Abstract
Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a complex disease entity comprised of three distinct clinical syndromes that demonstrate indistinguishable histology. These syndromes are: eosinophilic granuloma, which is predominantly osseous or pulmonary; Hand-Schûller-Christian’s disease, which involves multiple organ systems and, most typically, the skull base; and Letterer-Siwe’s disease, the most severe disease manifestation, which typically involves the abdominal viscera. This article reviews our current understanding of Langerhans cell histiocytosis by discussing the history, histology, etiology, and treatment of the disease. It focuses on the radiographic findings and imaging modalities that are the most useful in disease diagnosis and management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The clinical entity now known as Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) has a long, confusing history, and the cause remains enigmatic [1, 2]. The first description was by Dr. Thomas Smith in 1865 [3]. He described a four-year-old child who died of whooping cough and was found at autopsy to have an erythematous skin disorder and several destructive lesions in his skull. In 1868, Paul Langerhans described a non-pigmentary dendritic cell in the epidermis, which he considered to be bone-marrow-derived and to represent the most peripheral output of the immune system [4]. There is now strong evidence that proliferation of these cells was not only the cause of Dr. Smith’s patient’s disorder, but was also one of a series of three entities subsequently known as Langerhans cell histiocytosis [1, 2].
In 1893, Alfred Hand, a physician in Philadelphia, described a three-year-old child with exophthalmos, polyuria, and great thirst [5]. Although Hand’s initial impression was that the child had tuberculosis, he corrected that impression in 1921 [6] after Artur Schûller in 1915 described two children with similar findings who had no evidence of tuberculosis [7]. In 1920, Dr. Henry A. Christian described a five-year-old child with changes known as “Christian’s triad,” which consisted of calvarial lesions, diabetes insipidus, and exopthalmos [8]. This complex syndrome, which includes visceromegaly and skin lesions, is now known as Hand-Schûller-Christian’s disease.
In 1924, Erich Letterer described an acute non-leukemic fatal disorder of the reticuloendothelial system in a six-month-old child [9]. Nine years later, Sture Siwe described a similar case of a very young child with splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, lymphadenopathy, bone tumors, hemorrhaging, and generalized histocytic hyperplasia [10]. In 1936, Arthur Abt and Edward Denenholz reported another patient with similar findings, but, after reviewing the prior literature, decided that it was appropriate to name the disease Letterer-Siwe’s disease [11].
Drs. Sadao Otani and Joseph Ehrlich from Mount Sinai and Lebanon Hospitals [12] and Louis Lichtenstein and Henry L. Jaffe from the Hospital for Joint Diseases [13] in New York City almost simultaneously reported solitary granulomatous histiocytic lesions of bone, which they named eosinophilic granuloma. The lesions, unlike those found in the other two forms of the disease, were confined to the bone and were benign in nature [14]. In 1942, William T. Green and Sidney Farber linked eosinophilic granuloma to Letterer-Siwe’s disease and Hand-Schûller-Christian’s disease on the basis of almost identical histologic patterns [15]. Jaffe and Lichtenstein [16] concluded the same. Lichtenstein [17] subsequently suggested that the three entities be named histiocytosis-X. It was, however, Friedman and Hanaoka in 1969 [18] and Nezelof et al. in 1973 who concluded that the cells which appeared in all three forms of the disease were Langerhans granuloma cells and proposed that the name be changed to Langerhans cell histiocytosis [19]. It is striking that the three diseases are so different in presentation, degree of disability, and survival, and, yet, the histology is indistinguishable.
The cause of the disease... remains a mystery
There have been multiple attempts by scientists to define the cause of the three disorders using extensive virologic analyses and genetic studies [20–34]. In favor of an infectious etiology is the disseminated nature of the disease and the almost spontaneous remission of the milder forms. In favor of a neoplastic etiology is the presence of generalized and fatal disease in some patients not unlike a lymphomatous or leukemic disorder.
