Abstract
Purpose
Although lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) directed therapies demonstrate promising clinical anti-cancer activity, only a subset of patients seems to benefit and predictive biomarkers are lacking. Here, we explored the potential use of the anti-LAG-3 antibody tracer [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 as a predictive imaging biomarker and investigated its target specific uptake as well as the correlation of its tumor uptake and the tumor immune infiltration.
Methods
Patients with head and neck (N = 2) or lung cancer (N = 4) were included in an imaging substudy of a phase 1 trial with BI 754091 (anti-PD-1) and BI 754111 (anti-LAG-3). After baseline tumor biopsy and [18F]FDG-PET, patients were given 240 mg of BI 754091, followed 8 days later by administration of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 (37 MBq, 4 mg). PET scans were performed 2 h, 96 h, and 144 h post-injection. To investigate target specificity, a second tracer administration was given two weeks later, this time with pre-administration of 40 (N = 3) or 600 mg (N = 3) unlabeled BI 754111, followed by PET scans at 96 h and 144 h post-injection. Tumor immune cell infiltration was assessed by immunohistochemistry and RNA sequencing.
Results
Tracer uptake in tumors was clearly visible at the 4-mg mass dose (tumor-to-plasma ratio 1.63 [IQR 0.37-2.89]) and could be saturated by increasing mass doses (44 mg: 0.67 [IQR 0.50–0.85]; 604 mg: 0.56 [IQR 0.42–0.75]), demonstrating target specificity. Tumor uptake correlated to immune cell-derived RNA signatures.
Conclusions
[89Zr]Zr-BI-754111 PET imaging shows favorable technical and biological characteristics for developing a potential predictive imaging biomarker for LAG-3-directed therapies.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03780725. Registered 19 December 2018
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3, CD233) is an inhibitory receptor that can be found on the surface of T-cells, Tregs, NK-cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and tumor-associated macrophages [1,2,3]. The binding of LAG-3 to its canonical ligand, major histocompatibility protein II, initiates inhibitory downstream signaling in T-cells and can contribute to immune escape [4, 5]. Expression of LAG-3 can be found on cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of various solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), and is commonly associated with a more aggressive tumor type and poor prognosis [6, 7]. Moreover, upregulation of LAG-3 expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been suggested as a resistance marker to anti-programmed death 1 (anti-PD-1) treatment in patients who initially respond well to this treatment [8, 9]. In light of these findings, LAG-3 has been studied extensively as a potential druggable target—especially for dual checkpoint blockade with anti-PD-1 and anti-LAG-3—which has yielded promising results in preclinical studies [10,11,12,13]. Even more encouraging, a recent clinical study demonstrated that relatlimab (an anti-LAG-3 monoclonal antibody [mAb]) in combination with nivolumab (an anti-PD-1 mAb) improved progression-free survival in first-line advanced melanoma patients over nivolumab monotherapy, consequently resulting in Food and Drug Administration approval of this treatment [14]. Currently, over 100 clinical trials comprising LAG-3 blocking treatments are ongoing in various solid and hematological malignancies [9].
Although anti-LAG-3 is a promising immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), not all patients benefit and there is a clear clinical need for the development of predictive biomarkers. One modality that could provide such biomarkers is positron emission tomography (PET) using radiolabeled mAbs, which we introduced previously using the positron emitter 89Zr, i.e., 89Zr-immuno-PET [15]. The potential of 89Zr-immuno-PET to evaluate the biodistribution and tumor uptake of ICIs is being demonstrated in an ever-growing number of clinical trials. Two separate studies involving radiolabeled anti-PD-1 mAbs ([89Zr]Zr-nivolumab [16] and [89Zr]Zr-pembrolizumab [17], showed that a higher tumor uptake correlated with a favorable treatment outcome. Similarly, tumor uptake with [89Zr]Zr-atezolizumab (anti-programmed death ligand 1 [anti-PD-L1] mAb) positively correlated with response to atezolizumab treatment, outperforming immunohistochemistry (IHC) in this regard [18]. Although these were pilot studies with limited sample sizes, they highlight the potential of 89Zr-immuno-PET to generate predictive biomarkers for ICIs.
To apply the 89Zr-immuno-PET method to an anti-LAG-3 mAb would be highly interesting. However, based on the literature, the availability of LAG-3 targets in the tumor microenvironment is expected to be rather low (0.41 ng/mg in cervical tumors) as compared to other targets, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-2 (12–800 ng/mg in breast cancer) or MET (22–700 ng/mg in NSCLC) [19, 20]. This has questioned whether an anti-LAG-3 PET tracer would yield a sufficiently quantifiable and target-specific signal for LAG-3 expression. Despite this uncertainty, investigating the biomarker value of LAG-3 PET can be justified, as 89Zr-immuno-PET may still perform well due to the residualizing characteristics of 89Zr after target-specific binding and internalization of 89Zr-mAb, which might result in an enhancement of the PET signal upon synthesis and membrane translocation of new LAG-3 receptors during imaging [21, 22].
