Abstract
Natural products are an important source of modern medical development, e.g., antibiotics, anticancers, immune modulators, etc. and will continue to be a powerful driving force for the discovery of novel potential drugs. In the heterologous hosts, natural products are biosynthesized using dedicated metabolic networks. By gene engineering, pathway reconstructing, and enzyme engineering, metabolic networks can be modified to synthesize novel compounds containing enhanced structural feature or produce a large quantity of known valuable bioactive compounds. The review introduces some important technical platforms and relevant examples of genetic regulation and manipulation to improve natural product titers or drive novel secondary metabolite discoveries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Natural products are a rich source of bioactive compounds with hopefully therapeutic potential. They include compounds from plants, bacteria and fungi, as well as synthetic or semi-synthetic compounds based on natural products. This is widely accepted to be true that natural products had become a dominated drug discovery and development pathway since broadly use and research of penicillin after the Second World War (Li and Vederas 2009). According to statistics, by 1990, more than 80 % of the drugs on offer were either natural products or relative analogs or derivatives (Harvey 2008). It is, however, still true that the figure has been on the wane in more recent years due to the use of combinational chemistry for synthesizing some new drug entities/leads or novel structures and skeletons with therapeutic potential (Newman 2008). Natural products based drugs in the clinical studies fell by about 30 % from 2001 to 2008 (Li and Vederas 2009). Only 13 drugs from natural products and derivatives were on worldwide sales between 2005 and 2007 (Hong 2011). Nevertheless, this is likely to be temporary, as natural products from living organisms have complex structures with a large number of oxygen-containing substituents and an abundance of centers of stereochemistry, the potential for new drug discoveries in the longer term is enormous (Chillar et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2015b). All natural products, also referred to be secondary metabolites, appear to have no explicit role for the organism’s normal growth, development, and reproduction (Vaishnav and Demain 2011). However, they are important sources of modern medical development. For instance, antibiotics had been successfully used in the treatment of tumors, cardiovascular diseases, infectious diseases, and immune diseases ((Davies and Davies 2010).
The research of natural products is a labor and resource intensive work. Genetic regulation and manipulation has emerged in the past decade as a single field aiming to ramp up production of desirable natural products or produce valuable substances by continuous mutation and screening (Stephanopoulos 2012). The method has made the discovery of natural products win a new vitality. The most typical example is penicillin, the first anti-infective. By intensive screening and mutation using fungus, the level of production of penicillin used in industry is estimated to 100,000-fold higher yield, compared to its earliest discovered strain (Rokem et al. 2007). However, with the advent and application of new experimental tools and biotechnologies, metabolic networks, including some native and nonnatural biosynthetic routes, can be directly modified to synthesize various products (Stephanopoulos 2012). The progress of genetic engineering and enzyme engineering, development of synthetic biology, and more and more knowledge of metabolic engineering have greatly improved our ability to modify various complex metabolic networks. The dramatically reduced cost of genome sequencing technology, especially high-throughput sequencing and DNA microarrays, has made tens of thousands of available genomic data and generated a massive number of gene annotations involved in whole natural product pathways. Synthetic biology and genetic engineering have been developed for modifying and assembling some important living organisms and can be also used to guide metabolic network control, such as blocking competing pathways, increasing precursor and cofactor supply (Pickens et al. 2011), activating silent gene cluster (Rutledge and Challis 2015), or overexpression of pathway-specific regulator (Otero et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2015a). Furthermore, a dazzling array of biosynthetic enzymes is also very important for making a wide array of valuable natural products. These enzymes can be used to catalyze biological active molecules, aided by technological development in enzyme engineering. Researchers may freely construct enzymes with higher activities, stabilities, and specificities as ideal biocatalysts to produce massive numbers of the natural products and its derivatives (Zabala et al. 2012). By the use of these new tools and techniques, the metabolic networks of natural products can be used to synthesize structurally diverse metabolites, facilitate the yield improvement of the target compounds, and generate bioactive compounds with enhanced biological features, which are impractical using traditional organic synthetic methods. The mini review will highlight some concrete strategies to realize these goals.
Gene disruption and pathway reconstruction in heterologous hosts
One of the most efficient production methods for structural diversification is to delete an active gene that usually acts downstream of the whole metabolic pathway. A classic example (Fig. 1) is that the first designer novel polyene, 4, 5-deepoxypimaricin, was synthesized in Streptomyces natalensis by disruption of the downstream targeted gene pimD, which was responsible for encoding a cytochrome P450 epoxidase to convert 4, 5-deepoxypimaricin into pimaricin (Mendes et al. 2001). The inactivation of a ketoreductase (KR) mtmW gene located at the downstream of the whole mithramycin PKS genes led to the generation of three new mithramycin analogs, including mithramycin SK (MTM-SK) (Fig. 4), which showed better therapeutic index in the human tumor cell lines than its parent drug, mithramycin (Remsing et al. 2003). Some recent examples have also demonstrated that the downstream targeted gene disruption can generate new “unnatural” compounds. The inactivation of ttmM in tautomycin biosynthesis and ptmQ in pactamycin biosynthesis generates three tautomycin analogs (Ju et al. 2009) and two pactamycin analogs (Ito et al. 2009), respectively (Fig. 4). According to the understanding of the quinone biosynthetic pathway for ansamycin polyketides, Zhang MQ et al. (Zhang et al. 2008) used this approach to inactivate the gene of monooxygenase responsible, the mutant was created to produce a novel nonquinone macbecin compound (Fig. 4), which had 80-fold improved binding affinity to Hsp90 and significantly reduced toxicity.
