Abstract
Purpose
Planar lymphoscintigraphy is routinely used for preoperative sentinel node visualization, but large gamma cameras are not always available. We evaluated the reproducibility of lymphatic mapping with a smaller and portable gamma camera.
Methods
In two centres, 52 patients with breast cancer received preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with a conventional gamma camera with a field of view of 40 × 40 cm. Static anterior and lateral images were performed at 15 min, 2 h and 4 h after injection of the radiotracer (99mTc-nanocolloid). At 2 h after injection, anterior and oblique images were also performed with a portable gamma camera (Sentinella, Oncovision) positioned to obtain a field of view of 20 × 20 cm. Visualization of lymphatic drainage on conventional images and images with the portable device were compared for number of nodes depicted, their intensity and localization of sentinel nodes.
Results
The images performed with the conventional gamma camera depicted sentinel nodes in 94%, while the portable gamma camera showed drainage in 73%. There was however no significant difference in visualization between the two devices when a lead shield was used to mask the injection area in 43 patients (95 vs 88%, p = 0.25). Second-echelon nodes were visualized in 62% of the patients with the conventional gamma camera and in 29% of the cases with the portable gamma camera.
Conclusion
Preoperative imaging with a portable gamma camera fitted with a pinhole collimator to obtain a field of view of 20 × 20 cm is able to depict sentinel nodes in 88% of the cases, if a lead shield is used to mask the injection site. This device may be useful in centres without the possibility to perform a preoperative image.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sentinel node biopsy is routinely used for nodal staging of patients with breast cancer. After the injection of a radiopharmaceutical, planar lymphoscintigraphy is usually performed preoperatively to visualize lymphatic drainage from the breast. Sequential planar images will show successive stages of drainage and thereby help to determine the number and location of sentinel nodes [1–3]. Unfortunately, gamma cameras are not always used or available and therefore patients are sometimes operated without preoperative images [4, 5]. Surgeons then rely on the gamma probe only to guide excision of radioactive sentinel nodes, and in many cases patent blue is used as an additional guide [5–7]. In this way, extra-axillary sentinel nodes cannot be harvested and surgeons are not informed about the number of sentinel nodes to be expected.
A portable gamma camera has recently been introduced for intraoperative visualization of radiotracer activity and can help to localize the tumour and the sentinel nodes during operation [8, 9]. The intraoperative use of this portable device might lead to excision of additional sentinel nodes [10]. In theory, this camera can also be used to improve preoperative sentinel node visualization. Provided that image quality and field of view are sufficient, a portable gamma camera could be used when a conventional gamma camera is unavailable or occupied.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative lymphatic mapping in breast cancer is possible using a portable gamma camera positioned to obtain a field of view of 20 × 20 cm. Images from this portable device were compared to conventional gamma camera imaging.
Materials and methods
Retrospective proof of concept
Anterior and lateral planar images of ten breast cancer patients, who had previously undergone planar lymphoscintigraphy with the conventional gamma camera (SymbiaT, Siemens), were reviewed. The images were reduced to only show a 20 × 20 field of view. In the majority of patients, this area covers a region from supraclavicular to inframammary areas and from parasternal to arm areas. This zone is where the normal breast lymphatic drainage shows the sentinel lymph node localization. These 20 × 20 images were compared to the original 40 × 40 images to evaluate if all hot spots could be detected within the smaller field of view.
Prospective study
Fifty-two patients who were scheduled for sentinel lymph node biopsy were prospectively included. All patients had negative axillary nodes on clinical examination and ultrasonography. Patients who had previously undergone treatment of the breast or axilla were excluded. Thirty-five patients were treated at the Hospital Clinic Barcelona and 17 patients at the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam. All patients gave informed consent.
The radiotracer, 99mTc-nanocolloid (Nanocoll®; GE Healthcare), was injected intratumourally. The injected dose was 111–140 MBq in 0.2–0.5 ml. Routine imaging was performed, consisting of planar static images with the conventional gamma camera (E-Cam or SymbiaT, Siemens or Infinia Hawkeye, General Electric) at 15 min, 2 h and 4 h after injection. Static images consisted of an anterior (patient lying on the back or upright) and lateral (hanging breast or upright) image with an acquisition time of 5 min each. Directly after the conventional 2-h static images, images with the portable gamma camera (Sentinella, Oncovision) were made. We compared images with the two devices at 2 h because at this time point the yield of lymphatic mapping is higher than at 30 min. Furthermore, performing lymphoscintigraphy at 4 h was not routinely done in one of the facilities, due to logistic limitations.