Therefore, in this study, we investigated 89Zr-immuno-PET imaging using a 89Zr-labeled anti-LAG-3 mAb ([89Zr]Zr-BI 754111). Firstly, we evaluated the feasibility of visualizing and quantifying the biodistribution and tumor uptake of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111. Secondly, the effect of administering additional unlabeled BI 754111 pre-tracer injection was explored to provide evidence for target-specific uptake [23], and potentially target saturation—which might also help to inform decisions on a recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in the absence of acute toxicities [24]. Thirdly, we correlated tracer uptake to TME immune features through IHC and RNA-sequencing signatures.
Patients and methods
Patient selection
Patients with advanced stage HNSCC and NSCLC, who had progressed on previous anti-PD-(L)1-based treatment, after having initially experienced at least 3 months of stable disease on this treatment, were included in this study. Additionally, eligible patients needed to have at least one lesion that was approachable for biopsy and that was evaluable with PET (≥ 20 mm, outside of the liver). Other key inclusion criteria included measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 and iRECIST, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, life expectancy of at least 12 weeks, and age ≥ 18 years. Exclusion criteria were inadequate organ function or bone marrow reserve, significant cardiovascular disease, history of pneumonitis within the last 5 years, history of interstitial lung disease, history of severe hypersensitivity to other mAbs, history of auto-immune disease excluding vitiligo or resolved childhood asthma/atopy, active infection requiring systemic treatment, history of human immunodeficiency virus infection, active hepatitis B or C virus infection, not having fully recovered from major surgery, necessary major surgery planned 12 months after inclusion, use of restricted medications (defined as any other anticancer agent, systemic immunosuppressive medications including > 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent, and/or any herbal medications), planning to receive live attenuated vaccines during the trial, chronic alcohol or drug abuse, and pregnancy or expecting pregnancy during the trial.
Study design
Screening procedures included a tumor biopsy and a standard 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) scan, performed according to European Association of Nuclear Medicine guidelines 2.0 [25]. Within two weeks after the [18F]FDG PET/CT scan, patients received their first treatment cycle, which consisted of 240 mg of the anti-PD-1 antibody ezabenlimab (C1D1), recreating the conditions under which progression initially occurred. One week thereafter (C1D8), the zirconium-89-labelled LAG-3 tracer ([89Zr]Zr-BI 754111) was administered, which contained 37 MBq of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 and 4 mg of BI 754111. Whole-body PET/CT scans were obtained < 2, 90 ± 1, and 138 ± 1 h post-injection (p.i.). Three weeks after the start of the first cycle, patients received the second treatment cycle consisting of 240 mg of ezabenlimab and either 40 mg (N = 3) or 600 mg (N = 3) of the anti-LAG-3 antibody BI 754111 (C2D1). Directly thereafter (< 2 h), patients received a second administration of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111. PET/CT scans were acquired after 90 ± 1 and 138 ± 1 h. Summarizing, three mass doses of [89Zr]Zr-BI 75411 were investigated within this protocol: 4 mg in cycle 1, followed by 44 mg in cycle 2 (N = 3) and 4 mg in cycle 1, followed by 604 mg in cycle 2 (N = 3). After completion of imaging procedures, patients continued with three-weekly treatment cycles of 240 mg of ezabenlimab and 600 mg of BI 754111 till disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Baseline CT scans for response assessment were performed either in combination with [18F]FDG-PET or 1 week prior to C2D1 and thereafter repeated every 6 weeks. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST v1.1 and iRECIST criteria [26, 27].
This prospective clinical trial was conducted at Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. All patients provided written informed consent. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, International Conference on Harmonization guidelines, and Good Clinical Practice quality standards [28, 29]. This trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov under the identifier NCT03780725.
Radioactivity measurements in plasma
Venous blood samples were drawn 1 h p.i. of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111, and after every PET scan. Radioactivity concentration in blood and plasma was measured in a cross-calibrated well counter and expressed as activity concentration (AC) [30].
Choice of used PET outcome measure
When comparing the effect of different BI 754111 mAb mass doses on [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 tumor uptake, standardized uptake value (SUV) is not considered to be a suitable outcome measure, as it assumes identical clearance between compared groups as well as a distribution volume that is larger than the one known for antibodies [31]. Thus, a relatively low expression as described for LAG-3 as well as small variations in target expression can be overshadowed by temporal differences in plasma availability of the tracer. One way to address this would be to perform a Patlak analysis on tumor data, using the plasma area under the curve as the input function. However, in contrast to normal organs [32], baseline net rate of irreversible uptake (Ki) values for tumors lacking target expression are not available so far, i.e., a Patlak analysis cannot be employed to derive Ki values for tumor lesion uptake. Thus, we reported the organ- and tumor-to-plasma ratios, which take the plasma concentration into account. The use and interpretation of tumor-to-plasma ratios continue to be further explored as well as more comprehensive methods to assess antibody tumor uptake. For organs, Ki values are reported.
Tracer synthesis and quality control
89Zr was purchased from Perkin-Elmer, Boston, MA, USA, and coupled to BI 754111 via the bifunctional chelator DFO-Bz-NCS (Macrocyclics) [33]. [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 was produced in compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practice at the Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc. The procedures for radiolabeling of BI 754111 with 89Zr have been validated with respect to the final quality of the prepared conjugate and the production process. Details can be found in the supplementary information.
