Introduction

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a condition affecting the subchondral bone with secondary effects on articular cartilage that results in pain, effusions, and loose fragment formation. The OCD of the knee causes knee pain and dysfunction among skeletally immature (juvenile) and young adult patients [1]. Several aetiologies of knee OCD have been proposed, including repetitive microtrauma, genetics, vascular, mechanical axis malalignment, and discoid lateral meniscus [2, 3]. Based on the histological findings, the initial change in OCD is bone necrosis or subchondral fracture [4]. Management of knee OCD includes nonoperative measures or operative procedures such as drilling, fragment fixation, and osteochondral autograft (allograft) [1]. Internal fixation of an OCD loose fragment using bioabsorbable screws, pins, and osteochondral plugs shows excellent clinical outcomes and high healing rates [1, 5]. On the other hand, osteochondral loose fragments derived from spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK) are usually removed by surgically [6]. SONK is clinically characterised by a sudden onset of severe knee pain in elderly patients. Traumatic and vascular theories have been proposed as a causative factor of SONK involving a subchondral fracture of the femoral condyle [6]. Histological analyses have revealed that osteonecrotic lesions between the subchondral fracture line and the articular surface are observed in the advanced stage of SONK [7]. Conservative treatments that include protected weight-bearing and the use of bisphosphonate are effective in the early stage of SONK [8]. In the progressive and advanced stages of SONK, surgical treatments that include drilling, core decompression, artificial bone graft, osteochondral autograft (allograft), high tibial osteotomy, and unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty may be required [6, 9]. We have previously demonstrated that SONK loose fragment chondrocytes have a low potential for cellular proliferation and redifferentiation [10]. However, the differences among normal cartilage-, OCD-, and SONK-derived chondrocytes remain unclear in their regeneration potentials. Human chondrocytes isolated from detached OCD fragments maintain similar cell viability to those from healthy normal cartilages [11]. On the other hand, the chondrogenic redifferentiation potential of horse OCD-derived chondrocytes seems to be inferior to that of normal chondrocytes because OCD chondrocytes show lower expression of a chondrogenic transcription factor, Sry-type high-mobility-group box (SOX) 9 [12]. In this study, we investigated proliferative activity, redifferentiation ability, and expression of chondrogenic marker genes in chondrocytes derived from normal cartilage, OCD loose fragments, and SONK loose fragments.

Methods

Tissues, cells, and cell culture

Normal articular cartilage was obtained at notchplasty in patients (13, 18, 19, and 21 years of age) undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (n = 4). Unnecessary parts of loose fragments in knee OCD (15, 15, 15, and 21 years of age) were obtained at arthroscopy (n = 4). Osteonecrotic loose fragments were obtained at knee arthroplasty in patients (62, 64, 65, and 66 years of age) suffering from SONK (n = 4). Demographic data of the patients are shown as Table 1. This study received the approval of our Institutional Review Board and patients gave their informed consent for this research. The diagnosis was established according to clinical findings and magnetic resonance imaging. The OCD lesions were arthroscopically evaluated by the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification (ICRS OCD II, III, IV, and IV in each patient; Table 1) [13]. Radiographic stages of SONK (stage III in all patients) were assessed by Koshino’s classification (Table 1) [9]. Articular cartilage was carefully separated from osteochondral fragments. Normal and loose fragment chondrocytes were prepared by collagenase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) digestion [14]. Cells were maintained with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Wako, Osaka, Japan) containing foetal bovine serum (HyClone, South Logan, UT) and penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma). Chondrocytes between passage one and three were used in this study. Tissue samples were fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde-buffered solution. Decalcified paraffin-embedded tissue sections were prepared for histological analyses.

Table 1 Demographic data

Cell proliferation assay

Cell proliferation assays were performed as described [15]. In brief, cultured cells were plated as 2.5 × 103 cells/well and incubated for 12 hours. Then, cells were harvested for 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours before addition of water soluble tetrazolium (WST)-1 reagents (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Optical density (OD) was measured by a iMark microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) after three-hour treatment of WST-1. Data were obtained by subtracting 630-nm readings from 450-nm readings for evaluation. The mean value derived from wells was evaluated.

