Abstract
A new moderately halophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium (strain H T1 ) was enriched and isolated from a wastewater digestor in Tunisia. Cells were curved, motile rods (2–3 x 0.5 μm). Strain H T1 grew at temperatures between 22 and 43°C (optimum 35°C), and at pH between 5.0 and 9.2 (optimum 7.3–7.5). Strain H T1 required salt for growth (1–45 g of NaCl/l), with an optimum at 20–30 g/l. Sulfate, sulfite, thiosulfate, and elemental sulfur were used as terminal electron acceptors but not nitrate and nitrite. Strain H T1 utilized lactate, pyruvate, succinate, fumarate, ethanol, and hydrogen (in the presence of acetate and CO2) as electron donors in the presence of sulfate as electron acceptor. The main end-products from lactate oxidation were acetate with H2 and CO2. The G + C content of the genomic DNA was 55%. The predominant fatty acids of strain H T1 were C15:0 iso (38.8%), C16:0 (19%), and C14:0 iso 3OH (12.2%), and menaquinone MK-6 was the major respiratory quinone. Phylogenetic analysis of the small-subunit (SSU) ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequence indicated that strain H T1 was affiliated to the genus Desulfovibrio. On the basis of SSU rRNA gene sequence comparisons and physiological characteristics, strain H T1 is proposed to be assigned to a novel species of sulfate reducers of the genus Desulfovibrio, Desulfovibrio legallis sp. nov. (= DSM 19129T = CCUG 54389T).
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are anaerobic chemolithotrophic microorganisms, both bacteria and archaea (230 species of 60 genera), that can utilize sulfate as terminal electron acceptor in their energy metabolism [1, 9]. SRB are of major numerical and functional importance in many ecosystems including marine sediments, polluted environments such as anaerobic purification plants, cyanobacterial microbial mats, oil fields environments, rice fieds, deep-sea hydrothermal vents and even in human diseases [1, 9, 10, 16, 19, 22, 23].
In this study, we report on the isolation of a moderately halophilic SRB, strain H T1 , recovered from a sludge bioreactor treating wastewater in Tunisia. The characteristics of this strain suggest that it is a new species of the genus Desulfovibrio, phylogenetically related with the taxon of Desulfovibrio: (D.) desulfuricans [7], D. fairfieldensis [17], D. piger [18], and D. intestinalis [11].
Materials and Methods
Preparation of Media, Isolation and Characterization of the Microorganism
Strain H T1 was isolated from an anaerobic reactor inoculated with a mixture of two anaerobic sludges obtained from an anaerobic digestor treating urban wastewater and from Tunisian lake sediments [2].
The enrichment culture was performed in 60-ml serum bottles inoculated with 2-ml sample. The basal medium contained (per liter of distilled water): 0.3 g KH2PO4, 0.3 g K2HPO4, 1 g NH4Cl, 23 g NaCl, 3 g Na2SO4, 0.1 g KCl, 0.1 g CaCl2·2H2O, 0.5 g cysteine. HCl, 0.1 g yeast extract (Difco Laboratories), 1-ml trace mineral element solution of Widdel and Pfennig [29], and 1 ml of 0.1% resazurin. The pH was adjusted to 7.2 with 10 M KOH solution. The medium was boiled under a stream of O2-free N2 gas and cooled to room temperature. Aliquots of 5 ml were dispensed into Hungate tubes, degassed under N2–CO2 (80:20%, v/v), and subsequently sterilized by autoclaving at 110°C for 45 min. Before culture inoculation, 0.1 ml of 10% (w/v) NaHCO3, 0.1 ml of 2% (w/v) Na2S·9H2O, and 0.1 ml 15% MgCl2·6H2O were injected from sterile stock solutions into the tubes. The Hungate technique [14] was used throughout this study. A 0.5-ml aliquot of sample was inoculated into Hungate tubes containing 5 ml of basal medium and lactate (20 mM). The tubes were incubated at 37°C. To obtain pure cultures, the enrichment was subcultured several times under the same growth conditions before the isolation. For isolation, the culture was serially diluted tenfold in roll tubes (basal medium containing 1.6% agar); several colonies developed after incubation at 37°C and were picked separately. The process of serial dilution was repeated several times until the isolates were deemed to be axenic. Several strains similar in morphology and phylogeny and growing on lactate were isolated. A strain designated H T1 was selected and used for further characterization.