Scan acquisition
Following low-dose CT scans for attenuation correction, whole-body PET scans were acquired from head to mid-thigh with a scan duration of 5 min per bed position, resulting in a total scan duration of approximately 60 min. PET/CT scans were performed either on a Gemini TOF-64 PET/CT scanner or a Vereos digital PET/CT (both from Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands).
Biodistribution analysis and Patlak linearization
To assess biodistribution, organs of interest were delineated, either manually (lungs, spleen, liver, kidneys, bone marrow) or automatically (bone) using the in-house developed BIODISTRIBUTION tool (developed in IDL version 8.4) and reported as organ-to-plasma ratios. In addition, organ activity concentrations in Bq/mL, in combination with activity concentrations from plasma, were used as input for Patlak linearization. The use of the Patlak linearization allows an estimate of reversible and irreversible contributions to measured activity in the region of interest. This approach was previously cross-validated for healthy organs using physiologically based pharmacokinetic models of mAbs [32]. From the Patlak linearization, Ki (in mL·g−1·min−1), which is a combination of target-specific and non-specific irreversible uptake, was extracted and reported.
Analysis of tumor uptake of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111
To analyze tumor uptake of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111, we used the in-house developed software ACCURATE [34] and followed a previously described standardized manual procedure for tumor segmentation [35]. In short, tumor lesions were scored by an experienced nuclear medicine physician (GZ) who was initially blinded for [18F]FDG-PET and diagnostic CT images. Tumor lesions on the [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 PET images were considered visually positive when focal uptake exceeded the local background. For quantification, max. 5 tumor lesions per patient were selected, with a diameter of at least 2 cm to minimize partial volume effects [36]. Volumes of interest were delineated on the PET image by the physician-researcher (IM) and verified by the nuclear medicine physician (GZ). For tumor accumulation, we report tumor-to-plasma ratios based on peak activity concentration.
LAG-3 IHC
IHC procedures and scoring for LAG-3 staining were carried out by Roche Diagnostics (Tucson, AZ, USA) using BenchMark ULTRA instrumentation and clone 17B4 (Abcam). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides were evaluated for tumor content and tissue quality. A minimum of 100 viable tumor cells was required for evaluation. LAG-3 staining was assessed for evaluability based on tissue and cell viability, morphology, and the presence of discernable background staining and scored as the percentage of positive immune cells per tumor area (0–100%). The tumor area included both intra-tumoral and peri-tumoral stroma.
RNA purification from FFPE
RNA was extracted by using the RNeasy® formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The starting material for RNA extraction was 10 FFPE sections with a 4–5-μm thickness each. First, paraffin was removed from FFPE tissue sections by treating with 1 mL of xylene. Next, samples were incubated at 56 °C in 150 μL of lysis buffer (+ 10 μL of proteinase K), to release RNA from the sections. A short incubation at 80 °C partially reversed formalin crosslinking of the released nucleic acids, improving RNA yield and quality, as well as RNA performance in downstream RNASeq library preparation. This was followed by DNase treatment (10 μL of 1500 units DNase) to eliminate genomic DNA, including very small DNA fragments. Thereafter, the lysate was mixed with 320 μL of a guanidine salt-containing buffer. A total of 720 μL of ethanol absolute was added to provide appropriate binding conditions for RNA, and the sample was then pipetted onto a RNeasy MinElute spin column (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), where the total RNA bound to the membrane and contaminants were washed out. RNA was then eluted in 20 μL of RNase-free water.
Determination of RNA concentration and quality check was performed by absorbance measurements at 260 nm and 280 nm using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The OD260/OD280 ratio was between 1.7 and 2.3.
