Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Although esophageal veins are the main source of variceal bleeding due to portal hypertension, gastric varices are causative in 10–36% [1]. In the latter, variceal rupture is the most feared complication, with prevalence around 30% [2–4] and a mortality of 45–55% [2–6]. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for this indication has less favourable results than for esophageal variceal hemorrhage: success rates for controlling gastric varices range from 50–63% [6, 7] versus 81% in esophageal varices [8]. Variceal coiling requires either a percutaneous transhepatic approach (with its inherent risks), or TIPS creation to allow access. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) has been used to treat and prevent gastric variceal rupture, with bleeding control rates of 87–100%, and recurrence rates of 0–10% [6, 9, 10]. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration may potentially improve hepatopetal portal blood flow and hepatic function [6] and, compared to TIPS, provide lower cumulative rebleeding rates from gastric varices (2% at 1 year vs. 20% with TIPS) and higher cumulative survival rates (76% at 5 years vs. 40%) [11].
Splenic venous congestion may occur in association with sepsis, congestive heart failure, portal hypertension or splenic vein obstruction. However, to our knowledge, imaging findings of splenic venous congestion have not yet been reported after BRTO. We report a case of BRTO of extremely large gastric varices in the presence of partial splenoportal thrombosis, in which post procedural computed tomography (CT) appearance and clinical evolution suggested increased regional venous pressure and parenchymal splenic congestion.
Case Report
A 58-year-old man with known hepatic cirrhosis and remote alcoholism presented with increasing abdominal pain. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 12. Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) showed partially obstructing thrombus in the splenic and main portal veins, a large gastro renal shunt and gastric varices (Fig. 1). Anticoagulation for the thrombosis was contraindicated as a result of thrombocytopenia (range 20–50,000 mm−3) and surgery was discounted, given the hemorrhagic risk. Gastric variceal BRTO was attempted with goals of variceal occlusion and improvement of antegrade portal blood flow, which might thereby reduce stasis and promote spontaneous, endogenous fibrinolysis of the splenoportal thrombus [6].
Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration was performed via a transjugular venous approach (Fig. 2). A wedge venogram obtained after placement of an occlusion balloon catheter in the gastrorenal shunt, showed satisfactory shunt occlusion and collateral opacification of a left inferior phrenic vein, supplying a pericardiophrenic vein (grade 3 varices in Hirota’s classification) [6]. The left inferior phrenic vein was coil embolized. The microcatheter was redirected into the main gastric variceal outflow vein and, after retrograde catheterization of three large, tortuous varicose loops using dyna-CT imaging guidance (Siemens Axiom Artis, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) [10], satisfactory microcatheter positioning in the target gastric varices was confirmed. Ten ml of liquid sclerosant (8 ml of sodium tetradecyl sulfate 3% mixed with 2 ml of iodinated contrast) was slowly injected through the microcatheter (Fig. 2). An additional 10 ml was provided 30 min later. The occlusion balloon remained inflated for the entire procedure and until the posttreatment venogram the next morning. That study showed flow stasis and endoluminal defects filling most of the gastric varices and main draining vein, and no left renal vein or IVC thrombus extension. After discharge the next day, the patient had focal right upper quadrant pain, which gradually resolved while receiving oral analgesics. Contrast-enhanced CT obtained 1 week after BRTO (Fig. 3) showed complete thrombosis of the gastric varices and draining vein, no left renal vein thrombus, and mildly increased ascites. Ribbon-like bands of decreased splenic parenchymal enhancement were seen centered on the hilum. These were more prominent in the portal venous phase, with partial but incomplete improvement in the delayed phase. The appearance was thought to be consistent with splenic venous congestion [12] rather than arterial splenic infarcts.
Two months later, the patient was readmitted with hematemesis from esophageal varices, which were successfully treated by endoscopic banding. CECT (Fig. 4) showed interval shrinkage of the splenoportal thrombus, homogeneous splenic parenchymal enhancement, and persisting gastric variceal occlusion. Thereafter, the patient continued to develop recurrent ascites, treated by diuretics and paracentesis. He eventually underwent TIPS creation 16 months after BRTO because of refractory ascites. No splenoportal thrombus was found angiographically or on subsequent gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy was medically controlled. There have been no further issues with ascites or gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
Discussion
This case was remarkable for the extremely large gastric varices, the existence—and eventually endogenous fibrinolysis—of a partially obstructive splenoportal thrombus, and the development of heterogeneous splenic enhancement suggesting venous congestion after BRTO. Balloon occlusion of gastrorenal shunts has been shown to convert portal blood flow from hepatofugal to hepatopetal [13] and improve liver function tests [6]. Successful gastric variceal occlusion in this case may have improved hepatopetal flow around the splenoportal thrombus, thereby promoting spontaneous lysis. Patients with contraindications to TIPS (e.g., high hemorrhagic risk) might also benefit from BRTO [14–16]. Alternative management in this case could have been percutaneous transhepatic portal venous access followed by mechanical thrombectomy of the splenoportal thrombus. However, in situ thrombolysis would have had a higher hemorrhagic risk and the gastric varices and gastrorenal shunt would have persisted even after successful thrombolysis. We chose an option that would occlude the gastric varices and possibly promote both antegrade portal venous blood flow and endogenous fibrinolysis of the thrombus. Ascites and worsening of esophageal varices are common after BRTO [14, 16–18], as it increases preexisting portosystemic pressure gradients [19]. The latter occurs in 39% of cases at 3 years after BRTO and in 52% at 5 years, with variceal bleeding observed in 10–32% of patients [14, 20]. In contrast, splenic venous congestion has not been reported after BRTO. In our case, it may have been facilitated by the large varices, splenomegaly and the preexisting splenoportal thrombus. Although this thrombus might have caused some degree of sinistral portal hypertension, it is unlikely to be the only aetiology for the gastric varices: the underlying cirrhosis, ascites, and worsening esophageal varices after BRTO suggest that global portal hypertension was the dominant factor.
