Abstract
Culture-based analysis was employed in parallel with PCR amplification of 16S rDNA, coupled with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), to profile bacterial species associated with different developmental stages of the pine false webworm (PFW), Acantholyda erythrocephala, a sawfly pest responsible for incidents of severe defoliation in commercially important tree plantations in North America. Culture-based analysis revealed that Pseudomonas spp. along with Bacillus sphaericus and Arthrobacter sp. were the predominant components of the microflora of the internal organs and identified life-stage-specific associations including Photorhabdus temperata with egg and larval samples and a Janthinobacterium sp. with eonymphs. PCR-DGGE confirmed the predominance of Pseudomonas spp. and B. sphaericus in the majority of samples but did not detect Arthrobacter sp., P. temperate, or Janthinobacterium sp. In contrast, DGGE revealed the presence of a Chryseobacterium sp. as the predominant component of the PFW micoflora at all life stages, with the exception of adults. This species had been infrequently cultured, at low levels, from a limited number of samples and the existence of a possible relationship between this bacterium and the PFW had gone unnoticed using the culture-based approach. Our findings highlight the advantages of applying a dual approach to the study of microbe-insect associations and demonstrate that the benefits of one system can be used to overcome some of the limitations of the other.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Acantholyda erythrocephala, the pine false webworm (PFW), was introduced into eastern North America from Europe around 1925. Since 1981, the PFW has caused moderate to severe defoliation in saw-timber pine stands in New York state, USA, and in Ontario, Canada [2]. The PFW has six life stages: eggs, larvae, eonymph, pronymph, pupae, and adult. In spring, insects emerge from the soil and mate. Eggs remain in intimate contact with the vascular system of the plant and continue development (spring to summer). After emergence, larvae crawl down to the base of the needle and start to feed on old needle foliage and construct silken tubes (webs). Following their arboreal development, larvae drop to the ground and burrow into the soil where they develop into eonymhs. Transformation into pronymphs occurs during late summer or early autumn. Pronymphs remain underground for at least one winter (diapause), with transformation into pupae occurring at the beginning of spring [12].
Studies of the interactions between invertebrate hosts and their microflora have revealed direct bacterial involvement in nitrogen fixation, methanogenesis, cycling of organic compounds, production of pheromones, and biocide degradation [5]. Some endosymbiotic bacteria supply their hosts with nutrients, while others generate reproductive defects or protect against the development of disease [5, 6]. Traditionally, studies of insect-microbe interactions have employed culture-based methods with identification based on phenotypic, genetic, and biochemical characteristics. The limitations of such an approach are well established [1, 15] and have served to stimulate the application of culture independent methods to the study of insect-bacterial interactions [10, 17, 18].
In this study, as part of a broader investigation into sawfly population dynamics and identification of potential biological control agents, we employed both culture-based methods and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the total 16S rRNA gene fragments, in combination with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), to examine the microbial communities associated with different life stages of PFW.
Materials and Methods
Field Sampling and Rearing
From spring 2003 through summer 2004, PFW pronymphs, eonymphs, pupae and adults were collected in Bruce, Grey, and Simcoe Counties in Ontario and transported live to the Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick. Eonymphs, pronymphs, and pupae were maintained in clean sand at 4°C and were processed within 48 h of arrival. Field-caught adults were provided with potted, 3-year-old red pine trees (Pinus resinosa) for oviposition and larvae were allowed to feed on the same trees. PFW rearing was performed in the laboratory at 20°C under a 16-h light:8-h dark cycle.
Specimen Preparation
All life stages were surface cleansed with quick rinses (<1 min) in 0.25% sodium hypochlorite, then 70% ethanol, followed by a rinse in sterile distilled water, then dissected to excise internal tissues. Internal tissues from different PFW life stages—larvae (n = 25), pronymphs (n = 24), eonymphs (n = 20), pupae (n = 30), and adults (n = 4)—as well as frass and eggs in groups of 20 (n = 20), were placed in FastRNA Tubes (Savant Bio101 Inc.) containing 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2. Homogenization was conducted in a Fast Prep 120 (Bio101 Inc.) at a setting of 4 for 30 s. For bacteriological analysis duplicate 100-μL volumes were removed, serially diluted in PBS, and used as inocula for nutrient agar (NA) plates with incubation aerobically at 25°C. Plates were examined daily over 14 days, with samples of the dominant colony types subcultured to generate pure cultures.
PCR-DGGE
PCR assays were performed as previously reported [13], using DNA extracted from duplicate 200-μL aliquots of the tissue homogenates which had also been examined for culturable bacteria. The broadly conserved bacterial 16S rDNA gene primers were p515f (gccagcagccgcggtaa; E. coli positions 515–533) and p806r (ggactaccagggtatctaat; E. coli positions 806–787). For DGGE, the p515 forward primer was modified at the 5’ end with a 40-bp GC-rich clamp sequence that terminated gel migration of products within a concentration gradient of urea/formamide. Amplicons were examined by electrophoresis using 1.5% agarose gels and ethidium bromide staining. DGGE analysis of the 16S rRNA gene amplicons was undertaken as previously described [13]. Briefly, amplicons were separated in a 40–70% gradient using the DCode system (Bio-Rad) for 14 h at 80 V in 1 × Tris/Borate/EDTA (TBE) buffer at a constant temperature of 60°C. Relative mobility standards consisted of p515 (no GC clamp)/p806r PCR amplicons produced from laboratory subcultures of the dominant bacterial species cultured from the insect samples (Table 1) and identified by nucleotide sequence similarity to known 16S rDNA sequences using BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool). Gels were stained with ethidium bromide and documented with an Imagemaster digital camera and associated annotation software (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). DGGE bands of interest were extracted and sequenced as previously described [13].
