Abstract
Group-living animals need to coordinate their activity in order to maintain gregariousness. Although individuals have their own nutritional, social, and reproductive needs, they have to reach consensus to decide where and when to travel. Collective movements are the outcome of one individual’s departure, who is then followed by other group members. We investigated departure initiation in a group of bonobos at Wamba, DR Congo, to determine the distribution of leadership among group members. If three or more bonobos started moving more than 30 m, we assigned the individual who moved first as the one who initiated the movement. Two hundred and fifty-four departures were observed. First, we examined whether the frequency of initiation differed according to the following attributes of individuals: sex, age, stage in sexual swelling cycle, dominance, and affiliative relationship. We also examined whether one or more individual(s) initiate departure more or less frequently than expected by chance. A significant interaction between sex and age was found, indicating that the effect of age was greater among females than among males. Individuals who were more central to the grooming network initiated departures more frequently. The three oldest females initiated more often than expected. Old females may be followed because of coalitionary supports they often give to younger females, and of their greater knowledge about ranging area. Leadership in bonobos was not equally shared among group members, and old females were “key individuals” who helped to maintain cohesiveness in their fission-fusion society.
Significance statement
When group-living animals travel from one location to another, they must coordinate when and where to travel; otherwise, they might spread apart. Bonobos are one of our closest living relatives and have a fission-fusion social system. We investigated the initiation of group departure in wild bonobos to determine the distribution of leadership among group members. We found that the frequency of initiation was associated with the individual’s age, affiliative relationships, and male dominance rank. The three oldest females initiated departures more frequently than expected, suggesting that these individuals were habitual initiators and took an important role to preserve cohesiveness. We discuss how this “old female leadership” may emerge in a male-philopatric society.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Aggregating with conspecifics provides advantages, such as reducing predation risk, opportunities for social learning, and collectively protecting valuable resources (Fashing 2001; Childress and Lung 2003; Aplin et al. 2015). However, individuals need to synchronize their activities and maintain cohesiveness in order to benefit from these advantages, which may come at a cost to the nutritional, social, and reproductive needs of the individual (King and Sueur 2011; Sueur et al. 2013b). In particular, when the group travels from one location to another, its members must coordinate when and where to travel; otherwise, they might fission (King and Sueur 2011). Some individuals might have to shorten their resting time when the group starts to travel, while others might have to wait until the group finishes feeding before they can depart. According to the costs and benefits of association, animals form various types of aggregations from cohesive groups, in which stable members always move together, to fission-fusion societies, in which either stable or flexible individuals aggregate when the benefits of aggregation exceed its costs (Aureli et al. 2008).
The process of decision-making during collective movement has gained much attention over the past several decades, being described in various animal species including insects, fish, birds, and mammals (Conradt and Roper 2005; Petit and Bon 2010). When individuals form a large group, such as a flock of birds or a school of fish, each individual follows a set of simple rules to synchronize the movement and maintain cohesiveness, for example, adjusting direction and speed to that of neighboring individuals (self-organizing system: Couzin and Krause 2003; Sumpter 2006). On the other hand, in species that form a stable and cohesive social group, wherein group members are able to communicate before or during travel, one or several individual(s) may lead the groups’ movement while others follow; this is the concept of “leadership” (King 2010).
When all group members initiate departure or equally share the role of walking in the leading position, the leadership style is called “equally shared consensus” (Pyritz et al. 2011). In Tonkean macaques (Macaca tonkeana), all individuals, including immature ones, initiate departure at the same frequency (Sueur and Petit 2008; Bourjade and Sueur 2010). At the other extreme is the “unshared consensus” (Pyritz et al. 2011), when one individual always leads the group’s movement. For example, in the mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei), the dominant silverback initiates all group movements (Schaller 1963; Watts 2000). The “partially shared consensus” style (Pyritz et al. 2011) is intermediate to the two extremes and is most commonly observed among mammals (Smith et al. 2015). In this style, leadership is distributed among group members, but unequally. Individuals with particular attributes are more often observed to initiate group departures or walk in the front position while traveling (King 2010; Smith et al. 2015).
In some species, females lead group movements more frequently than do males. Such “female leadership” is commonly explained by the females’ relatively high motivation to find food at the next destination, since they typically require more energy than males for reproduction (e.g., Boinski 1991; Erhart and Overdorff 1999; Fischhoff et al. 2007; Barelli et al. 2008). Moreover, in the plains zebra (Equus quagga), pregnant or lactating females are more likely than others to travel in front of the group, possibly because these females have markedly high nutritional needs (Fischhoff et al. 2007; also see Furrer et al. 2012), although some studies failed to detect similar results (Stueckle and Zinner 2008; Barelli et al. 2008; Belle et al. 2013). In addition, females displaying sexual signals attract males (Nunn 1999), who may then follow them. Female sexual attractiveness may influence collective group movement and partly explain female leadership.