It was suggested in 1991 that the Epstein-Barr virus was the cause [35]. In 1993, it was proposed that the diseases were caused by Human Herpes virus 6 (HHV6) or Herpes virus 9 (HHV8) [27, 29]. McClain et al., on a very thorough analysis, were unable to find evidence for the presence of the HHV, adenovirus, CMV, Epstein-Barr virus, herpes simplex, HIV, T-cell leukemia 1 or 2, or parvovirus [30]. Attempts at identifying a genetic error have failed to find a consistent abnormality in the gene structure for the three diseases. Currently, the genetic constitution of the Langerhans cell has not been found to differ significantly from other interdigitating dendritic cells [21, 22, 24, 26, 28, 36]. Although an occasional positive family history has been reported, the finding is rare [20, 37]. Exposure to noxious agents has not been identified as a potential cause.
The disease has some similarity to Erdheim-Chester disease, another histiocytosis that involves the bone marrow, but there are significant differences in the appearance of the cells and clinical course [24].
Unusual histology of Langerhans cell histiocytosis
As implied in the above description of the contribution of Paul Langerhans, the principal cell present in all three of the lesions that comprise the entity is a monocyte that has some unusual characteristics. As described by Langerhans, the cell is a non-pigmentary dendritic cell, which he considered to be bone-marrow-derived and to represent the most peripheral output of the immune system, residing in the epidermis [1, 24, 25]. The cell resembles other monocytic elements, but has a vesicular nucleus with a groove parallel to the long axis and vacuolated cytoplasm (Fig. 1) [24]. Occasionally, binucleate cells are evident, but cell replication is unusual [22, 24, 38]. Tiny linear-rod-shaped inclusions in the cytoplasm called Birbeck’s granules are best seen on electron microscopy [22, 24, 39]. Most of the Langerhans cells are positive for S-100 protein and CD1a, CD40, CD52, and CD154 [22, 24, 26, 28, 36]. The levels of the tumor suppressor P-53 may be decreased in some of the cells, but its expression level has not been correlated with outcome [40], suggesting that the gene is not involved in regulating the proliferation of these cells.
Perhaps the most striking feature of the histology is the presence of eosinophils, which are sometimes so frequent so as to dominate the histologic presentation [22, 24, 38]. The combination of histiocytes and eosinophils is unusual in pathologic specimens. The principal differential for histiocytosis is from Hodgkin’s lymphoma, in which eosinophils are often present. However, Hodgkin’s lymphoma has a distinguishing feature, the multinucleated Reed-Sternberg cell, which is not present in Langerhans histiocytosis [22, 24].
Presentation of the three syndromes
Eosinophilic granuloma
Eosinophilic granuloma is a benign disease limited to bone or lung and most often found in children under 15 years of age [21, 23, 41–43]. While bone lesions are most often asymptomatic, they may be the site of fracture and be a source of pain, swelling, deformity, and, sometimes, a soft tissue component [44]. Pulmonary eosinophilic granuloma in children is part of multisystem disease, unlike in adults [45]. It is often symptomatic with tachypnea, dyspnea, cough, and complications of spontaneous pneumothorax and pleural effusions; however, radiographic findings may precede symptoms [45, 46]. In children, pulmonary disease is not associated with a worse prognosis and isolated pulmonary involvement is rare [47]. In children younger than 10 years of age, it can regress spontaneously.
The osseous lesions of eosinophilic granuloma present more than 50% of the time as a lytic, modestly destructive lesion of a flat bone, such as the skull, mandible, ribs, and pelvis (Fig. 2) [43]. In the skull, the lesions are characteristically areas of osteolysis with sharp borders, giving a characteristic “punched out” appearance [45] and measure 1–4 cm in diameter [44]. The lytic lesions of the skull may retain a small, residual bone fragment or sequestrum, resembling that seen in other diseases, such as osteomyelitis [43, 44]. Lesions of the pelvis may present as poorly defined areas of osteolysis that become progressively circumscribed as they mature [43]. Lesions of the scapula may demonstrate an ovoid pattern of lysis that may or may not have a sclerotic margin (Fig. 3) [43].
