Abstract
Microalgae are known to be abundant in various habitats around the globe, and are rich in high value-added products such as fatty acids, polysaccharides, proteins, and pigments. Microalgae can be exploited as the basic and primitive food source of aquatic animals. We investigated the effects of dietary supplementation with Schizochytrium sp., Spirulina platensis, Chloroella sorokiniana, Chromochloris zofingiensis, and Dunaliella salina on the growth performance, immune status, and intestinal health of zebrafish (Danio rerio). The results showed that these five microalgae diets could improve the feed conversion rate (FCR), especially the D. salina (FCR = 1.02%) and Schizochytrium sp. (FCR = 1.20%) additive groups. Moreover, the microalgae diets decreased the gene expression level of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL6, IL8, and IL1β at a normal physiological state of the intestine, especially the Schizochytrium sp., S. platensis, and D. salina dietary groups. The expression of neutrophil marker b7r was increased in the C. sorokiniana diet group; after, the zebrafish were challenged with Vibrio anguillarum, improving the ability to resist this disease. We also found that microalgae diets could regulate the gut microbiota of fish as well as increase the relative abundance of probiotics. To further explain, Cetobacterium was significantly enriched in the S. platensis additive group and Stenotrophomonas was higher in the Schizochytrium sp. additive group than in the other groups. Conversely, harmful bacteria Mycoplasma reduced in all tested microalgae diet groups. Our study indicated that these microalgae could serve as a food source supplement and benefit the health of fish.
Key points
• Microalgae diets enhanced the growth performance of zebrafish.
• Microalgae diets attenuated the intestinal inflammatory responses of zebrafish.
• Microalgae diets modulated the gut microbiota composition to improve fish health.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Various kinds of healthy and high value-added nutrition have been discovered in microalgae, such as proteins, carbohydrates, pigments (e.g., phycobillins and carotenoids), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) (e.g., eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)). Due to their potential nutraceutical and pharmaceutical properties, many microalgae species can be utilized as feed and food additives in the aquaculture industry (Dhandayuthapani et al. 2021; Yaakob et al. 2014). Along with the increasing production of aquatic animals, the demand for suitable microalgae in the aquaculture industry is increasing. The interplay between nutrition and the immune system is well recognized (Martin and Krol 2017). It is reported that microalgae can be an excellent immunostimulant that plays a role in enhancing fish immunity and improving the capacity of anti-infection (Ma et al. 2020). Microalgae and their derived bioactive ingredients have antibacterial, antiviral, and immunomodulation capabilities to modulate aquatic animals’ immune status and to protect them from pathogens.
Several studies have evaluated the beneficial effects of microalgae (such as Tetraselmis sp., Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Chlorella sp., Nannochloropsis oculata, Nannochloropsis gaditana, Lobosphaera incisa, and Schizochytrium sp.) on farmed fish, and explored the effects of microalgae on intestinal health of aquatic animals, including intestine immune status and microbial ecology (Bravo-Tello et al. 2017; Cerezuela et al. 2012, 2013;et al. Lazado et al. 2019; Nayak et al. 2018; Shi et al. 2021). The intestine is regarded as an important part of the immune system in fish. Gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) is one of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues (MALT) of teleost (Salinas and Parra 2015; Yu et al. 2020), consisting of the mucus layer and a variety of immune cells, which are responsible for the complicated immune responses to diseases. Besides, the microbial community inside the digestive tract is crucial to the health of fish (Bates et al. 2006). Interestingly, shortly after hatching, a variety of microorganisms that colonize the teleost intestine directly or indirectly interact with the host immune system and affect the host immune status (Kelly and Salinas 2017; Pérez et al. 2010). Nowadays, intensive aquaculture increases the severity and frequency of fish diseases. The high morbidity and mortality in commercial aquaculture are mainly caused by fish diseases, leading to the decrease of fish production and associated economic loss. Given the functional importance of the intestinal microbiome in host physiology, the regulation of the microbiome may be one of the feasible strategies to mitigate fish diseases in aquaculture. Changes in the microbiome brought by the diet may affect the susceptibility and potential resistance of fish to diseases (Xiong et al. 2019). Hence, a clear understanding of how animals’ physiological response and intestinal microbiota change after receiving microalgae feed is required. However, the mechanisms by which feed influences host-microbial immune interactions and its impact on fish health remain largely unexplored (Brestoff and Artis 2013; Clements et al. 2014; López Nadal et al. 2020). Since zebrafish have a short growth cycle and play an important role in the evolution of fish, they are excellent models to examine the effects of diet on the complex interactions between the microbiome and gut immune function (Galindo-Villegas 2016; Volff 2005). Very recently, a few studies investigated the effect of dietary microalgae L. incisa on gut health of model animal zebrafish (Lazado et al. 2019; Nayak et al. 2020).
In this work, we systemically evaluated the effects of dietary Schizochytrium sp., Spirulina platensis, Chlorella sorokiniana, Chromochloris zofingiensis, and Dunaliella salina on the growth, immune status, and microbiota of zebrafish (Fig. 1). We examined the indices of these microalgae dietary supplementation on growth performance, and expression of immune and inflammatory genes in zebrafish. Also, we performed next-generation sequencing of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acids (rRNA) amplicons, which were carried out on the total deoxyribonucleic acids (DNA) samples from zebrafish gut microbiota after feeding the diets supplemented with different microalgae. The results showed that these five different microalgae diets containing characteristic nutrition had positive effects on the expression of immune genes and the composition of gut microbiota.
Materials and methods
Animal experiment design
Diet preparation
Lyophilized microalgae powder, including S. platensis, C. sorokiniana, C. zofingiensis, and D. salina, was kindly supplied by SDIC Microalgae Biotechnology Center, SDIC Biotechnology Investment Co., Ltd (https://biotech.sdic.com.cn/gtsw/index.htm, Xizhimen Nanxiao Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China). Schizochytrium sp. (CCTCC AF 2,010,001) was obtained from China Center for Type Culture Collection. The strain was first cultured in 500-mL flask at 28 °C, and after 4 days, cells were harvested and lyophilized. The commercial diet, dried bloodworm, was grounded into a powder with a mixer. Experimental feeds were prepared by adding 15% (w/w) lyophilized microalgae powder from Schizochytrium sp., S. platensis, C. sorokiniana, C. zofingiensis, and D. salina to a commercial diet bloodworm (named as the Schi15%, Spla15%, Csor15%, Czof15%, and Dsal15% groups respectively). The mixtures which were doped with microalgae powder and bloodworm powder were added an appropriate amount of double distilled water, and made into a doughy shape. Then the mixture was made into wet pellets by passing through a 0.5 mm sieve. After that, the pellets were freeze-dried for 24 h, and then stored at − 20 °C in vacuumed plastic bags until used. Commercial feed without adding microalgae was processed with a similar procedure, as a control feed (the bloodworm group).
