Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer among men [1, 2]. Although patients with localized prostate cancer receive treatment with curative intent, a significant proportion of patients will nonetheless progress to advanced metastatic disease [1, 3]. The interest in Lutetium-177 labeled, prostate specific membrane antigen (177Lu-PSMA) targeted radioligand therapy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer is growing: it generally appears well-tolerated and has a potential low toxicity as well as a beneficial efficacy profile [4,5,6,7,8]. Nevertheless, empirical evidence of clinical effectiveness is still limited to a number of retrospective studies and at best a phase II trial [7, 9]. Ongoing trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov include three phase I and five phase II studies. In May 2018, the first phase III study, so-called VISION (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03511664), started, investigating 177Lu-PSMA treatment safety and effectiveness against the current standard treatments for patients with progressive PSMA-positive, castration-resistant, post-chemotherapy metastatic prostate cancer [3, 6, 10]. The primary endpoint is survival and the first data of this study are expected in 2021 [3].
When trials prove positive, the demand for 177Lu-PSMA therapy is might dramatically increase at short notice. Global supply must anticipate; however, a precise forecast of the expected therapeutic isotope production capacity for the next 10 years is not yet available. To date, most of 177Lu is produced in Europe, in six nuclear reactors, one of which is located in Petten, the Netherlands [11, 12]. Two of these facilities (aged over 45 years) require renovation or new construction investments in the coming 15 years [11]. The Dutch demand for 177Lu is expected to increase with 7% per year, which will lead to shortages within 5 years [11]. In the Netherlands alone, with an estimated number of 4500 eligible patients per year and an anticipated 4–6 177Lu-PSMA treatment cycles per patient, this means that a number of 18,000–27,000 177Lu-PSMA treatments need to be accommodated per year. This would be a volume increase without parallel in the history of nuclear medicine, and it is at best questionable whether existing production facilities can produce the 177Lu necessary.
However, the hitherto inconceivable patient volume is just one of a multitude of issues that need to be dealt with. Other obstacles are the lack of empirical evidence of clinical effectiveness, the limited hospital capacity (e.g., appropriate facilities, resources, and staffing), and appropriate regulations that limit the introduction of radioligand therapy in today’s healthcare systems [13]. 177Lu-PSMA is a radiopharmaceutical agent with a mechanism of action that is far more a form of radiation therapy than a conventional pharmaceutical treatment. Nonetheless, it is strongly regulated like a conventional pharmaceutical, while it differs markedly from conventional oncological therapies. This in turn has a number of strong implications for its clinical introduction. Thus far, no directives have yet been developed for 177Lu-PSMA’s introduction into routine care. Along the lines of implementation challenges, we here propose an agenda to promote optimal introduction and implementation of 177Lu-PSMA.
The implementation of 177Lu-PSMA into routine care, like other new treatments, typically is multifaceted [14]. It includes provider behavior and preference, care organization, and environmental, ethical, and policy considerations [15,16,17]. The Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework of new medical technologies and services points to the fundamental elements/aspects of implementation processes of complex technologies in healthcare in seven domains: (1) the clinical condition, (2) technology, (3) value proposition, (4) the adopter system (patient, lay caregivers, technology user, and other staff), (5) the organization, (6) the wider institutional and social context, and (7) the embedding and adaptation of these domains over time [15]. Figure 1 visualizes these domains with their components. Conceptualizing and identifying potential challenges as well as requirements of 177Lu-PSMA will advance the understanding of its implementation processes [15, 16].
Current literature on 177Lu-PSMA mainly focuses on its expected clinical efficacy and safety (the first and second NASSS domains) [4, 6, 8, 18]. Based on the NASSS framework, we propose four implementation domains: (1) value proposition, (2) organizational readiness, (3) operational readiness, and (4) environmental management.
-
1.
Value proposition
The ultimate value proposition of 177Lu-PSMA in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer has not yet been determined. Randomized controlled trials are running to generate evidence of 177Lu-PSMA’s clinical effectiveness and safety compared to present-day treatments, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and androgen blockade. The innovation also lacks evidence in different settings, such as different patient populations, cotreatment, dosage cycles, and dosage intensities [18]. Hence, the optimal valuing methods of 177Lu-PSMA’s expected benefits still have to be determined for short- and long-term cost-effectiveness analyses. These evaluations are becoming imperative in setting reimbursement in most countries [19] and are vital to ensure quality, efficiency, and access to specific healthcare interventions. Decision analytic modelling can quantify the (clinical) benefit and costs upfront and therefore raises information to effectively guide research budget and treatment development [20,21,22]. This approach can also predict the potential impact of 177Lu-PSMA on the present-day treatments and the allocation of scarce resources in healthcare systems.