Another major strategy is to create genome-minimized hosts for heterologous expression of secondary metabolism. The strategy is that by making systematically deletion for nonessential genes, one can utilize more primary metabolic building blocks, reducing equivalents as well as energy to produce desired secondary metabolites. Komatsu M et al. (Komatsu et al. 2010) recently reported that a wild-type Streptomyces avermitilis was systematically deleted to remove 83 % of nonessential genes, and upon introduction of the streptomycin biosynthesis gene cluster, the streptomycin productivity of the genome-minimized Streptomyces host was higher than that of the wild-type streptomycin producer S. griseus and the parent S. avermitilis carrying the streptomycin biosynthesis gene cluster. Furthermore, these genome-minimized mutants have also been confirmed to produce more than 20 novel bioactive compounds including polyketides (PKs), nonribosomal peptides (NRPs), and terpenes by heterologous expression (Ikeda et al. 2014). Except for directly act on S. avermitilis hosts, gene deletion has been also widely used to make succedaneous cell networks more high-efficient for the production of primary secondary metabolites. Chemler JA et al. (Chemler et al. 2010) constructed a genotype specifically engineered for improving the overall NADPH level and [NADPH]/[NADP+] ratio for the purpose of increasing the biosynthesis of natural products in Escherichia coli. Through experimentally validated model and stoichiometric-based model, the researchers found Δpgi, Δppc, and ΔpldA gene deletion can increasingly improve NADPH yield and availability and [NADPH]/[NADP+] ratio. Both of the flavonoid leucocyanidin and (+) catechin yields were also increased by a 4-fold and 2-fold, respectively, compared to the original strain. Although a mass of engineered mutants constructed here show enormous success not only for yield improvement of bioactive natural products but also for the biosynthesis of unnatural compounds, there are still a lot of knowledge about genes and cells that we are not familiar or cannot understand, and gene disruption may result in unintended results.
Rationally designing and assembling genes from metabolic networks in the succedaneous hosts
In many organisms, the original producing hosts of natural products are not optimal hosts because of their commercially unfeasible or genetically intractable. Hence, the development of succedaneous hosts, implemented for the rationally genetic manipulations and assembling of metabolic pathways, is of high interest (Pickens et al. 2011). This plug and play system will assemble biosynthetic genes from different pathways to reconstruct a functional pathway, assisting in analysis studies of biosynthesis, improving the yield of objective compounds, or facilitating manipulation of metabolic networks to synthesize novel, more bioactive or less toxic products. E. coli is widely used succedaneous host due to much simpler metabolic networks and easier for performing gene reconstruction. 6-Deoxyerythronolide B (6-dEB), the precursor of the antibiotic erythromycin, is a very successful example, which was synthesized in E. coli after plasmids were reengineered to incorporate DEBS1, DEBS2, DEBS3, sfp PPTase, pccA, and pccB genes from Streptomyces coelicolor (Fig. 2). The resulting strain produced 0.1 mmol of 6-dEB in the 1 g cellular protein per day (Pfeifer et al. 2001). Subsequently, the potent antibiotic erythromycin C (Ery C) was completely synthesized in E. coli by constructing two artificial operons using the megalomicin gene clusters, L-mycarose, and D-desosamine, to convert 6-dEB to Ery C (Peirú et al. 2005). Taxol is an important anticancer drug only isolated from the Taxus. Hence, the production of Taxol and its analogs is extremely limited. Ajikumar et al. (Ajikumar et al. 2010) used multivariate-modular approach to construct a metabolic network in E. coli and succeeded in increasing titers of taxadiene, a taxol intermediate—approximately 15,000-fold. The success helped us to unlock a new more efficient route to terpenoid biosynthesis for commercial production of microbially derived terpenoids. Using E. coli as a flexible platform, the echinomycin pathway was rationally assembled to produce an unnatural nonribosomal peptide, TANDEM (3) (Fig. 4) in E. coli, which was a synthetic triostin A analog and showed a more potent antibiotic activity than its parent compound (Watanabe et al. 2009a). Furthermore, some other pharmaceutically important compounds had been also successfully biosynthesized in E. coli, such as the potential anticancer agents epothilones C and D (Mutka et al. 2006), a new quinomycin antibiotic SW-163s (Watanabe et al. 2009b), the ginkgolide precursor levopimaradiene (Leonard et al. 2010), the chondroitin sulfates precursor chondroitin (He et al. 2014), and the gossypol precursor 8-hydroxycadinene (Chang et al. 2007).