Lesions within a long bone are often in the diaphysis of the femur, tibia, or humerus. They may be present in the metaphysis or extend to the physis and epiphysis; however, isolated epiphyseal involvement is rare [44]. Solitary long-bone lesions average in size from 4 cm to 6 cm [43]. They typically produce a “scallop from within” appearance (endosteal scalloping) without a break in the cortex or soft tissue mass. Cortical thinning, intracortical tunneling, and medullary widening are often demonstrated on radiography [44]. While less common, periosteal reaction or a permeative pattern of cortical involvement may be present at an early phase of disease, giving the lesion a more aggressive and pseudomalignant appearance (Fig. 4) [43–45].
Lesions may occur in the spine and, on occasion, in multiple sites [22, 24, 38]. A vertebral segment lesion is characteristically osteolytic initially, but results in a “vertebra plana”—a symmetrical flattening of the vertebra, often in a growing child, with intervertebral disc space preservation and sparing of the posterior elements (Fig. 5) [16, 21–24, 27, 42].
Once a primary osseous lesion is identified, evaluation of the skeleton for additional lesions is usually undertaken. Clinically, alkaline phosphatase may be slightly elevated [22, 24]. A skeletal survey using conventional radiography is sensitive for lesion detection. However, some lesions are detected by radionuclide bone scan that are not detected by skeletal survey and vice versa [48–51]. For this reason, the authors have recommended the use of both imaging modalities for the initial evaluation of eosinophilic granuloma, with follow up using either skeletal survey [48] or bone scan [49, 51]. However, the radiation dose is higher for skeletal survey compared to bone scintigraphy. The bone scan is often positive at the site of actively growing bone lesions (Fig. 2c), while it may be negative when lesions are stable in size and are being treated [52].
Evaluation of eosinophilic granuloma and the osseous lesions of Langerhans cell histiocytosis with CT is helpful to confirm the presence of a lesion, and to determine the extent of cortical destruction and the amount of soft tissue involvement [45, 52]. Small lesions may not be detected on routine radiography and may first be identified on CT. In addition, CT is useful in guiding biopsy to diagnose eosinophilic granuloma as a cause of vertebral osteolysis or vertebra plana (Fig. 6d).
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a highly sensitive, but nonspecific, modality to detect bone marrow involvement and soft tissue mass in eosinophilic granuloma [52]. The lytic lesions seen on radiography and CT are low signal, or isointense to muscle, on T1-weighted images and high signal on T2-weighted images (Figs. 6 and 7) [22, 24, 52]. Acute lesions may also demonstrate edema of marrow, periosteum, and soft tissues (Fig. 8) [45, 52]. Healing is associated with a decrease in T2 signal intensity. Given its specificity for the detection of metastatic disease [53], whole-body inversion recovery MRI may be effective in imaging the entire body for the extent of bone involvement of Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children with the significant benefit of no radiation exposure [54].
Experience with FDG-PET in evaluating osseous eosinophilic granuloma is limited and its use is still investigational. Early studies suggest that it is highly sensitive for lesion detection and specific for the phase of activity [55, 56]. In one small study of three patients [55], both bone scan and FDG-PET were able to detect active eosinophilic granuloma and the FDG-PET activity returned to base line in healed lesions, unlike bone scintigraphy. A second small study demonstrated that FDG-PET could detect lesion response to chemotherapy, which could not be distinguished with bone scanning [56].