-
2.
Operational readiness
The introduction of new technical developments in cancer treatment possibly disrupts standard treatment strategies and therefore calls for organizational renewal [14, 23]. The operational requirements and technical complexities of 177Lu-PSMA also have implications for the overall organization of hospital care. The true cost of implementing 177Lu-PSMA depends upon the final costs of the overall therapy (an important part of which, as with most novel oncology drugs, will be determined by the price setting by the manufacturer) as well as the location of therapy delivery. Potential users should assess the extent to which it can be successfully used or carried out within the nuclear medicine department as well as the hospital at large [16]. To illustrate, the delivery of 177Lu-PSMA is resource intensive: it requires a radiolabeled intravenous preparation and careful handling and specialist staff together with quality control and post-administration observation [4]. Although in some countries, outpatient administration of radionuclide therapy is allowed, most countries, certainly within Europe, legally prescribe hospitalization for administration [24]. Such hospitalization requires dedicated radiation protection facilities, in which patient rooms are required to have dedicated sanitary facilities and shielded walls [13]. Radiological drainage saturates in large storage tanks that are often located in the basement of the hospital before being discharged into the wastewater system. After treatment, each space is assessed for remaining radioactivity and decontaminated if needed. Therefore, especially new and/or expanding users will be faced with substantial investments and the adjustment of current management protocols and procedures [25].
-
3.
Organizational readiness
Introducing 177Lu-PSMA into practice on a large scale calls for considerable expansion of teaching of radiation-related subjects in the medical curriculum and the appropriate staffing policy for providing this treatment. Users have to manage all aspects of both PET/CT and 177Lu-PSMA, including specific clinical knowledge and in- and outpatient consultation by nuclear medicine staff (e.g., nuclear medicine physicians, technologists, nurses) [2]. This also requires appropriate team interactions and professional training [2, 25]. Ultimately, the need for highly trained staff calls for a review of the current medical training for nuclear medicine physicians, as this is oftentimes embedded in the general medical training for radiologists. The clinical role of many nuclear medicine physicians will change from a purely diagnostic role to a mixed diagnostic and therapeutic role. This will likely have an effect on staff attendance at tumor board meetings and collaboration within the team of clinical specialists.
Furthermore, patient follow-up after 177Lu-PSMA treatment varies between hospitals. Some nuclear medicine physicians check on patients themselves; in other hospitals, follow-up is managed by medical oncologists or others. The number of patients for whom follow-up is needed will markedly increase, especially for nuclear medicine physicians who carry out this task.
-
4.
Environmental management
It is critical that hospitals consciously pay attention to the ecological responsibility and safety of 177Lu-PSMA [24]. The processing of hazardous medical disposal and the emission of metabolized substance activity, including appropriate storage space, requires radiation protection regarding public and environmental exposure [26]. This responsibility demands resource and waste management guidelines both at individual and housekeeping levels for each operational phase of the hospital. At national level, each country will have to set specific radiation protection standards given that each radioactive substance requires specific management processes [13]. Compliance will be undoubtedly demanding.
Based on the four domains discussed, we propose the following research directions to facilitate 177Lu-PSMA’s implementation into routine care:
-
1.
Empirical evidence of the clinical effectiveness and safety of 177Lu-PSMA for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer and the identification of patient categories that benefit most;
-
2.
The ideal positioning and provision method of 177Lu-PSMA in the management pathway of advanced prostate cancer to optimize clinical and patient outcomes;
-
3.
How potential benefits and setbacks of 177Lu-PSMA implementation could differ from different medical products, in specific contexts, across indication groups and other demographic factors;
-
4.
Optimal methods for valuing the potential benefits of 177Lu-PSMA to support its short- and long-term cost-effectiveness analyses;
-
5.
How 177Lu-PSMA will affect the current pathways of prostate cancer care;
-
6.
Treatment perceptions and level of acceptance by patients, nuclear medicine physicians, and referral physicians;
-
7.
The optimal hospital operational and organizational structure and process to sustainably practice 177Lu-PSMA;
-
8.
Policies and practices to sustainably manage 177Lu-PSMA and help to omit unintended adverse consequences that could arise from it;
-
9.
The societal impact (e.g., academic infrastructure, economic, environmental aspects) of 177Lu-PSMA at both national and international levels.
These directions may guide and stimulate further research into the implementation of 177Lu-PSMA. The substantial investments and complexities may lead to 177Lu-PSMA being offered in a limited number of hospitals. 77Lu-PSMA therefore also reflects the general trend of specialized prostate cancer care [2, 27]. Implementation challenges are locally, nationally, and globally oriented and therefore require interactions between policymakers, healthcare providers, technology developers, and civil society organizations [14, 28]. Thus introducing 177Lu-PSMA into routine care sustainably requires multifaceted efforts from a holistic systemic perspective. Timely addressing implications in specific settings will likely avoid setbacks and may pave the way for a bright future of nuclear medicine therapy.
