Key Teacher by the Ministry of Education of Henan Province (2013GGJS-068), Major project of Nanjing Science and Technology Committee (201201026), Cooperative innovation fund of production-college-research of Jiangsu Province (BY2011114), the Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Yang Wang and Li Yi have contributed equally to this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Yi, L., Zhang, Z. et al. Biofilm Formation, Host-Cell Adherence, and Virulence Genes Regulation of Streptococcus suis in Response to Autoinducer-2 Signaling. Curr Microbiol 68, 575–580 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-013-0509-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-013-0509-0