RNA sequencing library preparation and sequencing
Sequencing libraries were prepared from 100 ng of total RNA by using the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Library Prep Kit with Ribo-Zero Gold according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Briefly, ribosomal RNA (rRNA) was removed using 5 μL biotinylated, target-specific oligos combined with 35 μL Ribo-Zero rRNA removal beads. A total of 8.5 μL of Elute-Prime-Fragment High Mix was added. As further fragmentation of FFPE RNA is not necessary, it was continued with first-strand synthesis. The RNA fragments were copied into first-strand cDNA using 8 μL of a mixture of 1 μL of SuperScript II reverse transcriptase and 9 μL of First Strand Synthesis Act D Mix (containing random primers), followed by second-strand cDNA synthesis using 20 μL of Second Strand Marking Master Mix containing DNA Polymerase I and RNase H. A single “A” nucleotide is added to the 3′ ends of the blunt fragments to prevent them from ligating to each other during the adapter ligation reaction by adding 12.5 μL of A-Tailing Mix. A corresponding single "T” nucleotide on the 3′ end of the adapter provides a complementary overhang for ligating the adapter to the fragment. Therefore 2.5 μL of Ligation Mix and 2.5 μL of the desired dual adapter were added. The products were purified and enriched by PCR (14 cycles) to create the final cDNA library. Library stock samples were diluted to 3 nM and samples with different indexes were pooled before clustering. The final sequencing Pool was diluted to 340 pM and loaded together with 0.6 μL of 2.5 nM PhiX Control v3 onto a SP flowcell (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
RNA sequencing data analysis
Sequencing output was demultiplexed following the standard recommendations by the manufacturer and subsequent FastQ files were processed using a custom in-house pipeline for RNAseq analysis. Quality control was performed using FastQC [37], reads were then mapped using STAR [38] to the human reference genome GRCh38 and counts were obtained using RSEM [39]. Subsequent normalization of reads was performed using DESeq2 [40]. The deconvolution analysis was performed using the immunedeconv toolkit [41]. Visualization of all results was performed using ggplot2 [42]. The gene scores for interferon (IFN)-gamma [43] and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) [44] used in this study were computed using the gene set variation analysis algorithm [45]. As the number of samples in the study was considered low, we performed a further distribution analysis of the gene expression of our investigated set of gene expression values and compared the distribution to the overall expression pattern of all detected genes in each sample to determine whether we randomly picked arbitrary expression outliers. The gene expression for the set of genes investigated does not lie on the extreme borders of the overall transcript per million distribution of the samples (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed in R software version 3.6.3 for Windows. Decay-corrected radioactivity counts (Bq/mL) were processed to percentage injected activity (%IA), SUV, or organ-/tumor-to-plasma ratios. For organs and plasma, this data was parametric and reported as a mean with standard deviation. Tumor uptake was non-parametric and reported as a median with interquartile range (IQR). Exact n values and used statistical tests are reported at each figure if appropriate. A p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Study procedures and patient demographics
Between March 2019 and September 2020, 8 patients (5 patients with NSCLC and 3 patients with HNSCC) were included. Two patients started treatment, but ultimately did not undergo imaging procedures due to clinical deterioration and technical problems. Eventually, 4 patients with NSCLC and 2 patients with HNSCC completed imaging procedures. Patients were 66 years old (median, range, 53–77) and had an ECOG performance status of 0 (N = 1) or 1 (N = 5). At the time of inclusion, all patients had disease progression after an initial clinical benefit (of at least 3 months of stable disease) or response on an anti-PD-1-containing treatment regimen. Study procedures included a pre-treatment biopsy, baseline [18F]FDG PET, restart of anti-PD-1 therapy (with ezabenlimab, 240 mg, three-weekly cycles), and, thereafter, sequential [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 PET imaging exploring three different mass doses of unlabeled BI 754111: 4 mg, 44 mg, and 604 mg (Fig. 1). After completion of imaging procedures, patients continued with three-weekly cycles of ezabenlimab (240 mg) and BI 754111 (600 mg) till disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Patient characteristics are detailed in Table 1.
Pharmacokinetic analysis
After each [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 PET scan, plasma samples were taken to measure ACs, expressed as %IA per L (%IA/L). The observed plasma ACs after administration of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 were in line with plasma concentrations predicted by a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model for unlabeled BI 754111, suggesting that the 89Zr-labeling was stable and did not change the properties or plasma exposure of BI 754111 (Fig. 2a). This popPK model was based on data from a previous phase I study (NCT03156114); parameters are shown in Supplementary Table 1. Next, plasma ACs were assessed at the 4-mg, 44-mg, and 604-mg mass dose. In cycle 1, at the 4-mg mass dose, the mean plasma AC was 6.2 ± 4.1 %IA/L 90 h p.i., declining to 3.2 ± 2.2 %IA/L 138 h p.i. In cycle 2, at the 44-mg and 604-mg mass dose, plasma ACs were higher than those at the 4-mg mass dose: at 90 h p.i. 11.9 ± 0.2 %IA/L and 14.5 ± 3.9 %IA/L, and at 138 h p.i. 10.0 %IA/L and 11.9 %IA/L, respectively, demonstrating a difference in clearance between these doses as was also predicted by the popPK model (Figs. 2b and c).
Biodistribution in healthy organs
PET images of the baseline [18F]FDG-PET, and two [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 PET scans from one representative patient for each mass dose group, are presented in Fig. 3a. High uptake of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 was visible in the gall bladder and bowel, consistent with hepatobiliary clearance. To quantify organ uptake under different mass doses, the preferred uptake parameter was the organ-to-plasma ratio. For completeness, SUV values are available in the supplementary information. Organ-to-plasma ratios at the 4-mg mass dose (cycle 1) at 138 h p.i. revealed high uptake in spleen (mean 19.9 ± 14.9) and low uptake in lungs (mean 0.36 ± 0.16) (Fig. 3b; Supplementary Table 2). Increasing the mass dose by adding unlabeled BI 754111 in cycle 2 resulted in spleen-to-plasma ratios to drop to mean 1.55 ± 0.82 at the 44-mg mass dose, and to further decline to mean 0.47 ± 0.21 at the 604-mg mass dose, indicating saturation of target-specific binding sites in the spleen. A complete overview of organ-to-plasma ratios as well as SUVs can be found in Supplementary Table 2. To distinguish irreversible from reversible uptake, Patlak linearization was performed, demonstrating a net irreversible uptake component (Ki) in the spleen at the 4-mg mass dose of 30.06 ± 11.17 μL g−1 h−1, which was partially saturated at the 44-mg mass dose (2.91 ± 0.79 μL g−1 h−1), and fully saturated at the 604-mg mass dose (0.67 ± 0.39 μL g−1 h−1), considering the baseline Ki values postulated by Jauw et al. (Supplementary Table 3) [32].