Zebrafish husbandry
Wild-type zebrafish (mean weight 0.21 ± 0.03 g) were obtained from local supplier and allocated to the breeding system with one group set per one tank (10 L) per dietary group type, about 110 tails per group. The experiment lasted 4 weeks and the temperature was maintained at 25 °C with a light/dark cycle of 14/10 h. During the culture period, the water quality parameters were maintained at a normal level, and the water was changed according to the water quality. Fish were hand-fed to visual satiety twice daily. The total fish weight of each group was recorded at the beginning and end of the experiment, and the feed consumption during the experiment was also collected. After gathering the final weights, the fish were randomly selected for pathogen challenge and sample collection.
Pathogen challenge
The wild-type Vibro anguillarum strain MVM425 was previously isolated and identified in our laboratory (Xiao et al. 2011). Strain V. anguillarum MVM425 was grown in LB20 medium at 28 °C for 16 h. Bacteria harvested by centrifugation were rinsed twice in sterile physiological seawater (PSW, NaCl, 20 g/L; NaHCO3, 0.11 g/L; KCl, 0.7 g/L; MgCl2⋅6H2O, 4.8 g/L; MgSO4⋅7H2O, 3.5 g/L; and CaCl2⋅2H2O, 1.6 g/L; pH 7.2) and diluted to the appropriate concentration in PSW for infection. Zebrafish were bath-challenged in the aerated bacterial PSW suspension of 2 × 108 CFU/mL (CFU, colony-forming units) V. anguillarum MVM425 for 10 min, then transferred to clean water for 5 min, and finally removed back to the rearing water.
Sample collection
At the end of the feeding trial, the fish in each tank were fasted for 24 h. Zebrafish were randomly selected from each group and placed on ice to be anesthetized and then dissected. The entire zebrafish gut was carefully removed, avoiding contamination from other smaller organs and visceral fat. Intestinal content samples for microbial community analysis were collected in sterile 1.5-mL tubes on dry ice, immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at − 85 °C until analysis. After this, the middle and the posterior intestine were separated and immediately placed in RNAstore Reagent (Tiangen, Beijing, China) for gene-expression analysis. From each group, thirty fish were randomly selected to collect the intestinal tissues and the gut microbial samples for gut associated gene expression and gut microbial community analysis, respectively. These thirty fish were assigned into three biological replicates (ten fish per pool). Another forty-five fish were randomly selected for challenge with V. anguillarum MVM425, and then thirty of them were collected the intestinal tissues (ten fish per pool) for gut associated gene expression analyses.
RNA extraction and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
The intestines of 10 fish were pooled (three pools per group) and frozen at − 85 °C. TRIzol (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used for total RNA extraction according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality and quantity of RNA were checked by Nanodrop oneC (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Then, 800 ng total RNA was used to synthesize first-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) using the PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) for real-time qPCR following the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting cDNA was used as a template for qPCR in a Bio-Rad CFX96™ real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) with SYBR Green mix (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). Reaction mixture (20 μL) contained 10 μL SYBR Select Master Mix, 1 μL of cDNA sample, 1 μL each of forward and reverse primers (500 nM), and 7 μL PCR-grade water. Primers used in this study are shown in Table S1 (Online Resource 1). The running program of real-time qPCR was composed of an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, and 60 °C for 30 s.
Relative expressions of target genes before challenge were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCT method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001), and β-actin was selected as the reference gene.
Biomolecule components analysis
Protein content analysis
The Kjeldahl method was used to determine the protein content of freeze-dried bloodworm and microalgae materials with some modifications (Nielsen 2017). Samples were precisely weighed at 500 mg. Ammonium sulfate as the positive standard and saccharose as the negative standard were also weighed. Briefly, the materials were digested in sulfuric acid with potassium sulfate and copper sulfate pentahydrate as catalysts for 1 h to convert the amine nitrogen into ammonium ions. Then, the ammonium ions in the samples were converted into ammonia and separated from the digestion mixture with a distiller (Xianjian Shanghai KDN-102A, Shanghai, China). Finally, the ammonia was determined by titration with a standard solution of hydrochloric acid. The percentage of nitrogen was converted to the content of crude protein with a factor of 6.25. Each sample was analyzed in duplicate.
Soluble sugar content analysis
The content of polysaccharides was measured by the phenol–sulfuric acid method with some modifications (Dubois et al. 1956). Samples (10 mg freeze-dried materials) were resuspended with 1 mL deionized water and broken up by ultrasonication (Scientz ultrasonic homogenizer JY92-IIN, Ningbo, China) at 150 W (working for 2 s, intermittent for 2 s) for 15 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 2000 g (Eppendorf 5810R, Hamburg, Germany) for 10 min at 4 °C. Briefly, the diluted samples were mixed with 0.5 mL 6% phenol solution and 3.5 mL concentrated sulfuric acid. After keeping still for 10 min, the mixture was vortexed and kept at 40 °C for 10 min. The absorbance at 490 nm was recorded. Later, the concentration was calculated according to the absorbance and the standard curve determined by dextrose solution.
Chlorophylls and total carotenoids analysis
The chlorophylls a and b, and total carotenoids content were determined by using the UV–VIS spectroscopy method (Lichtenthaler and Buschmann 2001). Samples were precisely weighed at 20 mg and the pigment content was extracted in 0.8 mL acetone by grinding for 2 min and ultrasonication (Scientz ultrasonic homogenizer JY92-IIN, Ningbo, China) at 150 W (working for 2 s, intermittent for 2 s) for 5 min on the ice. The mixture was centrifuged at 2000 g (Eppendorf 5810R, Hamburg, Germany) for 10 min at 4 °C. The pigment-containing phase in acetone was collected and transferred to a clean vessel. A further 0.8 mL of acetone was added to the residue, and the pigments were extracted and centrifuged again. After the extracted solution was mixed, filtrated, and diluted, an aliquot of this solution was added to a glass cuvette and exposed to the selected wavelengths (661.6 nm, 644.8 nm, and 470 nm). The absorbance was recorded, using acetone as the blank, and calculated according to the Lichtenthaler and Buschmann equations (Lichtenthaler and Buschmann 2001).
Lipid extraction
Lipids were extracted from the freeze-dried materials using a modified Folch method (Folch et al. 1957). Samples (60 mg freeze-dried materials) were dissolved with 3 mL chloroform and methanol solution (w/w = 2:1), vortexed for 2 min and broken up by ultrasonication for 3 min. Then the mixture was centrifuged at 2000 g (Eppendorf 5810R, Hamburg, Germany) for 10 min at 4 °C. The phase containing chloroform lipid was collected and transferred to a clean vessel. A further 2 mL of chloroform and methanol solution was added to the residue, vortexed, and centrifuged again. The combined lipid extracts were then evaporated under nitrogen gas flow.
Fatty acids composition analysis
Samples were transmethylated with 1% H2SO4 in dry methanol (v/v) at 70 °C for 0.5 h. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were extracted with cyclohexane containing 0.133 g/L methyl heptadecanoate (Aladdine, Shanghai, China) as the internal standard. FAME samples (1 µL) were then separated by gas chromatography (Agilent GC 6890, USA) with HP-5 Column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), during which the temperature gradient is from 120 (hold time 1 min) to 170 (linear increase of 10 °C min−1; hold time 2 min) and finally to 260 °C (linear increase of 3 °C min−1; hold time 3 min). Then the samples were detected by mass spectrometry (Agilent Technologies MS 5975I, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Compound identification was achieved by matching with mass spectra database (NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Library, Version 2.0d, USA). FAMEs were quantified by using the ratio of the peak area of each target compound to that of the internal standard.
