Abstract
Sexual steroids can play an important role as life-history organizers. In males, high circulating testosterone levels induce physiological/behavioral costs and benefits, leading to trade-offs. However, studies simultaneously testing the impact of these levels in both fitness components (survival and fecundity) during lifetime are scarce and limited to wild birds. To determine the mortality causes or hormonal manipulation impacts on male fertility is, nonetheless, a difficult task in free-ranging animals that could be easier in captivity. We longitudinally monitored captive red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa) and exposed males to high exogenous testosterone levels, anti-androgens, or a control treatment during each breeding period throughout their lives. Theory predicts that individuals maintaining high androgen levels should obtain higher fitness returns via reproduction, but suffer reduced longevity. Testosterone-treated male partridges, accordingly, lived shorter compared to controls, since they were more prone to die from a natural bacterial infection. However, the same birds seemed to have a lower capacity to fertilize eggs, probably due to endocrine feedback reducing testicular mass. These results show that exogenous testosterone can exert unpredicted effects on fitness parameters. Therefore, caution must be taken when drawing conclusions from non-fully controlled experiments in the wild. Males treated with the androgen-receptor blocker flutamide did not outlive controls as predicted by the life-history trade-off theory, but their mates laid eggs with higher hatching success. The latter could be due to mechanisms improving sperm quality/quantity or influencing maternal investment in egg quality. Testosterone receptor activity/amount could thus be as relevant to fitness as testosterone levels.
Significance statement
It has repeatedly been hypothesized that high testosterone levels induce a cost in terms of reduced lifetime reproductive success. This can be due to reduced fecundity or via shorter lifespan. This is, however, only supported by a handful of studies, mostly in wild birds. We tested this in captive male red-legged partridges, which allowed us to determine reproductive success and mortality causes. We increased testosterone levels or blocked its action with antiandrogens throughout life. High testosterone levels reduced the survival by making birds more prone to die by infection. The eggs produced by their mates also showed lower hatching success, a probable manipulation artifact that should be considered in avian studies in the wild. Interestingly, the androgen-receptor blocker flutamide increased lifetime hatching success compared to controls, suggesting that androgen receptor amounts/activity are even more relevant to fitness than testosterone levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The role of the circulating levels of androgens, particularly testosterone (T), on individual lifespan has been broadly studied in mammalian models. In humans, these hormone levels could, at least partially, explain the difference in longevity between sexes (reviewed in Brooks and Garratt 2017). Moreover, serum testosterone concentrations seem to show a quadratic inverse U-shaped relationship with human longevity (Yeap et al. 2014), and exogenous testosterone injections reduce lifespan in mice (Bronson and Matherne 1997), whereas castration extends life in rodents, primates, and humans (Asdell et al. 1967; Mills et al. 2009; Min et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2015; Kessler et al. 2016). Therefore, testosterone is thought to exert a strong effect on male survival and, hence, lifespan.
Studies addressing the impact of testosterone levels in male fitness (i.e., not only considering survival but also fecundity) from an evolutionary point of view, however, are scarce and mostly restricted to avian species (but see Mills et al. 2009 for a study in wild rodents). In the case of the longevity component of fitness, the negative impact of sustaining high circulating testosterone levels on survival is well-supported by several studies in wild birds, where males subcutaneously implanted with exogenous testosterone (T-males hereafter) showed lower return rates (Dufty 1989; Nolan et al. 1992; Reed et al. 2006). Moreover, in red grouse Lagopus scoticus, similar experiments but involving radio-tracking monitoring (higher accuracy of survival estimation) detected a significant effect of testosterone implants on overwinter survival (Moss et al. 1994; Mougeot et al. 2005a). In the case of the fecundity component of fitness, also in red grouse, the testosterone treatment seems to indirectly increase reproductive success by allowing males to obtain better territories that favor overwinter survival (Moss et al. 1994). Some studies, however, suggest that testosterone could instead impair reproductive success. In both dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) and red grouse, authors suggested that an impairment of reproductive success was, at least partially, due to a potential suppressing effect of testosterone on parental care (Raouf et al. 1997; Reed et al. 2006; Martínez-Padilla et al. 2014a).
Most of the studies manipulating and testing the impact of high testosterone levels, however, involved only a short time period, since the implants usually run last only a few weeks or months. This procedure may contrast with scenarios where individuals experience high testosterone levels during repeated periods throughout a lifetime, probably as a consequence of high competitiveness in some populations (e.g., Mougeot et al. 2005a; Martínez-Padilla et al. 2014a). These scenarios could deeply affect the fitness outcomes of testosterone-mediated life-history trade-offs but have rarely been addressed in experimental setups.
To our knowledge, only the dark-eyed junco model has provided information in this regard. Among the many classical studies on this species, only Reed et al. (2006) describes an experiment where wild males were implanted with the same testosterone treatment during consecutive years, testing how the resulting artificial phenotype (see Ketterson et al. 1996 for the concept) behaved in terms of both reproductive output and survival. They showed that prolonged exposure to high testosterone levels reduced survival, but also obtained higher reproductive success thanks to extra-pair fecundity. The authors suggested that the net effect could, however, be negative as these males produced low quality (lower body mass gain) nestlings, probably due to reduced parental care. This conclusion was based on previous works where T-treated male juncos reduced feeding rates (Ketterson and Nolan 1992; Schoech et al. 1998). However, in other studies, T-treated male juncos showed a non-significant tendency to produce fewer nestlings than control males (Ketterson et al. 1996; Raouf et al. 1997). Such a reduction could be due to a lower capacity of T-treated males to fertilize eggs. This possibility was also argued by Foerster and Kempenaers (2004) and Martínez-Padilla et al. (2014a) when detecting reduced breeding success in T-treated male blue tits Parus caeruleus and red grouse, respectively (though they did not measure hatching success).