Hand-Schûller-Christian’s disease
Hand-Schûller-Christian’s disease generally occurs in children under the age of 10 years old. It may occasionally appear in patients in their 20s and 30s, and more frequently in males [20, 22–24, 41, 42, 57, 58]. Retarded growth and development may be present and one third of the patients present with diabetes insipidus [21–23, 42, 57, 59, 60]. Anemia is present in a high percentage of patients and many have hepatosplenomegaly [21–24]. Patients also often present with exophthalmos, which may lead to blindness, and hearing loss is frequently present [20, 22, 23, 42, 61]. Many of the patients develop a progressive cerebellar ataxia after several years [62, 63].
One of the most distressing findings is a scaly seborrheic skin rash, often present at hair lines and hands and feet, and which may be the cause of bleeding [2, 7, 9, 12, 17, 20–24, 28, 58]. Pulmonary fibrosis may be present in the lungs and may cause serious, restrictive pulmonary disease, and even death [22, 62].
The condition has a propensity to form lesions at the base of the skull, and to involve the pituitary, which presumably accounts for the diabetes insipidus and exophthalmos. Pituitary involvement can sometimes be clearly identified by PET scanning [64]. Calvarial lesions are present in over 60% of the patients (Fig. 9) [21, 22, 24]. These are frequently multiple and may be sufficiently destructive to cause injury to the underlying neural tissue [62]. Teeth and gum problems are present in approximately 20% of the patients and mandibular deformity is a common finding [6]. Osseous lesions in other sites may be present in almost 50% of the patients and are often much more destructive than the lesions seen in eosinophilic granuloma [22, 24, 38, 41, 62].
Letterer-Siwe’s disease
Letterer-Siwe’s disease is the rarest of the Langerhans histiocytic lesions and also the most aggressive. The age for patients with Letterer-Siwe’s disease is usually less than 2 years, and males are more often affected than females. After a short period of normal growth and development, the affected children develop visceromegaly and lymphadenopathy [21, 22, 24, 42]. Hepatomegaly is especially common and some patients have damage to large- and medium-sized bile ducts. Those patients with bile duct involvement may present with findings of primary sclerosing cholangitis [65, 66]. They become severely stunted in growth and lose weight. Their intellectual development becomes severely impaired. Laboratory studies show marked anemia and thrombocytopenia.
Most of the children show destructive lesions in the skull, associated with brain damage, and lesions in the peripheral bones, associated with frequent fractures [21, 22, 24, 42]. The most evident clinical sign is a widespread papular, crusting hemorrhagic rash, which is associated with a severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Treatment has, until recently, had little effect, and early demise was the rule for these very ill children [22, 25, 62].
Treatment of patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis
It should be evident that the three syndromes are so markedly different that the treatment is very variable. For eosinophilic granuloma, treatment of a solitary lytic lesion affecting a long bone is best accomplished by curettage of the affected site and implantation of allograft bone chips or polymethylmethacrylate [22, 24] or injections of corticoids into the site [67, 68] (Fig. 2d). The lesions rarely recur and most of the patients remain free of disease for the remainder of their lifetimes. Vertebra plana lesions are sometimes best treated by observation [69, 70]. It is a curious fact that partial, or even complete, reconstitution of vertebral body height may occur with healing of the lesion.
Treatment of Hand-Schûller-Christian’s and Letterer-Siwe’s diseases is much more complex and, for the most part, not very effective. Corticosteroids have been utilized and seem effective initially, but, generally, they do not reverse the course of the diseases. Methotrexate and vinblastine can help the patients with Hand-Schûller-Christian’s disease, but are of little value for patients with Letterer-Siwe’s disease [71]. The use of growth hormones has been useful for patients with Hand-Schûller-Christian’s disease in terms of increasing their development to a modest extent [59]. More recently, interferon alpha with etoposide has shown some modest success [72, 73]. A recent report suggests that 2-chlorodeoxy-adenosine may allow for a complete remission of symptoms for patients with Hand-Schûller-Christian’s disease, and may be useful in maintaining survival for patients with Letterer-Siwe’s disease [74–78]. Marrow transplant has been utilized and seemed successful in several cases for a relatively short period of time [79]. Extensive bone lesions have been treated with bisphophonates with some improvement [80], and thalidomide appears to help severe skin problems [81].