Uptake in tumor lesions
Patients underwent a baseline [18F]FDG PET and diagnostic CT scan to identify all tumor lesions with a diameter larger than 2 cm. Twenty tumor lesions (2–5 per patient), with an average tumor volume of 16.6 mL (range, 3.6–109.12 mL) and a mean SUVmax value of 9.01 ± 4.3, as assessed on [18F]FDG PET, were identified. Uptake of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 could be visualized in all 20 tumor lesions at the 4-mg dose showing a favorable tumor-to-background ratio (Fig. 3a). Tumor-to-plasma ratios at the 4-mg mass dose (in cycle 1) were 1.63 (IQR 0.37–2.89) 90 h p.i. and increased over time to a median of 2.70 (IQR 0.85–4.62) 138 h p.i. Adding unlabeled BI 754111 to reach mass doses of 44 mg and 604 mg (in cycle 2) significantly decreased tumor-to-plasma ratios 138 h p.i. to a median of 0.67 (IQR 0.50–0.85, p = 3.6*10−6) and 0.58 (IQR 0.42–0.75, p = 5*10−7), respectively (Figs. 3c and 4). Tumor-to-plasma ratios were not significantly different between the 44-mg and 604-mg doses (p = 0.88). Lymph node metastases, which potentially contain more/easily accessible LAG-3 expressing immune cells compared to other solid metastases, show higher uptake at 90 h p.i., but not at 138 h p.i. (Supplementary Fig. 2). SUVpeak values can be found in Supplementary Fig. 3. Additional PET images are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4.
Correlation of tumor uptake with IHC and RNA sequencing
Tumor-to-plasma ratios of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 at the 4-mg dose were used for correlation with translational analyses, to minimalize the influence of saturation effects. Pre-treatment biopsies were successfully collected for all patients, except for patient 3. Individual outcomes and corresponding patient characteristics are available in Table 2. Tumor uptake was heterogeneous at the 4-mg dose 138 h p.i.: 2 patients were at the low end of the spectrum (mean tumor-to-plasma ratio 0.8 and 1.4 for patients 6 and 9, respectively), and 4 patients (1, 2, 3, and 10) demonstrated a higher mean tumor uptake (mean tumor-to-plasma ratio ≥ 3.0 for all patients). PET scans for patients 1 and 6 are shown as examples in Fig. 5a and b. Immunohistochemical staining of biopsied lesions confirmed low percentages of LAG-3 positive immune cells per tumor area for patients 6 and 9 (≤ 1% and 5%, respectively), as compared to patients 1, 2, and 10 (10%, 5%, 30%, respectively), supporting the notion that low mean tumor uptake of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 corresponds to low abundancy of (LAG-3+) immune cells in the TME (Fig. 5c). Moreover, the mean low uptake of patients 6 and 9 coincided with a slightly faster tumor growth as demonstrated by the 48% and 64% increase in tumor volume at 12 weeks (Fig. 5d). All patients ultimately progressed within 18 weeks. Next, RNA-sequencing on baseline tumor biopsies was performed and cell deconvolution using quanTIseq revealed that the tumor lesions of patients 6 and 9 were practically void of conventional effector CD4 and CD8 T-cells and T-cell related mRNAs (Fig. 5e), whereas the other patients (patients 1, 2, and 10) did show a clear activated effector T-cell signature with relatively higher expression of immune checkpoints, including LAG-3 (Fig. 5f). Besides evidence of CD4 and CD8 T-cell presence in tumor biopsies from patients 1, 2, and 10, also a relative abundance of Tregs and B-cells was noted (Fig. 5e). A similar clustering of patients was found when looking at an RNA signature related to T-cell infiltration and T-cell priming in TLS, which have shown to have prognostic relevance in various solid tumor types including melanoma [44], oral squamous cell carcinoma [46], and NSCLC [47] (Supplementary Fig. 5). The presence of an IFN-gamma signature confirmed the activated state and apparent functionality of the detected T cells (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Clinical outcome and adverse events
Treatment was well tolerated; adverse events are shown in Supplementary Table 4 and are in line with the safety profile of checkpoint inhibitors. No objective responses were observed; the best clinical outcome was stable disease and was observed in 4 out of 8 patients.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first PET imaging study targeting LAG-3 in cancer patients. Even though the amount of LAG-3 targets in the TME is reportedly low [19], the PET signal in tumors at the 4-mg mass dose was clearly visible and target specific, two important requirements for a potential predictive imaging biomarker. At this dose, high uptake of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 was also noted in the spleen, again surpassing expectations based on reported protein expression of LAG-3 in the spleen [19, 20].