In the present study, to test the hypothesis that testosterone level/activity may determine main fitness outcomes, male red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa) were manipulated each year during their successive breeding periods with the aim to produce different lifetime testosterone-mediated phenotypes. This experiment was performed in captivity, which assured to obtain accurate individual longevity and fecundity data. Extrapolating findings from experiments in captivity to scenarios under natural selection should be done carefully, as artificial environment conditions involve inherent limitations (see “Discussion”). However, considering these limitations, such experimental setups may ultimately clarify inconsistent findings described in wild bird studies (above). Thus, in this study, birds were treated as controls (C-males) or with either testosterone (T-males), a blocker of androgen receptors (flutamide; “F”-males), or an inhibitor of testosterone conversion to estrogens (1,4,6-androstatriene-3,17-dione; ATD) plus flutamide (FA-males) during six consecutive breeding seasons. The FA-treatment aimed to block not only the direct receptor-mediated effects of T but those derived from the estrogen properties (e.g., Badeau et al. 2005), which may increase due to the aromatization of testosterone into estradiol when androgen receptors are blocked (Soma et al. 1999). These hormone treatments would maintain steady hormonal states during reproduction, which may contrast with short-term fluctuating situations in the wild (e.g., Wingfield et al. 1990; Apfelbeck et al. 2011). In terms of predictions, in the case of the longevity fitness component, we tentatively expected that T-males should live shorter than controls, but F- and FA-males would live longer. In terms of fecundity, we predicted that females of F- and FA-males should produce less offspring, whereas T-males should produce more.
Material and methods
Experimental protocol
The study was carried out at the Dehesa Galiana experimental facility (Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos, Ciudad Real, Spain). It was conducted on captive-born, 1-year-old (born in spring, 1 May 2005), red-legged partridges that had never bred before. Here we tested the same captive birds used in Alonso-Alvarez et al. (2008) and Cantarero et al. (2019) but analyzed the impact of testosterone treatments on longevity and breeding output. All individuals were given ad libitum access to commercial pelleted food and water. We used 117 randomly formed pairs that were placed in outdoor cages (1 × 0.5 × 0.4 m, length, width, height) at ambient temperature and natural photoperiod. Three males were excluded from the analyses (also excluded in the dataset) as they escaped during the first weeks of the experiment (N = 114). The partridges were acclimatized from outdoor aviaries to cages during 15 days, before starting the experiment (April). To minimize observer bias, blinded methods were used when all data were recorded and/or analyzed.
All males were blood sampled (see details in electronic supplementary material, ESM) and weighed on 10 April 2006 and subcutaneously implanted with hormonal treatments (see below) 10 days later. These dates coincide with the period of highest circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) levels in this species (Bottoni et al. 1993), a hormone that stimulates gonad testosterone secretion (e.g., Maung and Follett 1978). The same authors reported the highest testosterone concentrations in April (Bottoni et al. 1993). At the end of the egg-laying period (June 30), implants were removed, and 10 days later (July 10), all the birds were released in two large outdoor aviaries (46 × 8.5 × 3 m; length, width, height; 391 m2 each one). These two outdoor aviaries were fully adjacent, only separated by a chain-link fence on the long side of the aviary (46 m). All treatments were represented and well-balanced in each aviary. Birds were recaptured from outdoor aviaries in mid-March of the following year. This chronogram was repeated yearly until 2011 (see also Cantarero et al. 2019). The same hormonal treatment (see below) was maintained for each bird during the lifetime. No bird was implanted in 2012 as no control bird was alive in that breeding period. Nonetheless, the survivorship of the remaining three birds (one FA- and two F-males) was recorded until January 2013 when the last (almost 8 years old) bird died. For breeding, males were paired with the same female partner in all breeding events unless the female died or was injured by male pecking and hence removed from the experiment. In these cases, the female was replaced by a yearling female from another non-manipulated captive pool. The occurrence of pecking throughout lifetime (in 20 males, i.e., 17.5%) did not differ between treatments (χ2 = 2.68, df = 3, p = 0.443; C 10.3%; F 14.3%; FA 20%; T 25.9%). Lastly, the number of different females mated with each male did not differ among treatments (range 1–6; see Cantarero et al. 2019 for statistics).
Implant treatments
All males received two subcutaneous implants (40 mm length, 1.47 mm i.d., 1.96 mm o.d.; Silastic tubing, Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA) on the back. Males were randomly assigned to one of the four treatments. C-males (n = 30) received two empty implants. T-males (n = 29) received one of the implants filled with testosterone (Steraolids Inc.; Newport, RI, USA) plus the other empty one. F-males (n = 28) received an implant filled with F (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and another empty one. Finally, FA-males (n = 30) were treated with an implant filled with F and an implant filled with ATD (Steraloids Inc.). All implants were sealed at both ends with 1 mm of silicone glue (Nusil Technology, Carpinteria, CA, USA). All males were resampled for blood 25 days and 70 days after the implant.
The length of the testosterone implant was chosen on the basis of a previous study in red-legged partridges (Blas et al. 2006) and also studies from other bird species (see ESM and Cantarero et al. 2019 for further details). In the case of the antiandrogen-implants, the same length (40 mm) was chosen by predicting a proportional relation between the volume and effect of each compound. The plasma T levels of control, F-, FA-, and T-treated birds were, respectively (i.e., mean ± SD): 0.59 ± 0.71, 0.80 ± 0.09, 2.57 ± 1.05, and 4.50 ± 1.12 ng/mL when sampled 25 after the implant date of their first breeding season, and 0.48 ± 0.24, 0.58 ± 0.63, 1.34 ± 0.44, and 3.98 ± 1.00 ng/mL when sampled 70 days after that implant date (see also ESM). Plasma T levels of T-treated males were significantly higher than those found in other groups (see Alonso-Alvarez et al. 2008 and Cantarero et al. 2019’s data repository). The F-treatment did not significantly affect testosterone (see tests in Alonso-Alvarez et al. 2008) or estradiol (S1 Fig. in Cantarero et al. 2019) concentrations. In contrast, FA-implants led to intermediate (probably endogenous) testosterone concentrations, significantly higher than those in C-males but still lower than T-male concentrations (full description in Alonso-Alvarez et al. 2008). Higher T concentrations in FA-males compared to controls have always been reported in avian studies using FA-implants (ESM for literature). Lastly, estradiol concentrations only significantly and transitorily differed between FA- and C-males (i.e., 25 days after the implant date; see Cantarero et al. 2019, S1 Fig.), probably due to ATD-blocking activity being surpassed by endogenous T levels (see ESM).