Next-generation sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons
Extraction of genomic DNA
The DNA of the intestinal content was extracted by FastDNA SPIN Kit for soil (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA). The purity and concentration of DNA were tested by Nanodrop oneC (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DNA solutions were stored at − 85 °C.
Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis
Primer F357 (5′-CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′ with GC clamp in the 5’end) and R518 (5′-ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3′) were chosen for variable V3 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplification, which had been proved to be suitable for detecting zebrafish gut microbiota diversities in soil using DGGE analysis(Li et al. 2012). A GC-clamp was added to the terminal primer to improve electrophoretic separation amplicons by DGGE. The PCR reactions were conducted with Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The touchdown PCR was performed, and a two-step cycle was applied in the touchdown PCR; i.e., a denaturing step and an annealing step. The denaturing temperature was 95 °C, and the annealing temperature (68 °C) was gradually lowered (1 °C lower after each set of cycle) to 59 °C. A thirty-cycle amplification was then performed with an annealing temperature of 58 °C. Products were checked by electrophoresis in 2% (w/v) agarose gels and ethidium bromide staining. PCR products from each sample were separated by DGGE system (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) as follows: 9% polyacrylamide gels and a denaturing gradient from 35 to 65% were used; gels were electrophoresed in 1 × TAE buffer at 60 °C and 130 V for 6 h.
16S rDNA Illumina sequence analysis
The V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA genes were targeted for 16S rDNA Illumina sequence analysis and following taxonomy analysis. A linker with index was added to the end of the PCR product of 16S rDNA by PCR for next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the library was purified with magnetic beads. Then the library concentration was quantified to 10 nM, and PE250/FE300 paired-end sequencing was performed according to the Illumina MiSeq/Novaseq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) instrument manual. The sequence information was read by the MiSeq Control Software (MCS)/Novaseq Control Software (NCS) (https://support.illumina.com/sequencing/sequencing_instruments/miseq). The sequencing raw data was deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database (accession: PRJNA759359).
Following quality control, the sequences were aligned, checked for chimeric sequences, and clustered into different operational taxonomic units (OTUs) on the basis of 97% sequence similarity using VSEARCH (1.9.6) software (Rognes et al. 2016). The sequences were then classified according to the Silva 138 database (Yilmaz et al. 2014). Then, the RDP (Ribosomal Database Program) classifier Bayesian algorithm (Wang et al. 2007) was used to analyze the representative sequence of OTU species taxonomy, and count the community composition of each sample under different species classification levels.
Statistics and data analysis
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. t-tests were performed with GraphPad Prism software (Version 8.0.1, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) to determine statistical significance. p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Growth performance
The growth performance of the fish fed with the different experimental diets is shown in Table 1. The growth of all microalgae additive groups was better than that of the bloodworm-fed group. Regarding weight gain (WG) and weight gain rate (WGR), increases were found in the fish fed with different microalgae diets compared to the values of the fish in the bloodworm-fed group. Diet supplementary of S. platensis, C. sorokiniana, and C. zofingiensis showed a similar WGR of zebrafish, which were 2, 1.68, and 1.69 times to the WGR of the bloodworm group, respectively. The fish in the Schizochytrium sp. and D. salina additives groups displayed a significant bodyweight increase with above threefold of WGR compared to the bloodworm group. As for specific growth rate (SGR), the values in all the microalgae additives groups were observed to be higher than that in the bloodworm group, especially in the Schizochytrium sp. and D. salina additives groups. The best feed conversion ratio (FCR) was obtained from the group with a diet containing 15% D. salina, which means the fish in this group had the best growth. The other microalgae additive groups also showed better FCR.
Innate immunity response
To evaluate the impact of algal dietary supplementation on the expression of genes related to immune function, a real-time qPCR was performed using RNA isolated from the intestine of zebrafish fed with the different experimental diets. The expression of these genes is shown in Fig. 2.
For antigen recognition and signal transduction molecules, gene expression of toll-like 2 receptor (TLR2) and of TLR4 had a few changes in microalgae additive groups, compared to the bloodworm group. The gene TLR2 was downregulated in the Schi15% additive group, but not significant, and the TLR4 gene showed a similar downward tendency. The expression of myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88) and of the gene for nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) were significantly downregulated in the Schi15% additive group, and there was no difference between the bloodworm diet group and the others.
The gene expression of the inflammation related cytokines was examined, including the genes for pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), for interleukin beta (IL1β) and IL8, and for anti-inflammatory cytokine IL10. In the groups fed with Schi15%, Spla15% and Csor15% supplemented diets, the gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα and IL1β was significantly downregulated, but a downregulation of the IL8 was not apparent, as compared to the control. In the Dsal15% additive group, the gene expression level of IL1β was significantly downregulated, while the levels of TNFα and IL8 were also downregulated but not apparent. In addition, in the Czof15% group, these four cytokines displayed an upregulated expression trend compared with the bloodworm diet group.
Gene expression of antibacterial proteins with microalgae supplemented diet was also detected. Comparing the expression level to the control, the Csor15% supplemented diets led to an increasing trend in the gene expression of lysozyme; however, the other microalgae additive groups had no change.
Disease resistance
To further investigate the immunomodulatory properties of microalgae diets, the expression of immune-related genes in the intestine of surviving fish was measured. To assess the impact of microalgae diets on bacterially-challenged zebrafish immunity, the transcriptions of immune related genes were detected at 12 h post challenge with V. anguillarum MVM425, as shown in Fig. 3.
The gene expression of pathogen recognition receptors and downstream signaling cascades was examined at 12 h post challenge with V. anguillarm, including TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, MyD88, and NF-κB. For TLR2, the expression in all the microalgal supplementary groups had a higher level than that in the bloodworm diet group. In contrast, the gene expression of TLR4 and TLR5 in the microalgae additive groups was apparently downregulated. The expression of MyD88 in these algal supplementary groups attenuated, positively associated with the downregulation of TLR4 or TLR5, except that in the Csor15% additive group, the expression of MyD88 did not change. However, the expression of NF-κB in the Csor15% additive group appeared to rise as compared to that in the bloodworm diet group.
The transcriptional changes of cytokines related to inflammation in the mucosal tissues of zebrafish were further investigated after the V. anguillarum MVM425 challenge. The gene expression of IL1β, IL6, IL8, TNFα, and the gene for C–C Motif Chemokine Ligand 20 (CCL20) in the Schi15% additive group was apparently lower than in the bloodworm diet group. Similarly, downregulation by other microalgae supplementation was observed on the expression of IL6. The Csor15% diet group exhibited higher expression of the genes IL8, TNFα, and CCL20 compared to the bloodworm diet group.
