Abstract
Strategies for bioremediation of atrazine, a pesticide commonly polluting groundwater in low concentrations, were studied in two boreal nonagricultural soils. Atrazine was not mineralized in soil without bioremediation treatments. In biostimulation treatment with molasses, up to 52 % of atrazine was mineralized at 10 °C, even though the degradation gene copy numbers did not increase. Incubations with radioactively labeled atrazine followed by microautoradiographic analysis revealed that bioremediation strategies increased the relative proportion of active degraders from 0.3 up to 1.9 % of the total bacterial count. These results indicate that atrazine degradation might not solely be facilitated by atzA/trzN–atzB genes. In combined biostimulation treatment using citrate or molasses and augmentation with Pseudomonas citronellolis ADP or Arthrobacter aurescens strain TC1, up to 76 % of atrazine was mineralized at 30 °C, and the atrazine degradation gene numbers increased up to 107 copies g−1 soil. Clone libraries from passive samplers in groundwater monitoring wells revealed the presence of phylogenetic groups formerly shown to include atrazine degraders, and the presence of atrazine degradation genes atzA and atzB. These results show that the mineralization of low concentrations of atrazine in the groundwater zone at low temperatures is possible by bioremediation treatments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Intensive use of pesticides has increased the amount of accidental exposure of these harmful substances to the ecosystem. Although many soil bacteria have potential for pesticide biodegradation, several herbicides are frequently detected in soil and groundwater. Atrazine (1-chloro-3-ethylamino-5-isopropylamino-2,4,6-triazine) was banned by the European Union a decade ago due to its recalcitrance, but despite the concerns of environmental impacts and possible risks to human health, it is still one of the most widely used herbicide against broad leaf weeds worldwide today.
Although atrazine is a recalcitrant compound, it is susceptible to microbial degradation in topsoil (Aislabie et al. 2004; Nousiainen et al. 2014; Sagarkar et al. 2013; Sagarkar et al. 2014). Bacteria can degrade atrazine by two different pathways, initiated by dealkylation and dechlorination. The latter route is well described and catalyzed by the enzymes encoded by the atzABCDEF genes (de Souza et al., 1996). Instead of atzA, the functional homolog, trzN gene (Mulbry et al. 2002), may be more commonly observed in the environment (Arbeli and Fuentes 2010). An alternative atrazine degradation pathway, initiated by a dealkylation reaction, is carried out by a P-450 cytochrome system in certain strains of Rhodococcus species (Nagy et al. 1995). This reaction is not specific for triazine breakdown, and hence, the presence of this pathway cannot directly be linked with atrazine degradation by genomic tools.
High concentration of atrazine can be degraded in topsoil (Wang et al. 2013), but often, it partly leaches into the subsoil, where its degradation is considerably slower (Accinelli et al. 2001). Atrazine removal is economically and technically most difficult to achieve when it is present in subsoil and at low concentrations. Unfortunately, this is the most common type of atrazine pollution. A survey of pesticides in Finnish groundwater revealed atrazine concentrations up to 0.34 μg L−1 (Vuorimaa et al. 2007). Similar low values are common in groundwaters globally (Hallberg 1989; Jurado et al. 2012; Stuart et al. 2012). As the European Union has set the maximum limit for pesticides in drinking water to 0.1 μg L−1, even a trace amount of atrazine can cause the groundwater to be unfit for drinking water use. The majority of the studies related to atrazine degradation in subsoil are carried out using agricultural topsoil having high atrazine concentration (Li et al. 2008; Lima et al. 2009; Singh and Cameotra 2014), and little is known on atrazine degradation in nonagricultural subsoil where, despite the low concentrations, it potentially endangers groundwater reserves. Thus, research conducted on high atrazine concentrations may not be applicable in the bioremediation of atrazine in the groundwater zone.
The environmental impacts of herbicides are frequently assessed by evaluating their half-lives under standardized conditions. However, environmental conditions seldom resemble the laboratory conditions, and degradation can be reduced when the herbicide is used in the field (Bromilow et al. 1999). Atrazine is moderately soluble in water, and it therefore leaches into the groundwater, where its half-life can increase up to nine times (Blume et al. 2004). Pesticide degradation rates can be dramatically influenced by soil pH (Mueller et al., 2010), organic material (Cheyns et al. 2012), temperature (Kookana et al. 2010), and soil layer (Willems et al. 1996).