Survival and reproduction monitoring
Survival was checked at least twice weekly during the 7-year period of this study. Egg-laying was monitored by removing the eggs from cages daily. Eggs were individually identified with a pencil, weighed (± 0.1 g) and stored at 15 °C. At this temperature, embryo development is arrested (Thear 1987). Stored eggs were transferred to incubators (37.7 °C) with an egg turning system (Massalles Mod. 65-I HLC, Barcelona, Spain). Five incubation batches (mean incubation period: 24 days) were programmed throughout each breeding season. The time in storage (0–21 days) before incubation did not differ among treatments and did not affect hatchability (details in ESM). Synchronizing hatching events was necessary to allow the management of large numbers of chicks in captivity (Alonso-Alvarez et al. 2010). The eggs were candled at 20 days from the incubation start by holding an intense light above or below the egg to detect embryo development. Those not showing a clearly visible air chamber generated by embryo gases were discarded. This procedure allowed us to manage the large numbers of eggs produced (N = 2535) and to accommodate viable eggs to the hatcher machine capacity (Massalles Mod. 65-N-HLC). Each egg in the hatcher was individually introduced into a small wire cage (10 × 5 × 5 cm) with an identification label, preventing hatchlings from mixing with other individuals and losing identification. Candling was not done in 2009–2011, because all the eggs could be introduced into the hatcher. The hatcher was reviewed daily. The hatchlings were identified using numbered rings (Velcro ©, Boston MA) on the tarsus, which were substituted by metallic rings at 14 days old. The Velcro rings were fixed with staples and reviewed every 2 days to avoid damages due to tarsus growth.
Lifetime hatching success was determined as the sum of all the hatchlings produced by the mate of a male divided by the sum of all the eggs produced by that bird. The number of embryos detected by candling divided by the number of eggs (embryo occurrence rate here and thereafter) was also tested, but separately for each year during the 2006–2008 period, i.e., when the data was available (see above). Embryo or hatching success variables were not calculated for males whose mates did not produce any egg during the analyzed period. The proportion of males whose mates did not produce eggs (25 from 114 birds, 21.9 %) was equally distributed among treatments (χ2 = 0.70, df = 3, p = 0.995). Moreover, we calculated the overall chick survival probability using data of all chicks produced during the lifetime of a male by taking the total number of chicks that survived until 14 days old divided by the total number of hatchlings produced by the mate(s) of a male. All the chicks were weighed, and their size measured (tarsus length) at the hatching date and when they were 14 days old.
Effects on testis size
Seventeen males were experimentally treated and sacrificed in 2008 to test if the treatments affected testis size. These were a different subsample of yearlings (C-, F-, and FA-males: four birds per group; T-males: five birds). One F-male died 2 weeks after the implant date and was excluded from the analyses. Birds were housed and mated following the same procedure described above (same dates, housing and mating methods, etc.). Birds were sacrificed by cervical dislocation at the end of the breeding season. Testicles were immediately extracted, and their volume was calculated from the ellipsoid formulae, that is, volume = 4/3 π ab2; a = 1/2 largest diameter; b = 1/2 minor diameter (Møller 1991). The total testicular volume was the sum of volumes of the left and right testicles.
Colibacillosis outbreak
The veterinary staff of IREC regularly monitored the sanitary status of the study population. An APEC (avian pathogenic Escherichia coli) enteritis outbreak was detected in December 2008 in our facilities. Culture and identification methods for APEC were performed as previously described (Blanco et al. 1997, 1998; Dho-Moulin and Morris Fairbrother 1999; Díaz-Sánchez et al. 2013). The first experimental birds died on December 12 and the last ones died on February 12, 2009. The number of birds of each experimental treatment that were alive just before the beginning of the outbreak did not differ between the two outdoor aviaries (aviary × treatment: χ2 = 0.80, df = 3, p = 0.849), indicating that all the groups were equally exposed to a potential infection. The subsequent mortality due to the outbreak was virtually equal in both aviaries (aviary A: 11/26; aviary B: 12/26, 42% vs. 46% respectively, χ2 = 0.78, df = 1, p = 0.780). Due to the persistence of the outbreak, all the birds housed in the two outdoor aviaries were treated with antibiotics and vitamins in drinking water (Enrofloxacin 100/mg/mL; Floxaciven, Laboratorios Maimo, Barcelona). Twenty-three males died during this period.
Statistical analyses
Analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0 (SPSS, Inc.) and SAS 9.4 version (SAS Institute Inc). Log-rank tests (Mantel-Cox) were used to analyze differences in survival of partridge males between treatments. Fourteen individuals died due to different accidents or their date of death could not be established precisely during the 7 years of the study (see ESM). The survivorship of these birds until their last record was considered as censored data. The sample sizes of censored vs. non-censored individuals were unbiased among treatments (χ2 = 3.216, df = 3, p = 0.360). The total number of eggs, hatchlings or 14-day old survivor chicks, as well as embryo occurrence rate, total hatching success, and chick survivorship, showed distributions that could not be normalized. To overcome this limitation, non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis (K-W) and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparing groups. Instead, egg mass and offspring mass and size were normally distributed or normalized by log-transformation, being tested using one-way ANOVAs. The total testicular volume was analyzed using both non-parametric tests due to the lack of normality and low sample sizes. Finally, the survival of birds during the E. coli outbreak was tested by means of a chi-squared test.
Results
Survival
There was no effect of the hormonal treatment on survival when the four experimental groups were tested in the same model (log-rank test χ2 = 2.329, df = 3, p = 0.127, Fig. 1). However, paired comparisons of the survival function indicated that mortality was significantly higher in T-males when compared to C-males (Table 1). Figure 1 shows a dramatic survival decline in T-males when the third year of life is surpassed. This coincides with the 2008–2009 colibacillosis outbreak described in “Methods” (see the arrow in Fig. 1).
The proportion of birds that died during the outbreak (December 12, 2008–February 12, 2009) differed among treatments (χ2 = 8.227, df = 3, p = 0.042). Forty-two birds were still alive just before the outbreak (C 12, F 10, FA 10; T 10 birds). T-males showed 90% mortality during the outbreak period, whereas controls, F- and FA-birds reported 33%, 60%, and 40%, respectively. Pairwise comparisons showed that the survival of T-males was lower than that of C- and FA-males (both p < 0.020). The number of surviving males per experimental treatment just before the start of the outbreak did not differ between the two outdoor aviaries (χ2 = 0.483, df = 3, p = 0.923), thus suggesting no link to a particular aviary. Moreover, survival tests performed just before the start of the outbreak also did not show significant differences among treatments (i.e., these log-rank tests assigned all the deaths registered after December 12, 2008, as censored data; χ2 = 1.694, df = 3, p = 0.381). Similarly, pairwise comparisons between treatments just before the outbreak did not show differences among treatments (all log-rank tests p > 0.20).