It is somewhat distressing to realize that the three disorders with the name of Langerhans cell histiocytosis, which were originally described in the 19th century and are vastly different in presentation, have, thus, strongly resisted attempts to identify a neoplastic, infectious, or genetic cause. The distinctive feature for the three entities, which are very different in presentation and outcome, is the unique histologic characteristics which are characterized by the appearance of the Langerhans cells, the Birbeck’s granules, and the eosinophils. The treatment protocols, although better than they were 25 years ago, are still problematical for the two more severe disorders, and patients with both of these still disorders are, at times, severely affected and eventually die of disease.
References
Coppes-Zantinga A, Egeler RM. The Langerhans cell histiocytosis X files revealed. Br J Haematol 2002;116(1):3–9.
Komp DM. Historical perspectives of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1987;1(1):9–21.
Smith T. Skull cap showing congenital deficiency of bone. Trans Path Soc London 1865;16:224–5.
Langerhans P. Uber die Nerven der menschlichen Haut. Arch Pathol Anat 1868;44:325–37.
Hand A. Polyuria and tuberculosis. Arch Pediatr 1893;10:673–75.
Hand A. Defects of membranous bones, exophthalmos, and polyuria in childhood: is it dyspitutitarism? Am J Med Sci 1921;162:509–15.
Schüller A. Uber eigenartige schadeldefekte im jugendalter. Fortsch Gebiete Roentgenstrahlen 1915;23:12–8.
Christian HA. Defects in membranous bones, exophthalmos and diabetes insipidus: an unusual syndrome of dyspituitarism. Med Clin N Amer 1920;3:849–71.
Letterer E. Aleukamische retikulose (ein Beitrag zu den proliferativen Erkrankungen des Retikuloendothelialapparates). Frankfurt Zeitsch Pathol 1924;30:377–94.
Siwe S. Die reticuloendotheliose—ein neues krankheitsbild unter den hepatosplenomegalien. Zeitsch Kinderheilkunde 1933;55:212–47.
Abt A, Denenholz E. Letterer-Siwe’s disease: splenohepatomegaly, associated with widespread hyperplasia of non-lipoid-storing macrophages; discussion of the so-called reticulo-endotheliosis. Am J Dis Child 1936;51:499–22.
Otani S, Ehrlich J. Solitary granuloma of bone simulating primary neoplasm. Amer J Pathol 1940;16:479–90.
Lichtenstein L, Jaffe HL. Eosinophilic granuloma of bone. With report of a case. Amer J Pathol 1940;16:595–604.
Farber S. The nature of “Solitary or Eosinophilic Granuloma” of bone. Am J Pathol 1941;17:625–9.
Green WT, Farber S. Eosinophilic or solitary granuloma of bone. J Bone Jt Surg 1942;24:499–526.
Jaffe HL, Lichtenstein L. Eosinophilic granuloma of bone. A condition affecting one, several or many bones but apparently limited to the skeleton, and representing the mildest clinical expression of the peculiar inflammatory histiocytosis also underlying Letterer-Siwe disease and Schuller-Christian disease. Arch Pathol 1944;37:99–118.
Lichtenstein L. Histiocytosis X: integration of eosinophilic granuloma of bone, Letterer-Siwe disease, and Schuller-Christian disease as related manifestations of a single nosologic entity. Amer Med Assoc Arch Pathol 1953;56(1):84–102.
Friedman B, Hanaoka H. Langerhans cell granules in eosinophilic granuloma of bone. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1969;51(2):367–74.
Nezelof C, Basset F, Rousseau MF. Histiocytosis X histogenetic arguments for a Langerhans cell origin. Biomedicine 1973;18(5):365–71.