In vitro differentiation and histological analyses

In vitro differentiation was performed as described [16]. For chondrogenic redifferentiation, pelleted micromass culture was performed. Pellet-cultured cells (5 × 105 cells/pellet) were maintained in the chondrogenic induction medium supplemented with 10 ng/ml of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 (kindly provided from Pfizer, New York, NY) and transforming growth factor-β3 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) for three weeks [17]. Proteoglycans in pellets were observed with safranin O staining. Redifferentiation potential was assessed by the Bern pellet histology score (range, 0–9) [18, 19]. To assess the effect of tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), we performed in vitro differentiation analysis for the other mesenchymal lineages. To induce adipogenic differentiation, confluent cells were cultured with adipogenesis induction and maintenance media for three weeks according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Lipid vacuoles were stained with oil red O solution [20]. Osteogenic induction was performed using MSC osteogenesis kit (Millipore) and 1 ng/ml of BMP-2 for three weeks. Calcium deposition was visualised by von Kossa staining. Tissue specimens of osteochondral fragments were immunostained by a rabbit anti-CD166 antibody (ALCAM H-108, 1:100, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA) for detecting a cell surface marker of MSCs and progenitor cells [21]. Staining density of oil red O, von Kossa, and CD166 was quantified by Image J 1.31 [15]. Relative staining density was normalised by a mean value derived from five different images of SONK chondrocytes. The CD166-positive cell ratio was evaluated by a microscopic counting of chondrocytes in five different areas.

Quantitative real-time PCR analyses

RNAs purified from chondrogenic pellets were reverse-transcribed with ReverTra Ace (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). Quantitative real-time PCR analyses were performed using LightCycler ST-300 and FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I kit (Roche). Chondrogenic redifferentiation was assessed using the primers for SOX9, SOX5/6, and α1(II) collagen (COL2A1) [16, 20]. Amplification of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH) was used for normalisation [16]. The cycle number crossing the signal threshold was selected in the linear part of the amplification curve. Relative mRNA levels were normalised with the level of SONK-derived pellets.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were repeated three times and similar results were obtained. The data presented in the Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4 were derived from the same patients (normal, 18 years old; OCD, 15 years old; SONK, 66 years old). Data were expressed as means with standard deviations. Mean values were compared with a one-way ANOVA. Post hoc comparisons were performed using the Tukey test. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Normal chondrocytes and OCD loose fragment chondrocytes showed a higher proliferative activity than SONK loose fragment chondrocytes in cell proliferation assays. Normal chondrocytes (a). OCD-derived chondrocytes (b). SONK-derived chondrocytes (c). *p < 0.05

Fig. 2
figure 2

Normal and OCD chondrogenic pellets produced the larger amount of safranin O-stained proteoglycans compared with SONK pellets (ac, red). Lipid vacuoles were observed in normal and OCD chondrocytes after adipogenic induction (a and b, red). Calcium depositions were induced by osteogenic treatments in normal cartilage- and OCD-derived cells (a and b, brown). On the other hand, neither adipogenesis nor osteogenesis was induced in SONK-derived cells (c). The Bern pellet histology score was higher in normal and OCD pellets than in SONK pellets (d). Staining density of oil red O and von Kossa was lower in SONK-derived cells than in normal and OCD chondrocytes after the treatment of adipogenic and osteogenic induction (e and f). Bars, 100 μm. *p < 0.05

Fig. 3
figure 3

Expression pattern of chondrogenic marker genes. Expression of COL2A1 and SOX9 was more activated in normal and OCD chondrogenic pellets than in SONK pellets (a and b). However, the difference among normal, OCD, and SONK chondrogenic pellets was not observed in SOX5/6 expression (c and d). *p < 0.05

Fig. 4
figure 4

CD166, a MSC surface marker, was detected in the cells of normal and loose fragment cartilages (ac, brown in the transitional zone of articular cartilage). Normal cartilage (a). OCD loose fragment (b). SONK loose fragment (c). Negative control in the absence of an anti-CD166 antibody (d). CD166-positive cell ratio was higher in normal cartilages and OCD fragments than in SONK fragments (e). Normal cartilages and OCD fragments showed higher staining densities of CD166 compared with SONK loose fragment cartilages (f). Bars, 100 μm. *p < 0.05