Although E. coli is often used as a powerful host for heterologous expression and pathway reconstruction, especially for reconstructing polyketides of different types (Gao et al. 2010), alternative hosts are also very necessary if the metabolites are toxic or cannot be successfully expressed in E. coli. Streptomyces is a good candidate and have enormous advantages, due to owning to the metabolic networks necessary for some precursor molecules and resistant mechanisms, and successfully biosynthesized antibiotics. In 1985, researchers first transferred the genes related to the actinorhodin metabolic network in S. coelicolor into the medermycin and the granaticin synthesizing Streptomyces species. Two novel “hybrid” natural products, mederrhodin A and dihydrogranatirhodin (Fig. 4), were synthesized (Hopwood et al. 1985; Floss 1987). Similarly, genetically engineered Streptomyces strains (Li and Heide 2005) synthesized a mass of new hybrid aminocoumarins, novclobiocin 114 and 102, which would provide valuable insights into their inhibitory activity on gyrase in vitro and their antibacterial activity (Fig. 3). More recent examples showed the expression of modified synthetic gene clusters in Streptomyces roseosporus and Streptomyces fradiae generated novel analogs (Miao et al. 2005; Nguyen et al. 2006; Alexander et al. 2010). One of these compounds, CB-182561 (Fig. 4), had higher activity in the presence of bovine surfactant, lower toxicity, and could inhibit pulmonary infection of S. pneumoniae in the mouse model (Baltz 2010; Nguyen et al. 2010). Streptomyces was also used to unravel the biosynthetic network of metabolites and for the in vivo synthesis of relevant valuable antibiotics. Kanamycin is one of the most widely used aminoglycoside antibiotics, by the heterologous expression of integration of kanamycin biosynthetic gene cluster from Streptomyces kanamyceticus in Streptomyces venezuelae, Park et al. (Park et al. 2011) detailedly elucidated the biosynthetic network of kanamycins and applied the knowledge to directly synthesize 1-N-[S-4-amino-2-hydroxybutyric acid]-conjugated kanamycins in vivo. With the exception of expressing gene clusters coding for hybrid antibiotics, coumarins, nonribosomal peptides, aminoglycosides, and polyketides (Pfeifer and Khosla 2001), some peptides had been successfully expressed in Streptomyces, where the elongation factor thiazolyl peptide GE37468 and variants GE37468mhP8I and GE37468mhP8A (Fig. 4) had been produced in the engineered Streptomyces lividans (Young and Walsh 2011). Although genetic expression of heterologous Streptomyces is still in the early stages of development, these examples suggested that heterologous expression in Streptomyces is quite successful in dissecting biosynthetic steps and generating significant amounts of natural products and their analogs.
Furthermore, other alternative hosts were also being studied. Pichia was very excellent as a potential host for fungal polyketide biosynthesis. By introducing phosphopantetheinyl transferase gene npgA from Aspergillus nidulans and 6-methylsalicylic acid synthase gene atX from Aspergillus terrus, the recombinant Pichia pastoris GS115-NpgA-ATX had been successfully constructed to produce objective compound 6-methylsalicylic acid (6-MSA, Fig. 4). In the 5 L bioreactor, the recombinant can produce 2.2 g/L of 6-MSA by methanol induction for 20 h (Gao et al. 2013).
Activation of silent gene clusters
Over the past decade, the continuously increasing secondary metabolism gene clusters have been uncovered, indicating that they may become immense reservoirs of natural product discovery. However, most gene clusters are silent under laboratory conditions, presenting a huge bottleneck for natural product discovery. Thus, the activation of silent gene clusters, which is possibly responsible for natural products biosynthesis, will become a new direction of natural product discovery. To date, several methods based on genetic regulation and manipulation have been developed for the activation of the silent gene clusters. Zhou et al. (Zhou et al. 2015) successfully triggered the expression of a silent angucycline biosynthetic gene cluster (cha) by overexpressing a gene chal, encoding a putative pathway-specific activator in Streptomyces chattanoogensis L10. Two novel angucycline antibiotics with good anticancer activities, chattamycins A and B (Fig. 4), were obtained. In order to activate a putatively silent glycopeptide cluster which was not expressed under laboratory test conditions, a gene (bbr) encoding the transcriptional activator of balhimycin biosynthesis from Amycolatopsis balhimycina was introduced into Amycolatopsis japonicum (Spohn et al. 2014). This led to the production of an antibiotically active compound, ristomycin A (Fig. 4). A reporter-guided mutant selection was used to select for activated pga gene cluster, leading to the production of two novel anthraquinone aminoglycosides (Fig. 4), gaudimycin D and E (Guo et al. 2015). These findings show that activation of silent biosynthetic clusters is not only a feasible method to facilitate natural product discovery but also elaborates part of biosynthetic mechanism that is otherwise not easy to deduce.
It was also possible to manipulate inducible promoters (Rodríguez-García et al. 2005; Dangel et al. 2010) or wide-domain regulators (Rutledge and Challis 2015) to activate silent genes and influence the expression of secondary metabolites. Regretfully, these mechanisms underlying the activation were still unclear. Saleh et al. (Saleh et al. 2012) introduced a constitutive promoter ermE upstream of the phenazine biosynthesis genes into cosmid CB15 in recombinants; the silent phenazine biosynthetic gene cluster triggered the formation of a novel phenazine derivative. Deletion of a gene encoding N-acetyltransferase in A. nidulans led to the formation of unparalleled fungal metabolites, pheofungins (Scherlach et al. 2011). It may be because the missing N-acetylation of proteins causes fungal stress, leading to the activation of the pheofungin biosynthesis. Moreover, some regulatory mechanisms of biosynthesis are quite complicated and have not been also investigated at all. In order to determine which silent gene clusters are the most important for the production of natural products, bioinformatics analysis of the completely sequenced genome need be also investigated in advance (Zhou et al. 2015).
