Abstract
Objective
When deciding on therapy, FDG PET/CT-positive results should be confirmed by histology if possible. We evaluated the impact of percutaneous PET/CT-guided biopsies on histological confirmation of PET/CT-positive lesions.
Methods
We prospectively evaluated 126 patients who had undergone a PET/CT scan with positive results with an indication for histological evaluation of lesions. Imaging was performed in a PET/CT scanner with a fluoroscopic imaging system. A total of 130 lesions were accessed by PET/CT-guided biopsy. The technical feasibility, clinical success and complication rates of PET/CT-guided biopsies were evaluated.
Results
Of 130 PET/CT-positive lesions, 128 (98.5 %) were successfully accessed and representative tissue samples obtained. Two lesions were reaccessed due to inconclusive histological results. Histology showed that 99 of the 130 lesions (76.2 %) were malignant, and 31 lesions (23.8 %) were benign (inflammatory cells or necrotic tissue); these patients had no recurrence of disease after a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Also, in 23 of the 130 lesions (17.7 %), the patient was referred for the PET/CT-guided biopsy due to a previous nontumoral biopsy result, and of these 23 lesions, 21 were found to be malignant. The complication rates were: pneumothorax in 15/130 (11.5 %; resolved spontaneously), haemoptysis in 2/130 (1.5 %) and severe haemothorax in 1/130 (0.8 %); there was no procedure-related mortality.
Conclusion
PET/CT-guided biopsy is feasible and may optimize the diagnostic yield of image-guided interventions. Also, PET/CT-positive lesions with no morphological correlation may now be accessible to percutaneous interventions.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
During the last decade, positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG PET/CT) has been introduced as one of the main procedures in the evaluation and management of oncological patients, including initial staging, early response evaluation, posttreatment assessment of and follow-up. In fact, for some types of cancer FDG PET assessment has become essential [1, 2]. Meta-analyses [3–5] have shown that FDG PET/CT has higher accuracy than imaging methods for assessing anatomy (CT and MRI) in the differentiation of tumour and fibrosis in residual masses after therapy [6–10]. In spite of the high negative predictive value of FDG PET, false-positive results might occur. Bearing in mind that a positive FDG PET scan can guide management, determining treatment, whether surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy, with the risk of morbidity and mortality, in many cases it is recommended that the results be confirmed histopathologically.
This study aims of this study were to assess the feasibility, results and impact of FDG PET/CT-guided biopsies, including technical and clinical success rates.
Methods
A total of 126 patients were referred to the PET/CT division of a diagnosis centre (Quanta Diagnosis and Therapy) for biopsy of a suspicious lesion. After evaluation of the PET/CT scan, the results were discussed with the referring physician who made the final decision as to whether biopsy was indicated.
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients eligible for this prospective study between August 2010 and February 2012. Complete blood counts, including platelet and coagulation studies, were requested before performing the biopsy. Exclusion criteria were: platelet count less than 100,000/µl, altered coagulation parameters and clinical contraindication for the procedure.
FDG PET/CT imaging
Whole-body FDG PET/CT imaging was performed following an uptake period of 60–90 min after intravenous administration of 296–444 MBq (8–12 mCi) of FDG. Imaging was performed in a PET/CT STE-16 scanner (GE STE 16-slice CT scanner; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) with a CT fluoroscopic imaging system.
Two experienced board-certified nuclear medicine physicians interpreted the FDG PET scans. Areas of nonphysiological abnormalities with increased FDG uptake over the background were classified as positive for disease.
Biopsy procedure
An 18G semiautomated core biopsy needle with a coaxial guide needle were used to perform the biopsies.
-
1.
Initially patients were submitted to the FDG PET/CT scan before the biopsy. The results were used to define the biopsy site and needle path, taking into account the relationship between the anatomical structures and the suspicious lesion.
-
2.
Patients were positioned and immobilized in the proper position, depending on the location of the lesion and biopsy approach.
-
3.
After conventional aseptic and antiseptic sterilization, draping towels were placed and anaesthesia with lidocaine 1.0 % without epinephrine was administered. Intravenous administration of diazepam during the biopsy procedure was not required, but in tense patients the medication could be used for light sedation.
-
4.
A suitable coaxial needle was inserted at the previously located puncture site. The angle and direction of the needle were adjusted according to the position of the suspicious lesion under the guidance of CT fluoroscopic imaging. The point of the coaxial needle was positioned in the border of the suspected lesion, and default PET/CT images were acquired to confirm its correct position.
-
5.
The core of coaxial needle was pulled out and an 18G semiautomatic biopsy needle inserted. Satisfactory puncture was confirmed on the CT scan and the biopsy site was recorded (if the lesion was small or difficult to differentiate from important structures such as peripheral vessels, enhanced CT could be used to optimize the imaging), and then specimen of 1 or 2 cm were obtained.
-
6.
Three or four specimens were collected.
-
7.
After removal of the needle, manual compression was performed for 2 to 3 min at the puncture site.
-
8.
The specimens were fixed in 10 % formalin and sent for histopathological examination.
