Abstract
Objective
Disorders of the nail can pose a diagnostic challenge, and non-invasive imaging is frequently required to clarify diagnosis and delineate anatomy pre-operatively. We explored the use of high-resolution ultrasonography in the assessment of patients with nail disorders attending orthopaedic hand clinics.
Methods
A search of a university teaching hospital musculoskeletal radiology database identified 36 patients (mean age 54.2 years) where ultrasonography was used to assess nail-related disorders between April 2003 and January 2007. Clinical, surgical and histological findings were correlated in these cases with ultrasound reports.
Results
Ultrasound findings correlated with the provisional diagnosis in 20 (61%) of 33 patients and provided a diagnosis in 3 patients where a provisional diagnosis was unavailable. In 7 of the 13 cases where the clinical diagnosis differed from ultrasound findings, a lump originally diagnosed as cystic in origin was shown to be solid on ultrasound. Different nail pathologies showed different characteristics on ultrasonography, including differences in vascularity, echogenicity, changes in nail structure/shape and extension into the nail bed, matrix, fold or evidence of bony erosion. The ultrasound findings correlated with histological analysis and intra-operative assessment in 10 of 15 patients who underwent operative treatment.
Conclusion
Ultrasound provides important information on the anatomy of the nail apparatus and can differentiate solid and cystic lesions. It can be used as a diagnostic tool and can therefore help in pre-operative planning of nail-related disorders. In our series ultrasound supported or improved upon the clinical diagnosis in 31 (86%) out of the 36 patients presenting with nail-related disorders.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Management of nail bed and nail-related pathology has traditionally relied on clinical examination, scrapings or biopsies of the nail and underlying skin [1]. The presence of the nail plate and the complex anatomy of the nail bed make it difficult to accurately identify the pathology or exactly define the involvement of the different elements of the nail apparatus. Certain nail conditions, such as subungual glomus tumours, may be too small to biopsy, and incomplete surgical excision can lead to recurrence [2]. In such cases non-invasive imaging can aid accurate assessment of the anatomy of the nail apparatus before surgery. Options include radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computerised tomography (CT) or ultrasound scanning. Of these methods, ultrasound is readily available and is capable of differentiating various echogenicities within the nail apparatus [3] (Figs. 1 and 2) with characteristic sonographic appearances seen in benign tumours and pseudo tumours, psoriasis, cysts and vascular abnormalities [3, 4]. Owing to advances in high-frequency imaging and small portable devices, ultrasonography has become an increasingly popular method of assessing nail-related disorders. Ultrasound carries no risk of radiation, has no contraindications and is cheaper and less time consuming to perform, but its role as a primary imaging method in nail-related disease is not fully established. This study explores the use of high-resolution ultrasonography in the assessment of patients with nail disorders attending hand clinics in an attempt to relate clinical, sonographic and histological findings and define the benefits of this imaging modality.
Methods
The musculoskeletal radiology database of a university hospital was searched to identify patients who had ultrasonography for nail-related disorders between April 2003 and January 2007. The computerised radiology information system (CRIS) database was searched for ultrasonographies performed by a single operator. The search term ‘nail’ was used, and 36 patients were identified. Each patient presented to a hand clinic before investigation. A review of the clinical notes provided data on the nature of the presenting complaint and provisional diagnosis. We also collected the surgical findings and histological diagnoses on patients who had surgery or had a biopsy. All information was obtained from the reports, and no attempt was made to assess the images retrospectively. We looked at the outcome of these patients in relation to the ultrasound reports and clinic letters.
A single experienced musculoskeletal radiologist using a HD5000 ATL Phillips machine performed ultrasonographic examinations using linear array high-resolution probes (5–17 MHz) or the hockey stick probe (10–17MHz). Routine examination included assessment of the nail, germinal matrix, nail bed, nail fold and the surrounding soft tissue. The attributes of the lump studied by ultrasound were size and shape, nature (solid, cystic), margins (defined, ill defined) and its vascularity. The effect on surrounding structures was identified by documenting the following attributes: defect in bone, defect in the nail structure, extension into the matrix, nail fold, nail bed, underlying bone, tendon and ligament. The distal interphalangeal joint and the distal attachments of the extensor and flexor tendons were also assessed. Colour and power Doppler studies were used when needed. Dynamic examination added information about tethering/deep attachment of any lump. It is a routine practise to look for all these attributes, but the report mentions only the relevant positive and negative findings.
Results
Between April 2003 and January 2007, 3,936 ultrasound examinations were performed for musculoskeletal indications. Of the 1,311 (33%) assessments undertaken for hand and wrist disorders, 36 (0.9%) were for nail-related disorders. Thirteen patients were men and 23 women with a mean age of 54.2 years (range 14 – 80 years). The two commonest digits assessed were the middle (47%) and index (25%) fingers.