Experience is also an important factor (King et al. 2009). In an experimental study using homing pigeons (Columba livia domestica), individuals who had more experience flying the route led the flock more frequently than did less experienced individuals (Flack et al. 2012; but see also Flack et al. 2013). Also, McComb et al. (2011) found that groups of African elephants (Loxodonta africana) that were led by older matriarchs were able to make better decisions when faced with dangerous situations. Older individuals might have more knowledge of their range and be better equipped to lead group members to better feeding or safer resting places (McComb et al. 2001, 2011; Brent et al. 2015).
Social relationships within the group, both agonistic and affiliative, affect the distribution of leadership (King et al. 2009). In species with a steep dominance hierarchy and intolerant social relationships, higher-ranking individuals often lead group movements (e.g., Squires and Daws 1975; Peterson et al. 2002; Sueur and Petit 2008; King et al. 2009; Bonnani et al. 2010; Flack et al. 2013). On the other hand, leadership is more likely to be distributed equally in species with a weakly linear or non-linear dominance hierarchy and tolerant social relationships (Squires and Daws 1975; Sueur and Petit 2008; Fernández et al. 2013). In species that engage in affiliative interactions, such as grooming and greeting other group members, individuals with strong social affiliations tend to be followed more often (King et al. 2008, 2009; Sueur et al. 2013a). For example, in Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana), individuals with higher eigenvector centrality in the proximity network, and those who spent more time grooming, successfully initiated departures more frequently than did asocial individuals (Wang et al. 2016).
In species characterized by fission-fusion grouping, leadership by a specific individual(s) is perhaps unlikely because the membership of subgroups varies from time to time (Fischhoff et al. 2007). Nonetheless, recent empirical studies revealed that consistent leadership can also be exhibited by certain individuals living in fission-fusion societies (Lewis et al. 2011; Smith et al. 2015). This might be because associating with these individuals benefits followers, and such benefits surpass the cost of association. Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) encountered abundant food resources more frequently when they were led by habitual leaders than when they were led by other individuals (Lewis et al. 2013). Similarly, subordinate spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) follow the movement of dominant females, expecting long-term benefits in the form of increased social and feeding tolerance gained from frequent association with dominants (Smith et al. 2008, 2015). However, information on leadership patterns in fission-fusion societies is still scarce.
Bonobos (Pan paniscus) are, evolutionarily, one of our closest living relatives, and live in male-philopatric, multi-male/multi-female social groups of stable membership (Kano 1982; Eriksson et al. 2006; Sakamaki et al. 2015). They mainly feed on ripe fruit (Kano and Mulavwa 1984; White 1998) and have a fission-fusion association pattern in which a group splits into temporary subgroups (“parties”; Kano 1982). Although bonobos were reputed to be egalitarian (de Waal 1997), some studies have shown that male bonobos have a linear, steep dominance relationship (Stevens et al. 2007; Surbeck et al. 2011). However, researchers agree that bonobos are highly tolerant, as dominants and subordinates engage in close relationships, with low levels of violence and high levels of tolerance around contested resources, especially among females (Kano 1992; Parish 1994; Furuichi 1997; Vervaecke et al. 2000; Hare et al. 2007).
Bonobo society is unique among male-philopatric societies, in that female-female pairs associate as frequently as, if not more than, male-male or (non-related) male-female pairs (Kuroda 1979; White 1988, 1998; Kano 1992; Furuichi 2009, 2011; Hohmann and Fruth 2002). Females frequently form coalitions, which might be important for preventing male harassment (Kano 1992; Parish 1996; White and Wood 2007; Furuichi 2011; Tokuyama and Furuichi 2016). Such coalitions have a unidirectional relationship, in which older females support younger ones, making associations with older females potentially very beneficial for younger ones (Tokuyama and Furuichi 2016). Possibly because of this benefit, young female bonobos actively keep close association and interact with older females (Furuichi 1989; Idani 1991). This leads to the prediction that cohesiveness of female bonobos in their fission-fusion society may be maintained by the motivation of younger females to follow older ones. Anecdotal observations also suggest that old females play an important role in bonobos’ party movement. Before traveling, bonobos typically descend from tall fruiting trees and take a short break (Furuichi 2011). During this time, some of the males climb down and perform branch-dragging behavior, but the entire party does not move until the old females climb down and initiate movement in a direction of their own choice (Furuichi 2011). However, this observation has yet to be tested in a systematic study.
The goal of this study was to examine the distribution of leadership during group travel in wild bonobos. Here, we focused on determining which factors affect the direction and timing of departure (i.e., initiation; Pryitz 2011) during group movement, recognizing that individuals who initiate departure do not necessarily continue to walk in the leading position (Pryitz 2011; Belle et al. 2013). Drawing on past studies, we propose the following predictions, which are not mutually exclusive:
-
Because animals with high nutritional needs may determine the timing of departure, females will initiate departures more frequently than males.
-
Because maximally tumescent females may attract sexually mature males and provoke collective departures, females initiate departure more frequently when they are with maximal swelling, compared to when they are with non-maximal swelling.
