Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
Ruxolitinib, an orally bioavailable potent and selective inhibitor of Janus kinases (JAKs) 1 and 2, has been approved in Europe for the treatment of myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera.
Ruxolitinib improves disease-related constitutional symptoms, splenomegaly and overall survival in myelofibrosis. However, studies suggest that the drug exerts immunosuppressive activity and may predispose patients to infections [1].
Here, we report all the infectious adverse events (I-AEs) registered in the French Pharmacovigilance database between August 23, 2012 and August 31, 2017 with ruxolitinib as “suspect” or “interacting drug” and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) coded as “infections and infestations” with MedDRA System Organ Class (SOC).
The French Pharmacovigilance database was established in 1985 to record spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions reported to the network of 31 French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers.
In this retrospective study, based on spontaneous physicians’report, we identified 30 cases of infectious events including opportunistic infections which occurred in 26 patients; 28 were serious. The median age of patients was 69 years (range 53–89) and 54% were male. The indications of ruxolitinib were primary myelofibrosis (n = 5), secondary myelofibrosis (n = 7), unspecified myelofibrosis (n = 8), polycythemia vera (n = 3), atypical myeloproliferative neoplasm (n = 1), and graft versus host disease (n = 2). The median daily dose was 30 mg (range 10–60) unknown (UK) for two patients. No concomitant immunosuppressive therapy was mentioned. The immune status was unknown except for two patients (normal). The median time to onset was 465 days (range 98–1550) (UK for 12/26 patients). Infections were bacterial (n = 9), mycobacterial (n = 5), viral (n = 10), fungal (n = 4), protozoan (n = 1), and non specified opportunistic infection (n = 1). The most frequent pathogen identified was zoster virus (20%). Five sepsis were reported (16.6%). Ruxolitinib was discontinued in 13 and reduced in two patients (UK in 11 patients). Six deaths were reported—three due to sepsis, two multivisceral failure, and one respiratory distress.
Table 1 resumes the characteristics of infections.
Several opportunistic and non opportunistic infections, generally mild, were reported in patients treated with ruxolitinib in clinical trials and in post marketing. There have been recent isolated reports of toxoplasma retinitis, cryptococcal pneumonia and meningoencephalitis, disseminated tuberculosis, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, Klebsiella pneumoniae primary liver, and sino-orbital mucormycosis in patients receiving ruxolitinib. Treatment with ruxolitinib has also been associated with the reactivation of latent infections with hepatitis B virus, Epstein Barr virus, and herpes simplex virus [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9].
The occurrence of infections could be explained by the mechanism of action of ruxolitinib. This drug causes inhibition of the JAK signal transducer and STAT pathway. This pathway is essential for host immunity and defense. Studies suggest that ruxolitinib impaired several cytokines (IL1, IL6, TNFα, and IFN-γ), modulates dendritic cell function and T cell response, and reduces NK cell levels in myeloproliferative neoplasms patients which may lead to increased risk of or opportunistic infections or reactivation of latent infections [9–10]. Physicians must be alerted of this risk, and antimicrobial prophylaxis should to be discussed in patients at risk.
References
Yang LPH, Keating KM (2012) Ruxolitinib: In the Treatment of Myelofibrosis. Drugs 72 (16):2117–2127
Saeed I, McLornan D, Harrison CN (2017) Managing side effects of JAK inhibitors for myelofibrosis in clinical practice. Expert Rev Hematol 10(7):617–625
Abidi MZ, Haque J, Varma P and al (2016) Reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis following treatment of myelofibrosis with ruxolitinib. Case Rep Hematol Article ID 2389038
Malkan UY, Haznedaroglu IC (2017) A myelofibrosis case that develops mycobacterial infection after ruxolitinib treatment (case report). Int J Clin Exp Med 10(4):7304–7307
Pálmason R, Lindén O, Richter J (2015) EBV driven lymphoproliferative disorder associated with ruxolitinib (case-report). BMC Hematol 15:10
Cen CC, Chen YY, Huang CE (2016) Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis associated with the long-term use of ruxolitinib. Ann Hematol 95:361–362
Kusano Y, Terui Y, Ueda K and al (2016) Klebsiella pneumoniae primary liver abscess associated withruxolitinib Ann Hematol 95:1561–1562
Shen CH, Hwang CE, Chen YY and al (2014) Hepatitis B virus reactivation associated with ruxolitinib. Ann Hematol 93:1075–1076
Manduzio P (2017) Ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis: to be or not to be an immune disruptor. Ther Clin Risk Manag 13:169–177
Schönberg K, Rudolph J, Vonnahme M and al (2015) JAK Inhibition Impairs NK Cell Function in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Cancer Res 75(11):2187–2199
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sylvine, P., Thomas, S., Pirayeh, E. et al. Infections associated with ruxolitinib: study in the French Pharmacovigilance database. Ann Hematol 97, 913–914 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-018-3242-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-018-3242-8