Results

Proliferative activity of chondrocytes

Chondrocytes derived from normal cartilages and OCD loose fragments showed a higher proliferative activity than SONK chondrocytes (Fig. 1a–c). OCD chondrocytes showed a similar proliferative activity to normal chondrocytes (Fig. 1a and b). On the other hand, cellular proliferation of SONK chondrocytes was inferior to that of normal chondrocytes (Fig. 1a and c).

Redifferentiation potential of chondrocytes

In vitro differentiation analyses revealed that normal and OCD chondrogenic pellets produced the larger amount of proteoglycans compared with SONK-derived pellets (Fig. 2a–c). The Bern pellet histology score was higher in normal and OCD chondrocyte-derived pellets than in SONK chondrogenic pellets (Fig. 2d). Lipid vacuoles were observed in normal and OCD chondrocytes after adipogenic induction (Fig. 2a and b). In addition, osteogenic treatments induced calcium depositions in normal cartilage-derived cells and OCD loose fragment cells (Fig. 2a and b). On the other hand, neither adipogenesis nor osteogenesis was induced in SONK loose fragment-derived cells (Fig. 2c). Staining density of oil red O and von Kossa was lower in SONK-derived cells than in normal cartilage- and OCD-derived cells after the induction for each mesenchymal lineage (Fig. 2e and f). Gene expression pattern indicated that redifferentiation potential of OCD chondrocytes was higher than that of SONK chondrocytes (Fig. 3). Expression of COL2A1 and SOX9 was more activated in normal and OCD chondrogenic pellets than SONK pellets (Fig. 3a and b). However, expression of SOX5/6 was not highly induced in normal and OCD pellets by chondrogenic treatments (Fig. 3c and d).

CD166-positive cells in loose fragment cartilages

CD166, a MSC surface marker, was detected in chondrocytes packaged in normal cartilages (Fig. 4a). In addition, CD166-positive cells were observed in loose fragment cartilages of OCD and SONK (Fig. 4b and c). However, CD166-positive cell ratio was higher in normal cartilages and OCD loose fragments than in SONK-derived fragments (Fig. 4e). Relative CD166 staining density was also higher in normal and OCD cartilage samples than in SONK loose fragments (Fig. 4f).

Discussion

Osteonecrotic loose fragment and unstable cartilage flap in SONK are usually removed at surgical treatment [6, 9]. On the other hand, fixation of OCD loose fragment shows excellent clinical outcomes and high healing rates [1, 5]. However, these reports have not mentioned the difference between SONK- and OCD-derived loose fragment chondrocytes in cellular potential. This study has demonstrated that OCD loose fragment chondrocytes maintained similar proliferative and redifferentiation potentials as normal chondrocytes and that SONK loose fragment chondrocytes showed a lower activity in cellular proliferation and redifferentiation.

Monolayer-cultured articular chondrocytes leads to a process of dedifferentiation whereby the cells acquire a fibroblastic morphology and lose their chondrocytic properties [22]. The expression of chondrocyte-specific genes, such as COL2A1, aggrecan, SOX9, and SOX5/6, is gradually down-regulated during cell multiplication in monolayer culture conditions [22]. We previously demonstrated that COL2A1 expression was not detected in monolayer-cultured (dedifferentiated) SONK chondrocytes, whereas type II collagen deposition and COL2A1 expression were observed in tissue samples of SONK loose fragment cartilages [10]. Aging also influences cellular properties. Aged human chondrocytes are inferior to juvenile chondrocytes in producing cartilage-specific extracellular matrix [23]. In cell proliferation and chondrogenic redifferentiation, aged human chondrocytes show lower cellular potentials rather than chondrocytes derived from younger donors [24]. Our study demonstrated that aged SONK chondrocytes are inferior to normal and OCD chondrocytes in cellular proliferation (Fig. 1). In addition, three-dimensional-cultured SONK chondrocytes showed lower chondrogenic phenotypes than normal cartilage- and OCD-derived chondrogenic pellets (Figs. 2 and 3). On the other hand, OCD loose fragment chondrocytes maintained similar chondrogenic phenotypes to normal articular chondrocytes (Figs. 2 and 3). These findings suggest that chondrocyte aging may be a key factor in reducing its proliferative activity and redifferentiation potential.