No single endovascular management technique is ideal for managing complex cases of portal hypertension sequelae. In patients who are not candidates for liver transplantation, combinations of these interventions should be considered. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration can be performed to eliminate the risk of gastric variceal bleeding; partial splenic embolization can reduce pancytopenia, splenomegaly, gastric variceal inflow, and portal hypertension; and TIPS provides safe shunt decompression and allows antegrade embolization of the veins feeding the varices [21]. In conclusion, splenic venous congestion is a rare but possible complication after BRTO, especially in the context of major splenomegaly. Partial splenic or portal thrombosis should not be considered to be an absolute contraindication for BRTO, as endogenous fibrinolysis may eventually occur after the procedure.
Reference
Cho SK, Shin SW, Do YS et al (2008) Development of thrombus in the major systemic and portal veins after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for treating gastric variceal bleeding: its frequency and outcome evaluation with CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:529–538
Sarin SK, Lahoti D, Saxena SP et al (1992) Prevalence, classification and natural history of gastric varices: a long-term follow-up study in 568 portal hypertension patients. Hepatology 16:1343–1349
Sarin SK, Sachdev G, Nanda R et al (1988) Endoscopic sclerotherapy in the treatment of gastric varices. Br J Surg 75:747–750
Watanabe K, Kimura K, Matsutani S et al (1988) Portal hemodynamics in patients with gastric varices. A study in 230 patients with esophageal and/or gastric varices using portal vein catheterization. Gastroenterology 95:434–440
Kim T, Shijo H, Kokawa H et al (1997) Risk factors for hemorrhage from gastric fundal varices. Hepatology 25:307–312
Hirota S, Matsumoto S, Tomita M et al (1999) Retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices. Radiology 211:349–356
Sanyal AJ, Freedman AM, Luketic VA et al (1997) The natural history of portal hypertension after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Gastroenterology 112:889–898
Papatheodoridis GV, Goulis J, Leandro G et al (1999) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt compared with endoscopic treatment for prevention of variceal rebleeding: a meta-analysis. Hepatology 30:612–622
Kanagawa H, Mima S, Kouyama H et al (1996) Treatment of gastric fundal varices by balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:51–58
Koizumi J, Hashimoto T, Myojin K et al (2010) CT-guided or C-arm CT-guided foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of gastric varices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:1583–1587
Ninoi T, Nakamura K, Kaminou T et al (2004) TIPS versus transcatheter sclerotherapy for gastric varices. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:369–376
Blomley MJ, Kormano M, Coulden R et al (1997) Splenic blood flow: evaluation with computed tomography. Acad Radiol 4:13–20
Yamagami T, Kato T, Iida S et al (2003) Change in the hemodynamics of the portal venous system after retrograde transvenous balloon occlusion of a gastrorenal shunt. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1011–1015
Cho SK, Shin SW, Lee IH et al (2007) Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices: outcomes and complications in 49 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W365–W372
Fukuda T, Hirota S, Sugimura K (2001) Long-term results of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for the treatment of gastric varices and hepatic encephalopathy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:327–336
Koito K, Namieno T, Nagakawa T, Morita K (1996) Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices with gastrorenal or gastrocaval collaterals. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:1317–1320
Cho SK, Shin SW, Yoo EY et al (2007) The short-term effects of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration, for treating gastric variceal bleeding, on portal hypertensive changes: a CT evaluation. Korean J Radiol 8:520–530
Choi YS, Lee JH, Sinn DH et al (2008) Effect of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration on the natural history of coexisting esophageal varices. J Clin Gastroenterol 42:974–979
Tanihata H, Minamiguchi H, Sato M et al (2009) Changes in portal systemic pressure gradient after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices and aggravation of esophageal varices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32:1209–1216
Hiraga N, Aikata H, Takaki S et al (2007) The long-term outcome of patients with bleeding gastric varices after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration. J Gastroenterol 42:663–672
Hashimoto T, Koizumi J, Hozawa S et al (2005) Refractory gastric varices treated by multi-endovascular and endoscopic techniques. Acta Hepatologica Japonica 46:284–289
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Janne d’Othée, B., Walker, T.G., Marota, J.J. et al. Splenic Venous Congestion after Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration of Gastric Varices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35, 434–438 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-011-0160-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-011-0160-8