-
Because of the benefits of following a knowledgeable, experienced individual, older individuals will initiate departures more frequently than younger ones. In addition, because younger females may benefit from agonistic support by older females against male harassment, the age effect will be larger among females than among males.
-
Because of the tolerant social relationships in bonobos, dominance does not affect the frequency of initiation, and none of the group members will initiate departures more or less frequently than expected.
-
Because of the affiliative relationships in the group, individuals with a higher value of eigenvector centrality in grooming networks will initiate departures more often than individuals with smaller values.
Methods
Study site and subjects
Observations were conducted on the “PE group” of wild bonobos in the Wamba, Luo Scientific Reserve, Democratic Republic of the Congo, where long-term research has been conducted since 1973 (Kano 1992; Tokuyama and Furuichi 2016).
At the time of this study, PE group consisted of 26–27 individuals. All individuals were already identified and habituated before the beginning of the study period. Our study subjects were individuals older than 8 years, excluding one female who emigrated during the study period (15 individuals: nine females and six males; Table 1). Data from females who temporarily visited this group were not analyzed. We estimated each subject’s age based on physical features. The kin relationships among study subjects were unknown, except for Ic, the known mother of IR.
Behavioral observation
NT observed bonobos for 1698 h, with the help of two local assistants, from August to November 2012, August 2013 to January 2014, July to September 2014, and January to June 2015. We recorded 1-h party size, i.e., all individuals seen within 1 h (1-h party method: Hashimoto et al. 2001; Mulavwa et al. 2008). We continuously recorded “general activity”—the activity in which the majority of the party members were engaging (i.e., resting, feeding, and traveling).
We also recorded grooming interactions by instantaneous scan sampling (Altmann 1974); at 5-min intervals and for all visible individuals, we recorded whether they were grooming with any other individuals. 5403 ± 1491 scan samples per subject individual (average ± SD) were collected. The grooming index was calculated as follows: number of scans a pair was seen to be grooming, divided by the number of scans the pair was found in the same scan. The eigenvector centrality coefficient for each individual was calculated from the grooming index, using UCINET software (Table 1). To assess the dominance relationships, we recorded all observed dyadic aggressive interactions. The firmness of each female’s sexual swelling was scored daily (see Ryu et al. 2015 for details). It was not possible to record data blind because our study involved wild animals in the field.
For each departure, the individual who started to move first was defined as the initiator. We recorded the identity of the initiator and other subjects who followed them. Each follower had to join the departure <1 min after the previous follower moved. Collective departures were defined as occurring when at least three individuals moved in the same direction for more than 30 m horizontally, without stopping, and after engaging in an activity (other than traveling) for at least 5 min. These parameters were defined during a pilot study conducted 2 months prior to this study period (Pyritz et al. 2010). For this study, we used the departures in which the initiator-follower relationship was clear. For example, when two animals started moving simultaneously and other individuals joined the movement, we discarded the data because we could not determine who the initiator was. We also excluded cases where the initiator did not move with followers for more than 30 m, i.e., when other individuals continued traveling even though the initiator stopped before having traveled 30 m.
For each individual, we calculated the frequency of being an initiator through an “Initiation Index.” The Initiation Index of an individual (A) was calculated as follows:
In this study, we refrained from recording cases in which one or two individuals left the party, because such individuals often leave the party quietly and it is difficult to observe them in dense vegetation. Branch-dragging, considered to be a pre-departure behavior in bonobos (Ingmanson 1996), was not analyzed in this study because branch-dragging was suggested not to be associated with the timing and direction of departures (Furuichi 2011). Also, branch-dragging is used as a displaying behavior by males (Kano 1992), and it is difficult to distinguish between these two forms of the behavior.
Data analysis
We used two approaches: attribute-based analysis and individual-based analysis. All statistical analyses were conducted using R version 3.2.3 (R development Core team 2008), with a 95% confidence level. Probabilities between 5 and 10% are reported as trends.
The attribute-based analysis
We examined whether the frequency of initiation differed according to the attributes of individuals: sex, age, stage of sexual swelling, dominance, and affiliative relationships. We did not assess the reproductive status of females, because their sexual swellings also come into maximal tumescence during pregnancy and lactation (Furuichi 1987; Douglas et al. 2016), which makes the status (pregnant, lactating, or cycling) of each female difficult to determine. We ran a generalized linear model (GLM) to examine the effect of age, sex, and sociality on the Initiation Index. Initiation Index for each individual was used as a predictor using the “c-bind” function and binomial error distribution. We used estimated age (in 2012), sex, value of eigenvector centrality in the grooming network, and interaction of age and sex as fixed factors.
