Abstract
As more women work outside home, a growing number of women who want to have a natural-looking double eyelid choose the method with a short healing time and less pain. Thus blepharoplasty by the nonincisional method is performed frequently. This technique uses 7-0 nylon for simple triple ring–shaped or center doubled triple ring–shaped suture, with removal of subcutaneous fat, pretarsal muscle, and orbital septum through small incisions. This prevents the possibility that the folds will be loosened. By creation of a scar adhesion between the wider portion of the dermis and the tarsal plate after debulking of the soft tissue, the nonincisional method can be applied to a very thin eyelid without any difficulty.
A retrospective review of the data for 327 patients who underwent nonincisional blepharoplasty using the debulking method from November 24, 2000 through March 9, 2003 is presented. Except for four cases, the procedures were successful. Two complications of conjunctivitis occurred, requiring removal of the buried suture, and two patients reported a mild scar.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The desire for cosmetic plastic surgery has been increased by an growing interest in aesthetics. Blepharoplasty has been one of the most popular and common procedures among Korean people. As more women work outside home, a growing number of women who want to have a natural-looking double eyelid choose the method with a short healing time and less pain. Thus blepharoplasty by the nonincisional method is performed frequently. This nonincisional method, however, can loosen the folds afterward, making it difficult to apply in cases of thick or very thin upper eyelids and risking the possibility of asymmetric folds. We therefore suggest nonincisional blepharoplasty using the debulking method.
Materials and Methods
Between October 2000 and March 2003, 327 patients underwent nonincisional blepharoplasty using the debulking method at the Lee Young-Joon Aesthetic Clinic. The mean age of the patients was 22 years (range, 18–47 years). All the patients were women, and the purpose for the surgery was cosmetic in all cases. The choice of whether the incision or nonincision method would be used was based on the age of the patient, the amount of subcutaneous fat, and the desire of the patient.
Technique for Surgery
The height of the fold was determined according to the desire of the patient, as expressed in an interview with the physician. In general, the chosen height of the fold was 4 to 8 mm. If necessary, intravenous midazolam was administrated for sedation, and local anesthesia was achieved by infiltrating 2% lidocaine with epinephrine solution into the incisional region of the upper eyelids. Depending on the results of the two-point forceps test (Fig. 1), only two small incisions (<3 mm) were made before surgery on the skin of the upper eyelids when the double eyelids formed the line more naturally. Three to four small incisions were made when there was difficulty in forming the inner or outer line with a no.11 blade.
To make the scar adhesion, pretarsal soft tissues (muscle, preseptal fat, and septum) were debulked with fine-tipped bipolar electrocautery and small scissors (Figs. 2 and 3). The lid then was everted, and a 7-0 nylon suture was inserted through the conjunctiva, entering and exiting at opposite points by the use of simple triple ring–shaped or center doubled triple ring–shaped continuous buried suture ligation methods (Fig. 4). The two ends of the suture were tied, and the knot was placed deep in the orbicularis oculi muscle. A single 7-0 black silk was used to close the small incisions. Open dressing was used with application of antibiotic ointment. The skin sutures were removed 3 days after surgery (Fig. 5).
Result
A total of 327 patients underwent nonincisional blepharoplasty using the debulking method, and the patients were satisfied with the result except in four cases. In two of these cases, the buried suture should have been removed because of conjunctivitis. In the other two cases, the patients reported a mild scar. There were no revisional operations to correct loosening of a double fold or asymmetry. Fortunately, there also were no conventional complications such as corneal injury or cyst formation. The follow-up periods ranged from 2 months to 2 years (mean, 13 months) (Figs. 6 and 7).
Discussion
Blepharoplasty, used to make a double fold, is the most common cosmetic procedure performed on young oriental adults [1]. Statistically, only 30% to 60% of Asian people are born with double eye folds [2, 3, 5, 6, 8]. The methods of blepharoplasty can be classified as incisional or nonincisional. According to Shirakabe et al. [7], the nonincisional technique was first announced by Mikamo of Japan in 1896. These authors reported that the three-stitch technique with silk thread created a double eyelid margin that was 6 to 8 mm from the cilia. The depth was determined when the stitches were removed 2 to 6 days postoperatively. Since their first report, there have been numerous reports on the nonincisional blepharoplasty.