Rational design and directed evolution of biosynthetic enzymes
For over 20 years, the biosynthetic enzymes show a large potential in the biosynthesis of natural products (Bernhardt and O’connor 2009). However, few natural biosynthetic enzymes have high turnover and good expression. Many efforts are currently devoted to significantly alter substrate selectivity and specificity of biosynthetic enzymes (Zhang et al. 2013; Cacho and Tang 2013), enhance biosynthetic enzyme activity and stability (Urlacher and Girhard 2012), or redesign biosynthetic enzyme within scaffolds of known structure for titer improvement and natural product diversification (Huang et al. 2011). Wang et al. (Wang et al. 2011) used the avermectin reprogramming polyketide synthases (PKSs) in S. avermitilis M1 to produce the veterinary antiparasitic drug doramectin. In order to construct a strain that produced a mass of doramectin, isobutyryl-coenzyme A (CoA) loading module of the avermectin PKSs located in S. avermitilis M1 was replaced by the cyclohexanecarboxylic (CHC) unit from Spirulina platensis phoslactomycin PKSs (Fig. 5a). Doramectin production ability was increased about 6-fold, and the ratio of doramectin to avermectin was enhanced 300-folds compared to the original strain. In another case of rational design, recombined glycerol dehydratase appeared 3–5-folds more stable than the original strains by swapping the subunits of three GDHts in silico and was experimentally proved (Qi et al. 2006). The recent technological advances made biosynthetic enzyme functions become more clear and construction of complex biosynthetic enzymes from individual domains was becoming attainable. Liu et al. (Liu et al. 2011) reported that the unnatural product, 1, 4-naphthoquinone derivative of asperfuranone in A. nidulans was created by replacing NR-PKS AfoE asperfuranone biosynthesis SAT (starter unit ACP transacylase) domain with the NR-PKS StcA sterigmatocystin biosynthesis SAT domain (Fig. 5b) (Alekseeva et al. 2012; Wei et al. 2010). Fisch et al. (Fisch et al. 2011) also conducted rational domain swaps between the polyketide synthases and desmethylbassianin, leading to the regeneration of an extinct metabolite bassianin.
Directed evolution of biosynthetic enzymes has also enjoyed considerable success in the recent years; they are widely used in the discovery and development of natural products (Farinas et al. 2001). In recent work, using the pigmented carotenoid lycopene as a screening tool, directed evolution of biosynthetic enzymes was used for amplifying terpene precursor flux in an engineered strain to improve the production of terpenoid (Leonard et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2000). For natural product diversification, researchers performed a rational modulation at the STR (strictosidine synthase) binding pocket and a central enzyme of the alkaloid metabolic network, to selectively accommodate secologanin substrate analogs for alkaloid biosynthesis (Chen et al. 2006). The engineered enzymes were then transferred into Catharanthus roseus. The transgenic C. roseus plant root cell cultures incubate massive novel unnatural alkaloid compounds when feeding precursors. This also demonstrated the validity of directed enzyme evolution in mutasynthesis (Runguphan and O’Connor 2009). However, for modular PKSs and nonribosomal peptide synthases (NRPSs), simple functional domain swapping often leads to attenuated productivity (Nguyen et al. 2006; Hans et al. 2003). The problem can be 2-fold by (1) simple swapping of the functional domains in the hybrid module results in proteolytic susceptibility in vivo and/or intrinsic kinetic defects in the multidomain catalyst (Hans et al. 2003); (2) the downstream domains show absolute discrimination against the modified substrates, as exemplified via mutasynthesis to change the fourth module of rifamycin polyketide synthase (Hunziker et al. 1998). However, Fischbach and coworkers (Fischbach et al. 2007) demonstrated that multiple directed evolution and in vivo screens have restored the function of chimeric assembly line enzymes NRPSs replaced with a foreign A domain, the activity of the chimeric NRPSs product yield was increased by 10-fold, as well as the potent NRP/PK inhibitor andrimid analogs were also produced (Fig. 6). Some studies also suggest that semi-directed approaches: the combination of elements of directed enzyme design and some other methods is likely to yield positive results in the structure-based enzyme redesign (Lutz 2010). For example, mutation, modeling, the substrate walking approach in combine with rounds of directed enzyme evolution was used to reassemble Ω-transaminase from Arthrobacter sp. for the large scale manufacture of the antidiabetic compound sitagliptin (Savile et al. 2010).
Conclusions
As demonstrated by the authors in this review, the exploitation of metabolic networks often plays indispensable roles in the discovery and development of natural products. Significantly advances in genome mining, novel heterologous expression systems and enzyme engineering have allowed us to produce needed target compounds or unnatural compounds with enhanced biological features. Through genetic regulation and manipulation, some rarely structurally diverse metabolites from plants, bacteria, and fungi can also be synthesized in large qualities in the different hosts of genetic recombination. Although many experimental approaches that facilitate the improvement of metabolic networks, the production of new biologically active compounds and intermediates from natural products still face a variety of engineering challenges become of purification, identification, and biosynthesis issues. Therefore, we need to overcome these limitations by combining other tools, such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, fermentation optimization (Chen et al. 2009), redesign of metabolic flux, and some bioinformatic predicting tools.