The portable gamma camera is equipped with a 4-mm pinhole collimator and the field of view depends on the distance between the camera and the imaging plane. Based on the findings of the above-mentioned retrospective study we used a field of view of 20 × 20 cm. This was obtained by placing the detector at a distance of 18 cm above the breast (Fig. 1). Technical details of this portable gamma camera were previously described by Sánchez et al. [11]. In every patient anterior and lateral oblique images (patient lying on the back, breast fixated medially if necessary) were performed with an acquisition time of 3 min each. In 43 patients the injection site was shielded with lead in order to achieve a better depiction of the sentinel nodes. Nine patients were studied without lead shielding, because at one of the facilities lead shielding was not routinely used at the beginning of the study.
The location of the sentinel nodes was marked on the skin after the delayed conventional static images. Intraoperative sentinel node excision followed within 24 h after radiotracer injection and was assisted by the use of a gamma probe (Navigator®, Neoprobe® or Europrobe®; RMD Instruments Corp, Neoprobe Corp, Eurorad, respectively) and patent blue.
Analysis
Two-hour conventional planar images and portable camera images were collected in a database and scored by a team of three nuclear medicine physicians. Items that were scored for each image were: number of sentinel nodes and higher echelon nodes visualized, the location of the nodes (axillary or extra-axillary) and intensity of nodal uptake (visualization score 1–3, where 1 = weak intensity, 2 = moderate and 3 = intense). Visualization rates with the conventional camera and portable device were compared with McNemar’s test (SPSS for Windows). Mean numbers of sentinel nodes depicted were compared for both devices with the paired sample t test (SPSS for Windows). The main endpoint of the study was to assess the feasibility of lymphatic mapping in breast cancer with the portable gamma camera. Secondary endpoints were differences in the number of visualized nodes, location of visualized nodes and image quality between the conventional images and portable camera images.
Results
Retrospective proof of concept
In the 10 consecutive patients 16 sentinel nodes were visualized on 2-h planar images. All these nodes were confined within a 20 × 20 field of view.
Lymphoscintigraphic results
The images performed with the conventional gamma cameras showed adequate sentinel node visualization in 49 of 52 patients (94%). The preoperative images performed with the portable gamma camera demonstrated regional lymphatic drainage and sentinel node localization in 39 of 52 patients (75%). This difference in visualization is statistically significant (p = 0.001).
When a lead shield was used to mask the injection activity, a sentinel lymph node was observed with the conventional gamma camera in 41 of 43 patients (95%) and in 38 of 43 cases with the portable gamma camera (88%) (Fig. 2). This difference in visualization is not statistically significant (p = 0.25).
In the nine patients without shielding, the portable gamma camera was able to visualize a sentinel node in seven patients (78%). Visualized sentinel nodes were mostly located in the axilla, but in the parasternal region in two patients.
Number of sentinel nodes and area of drainage
Conventional images showed 74 sentinel nodes (1.4 per patient), while on the images with the portable gamma camera without lead shielding 47 sentinel nodes were depicted (0.9 per patient) (Fig. 3). Sixty-four per cent of sentinel nodes depicted by the conventional gamma camera were exactly reproduced with the portable gamma camera (Fig. 4). The mean number of nodes depicted on the portable gamma camera was 0.5 less (p < 0.001).
In 77.5% of the patients with visualization, sentinel nodes were located in the axilla only (38 of 49). In eight patients, sentinel nodes were visualized both in the axilla and in the parasternal region and three patients presented with a solitary sentinel node in the internal mammary chain.
Twelve axillary nodes as well as four internal mammary chain nodes were not depicted. In the remaining cases (11 hot spots), the portable gamma camera depicted 1 hot spot in the position where 2 separate ones were visualized on conventional images.
When a lead shield was placed over the injection site, conventional images showed 58 sentinel nodes (1.4 per patient), while on the images with the portable gamma camera 48 sentinel nodes were depicted (1.1 per patient). The mean number of nodes depicted on the portable gamma camera was 0.2 node per patient less than on conventional images (p = 0.01). In this scenario, five axillary lymph nodes depicted by the conventional gamma camera were not visualized with the portable gamma camera. In five patients, one sentinel node was visualized with the portable gamma camera, while two nodes were depicted on the conventional gamma camera images. In one patient, the portable gamma camera depicted two nodes, while one node was shown on the conventional image.