Currently, patients prefer the nonincisional method because of its advantages such as noninvasiveness, less scar, shorter operating time, early return life activities, and the like. However, the nonincisional techniques still have some problems, although various suturing techniques are yielding good results. For example, the double fold may loosen over time. This usually results when the dermal insertions of the levator muscle disappear. That is, the degree of scar adhesion created for the artificial insertion of the levator muscle becomes small or nonexistent.
In 1962, Uchida et al. [8] claimed that it is very important to fix the tarsal plate to the skin of the eyelid. In conventional nonincisional blepharoplasty, two or three points of scar adhesion are created or there is dependence on string force alone. With time, however, its whole area is too small to sustain its function as a dermal insertion. According to Homma et al. [4], approximately 1% of the patients who have undergone nonincisional blepharoplasty lose their double fold within 1 year after surgery, and about 3% of the patients lose it within 5 years.
Our technique uses 7-0 nylon for the simple triple ring–shaped or center doubled triple ring–shaped suture after removal of the pretarsal muscle, orbital septum, and subcutaneous fat through small incisions. The removal of the soft tissue prevents the possible loosening of the folds after the nonincisional procedure by the creation of scar adhesion between the wider portion of the dermis and the tarsal plate. Thus, this method can be applied to a thin eyelid without any difficulty. In addition, debulking of the soft tissue prevents jeopardization of the suturing effect by migration of excessive orbital fat to the area of fixation in the puffy eyelid. Post surgical assessment was based on the surgeon’s assessment and patient’s degree of satisfaction.
Oriental blepharoplasty requires careful preoperative consultation with each patient as well as thorough discussion of goals and anticipated results. Satisfactory results for most of our patients prompted us to report this method. We hope this debulking method can complement the existing nonincisional method.
References
K Boo-chai (1969) ArticleTitleSome aspects of plastic surgery in orientals. Br J Plast Surg 22 60–69 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCaC2c%2FgslI%3D Occurrence Handle4887038
L Fernandez (1960) ArticleTitleDouble eyelid operation in the oriental in Hawaii. Plast Reconstr Surg 25 257–264 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CC%2BC2c3nsl0%3D Occurrence Handle13822307
Y Hiraga (1980) ArticleTitleThe double eyelid operation and augmentation rhinoplasty in the oriental patient. Clin Plast Surg 7 553–587 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi6C1cjhsFU%3D Occurrence Handle7226718
K Homma Y Mutou H Mutou M Hideo E Kyori F Tatsuya (2000) ArticleTitleIntradermal stitch blepharoplasty for orientals: does it disappear? Aesthet Plast Surg 24 289–291 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002660010048 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvosVymtQ%3D%3D
Y Kim J Kwon K Oh (2000) ArticleTitleBlepharoplasty through three small incisions. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 27 195–198
T Onizuka M Iwanami (1984) ArticleTitleBlepharoplasty in Japan. Aesthet Plast Surg 8 97–100 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiuB2sjhsF0%3D
Y Shirakabe T Kinugasa M Kawata T Kishimoto T Shirakabe (1985) ArticleTitleThe double eyelid operation in Japan: its evolution as related to cultural change. Ann Plast Surg 15 224–241 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimC3c7ntFE%3D Occurrence Handle3909898
J Uchida (1962) ArticleTitleA surgical procedure for blepharoptosis vera and for pseudoblepharoptosis orientalis. Br J Plast Surg 15 271–276 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CC2C3MrgsVQ%3D Occurrence Handle13923412
Acknowledgments
We thank professor Se-Min Baek, M.D. who has advised and imported to us a profound and comprehensive knowledge of the aesthetic surgery.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, YJ., Baek, RM. & Chung, WJ. Nonincisional Blepharoplasty Using the Debulking Method. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 27, 434–437 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-3096-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-3096-9