Arico M, Girschikofsky M, Genereau T, Klersy C, McClain K, Grois N, et al. Langerhans cell histiocytosis in adults. Report from the International Registry of the Histiocyte Society. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(16):2341–8.
Broadbent V, Gadner H, Komp DM, Ladisch S. Histiocytosis syndromes in children: II. Approach to the clinical and laboratory evaluation of children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Clinical Writing Group of the Histiocyte Society. Med Pediatr Oncol 1989;17(6):492–5.
Campanacci M. Bone and soft tissue tumors, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1999.pp. 857–76.
Chu T, D’Angio GJ, Favara BE, Ladisch S, Nesbit M, Pritchard J. Histiocytosis syndromes in children. Lancet 1987;2(8549):41–2.
Dorfman HD, Czerniak B. Bone tumors. Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri, 1997. pp. 690–701.
Egeler RM, D’Angio GJ. Langerhans cell histiocytosis. J Pediatr 1995;127(1):1–11.
Egeler RM, Favara BE, Laman JD, Claassen E. Abundant expression of CD40 and CD40-ligand (CD154) in paediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis lesions. Eur J Cancer 2000;36(16):2105–10.
Jenson HB, McClain KL, Leach CT, Deng JH, Gao SJ. Evaluation of human herpesvirus type 8 infection in childhood langerhans cell histiocytosis. Am J Hematol 2000;64(4):237–41.
Jordan MB, McClain KL, Yan X, Hicks J, Jaffe R. Anti-CD52 antibody, alemtuzumab, binds to Langerhans cells in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005;44(3):251–4.
Leahy MA, Krejci SM, Friednash M, Stockert SS, Wilson H, Huff JC, et al. Human herpesvirus 6 is present in lesions of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. J Invest Dermatol 1993;101(5):642–5.
McClain K, Jin H, Gresik V, Favara B. Langerhans cell histiocytosis: lack of a viral etiology. Am J Hematol 1994;47(1):16–20.
McClain K, Ramsay NK, Robison L, Sundberg RD, Nesbit M Jr. Bone marrow involvement in histiocytosis X. Med Pediatr Oncol 1983;11(3):167–71.
Scappaticci S, Danesino C, Rossi E, Klersy C, Fiori GM, Clementi R, et al. Cytogenetic abnormalities in PHA-stimulated lymphocytes from patients with Langerhans cell histocytosis. AIEOP-Istiocitosi Group. Br J Haematol 2000;111(1):258–62.
Willman CL, Busque L, Griffith BB, Favara BE, McClain KL, Duncan MH, et al. Langerhans’-cell histiocytosis (histiocytosis X)—a clonal proliferative disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331(3):154–60.
Willman CL, McClain KL. An update on clonality, cytokines, and viral etiology in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1998;12(2):407–16.
Dreyer ZE, Dowell BL, Chen H, Hawkins E, McClain KL. Infection-associated hemophagocytic syndrome. Evidence for Epstein-Barr virus gene expression. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1991;13(4):476–81.
Betts DR, Leibundgut KE, Feldges A, Pluss HJ, Niggli FK. Cytogenetic abnormalities in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Br J Cancer 1998;77(4):552–5.
Shahla A, Parvaneh V, Hossein HD. Langerhans cells histiocytosis in one family. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2004;21(4):313–20.
Jaffe HL. Metabolic, degenerative and inflammatory diseases of bones and joints. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1972. pp. 875–906.
Birbeck M, Breathnack A, Everall J. An electron microscope study of basal melanocytes and high-level clear cells (Langerhans cells) in vitiligo. J Invest Dermatology 1961;37:51–63.
Bank MI, Rengtved P, Carstensen H, Petersen BL. p53 expression in biopsies from children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2002;24(9):733–6.
Ghanem I, Tolo VT, D’Ambra P, Malogalowkin MH. Langerhans cell histiocytosis of bone in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 2003;23(1):124–30.