Results and Discussion
In designing this study we sought to sample multiple samples over a number of months, for the specific purposes of identifying the predominant species, possible trends in terms of microbial succession during insect development, and the presence of species known to be involved in pathogenesis or symbiosis in other insects.
The levels of bacterial growth recovered from insect samples were in the range of 1.7 × 103 to 3.6 × 106 cfu mL−1. Eggs and pupae yielded the lowest bacterial counts, with the highest numbers recorded in the frass samples. We observed that many colonies recovered on nutrient agar plates showed highly similar morphologies. Yet upon subculture, as pure cultures on the same medium, it was possible to perceive a variety of distinct colony types which displayed a range of unique textural and olfactory characteristics: features that went undetected when growing on the original mixed culture plates. Given that it would have been impractical to have produced pure cultures of each individual colony, we believe it is possible that our culture-based assessment may have underestimated species diversity. Bacterial identification was performed by sequence analysis of approximately 240 nucleotides of the V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene, with a total of 17 different culturable bacterial species being identified (Table 1). Predominant species included Arthrobacter sp., Pseudomonas spp., and Bacillus sphaericus, with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Paenibacillus spp., and Pantoea agglomerans also isolated frequently (Table 3). Photorhabdus temperata was recovered from the majority (16/20) of egg and (18/25) larval samples but was absent from all other developmental stages, with the exception of a single adult specimen. An additional, apparently stage-specific association was noted for a purple pigmented Janthinobacterium sp., which was detected only in eonymph (14/20) samples. Indeed, eonymph samples consistently yielded the greatest diversity (14 of 17) of colony types (Table 3). Prior to the eonymphal molt, fully fed European pine sawfly (Neodiprion sertifer) larvae evacuate all solid matter from their gut and thereafter the insect is entirely dependent on internal mechanisms to regulate the gut environment [16]. The accumulation of solid gut material at the eonymphal molt stage has been recorded in other sawfly species of the family Diprionidae and was associated with increased growth of Enterobacter cloacae [16]. In the case of the PFW, an accumulation of stagnant material in the gut at the eonymph life stage may have provided a suitable environment for the diverse bacterial growth recorded in this study.
The banding patterns generated by a representative subset of the 123 samples analyzed by PCR-DGGE are shown in Fig. 1a and b, and the identities of the major bands are provided in Table 2. This approach confirmed the predominance of some of the species identified via culture, and identified others which were either undetected or underestimated. A minority (8/17) of the species detected by culture were also detected by PCR-DGGE (Table 3). It is pertinent to note that many of the undetected culturable species, including Serratia fonticola, Rhodococcus sp., and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, represented minor components of the culturable microflora. In contrast, Arthrobacter sp., Janthinobacterium sp., and P. temperata were recorded as major colony types in a variety of samples and their absence highlighted some of the possible limitations of PCR-DGGE community profiling [9].
Regarding egg and larval samples, major bands were identified as a Chryseobacterium species (Fig. 1a), which had been cultured at low numbers from a single larval and two pooled egg samples, and a Pseudomonas sp. (GenBank accession number AY30843), which had been frequently cultured from such samples (Table 3). In addition, Photorhabdus luminescens was detected as a strong band in most egg and larval samples (Fig. 1a), despite not having been detected by plating. Examination of later life stages revealed the continued predominance of the Chryseobacterium species (band 5; Fig. 1b) which had been isolated sporadically from pronymph, eonymph, and pupal samples at low numbers (Table 3). Yet again, Pseudomonas species were frequently detected as strong bands in these sample types (Fig. 1b). In support of the culture-based data, B. sphaericus emerged as a dominant band in the later developmental stages (band 14; Fig. 1b), while it had not been detected in either egg or larval samples (Fig. 1a and Table 3).
The majority of the species identified in this study by PCR-DGGE and culture have previously been reported in association with insects and/or plant material, an observation which supported their isolation from PFWs. In contrast, the identification of a Leptotrichia sp. and putative Eubacterium sp. in 4 of the 25 larval samples, which had been collected and processed at different times, was somewhat intriguing. These genera are most commonly associated with warm-blooded animals, although Eubacterium spp. have been isolated less frequently from plant products and soil [8, 14]. Both require anaerobic atmospheres for growth, and as such neither would have been detected using the culture method employed in our study.