Redesign of metabolic flux can divert flux into an appropriate pathway to accumulate former minor or unknown metabolites. There are several prominent examples describing the application, such as mevastatin and lovastatin (Manzoni and Rollini 2002), cyclosporine A (Survase et al. 2011), and a novel carbamoylated cephalosporin (Harris et al. 2009). Besides, some novel software tools are also being developed to support metabolic network research and redesign. GrowMatch method is often used to identify new genome-scale metabolic networks for getting more accurate and reliable reconstruction data (Kumar and Maranas 2009). The web-accessible tool of BioMet Toolbox is used to predict metabolic production rates, substrate consumption rates, and growth rates (Cvijovic et al. 2010). MeltDB and metaP-server software are applied to analyze metabolic flux based on metabolomics data during the network optimization in effort to solve toxic intermediates (Neuweger et al. 2008; Kastenmüller et al. 2010). In short, these approaches will be perhaps help us to produce a variety of useful active compound classes in the metabolic networks for meeting ever-increasing needs in human health and overall-being in the future.
References
Ajikumar PK, Xiao WH, Tyo KE, Wang Y, Simeon F, Leonard E, Mucha O, Phon TH, Pfeifer B, Stephanopoulos G (2010) Isoprenoid pathway optimization for taxol precursor overproduction in Escherichia coli. Science 330(6000):70–74. doi:10.1126/science.1191652
Alekseeva A, Savin S, Kleimenov SY, Uporov I, Pometun E, Tishkov V (2012) Stabilization of plant formate dehydrogenase by rational design. Biochemistry-Moscow 77(10):1199–1209. doi:10.1134/S0006297912100124
Alexander DC, Rock J, He X, Brian P, Miao V, Baltz RH (2010) Development of a genetic system for combinatorial biosynthesis of lipopeptides in Streptomyces fradiae and heterologous expression of the A54145 biosynthesis gene cluster. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(20):6877–6887. doi:10.1128/AEM.01248-10
Baltz RH (2010) Streptomyces and Saccharopolyspora hosts for heterologous expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters. J Ind Microbiol Biot 37(8):759–772. doi:10.1007/s10295-010-0730-9
Bernhardt P, O’connor SE (2009) Opportunities for enzyme engineering in natural product biosynthesis. Curr Opin Chem Biol 13(1):35–42. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.01.005
Cacho RA, Tang Y (2013) Bringing protein engineering and natural product biosynthesis together. Chem Biol 20(1):3–5. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.01.005
Chang MC, Eachus RA, Trieu W, Ro DK, Keasling JD (2007) Engineering Escherichia coli for production of functionalized terpenoids using plant P450s. Nat Chem Biol 3(5):274–277. doi:10.1038/nchembio875
Chemler JA, Fowler ZL, McHugh KP, Koffas MA (2010) Improving NADPH availability for natural product biosynthesis in Escherichia coli by metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 12(2):96–104. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2009.07.003
Chen S, Galan MC, Coltharp C, O’Connor SE (2006) Redesign of a central enzyme in alkaloid biosynthesis. Chem Biol 13(11):1137–1141. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.10.009
Chen JW, Li XL, Yin B, Liu GM, Wang K, Ping WX (2009) Statistical methods to optimize immobilization and bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus paracasei HD1. 7. Acta Microbiol Sin 49(5):664–671
Chen JW, Liao Y, Brandt BW, Zhu Y, Li J, Loveren CV, Deng DM (2015a) Identification and functional analysis of genome mutations in a fluoride-resistant Streptococcus mutans strain. PLoS one 10(4):1–13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122630
Chen JW, Wu QH, Rowley DC, Al-Kareef AM, Wang H (2015b) Anticancer agent-based marine natural products and related compounds. J Asian Nat Prod Res 17(2):199–216. doi:10.1080/10286020.2014.996140
Chillar AJ, Karimi P, Tang K, Ruan KH (2011) An agonist sensitive, quick and simple cell-based signaling assay for determination of ligands mimicking prostaglandin E2 or E1 activity through subtype EP1 receptor: suitable for high throughput screening. BMC Complement Altern Med 11(11):1–9. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-11-11
Cvijovic M, Olivares-Hernández R, Agren R, Dahr N, Vongsangnak W, Nookaew I, Patil KR, Nielsen J (2010) BioMet Toolbox: genome-wide analysis of metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res 38(suppl 2):144–149. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq404
Dangel V, Westrich L, Smith MC, Heide L, Gust B (2010) Use of an inducible promoter for antibiotic production in a heterologous host. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87(1):261–269. doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2435-4
Davies J, Davies D (2010) Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74(3):417–433. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00016-10
Farinas ET, Bulter T, Arnold FH (2001) Directed enzyme evolution. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12(6):545–551. doi:10.1016/S0958-1669(01)00261-0