Kilpatrick SE, Wenger DE, Gilchrist GS, Shives TC, Wollan PC, Unni KK. Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis (histiocytosis X) of bone. A clinicopathologic analysis of 263 pediatric and adult cases. Cancer 1995;76(12):2471–84.
Stull MA, Kransdorf MJ, Devaney KO. Langerhans cell histiocytosis of bone. Radiographics 1992;12(4):801–23.
David R, Oria RA, Kumar R, Singleton EB, Lindell MM, Shirkhoda A, et al. Radiologic features of eosinophilic granuloma of bone. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153(3):1021–6.
Kilborn TN, Teh J, Goodman TR. Paediatric manifestations of Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a review of the clinical and radiological findings. Clin Radiol 2003;58(4):269–78.
Ha SY, Helms P, Fletcher M, Broadbent V, Pritchard J. Lung involvement in Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis: prevalence, clinical features, and outcome. Pediatrics 1992;89(3):466–9.
Smets A, Mortele K, de Praeter G, Francois O, Benoit Y, Kunnen M. Pulmonary and mediastinal lesions in children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Radiol 1997;27(11):873–6.
Van Nieuwenhuyse JP, Clapuyt P, Malghem J, Everarts P, Melin J, Pauwels S, et al. Radiographic skeletal survey and radionuclide bone scan in Langerhans cell histiocytosis of bone. Pediatr Radiol 1996;26(10):734–8.
Crone-Munzebrock W, Brassow F. A comparison of radiographic and bone scan findings in histiocytosis X. Skeletal Radiol 1983;9(3):170–3.
Dogan AS, Conway JJ, Miller JH, Grier D, Bhattathiry MM, Mitchell CS. Detection of bone lesions in Langerhans cell histiocytosis: complementary roles of scintigraphy and conventional radiography. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1996;18(1):51–8.
Howarth DM, Mullan BP, Wiseman GA, Wenger DE, Forstrom LA, Dunn WL. Bone scintigraphy evaluated in diagnosing and staging Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis and related disorders. J Nucl Med 1996;37(9):1456–60.
Azouz EM, Saigal G, Rodriguez MM, Podda A. Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis: pathology, imaging and treatment of skeletal involvement. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35(2):103–15.
Schmidt GP, Schoenberg SO, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk A. Whole-body MR imaging of bone marrow. Eur J Radiol 2005;55(1):33–40.
Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M, Miller SF, Babyn PS. Fast STIR whole-body MR imaging in children. Radiographics 2004;24(5):1317–30.
Binkovitz LA, Olshefski RS, Adler BH. Coincidence FDG-PET in the evaluation of Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis: preliminary findings. Pediatr Radiol 2003;33(9):598–02.
Blum R, Seymour JF, Hicks RJ. Role of 18FDG-positron emission tomography scanning in the management of histiocytosis. Leuk Lymphoma 2002;43(11):2155–7.
Dunger DB, Broadbent V, Yeoman E, Seckl JR, Lightman SL, Grant DB, et al. The frequency and natural history of diabetes insipidus in children with Langerhans-cell histiocytosis. N Engl J Med 1989;321(17):1157–62.
Gotz G, Fichter J. Langerhans’-cell histiocytosis in 58 adults. Eur J Med Res 2004;9(11):510–14.
Donadieu J, Rolon MA, Pion I, Thomas C, Doz F, Barkaoui M, et al. Incidence of growth hormone deficiency in pediatric-onset Langerhans cell histiocytosis: efficacy and safety of growth hormone treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89(2):604–9.
Maghnie M, Cosi G, Genovese E, Manca-Bitti ML, Cohen A, Zecca S, et al. Central diabetes insipidus in children and young adults. N Engl J Med 2000;343(14):998–1007.
Eckardt A, Schultze A. Maxillofacial manifestations of Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a clinical and therapeutic analysis of 10 patients. Oral Oncol 2003;39(7):687–94.
