Abstract
Background
Postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO) is one of the most serious adverse events resulting in deteriorated quality of life in children. Numerous studies have shown that laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces the occurrence of SBO compared with open surgery in adults. However, evidence of the advantages of laparoscopic surgery over open surgery in terms of reducing SBO is lacking in children. Fundoplication is a common abdominal procedure in children. This study was performed to compare the occurrence of SBO after laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) versus open fundoplication (OF).
Methods
Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a national inpatient database in Japan, we retrospectively identified patients aged 0–18 years who underwent LF or OF from July 2010 to March 2016. Propensity score adjustment was used to compare the occurrence of SBO between the groups.
Results
We identified 1838 eligible patients who underwent LF (n = 1362) or OF (n = 476). The median age at surgery was 4.0 and 1.5 years in the LF and OF group, respectively (P < 0.001). The median weight at admission was 11.4 and 7.5 kg, respectively (P < 0.001). Nineteen (1.4%) patients in the LF group and 13 (2.7%) in the OF group had at least one episode of SBO (P = 0.11, log-rank test). In the propensity score-adjusted Cox regression analysis, SBO was significantly less likely to occur in the LF than OF group (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.16–0.82; P = 0.01).
Conclusions
In this retrospective nationwide study, LF was significantly associated with a reduction in SBO compared with OF in children.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO) is one of the most serious adverse events that deteriorate quality of life for children. A previous study showed that SBO was associated with high mortality rates [1]. The reported incidence of SBO in children varies widely, ranging from 1 to 6% [2,3,4,5].
Numerous studies have shown that laparoscopic surgery potentially reduces SBO compared with open surgery in adults [6,7,8,9]. However, only a few pediatric studies have assessed the occurrence of SBO between laparoscopic and open surgery, and the results of previous pediatric studies are controversial. A meta-analysis and several retrospective cohort studies of intestinal malrotation showed no significant difference in the occurrence of SBO between laparoscopic and open surgery [10, 11]. A previous study suggested that laparoscopic surgery was superior to open surgery in terms of reducing SBO [12]. However, the study failed to adjust for the type of operation, patient demographics, and clinical characteristics. Another study showed that laparoscopic surgery potentially reduced SBO in pediatric appendectomy [13], but the results cannot be generalized to other abdominal operations.
Fundoplication is one of the major surgical procedures performed in children [14]. We therefore conducted a study to compare SBO after pediatric fundoplication between laparoscopic and open surgeries with adjustment for patient backgrounds using a national inpatient database in Japan.
Materials and methods
Data sources
This was a retrospective nationwide cohort study performed using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. All 82 university hospitals are obliged to participate in the database, but participation by community hospitals is voluntary. The database includes the following data: unique hospital identifiers; patients’ age, body weight, body height, and sex; diagnoses, comorbidities at admission and complications after admission recorded with text data in the Japanese language and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes [15]; procedures; length of stay; and discharge status. All discharge abstract data for each patient are recorded at discharge by the attending physicians. A previous validation study showed good sensitivity and excellent specificity of diagnoses and procedure records in the database [16].
Because of the anonymity of the patient database, informed consent was waived for the current study. Study approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at The University of Tokyo.
Patient selection
We identified pediatric patients (0–18 years old) who underwent primary laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) or open fundoplication (OF) from July 2010 to March 2016. We used the Japanese original procedure codes for these surgeries to identify children who received them. We excluded patients who underwent both LF and OF during the same hospitalization and those who were diagnosed with bowel obstruction before undergoing fundoplication.
Outcomes
The primary outcome was the occurrence of SBO, which was recorded with the ICD-10 codes K565 (intestinal adhesions with obstruction), K566 (other and unspecified intestinal obstruction), or K913 (postprocedural intestinal obstruction). We first identified all children who underwent fundoplication and then searched for a subsequent hospitalization with SBO in the same hospital.
Baseline variables
We examined patient background factors including sex, age, body weight, body height, the number of complex chronic comorbidities, concurrent gastrostomy, year of operation, and the proportion of LFs among all fundoplications at each hospital. Age was categorized into the following four groups: 0 years (neonates/infants), 1–5 years (young children), 6–12 years (older children), and 13–18 years (adolescents). Body weight was categorized into the following four groups: ≤5.0, 5.1 to 10.0, 10.1 to 30.0, and ≥30.1 kg. We categorized body height into quintiles so that the number of patients in each group was almost equal (<60, 60–75, 76–91, 92–116, and ≥117 cm). The number of complex chronic comorbidities was counted using the Pediatric Complex Chronic Conditions Classification System version 2 [17]. The number of complex chronic comorbidities was classified as 0, 1, 2, or ≥3.
Statistical analyses
We used Fisher’s exact test and the Chi-square test to compare proportions of categorical variables (such as sex), and we used the t test and Mann–Whitney U test to compare averages of continuous variables (such as age). We performed a log-rank test to compare the occurrence of SBO between the LF and OF groups.
