Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare a fast spin-echo sequence combined with a respiratory triggering device (R. trig. FSE) with conventional T2-weighted spin-echo (CSE) and inversion recovery (STIR) sequences for the detection of focal hepatic lesions.
Methods: We performed a prospective study of 33 consecutive patients with known or suspected hepatic tumors. All patients underwent R. trig. FSE, CSE, and STIR imaging at 1.5 T. Acquisition times were 10.7 min for the CSE sequence and ranged from 12 to 15 min for STIR and from 5 to 7 min for R. trig FSE. For each sequence, live-spleen contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and liver-lesion CNR were determined quantitatively. Image artifact and sharpness were graded by using a four-point scale on each sequence by two independent readers. Both readers also independently identified hepatic lesions (up to a maximum of eight per patient). For patients with focal lesions, the total number of lesions detected (on each sequence) and the minimum size of detected lesions were also determined by each reader.
Results: No significant difference was detected between R. trig. FSE and CSE or STIR in either liver-spleen CNR or liver-lesion CNR. R. trig. FSE images were equivalent to CSE and superior to STIR in sharpness (p <0.01) and presence of artifact (p<0.01). R. trig. FSE detected a higher number of lesions (reader 1: n=92, reader 2: n=86) than CSE (reader 1: n=70, reader 2: n=69) and a significantly higher number than STIR (reader 1: n=71, reader 2: n=76). Lesion structure was significantly better defined with R. trig. FSE than with STIR (p<0.01) and CSE (p<0.05).
Conclusions: Compared with CSE and STIR, R. trig. FSE produces hepatic images of comparable resolution and detects an increased number of focal hepatic lesions in a shorter period of time.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Foley WD, Kneeland JB, Cates JD, et al. Contrast optimization for the detection of focal hepatic lesions by MR imaging at 1.5 T. AJR 1987; 149:1155–1160
Ehman RL, McNamara MT, Brasch RC, et al. Influence of physiologic motion on the appearance of tissue in MR imaging. Radiology 1986;159:777–782
Mitchell DG, Vinitski S, Burk DL, et al. Motion artifact reduction in MR imaging of the abdomen: gradient moment nulling versus respiratory-sorted phase encoding. Radiology 1988;169:155–160
Outwater EK, Mitchell DG, Vinitski S. Abdominal MR imaging: evaluation of a fast spin-echo sequence. Radiology 1994;190:425–429
Low RN, Francis IR, Sigeti JS, et al. Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging. Radiology 1993;186:803–811
Catasca JV, Mirowitz SA. T2-weighted MR imaging of the abdomen: fast spin-echo vs conventional spin-echo sequences. AJR 1994;162:61–67
Nghiem HV, Herfkens RJ, Francis IR, et al. The pelvis: T2-weighted fast spin echo MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:213–217
Schwartz LH, Seltzer SE, Tempany CMC, et al. Prospective comparison of T2-weighted fast spin-echo, with and without fat suppression, and convetional spin-echo pulse sequences in the upper abdomen. Radiology 1993;189:411–416
van Vaals JJ, van Yperen GH. Optimization of T2-weighted turbo spin echo in breath-holding imaging [Abstract]. JMRI 1992;2(P):104
Rofsky NM, Weinreb JC, Haddad JL. T2-weighted breath-hold fat-suppressed RARE (turbo SE) imaging of the liver with 15 mT/m gradients at 1.0T [Abstract]. JMRI 1993;3(P):68
Lewis CE, Prato FS, Drost DJ, et al. Comparison of respiratory triggering and gating techniques for the removal of respiratory artifacts in MR imaging. Radiology 1986;160:803–810
Reinig JW, Dwyer AJ, Miller DL, et al. Liver metastases: detection with MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T. Radiology 1989;170:149–153
Steinberg HV, Alarcon JJ, Bernardino ME. Focal hepatic lesions: comparative MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T. Radiology 1990;174:153–156
Paulson EK, Baker ME, Paine SS, et al. Detection of focal hepatic masses. STIR MR Vs. CT during arterial portography. JCAT 1994;18(4):581–587
Constable RT, Anderson AW, Zhong J, et al. Factors influencing contrast in fast spin-echo MR imaging. Mag Res Imag 1991;10:497–511
Spritzer CE, Keogan MK, MacFall J, Dahlke J. Optimizing FSE acquisition for hepatic imaging [Abstract]. JMRI 1994;4(P):43
Stark DD, Hendrick RE, Hahn PF, et al. Motion artifact reduction with fast spin-echo imaging. Radiology 1987;164:183–191
Kaufman L, Kramer DM, Crooks LE, et al. Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging. Radiology 1989;173:265–267
Semelka RC, Simm FC, Recht M, et al. T1-weighted sequences for MR imaging of the liver: comparison of three techniques for single-breath, whole-volume acquisition at 1.0 and 1.5T. Radiology 1991;180:629–635
Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg H. RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Mag Res Med 1986;3:823–833
Constable RT, Smith RC, Gore JC. Signal-to-noise and contrast in fast spin echo (FSE) and inversion recovery FSE imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:41–47
Mulkern RV, Wong STS, Winalski C, et al. Contrast manipulation and artifact assessment of 2D and 3D rare sequences. Mag Res Imag 1990;8:557–566
Winkler ML, Thoeni RF, Luh N, et al. Hepatic neoplasia: breath-hold MR imaging. Radiology 1989;170:801–806
Runge VM, Clanton JA, Partain CL, et al. Respiratory gating in magnetic resonance imaging at 0.5 Tesla. Radiology 1984;151:521–523
Ehman RL, McNamara MT, Pallack M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging with respiratory gating: techniques and advantages. AJR 1984;143:1175–1182
Wernecke K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G, et al. Detection of hepatic masses in patients with carcinoma: comparative sensitivities of sonography, CT, and MR imaging. AJR 1991;157:731–739
Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Sugarbaker PH, et al. Hepatic tumors: comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT, and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation. Radiology 1989;172:27–34
Constable RT, Gore JC. The loss of small objects in variable TE imaging: implications for FSE, RARE, and EPI. Mag Res Med 1992;28:9–24
Egglin TK, Rummeny E, Stark DD, et al. Hepatic tumors: quantitative tissue characterization with MR imaging. Radiology 1990;176:107–110
Itoh K, Saini S, Hahn PF, et al. Differentiation between small hepatic hemangiomas and metastases on MR images: importance of size-specific quantitative criteria. AJR 1990;155:61–66
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keogan, M.T., Spritzer, C.E., Paulson, E.K. et al. Liver MR imaging: comparison of respiratory triggered fast spin echo with T2-weighted spin-echo and inversion recovery. Abdom Imaging 21, 433–439 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900098
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900098