The biomarker genes, mpeg1 and b7r, representing macrophages and neutrophils, as well as mpx, the marker gene of zebrafish mononuclear phagocytes (Wittamer et al. 2011), were also selected to investigate the changes in intestine of zebrafish after infection. The qPCR data indicated the expression of b7r in the Csor15% supplementary group was higher than that in the bloodworm diet group; while, the expression level of b7r in other microalgae additive groups was lower than that in the bloodworm group. As for mpx, the expression level was higher in the Spla15% additive group than that in the bloodworm group, and the other microalgal supplementary groups exhibited a downward trend. However, there was no significant change regarding the expression of mpeg1 among the groups.
Gut microbiota
DGGE analysis and 16S rDNA Illumina sequence analysis were performed to investigate the gut microbiota composition as shown in the Fig. S1 (Online Resource 1). In order to obtain species OTUs corresponding to classification information, we selected a representative sequence for each of the OTUs, and the RDP classifier was used for classification of species on the representative sequence annotation to obtain each sample’s community composition (Online Resource 2).
To estimate the number of OTUs in a community, abundance-based coverage estimator (Ace) and Chao1 indices are commonly used to measure community richness (Chao 1984, Chao and Lee 1992). Shannon and Simpson indices are commonly used to characterize community diversity (Hill 1973; Izsák and Papp 2000). Compared with the bloodworm group, the intestinal microbiome abundance of zebrafish in the Spla15% and Czof15% groups decreased (shown in Table 2). Conversely, the community abundance in the Csor15% group increased. In general, alpha-diversity decreased when fish were fed with microalgae diets.
The 30 most abundant OTUs were selected for clustering to show the similarity and difference between the data (Fig. 4a). In order to further investigate the diversity difference among the groups, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) analysis was performed (Fig. 4b), and the clustered samples were made up of similar microbial communities. Comparing the relative abundances of phylum in each group, it is found that the two most abundant species were Fusobacteriota and Proteobacteria (Fig. 4c). Interestingly, the proportion of Fusobacteriota in each algae meal diet group increased compared to the bloodworm diet group. Firmicutes accounted for 20.4% only in the bloodworm diet group, and none of the proportion in the other groups exceeded 2.5%. According to the community abundance data of different groups, differences of community structure between groups were detected, and the significant differences of species composition between groups were analyzed at the genus level. The genus with significant differences in abundance among the groups were Cetobacterium, Mycoplasma, Chitinibacter, Vibrio, and Shewanella (Fig. 4d). Comparing the relative distribution of at the genus level of each group, Cetobacterium was the most abundant genus among all groups. Moreover, the proportion of Mycoplasma in the bloodworm feed group was higher than that in the other groups. Compared with the ordinary diet group, the abundances of Chitinibacter in the Dsal15%, Schi15%, and Czof15% groups significantly decreased (p < 0.05), and Shewanella also significantly reduced in the Dsal15% diet group (p < 0.05).
Discussion
Microalgae diets enhanced the growth performance and immune status of zebrafish
Microalgae is an important food source for many aquatic animals (Shah et al. 2018; Yarnold et al. 2019). The non-toxic and nutritious characteristics of some microalgae meet the nutritional needs of fish. We used zebrafish as a model and added 15% of Schizochytrium sp., S. platensis, C. sorokiniana, C. zofingiensis, and D. salina to the feed. The data showed that dietary addition of these microalgae could improve the growth performance of zebrafish. Similar to our conclusion, Furbeyre et al. (2017) studied the effects of a microalgae diet on growth performance of mammalian piglets, and the results showed that pigs receiving diets supplemented with the Spirulina sp. or Chlorella sp. had higher digestibility in the jejunum compared with the control group.
Besides, the microalgae cells contain naturally active ingredients as shown in the Table 3. Because of their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory or anti-cancer activity, they have aroused interest in the food and pharmaceutical industry (Ávila-Román et al. 2018; Bito et al. 2020; Christaki et al. 2013; Ferrazzano et al. 2020; Talero et al. 2015). It is worth noting that, every microalga has its characteristic nutrients. For example, S. platensis has the highest protein content, C. sorokiniana contains the highest soluble polysaccharide, and C. zofingiensis has the highest total fatty acids. In our study, although the nutritional components of Schizochytrium sp. were similar to the ones of bloodworm (the control group), the zebrafish in the Schi15% additive group showed better growth performance than the fish in the control group. The analysis result of fatty acids composition indicated that DHA was solely detected in Schizochytrium sp., as shown is Table S2 (Online Resource 1), which means DHA might be the key factor of the fish’s rapid development in the Schizochytrium sp. group. Moreover, a certain amount of pigments were found in all the other microalgae we used except Schizochytrium sp. With the fact that every group of zebrafish grew well and were in healthy immune status, pigments could have a function of promoting the health of fish. In general, the nutritional components in every group had huge differences, and the growth performances of the fish in the microalgae diet groups were all better than those in the control group.
We explored the intestinal inflammatory status of zebrafish after the four-week microalgae dietary supplement, and most inflammatory cytokines in the Schi15%, Spla15%, Csor15%, and Dsal15% group declined with respect to the ordinary bloodworm feed group. These four microalgae diets attenuated the intestinal inflammatory responses at the normal physiological state of zebrafish. Similarly, Lazado et al. (2019) observed that the expression of IL1β was decreased in the zebrafish intestine with the increase of microalgae L. incisa feed. Another work showed that the expression of NF-κB was significantly increased in the kidneys of fish fed with the wild type and mutant L. incisa supplements; while, the gene for pro-inflammatory cytokine TNFα was significantly downregulated in the fish fed with both of the supplemented diets, as compared to the control (Nayak et al. 2018). However, in piglets, oral administration of S. platensis elevated the expression of IL8 in the ileum and oral administrated Chlorella vulgaris elevated IL1β expression in the jejunum (Furbeyre et al. 2018). Cerezuela et al. (2013) showed that the addition of microalgae (Tetraselmis chuii and P. tricornutum) alone or in combination with Bacillus subtilis increased the expression of the gene for pro-inflammatory cytokine IL8 in the gut of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Reyes-Becerri et al. (2013) demonstrated that dietary lyophilized Navicula sp. caused a higher expression of IL8 and IL1β than a silage diet in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) intestine. Nevertheless, the details in these studies about how the microalgae diets elevate pro-inflammatory factors are undefined. Similarly in our study, IL8 and IL1β possessed a higher expression in the Czof15% group than in the bloodworm diet group. Strangely, the gene for the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL10, whose product shows an opposite effect to the pro-inflammatory factor, exhibited higher expression in the Czof15% group, which needs to be clarified in future research. These results suggest that different bioactive molecules contained in microalgae exert anti-inflammatory function through a variety of mechanisms (Tabarzad et al. 2020).
Microalgae dietary supplementation improved the resistance to infection by V. anguillarum
When the pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMP) are recognized by TLRs, cellular signaling cascades can be activated through MyD88-dependent pathways that lead to the production of inflammatory cytokines (Rauta et al. 2014). TLRs can activate MyD88, and the downstream cascade is triggered and activated by related kinases. Finally, the signal is transmitted to the nucleus through NF-κB nuclear translocation to initiate an inflammatory response. The transcription factor NF-κB exists in almost all the animal cell types and plays a vital role in inflammatory signaling pathways, regulating the immune response to infection. It controls the expression of various cytokines, such as IL1β, IL6, IL8, and TNFα (Kong et al. 2021).