The discrepancy between the reported low protein expression of LAG-3 and the observed high PET uptake of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 may have several explanations. Firstly, all patients were restarted on ezabenlimab (anti-PD-1 mAb) treatment 8 days before tracer administration, which may have resulted in a (transient) increase in LAG-3 expression. Secondly, the intensity of the LAG-3 IHC signal is often not quantified beyond a categorical variable such as −/+/++, making IHC a less than optimal method for LAG-3 quantification and comparison with PET uptake. In addition, a tumor biopsy only contains a small fraction (~ 0.1%) of the tumor tissue. Thirdly, upon binding of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 to LAG-3, the mAb-LAG-3 complex internalizes and becomes degraded. However, 89Zr is a residualizing isotope that accumulates in the cell over time, representing a compounded signal rather than the target expression at a fixed point in time. This is especially of interest for targets like LAG-3, since new LAG-3 receptors can be synthesized at a rate of ~ 10% per hour in T cells [21], and thus, this process can result in a considerably enhanced PET tracer signal even when the target protein expression is low.
For a potential predictive imaging biomarker to be successful, the PET signal not only needs to be quantifiable, but also needs to be target specific. To this end, unlabeled BI 754111 mAb was administered prior to [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 injection—thereby increasing the mass dose of the tracer. For the spleen, this resulted in partial saturation of the spleen-to-plasma ratio at the 44-mg dose, and complete saturation at the 604-mg dose, demonstrating that this signal is indeed target specific. These results were confirmed by Patlak analyses—a method to isolate irreversible uptake from reversible uptake [32]—which also demonstrated that for the spleen the irreversible uptake was completely saturated at the 604-mg dose. For tumor lesions, increasing the mass dose also resulted in a decrease in tumor-to-plasma ratios, which demonstrates target specificity, and is consistent with LAG-3 saturation at these doses. Since BI 754111 (combined with ezabenlimab) is a three-weekly treatment and the latest time-point in this study is 138 h p.i. (~ 6 days), saturation during the full 3 weeks cannot be assessed. However, employing 89Zr-immuno-PET data in such a way can potentially help inform decisions on an RP2D in the future, especially for mAb therapies where due to the lack of acute toxicities an RP2D dose is hard to establish. As a side note, PET imaging with anti-LAG-3 can be employed as a pharmacodynamic biomarker to detect upregulation of LAG-3 in response to different immunotherapeutic strategies, revealing potential mechanisms of resistance or uncovering new potential applications of anti-LAG-3 therapy.
A requirement that is becoming increasingly more relevant for potentially predictive imaging biomarkers, is the degree of corroboration by tissue-based analyses. RNA-sequencing of pre-treatment biopsies identified two patients (6 and 9) with a low number of immune cells in the tumor (i.e., immune desert tumors) at baseline, which corresponded to low tumor uptake of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 at the 4-mg dose. Higher tumor uptake of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 observed in patients 1, 2, and 10 coincided with a higher CD4 and CD8 T-cell content and an activated T-cell signature at baseline, including relatively high expression levels of LAG-3 and other immune checkpoints, as well as evidence of increased Tregs and B-cells. The concomitant presence of a TLS signature fits with the (marginally) improved clinical outcome in these patients. Although the sample size should be expanded for definitive conclusions, these data support the PET imaging results and are a first attempt at using RNA-sequencing to substantiate PET tracer uptake findings.
In parallel, four other anti-LAG-3 radiotracers are currently under development: three anti-LAG-3 nanobody-based tracers, two of which have shown promising results in pre-clinical studies [48,49,50], and a third which is currently recruiting up to 50 patients with solid tumors (NCT05346276). The fourth is another 89Zr-labelled anti-LAG-3 mAb ([89Zr]Zr-DFO-REGN3767) that is under investigation in two different clinical trials focusing on the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of this tracer (NCT04706715, NCT04566978). The results of these studies are eagerly awaited, specifically in the case of the nanobodies, as they have faster kinetics than [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111, which will make for an interesting comparison to the current study. The next step for a potential predictive imaging biomarker is a larger study that could test the correlation between PET tumor uptake and response to treatment. However, expanding the sample size in these types of studies is often limited by factors such as radiation burden and scan duration. These hurdles might be overcome by the use of the upcoming new generation of long-axial field-of-view PET scanners with ultra-high sensitivity (i.e., “total-body PET”), which substantially reduce scan time and radiation burden for patients, next to a strongly improved image quality [51].
Conclusions
In this study, we show that LAG-3 is a feasible target for generating a predictive imaging biomarker, with [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 demonstrating a favorable tumor-to-background uptake, target specificity, and correlation with the immune status of the tumor biopsies at baseline. These favorable technical and biological characteristics support further investigation of [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111 and other LAG-3-directed PET tracers for the development of predictive imaging biomarkers for anti-LAG-3 therapy.
Data availability
Data to support the findings in this study are included in the manuscript or its supplementary information. Additional data can be made available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author (c.menke@amsterdamumc.nl).
References
Andrews LP, Marciscano AE, Drake CG, Vignali DA. LAG3 (CD223) as a cancer immunotherapy target. Immunol. Rev. 2017;276:80–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12519.
Triebel F, Jitsukawa S, Baixeras E, Roman-Roman S, Genevee C, Viegas-Pequignot E, et al. LAG-3, a novel lymphocyte activation gene closely related to CD4. J. Exp. Med. 1990;171:1393–405. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.171.5.1393.