The effect of dominance status on the Initiation Index was examined only in males because the dominance hierarchy among females was not significantly linear (calculated by ADAGIO, Douglas et al. 2017; h’ = 0.39, ns), probably because of the small number of dyadic agonistic interactions (see Supplemental Table 1). The male dominance hierarchy was determined using the outcome of dyadic male-male aggression. From August 2012 to March 2015, the dominance hierarchy among males was stable and the alpha-male was SN. However, after multiple individuals severely attacked SN on March 5, 2015, his dominance status dropped to the rank of third or fourth (NT and T. Sakamaki, personal observation). Because of this drastic change in dominance hierarchy, we only used data for initiation of departures and agonistic interactions observed before March 4, 2015, to examine whether dominance status affected the male Initiation Index. Data obtained after March 4, 2015, were not used for this analysis. The dominance hierarchy between August 2012 and March 4, 2015, was significantly linear (ADAGIO, h’ = 1.0, p < 0.01) and was not significantly correlated with age (Pearson’s product-moment correlation test, r = −0.32, df = 4, p = 0.53). We tested the effect of dominance rank on the Initiation Index using Pearson’s product-moment correlation test.
We calculated two Initiation Index values for each female—with and without maximal sexual swelling—and compared these by paired t test to examine whether the stage of a female’s sexual swelling affected their Initiation Index.
Individual-based analysis
To determine whether specific individual(s) initiated departures more or less often than expected, we compared the number of times each individual initiated a departure with the expected number, based on 1000 randomized iterations for each individual (randomization protocol: Manly 2006; see also Lewis et al. 2011). For all departures in which an individual participated, we randomized the order of individuals and counted the number of departures in which the individual was in the first position, repeating this procedure 1000 times for each individual. Then, we compared the observed number to the distribution of the expected number of departures for which the individual was the initiator. We considered that an individual initiated departures more often than expected if the observed number was greater than 97.5% of the randomization distribution, and less than expected if the observed number was less than 2.5% (p < 0.05 for a two-tailed test).
Results
Parties were composed of 9.8 ± 3.2 individuals (mean ± SD, 6.0 females and 3.8 males) during the observation period. We observed 254 successful departures. Departures contained 6.1 ± 0.2 individuals (mean ± SE, 4.1 females and 2.0 males). Of the 255 successful departures, 208 (82.0%) were initiated by females and 46 (18.0%) by males. All individuals were observed to initiate departures at least once (Table 1).
Sex, age, and sociality of the individual
Interaction between age and sex showed a significant effect on the Initiation Index (GLM, Table 2). This was due to the fact that older females were more likely to initiate movement than younger females, while initiation of movement by males was little influenced by age (Fig. 1). Eigenvector centrality coefficients in the grooming network were positively correlated with the Initiation Index (GLM, Table 2).
Social rank among males
Among males, dominant individuals tended to have a higher Initiation Index than subordinates (Pearson’s product-moment correlation test, r = −0.76, df = 4, p = 0.08).
Stages of sexual swelling among females
Departure initiation frequency for females did not vary according to the firmness of sexual swellings (paired t test, t = 1.82, df = 8, p = 0.11). Nor did the number of male or female followers significantly increase when the initiator was maximally swollen (female initiator with maximal swelling (n = 115) vs. female initiator with non-maximal swelling (n = 93): 1.88 male followers vs. 1.93 male followers; Wilcoxon rank sum test, W = 5783, p = 0.31; 4.16 female followers vs. 4.23 female followers, Wilcoxon rank sum test, W = 5699, p = 0.49).
Individual-based differences in initiation
Three females (Bk, Kb, and Hd) initiated departures more frequently, and three males (ML, GI, and IR) and four females (Mt, Sk, Mr. and Nr) did so less frequently than expected by chance (Fig. 2). The three who initiated departures more frequently than expected were the oldest individuals among females in this study group.
Discussion
We examined the initiation of departures in wild bonobos, who have a fission-fusion grouping pattern and are considered to be one of the most tolerant primate species. Species with high levels of social tolerance tend to have equally shared consensus leadership (Sueur and Petit 2008; Petit and Bon 2010; Fernández et al. 2013). We found that all individuals initiated departures at least once. However, both our attribute-based and individual-based analyses showed that the frequency of initiation was greatly skewed, suggesting that wild bonobos in this study exhibited a rather strong “partially shared consensus” leadership (Pyritz et al. 2011).
We found that age had a greater effect among females than among males. In previous studies, the tendency for older individuals to lead group movements more often than younger individuals was detected mostly among females. For example, such tendency was observed in African elephants (Loxodonta africana; McComb et al. 2001) and in giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis; Berry and Bercovitch 2015), both of which have grouping patterns in which females aggregate while males do not often associate with other individuals. Killer whale females live more than 30 years after menopause (ca. 35 years old), whereas most males die before reaching 35 years, and these post-menopausal females tend to be in the lead position during group movement (Brent et al. 2015). Post-menopausal females are observed in the lead position more frequently in times of food scarcity, suggesting that younger killer whales may rely on the greater knowledge of post-menopausal females to find prey (Brent et al. 2015). In our study, the effect of age on Initiation Index was also greater among females than among males. This tendency might reflect differences in reproductive strategies between the sexes; the reproductive success of females depends on feeding efficiency, while that of males depends on mating opportunities (Trivers 1972).