-
9.
Patients were observed for at least 3 h after the procedure to ensure haemodynamic stability and their the respiratory condition monitored. CT was performed immediately and 3 h after the biopsy in patients in whom the needle were transfixin pleura, liver or stomach wall was necessary and expected as part of procedure.
Statistical analysis
The technical success rate (acquisition of the specimen for histological evaluation was achieved), the histological results (malignant vs. benign) and the complication rates (including pneumothorax, haematoma, haemoptysis and mortality) were evaluated.
The results of the PET/CT scans were considered crucial when: (1) a lesion with only increased metabolism was identified by PET, with no corresponding anatomical lesion on CT; (2) a heterogeneous mass with a component of fibrosis/necrosis associated with areas of FDG uptake considered possible viable tumour was identified; and (3) an increased number of lymph nodes in a chain, only some of which showed increased metabolism was identified.
Results
A total of 130 lesions were biopsied in 126 patients. Technical success was achieved in the biopsy procedure with removal of a metabolically active fragment in 128 lesions (98.5 %); two lesions were reaccessed due to inconclusive histological results. The patients' clinical information is presented in Table 1.
In 23 of the 130 lesions (17.7 %), the metabolic information provided by FDG PET was considered crucial in defining the location for the biopsy: 11 patients showed increased metabolism only by PET with no corresponding anatomical lesion on CT (liver, soft tissue lesions; Fig. 1); 10 patients had a heterogeneous mass with a component of fibrosis associated with viable tumour was identified; and 2 patients underwent a restaging FDG PET/CT scan due to lymphoma with an increased number of lymph nodes, only some of which showed increased metabolism (Fig. 2).
Of the 130 lesions biopsied, histology showed that 99 (76.2 %) were malignant and 31 (23.8 %) were benign (inflammatory cells or necrotic tissue). Patients with benign histology had no recurrence of disease at a median follow-up of 14.2 months (SD 6.2 months). Also, in 23 of the 130 lesions (17.7 %), the patient was referred for the biopsy-guided PET/CT due to a previous nontumoral biopsy result, and of these 23 lesions, 21 were found to be malignant.
The complication rates were: pneumothorax in 15/130 (11.5 %; resolved spontaneously), haemoptysis in 2/130 (1.5 %), and severe haemothorax in 1/130 (0.8 %); there was no procedure-related mortality. Of the 126 patients, 125 (99.2 %) were discharged on the day of the procedure in good condition and with no significant complaints.
Discussion
The use of FDG PET/CT is widespread and increasing, mainly for oncological applications, and especially in lymphoma, non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer and colorectal cancers [11]. However, false-positive results have been found in about 10–26 % of all patients [12–14]. Therefore, histological documentation is generally the cornerstone in therapeutic decision making regarding the institution of a new therapy. This is especially true for single lesions and lesions with exclusively FDG uptake without corresponding anatomical findings on CT [15]. In this study, of the 130 lesions biopsied, histology showed that 76.2 % were malignant and 23.8 % were benign, with no recurrence of disease after a minimum follow-up of 6 months. This is extremely important in deciding on further treatment bearing in mind that therapy has important adverse effects, including an impact on survival [16].
Needle positioning guided by PET/CT, similar to the procedure described by Veit et al. [21] in an ex vivo liver model, proved to be feasible and no relevant complication occurred in a routine clinical setting, with an additional clinical impact in 50 % of the patients. Other colleagues have shown success in PET/CT-guided biopsy in small series of patients with similar results [22, 23]. In our study samples were successfully collected in 98.5 % of PET/CT-guided biopsy procedures, with a reasonable rate of complications (11.5 %), with only one major complication (severe haemothorax), and no procedure-related mortality. These complication rates are comparable to those associated with CT-guided core biopsies [24–26].
Image-guided biopsy is well established in the radiological community. Even though success rates for CT-guided biopsies of morphologically clearly circumscribed lesions are reported to range between 70 % and 90 % [17–20], in 23 of 130 lesions (17.7 %) evaluated in this study, the patient was referred for PET/CT-guided biopsy due to a previous conventional biopsy with a nontumoral result. In these patients, after PET/CT-guided biopsy 21 lesions were found to be malignant on histology.
It is important to note that in our consecutive series of cases, in 23 of 130 lesions (17.7 %), the metabolic information provided by PET was considered crucial in defining the location for biopsy of lesions that had increased metabolism identified only by PET (with no corresponding anatomical lesion on CT), of heterogeneous masses (with component of fibrosis associated with viable tumour) and of lymph nodes shown in increased numbers in a chain, only some of which showed increased metabolism. This confirms that PET/CT-guided biopsy might improve the histological verification when compared to alternative conventional techniques, probably reducing inconclusive biopsy or unreliable results, and the inherent strain for the patient may be avoided. In order to increase the success rate of image-guided biopsies and to decrease the number of second or even third image-guided biopsies, it is helpful to puncture the part of the lesion showing the highest metabolism.
A randomized trial comparing the accuracy of the FDG PET/CT-guided procedure to conventional image-guided procedures would be desirable in the light of these results.