Workman CJ, Wang Y, El Kasmi KC, Pardoll DM, Murray PJ, Drake CG, et al. LAG-3 regulates plasmacytoid dendritic cell homeostasis. J. Immunol. 2009;182:1885–91. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0800185.
Lecocq Q, Keyaerts M, Devoogdt N, Breckpot K. The next-generation immune checkpoint LAG-3 and its therapeutic potential in oncology: third time’s a charm. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;22:75. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010075.
Maruhashi T, Sugiura D, Okazaki IM, Okazaki T. LAG-3: from molecular functions to clinical applications. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2020;8:e001014. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001014.
Deng W-W, Mao L, Yu G-T, Bu L-L, Ma S-R, Liu B, et al. LAG-3 confers poor prognosis and its blockade reshapes antitumor response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1239005. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2016.1239005.
He Y, Yu H, Rozeboom L, Rivard CJ, Ellison K, Dziadziuszko R, et al. LAG-3 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer and its relationship with PD-1/PD-L1 and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2017;12:814–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2017.01.019.
Koyama S, Akbay EA, Li YY, Herter-Sprie GS, Buczkowski KA, Richards WG, et al. Adaptive resistance to therapeutic PD-1 blockade is associated with upregulation of alternative immune checkpoints. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:10501. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10501.
Lythgoe MP, Liu DSK, Annels NE, Krell J, Frampton AE. Gene of the month: lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3). J. Clin. Pathol. 2021;74:543–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207517.
Gestermann N, Saugy D, Martignier C, Tille L, Fuertes Marraco SA, Zettl M, et al. LAG-3 and PD-1+LAG-3 inhibition promote anti-tumor immune responses in human autologous melanoma/T cell co-cultures. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9:1736792. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2020.1736792.
Lichtenegger FS, Rothe M, Schnorfeil FM, Deiser K, Krupka C, Augsberger C, et al. Targeting LAG-3 and PD-1 to enhance t cell activation by antigen-presenting cells. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00385.
Zhai W, Zhou X, Wang H, Li W, Chen G, Sui X, et al. A novel cyclic peptide targeting LAG-3 for cancer immunotherapy by activating antigen-specific CD8(+) T cell responses. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020;10:1047–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2020.01.005.
Goding SR, Wilson KA, Xie Y, Harris KM, Baxi A, Akpinarli A, et al. Restoring immune function of tumor-specific CD4+ T cells during recurrence of melanoma. J. Immunol. 2013;190:4899–909. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1300271.
Tawbi HA, Schadendorf D, Lipson EJ, Ascierto PA, Matamala L, Castillo Gutierrez E, et al. Relatlimab and nivolumab versus nivolumab in untreated advanced melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022;386:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2109970.
van Dongen G, Beaino W, Windhorst AD, Zwezerijnen GJC, Oprea-Lager DE, Hendrikse NH, et al. The role of (89)Zr-Immuno-PET in navigating and derisking the development of biopharmaceuticals. J. Nucl. Med. 2021;62:438–45. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.239558.
Niemeijer AN, Leung D, Huisman MC, Bahce I, Hoekstra OS, van Dongen G, et al. Whole body PD-1 and PD-L1 positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:4664. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07131-y.
Niemeijer AN, Oprea-Lager DE, Huisman MC, Hoekstra OS, Boellaard R, de Wit-van der Veen BJ, et al. Study of (89)Zr-Pembrolizumab PET/CT in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2022;63:362–7. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.261926.
Bensch F, van der Veen EL, Lub-de Hooge MN, Jorritsma-Smit A, Boellaard R, Kok IC, et al. (89)Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1852–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0255-8.
Zhang Q, Salzler R, Dore A, Yang J, Ma D, Olson WC, et al. Multiplex immuno-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-parallel reaction monitoring (LC-MS-PRM) quantitation of CD8A, CD4, LAG3, PD1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 in frozen human tissues. J. Proteome Res. 2018;17:3932–40. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00605.
Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347:1260419. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260419.
Woo SR, Li N, Bruno TC, Forbes K, Brown S, Workman C, et al. Differential subcellular localization of the regulatory T-cell protein LAG-3 and the coreceptor CD4. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010;40:1768–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.200939874.
Bae J, Lee SJ, Park CG, Lee YS, Chun T. Trafficking of LAG-3 to the surface on activated T cells via its cytoplasmic domain and protein kinase C signaling. J. Immunol. 2014;193:3101–12. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1401025.
der Houven M-v, van Oordt CW, McGeoch A, Bergstrom M, McSherry I, Smith DA, Cleveland M, et al. Immuno-PET imaging to assess target engagement: experience from (89)Zr-Anti-HER3 mAb (GSK2849330) in patients with solid tumors. J. Nucl. Med. 2019;60:902–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.214726.
Viala M, Vinches M, Alexandre M, Mollevi C, Durigova A, Hayaoui N, et al. Strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection. Br. J. Cancer. 2018;118:679–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.473.
Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2015;42:328–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x.
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur. J. Cancer. 2009;45:228–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A, Ford R, Schwartz LH, Mandrekar S, et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:e143–e52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30074-8.