The other possible explanation as to why the effect of age was stronger among females might be that younger females follow older ones because of the benefits they get from coalitions (Tokuyama and Furuichi 2016). Despite living in a male-philopatric society, female bonobos are more cohesive and centralized in the party than males (White 1988, 1998; Kano 1992; Parish and de Waal 2000; Hohmann and Fruth 2002; Furuichi 2009, 2011). They form coalitions more frequently than do males (Stevens et al. 2006; Surbeck and Hohmann 2013; Tokuyama and Furuichi 2016). Furthermore, older females actively give agonistic support to younger females when the latter are harassed by males (Tokuyama and Furuichi 2016). The benefit of coalitionary support might contribute to the greater effect of age on the Initiation Index among females compared to males.
Among males, dominant ones tended to have higher initiation indices, although this was not found to be statistically significant. In all captive and wild bonobo groups, some females clearly possess higher social ranks than males (Furuichi 1997, 2011; Vervaecke et al. 2000; Surbeck and Hohmann 2013). We could not determine a linear dominance hierarchy containing both males and females in this study, because the number and combinations of dyadic inter-sex aggression were too few. However, the three oldest females, who initiated departures more frequently than expected, won 84% of inter-sex dyadic agonistic interactions during the study period (Tokuyama and Furuichi 2016), suggesting that these females were apparently dominant over the males in the study group. This dominance structure might have contributed to the distribution of the initiation of departures in this group of bonobos.
Prolonged maximal sexual swelling periods are a conspicuous aspect in bonobos (Furuichi 1987; Kano 1992). Although female chimpanzees exhibit maximal sexual swelling only when they are fertile, female bonobos do so and copulate even during non-ovulatory periods (Furuichi 1987; Reichert et al. 2002; Douglas et al. 2016). Although we predicted that the movements of females with maximal swelling may attract males and provoke collective departures, females with maximal swelling did not initiate departures more frequently compared to those without maximal swelling. Also, the number of male and female followers did not significantly increase when the initiator was a female with maximal swelling. Further studies that include hormonal analyses are needed to investigate whether females initiate departures more frequently when they are in the peri-ovulatory period than when they are not. Such studies may help understand whether male bonobos are able to discriminate when females are ovulating in their prolonged maximal swelling period.
Eigenvector centrality coefficient in grooming networks was positively correlated with the Initiation Index. Social grooming is an important social tool in non-human primates for constructing and maintaining social bonds. Higher centrality in grooming networks suggests that the individual is more strongly connected with other group members. Departures by such individuals might elicit a reaction from followers more efficiently than departures by individuals with fewer connections (King et al. 2008; Sueur et al. 2013a; Wang et al. 2016). However, it is worth noting that the oldest female, Bk, who had the highest Initiation Index in the group, also had the lowest eigenvector centrality coefficient value in the grooming network.
Three females initiated departures more frequently than expected in the individual-based analysis. Although leadership by a restricted set of individuals is considered less likely in a fission-fusion society (Fischhoff et al. 2007), recent studies, including this one, are revealing that the relationship of habitual leaders and followers does emerge in fission-fusion societies. About 20% of individuals consistently acted as leaders of group movements in bottlenose dolphins, another dynamic fission-fusion grouping species (Lewis et al. 2011, 2013). The spotted hyena also exhibits a flexible fission-fusion society, and individuals usually follow the movement of the most dominant female in the subgroup (Smith et al. 2015). Individuals may be motivated to associate with a specific individual(s), for example, to benefit from experienced individuals (this study; Lewis et al. 2013), to engage in tolerant relationships by frequent associations (Smith et al. 2015), or to obtain coalitionary support (this study; Tokuyama and Furuichi 2016).
Although equally shared consensus leadership has the lowest consensus cost to group members (Conradt and Roper 2003, 2007), it seems the distribution of individuals in leadership roles is skewed in all group-living great apes. Although there is no systematic study, it has been reported that mountain gorillas have personal leadership, wherein the dominant silverback leads group movements (Schaller 1963; Watts 2000), and also that dominant male chimpanzees coordinate group movements (Boesch and Boesch-Achermann 2000). In bonobos, we found that the leadership of group departures was partially shared and that old females most frequently dictated the timing of departures.
Human societies exhibit skewed leadership when groups engage in consensus on decision-making. Great variations exist in the strength and type of leadership, from despotic to democratic and female-led to male-led (Vugt 2006). Great apes are known to exhibit rather diverse and flexible social patterns within species. Feeding habits and social organization vary among subspecies of gorillas (Yamagiwa et al. 2003). Food availability, patterns of fission-fusion dynamics, strength of social bonding, and dominance steepness are different between groups of chimpanzees and bonobos (Boesch et al. 2002; Lehmann and Boesch 2008; Kaburu and Newton-fisher 2015). A comparison of the leadership distribution among (sub-) species, and even among groups of great apes with different social patterns, might give us important insights into the emergence and evolution of various types of leadership roles in humans.