Second-echelon lymph nodes were visualized in 62% of all patients with the conventional gamma camera and in 29% with the portable gamma camera. When a lead shield was used, the latter percentage rose to 37%.
In the group with lead shielding, all internal mammary chain nodes depicted with the conventional gamma camera were reproduced by the portable gamma camera. In the group without shielding, four sentinel nodes in the internal mammary chain nodes were not visualized on portable gamma camera images.
Intensity of uptake
The intensity of uptake, as scored by a team of three nuclear medicine physicians, is outlined in Table 1. With conventional images, a mean intensity value of 2.2 per sentinel node was found. This value was 1.8 per sentinel node on the images with the portable gamma camera.
When shielding with lead was performed, the mean intensity value was 2.1 per sentinel node on conventional images compared to 2.3 on portable gamma camera images.
Discussion
Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is sometimes considered a time-consuming approach without a real impact on intraoperative sentinel node harvesting. Therefore, its utility in terms of cost-effectiveness is questioned in some countries. Dixon et al. reported a potentially more efficient and practical technique of immediate preoperative injection of blue dye and radiopharmaceutical by the surgeon. After injection of the radiopharmaceutical in the operation room sentinel node biopsy was performed and succeeded in 161 of 163 women [5]. This method does however not allow for late draining nodes to be detected, and, since no sequential images are available, second-echelon nodes will not be distinguished from the first draining node(s). In order to ensure optimal nodal harvesting, some countries have strict regulation with regards to injection and images, which must involve lymphoscintigraphy at the department of nuclear medicine [12, 13]. Furthermore, excision without images does imply that extra-axillary nodes will be missed.
The use of a portable gamma camera enables the nuclear medicine physician to perform lymphoscintigraphies in a separate room, without additional occupation of the conventional gamma camera. Several portable gamma cameras have been developed recently [14–17]. The portable gamma camera tested has a continuous scintillation crystal and a position-sensitive photomultiplier tube. The intrinsic spatial resolution is approximately 2 mm, and the energy resolution is 13% at 140 keV [11].
Normally, the field of view of conventional gamma cameras is 40 × 40 cm. In breast cancer we evaluated a set of different images coming from two tertiary hospitals and established that an area of 20 × 20 cm included all sentinel nodes depicted in those studies. Based on this experience, we adjusted the distance of a pinhole-based portable gamma camera to the body surface of the patient to get the same 20 × 20 cm area.
Our results indicate that such a portable gamma camera can detect sentinel nodes in 88% of the patients if adequate shielding is performed. Although statistical power is limited due to the small number of patients included, the visualization rate on conventional images is slightly better (not significant in our statistical analysis) and the intensity of the visualized nodes is comparable. The current number of depicted sentinel nodes per patient on portable gamma camera images is however less than the yield with conventional images at 2 h after injection. Per patient a mean of 0.2 sentinel nodes was visualized on conventional images, while missed on the images with the portable gamma camera. This means that in one of five patients, a sentinel node was missed on the portable gamma camera images compared to conventional images. Probably the most important explanation for this lower detection rate with the portable gamma camera is the distance (18 cm) used to position the camera in relation to the patient. This hypothesis also explains the low second-echelon nodes depicted with the portable gamma camera. In intraoperative conditions the portable gamma camera is positioned closer to the patient (5 cm), which increases the sensitivity. The replacement of the pinhole collimator by a flat diverging one might solve this problem.
In the current situation a field of view of 20 × 20 cm appears to be sufficient to visualize axillary as well as extra-axillary nodes. In the case of an obese patient two or three images might be performed in order to cover the whole axilla as well as intramammary, parasternal and periclavicular regions. In the future, new collimators might provide better resolution and sensitivity. Possibly, improvements could also be made to the imaging protocol. Lead shielding appears to be important in this respect, but acquisition time and distance to the body might also be varied in order to define optimal conditions. In the meantime, preoperative lymphatic mapping with a portable gamma camera and adequate shielding of the injection site may be useful in situations where no conventional gamma camera is available. The portable gamma camera also allows for intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy in situations when intraoperative injection is desired. This especially is the case in sentinel node mapping for other tumours such as laryngeal and colon cancers.