Reproductive output
Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics of the lifetime reproductive output for each treatment group. The total number of eggs did not vary among treatments (K-W test, χ2 = 0.408, p = 0.939). However, the total number of hatchlings and 14-day-old chicks, as well as lifetime hatching success, differed significantly among treatments (all K-W tests, p < 0.01; Table 2). We found no difference among treatments neither in the mean mass of eggs, hatchlings, and 14-day-old chicks nor in their mean size (tarsus length) (all one-way ANOVA, p > 0.15). The lack of differences here indicates that male treatment did not affect female fecundity (i.e., the number of eggs laid) nor the quality of the offspring produced (i.e., total chick survivorship or egg and chick measures). Instead, results point to an effect on male fertility or embryo development. When pairwise comparisons were made for lifetime hatching success, T-males showed dramatically low hatching rates (Fig. 2; mean 16%) as compared to other groups (range of means 38–58%; all pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests, p < 0.04). Interestingly, F-males showed significantly higher lifetime hatching success than controls (U 146, p = 0.038) and similar to FA-birds (Mann-Whitney U test, U = 217, p = 0.216; see also Fig. 2).
When analyses are run for each year separately, the number of eggs produced by the mate(s) of a male did not differ among treatments (all years K-W tests, p > 0.27). However, the hatching success varied among experimental groups (see also S1 Fig. in ESM, including parametric statistics). The negative impact of the T-treatment on hatching success was more evident after the first implanting year (i.e., after 2006), whereas F- and FA-males showed higher hatching success than the other groups only during the first breeding season. Accordingly, the hatching success differed among groups in 2006 (K-W test, χ2 = 16.15, df = 3, p = 0.001), but not between T- and C-males (Mann-Whitney U test, U = 12.05, p = 0.477). F- and FA-males showed higher hatching success (mean: 56% and 47%, respectively) than controls (23%; Mann-Whitney U tests, p = 0.013 and 0.054) and T-males (9.3%; both p < 0.014). In 2007, the hatching success among groups showed a different pattern: the difference among treatments was again significant (K-W test, χ2 = 11.00, df = 3, p = 0.012), but here T- and C-males significantly differed (Mann-Whitney U test, U = 49.5, p = 0.019: means 12.5% and 49.4% respectively), whereas F- and FA-males (52% and 36.5%, respectively) did not differ from controls (both p > 0.27) but from T-males (both p < 0.038). The pattern as in 2007 was also found in 2008 (K-W test, χ2 = 14.80, df = 3, p = 0.002). Hatching success of T-males differed from other groups (all p < 0.011), but other groups did not differ among them (all p > 0.21). The three subsequent implanting breeding seasons (2009–2011) did not include T-males as none survived. In these latter years, no difference in hatching success among groups was detected (all K-W tests, p > 0.40; see also S1 Fig.).
Egg candling data
The experimental treatment also affected embryo occurrence rate during 2006–2008 (K-W tests: 2006: χ2 = 30.5, df = 3; 2007: χ2 = 21.88, df = 3; 2008: χ2 = 25.69, df = 3; all p < 0.001). Similar to hatching success, the T-treated group showed a lower embryo occurrence rate (range of means: 19–28%) than other groups (means always > 56%; all pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests, p < 0.01). Moreover, in 2006, F-males showed a higher embryo occurrence rate than controls (means: 87.5% vs. 56.6%, respectively; Mann-Whitney U test, U = 43, p = 0.001), FA-males showing a trend in the same direction (mean 72.4%; Mann-Whitney U test, U = 101, p = 0.088; other pairwise comparisons p > 0.10). The mortality between the candling and hatching date did not differ among treatments in any year (K-W tests, all p > 0.180).
Effect on testicular volume
Hormonal manipulations performed on the independent sample of birds sacrificed to assess testicular volume reported a significant effect of the treatment (K-W test, χ2 = 9.11, df = 3, p = 0.028). Pairwise comparisons showed that T-males showed a lower testicular volume than other groups (all Mann-Whitney U tests, p < 0.037; median and range in mm3; C 131.5, 113.8–2045, n = 4; F 271.2, 92.0–382.7, n = 3; FA 339.9, 65.9–962, n = 4; T 36.4, 29.8–69.8, n = 5), whereas all other comparisons were non-significant (all p > 0.68).
Discussion
Our results show that the maintenance of high circulating levels of testosterone during every breeding season of life decreased survival probability after a colibacillosis outbreak. From a reproduction-survival trade-off perspective (Stearns 1992; Zera and Harshman 2001), the negative impact on fitness was not compensated by increased lifetime fecundity as the same birds showed a lower capacity to produce hatchlings. On the other hand, the antiandrogen treatment unexpectedly enhanced male reproductive success via increased egg hatchability. As far as we know, this is the first report of such a positive effect of flutamide in any species.
The impact of high testosterone levels on survival has been reported in at least four bird species, all of them manipulated under free-living conditions (Dufty 1989; Nolan et al. 1992; Moss et al. 1994; Saino et al. 1995). Captivity does not perfectly recreate natural scenarios and imposes limitations to evolutionary inferences (e.g., Ricklefs and Cadena 2007). However, it allows us to quantify longevity with absolute confidence and also to determine the cause of death more accurately. The experimental effects on survival did not indicate accelerated aging, being mostly due to a high mortality event when birds were more than 3 years old. This event was linked to an outbreak caused by a bacterial infection (i.e., extrinsic mortality). The outbreak took place during winter, that is, 5 months after removing the implants. We should remember that birds of all the groups were housed together during winter and, hence, should have been equally exposed to the infection.
Taking into account the well-known immune-competence handicap hypothesis (i.e., Folstad and Karter 1992), an intuitive explanation is that exogenous testosterone caused immunosuppression, making partridges more prone to disease. For instance, negative relationship between circulating T levels and the capacity of blood to kill E. coli bacteria was found in male red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) (Merrill et al. 2015). Nonetheless, we should note that the implants were removed months before the outbreak. Removing T-implants just after the reproduction avoided winter mortality in wild male dark-eyed juncos (Nolan et al. 1992). In wild male red grouse, however, T-implants administered in autumn impaired body condition in the following spring, and even 1 year later, when the implants should be fully exhausted (Mougeot et al. 2005a; Martínez-Padilla et al. 2014b). Therefore, delayed immunosuppression could also be expected. Higher mortality in T-males could additionally be due to long-lasting effects on other condition components, such as the resistance to oxidative stress (Alonso-Alvarez et al. 2007), which is linked to immune response in birds (e.g., Costantini and Møller 2009). Testosterone effects on behavior could have also increased social interactions and pathogen transmission (e.g., Mougeot et al. 2005b; Escallón et al. 2017). However, the aviaries prevented to avoid social interactions, promoting a homogeneous rate of pathogen exposure.