References
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267
Aplin LM, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J, Cockburn A, Thornton A, Sheldon BC (2015) Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds. Nature 518:538–541
Aureli F, Schaffner CM, Boesch C, Bearder SK, Call J, Chapman CA, Connor R, Fiore AD, Dunbar RIM, Henzi SP, Holekamp K, Korstjens AH, Layton R, Lee P, Lehmann J, Manson JH, Ramos-Fernandez G, Strier KB, van Schaik CP (2008) Fission-fusion dynamics: new research frameworks. Curr Anthropol 49:627–654
Barelli C, Boesch C, Heistermann M, Reichard UH (2008) Female white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) lead group movements and have priority of access to food resources. Behaviour 145:965–981
Belle SV, Estrada A, Garber PA (2013) Collective group movement and leadership in wild black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:31–41
Berry PSM, Bercovitch FB (2015) Leadership of herd progressions in the Thornicroft’s giraffe of Zambia. Afr J Ecol 53:175–182
Boesch C, Boesch-Achermann H (2000) The chimpanzees of the Taï forest: behavioural ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant LF (2002) Behavioral diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, New York
Boinski S (1991) The coordination of spatial position: a field study of the vocal behaviour of adult female squirrel monkeys. Anim Behav 41:89–102
Bonnani R, Cafazzo S, Valsecchi P, Natoli E (2010) Effect of affiliative and agonistic relationships on leadership behaviour in free-ranging dogs. Anim Behav 79:981–991
Bourjade M, Sueur C (2010) Shared or unshared consensus for collective movement? Towards methodological concerns. Behav Process 84:648–652
Brent LJN, Franks DW, Foster EA, Balcomb KC, Cant MA, Croft DP (2015) Ecological knowledge, leadership, and the evolution of menopause in killer whales. Curr Biol 25:746–750
Childress MJ, Lung MA (2003) Predation risk, gender and the group size effect: does elk vigilance depend upon the behaviour of conspecifics? Anim Behav 66:389–398
Conradt L, Roper TJ (2003) Group decision-making in animals. Nature 421:155–158
Conradt L, Roper TJ (2005) Consensus decision making in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 20:449–456
Conradt L, Roper TJ (2007) Democracy in animals: the evolution of shared group decisions. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:2317–2326
Couzin I, Krause J (2003) Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. Adv Stud Behav 32:1–75
de Waal FBM (1997) Bonobo, the forgotten ape. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles
Douglas PH, Hohmann G, Murtagh R, Thiessen-Bock R, Deschner T (2016) Mixed messages: wild female bonobos show high variability in the timing of ovulation in relation to sexual swelling patterns. BMC Evol Biol 16:140
Douglas PH, Ngonga Ngomo AC, Hohmann G (2017) A novel approach for dominance assessment in gregarious species: ADAGIO. Anim Behav 123:21–32
Erhart EM, Overdorff DJ (1999) Female coordination of group travel in wild Propithecus and Eulemur. Int J Primatol 20:927–940
Eriksson J, Heike S, Dieter L, Kayser M, Erler A, Hashimoto C, Hohmann G, Boesch C, Vigilant L (2006) Y-chromosome analysis confirms highly sex-biased dispersal and suggests a low male effective population size in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Mol Ecol 15:939–949
Fashing PJ (2001) Male and female strategies during intergroup encounters in guerezas (Colobus guereza): evidence for resource defense mediated through males and a comparison with other primates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:219–230
Fernández VA, Kowalewski M, Zunino GE (2013) Who is coordinating collective movements in black and gold howler monkeys? Primates 54:191–199
Fischhoff IR, Sundaresan SR, Cordingley J, Larkin HM, Sellier MJ, Rubenstein DI (2007) Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii. Anim Behav 73:825–831
Flack A, Pettit B, Freeman R, Guilford T, Biro D (2012) What are leaders made of? The role of individual experience in determining leader–follower relations in homing pigeons. Anim Behav 83:703–709
Flack A, Ákos Z, Nagy M, Vicsek T, Biro D (2013) Robustness of flight leadership relations in pigeons. Anim Behav 86:723–732
Furrer RD, Kunc HP, Manser MB (2012) Variable initiators of group departure in a cooperative breeder: the influence of sex, age, state and foraging success. Anim Behav 84:205–212
Furuichi T (1987) Sexual swelling, receptivity and grouping of wild pygmy chimpanzee females at Wamba, Zaire. Primates 28:309–318
Furuichi T (1989) Social interactions and the life history of female Pan paniscus in Wamba, Zaire. Int J Primatol 10:173–197
Furuichi T (1997) Agonistic interactions and Matrifocal dominance rank of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba. Int J Primatol 18:855–875
Furuichi T (2009) Factors underlying party size differences between chimpanzees and bonobos: a review and hypotheses for future study. Primates 50:197–209
Furuichi T (2011) Female contributions to the peaceful nature of bonobo society. Evol Anthropol 20:131–142
Hare B, Melis AP, Woods V, Hastings S, Wrangham R (2007) Tolerance allows bonobos to outperform chimpanzees on a cooperative task. Curr Biol 17:619–623