Morphological characteristics and purity of strain H T1 were observed with an Optiphot (Nikon) phase-contrast microscope. For transmission electron microscopy studies, cell preparations were negatively stained with sodium phosphotungstate, as previously described [8].
Growth experiments were performed in duplicate, using Hungate tubes containing basal medium. The basal medium was the same as enrichment medium with 20 mM sodium lactate as substrate; it was used to determine the pH, temperature, and NaCl concentration ranges for growth of strain H T1 . The pH of the medium was adjusted by injecting in Hungate tubes aliquots of anaerobic stock solutions of 1 M HCl (for acidic pHs), 10% NaHCO3, or Na2CO3 (for alkaline pHs). Water baths were used to obtain incubation temperatures from 15 to 55°C. For studies of NaCl requirements, NaCl was weighed directly in the tubes before the medium was dispensed. The strain was subcultured under the same experimental conditions before the growth rates were determined. Each substrate was tested in basal medium at a final concentration of 20 mM. Elemental sulfur (1% w/v), sulfate (20 mM), thiosulfate (20 mM), sulfite (2 mM), nitrate (10 mM), and nitrite (2 mM) were tested as terminal electron acceptors. H2S production was determined photometrically as colloidal CuS following the method described by Cord-Ruwisch [6].
The sensitivity of strain H T1 to three antibiotics (chloramphenicol, penicillin, and streptomycin) was tested until 500 μg/ml. Controls with ethanol (solvent for chloramphenicol) were included. The presence of spores was checked by microscopic observation of cultures and pasteurization tests performed at 80, 90, and 100°C for 10 and 20 min. End-products of lactate and pyruvate metabolism were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography (for the gaseous products) after 2 weeks of incubation at 37°C as previously described [13]. Cytochromes and desulfoviridin (dissimilatory bisulfite reductase) were determined on the crude bacterial extract according to the methods described by Postgate [24].
Bacterial growth was monitored by measuring the increase in turbidity at 580 nm by insertion of Hungate tubes into the cuvette holder of a spectrophotometer (Cary 50, Varian).
The G + C content of DNA of strain H T1 was determined at the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ), Braunschweig, Germany. DNA was isolated and purified by chromatography on hydroxyapatite using the procedure of Cashion et al. [4], and the G + C content was determined using HPLC as described by Mesbah et al. [21]. Cellular fatty acids of strain H T1 were determined from cultures in late-exponential growth phase in basal medium supplemented with lactate and sulfate. Fatty acids were extracted and analyzed by gas chromatography at the DSMZ following the method described by Vainshtein et al. [27]. Menaquinones were extracted and identified at the DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany.
DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and DNA Sequencing
The genomic DNA of strain H T1 was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Promega). The universal primers Fd1 (5′-CAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and R6 (5′-TACGGTTACCTTGTTACGAC-3′) were used to amplify the SSU rRNA gene. Direct sequencing of PCR product was performed by GATC (Germany).
The 16S rRNA gene sequence of the strain H T1 was imported into the sequence editor BioEdit version 5.0.9 [12]. Reference sequences were obtained from the Ribosomal Database Project II [20] and GenBank databases [3]. Position of sequence and alignment uncertainty were omitted from the analysis. The sequence position and pairwise evolutionary distances based on 1107 unambiguous nucleotides were computed using the method of Jukes and Cantor [15]. Dendrograms were constructed using the neighbor-joining method [25]. Its topology was also supported using the maximum-parsimony and maximum-likelihood algorithms. Confidence in the tree topology was determined by bootstrap analysis using 100 resamplings of the sequences.