An unadjusted comparison using observational data is often affected by confounding bias. Propensity score analyses are generally applied to control for measured confounding factors. We performed propensity score-adjusted Cox regression analysis to compare the occurrence of SBO to adjust for differences in the patient demographic characteristics and hospital characteristics between the LF and OF groups [18]. Propensity scores for undergoing LF were calculated using a logistic regression model. The predictor variables included age, sex, body weight, body height, number of complex chronic conditions, concurrent gastrostomy, year of operation, and proportion of LFs among all fundoplications at each hospital. We calculated the C-statistic to evaluate the goodness of fit.
The independent variables were the performance of LF or OF and the propensity scores. The absence of a violation of the proportional hazard assumption was determined using Schoenfeld residuals, which showed no violation of the proportional hazard assumption.
We also compared the occurrence of SBO between patients who underwent fundoplication with and without gastrostomy using Fisher’s exact test. We used a significance level of P < 0.05 for all statistical tests, and all reported P values are two-sided. All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata/MP 14.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).
Results
We identified 1853 patients who underwent primary LF and OF during the study period. We excluded patients who underwent revision surgery for fundoplication because of recurrence (n = 7), those who underwent both LF and OF during the same hospitalization (n = 1), and those who were diagnosed with bowel obstruction before fundoplication (n = 7). We thus identified 1838 eligible patients (1362 who underwent LF and 476 who underwent OF).
Table 1 shows the patient demographics. Overall, there was no significant difference between the proportions of male and female patients. The median (interquartile range) age at the time of the operation was 4.0 (1.5–9.4) years in the LF group and 1.5 (0.6–4.8) years in the OS group. The median follow-up period was 1030 (533–1511) days in the LF group and 1264 (661–1699) days in the OF group. The median body weight at admission was 11.4 (7.8–17.1) kg in the LF group and 7.5 (3.3–12) kg in the OF group (P < 0.001). The OF group had more patients with complex chronic conditions than the LF group. About 50% of the patients underwent gastrostomy with fundoplication in the LF group, and 45% of the patients underwent concurrent gastrostomy in the OF group.
Fifteen (1.1%) patients in the LF group and 11 (2.3%) in the OF group had one episode of SBO. Four (0.3%) patients in the LF group and two (0.4%) in the OF group had more than one episode of SBO. Four (0.3%) patients in the LF group and six (1.3%) in the OF group had an episode of SBO requiring surgery (Table 2). The cumulative percentages of patients with at least one episode of SBO were 1.4 and 2.7% in the LF and OF group, respectively (P = 0.11, log-rank test).
Table 3 shows the results of the propensity score-adjusted Cox regression. The C-statistic indicated that the goodness of fit of the propensity score model was 0.85. There was a significant difference in the proportion of SBO between the LF and OF groups (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.82; P = 0.01).
Table 4 shows the occurrence of SBO between fundoplication with and without gastrostomy in the LF and OF groups. In the LF group, there was a significant difference in the proportion of SBO between patients with and without gastrostomy (0.6 vs. 2.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). In the OF group, there was no significant difference in the proportion of SBO between patients with and without gastrostomy (1.9 vs. 3.4%, respectively; P = 0.40).
Discussion
This study compared SBO between children undergoing LF and OF using a large nationwide database, with adjustment for the patients’ demographic and hospitals’ characteristics. The propensity score-adjusted analysis showed that SBO was significantly less likely to occur in the LF than OF group.
Our results showed significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the groups, including age, body weight, body height, and number of complex chronic conditions. It is inappropriate to directly compare the crude proportions of SBO between the groups. Therefore, to control for confounding bias, we used propensity score-adjusted Cox regression analysis to compare the occurrence of SBO between the groups.
Several meta-analyses of SBO after colorectal surgery in adults have shown that the laparoscopic approach significantly reduced the occurrence of SBO and subsequent surgery for SBO compared with the open approach [6, 7]. Another study that adjusted for the type of operation and the patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics reported the same result [9]. However, few reports comparing the incidence of SBO after laparoscopic versus open surgery exist in the literature, and even fewer such reports focus on pediatric patients. The advantage of laparoscopic surgery in reducing SBO in children remains controversial. Prior studies on intestinal malrotation showed no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative SBO between laparoscopic and open surgery [10, 11]. Conversely, one retrospective cohort study showed that laparoscopic surgery was associated with a reduction in SBO [12]. However, the outcomes of the study were not adjusted for the type of operation or the patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics. In the present study, there were substantial discrepancies in the patients’ demographic and complex chronic conditions between the LF and OF groups. Our propensity-adjusted comparison successfully adjusted for these conditions.
Previous studies of both adult and pediatric surgery have reported that the laparoscopic approach decreased postoperative pain, the duration of hospitalization, and postoperative complications and offered better esthetic results compared with open surgery [19,20,21]. The present study is the first to show that SBO is less likely to occur after LF than OF in children.