Fisch KM, Bakeer W, Yakasai AA, Song Z, Pedrick J, Wasil Z, Bailey AM, Lazarus CM, Simpson TJ, Cox RJ (2011) Rational domain swaps decipher programming in fungal highly reducing polyketide synthases and resurrect an extinct metabolite. J Am Chem Soc 133(41):16635–16641. doi:10.1021/ja206914q
Fischbach MA, Lai JR, Roche ED, Walsh CT, Liu DR (2007) Directed evolution can rapidly improve the activity of chimeric assembly-line enzymes. P Natl Acad Sci 104(29):11951–11956. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705348104
Floss HG (1987) Hybrid antibiotics—the contribution of the new gene combinations. Trends Biotechnol 5(4):111–115. doi:10.1016/0167-7799(87)90030-8
Gao X, Wang P, Tang Y (2010) Engineered polyketide biosynthesis and biocatalysis in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biot 88(6):1233–1242. doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2860-4
Gao L, Cai M, Shen W, Xiao S, Zhou X, Zhang Y (2013) Engineered fungal polyketide biosynthesis in Pichia pastoris: a potential excellent host for polyketide production. Microb Cell Factories 12(1):77. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-12-77
Guo F, Xiang S, Li L, Wang B, Rajasärkkä J, Gröndahl-Yli-Hannuksela K, Ai G, Metsä-Ketelä M, Yang K (2015) Targeted activation of silent natural product biosynthesis pathways by reporter-guided mutant selection. Metab Eng 28:134–142. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2014.12.006
Hans M, Hornung A, Dziarnowski A, Cane DE, Khosla C (2003) Mechanistic analysis of acyl transferase domain exchange in polyketide synthase modules. J Am Chem Soc 125(18):5366–5374. doi:10.1021/ja029539i
Harris DM, Westerlaken I, Schipper D, Van der Krogt ZA, Gombert AK, Sutherland J, Raamsdonk LM, Van den Berg MA, Bovenberg RA, Pronk JT (2009) Engineering of Penicillium chrysogenum for fermentative production of a novel carbamoylated cephem antibiotic precursor. Metab Eng 11(2):125–137. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2008.12.003
Harvey AL (2008) Natural products in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 13(19): 894–901.doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2008.07.004
He W, Fu L, Li G, Jones JA, Linhardt RJ, Koffas M (2014) Production of chondroitin in metabolically engineered E. coli. Metab Eng 27:92–100. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2014.11.003
Hong J (2011) Role of natural product diversity in chemical biology. Curr Opin Chem Biol 15(3):350–354. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.03.004
Hopwood DA, Malpartida F, Kieser H, Ikeda H, Duncan J, Fujii I, Rudd B, Floss H (1985) Production of ‘hybrid’ antibiotics by genetic engineering. Nature 314(6012):642–644. doi:10.1038/314642a0
Huang X, Liu X, Luo Q, Liu J, Shen J (2011) Artificial selenoenzymes: designed and redesigned. Chem Soc Rev 40(3):1171–1184. doi:10.1039/C0CS00046A
Hunziker D, Yu TW, Hutchinson CR, Floss HG, Khosla C (1998) Primer unit specificity in rifamycin biosynthesis principally resides in the later stages of the biosynthetic pathway. J Am Chem Soc 120(5):1092–1093. doi:10.1021/ja9736368
Ikeda H, Shin-ya K, Omura S (2014) Genome mining of the Streptomyces avermitilis genome and development of genome-minimized hosts for heterologous expression of biosynthetic gene clusters. J Ind Microbiol Biot 41(2):233–250. doi:10.1007/s10295-013-1327-x
Ito T, Roongsawang N, Shirasaka N, Lu W, Flatt PM, Kasanah N, Miranda C, Mahmud T (2009) Deciphering pactamycin biosynthesis and engineered production of new pactamycin analogues. Chembiochem 10(13):2253–2265. doi:10.1002/cbic.200900339
Ju J, Li W, Yuan Q, Peters NR, Hoffmann FM, Rajski SR, Osada H, Shen B (2009) Functional characterization of ttmM unveils new tautomycin analogs and insight into tautomycin biosynthesis and activity. Org Lett 11(7):1639–1642. doi:10.1021/ol900293j
Kastenmüller G, Römisch-Margl W, Wägele B, Altmaier E, Suhre K (2010) metaP-server: a web-based metabolomics data analysis tool. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011:1–7. doi:10.1155/2011/839862
Komatsu M, Uchiyama T, Ōmura S, Cane DE, Ikeda H (2010) Genome-minimized Streptomyces host for the heterologous expression of secondary metabolism. P Natl Acad Sci 107(6):2646–2651. doi:10.1073/pnas.0914833107
Kumar VS, Maranas CD (2009) GrowMatch: an automated method for reconciling in silico/in vivo growth predictions. PLoS Comput Biol 5(3):1–13. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000308
Leonard E, Ajikumar PK, Thayer K, Xiao WH, Mo JD, Tidor B, Stephanopoulos G, Prather KL (2010) Combining metabolic and protein engineering of a terpenoid biosynthetic pathway for overproduction and selectivity control. P Natl Acad Sci 107(31):13654–13659. doi:10.1073/pnas.1006138107
Li SM, Heide L (2005) New aminocoumarin antibiotics from genetically engineered Streptomyces strains. Curr Med Chem 12(4):419–427. doi:10.2174/0929867053363063
Li JWH, Vederas JC (2009) Drug discovery and natural products: end of an era or an endless frontier? Science 325(5937):161–165. doi:10.1126/science.1168243