Twenty-seven of the 36 patients presented with a ‘lump’ in isolation or with associated pain. The remaining patients presented after an injury or with infection. A senior surgeon examined each patient at initial consultation, and a provisional diagnosis was made for 33 (92%) of the 36 patients. Three patients had no provisional diagnosis. One patient presented with two nail lumps with two different provisional diagnoses, and 11 patients had a nail deformity when imaged.
Ultrasound findings correlated with the provisional diagnoses in 59% (20 of 34) of the cases (Table 1). In 14 cases ultrasonography either refined the provisional clinical diagnoses or provided a diagnosis in cases where clinical assessment was equivocal, and in the three patients in whom no provisional diagnosis was made, ultrasonography yielded a diagnosis. In two of these three patients, ultrasound diagnosis was confirmed with subsequent histological analysis, and in one patient the condition resolved without surgical intervention. In 7 (54%) of the 13 patients with a provisional diagnosis of cystic lump, ultrasonography suggested the lump was solid rather than cystic in nature. Histological analysis provided confirmation of this for five cases.
Fifteen patients (42%) required surgical intervention: 12 had their lumps excised, 2 underwent exploration and debridement, and 1 patient had the nail bed refashioned. Ten (83%) of 12 excised lumps underwent histological analysis, and the reports were reviewed. Six of 10 ultrasonographic diagnoses were confirmed on histology. This included three giant cell tumours of the tendon sheath and three glomus tumours. Histology did not confirm the ultrasonographic findings in four patients, two of whom had a granuloma instead of the suspected glomus tumour, and two had a benign cyst instead of the suspected giant cell tumour of the tendon sheath. These four cases were assessed during the early part of the radiologist’s learning curve, and as the swellings were found to be non-compressible, they were thought to be giant cell tumour or glomus tumour on ultrasound assessment rather than benign cysts. Four of the five patients who had no biopsies taken had the same intra-operative diagnosis as that indicated by ultrasonographic findings with two cysts (ganglions), one foreign body and one related to trauma (refashioning of nail matrix). One patient who had no abnormal intra-operative findings had no definite ultrasound diagnosis. Eleven patients (73%) had complete resolution and four (27%) had partial resolution of their symptoms after surgery. Of the patients treated conservatively only one patient, with a diagnosis of chronic nail infection, reported no improvement in symptoms. One patient was lost to follow-up after ultrasound examination had identified osteoarthritic changes as the cause of a painful lump.
Overall ultrasound examination yielded an accurate diagnosis in 31 out of 36 (86%) patients, 21 of whom did not need surgery and 15 who did. Table 1 summarises all the patients’ results.
Discussion
Although some common disorders of the nail, such as a mucous cyst, are easy to identify, other disorders of the nail can pose a diagnostic challenge. A spectrum of pathological processes can lead to symptomatic nail complaints, but deformation of the nail plate or a change in colour may be the only visible clinical manifestations [1], making it difficult to arrive at a definite diagnosis. When clinical examination is equivocal, non-invasive imaging techniques may be needed to aid diagnosis and assess the anatomy of the nail apparatus.
Plain radiography has traditionally been the complementary imaging method for the nail and distal phalanx but provides little information on soft tissue structures [5]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, less commonly, computerised tomography (CT) can be used in the assessment of nail pathology. With advances in transducer technology, ultrasonography has become a useful adjunct in the diagnosis and management of select group of patients with nail disease [6]. The nail apparatus is composed of tissues of varying echogenicities well suited to ultrasonographic assessment [3]. Conditions such as glomus tumours, cysts, radiologically occult bone erosions and radio-transparent foreign bodies can be detected by ultrasonography [5] and the site and dimension of the lesions defined. It may also be used to assess systemic diseases with nail manifestations, such as systemic lupus erythematosis, systemic sclerosis and psoriasis. In psoriasis, ultrasonography is used to monitor disease progression [3]. Ultrasound is a non-invasive, non-ionizing method that is readily available. It is capable of identifying subungual glomus tumours as small as 2–3 mm in diameter [7, 8] and when supplemented with colour duplex sonography has a 100% identification rate for glomus tumours allowing complete resection with no long-term recurrence at 6 years after surgery [8] (Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7). In patients presenting with injury, ultrasound can detect the site and extension of lacerations, dislocated nail fragments and disruption of the extensor tendon at its insertion into the distal phalanx [3]. Similarly, post-traumatic sequelae, such as epidermoid cysts, can be identified along with elements of fibrous tumours and vascular lesions [5, 9]. Magnetic resonance imaging can provide more accurate anatomical definition and differentiation of nail tumours [9, 10], including information on the histological type of glomus tumours [7], but its expense prohibits routine use [10]. An MRI scan can cost nine times more than an ultrasound scan [8]. It has also been suggested that MRI should only be employed in the assessment of glomus tumours when the clinical diagnosis is in doubt [11].