Results and Discussion
The cells of strain H T1 are Gram-negative, vibrio-shaped, and slightly motile, with one polar flagellum, non-spore-forming-rods (Fig. 1), approximately 2–3 μm in length and about 0.5 μm in diameter, and they occur generally singly. Strain H T1 was mesophilic and grew at temperatures ranging from 22 to 43°C, with an optimum at 35°C. The isolate was moderately halophilic and grew in the presence of NaCl concentrations ranging from 1 to 45 g/l, with an optimum between 20 to 30 g/l. The optimum pH range for growth was 7.3–7.5 and growth occured between pH 5 and 9.2. The cells contained c-type cytochromes and desulfovidirin as dissimilatory bisulfite reductase. The isolate did not require peptides or vitamins although 0.1% biotrypcase enhanced growth. Sulfate, sulfite, thiosulfate, and elemental sulfur were utilized as terminal electron acceptors, but not nitrate and nitrite. Strain H T1 grew on lactate, pyruvate, ethanol, fumarate, succinate, and hydrogen (in the presence of acetate and CO2) as substrates in the presence of sulfate as electron acceptor. The main end-products resulting from lactate oxidation were acetate, CO2, and H2. Strain H T1 fermented fumarate and pyruvate in the absence of sulfate. The products of fumarate fermentation were succinate and acetate. The following compounds did not support growth in the presence of sulfate: glucose, fructose, mannitol, mannose, ribose, xylose, glycerol, formate, acetate, malate, propionate, butyrate, valerate, methanol, and casamino acids. In optimal growth conditions on a lactate sulfate medium, the growth rate was 0.097/h.
Ability of strain H T1 to grow in the presence of three antibiotics (penicillin, streptomycin, and chloramphenicol) was tested. Antibiotics were added separately to culture medium at different concentrations ranging from 25 to 500 μg/ml. Bacterial growth and microscopic observations after antibiotic addition showed that strain H T1 tolerated a chloramphenicol concentration up to 200 μg/ml and concentration up to 500 μg/ml for both penicillin and streptomycin. The G + C content of strain H T1 was 55 mol%. The fatty acid composition of strain H T1 is represented in Table 1. The predominant fatty acids were C15:0 iso (38.8%), C16:0 (19%), and C14:0 iso 3OH (12.2%). C15: 0 iso is also one of the major fatty acid in most species of Desulfovibrio [27]. The fatty acid composition of D. desulfuricans Essex 6 [26] showed the presence of three dominant fatty acids: C16:0 (24.1%°), C 15:0 iso (24%), and C17:1 iso (21.2%). The main difference in these two fatty acid compositions is the total absence of C17:1 iso in strain H T1 . Strain H T1 contained menaquinone MK-6 (98%) as a major component and menaquinone MK-5 (2%) as a minor component.
Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene revealed that strain H T1 was a member of the family Desulfovibrionaceae and forms a cluster with species of the genus Desulfovibrio. The highest sequence similarity was observed between strain H T1 and D. desulfuricans subsp. desulfuricans (strain Essex 6) with a similarity value of 96.00%. Strain H T1 had also D. fairfieldensis (95.61%), D. intestinalis (94.57% similarity), and D. piger (94.34% similarity) as its closest phylogenetic relatives. This relationship between strain H T1 and other closest relatives was also highlighted in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2). The 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain H T1 have been deposited in GenBank under accession number FJ225426.
Strains of Desulfovibrio species live in sediments or muds, marine environments and the digestive tract of humans or animals [1, 9, 19, 23]. Strain H T1 was isolated from an upflow anaerobic sludge bioreactor treating wastewater in Tunisia. This strain was shown to oxidize several substrates comprising lactate, pyruvate, succinate, ethanol, fumarate, and hydrogen (with acetate and CO2). It is a slightly halophile growing optimally at NaCl concentration of 2–3%. All the SRB so far examined contained menaquinones, and the number of isoprenoid units per side chain varies from five to nine [5]. The major respiratory quinone of strain H T1 was menaquinone MK-6 (98%) as it is the case in most Desulfovibrio species [5].
Due to morphological and phylogenetical characteristics, strain H T1 clearly belongs to the genus Desulfovibrio, family Desulfovibrionaceae.