The MSCs are multipotent cells that differentiate into chondrogenic, adipogenic, and osteogenic lineages [25]. Several tissue-derived MSCs, such as bone marrow, synovium, adipose, ligament, and meniscus, are candidates for a cell source of regeneration for damaged tissue [16, 20, 25]. However, few reports have investigated the cellular behavior of MSCs packaged in articular cartilage [21, 26]. The literature focuses on CD166 as a biomarker to identify cartilage-derived MSCs and/or progenitor cells in both normal and osteoarthritic cartilages [21, 26]. Primary cell culture from aged osteoarthritic cartilages (ranged from 59 to 87 years old) shows a higher rate of CD105/CD166-positive progenitor cells than that from younger normal cartilages (ranged from 17 to 39 years old) [26]. On the other hand, Pretzel et al. have demonstrated that the ratio of CD105/CD166-positive progenitor cells is similar between osteoarthritic chondrocytes and normal chondrocytes using flow cytometry [21]. The percentage of CD166-positive cells is also similar between osteoarthritic and normal cartilage in immunohistological analysis [21]. In our study, CD166-positive cell ratio and relative CD166 staining density were higher in OCD fragments and normal cartilages than in SONK loose fragments (Fig. 4). These findings suggest that CD166-positive cell ratio is not determined in an age-dependent manner. The ratio of CD166-positive cells might represent the status of intrinsic repair capacity in articular cartilage. We consider that the healing potential of osteoarthritic chondrocytes might be preserved (or transiently activated) by an excessive mechanical stress. However, CD166-positive cells might not be induced in SONK detached fragment chondrocytes for lack of mechanical loading. The MSCs secrete a variety of growth factors that stimulate mitosis and differentiation of tissue-intrinsic progenitor cells [27]. The MSC-mediated trophic effect is distinct from the direct differentiation of MSCs into repairing tissue. On the other hand, cryopreserved human cartilage fragments promote chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived MSCs in a nude mouse transplantation model [28]. These findings suggest that the interaction between CD166-positive cells and primitive MSCs may have an essential role in enhancing cartilage repair. However, further studies involved in the other MSC markers, such as CD44, 73, 90, and 105, will be required to understand the precise role of cartilage-derived progenitor cells and MSCs.

Chondrogenic differentiation and maturation are cooperatively regulated by several transcription factors and coactivators [17, 29, 30]. Chondrogenic master transcription factor SOX9 positively regulates the expression of its target genes through the association with the consensus DNA sequences (WWCAAWG) on promoters and enhancers of cartilage-specific genes, such as COL2A1, α1(IX), α2(XI) collagen, aggrecan, and cartilage link protein [30]. The SOX9-associating coactivators including p300, Smad3, and E47 have important roles in modulating SOX9-dependent transcriptional activation [30]. Our results indicated that SOX9 expression was higher in normal and OCD chondrocytes than in SONK chondrocytes during the redifferentiation procedure (Fig. 3). However, the expression of SOX9-supporting molecule SOX5/6 in normal cartilage- and OCD-derived chondrogenic pellets was similar to that in SONK-derived pellets (Fig. 3). These findings suggest that SOX9-associating molecules and other chondrogenic factors except SOX5/6 would have fundamental roles in enhancing chondrogenic redifferentiation.

In conclusion, our experimental study has demonstrated that articular chondrocytes derived from normal cartilage and detached OCD loose fragments maintained higher proliferative activity and redifferentiation potential compared with SONK loose fragment chondrocytes. Our results suggest that the proliferative and redifferentiation properties of chondrocytes and the amount of CD166-positive cells in loose fragment cartilages may affect the repair process of osteochondral defects.