Our previous study has reported that up-regulation of TLR5 triggers the MyD88-dependent signaling pathway after bath-vaccination of a live attenuated V. anguilarum vaccine (Liu et al. 2014). In this study, the expression discrepancy trend of TLR5 and MyD88 was consistent, verifying that V. anguillarum MVM425 stimulated the immune response through the signal transmission pathway mediated by the coupling of TLR5 and MyD88. TLR5 binds to bacterial flagellin, activates signal transduction through NF-κB, and triggers the innate immune response to invading pathogens (Yoon et al. 2012). Meanwhile, it was reported that the gene expressions of IL1β and IL8 were increased significantly within 12 h after V. anguillarum MVAV6203 vaccination (Liu et al. 2014). As is known, IL1β is a major initiator of inflammatory and immune responses, and IL8 facilitates migration of neutrophils in pathogen resistance (Oehlers et al. 2010). In this work, we detected the expressions of these cytokines at 12 h post infection with V. anguillarum MVM425, and the expressions of these cytokines showed varying degrees of decline in most microalgae diet groups compared to the bloodworm diet group.
Bravo-Tello et al. (2017) evaluated the effects of five microalgae on zebrafish, including Tetraselmis sp., P. tricornutum, Chlorella sp., N. oculata, and N. gaditana, as additives in a soybean meal-based diet, to be specific, on intestinal inflammation and survival after Edwardsiella tarda infection. The study showed that all microalgae reduced intestinal inflammation triggered by the soybean meal, and only Tetraselmis sp. and Chlorella sp. diets decreased the mortality of larval fish against bacterial infection. This appears to be supported by an increase in neutrophils. Nayak et al. (2018) reported that dietary supplementation with the ω6 LC-PUFA-rich microalga L. incisa improved the zebrafish’s resistance to Streptococcus iniae infection, due to the balance between n-3 and n-6 LC-PUFA in sustaining the inflammatory homeostasis. DHA and EPA have been found to inhibit NF-κB from reducing the gene expression of cytokines in macrophages (Gutiérrez et al. 2019; Mendivil 2021). It is demonstrated that the antibacterial efficacy of DHA is the highest among long-chain PUFAs (Desbois and Lawlor 2013). Schizochytrium sp. is a fast-growing thraustochytrid microalga rich in DHA (Sprague et al. 2015). In our study, DHA was detected in the Schi15% group but not in the other groups. The lower gene expression of inflammatory factors in this group compared to the bloodworm group might be attributed to DHA. Similarly, it has been reported that when tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) was intraperitoneally injected with DHA, the gene expressions of IL1β, IL6, IL8, and TNFα were significantly down-regulated 12 h after the fish was infected by Vibrio vulnificus (Pan et al. 2017).
In rats, it was found that S. platensis had anti-inflammatory effects on acetic acid-induced experimental colitis (Tabarzad et al. 2020). Similar results were shown in our experiments. The cytokines and chemokines of the Spla15% and Dsal15% groups as well as the Schi15% and Czof15% groups maintained similar levels or lower levels with those of the ordinary feed group. Mucosal immune cells such as macrophages, lymphocytes, and granulocytes are distributed in the epithelium and lamina propria, and play a crucial role in the defense system of the intestinal mucosal surface (Lazado and Caipang 2014). Neutrophils are the first type of leukocytes to arrive at infection sites and display potent microbicidal functions. Therefore, they have classically been viewed as the first line of defense (Rosales 2020). In our study, compared with the bloodworm feed group, the gene expression of neutrophil marker b7r in the Csor15% group was increased, which indicates that it was activated after infection. Subsequently, it promoted the expression of TNFα and CCL20, improving the disease resistance of zebrafish.
We compared the relative expression of intestinal immune genes before and after V. anguillarum infection by the 2−ΔCT method as shown in the Fig. S2 (Online Resource 1). It was interestingly found that, before the infection, IL8 and IL1β expressions were at a lower level in the remaining microalgae diet groups compared to the red worm dry diet group. In contrast, after bacterial infection, NF-κB, IL1β, IL8, TNFα, etc. were all obviously promoted in expression. Physiologically, this is explained by the fact that these pro-inflammatory factors are expressed at low levels in the normal physiological state of the body to avoid inflammation and this mechanism appears to be more beneficial to health. Once infection occurs, the host rapidly produces inflammatory factors that activate the immune response, suppressing the exacerbation of infection. This conclusion can be imprinted by our experiment that the microalgae diets modulated the immune function of zebrafish and improved the resistance to infection by V. anguillarum.
Microalgae diets modulate gut health through alternating gut microbiota
The composition of the gut microbiota is closely associated with host immune health and plays a crucial role in maintaining host innate immune balance (Gómez and Balcázar 2008). Microalgae diet could regulate the abundance and homeostasis of probiotic and harmful bacteria, and plays a positive effect on the health of zebrafish. Cetobacterium is the most common bacterium found in the gut of freshwater fish (Ramirez et al. 2018; Sugita et al. 1991). Since Cetobacterium can produce vitamin B12 with high efficiency, it can supply vitamin B12, which is necessary for the physiological activities in freshwater fish (Tsuchiya et al. 2008). In our study, all of the microalgae diets increased the abundance of Cetobacterium compared with the bloodworm diet, especially in the Spla15% group (p < 0.05). Thus, the microalgae diets might exhibit probiotic properties, modifying the microbiota composition and improving fish health.
The metabolites of the intestinal bacteria, which were derived from dietary lipids, could be utilized as bioactive modulators for the host health and disease. For example, Stenotrophomonas could metabolize linoleic acid into hydroxy fatty acids (i.e., 10-hydroxy-cis-12-octadecenoic acid (HYA))—decreasing the expression of surface receptor associated with intestinal epithelial cells, and thereby preventing the receptor-mediated inflammation and protecting the epithelium (Nagatake and Kunisawa 2019; Saika et al. 2019). Our experiment showed that the abundance of this genus was higher in the Schi15% group than in the other groups (p < 0.05). A low inflammatory level consistently exhibited in this group, which might have a certain correlation with this genus.
The abundance of Chitinibacter was reduced in the microalgae diet groups. However, there are few studies on the association between Chitinibacter and host intestinal health. Chitinibacter could secrete chitinase-a key enzyme to digest chitin in crustaceans and is closely related to the growth and immune function of crustaceans (Niu et al. 2018). Perhaps the lack of chitin in our diets has reduced the abundance of this probiotic.
Mycoplasma was considered as a member of the phylum Firmicutes (Davis et al. 2013). It is a common inhabitant in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) intestines with insect-based diets. As a result of a long-established symbiosis, this microbe benefits from gut fermentable substrates and the host benefits from the lactic and acetic acid produced by bacterial fermentations (Rimoldi et al. 2019). However, there has been reported that Mycoplasma is potentially pathogenic and can lead to intestinal lesions and even tumorigenesis in zebrafish (Burns et al. 2018; Huyben et al. 2020; Kent et al. 2021). Shi et al. (2021) reported that diet supplemented with Schizochytrium sp. could reduce the abundance of harmful pathogen Mycoplasma in the zebrafish intestine. Interestingly, our experiments showed that the bloodworm diet accounted for the highest abundance of Mycoplasma in the intestinal tract. Meanwhile, the abundance of Mycoplasma decreased in the Schi15% group, as well as in the other microalgae diet groups, indicating that all tested microalgae diets improve zebrafish health.