References
Bashir MN. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:5137–41.
Brausi M, et al. ECCO essential requirements for quality cancer care: prostate cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020;148:102861.
Ladurner M, Horninger W, Bektic J. Lutetium-PSMA therapy—a new therapeutic option in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer? Memo - Mag Eur Med Oncol. 2018;11:301–4.
Emmett L, et al. Lutetium 177 PSMA radionuclide therapy for men with prostate cancer: a review of the current literature and discussion of practical aspects of therapy. J Med Radiat Sci. 2017;64:52–60.
von Eyben FE, et al. Third-line treatment and 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:496–508.
Calopedos RJS, Chalasani V, Asher R, Emmett L, Woo HH. Lutetium-177-labelled anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen antibody and ligands for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017;20:352–60.
Hofman MS, et al. [177 Lu]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:825–33.
Yadav MP, Ballal S, Sahoo RK, Dwivedi SN, Chandrasekhar B. Radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stat F Theor. 2019;53:1689–99.
Vis AN, Jansen BHE, Bodar YJL, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Hendrikse HN, Oprea-Lager DE. 177Lutetium PSMA radioligand therapy in prostate cancer. Tijdschr voor Urol. 2020;10:60–5.
Leibowitz R, Davidson T, Gadot M, Aharon M, Malki A, Levartovsky M, et al. A retrospective analysis of the safety and activity of Lutetium-177-PSMA radionuclide treatment in older patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer. Oncologist. 2020;1–6.
Roobol LP, de Waard IR. Marktontwikkeling en leveringszekerheid voor medische radionucliden. 2019;68. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl.
Boudewijns LHA, Waard D. I R. Recente ontwikkelingen in medische stralingstoepassingen. 2019.
Merkel C, et al. Realising the potential of radioligand therapy: policy solutions for the barriers to implementation across Europe. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:1335–9.
Urquhart R, Porter GA, Sargeant J, Jackson L, Grunfeld E. Multi-level factors influence the implementation and use of complex innovations in cancer care: a multiple case study of synoptic reporting. Implement Sci. 2014;9:1–16.
Greenhalgh T, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e367.
Proctor E, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Heal Ment Heal Serv Res. 2011;38:65–76.
Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CHI. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: A systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013;8.
Sun M, Niaz MO, Nelson A, Skafida M, Niaz MJ. Review of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cureus. 2020;12:10–7.
Hartz S, John J. The contribution of economic evaluation to decision-making in early phases of product development: a methodological and empirical review. SSRN Electron J. 2011. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1053681.
Ijzerman MJ, Steuten LMG. Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access: a review of methods and applications. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9:331–47.
Grutters JPC, et al. Problems and promises of health technologies: the role of early health economic modeling. Int J Heal Policy Manag. 2019;8:575–82.
Drummond M, et al. Response from the authors of ‘Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions’. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:367–8.
Fennell ML, Das IP, Clauser S, Petrelli N, Salner A. The organization of multidisciplinary care teams: Modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality. J Natl Cancer Inst - Monogr. 2010;72–80.
Kurth J, Krause BJ, Schwarzenböck SM, Stegger L, Schäfers M, Rahbar K. External radiation exposure, excretion, and effective half-life in 177Lu-PSMA-targeted therapies. EJNMMI Res. EJNMMI Research; 2018;8.
Bertram RM, Suter JC, Bruns EJ, O’Rourke KE. Implementation research and wraparound literature: building a research agenda. J Child Fam Stud. 2011;20:713–25.
Hasan SE. Public awareness is key to successful waste management. J Environ Sci Heal - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Subst Environ Eng. 2004;39:483–92.
Dutch Institute National Health Care (Zorginstituut Nederland). ZorgCijfers Monitor Regeling ziekenvervoer: gebruik en kosten. 2019; Available from: https://www.zorginstituutnederland.nl/publicaties/rapport/2019/03/12/zorgcijfers-monitor---regeling-ziekenvervoer-gebruik-en-kosten.
Mendel P, Meredith LS, Schoenbaum M, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. Interventions in organizational and community context: a framework for building evidence on dissemination and implementation in health services research. Adm Policy Ment Heal Ment Heal Serv Res. 2008;35:21–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was not required because the paper is an Editorial.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Oncology – General
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hehakaya, C., Moors, E.H.M., Verkooijen, H.M. et al. 177Lu-PSMA for advanced prostate cancer: are we ready to play big?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48, 2325–2328 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05102-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05102-4