Liu T, Chiang YM, Somoza AD, Oakley BR, Wang CC (2011) Engineering of an “unnatural” natural product by swapping polyketide synthase domains in Aspergillus nidulans. J Am Chem Soc 133(34):13314–13316. doi:10.1021/ja205780g
Lutz S (2010) Beyond directed evolution—semi-rational protein engineering and design. Curr Opin Biotech 21(6):734–743. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.08.011
Manzoni M, Rollini M (2002) Biosynthesis and biotechnological production of statins by filamentous fungi and application of these cholesterol-lowering drugs. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58(5):555–564. doi:10.1007/s00253-002-0932-9
Mendes MV, Recio E, Fouces R, Luiten R, Martin JF, Aparicio JF (2001) Engineered biosynthesis of novel polyenes: a pimaricin derivative produced by targeted gene disruption in Streptomyces natalensis. Chem Biol 8(7):635–644. doi:10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00033-3
Miao V, Coëffet-LeGal MF, Brian P, Brost R, Penn J, Whiting A, Martin S, Ford R, Parr I, Bouchard M (2005) Daptomycin biosynthesis in Streptomyces roseosporus: cloning and analysis of the gene cluster and revision of peptide stereochemistry. Microbiol 151(5):1507–1523. doi:10.1099/mic.0.27757-0
Mutka SC, Carney JR, Liu Y, Kennedy J (2006) Heterologous production of epothilone C and D in Escherichia coli. Biochem 45(4):1321–1330. doi:10.1021/bi052075r
Neuweger H, Albaum SP, Dondrup M, Persicke M, Watt T, Niehaus K, Stoye J, Goesmann A (2008) MeltDB: a software platform for the analysis and integration of metabolomics experiment data. Bioinformatics 24(23):2726–2732. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn452
Newman DJ (2008) Natural products as leads to potential drugs: an old process or the new hope for drug discovery? J Med Chem 51(9):2589–2599. doi:10.1021/jm0704090
Nguyen KT, Ritz D, Gu JQ, Alexander D, Chu M, Miao V, Brian P, Baltz RH (2006) Combinatorial biosynthesis of novel antibiotics related to daptomycin. P Natl Acad Sci 103(46):17462–17467. doi:10.1073/pnas.0608589103
Nguyen KT, He X, Alexander DC, Li C, Gu JQ, Mascio C, Van Praagh A, Mortin L, Chu M, Silverman JA (2010) Genetically engineered lipopeptide antibiotics related to A54145 and daptomycin with improved properties. Antimicrob Agents Ch 54(4):1404–1413. doi:10.1128/AAC.01307-09
Otero J, Vongsangnak W, Asadollahi M, Olivares-Hernandes R, Maury J, Farinelli L, Barlocher L, Østerås M, Schalk M, Clark A (2010) Whole genome sequencing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: from genotype to phenotype for improved metabolic engineering applications. BMC Genomics 11(1):1–17. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-723
Park JW, Park SR, Nepal KK, Han AR, Ban YH, Yoo YJ, Kim EJ, Kim EM, Kim D, Sohng JK (2011) Discovery of parallel pathways of kanamycin biosynthesis allows antibiotic manipulation. Nat Chem Biol 7(11):843–852. doi:10.1038/nchembio.671
Peirú S, Menzella HG, Rodríguez E, Carney J, Gramajo H (2005) Production of the potent antibacterial polyketide erythromycin C in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microb 71(5):2539–2547. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.5.2539-2547.2005
Pfeifer BA, Khosla C (2001) Biosynthesis of polyketides in heterologous hosts. Microbiol Mol Biol R 65(1):106–118. doi:10.1128/MMBR.65.1.106-118.2001
Pfeifer BA, Admiraal SJ, Gramajo H, Cane DE, Khosla C (2001) Biosynthesis of complex polyketides in a metabolically engineered strain of E. coli. Science 291(5509):1790–1792. doi:10.1126/science.1058092
Pickens LB, Tang Y, Chooi YH (2011) Metabolic engineering for the production of natural products. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 2:211–236. doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114209
Qi X, Sun L, Luo Z, Wu J, Meng X, Tang Y, Wei Y, Huang R (2006) Rational design of glycerol dehydratase: swapping the genes encoding the subunits of glycerol dehydratase to improve enzymatic properties. Chinese Sci Bull 51(24):2977–2985. doi:10.1007/s11434-006-2219-5
Remsing LL, González AM, Nur-e-Alam M, Fernández-Lozano MJ, Braña AF, Rix U, Oliveira MA, Méndez C, Salas JA, Rohr J (2003) Mithramycin SK, a novel antitumor drug with improved therapeutic index, mithramycin SA, and demycarosyl-mithramycin SK: three new products generated in the mithramycin producer Streptomyces argillaceus through combinatorial biosynthesis. J Am Chem Soc 125(19):5745–5753. doi:10.1021/ja034162h
Rodríguez-García A, Combes P, Pérez-Redondo R, Smith MC, Smith MC (2005) Natural and synthetic tetracycline-inducible promoters for use in the antibiotic-producing bacteria Streptomyces. Nucleic Acids Res 33(9):e87–e87. doi:10.1093/nar/gni086
Rokem JS, Lantz AE, Nielsen J (2007) Systems biology of antibiotic production by microorganisms. Nat Prod Rep 24(6):1262–1287. doi:10.1039/B617765B
Runguphan W, O’Connor SE (2009) Metabolic reprogramming of periwinkle plant culture. Nat Chem Biol 5(3):151–153. doi:10.1038/nchembio.141
Rutledge PJ, Challis GL (2015) Discovery of microbial natural products by activation of silent biosynthetic gene clusters. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:509–523. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3496