Vibriosis is one of the most prevalent bacterial diseases affecting diverse aquatic animals (Ina-Salwany et al. 2019). It was reported that intestinal Vibrio spp. could increase the expression level of MyD88 and TLR signaling pathway genes in the conventionally reared zebrafish (Xin et al. 2020). Furthermore, the abundance of Vibrio in the Schi15%, Spla15%, and Csor15% groups decreased. Coincidentally, the gene expressions of TLR2, TLR4, and MyD88 decreased or remained unchanged in these groups. Therefore, Vibrio might be associated with these gene expressions. Similarly, Zhang et al. (2020b) indicated that the Vibrio community was positively correlated with TNFα and IL1β of the koi carp (Cyprinus carpio) intestine, and dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil decreased the Vibrio community. Fish might have a mutualistic relationship with V. cholera (Halpern and Izhaki 2017), but the stakes between this pathogen and fish need to be carefully discussed.
Shewanella is an opportunistic pathogen for fish that is widespread in the aquatic environment (Jung-Schroers et al. 2018). Species of Shewanella collected from freshwater fish were genetically diverse (Pazdzior et al. 2019). Commensalism of several Shewanella species played a beneficial role in improving the host gut health (Camara-Ruiz et al. 2020; Cordero et al. 2015; Hao et al. 2017; Wei et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2020a). However, the number of pathogenic bacteria in this genus is unknown. The abundance of Shewanella in our study was decreased in all microalgae diet groups. It might be explained that the microalgae diets could reduce the abundance of opportunistic pathogenic Shewanella sp.
Anyway, further elucidation of the microalgae diet-microbiota-host health interactive link is still needed in future. In addition, with the development of genetic engineering technology of many algal species, algal cells are modified to produce new bioactive substances, such as vaccines, antimicrobial peptides, and growth hormone (Charoonnart et al. 2018; Fajardo et al. 2019), providing the feasibility of functional algae feed for the aquatic industry.
In this study, we found that dietary supplemented with Schizochytrium sp., S. platensis, C. sorokiniana, C. zofingiensisi, and D. salina could enhance zebrafish growth performance and immune status. Microalgae diets possessed a positive effect on resistance to V. anguillarium infection, suggesting that such a nutritional replacement can be an efficient approach to improve the immune status and resistance to bacterial infection in fish. In addition, dietary supplementation with microalgae could modulate the intestinal community, forming a new homeostasis of probiotics and harmful bacteria. In a nut shell, these microalgae can be used as high-quality aquatic feed additives and have broad application prospects in the aquaculture industry. Also, these microalgae could be appropriate candidates for development of an oral vaccine vector in the future.
Data availability
The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its supplementary materials. The sequencing raw data was deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database (accession: PRJNA759359).
References
Ávila-Román J, Talero E, de los Reyes C, García-Mauriño S, Motilva V (2018) Microalgae-derived oxylipins decrease inflammatory mediators by regulating the subcellular location of NFκB and PPAR-γ. Pharm Res 128:220-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2017.10.009
Bates JM, Mittge E, Kuhlman J, Baden KN, Cheesman SE, Guillemin K (2006) Distinct signals from the microbiota promote different aspects of zebrafish gut differentiation. Dev Biol 297(2):374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.006
Bito T, Okumura E, Fujishima M, Watanabe F (2020) Potential of Chlorella as a dietary supplement to promote human health. Nutrients 12(9):2524. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092524
Bravo-Tello K, Ehrenfeld N, Solis CJ, Ulloa PE, Hedrera M, Pizarro-Guajardo M, Paredes-Sabja D, Feijoo CG (2017) Effect of microalgae on intestinal inflammation triggered by soybean meal and bacterial infection in zebrafish. PLoS ONE 12(11):e0187696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187696
Brestoff JR, Artis D (2013) Commensal bacteria at the interface of host metabolism and the immune system. Nat Immunol 14(7):676–684. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2640
Burns AR, Watral V, Sichel S, Spagnoli S, Banse AV, Mittge E, Sharpton TJ, Guillemin K, Kent ML (2018) Transmission of a common intestinal neoplasm in zebrafish by cohabitation. J Fish Dis 41(4):569–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.12743
Camara-Ruiz M, Balebona MC, Morinigo MA, Esteban MA (2020) Probiotic Shewanella putrefaciens (SpPdp11) as a fish health modulator: a review. Microorganisms 8(12):1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8121990
Cerezuela R, Meseguer J, Esteban MÁ (2013) Effects of dietary inulin, Bacillus subtilis and microalgae on intestinal gene expression in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Fish Shellfish Immun 34(3):843–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2012.12.026
Cerezuela R, Fumanal M, Tapia-Paniagua ST, Meseguer J, Moriñigo MÁ, Esteban MÁ (2012) Histological alterations and microbial ecology of the intestine in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) fed dietary probiotics and microalgae. Cell Tissue Res 350(3):477–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-012-1495-4
Chao A (1984) Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J Stat 11(4):265–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/4615964
Chao A, Lee S (1992) Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. J Am Stat Assoc 87(417):210–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475194
Charoonnart P, Purton S, Saksmerprome V (2018) Applications of microalgal biotechnology for disease control in aquaculture. Biology (basel) 7(2):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology7020024
Christaki E, Bonos E, Giannenas I, Florou-Paneri P (2013) Functional properties of carotenoids originating from algae. J Sci Food Agr 93(1):5–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5902
Clements KD, Angert ER, Montgomery WL, Choat JH (2014) Intestinal microbiota in fishes: what’s known and what’s not. Mol Ecol 23(8):1891–1898. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12699
Cordero H, Guardiola FA, Tapia-Paniagua ST, Cuesta A, Meseguer J, Balebona MC, Morinigo MA, Esteban MA (2015) Modulation of immunity and gut microbiota after dietary administration of alginate encapsulated Shewanella putrefaciens Pdp11 to gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Fish Shellfish Immun 45(2):608–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2015.05.010
Davis JJ, Xia F, Overbeek RA, Olsen GJ (2013) Genomes of the class Erysipelotrichia clarify the firmicute origin of the class Mollicutes. Int J Syst Evol Micr 63(Pt7):2727–2741. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.048983-0
Desbois AP, Lawlor KC (2013) Antibacterial activity of long-lhain polyunsaturated fatty acids against Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus aureus. Mar Drugs 11(11):4544–4557. https://doi.org/10.3390/md11114544
Dhandayuthapani K, Malathy S, Mulla SI, Gupta SK (2021) An insight into the potential application of microalgae in pharmaceutical and nutraceutical production. In: Mandotra SK, Upadhyay AK, Ahluwalia AS (eds) Algae: multifarious applications for a sustainable world. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 135–179
Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Pt R, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
Fajardo C, Donato M, Carrasco R, MartínezRodríguez G, Mancera JM, Fernández-Acero FJ (2019) Advances and challenges in genetic engineering of microalgae. Rev Aquacult 12:365–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12322