The apparent impact of exogenous testosterone on fertility was not surprising considering avian studies reporting both increases and decreases in testicular size after a similar manipulation (review in Lofts and Murton 1973, and subsequent works such as Turek et al. 1976, 1980; Desjardin and Turek 1977; Hagen and Dziuk 1985; Kast et al. 1998; Deviche et al. 2006). It is assumed that testicular involution occurs via negative endocrine feedback (Turek et al. 1976; also Brown and Follett 1977; Desjardins and Turek 1977; Maung and Follett 1978; Kirby and Froman 2000; Fusani 2008; Vizcarra et al. 2015) but, interestingly this does apparently not arise if the androgen is provided when primary spermatozoa production is fully active (Lofts and Murton 1973 and references therein). Thus, captive male dark-eyed juncos T-implanted in mid-April did not show apparently significant effects on the ejaculate size extracted 2 months later (Kast et al. 1998). These dates coincide with our timing. We should note that partridges started to lay fecund eggs only a few days after the implanting date.
Although one could argue that our study involved non-natural testosterone levels, the concentrations of our T-males were well within the range reported for non-manipulated male red-legged partridges (Bottoni et al. 1993) and similar to levels in our C-males (Alonso-Alvarez et al. 2008). Interestingly, tiny testosterone dosages (1.5–2 mm long Silastic implants) reduced testicular mass in house sparrows Passer domesticus (Turek et al. 1976) even when not increasing circulating testosterone concentrations. This suggests that any exogenous testosterone dosage can impair male fertility. This is also supported by another experiment in male red-legged partridges where T-implants 10 mm shorter than here also induced a strong testicular involution (LP-R and J. Blas, unpublished data). Hence, the concerns raised by some authors regarding the negative influence of exogenous testosterone on male fertility (Foerster and Kempenaers 2004; Schwagmeyer et al. 2012; Martínez-Padilla et al. 2014a) are supported by our results. The negative impact of T-implants on male reproductive success underlines the inherent limitations of hormonal manipulations based on implants (Fusani 2008), which have, nonetheless, been used over decades (e.g., Wingfield 1984). An alternative approach is to test the individual capacity to increase testosterone quickly (in minutes) in response to a behavioral challenge (Wingfield 1990’s “challenge hypothesis”), which should be mediated by a rise of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion (Nelson 2005). In dark-eyed juncos, GnRH injections raised LH and, consequently, T levels for ca. 30 min, but only those males generating intermediate T concentrations obtained higher fitness returns in terms of survival and fecundity (McGlothlin et al. 2008; McGlothlin et al. 2010). Other authors have followed this approach, but lifetime fitness effects were not addressed (e.g., Apfelbeck et al. 2011; Cain and Pryke 2017; Goymann and Flores Dávila 2017).
An intriguing result of our experiment was the increased lifetime hatching success (and also embryo occurrence) experienced by eggs laid by the mates of F-treated partridges, which was more evident in F-only treated males (i.e., F-males). Several potential explanations can be proposed: (1) higher investment in egg quality among females mated to F-treated males, (2) higher copulation rates in these groups, and/or (3) higher fertilization rates. In the first case, it is well known that female birds may manipulate the egg yolk composition (lipid content, immunoglobulins, or hormone levels; Groothuis and Schwabl 2008) depending on male attractiveness, and particularly, on carotenoid-based ornamentation (e.g., Giraudeau et al. 2011; Alonso-Alvarez et al. 2012). However, to accept this, we should first assume that F altered mate attractiveness, mothers accordingly inducing maternal effects that improved embryo viability, and hence, hatching success.
In the case of higher copulation rates among F-treated males, it is well-known that testosterone, not its blockage, promotes copulation (Nelson 2005). Moreover, F did not affect copulation rates in captive Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) (Adkins-Regan and Garcia 1986; Alexandre and Balthazart 1986). Regarding increased fertility via sperm amount/quality, F leads to an impairment of spermatozoa production, either in quantity or quality, in mammalian models (Chandolia et al. 1991; Anahara et al. 2008; Lydka et al. 2011; Hejmej and Bilinska 2018). Similar findings have been reported in frogs (Bhatia et al. 2014) and fishes (Orton et al. 2018). In birds (zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata), F subcutaneously implanted from 7 days old to adulthood, reduced testes size (Grisham et al. 2007). Nonetheless, dosages and time scales in all these studies differed with respect to our experiment. Contrarily, wild male rufous-collared sparrows (Zonotrichia capensis) treated with F plus ATD developed a larger cloacal protuberance than controls (Moore et al. 2004). The cloacal protuberance accumulates sperm, its volume being positively correlated to sperm quantity (Birkhead et al. 1993). Interestingly, in all avian studies, including our experiment, the FA-treatment (i.e., not F only) increase endogenous testosterone production (Moore et al. 2004 and ESM), which may influence sexual structures such as the cited protuberance. In any event, although FA also improved hatching success, the effect was more evident among partridges only treated with F, whose T levels did not differ from controls.
Despite this literature, if we assume that higher hatching success among F-treated males was indeed mediated by increased sperm quantity or quality, what mechanism could be involved? Studies in mammalian models suggest that F may induce compensatory processes increasing sensitivity to endogenous testosterone. Thus, F treatment in mice induced thyroid hormone receptor overexpression that, in turn, unblocked the androgen receptor activity (Liao et al. 2003). Moreover, long-term exposures of human cancer cells to F can stimulate, instead of blocking, the androgen receptors (Miyamoto et al. 1998) or increase the production of these androgen receptors (Chen et al. 2003). The effect on fecundity suggests that F-treated birds should have similarly increased the number of receptors to endogenous testosterone, particularly those in Sertoli cells in charge of spermatogenesis, which have been described in birds (e.g., Leska et al. 2012; Kiezun et al. 2015). Therefore, we can tentatively suggest that a compensatory receptor-based mechanism could have improved sperm production and, consequently, lifetime hatching success in our F-male partridges.