Saleh O, Bonitz T, Flinspach K, Kulik A, Burkard N, Mühlenweg A, Vente A, Polnick S, Lämmerhofer M, Gust B (2012) Activation of a silent phenazine biosynthetic gene cluster reveals a novel natural product and a new resistance mechanism against phenazines. Medchemcomm 3(8):1009–1019. doi:10.1039/C2MD20045G
Savile CK, Janey JM, Mundorff EC, Moore JC, Tam S, Jarvis WR, Colbeck JC, Krebber A, Fleitz FJ, Brands J (2010) Biocatalytic asymmetric synthesis of chiral amines from ketones applied to sitagliptin manufacture. Science 329(5989):305–309. doi:10.1126/science.1188934
Scherlach K, Nutzmann HW, Schroeckh V, Dahse HM, Brakhage AA, Hertweck C (2011) Cytotoxic pheofungins from an engineered fungus impaired in posttranslational protein modification. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:9843–9847. doi:10.1002/anie.201104488
Spohn M, Kirchner N, Kulik A, Jochim A, Wolf F, Muenzer P, Borst O, Gross H, Wohlleben W, Stegmann E (2014) Overproduction of ristomycin A by activation of a silent gene cluster in Amycolatopsis japonicum MG417-CF17. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58(10):6185–6196. doi:10.1128/AAC.03512-14
Stephanopoulos G (2012) Synthetic biology and metabolic engineering. ACS Synth Biol 1(11):514–525. doi:10.1021/sb300094q
Survase SA, Kagliwal LD, Annapure US, Singhal RS (2011) Cyclosporin A—a review on fermentative production, downstream processing and pharmacological applications. Biotechnol Adv 29(4):418–435. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.03.004
Urlacher VB, Girhard M (2012) Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases: an update on perspectives for synthetic application. Trends Biotechnol 30(1):26–36. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.06.012
Vaishnav P, Demain AL (2011) Unexpected applications of secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv 29(2):223–229. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.11.006
Wang CW, Oh MK, Liao JC (2000) Directed evolution of metabolically engineered Escherichia coli for carotenoid production. Biotechnol Prog 16(6):922–926
Wang JB, Pan HX, Tang GL (2011) Production of doramectin by rational engineering of the avermectin biosynthetic pathway. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 21(11):3320–3323. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.04.008
Watanabe K, Hotta K, Nakaya M, Praseuth AP, Wang CC, Inada D, Takahashi K, Fukushi E, Oguri H, Oikawa H (2009a) Escherichia coli allows efficient modular incorporation of newly isolated quinomycin biosynthetic enzyme into echinomycin biosynthetic pathway for rational design and synthesis of potent antibiotic unnatural natural product. J Am Chem Soc 131(26):9347–9353. doi:10.1021/ja902261a
Watanabe K, Hotta K, Praseuth AP, Searcey M, Wang CC, Oguri H, Oikawa H (2009b) Rationally engineered total biosynthesis of a synthetic analogue of a natural quinomycin depsipeptide in Escherichia coli. Chembiochem 10(12):1965–1968. doi:10.1002/cbic.200900260
Wei J, Zhou Y, Xu T, Lu B (2010) Rational design of catechol-2, 3-dioxygenase for improving the enzyme characteristics. Appl Biochem Biotech 162(1):116–126. doi:10.1007/s12010-009-8720-y
Young TS, Walsh CT (2011) Identification of the thiazolyl peptide GE37468 gene cluster from Streptomyces ATCC 55365 and heterologous expression in Streptomyces lividans. P Natl Acad Sci 108(32):13053–13058. doi:10.1073/pnas.1110435108
Zabala AO, Cacho RA, Tang Y (2012) Protein engineering towards natural product synthesis and diversification. J Ind Microbiol Biot 39(2):227–241. doi:10.1007/s10295-011-1044-2
Zhang MQ, Gaisser S, Nur-E-Alam M, Sheehan LS, Vousden WA, Gaitatzis N, Peck G, Coates NJ, Moss SJ, Radzom M (2008) Optimizing natural products by biosynthetic engineering: discovery of nonquinone Hsp90 inhibitors. J Med Che 51(18):5494–5497. doi:10.1021/jm8006068
Zhang K, Nelson KM, Bhuripanyo K, Grimes KD, Zhao B, Aldrich CC, Yin J (2013) Engineering the substrate specificity of the DhbE adenylation domain by yeast cell surface display. Chem Biol 20(1):92–101. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.10.020
Zhou Z. Xu Q, Bu Q, Guo Y, Liu S, Liu Y, Du Y, Li Y (2015) Genome mining-directed activation of a silent angucycline biosynthetic gene cluster in Streptomyces chattanoogensis. Chembiochem 16 (3), 496–502. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2014.12.006
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by China Scholarship Council (CSC) (File No. 201408330156), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30973681), and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. LY13B020011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical standards
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Wu, Q., Hawas, U.W. et al. Genetic regulation and manipulation for natural product discovery. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100, 2953–2965 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7357-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7357-3