Conclusion
A field of view of 20 × 20 cm appears sufficient to detect axillary and extra-axillary sentinel nodes in most cases of breast cancer. The preoperative yield of sentinel nodes with a portable gamma camera is however less than the yield on conventional gamma camera images. This difference in yield is not significant if adequate injection site shielding is used. Preoperative sentinel node mapping with a portable gamma camera might be an alternative to guide intraoperative harvesting when no conventional gamma camera is available or when intraoperative tracer injection is required. In other situations, sequential lymphoscintigraphic imaging with a conventional gamma camera remains the modality of choice.
References
Tanis PJ, van Sandick JW, Nieweg OE, Valdés Olmos RA, Rutgers EJ, Hoefnagel CA, et al. The hidden sentinel node in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:305–11.
Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: update of a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:983–90.
Buscombe J, Paganelli G, Burak Z, Waddington W, Maublant J, Prats E, et al. Sentinel node in breast cancer procedural guidelines. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:2154–9.
Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, Moffat F, Klimberg S, Shriver C, et al. The sentinel lymph node in breast cancer—a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med 1998;339:941–6.
Dixon JM, Mak C, Radhakrishna S, Kehoe T, Millar AM, Wong D, et al. Effectiveness of immediate preoperative injection of radiopharmaceutical and blue dye for sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:795–9.
Mathew MA, Saha AK, Saleem T, Saddozai N, Hutchinson IF, Nejim A. Pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy before sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Breast 2010;19:28–32.
Varghese P, Abdel-Rahman AT, Akberali S, Mostafa A, Gattuso JM, Carpenter R. Methylene blue dye—a safe and effective alternative for sentinel lymph node localization. Breast J 2008;14:61–7.
Paredes P, Vidal-Sicart S, Zanón G, Roé N, Rubí S, Lafuente S, et al. Radioguided occult lesion localisation in breast cancer using an intraoperative portable gamma camera: first results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:230–5.
Valdes-Olmos RA, Vidal-Sicart S, Nieweg OE. SPECT-CT and real-time intraoperative imaging: new tools for sentinel node localization and radioguided surgery? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:1–5.
Vermeeren L, Valdés Olmos RA, Klop WM, Balm AJ, van den Brekel MW. A portable gamma-camera for intraoperative detection of sentinel nodes in the head and neck region. J Nucl Med 2010;51:700–3.
Sánchez F, Fernández MM, Giménez M, Benlloch JM, Rodríguez-Alvarez MJ, García de Quirós F, et al. Performance tests of two portable mini gamma cameras for medical applications. Med Phys 2006;33:4210–20.
Kitajima M, Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Mukai M, Kubo A. Credentialing of nuclear medicine physicians, surgeons, and pathologists as a multidisciplinary team for selective sentinel lymphadenectomy. Cancer Treat Res 2005;127:253–67.
Ogasawara Y, Yoshitomi S, Sato S, Doihara H. Clinical significance of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. J Surg Res 2008;148:191–6.
Tanaka C, Fujii H, Shiotani A, Kitagawa Y, Nakamura K, Kubo A. Sentinel node imaging of laryngeal cancer using a portable gamma camera with CdTe semiconductor detectors. Clin Nucl Med 2005;30:440–3.
Scopinaro F, Tofani A, di Santo G, Di Pietro B, Lombardi A, Lo Russo M. High-resolution, hand-held camera for sentinel-node detection. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2008;23:43–52.
Mathelin C, Salvador S, Huss D, Guyonnet L. Precise localization of sentinel lymph nodes and estimation of their depth using a prototype intraoperative mini gamma-camera in patients with breast cancer. J Nucl Med 2007;48:623–9.
Calvo Morón C, de la Riva Pérez PA, Cambil Molina T, Alvarez Márquez E, Castro Montaño J. Brain perfusion image with a portable mini-gamma camera (Sentinella) in brain death. Rev Esp Med Nucl 2009;28:83–4.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by RTICC RD06/0020/0038 and AGAUR 2009 SGR 1049.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vidal-Sicart, S., Vermeeren, L., Solà, O. et al. The use of a portable gamma camera for preoperative lymphatic mapping: a comparison with a conventional gamma camera. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38, 636–641 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1682-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1682-z