Ferrazzano GF, Papa C, Pollio A, Ingenito A, Sangianantoni G, Cantile T (2020) Cyanobacteria and microalgae as sources of functional foods to improve human general and oral health. Molecules 25(21):5164. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25215164
Folch J, Lees M, Stanley GHS (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226(1):497–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64849-5
Furbeyre H, van Milgen J, Mener T, Gloaguen M, Labussière E (2017) Effects of dietary supplementation with freshwater microalgae on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and gut health in weaned piglets. Animal 11(2):183–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116001543
Furbeyre H, van Milgen J, Mener T, Gloaguen M, Labussière E (2018) Effects of oral supplementation with Spirulina and Chlorella on growth and digestive health in piglets around weaning. Animal 12(11):2264–2273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000125
Galindo-Villegas J (2016) Recent findings on vertebrate developmental immunity using the zebrafish model. Mol Immunol 69:106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2015.10.011
Gómez GD, Balcázar JL (2008) A review on the interactions between gut microbiota and innate immunity of fish. Fems Immunol Med Mic 52(2):145–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00343.x
Gutiérrez S, Svahn SL, Johansson ME (2019) Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on immune cells. Int J Mol Sci 20(20):5028. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20205028
Halpern M, Izhaki I (2017) Fish as hosts of Vibrio cholerae. Front Microbiol 8:282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00282
Hao K, Wu ZQ, Li DL, Yu XB, Wang GX, Ling F (2017) Effects of dietary administration of Shewanella xiamenensis A-1, Aeromonas veronii A-7, and Bacillus subtilis, single or combined, on the grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) intestinal microbiota. Probiotics Antimicro 9(4):386–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9269-7
Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54(2):427–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934352
Huyben D, Roehe BK, Bekaert M, Ruyter B, Glencross B (2020) Dietary lipid: protein ratio and n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids alters the gut microbiome of atlantic salmon under hypoxic and normoxic conditions. Front Microbiol 11:589898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.589898
Ina-Salwany MY, Al-Saari N, Mohamad A, Mursidi FA, Mohd-Aris A, Amal MNA, Kasai H, Mino S, Sawabe T, Zamri-Saad M (2019) Vibriosis in fish: a review on disease development and prevention. J Aquat Anim Health 31(2):3–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/aah.10045
Izsák J, Papp L (2000) A link between ecological diversity indices and measures of biodiversity. Ecol Model 130(1):151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00203-9
Jung-Schroers V, Jung A, Ryll M, Bauer J, Teitge F, Steinhagen D (2018) Methods for identification and differentiation of different Shewanella spp. isolates for diagnostic use. J Fish Dis 41(4):689–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.12772
Kelly C, Salinas I (2017) Under pressure: interactions between commensal microbiota and the teleost immune system. Front Immunol 8:559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00559
Kent ML, Wall ES, Sichel S, Watral V, Stagaman K, Sharpton TJ, Guillemin K (2021) Pseudocapillaria tomentosa, Mycoplasma spp., and intestinal lesions in experimentally infected zebrafish Danio rerio. Zebrafish 18(3):207–220. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2020.1955
Kong Y, Li M, Guo G, E., Yu L, Sun L, Yin Z, Li R, Chen X, Wang G, (2021) Effects of dietary curcumin inhibit deltamethrin-induced oxidative stress, inflammation and cell apoptosis in Channa argus via Nrf2 and NF-κB signaling pathways. Aquaculture 540:736744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736744
Lazado CC, Caipang CMA (2014) Mucosal immunity and probiotics in fish. Fish Shellfish Immun 39(1):78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2014.04.015
Lazado CC, Nayak S, Khozin-Goldberg I, Zilberg D (2019) The gut mucosal barrier of zebrafish (Danio rerio) responds to the time-restricted delivery of Lobosphaera incisa-enriched diets. Fish Shellfish Immun 89:368–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2019.04.012
Li X, Yu Y, Feng W, Yan Q, Gong Y (2012) Host species as a strong determinant of the intestinal microbiota of fish larvae. J Microbiol 50(1):29–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-012-1340-1
Lichtenthaler HK, Buschmann C (2001) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-Vis spectroscopy. Curr Protoc 1:F4.3.1-F4.3.8. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142913.faf0403s01
Liu X, Wu H, Chang X, Tang Y, Liu Q, Zhang Y (2014) Notable mucosal immune responses induced in the intestine of zebrafish (Danio rerio) bath-vaccinated with a live attenuated Vibrio anguillarum vaccine. Fish Shellfish Immun 40(1):99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2014.06.030
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25(4):402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
López Nadal A, Ikeda-Ohtsubo W, Sipkema D, Peggs D, McGurk C, Forlenza M, Wiegertjes GF, Brugman S (2020) Feed, microbiota, and gut immunity: using the zebrafish model to understand fish health. Front Immunol 11:114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00114
Ma K, Bao Q, Wu Y, Chen S, Zhao S, Wu H, Fan J (2020) Evaluation of microalgae as immunostimulants and recombinant vaccines for diseases prevention and control in aquaculture. Front Bioeng Biotech 8:590431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.590431
Martin SAM, Krol E (2017) Nutrigenomics and immune function in fish: new insights from omics technologies. Dev Comp Immunol 75:86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2017.02.024
Mendivil CO (2021) Dietary fish, fish nutrients, and immune function: a review. Front Nutr 7:617652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.617652
Nagatake T, Kunisawa J (2019) Emerging roles of metabolites of omega3 and omega6 essential fatty acids in the control of intestinal inflammation. Int Immunol 31(9):569–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxy086
Nayak S, Khozin-Goldberg I, Cohen G, Zilberg D (2018) Dietary supplementation with ω6 LC-PUFA-rich algae modulates zebrafish immune function and improves resistance to streptococcal infection. Front Immunol 9:1960. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01960
Nayak S, Al Ashhab A, Zilberg D, Khozin-Goldberg I (2020) Dietary supplementation with omega-6 LC-PUFA-rich microalgae regulates mucosal immune response and promotes microbial diversity in the zebrafish gut. Biology (basel) 9(6):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9060119
Nielsen SS (2017) Protein nitrogen determination. In: Nielsen SS (ed) Food analysis laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Springer, Cham, pp 131–135
Niu S, Yang L, Zuo H, Zheng J, Weng S, He J, Xu X (2018) A chitinase from pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei involved in immune regulation. Dev Comp Immunol 85:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2018.04.013
Oehlers SHB, Flores MV, Hall CJ, O’Toole R, Swift S, Crosier KE, Crosier PS (2010) Expression of zebrafish cxcl8 (interleukin-8) and its receptors during development and in response to immune stimulation. Dev Comp Immunol 34(3):352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2009.11.007
Pan C-Y, Liu Y-H, Gong H-Y, Chen J-Y (2017) Transcriptome analysis of the effect of polyunsaturated fatty acids against Vibrio vulnificus infection in Oreochromis niloticus. Fish Shellfish Immun 62:153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2017.01.018
Pazdzior E, Pekala-Safinska A, Wasyl D (2019) Genotypic diversity among Shewanella spp. collected from freshwater fish. J Fish Dis 42(5):677–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.12971