In summary, our results as a whole suggest that those particular phenotypes maintaining high circulating levels of testosterone during the breeding season throughout their life would be negatively selected as a consequence of their predisposition to death by infections, which agrees with most accepted theory (Folstad and Karter 1992; Hau 2007). We should, nonetheless, recognize that the effect in the wild could be weaker as captivity promotes high rates of infection and transmission of pathogens. In fact, it has been shown that the prevalence of APEC infection among wild red-legged partridges is lower than that among captive non-manipulated individuals (3% vs. 11% respectively, Díaz-Sánchez et al. 2012). We should also consider that the decline in hatching success among T-males might not be the result of the reproductive vs. longevity trade-off, but a consequence of the experimental manipulation. On the other hand, antiandrogen treatment did not improve survival at the expense of reproduction but instead improved reproductive success via hatching success. If this was a consequence of a compensatory increase in the amount/activity of gonad androgen receptors (see above), we may infer that such an amount/activity could be constrained under natural conditions. To explain why such a hypothetical constraint could evolve is, however, difficult as it should theoretically rely on costs derived from androgen receptor overexpression, which are unknown. More experimental studies are, therefore, needed to test all these ideas and to clarify the role of androgen-receptor expression on breeding success and, hence, on fitness.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
References
Adkins-Regan E, Garcia M (1986) Effect of flutamide (an antiandrogen) and diethylstilbestrol on the reproductive behavior of Japanese quail. Physiol Behav 36:419–425
Alexandre C, Balthazart J (1986) Effects of metabolism inhibitors, antiestrogens and antiandrogens on the androgen and estrogen induced sexual behavior in Japanese quail. Physiol Behav 38:581–591
Alonso-Alvarez C, Bertrand S, Faivre B, Chastel O, Sorci G (2007) Testosterone and oxidative stress: the oxidation handicap hypothesis. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:819–825
Alonso-Alvarez C, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Mateo R, Chastel O, Viñuela J (2008) The oxidation handicap hypothesis and the carotenoid allocation trade-off. J Evol Biol 21:1789–1797
Alonso-Alvarez C, Pérez-Rodríguez L, García JT, Viñuela J, Mateo R (2010) Age and breeding effort as sources of individual variability in oxidative stress markers in a bird species. Physiol Biochem Zool 83:110–118
Alonso-Alvarez C, Pérez-Rodriguez L, Ferrero ME, García de-Blas E, Casas F, Mougeot F (2012) Adjustment of female reproductive investment according to male carotenoid-based ornamentation in a gallinaceous bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:731–742
Anahara R, Toyama Y, Mori C (2008) Review of the histological effects of the anti-androgen, flutamide, on mouse testis. Reprod Toxicol 25:139–143
Apfelbeck B, Stegherr J, Goymann W (2011) Simulating winning in the wild - the behavioral and hormonal response of black redstarts to single and repeated territorial challenges of high and low intensity. Horm Behav 60:565–571
Asdell SA, Doornenbal H, Joshi SR, Sperling GA (1967) The effects of sex steroid hormones upon longevity in rats. J Reprod Fertil 14:113–120
Badeau M, Adlercreutz H, Kaihovaara P, Tikkanen MJ (2005) Estrogen A-ring structure and antioxidative effect on lipoproteins. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 96:271–278
Bhatia H, Kumar A, Ogino Y, Du J, Gregg A, Chapman J, McLaughlin MJ, Iguchi T (2014) Effects of the commercial antiandrogen flutamide on the biomarkers of reproduction in male Murray rainbowfish (Melanotaenia fluviatilis). Environ Toxicol Chem 33:1098–1107
Birkhead TR, Briskie JV, Møller AP (1993) Male sperm reserves and copulation frequency in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:85–93
Blanco JE, Blanco M, Mora A, Blanco J (1997) Production of toxins (enterotoxins, verotoxins, and necrotoxins) and colicins by Escherichia coli strains isolated from septicemic and healthy chickens: relationship with in vivo pathogenicity. J Clin Microbiol 35:2953–2957
Blanco JE, Blanco M, Mora A, Jansen WH, Garcia V, Vazquez ML, Blanco J (1998) Serotypes of Escherichia coli isolated from septicaemic chickens in Galicia (northwest Spain). Vet Microbiol 61:229–235
Blas J, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Bortolotti GR, Viñuela J, Marchant TA (2006) Testosterone increases bioavailability of carotenoids: Insights into the honesty of sexual signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18633–18637
Bottoni L, Massa R, Lea RW, Sharp PJ (1993) Mate choice and reproductive success in the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa). Horm Behav 27:308–317
Bronson F, Matherne C (1997) Exposure to anabolic-androgenic steroids shortens life span of male mice. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:615–619
Brooks RC, Garratt MG (2017) Life history evolution, reproduction, and the origins of sex-dependent aging and longevity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1389:92–107
Brown NL, Follett BK (1977) Effects of androgens on the testes of intact and hypophysectomized Japanese quail. Gen Comp Endocrinol 33:267–277
Cain KE, Pryke SR (2017) Testosterone production in response to exogenous gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH challenge) depends on social environment and color polymorphism. Gen Comp Endocrinol 244:77–85
Cantarero A, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Romero-Haro AÁ, Chastel O, Alonso-Alvarez C (2019) Carotenoid-based coloration predicts both longevity and lifetime fecundity in male birds, but testosterone disrupts signal reliability. PLoS One 14:e0221436
Chandolia RK, Weinbauer GF, Behre HM, Nieschlag E (1991) Evaluation of a peripherally selective antiandrogen (Casodex) as a tool for studying the relationship between testosterone and spermatogenesis in the rat. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 38:367–375
Chen F, Langenstroer P, Zhang G, Iwamoto Y, See W (2003) Androgen dependent regulation of bacillus Calmette-Guerin induced interleukin-6 expression in human transitional carcinoma cell lines. J Urol 170:2009–2013
Costantini D, Møller AP (2009) Does immune response cause oxidative stress in birds? A meta-analysis. Comp Biochem Physiol A 153:339–344
Desjardins C, Turek FW (1977) Effects of testosterone on spermatogenesis and luteinizing hormone release in Japanese quail. Gen Comp Endocrinol 33:293–303
Deviche P, Small T, Sharp P, Tsutsui K (2006) Control of luteinizing hormone and testosterone secretion in a flexibly breeding male passerine, the Rufous-winged Sparrow, Aimophila carpalis. Gen Comp Endocrinol 149:226–235