In our study, clinical assessment proved accurate for only 20 of the 34 (59%) provisional clinical diagnoses in 33 patients. In three patients, no provisional diagnosis was available. Ultrasound provided a definitive diagnosis in these three patients but also improved upon the provisional diagnoses in 13 other patients. Overall ultrasound yielded an appropriate diagnosis in 31 out of 36 (86%) patients. Histological analysis did not confirm four of the ultrasound diagnoses, and in one patient the underlying complaint of post-traumatic lump remained unclear despite imaging and surgical exploration. Fortunately this patient reported complete resolution of symptoms. These findings are in keeping with those of other studies advocating the use of ultrasonography in the assessment of nail lumps [2–4, 8, 12].
Our findings demonstrate that ultrasound is a valuable imaging method in assessing different nail pathologies. It is well suited to assess the different tissue planes of the nail apparatus and can accurately differentiate cystic and solid lesions. Ultrasonography provided additional information that could not be obtained by clinical examination alone. The size of the lesion could be easily measured and the shape outlined. The nature (solid/cystic) and margins (defined/ill defined) of lumps provided further description about the characteristics of the nail pathologies. Increased vascularity was seen in glomus tumours; margins were well defined in all cysts and giant cell tumours but ill defined in glomus tumours. Dynamic assessment could be employed to assess tethering to the tendon especially in those with giant cell tumours or cysts. Defects in the nail structure and anatomical extension into the nail bed, matrix, fold or bony erosion could be studied, particularly in cases of glomus tumour (Table 2). Certain characteristics, including echogenicity, vascularity and extension into surrounding structures could be defined. Ultrasonography is a particularly helpful diagnostic tool and aids pre-operative planning. This can help to prevent unnecessary tissue dissection minimising additional trauma to the nail apparatus and the resulting deformity [8]. It also reduces the risk of incomplete excision of lumps, such as a glomus tumour, which increases the risk of recurrence [2].
Ultrasound examination was found to be particularly useful in differentiating tissue densities. It helped distinguish between solid tumours and fluid collection due to infection; allowed clear definition of the margins of lesions; and delineated the size, shape, and extent of recurrent lesions, permitting local staging and aiding in pre-operative planning (Table 2).
There are limitations in this study. The ultrasound operator was not blinded, and the provisional diagnosis was available at the time of the scan. Knowledge of the provisional diagnosis could have influenced the imaging report. It is a retrospective study with small numbers, and the diagnosis group includes a mixture of clinical diagnosis with surgical and nonsurgical patients.
Conclusion
Ultrasound represents an important imaging adjunct in the assessment of select cases with nail pathology where the diagnosis is unclear. It is readily available and can be performed quickly with no discomfort and minimal inconvenience to the patient. Ultrasound can provide important information on the anatomy of the nail, nail fold and germinal matrix and can be used as a diagnostic tool and in pre-operative planning. It carries no risk of radiation, is cheaper to perform than MRI and can be used for long term follow-up of disorders of the nail and associated anatomical structures and tissues.
References
Mogensen M, Thomsen JB, Skovgaard LT, Jemec GB. Nail thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography and 20-MHz ultrasonography. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157(5):894–900.
Matsunaga A, Ochiai T, Abe I, et al. Subungual glomus tumour: evaluation of ultrasound imaging in preoperative assessment. Eur J Dermatol. 2007;17(1):67–9.
Wortsman X, Jemec GB. Ultrasound imaging of nails. Dermatol Clin. 2006;24(3):323–8.
Wortsman X, Wortsman J, Soto R, et al. Benign tumors and pseudotumors of the nail: a novel application of sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(5):803–16.
Drape JL. Imaging of the tumors of the perionychium. Hand Clin. 2002;18(4):655–70. Discussion 671.
Wortsman X, Gutierrez M, Saavedra T, Honeyman J. The role of ultrasound in rheumatic skin and nail lesions: a multi-specialist approach. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(6):739–48.
Theumann NH, Goettmann S, Le Viet D, et al. Recurrent glomus tumors of fingertips: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology. 2002;223(1):143–51.
Chen SH, Chen YL, Cheng MH, Yeow KM, Chen HC, Wei FC. The use of ultrasonography in preoperative localization of digital glomus tumors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(1):115–9. Discussion 120.
Drape JL. Imaging of tumors of the nail unit. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2004;21(4):493–511. v.
Takemura N, Fujii N, Tanaka T. Subungual glomus tumor diagnosis based on imaging. J Dermatol. 2006;33(6):389–93.
Van Geertruyden J, Lorea P, Goldschmidt D. Glomus tumours of the hand. A retrospective study of 51 cases. J Hand Surg Br. 1996;21(2):257–60.
Hirai T, Fumiiri M. Ultrasonic observation of the nail matrix. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21(2):158–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, R., Bryson, D., Singh, H.P. et al. High-resolution ultrasonography in assessment of nail-related disorders. Skeletal Radiol 41, 1251–1261 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1426-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1426-1