Pérez T, Balcázar JL, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Halaihel N, Vendrell D, de Blas I, Múzquiz JL (2010) Host–microbiota interactions within the fish intestinal ecosystem. Mucosal Immunol 3(4):355–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/mi.2010.12
Ramirez C, Coronado J, Silva A, Romero J (2018) Cetobacterium is a major component of the microbiome of giant amazonian fish (Arapaima gigas) in Ecuador. Animals (basel) 8(11):189. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8110189
Rauta PR, Samanta M, Dash HR, Nayak B, Das S (2014) Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in aquatic animals: signaling pathways, expressions and immune responses. Immunol Lett 158(1–2):14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2013.11.013
Reyes-Becerril M, Guardiola F, Rojas M, Ascencio-Valle F, Esteban MÁ (2013) Dietary administration of microalgae Navicula sp. affects immune status and gene expression of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Fish Shellfish Immun 35(3):883–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2013.06.026
Rimoldi S, Gini E, Iannini F, Gasco L, Terova G (2019) The effects of dietary insect meal from Hermetia illucens prepupae on autochthonous gut microbiota of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Animals (basel) 9(4):143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040143
Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahe F (2016) VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4:e2584. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2584
Rosales C (2020) Neutrophils at the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity. J Leukocyte Biol 108(1):377–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlb.4mir0220-574rr
Saika A, Nagatake T, Kunisawa J (2019) Host- and microbe-dependent dietary lipid metabolism in the control of allergy, inflammation, and immunity. Front Nutr 6:36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00036
Salinas I, Parra D (2015) Fish mucosal immunity: intestine. In: Beck BH, Peatman E (eds) Mucosal health in aquaculture. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 135–170
Shah MR, Lutzu GA, Alam A, Sarker P, Kabir Chowdhury MA, Parsaeimehr A, Liang Y, Daroch M (2018) Microalgae in aquafeeds for a sustainable aquaculture industry. J Appl Phycol 30:197–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1234-z
Shi Y, Cao X, Ye Z, Xu Y, Wang Y, Li Z, Hang W, He N (2021) Role of dietary Schizochytrium sp. in improving disease resistance of zebrafish through metabolic and microbial analysis. Aquaculture 539:736631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736631
Sprague M, Walton J, Campbell PJ, Strachan F, Dick JR, Bell JG (2015) Replacement of fish oil with a DHA-rich algal meal derived from Schizochytrium sp. on the fatty acid and persistent organic pollutant levels in diets and flesh of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar, L.) post-smolts. Food Chem 185:413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.150
Sugita H, Miyajima C, Deguchi Y (1991) The vitamin B12-producing ability of the intestinal microflora of freshwater fish. Aquaculture 92:267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(91)90028-6
Tabarzad M, Atabaki V, Hosseinabadi T (2020) Anti-inflammatory activity of bioactive compounds from microalgae and cyanobacteria by focusing on the mechanisms of action. Mol Biol Rep 47(8):6193–6205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05562-9
Talero E, García-Mauriño S, Ávila-Román J, Rodríguez-Luna A, Alcaide A, Motilva V (2015) Bioactive compounds isolated from microalgae in chronic inflammation and cancer. Mar Drugs 13(10):6152–6209. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13106152
Tsuchiya C, Sakata T, Sugita H (2008) Novel ecological niche of Cetobacterium somerae, an anaerobic bacterium in the intestinal tracts of freshwater fish. Lett Appl Microbiol 46(1):43–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02258.x
Volff JN (2005) Genome evolution and biodiversity in teleost fish. Heredity 94(3):280–294. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800635
Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(16):5261–5267. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00062-07
Wei C, Wang X, Li C, Zhou H, Liu C, Mai K, He G (2021) Effects of dietary Shewanella sp. MR-7 on the growth performance, immunity, and intestinal microbiota of Pacific white shrimp. Aquacult Rep 19:100595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100595
Wittamer V, Bertrand JY, Gutschow PW, Traver D (2011) Characterization of the mononuclear phagocyte system in zebrafish. Blood 117(26):7126–7135. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-11-321448
Xiao Y, Liu Q, Chen H, Zhang Y (2011) A stable plasmid system for heterologous antigen expression in attenuated Vibrio anguillarum. Vaccine 29(40):6986–6993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.036
Xin GY, Li WG, Suman TY, Jia PP, Ma YB, Pei DS (2020) Gut bacteria Vibrio sp. and Aeromonas sp. trigger the expression levels of proinflammatory cytokine: first evidence from the germ-free zebrafish. Fish Shellfish Immun 106:518–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.08.018
Xiong J-B, Nie L, Chen J (2019) Current understanding on the roles of gut microbiota in fish disease and immunity. Zool Res 40(2):70–76. https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.069
Yaakob Z, Ali E, Zainal A, Mohamad M, Takriff MS (2014) An overview: biomolecules from microalgae for animal feed and aquaculture. J Biol Res-Thessalon 21(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2241-5793-21-6
Yarnold J, Karan H, Oey M, Hankamer B (2019) Microalgal aquafeeds as part of a circular bioeconomy. Trends Plant Sci 24(10):959–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.06.005
Yilmaz P, Parfrey LW, Yarza P, Gerken J, Pruesse E, Quast C, Schweer T, Peplies J, Ludwig W, Glöckner FO (2014) The SILVA and "all-species living tree project (LTP)'" taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res 42(Database issue):643–648. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1209
Yoon S-i, Kurnasov O, Natarajan V, Hong M, Gudkov AV, Osterman AL, Wilson IA (2012) Structural basis of TLR5-flagellin recognition and signaling. Science 335(6070):859–864. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215584
Yu Y, Wang Q, Huang Z, Ding L, Xu Z (2020) Immunoglobulins, mucosal immunity and vaccination in teleost fish. Front Immunol 11:567941. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.567941
Zhang B, Li C, Wang X, Liu C, Zhou H, Mai K, He G (2020a) Administration of commensal Shewanella sp. MR-7 ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced intestine dysfunction in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Fish Shellfish Immun 102:460-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.04.068
Zhang R, Wang XW, Liu LL, Cao YC, Zhu H (2020b) Dietary oregano essential oil improved the immune response, activity of digestive enzymes, and intestinal microbiota of the koi carp, Cyprinus carpio. Aquaculture 518:734781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734781
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872608), National Key Research and Development Project of China (2019YFA0906300 and 2020YFA0907304), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2019ZD17), Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1416400), and Funding Project of the State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JF, HW, and KM conceived and designed the research. KM, SC, YW, and YM conducted the experiments. KM and YM analyzed the data. KM wrote the manuscript. YM and HC revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.Declarations.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, K., Chen, S., Wu, Y. et al. Dietary supplementation with microalgae enhances the zebrafish growth performance by modulating immune status and gut microbiota. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 106, 773–788 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11751-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11751-8