World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
European Medicines Agency. ICH guideline M3(R2) on non-clinical safety studies for the conduct of human clinical trials and marketing authorisation for pharmaceuticals. 2009. Available online at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500002720.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2023.
Greuter HN, van Ophemert PL, Luurtsema G, Franssen EJ, Boellaard R, Lammertsma AA. Validation of a multiwell gamma-counter for measuring high-pressure liquid chromatography metabolite profiles. J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2004;32:28–32.
Lammertsma AA, Hoekstra CJ, Giaccone G, Hoekstra OS. How should we analyse FDG PET studies for monitoring tumour response? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2006;33(Suppl1):16–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0131-5.
Jauw YWS, O’Donoghue JA, Zijlstra JM, Hoekstra OS, der Houven M-v, van Oordt CW, Morschhauser F, et al. (89)Zr-Immuno-PET: toward a noninvasive clinical tool to measure target engagement of therapeutic antibodies in vivo. J. Nucl. Med. 2019;60:1825–32. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.224568.
Vosjan MJ, Perk LR, Visser GW, Budde M, Jurek P, Kiefer GE, et al. Conjugation and radiolabeling of monoclonal antibodies with zirconium-89 for PET imaging using the bifunctional chelate p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine. Nat. Protoc. 2010;5:739–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.13.
Boellaard R. Quantitative oncology molecular analysis suite: ACCURATE [abstract]. J. Nucl. Med. 2018;59(suppl.1):1753.
Jauw YWS, Bensch F, Brouwers AH, Hoekstra OS, Zijlstra JM, Pieplenbosch S, et al. Interobserver reproducibility of tumor uptake quantification with (89)Zr-immuno-PET: a multicenter analysis. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2019;46:1840–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04377-6.
Makris NE, Boellaard R, Visser EP, de Jong JR, Vanderlinden B, Wierts R, et al. Multicenter harmonization of 89Zr PET/CT performance. J. Nucl. Med. 2014;55:264–7. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.113.130112.
Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2010. Available online at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. Accessed 23 Feb 2023.
Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635.
Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-323.
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8.
Sturm G, Finotello F, List M. Immunedeconv: an R package for unified access to computational methods for estimating immune cell fractions from bulk RNA-sequencing data. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020;2120:223–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0327-7_16.
Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. 2016. Available online at: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org. Accessed 23 Feb 2023.
Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdottir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov JP, Tamayo P. The molecular signatures database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 2015;1:417–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004.
Cabrita R, Lauss M, Sanna A, Donia M, Skaarup Larsen M, Mitra S, et al. Tertiary lymphoid structures improve immunotherapy and survival in melanoma. Nature. 2020;577:561–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1914-8.
Hanzelmann S, Castelo R, Guinney J. GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-7.
Li Q, Liu X, Wang D, Wang Y, Lu H, Wen S, et al. Prognostic value of tertiary lymphoid structure and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2020;12:24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-020-00092-3.
Silina K, Soltermann A, Attar FM, Casanova R, Uckeley ZM, Thut H, et al. Germinal centers determine the prognostic relevance of tertiary lymphoid structures and are impaired by corticosteroids in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2018;78:1308–20. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1987.
Lecocq Q, Awad RM, De Vlaeminck Y, de Mey W, Ertveldt T, Goyvaerts C, et al. Single-domain antibody nuclear imaging allows noninvasive quantification of LAG-3 expression by tumor-infiltrating leukocytes and predicts response of immune checkpoint blockade. J. Nucl. Med. 2021;62:1638–44. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.258871.
Lecocq Q, Zeven K, De Vlaeminck Y, Martens S, Massa S, Goyvaerts C, et al. Noninvasive imaging of the immune checkpoint LAG-3 using nanobodies, from development to pre-clinical use. Biomolecules. 2019;9:548. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9100548.
Chen B, Tang Y, Rao W, Zhu Z, Xiang S, Xiao L, et al. A novel PET imaging probe of LAG-3 expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes: in preclinical use. J. Nucl. Med. 2022;63:2455.
Katal S, Eibschutz LS, Saboury B, Gholamrezanezhad A, Alavi A. Advantages and applications of total-body PET scanning. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12:246. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020426.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the significant contributions of Theresia Leo-Kress, Carina Kienle, and Annick Lahogue to this study.
Funding
This work was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
IB, CWM, and IHCM: included patients and conducted the clinical trial. MCH, GJCZ, RG, APP, IHCM: processed and analyzed PET data. DJV and GAMSD were responsible for tracer production. RH and AP executed and processed RNA-sequencing data. AT provided continuous scientific input. All authors provided input on the content of this paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
RG, APP, AT, RH, ME, AP are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim (BI). CWM and IB have received research funding from BI. BI funded this study and was involved in the conceptualization, design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Oncology - General.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Miedema, I.H., Huisman, M.C., Zwezerijnen, G.J. et al. 89Zr-immuno-PET using the anti-LAG-3 tracer [89Zr]Zr-BI 754111: demonstrating target specific binding in NSCLC and HNSCC. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 50, 2068–2080 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06164-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06164-w