Dho-Moulin M, Morris Fairbrother J (1999) Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Vet Res 30:299–316
Díaz-Sánchez S, Sánchez S, Ewers C, Höfle U (2012) Occurrence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and antimicrobial-resistant E. coli in red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa): sanitary concerns of farming. Avian Pathol 41:337–344
Díaz-Sánchez S, López A, Gamino V, Sánchez S, Ewers C, Höfle U (2013) A colibacillosis outbreak in farmed red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa). Avian Dis 57:143–146
Dufty AM (1989) Testosterone and survival: a cost of aggressiveness? Horm Behav 23:185–193
Escallón C, Becker MH, Walke JB, Jensen RV, Cormier G, Belden LK, Moore IT (2017) Testosterone levels are positively correlated with cloacal bacterial diversity and the relative abundance of Chlamydiae in breeding male rufous-collared sparrows. Funct Ecol 31:192–203
Foerster K, Kempenaers B (2004) Experimentally elevated plasma levels of testosterone do not increase male reproductive success in blue tits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:482–490
Folstad I, Karter AJ (1992) Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat 139:603–622
Fusani L (2008) Endocrinology in field studies: problems and solutions for the experimental design. Gen Comp Endocrinol 157:249–253
Giraudeau M, Duval C, Czirják GÁ, Bretagnolle V, Eraud C, McGraw KJ, Heeb P (2011) Maternal investment of female mallards is influenced by male carotenoid-based coloration. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:781–788
Goymann W, Flores Dávila P (2017) Acute peaks of testosterone suppress paternal care: evidence from individual hormonal reaction norms. Proc R Soc Lond B 284:20170632
Grisham W, Park SH, Hsia JK, Kim C, Leung MC, Kim L, Arnold AP (2007) Effects of long-term flutamide treatment during development in zebra finches. Neurosci Lett 418:92–96
Groothuis TGG, Schwabl H (2008) Hormone-mediated maternal effects in birds: mechanisms matter but what do we know of them? Philos Trans R Soc B 363:1647–1661
Hagen DR, Dziuk PJ (1985) The effect of exogenous testosterone on homospermic and heterospermic fertility in the cock. Biol Reprod 32:1080–1086
Hau M (2007) Regulation of male traits by testosterone: implications for the evolution of vertebrate life histories. BioEssays 29:133–144
Hejmej A, Bilinska B (2018) The effects of flutamide on cell-cell junctions in the testis, epididymis, and prostate. Reprod Toxicol 81:1–16
Kast TL, Ketterson ED, Nolan V (1998) Variation in ejaculate quality in Dark-eyed Juncos according to season, stage of reproduction, and testosterone treatment. Auk 115:684–693
Kessler MJ, Wang Q, Cerroni AM, Grynpas MD, Gonzalez Velez OD, Rawlins RG, Ethun KF, Wimsatt JH, Kensler TB, Pritzker KPH (2016) Long-term effects of castration on the skeleton of male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Am J Primatol 78:152–166
Ketterson ED, Nolan V (1992) Hormones and life histories: an integrative approach. Am Nat 140:S33–S62
Ketterson ED, Nolan V, Cawthorn JM, Parker PG, Ziegenfus C (1996) Phenotypic engineering: using hormones to explore the mechanistic and functional bases of phenotypic variation in nature. Ibis 138:70–86
Kiezun J, Leska A, Kaminska B, Jankowski J, Dusza L (2015) Expression of the androgen receptor in the testes and the concentrations of gonadotropins and sex steroid hormones in male turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) during growth and development. Gen Comp Endocrinol 214:149–156
Kirby JD, Froman DP (2000) Reproduction in male birds. In: Whittow GC (ed) Sturkie’s Avian Physiology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 597–615
Leska A, Kiezun J, Kaminska B, Dusza L (2012) Seasonal changes in the expression of the androgen receptor in the testes of the domestic goose (Anser anser f. domestica). Gen Comp Endocrinol 179:63–70
Liao G, Chen LY, Zhang A, Godavarthy A, Xia F, Ghosh JC, Li H, Chen JD (2003) Regulation of androgen receptor activity by the nuclear receptor corepressor SMRT. J Biol Chem 278:5052–5061
Lofts B, Murton RK (1973) Reproduction in birds. In: Farner DS, King JR (eds) Avian Biology, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 26–29
Lydka M, Kotula-Balak M, Kopera-Sobota I, Tischner M, Bilińska B (2011) Vimentin expression in testes of Arabian stallions. Equine Vet J 43:184–189
Martínez-Padilla J, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Mougeot F, Ludwig SC, Redpath SM (2014a) Experimentally elevated levels of testosterone at independence reduce fitness in a territorial bird. Ecology 95:1033–1044
Martínez-Padilla J, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Mougeot F, Ludwig SC, Redpath SM (2014b) Intra-sexual competition alters the relationship between testosterone and ornament expression in a wild territorial bird. Horm Behav 65:435–444
Maung SL, Follett BK (1978) The endocrine control by luteinizing hormone of testosterone secretion from the testis of the Japanese quail. Gen Comp Endocrinol 36:79–89
McGlothlin JW, Jawor JM, Greives TJ, Casto JM, Phillips JL, Ketterson ED (2008) Hormones and honest signals: males with larger ornaments elevate testosterone more when challenged. J Evol Biol 21:39–48
McGlothlin JW, Whittaker DJ, Schrock SE, Gerlach NM, Jawor JM, Snajdr EA, Ketterson ED (2010) Natural selection on testosterone production in a wild songbird population. Am Nat 175:687–701
Merrill L, Stewart TE, González-Gómez PL, O’Loghlen AL, Wingfield JC, Ellis VA, Rothstein SI (2015) Epaulet size and current condition in red-winged blackbirds: examining a semistatic signal, testosterone, immune function, and parasites. Physiol Biochem Zool 88:11–21
Mills SC, Grapputo A, Jokinen I, Koskela E, Mappes T, Oksanen TA, Poikonen T (2009) Testosterone-mediated effects on fitness-related phenotypic traits and fitness. Am Nat 173:475–487
Min K-J, Lee C-K, Park H-N (2012) The lifespan of Korean eunuchs. Curr Biol 22:R792–R793
Miyamoto H, Yeh S, Lardy H, Messing E, Chang C (1998) Δ5-androstenediol is a natural hormone with androgenic activity in human prostate cancer cells. P Natl Acad Sci USA 95:11083–11088
Møller AP (1991) Sperm competition, sperm depletion, paternal care, and relative testis size in birds. Am Nat 137:882–906
Moore IT, Walker BG, Wingfield JC (2004) The effects of combined aromatase inhibitor and anti-androgen on male territorial aggression in a tropical population of rufous-collared sparrows, Zonotrichia capensis. Gen Comp Endocrinol 135:223–229
Moss R, Parr R, Lambin X (1994) Effects of testosterone on breeding density, breeding success and survival of red grouse. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:175–180
Mougeot F, Piertney SB, Leckie F, Evans S, Moss R, Redpath SM, Hudson PJ (2005a) Experimentally increased aggressiveness reduces population kin structure and subsequent recruitment in red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus. J Anim Ecol 74:488–497
