Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Plasmid mobilization has been recognized as the major mechanism for horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of antibiotic-resistant Enterococcus faecalis strains capable of causing human infection [1]. An investigation of plasmid distribution in E. faecalis and an analysis of their role in the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance can contribute to revealing the differences in the properties of clinically relevant versus probiotic strains of E. faecalis. Although a large number of E. faecalis plasmids have been sequenced and characterized, very few are from probiotic strains [2].
Many native plasmids from other lactic acid bacteria, such as lactobacilli and lactococci, have been used for the design of molecular tools, especially food-grade cloning and expression vectors [3, 4]. Although many E. faecalis strains isolated from food harbor abundant natural plasmids [5], only a few have been developed into valuable tools for biotechnological applications.
Enterococcus faecalis strain ML21 (CGMCC No. 6166) was originally isolated from the koumiss produced by nomadic families of the Ili pastoral area of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, China. Susceptibility testing by the agar disk diffusion method showed that the isolate is susceptible to vancomycin and some other antibiotics (e.g., erythromycin, chloramphenicol, and ampicillin). This susceptibility is remarkably different from the vast majority of enterococci from clinical cases [6]. E. faecalis ML21 harbors a native plasmid, designated pML21. DNA sequencing on an ABI 3730XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA) showed that this plasmid is 5,598 bp in size with 32.9 % G+C, and is predicted to carry five putative open reading frames (ORFs) (Fig. 1a). Sequence analysis of the replicon region (ORF1, ORF2, and the sequence upstream of ORF1) of pML21 revealed that it is a member of the pCI305 family of plasmids, belonging to the group of lactococcal theta-type replicons [8], which differ from the rep9 family replicon plasmids that are prevalent in clinical strains of E. faecalis [2]. We therefore speculated that horizontal gene transfer might have occurred between E. faecalis ML21 and lactococcal strains in this niche, as the fermented dairy product koumiss contains a complex microbial ecological community. The plasmid also contains an ε antitoxin component of the ε/ζ-type toxin–antitoxin system (encoded by ORF5) but interestingly, no cognate toxin gene was detected on this plasmid. Based on homology blast, pML21 ORF3 was predicted to encode an abortive infection phage resistance (AIPR) protein which is often found in restriction–modification system operons. ORF3 and ORF4 were found likely to be under the control of a specific bidirectional promoter in pML21. ORF4 was predicted to encode a hypothetical MerR family transcriptional regulator protein, but its function remains unknown. The relative copy number of this plasmid was estimated to be about 137.81 ± 3.20 copies per cell, as determined by quantitative real-time PCR [9], higher than that of other closely related plasmids [10, 11].
To develop molecular tools using pML21, an Escherichia coli lactic acid bacteria shuttle vector designated pML23e was constructed (Fig. 1b). This vector was able to transform all tested lactic acid bacteria strains, including E. faecalis ML21, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363, L. lactis subsp. lactis LM0230, Lactobacillus acidophilus 05-172, Lactobacillus rhamnosus NL24, Lactobacillus paracasei L14 and Lactobacillus plantarum PC23, by electroporation as described previously [12], with some modifications (i.e. using 30 % (m/v) PEG1500 to suspend competent cells and pulse with 12.5 kV/cm). Transformation efficiencies ranged from 3.1 × 101 to 3.5 × 104 transformants per microgram plasmid DNA, supporting the use of pML23e to perform genetic manipulations in lactic acid bacteria (Table 1). Furthermore, pML23e was stably maintained in L. lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363, L. acidophilus 05-172 and L. plantarum PC23 for 100 generations without selective pressure (Table 1). Taken together, our results indicate that the newly isolated high copy number plasmid pML21 has potential for use in plasmid construction for multi-host cloning or expression shuttle vectors; such vectors might be useful for food biotechnology applications of lactic acid bacteria.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The full nucleotide sequence of pML21 has been submitted to the GenBank database and assigned accession no. JX023543.
References
Manson JM, Hancock LE, Gilmore MS (2010) Mechanism of chromosomal transfer of Enterococcus faecalis pathogenicity island, capsule, antimicrobial resistance, and other traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(27):12269–12274
Teuber M, Schwarz F, Perreten V (2003) Molecular structure and evolution of the conjugative multiresistant plasmid pRE25 of Enterococcus faecalis isolated from a raw-fermented sausage. Int J Food Microbiol 88:325–329
Lee JH, Halgerson JS, Kim JH, O’Sullivan DJ (2007) Comparative sequence analysis of plasmids from Lactobacillus delbrueckii and construction of a shuttle cloning vector. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(14):4417–4424
Emond E, Lavallée R, Drolet G, Moineau S, LaPointe G (2001) Molecular characterization of a theta replication plasmid and its use for development of a two-component food-grade cloning system for Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1700–1709
Toğay SÖ, Keskin AÇ, Açık L, Temiz A (2010) Virulence genes, antibiotic resistance and plasmid profiles of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from naturally fermented Turkish foods. J Appl Microbiol 109:1084–1092
Moritz EM, Hergenrother PJ (2007) Toxin-antitoxin systems are ubiquitous and plasmid-encoded in vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(1):311–316
Álvarez-Martín P, Belén Flórez A, Margolles A, del Solar G, Mayo B (2008) Improved cloning vectors for bifidobacteria, based on the Bifidobacterium catenulatum pBC1 replicon. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:4656–4665
Seegers JFLM, Bron S, Franke CM, Venema G, Kiewiet R (1994) The majority of lactococcal plasmids carry a highly related replicon. Microbiology 140:1291–1300
Škulj M, Okršlar V, Jalen Š, Jevševar S, Slanc P, Štrukelj B, Menart V (2008) Improved determination of plasmid copy number using quantitative real-time PCR for monitoring fermentation processes. Microb Cell Fact 7:6–18
Johnson CM, Haemig HHA, Chatterjee A, Shou HW, Weaver KE, Dunnya GM (2011) RNA-mediated reciprocal regulation between two bacterial operons is RNase III dependent. MBio 2(5):e11–e00189
Boels IC, Kranenburg RV, Kanning MW, Chong BF, de Vos WM, Kleerebezem M (2003) Increased exopolysaccharide production in Lactococcus lactis due to increased levels of expression of the NIZO B40 eps gene cluster. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(8):5029–5031
Holo H, Nes IF (1989) High-frequency transformation, by electroporation, of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris grown with glycine in osmotically stabilized media. Appl Environ Microbiol 55(12):3119–3123
Gasson MJ (1983) Plasmid complement of Streptococcus lactis NCDO712 and other lactic streptococci after protoplast-induced curing. J Bacteriol 154:1–9
Efstathiou JD, McKay LL (1977) Inorganic salts resistance associated with a lactose-fermenting plasmid in Streptococcus lactis. J Bacteriol 130:257–265
Xie Y, An HR, Hao YL, Qin QQ, Huang Y, Luo YB, Zhang LB (2011) Characterization of an anti-Listeria bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum LB-B1 isolated from koumiss, a traditionally fermented dairy product from China. Food Control 22:1027–1031
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31071507), and the National High Technology Research and Development Program (“863” Program, No. 2008AA10Z310).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zuo, F., Feng, X., Sun, X. et al. Characterization of Plasmid pML21 of Enterococcus faecalis ML21 from Koumiss. Curr Microbiol 66, 103–105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-012-0255-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-012-0255-8