Table 2 presents the comparison of metabolic and physiological characteristics between strain H T1 and four other closest relatives Desulfovibrio species (D. desulfuricans strain Essex 6, D piger, D fairfieldensis, and D intestinalis). Strain H T1 and D. piger utilized fewer substrates than did D. desulfuricans, D. fairfieldensis, and D. intestinalis. There are several important differences in the metabolic and physiological properties of strain H T1 compared to its four phylogenetically closest relatives. Taking into account its phenotypic, genotypic, and phylogenetic characteristics, we proposed to assign strain H T1 (T = type species) to a novel species of SRB of the genus Desulfovibrio, D. legallis sp. nov.
Description of Desulfovibrio legallis sp. nov
Desulfovibrio legallis, le.gal.lis in honor and in memory of the french microbiologist and biochemist Pr. Jean LeGall (Department of Biochemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, USA), who greatly stimulated research on dissimilatory sulfate reduction. Cells are strictly anaerobic, Gram-negative, vibrio-shaped, slightly motile, non-spore-forming-rods, approximately 2–3 μm in length and about 0.5–1 μm in diameter, and they occur generally singly. The temperature range for growth is 22–43°C (optimum 35°C). The optimum NaCl concentration varied between 20 and 30 g/l; the optimum pH is 7.3–7.5. Uses lactate, pyruvate, fumarate, ethanol, succinate, and hydrogen (in the presence of acetate and CO2) as electron donors in the presence of sulfate as terminal electron acceptor. Lactate is incompletely oxidized into acetate. Substrates that are not utilized include acetate, propionate, malate, valerate, formate, methanol, glycerol, mannitol, mannose, xylose, casamino acids, fructose, glucose, and ribose. Sulfate, sulfite, thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, and fumarate serve as terminal electron acceptors; nitrate and nitrite are not utilized. Desulfoviridin (as dissimilatory bisulfite reductase) and c-type cytochromes are present in the crude bacterial extract. The G + C content of DNA of strain H T1 is 55 mol %. Strain H T1 tolerates chloramphenicol (concentration of 200 μg/ml) and concentration of 500 μg/ml for penicillin and streptomycin. The predominant fatty acid is C15:0 iso (38.8%), and menaquinone MK-6 (98%) is the major respiratory quinone.
The type strain is H T1 (= DSM 19129T = CCUG 54389T) which was isolated from a sludge bioreactor treating wastewater in Tunisia.
References
Barton LL, Fauque GD (2009) Biochemistry, physiology and biotechnology of sulfate-reducing bacteria. In: Laskin A, Gadd G, Sariasiani S (eds) Advances in applied microbiology, vol 68, Chapter 2. Elsevier Inc, San Diego, pp 41–98
Ben Dhia Thabet O, Bouallagui H, Cayol JL, Ollivier B, Fardeau ML, Hamdi M (2009) Anaerobic degradation of landfill leachate using an upflow anaerobic fixed-bed reactor with microbial sulfate reduction. J Hazard Mater 167:1133–1140
Benson DA, Boguski MS, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Ouellette BF, Rapp BA, Wheeler DL (1999) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 27:12–17
Cashion P, Holder-Franklin MA, McCully J, Franklin M (1977) A rapid method for the base ratio determination of bacterial DNA. Anal Biochem 81:461–466
Collins MD, Widdel F (1986) Respiratory quinones of sulphate-reducing and sulphur-reducing bacteria: a systematic investigation. Syst Appl Microbiol 8:8–18
Cord-Ruwisch R (1985) A quick method for the determination of dissolved and precipitated sulfides in cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 4:33
Devereux R, He SH, Doyle CL, Orkland S, Stahl DA, LeGall J, Whitman WB (1990) Diversity and origin of Desulfovibrio species: phylogenetic definition of a family. J Bacteriol 172:3609–3619
Fardeau ML, Ollivier B, Patel BKC, Magot M, Thomas P, Rimbault A, Rocchiccioli AF, Garcia JL (1997) Thermotoga hypogea sp. nov., a xylanolytic, thermophilic bacterium from an oil-producing well. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:1013–1019
Fauque GD (1995) Ecology of sulfate-reducing bacteria. In: Barton LL (ed) Biotechnology handbooks: sulfate-reducing bacteria, chapter 8. Plenum Press, New York, pp 217–241