Mougeot F, Redpath SM, Piertney SB, Hudson PJ (2005b) Separating behavioral and physiological mechanisms in testosterone-mediated trade-offs. Am Nat 166:158–168
Nelson RJ (2005) An introduction to behavioral endocrinology, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Nolan V, Ketterson ED, Ziegenfus C, Cullen DP, Chandler CR (1992) Testosterone and avian life histories: effects of experimentally elevated testosterone on prebasic molt and survival in male dark-eyed juncos. Condor 94:364–370
Orton F, Säfholm M, Jansson E, Carlsson Y, Eriksson A, Fick J, Uren Webster T, McMillan T, Leishman M, Verbruggen B, Economou T, Tyler CR, Berg C (2018) Exposure to an anti-androgenic herbicide negatively impacts reproductive physiology and fertility in Xenopus tropicalis. Sci Rep 8:9124
Raouf SA, Parker PG, Ketterson ED, Nolan V, Ziegenfus C (1997) Testosterone affects reproductive success by influencing extra–pair fertilizations in male dark–eyed juncos (Aves: Junco hyemalis). Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1599–1603
Reed WL, Clark ME, Parker PG, Raouf SA, Arguedas N, Monk DS, Snajdr E, Nolan V Jr, Ketterson ED (2006) Physiological effects on demography: a long-term experimental study of testosterone’s effects on fitness. Am Nat 167:667–683
Ricklefs RE, Cadena CD (2007) Lifespan is unrelated to investment in reproduction in populations of mammals and birds in captivity. Ecol Lett 10:867–872
Saino N, Møller AP, Bolzerna AM (1995) Testosterone effects on the immune system and parasite infestations in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica): an experimental test of the immunocompetence hypothesis. Behav Ecol 6:397–404
Schoech SJ, Ketterson ED, Nolan V, Sharp PJ, Buntin JD (1998) The effect of exogenous testosterone on parental behavior, plasma prolactin, and prolactin binding sites in dark-eyed juncos. Horm Behav 34:1–10
Schwagmeyer PL, Parker PG, Mock DW, Schwabl H (2012) Alternative matings and the opportunity costs of paternal care in house sparrows. Behav Ecol 23:1108–1114
Soma KK, Sullivan K, Wingfield J (1999) Combined aromatase inhibitor and antiandrogen treatment decreases territorial aggression in a wild songbird during the nonbreeding season. Gen Comp Endocrinol 115:442–453
Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Thear K (1987) Incubation: a guide to hatching and rearing. Broad Leys Publishing, Essex
Turek F, Desjardins C, Menaker M (1976) Antigonadal and progonadal effects of testosterone in male House Sparrows. Gen Comp Endocrinol 28:395–402
Turek F, Wolfson A, Desjardins C (1980) Testosterone treatment blocks the termination of the gonadal photorefractory condition in white-throated sparrows maintained on short days. Gen Comp Endocrinol 41:365–371
Vizcarra J, Alan R, Kirby J (2015) Reproduction in male birds. In: Scanes CG (ed) Sturkie’s Avian Physiology, 6th edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 667–693
Wingfield JC (1984) Environmental and endocrine control of reproduction in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia. II. Agonistic interactions as environmental information stimulating secretion of testosterone. Gen Comp Endocrinol 56:417–424
Wingfield JC, Hegner RE, Dufty AM, Ball GF (1990) The “challenge hypothesis”: theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. Am Nat 136:829–846
Yeap BB, Alfonso H, Chubb SAP, Handelsman DJ, Hankey GJ, Almeida OP, Golledge J, Norman PE, Flicker L (2014) In older men, an optimal plasma testosterone is associated with reduced all-cause mortality and higher dihydrotestosterone with reduced ischemic heart disease mortality, while estradiol levels do not predict mortality. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:E9–E18
Zera AJ, Harshman LG (2001) The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 32:95–126
Zhang A, Zhao JC, Kim J, Fong K-W, Yang YA, Chakravarti D, Mo Y-Y, Yu J (2015) LncRNA HOTAIR enhances the androgen-receptor-mediated transcriptional program and drives castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cell Rep 13:209–221
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Carlos Cano and Francisco Perez from Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM), Spain, for kindly supplying partridges for the study. Thanks to Emiliano Sobrino Fernando Dueñas and Luis Montó for bird maintenance, and Amalia Molinero, Ester Ferrero, Laura Ramírez, and Clara Rico for technical support at the sampling work. At the CEBC, we thank C. Trouvé and C. Parenteau for their assistance on the hormone assays. We acknowledge Sandra Díaz-Sánchez and Ursula Höfle for veterinary support, including parasitological and bacteriological analyses and advice on E. coli epidemiology. We acknowledge two anonymous referees for their contribution to improving an early version of the text.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Turku (UTU) including Turku University Central Hospital. Financial support was obtained from the projects PII1I09-0271-5037, PII1C09-0128-4724, SBPLY/17/180501/000468 from the JCCM (co-financed with European Regional Development Fund-ERDF), CGL2009-10883-C02-02 from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICIN, Spain), CGL2015-69338-C2-2-P from Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (MINECO), and PID2019-109303GB-I00 from MICIN. AC and LP-R were supported by a “Juan de la Cierva-formación” postdoctoral grant (MINECO, FJCI-2015-23536) and a SECTI postdoctoral contract from the University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), respectively. AC is currently supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from Fundación Ramón Areces. AAR-H is funded by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant (agreement 842085).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This investigation was approved by the institutional animal welfare committee (University of Castilla-La Mancha’s Committee on Ethics and Animal Experimentation) in accordance with pertinent Spanish (RD1201/2005) and European Union (86/609/CEE and 2010/63/EU) legislation under Protocol number 1011.01. The implanting procedure was performed under veterinary supervision. We used a planned humane endpoint where any bird would be immediately euthanized by cervical dislocation when it rapidly lost more than 20% of body mass.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 72 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Alonso-Alvarez, C., Cantarero, A., Romero-Haro, A.Á. et al. Life-long testosterone and antiandrogen treatments affect the survival and reproduction of captive male red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74, 98 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02878-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02878-1