The observation that a Chryseobacterium sp. was found as a dominant band in all samples, with the exception of those produced from adult insects or from frass, suggested that this bacterium was somehow benefical to the PFW. Chryseobacterium strains have been found in a variety of ecological niches including aquatic animals, soil, sewage, fresh water, marine sediments, clinical samples, and various food sources and associated with plants [3]. A feature of some Chryseobacteria spp. is their ability to resist both subzero environmental temperatures and alternating, natural freeze-thaw cycles [19]. These abilities are linked to the possession of both ice recrystallization inhibition and ice shaping activities, which promote autosurvival and may be exploited by other bacteria in the same environment to enhance thermal stress tolerance [19]. In Ontario PFW eonymphs are commonly encountered just below the soil surface, to a maximum depth of 9 cm, at times when soil temperatures are near zero [11]. Similarly, pupation occurs during periods of low soil temperatures, when ice crystals are still present in the soil [11]. Numerous insect species have developed mechanisms, e.g., production of antifreeze proteins, cryoprotectants, and extracellular ice nucleators, to tolerate subzero temperatures [4], and bacteria are involved in some of these adaptive processes [7]. Against this background, we would speculate that Chryseobacterium may play a role in enhancing thermotolerance in the PFW.
The combined results of our diphasic analysis indicated that the microflora of this insect was predominated by a limited number of species and demonstrated that some of the apparent life-stage-specific associations identified would have gone unnoticed had only culture or PCR/DGGE been used. The increasing popularity of PCR-based, culture-independent methods to the study of microbial communities is based mainly on the premise that they will help to reveal the nature of the 99% of the bacterial community which cannot be cultured on bacteriological media. Yet it is relevant to observe that, in common with culture-based methods, culture-independent techniques also suffer from a number of limitations which must be considered when interpreting the results obtained using these approaches [9].
References
Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH (1995) Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev 59:143–169
Asaro C, Allen DC (2001) History of a pine false webworm (Hymenoptera: Phamphiliidae) outbreak in northern New York. Can J Forest Res 31(1):181–185
Bernardet JF, Vancanneyt M, Matte-Taillieza O et al (2005) Polyphasic study of Chryseobacterium strains isolated from diseased aquatic animals. Syst Appl Microbiol 28:640–660
Chow SL, Nicolson SW (2004) Insect physiological ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 115–153
Dillon RJ, Dillon VM (2004) The gut bacteria of insects: non-pathogenic interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 49:71–92
Douglas AE (1998) Nutritional interactions in insect-microbial symbioses: aphids and their symbiotic bacteria Buchnera. Annu Rev Entomol 43:17–37
Duman JG (2001) Antifreeze and ice nucleator proteins in terrestrial arthropods. Annu Rev Physiol 63:327–357
Eribe E, Paster B, Caugant DA et al (2004) Genetic diversity of Leptotrichia and description of Leptotrichia goodfellowii sp. nov., Leptotrichia hofstadii sp. nov., Leptotrichia shahii sp. nov. and Leptotrichia wadei sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:583–592
Forney LJ, Zhou X, Brown CJ (2004) Molecular microbial ecology: land of the one-eyed king. Curr Opin Micro 7:210–220
Lacava PT, Parker J, Andreote FD et al (2007) Analysis of the bacterial community in glassy-winged sharpshooter heads. Entomol Res 37:261–266
Lyons DB (1988) Phenology and biometeorology of pine false webworm (Hymenoptera: Pamphilidae) and its parasitoid in Ontario. Ph.D. thesis. University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Lyons DB, Jones GC (2000) What do we know about the biology of the pine false webworm in Ontario? In: Lyons BB, Jones GC, Scarr TA (eds) Proceedings of a workshop on the pine false webworm, Acanthlyda erythrocephala (Hymenoptera: Pamphilidae). Toronto, Natural Resources Canada, pp 3–12
McIntosh D, Ji B, Forward BS et al (2008) Culture-independent characterization of the bacterial populations associated with cod (Gadus morhua L.) and live feed at an experimental hatchery facility using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Aquaculture 275:42–50
Moore WEC, Moore LVH (1986) Genus Eubacterium Prèvot 1938. In: Sneath PHA, Priest FG, Goodfellow M, Todd G (eds) Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, vol 2. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 1353–1373
Muyzer G (1999) DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol 2(3):317–322
Olofson E (2000) Aetiology of melanized inclusions in the body cavity of Neodiprion sertifer (Geoffroy) (Hym, Diprionidae) adults. J Appl Entomol 124:293–298
Reeson AF, Jankovic T, Kasper ML et al (2003) Application of 16S rDNA-DGGE to examine the microbial ecology associated with a social wasp Vespula germanica. Insect Mol Biol 12:85–91
Xiang H, Wei GF, Jia S et al (2006) Microbial communities in the larval midgut of laboratory and field populations of cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera). Can J Microbiol 52:1085–1092
Walker VK, Palmer GR, Voordouw G (2006) Freeze-thaw tolerance and clues to the winter survival of a soil community. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1784–1792
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zahner, V., Lucarotti, C.J. & McIntosh, D. Application of 16S rDNA-DGGE and Plate Culture to Characterization of Bacterial Communities Associated with the Sawfly, Acantholyda erythrocephala (Hymenoptera, Pamphiliidae). Curr Microbiol 57, 564–569 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-008-9243-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-008-9243-4