Fauque G, Ollivier B (2004) Anaerobes: the sulfate-reducing bacteria as an example of metabolic diversity. In: Bull AT (ed) Microbial diversity and bioprospecting, Chapter 17. ASM Press, Washington, pp 169–176
Fröhlich J, Sass H, Babenzien HD, Kuhnigk T, Varma A, Saxena S, Nalepa C, Pfeiffer P, König H (1999) Isolation of Desulfovibrio intestinalis sp. nov. from the hindgut of the lower termite Mastotermes darwiniensis. Can J Microbiol 45:145–152
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Haouari O, Fardeau ML, Cayol JC, Fauque G, Casiot C, Elbaz-Poulichet F, Hamdi M, Ollivier B (2008) Thermodesulfovibrio hydrogeniphilus sp. nov., a new thermophilic sulphate-reducing bacterium isolated from a Tunisian hot spring. Syst Appl Microbiol 31:38–42
Hungate RE (1969) A roll-tube method for the cultivation of strict anaerobes. In: Norris JR, Ribbons DW (eds) Methods in microbiology, vol 3B. Academic Press, New York, pp 117–132
Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp 211–232
Klouche N, Basso O, Lascourrèges JF, Cayol JC, Thomas P, Fauque G, Fardeau ML, Magot M (2009) Desulfocurvus vexinensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a sulphate-reducing bacterium isolated from a deep subsurface aquifer. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:3100–3104
Loubinoux J, Bisson-Boutelliez C, Miller N, Le Faou A (2002) Isolation of the provisionally named Desulfovibrio fairfieldensis from human periodontal pockets. Oral Microbiol Immunol 17:321–323
Loubinoux J, Valente FMA, Pereira IAC, Costa A, Grimont PAD, Le Faou A (2002) Reclassification of the only species of the genus Desulfomonas, Desulfomonas pigra, as Desulfovibrio piger comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1305–1308
Macfarlane GT, Cummings JH, Macfarlane S (2007) Sulphate-reducing bacteria and the human large intestine. In: Barton LL, Hamilton WA (eds) Sulphate-reducing bacteria. Environmental and engineered systems, chapter 18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 503–521
Maidak BL, Cole JR, Lilburn TG, Parker CT Jr, Saxman PR, Farris RJ, Garrity GM, Olsen GJ, Schmidt TM, Tiedje JM (2001) The RDP-II (Ribosomal Database Project). Nucleic Acids Res 29:173–174
Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB (1989) Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:159–167
Moura JJG, Gonzalez P, Moura I, Fauque G (2007) Dissimilatory nitrate and nitrite ammonification by sulphate-reducing eubacteria. In: Barton LL, Hamilton WA (eds) Sulphate-reducing bacteria. Environmental and engineered systems, chapter 8. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 241–264
Ollivier B, Cayol JL, Fauque G (2007) Sulphate-reducing bacteria from oil field environments and deep-sea hydrothermal vents. In: Barton LL, Hamilton WA (eds) Sulphate-reducing bacteria. Environmental and engineered systems, chapter 10. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 305–328
Postgate JR (1959) A diagnostic reaction of Desulphovibrio desulphuricans. Nature 183:481–482
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425
Ueki A, Suto T (1979) Cellular fatty acid composition of sulfate-reducing bacteria. J Gen Appl Mocrobiol 25:185–196
Vainshtein M, Hippe H, Kroppenstedt RM (1992) Cellular fatty acid composition of Desulfovibrio species and its use in classification of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol 15:554–566
Warren YA, Citron DM, Vreni Meriam C, Goldstein EJC (2005) Biochemical differentiation and comparison of Desulfovibrio species and other phenotypically similar genera. J Clin Microbiol 43:4041–4045
Widdel F, Pfennig N (1984) Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. 1. Isolation of new sulfate-reducing bacteria enriched with acetate from saline environments. Description of Desulfobacter postgatei gen. nov., sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 129:395–400
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thabet, O.B.D., Wafa, T., Eltaief, K. et al. Desulfovibrio legallis sp. nov.: A Moderately Halophilic, Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium Isolated from a Wastewater Digestor in Tunisia. Curr Microbiol 62, 486–491 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-010-9733-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-010-9733-z