Hashimoto C, Furuichi T, Tashiro Y (2001) What factors affect the size of chimpanzee parties in the Kalinzu Forest, Uganda? Examination of fruit abundance and number of estrous females. Int J Primatol 22:947–959
Hohmann G, Fruth B (2002) Dynamics in social organization in bonobos (Pan paniscus). In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant LF (eds) Behavioral diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 138–155
Idani G (1991) Social relationships between immigrant and resident bonobo (Pan paniscus) females at Wamba. Folia Primatol 51:83–95
Ingmanson EJ (1996) Tool-using behavior in wild Pan paniscus: social and ecological considerations. In: Russon AE, Kim AB, Sue TP (eds) Reaching into thought: the minds of the great apes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 190–210
Kaburu SSK, Newton-Fisher NE (2015) Egalitarian despots: hierarchy steepness, reciprocity and the grooming-trade model in wild chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 99:61–71
Kano T (1982) The social group of pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) of Wamba. Primates 23:171–188
Kano T (1992) The last ape: pygmy chimpanzee behavior and ecology. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Kano T, Mulavwa M (1984) Feeding ecology of the pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) of Wamba. In: Susman RL (ed) The pygmy chimpanzee. Springer, New York, pp 233–274
King AJ (2010) Follow me! I’m a leader if you do; I’m a failed initiator if you don’t? Behav Process 84:671–674
King AJ, Sueur C (2011) Where next? Group coordination and collective decision making by primates. Int J Primatol 6:1245–1267
King AJ, Douglas CMS, Huchard E, Isaac NJB, Cowlishaw G (2008) Dominance and affiliation mediate despotism in a social primate. Curr Biol 18:1833–1838
King AJ, Johnson DDP, van Vugt M (2009) The origins and evolution of leadership. Curr Biol 19:911–916
Kuroda S (1979) Grouping of the pygmy chimpanzees. Primates 20:161–183
Lehmann J, Boesch C (2008) Sexual differences in chimpanzee sociality. Int J Primatol 29:65–81
Lewis JS, Wartzok D, Heithaus MR (2011) Highly dynamic fission–fusion species can exhibit leadership when traveling. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1061–1069
Lewis JS, Wartzok D, Heithaus MR (2013) Individuals as information sources: could followers benefit from leaders’ knowledge? Behaviour 150:635–657
Manly BFJ (2006) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
McComb K, Moss C, Durant SM, Baker L, Sayialel S (2001) Matriarchs as repositories of social knowledge in African elephants. Science 292:491–494
McComb K, Shannon G, Durant SM, Sayialel K, Slotow R, Poole J, Moss C (2011) Leadership in elephants: the adaptive value of age. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:3270–3276
Mulavwa M, Furuichi T, Yangozene K, Yamba-Yamba M, Motema-Salo B, Idani G, Ihobe H, Hashimoto C, Tahiro Y, Mwanza N (2008) Seasonal changes in fruit production and party size of bonobos at Wamba. In: Furuichi T, Thompson J (eds) The bonobos: behavior, ecology, and conservation. Springer, New York, pp 121–134
Nunn CL (1999) The evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates and the graded-signal hypothesis. Anim Behav 58:229–246
Parish AR (1994) Sex and food control in the ‘uncommon chimpanzee’: how bonobo females overcome a phylogenetic legacy of male dominance. Ethol Sociobiol 15:157–179
Parish AR (1996) Female relationships in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Hum Nature-Int Bios 7:61–96
Parish AR, de Waal FBM (2000) The other ‘closest living relative’: how bonobos (Pan paniscus) challenge traditional assumptions about females, dominance, intra- and intersexual interactions, and hominid evolution. Ann N Y Acad Sci 907:97–113
Peterson RO, Jacobs AK, Drummer TD, Mech LD, Smith DW (2002) Leadership behavior in relation to dominance and reproductive status in gray wolves, Canis lupus. Can J Zool 80:1405–1412
Petit O, Bon R (2010) Decision-making processes: the case of collective movements. Behav Process 84:635–647
Pyritz L, Fichtel C, Kappeler P (2010) Conceptual and methodological issues in the comparative study of collective group movements. Behav Process 84:681–684
Pyritz LW, King AJ, Sueur C, Fichtel C (2011) Reaching a consensus: terminology and concepts used in coordination and decision-making research. Int J Primatol 32:1268–1278
R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org
Reichert KE, Heistermann M, Keith Hodges J, Boesch C, Hohmann G (2002) What females tell males about their reproductive status: are morphological and behavioural cues reliable signals of ovulation in bonobos (Pan paniscus)? Ethology 108:583–600
Ryu H, Hill DA, Furuichi T (2015) Prolonged maximal sexual swelling in wild bonobos facilitates affiliative interactions between females. Behaviour 152:285–311
Sakamaki T, Behncke I, Laporte M, Mulavwa M, Ryu H, Takemoto H, Tokuyama N, Yamamoto S, Furuichi T (2015) Intergroup transfer of females and social relationships between immigrants and residents in bonobo (Pan paniscus) societies. In: Furuichi T, Yamagiwa J, Aureli F (eds) Dispersing primate females. Springer, Tokyo, pp 127–164