This study also showed that concurrent gastrostomy with fundoplication was significantly associated with a lower incidence of SBO. This may be plausible because gastrostomy confines the upper abdominal cavity, preventing both intestinal volvulus and adhesion between the upper abdominal skin incision and bowel.
Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, we were not able to follow up patients across different hospitals in this database. Thus, we may have underestimated the occurrence of postoperative SBO. In Japan, however, most patients are hospitalized in the same hospital where the operation was performed. Second, we were unable to account for intraoperative conversion from the laparoscopic to open approach. However, a prior study reported that the conversion rate was very low [22]. Third, both LF and OF included various fundoplication techniques, but we could not confirm the details of the techniques used because of a lack of data. Fourth, fundoplication requires little intestinal manipulation. Future studies are needed to explore the occurrence of SBO after operations that require more intestinal manipulation (e.g., treatment of choledochal cysts, biliary atresia, and duplication of the alimentary tract).
Conclusion
In this retrospective nationwide study, LF was associated with a significantly lower incidence of SBO than was OF in children after adjustment for patient backgrounds. Our results provide new information for selective methods of fundoplication in the pediatric population.
References
Parker MC, Wilson MS, van Goor H et al (2007) Adhesions and colorectal surgery—call for action. Colorectal Dis 9(Suppl 2):66–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01342.x
Grant HW, Parker MC, Wilson MS et al (2006) Population-based analysis of the risk of adhesion-related readmissions after abdominal surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg 41:1453–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.04.023
Lautz TB, Raval MV, Reynolds M, Barsness KA (2011) Adhesive small bowel obstruction in children and adolescents: operative utilization and factors associated with bowel loss. J Am Coll Surg 212:855–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.061
Aguayo P, Ho B, Fraser JD, Gamis A, St Peter SD, Snyder CL (2010) Bowel obstruction after treatment of intra-abdominal tumors. Eur J Pediatr Surg 20:234–236. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1253401
Young JY, Kim DS, Muratore CS et al (2007) High incidence of postoperative bowel obstruction in newborns and infants. J Pediatr Surg 42:962–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.01.030 (discussion 965)
Yamada T, Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H et al (2016) Meta-analysis of the risk of small bowel obstruction following open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 103:493–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10105
Ha GW, Lee MR, Kim JH (2016) Adhesive small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 212:527–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.02.019
Klaristenfeld DD, McLemore EC, Li BH et al (2015) Significant reduction in the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after laparoscopic compared to open segmental colorectal resection. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 400:505–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1301-3
Burns EM, Currie A, Bottle A et al (2013) Minimal-access colorectal surgery is associated with fewer adhesion-related admissions than open surgery 100:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8964
Catania VD, Lauriti G, Pierro A, Zani A (2016) Open versus laparoscopic approach for intestinal malrotation in infants and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 32:1157–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3974-2
Ooms N, Matthyssens LEM, Draaisma JM et al (2016) Laparoscopic treatment of intestinal malrotation in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 26:376–381. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1554914
Molinaro F, Kaselas C, Lacreuse I et al (2009) Postoperative intestinal obstruction after laparoscopic versus open surgery in the pediatric population: a 15-year review. Eur J Pediatr Surg 19:160–162. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1202858
Kaselas C, Molinaro F, Lacreuse I, Becmeur F (2009) Postoperative bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children: a 15-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 44:1581–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.11.049
Fox D, Morrato E, Campagna EJ et al (2011) Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication in children's hospitals: 2005-2008. Pediatrics 127:872–880
WHO (2018) WHO | International Classification of Diseases. In: WHO. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/. Accessed 13 Feb 2018
Yamana H, Moriwaki M, Horiguchi H et al (2017) Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data. J Epidemiol 27:476–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.je.2016.09.009
Feudtner C, Feinstein JA, Zhong W et al (2014) Pediatric complex chronic conditions classification system version 2: updated for ICD-10 and complex medical technology dependence and transplantation. BMC Pediatr 14:199. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-199
Austin PC (2008) Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 17:1202–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1673
Nilsson G, Larsson S, Johnsson F (2002) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication. Scand J Gastroenterol 37:385–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/003655202317315999
Ru W, Wu P, Feng S et al (2016) Laparoscopic versus open Nissen fundoplication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 51:1731–1736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.07.012
Huntington JT, Lopez JJ, Mahida JB et al (2017) Comparing laparoscopic versus open Ladd’s procedure in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg 52:1128–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.046
Laje P, Blinman TA, Nance ML, Peranteau WH (2017) Laparoscopic fundoplication in neonates and young infants: failure rate and need for redo at a high-volume center. J Pediatr Surg 52:257–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.11.019
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (H29-Policy-Designated-009 and H29-ICT-Genral-004); Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (17H04141); and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (15lk1110001h0001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fujiogi, M., Michihata, N., Matsui, H. et al. Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction Following Laparoscopic or Open Fundoplication in Children: A Retrospective Analysis Using a Nationwide Database. World J Surg 42, 4112–4117 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4735-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4735-2