Conclusion
PET/CT-guided biopsy is feasible and may optimize the diagnostic yield of image-guided interventions. Also, a lesion with FDG uptake and no corresponding anatomical lesion may now be accessible to percutaneous interventions.
References
Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS, Mottaghy FM, Dietlein M, Guermazi A, et al.; Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):571–8.
Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ, et al.; International harmonization project on lymphoma. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):579–86.
Isasi CR, Lu P, Blaufoux D. A metaanalysis of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the staging and restaging of patients with lymphoma. Cancer. 2005;104(5):1066–74.
Zijlstra JM, Lindauer-van der Werf G, Hoekstra OS, Hooft L, Riphagen II, Huijgens PC. 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for post-treatment evaluation of malignant lymphoma: a systematic review. Haematologica. 2006;91:522–9.
Facey K, Bradbury I, Laking G, Payne E. Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(44):iii–iv, iv–207.
Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Van Steenweghen S, Thomas J, Vandenberghe P, et al. Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods? J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(2):414–9.
Jerusalem G, Beguin Y, Fassotte MF, Najjar F, Paulus P, Rigo P, et al. Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging. Blood. 1999;94(2):429–33.
Kostakoglu L, Coleman M, Leonard JP, Kuji I, Zoe H, Goldsmith SJ. PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1018–27.
Mikhaeel NG, Timothy AR, O’Doherty MJ, Hain S, Maisey MN. 18-FDG-PET as a prognostic indicator in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: comparison with CT. Leuk Lymphoma. 2000;39:543–53.
Weihrauch MR, Re D, Scheidhauer K, Ansén S, Dietlein M, Bischoff S, et al. Thoracic positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for the evaluation of residual mediastinal Hodgkin disease. Blood. 2001;98(10):2930–4.
Podoloff DA, Ball DW, Ben-Josef E, Benson 3rd AB, Cohen SJ, Coleman RE, et al. NCCN task force: clinical utility of PET in a variety of tumor types. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7 Suppl 2:S1–26.
Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, Dahmen G, Mueller SP, Beyer T, et al. Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(21):4357–68.
Mahner S, Schirrmacher S, Brenner W, Jenicke L, Habermann CR, Avril N, et al. Comparison between positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, conventional imaging and computed tomography for staging of breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(7):1249–54.
Cerci JJ, Trindade E, Buccheri V, Fanti S, Coutinho AM, Zanoni L, et al. Consistency of FDG-PET accuracy and cost-effectiveness in initial staging of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma across jurisdictions. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2011;11(4):314–20.
Klaeser B, Wiskirchen J, Wartenberg J, Weitzel T, Schmid RA, Mueller MD, et al. PET/CT-guided biopsies of metabolically active bone lesions: applications and clinical impact. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(11):2027–36.
Ng AK, Bernardo MP, Weller E, Backstrand KH, Silver B, Marcus KC, et al. Long-term survival and competing causes of death in patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s disease treated at age 50 or younger. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2101–8.
Huch K, Röderer G, Ulmar B, Reichel H. CT-guided interventions in orthopedics. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(8):677–83.
Grand DJ, Atalay MA, Cronan JJ, Mayo-Smith WW, Dupuy DE. CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy: comparison of conventional CT fluoroscopy to CT fluoroscopy with electromagnetic navigation system in 60 consecutive patients. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79(2):e133–6.
Omura MC, Motamedi K, Uybico S, Nelson SD, Seeger LL. Revisiting CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions: contributors to biopsy success. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(2):457–61.
Wu CC, Maher MM, Shepard JA. Complications of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: prevention and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(6):W678–82.
Veit P, Kuehle C, Beyer T, et al. Accuracy of combined PET/CT in image-guided interventions of liver lesions: an ex-vivo-study. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:2388–93.
Tatli S, Gerbaudo VH, Feeley CM, Shyn PB, Tuncali K, Silverman SG. PET/CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses: initial experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22(4):507–14.
O’Sullivan PJ, Rohren EM, Madewell JE. Positron emission tomography-CT imaging in guiding musculoskeletal biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am. 2008;46(3):475–86, v.
Yamauchi Y, Izumi Y, Nakatsuka S, Inoue M, Hayashi Y, Mukai M, et al. Diagnostic performance of percutaneous core needle lung biopsy under multi-CT fluoroscopic guidance for ground-glass opacity pulmonary lesions. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79(2):e85–9.
Tomozawa Y, Inaba Y, Yamaura H, Sato Y, Kato M, Kanamoto T, et al. Clinical value of CT-guided needle biopsy for retroperitoneal lesions. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12(3):351–7.
Tsai IC, Tsai WL, Chen MC, Chang GC, Tzeng WS, Chan SW, et al. CT-guided core biopsy of lung lesions: a primer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(5):1228–35.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cerci, J.J., Pereira Neto, C.C., Krauzer, C. et al. The impact of coaxial core biopsy guided by FDG PET/CT in oncological patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40, 98–103 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2263-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2263-0