Schaller GB (1963) The mountain gorilla: ecology and behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Smith JE, Kolowski JM, Graham KE, Dawes SE, Holekamp KE (2008) Social and ecological determinants of fission–fusion dynamics in the spotted hyaena. Anim Behav 76:619–636
Smith JE, Estrada JR, Richards HR, Dawes SE, Mitsos K, Holekamp KE (2015) Collective movements, leadership and consensus costs at reunions in spotted hyaenas. Anim Behav 105:187–200
Squires VR, Daws GT (1975) Leadership and dominance relationships in Merino and Border Leicester sheep. Appl Anim Ethol 1:263–274
Stevens JMG, Vervaecke H, de Vries H, van Elsacker L (2006) Social structures in Pan paniscus: testing the female bonding hypothesis. Primates 47:210–217
Stevens JMG, Vervaecke H, Vries H, van Elsacker L (2007) Sex differences in the steepness of dominance hierarchies in captive bonobo groups. Int J Primatol 28:1417–1430
Stueckle S, Zinner D (2008) To follow or not to follow: decision making and leadership during the morning departure in chacma baboons. Anim Behav 75:1995–2004
Sueur C, Petit O (2008) Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques? Behav Process 78:84–92
Sueur C, King AJ, Pelé M, Petit O (2013a) Fast and accurate decisions as a result of scale-free network properties in two primate species. In: Gilbert T, Kirkilionis M, Nicolis G (eds) Proceedings of the European Conference on Complex Systems 2012. Springer, New York, pp 579–584
Sueur C, MacIntosh AJJ, Jacobs AT, Watanabe K, Petit O (2013b) Predicting leadership using nutrient requirements and dominance rank of group members. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:457–470
Sumpter DJT (2006) The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philos T Roy Soc B 361:5–22
Surbeck M, Hohmann G (2013) Intersexual dominance relationships and the influence of leverage on the outcome of conflicts in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1767–1780
Surbeck M, Mundry R, Hohhman G (2011) Mothers matter! Maternal support, dominance status and mating success in male bonobos (Pan paniscus). Proc R Soc Lond B 278:590–598
Tokuyama N, Furuichi T (2016) Do friends help each other? Patterns of female coalition formation in wild bonobos at Wamba. Anim Behav 119:27–35
Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine Press, Chicago, pp 136–179
Vervaecke H, de Vries H, van Elsacker L (2000) Dominance and its behavioral measures in a captive group of bonobos (Pan paniscus). Int J Primatol:2147–2168
Vugt MV (2006) Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 10:354–371
Wang X, Sun L, Sheeran LK, Sun BH, Zhang QX, Zhang D, Xia DP, Li JH (2016) Social rank versus affiliation: which is more closely related to leadership of group movements in Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana)? Am J Primatol 78:816–824
Watts DP (2000) Mountain gorilla habitat use strategies and group movements. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 351–374
White FJ (1988) Party composition and dynamics in Pan paniscus. Int J Primatol 9:179–193
White FJ (1998) Seasonality and socioecology: the importance of variation in fruit abundance to bonobo sociality. Int J Primatol 19:1013–1027
White FJ, Wood KD (2007) Female feeding priority in bonobos, Pan paniscus, and the question of female dominance. Am J Primatol 69:837–850
Yamagiwa J, Kahekwa J, Basabose AK (2003) Intra-specific variation in social organization of gorillas: implications for their social evolution. Primates 44:359–369
Acknowledgements
We thank the Research Centre for Ecology and Forestry and the Ministry of Scientific Research, Democratic Republic of the Congo. We especially thank our local assistants, Iyokango Bahanande, Emikei Besao, Bafike Batuafe, Isolumbo Batoafe, and Mboka Batondonga, for their help in the forest. We thank Tetsuya Sakamaki, Mbomba Bekeli, Takakazu Yumoto, Shinya Yamamoto, Cintia Garai, Heungjin Ryu, Kirsty Graham, Saeko Terada, and Kazuya Toda for their help during field research and for their fruitful discussions. We thank members of the Ecology and Social Behavior section of the Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was financially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) ITP-HOPE Project (to NT), JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientist (to NT), and Global Leadership Training Program in Africa provided by United Nations University (to NT), and JSPS Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research (to TF).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Our study was approved by the Ministry of Scientific Research, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and conformed to the Guidelines for Field Research established by the Ethics Committee of the Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University. Our investigation followed the International Primatological Society guidelines for the study of non-human primates.
Additional information
Communicated by M. A. van Noordwijk
Electronic supplementary material
Supplemental Table 1
(DOCX 16 kb).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tokuyama, N., Furuichi, T. Leadership of old females in collective departures in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2277-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2277-5