Kusumakumary P, James FV. Permanent disabilities in childhood survivors of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2000;17(5):375–81.
Imashuku S, Ishida S, Koike K, Ichikawa M, Minato T, Suzuki Y, et al. Cerebellar ataxia in pediatric patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2004;26(11):735–9.
Calming U, Bemstrand C, Mosskin M, Elander SS, Ingvar M, Henter JI. Brain 18-FDG PET scan in central nervous system langerhans cell histiocytosis. J Pediatr 2002;141(3):435–40.
Caldwell SH, Brantley K, Dent J, Keeley RC, Pruett T, Angle JF, et al. The hepatopulmonary syndrome masquerading as pulmonary Langerhans-cell histiocytosis. Hepatopulmonary Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1994;121(1):34–6.
Roberts EA. Primary sclerosing cholangitis in children. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999;14(6):588–93.
Capanna R, Springfield DS, Ruggieri P, Biagini R, Picci P, Bacci G, et al. Direct cortisone injection in eosinophilic granuloma of bone: a preliminary report on 11 patients. J Pediatr Orthop 1985;5(3):339–42.
Cohen M, Zornoza J, Cangir A, Murray JA, Wallace S. Direct injection of methylprednisolone sodium succinate in the treatment of solitary eosinophilic granuloma of bone: a report of 9 cases. Radiology 1980;136(2):289–93.
Bavbek M, Atalay B, Altinors N, Caner H. Spontaneous resolution of lumbar vertebral eosinophilic granuloma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004;146(6):165–7.
Nesbit ME, Kieffer S, D’Angio GJ. Reconstitution of vertebral height in histiocytosis X: a long-term follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1969;51(7):1360–8.
Steen AE, Steen KH, Bauer R, Bieber T. Successful treatment of cutaneous Langerhans cell histiocytosis with low-dose methotrexate. Br J Dermatol 2001;145(1):137–40.
Culic S, Jakobson A, Culic V, Kuzmic I, Scukanec-Spoljar M, Primorac D. Etoposide as the basic and interferon-alpha as the maintenance therapy for Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a RTC. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2001;18(4):291–4.
Ladisch S, Gadner H, Arico M, Broadbent V, Grois N, Jacobson A, et al. LCH-I: a randomized trial of etoposide vs. vinblastine in disseminated Langerhans cell histiocytosis. The Histiocyte Society. Med Pediatr Oncol 1994;23(2):107–10.
Goh NS, McDonald CE, MacGregor DP, Pretto JJ, Brodie GN. Successful treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. Respirology 2003;8(1):91–4.
Ottaviano F, Finlay JL. Diabetes insipidus and Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a case report of reversibility with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2003;25(7):575–7.
Pardanani A, Phyliky RL, Li CY, Tefferi A. 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine therapy for disseminated Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2003;78(3):301–6.
Rodriguez-Galindo C, Kelly P, Jeng M, Presbury GG, Rieman M, Wang W. Treatment of children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. Am J Hematol 2002;69(3):179–84.
Stine KC, Saylors RL, Saccente S, McClain KL, Becton DL. Efficacy of continuous infusion 2-CDA (cladribine) in pediatric patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2004;43(1):81–4.
Nagarajan R, Neglia J, Ramsay N, Baker KS. Successful treatment of refractory Langerhans cell histiocytosis with unrelated cord blood transplantation. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2001;23(9):629–32.
Farran RP, Zaretski E, Egeler RM. Treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis with pamidronate. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2001;23(1):54–6.
Sander CS, Kaatz M, Elsner P. Successful treatment of cutaneous 3langerhans cell histiocytosis with thalidomide. Dermatology 2004;208(2):149–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoover, K.B., Rosenthal, D.I. & Mankin, H. Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Skeletal Radiol 36, 95–104 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0193-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0193-2