Finnish atrazine-contaminated subsoils are typically nonagricultural, often acidic, and low in organic carbon, and ambient temperatures are low. For these reasons, residual atrazine is still found in the groundwater decades after its use was discontinued (Vuorimaa et al. 2007). In bioremediation, the environmental conditions are modified to improve degradation. Because many bacteria use atrazine as a nitrogen source (Udiković-Kolić et al. 2012), the addition of carbon may enhance atrazine degradation in soils where the amount of available carbon, rather than nitrogen, is limiting growth. Several studies have shown that bioaugmentation with Pseudomonas citronellolis ADP harboring the atzABCDEF genes enhance atrazine degradation in topsoil (Chelinho et al. 2010; Lima et al. 2009). Bioaugmented P. citronellolis is capable of atrazine degradation at 12 °C (Monard et al. 2008), but no studies explored its exploitation in subsoil.
The purpose of this study was to investigate bioremediation in boreal subsoils contaminated with low concentrations of atrazine. The natural degradation potential of one of the soils used in this study has been previously described as low (Nousiainen et al. 2014). We tested the effects of temperature, atrazine concentration, carbon source, and bioaugmentation with atrazine-degrading microbial strains to enhance atrazine degradation in subsoil.
Materials and methods
Sampling
Soil was collected in two different sampling campaigns from two similar sites on the Salpausselkä ice-marginal formation, in Sveitsi natural park (SNP), Southern Finland (60° 38′ 18″ N, 24° 49′ 17″ E) on 15.09.2009, and in Lohjanharju (LOH), Southern Finland (60° 17′ 39″ N, 24° 12′ 46″ E) on 15.12.2011. Both sites were in a coniferous forest, adjacent to waterworks where atrazine and its degradation products had been observed in the raw groundwater. At both sites, the most likely source of atrazine pollution was from nonagricultural use of atrazine, e.g., on railroads.
Soil from site SNP was sandy or silty and had a low organic carbon content (<1 % dry weight). The groundwater level was very high, and the saturated layer was only 20 cm below surface. Saturated soil was collected from site SNP from 2 to 5 m for bioremediation experiments and from 50 cm for microautoradiography (MAR).
The soil from site LOH had similar characteristics as the soil from site SNP in regard to texture and carbon content. The groundwater level in the area was 4–6 m and varied depending on rainfall and season. The soil pore gas composition at the depth of 2.5 m was measured with a Dräger gas meter at site LOH, and the high O2 concentration (20.4–20.6 %) was found to indicate low microbial activity. Material for testing atrazine degradation for increased atrazine concentration was collected from site LOH from three different depths; bulk samples representing topsoil (1–2 m), unsaturated soil (2–5 m), and saturated soil (6–9 m). All soil samples were transported to the laboratory, sieved through an 8-mm sieve, and mixed well and packed in plastic buckets. Soils were stored at +4 °C in field moisture conditions until use (1 to 5 months). Samples for the determination of gene abundances in situ were frozen and stored at −20 °C.
Preparation of bacterial inocula
Atrazine-degrading strains, P. citronellolis strain ADP (DSM 11735) genotype atzA/atzB and Arthrobacter aurescens strain TC1 (ATCC BAA-1386) genotype trzN/atzB, were obtained from the culture collections ATCC and DSM, respectively. Prior to microcosm experiments, the bacteria were grown in liquid 0.1× Luria-Bertani (LB) medium amended with 0.5 mg L−1 atrazine at 30 °C, 200 rpm. Cells were harvested from overnight cultures by centrifugation and washed with 0.9 % NaCl. A turbid suspension in 0.9 % NaCl was prepared from both strains, and approximately 2 × 105 cells g−1 soil were used for bioaugmenting the microcosms.
Construction of microcosms and experimental setup
The atrazine mineralization potential of the autochthonous microbial community was tested by amending the soil with 1.2 mg kg−1 commercial atrazine (50 % active ingredient) product (SriZon, Crystal Phosphates, Delhi, India) to samples from three soil layers (topsoil, unsaturated, and saturated) of the LOH site in order to reach the concentration required for the detection by LC/MS/MS. One hundred seventy-five milliliters of the commercial atrazine was mixed with 3.5 kg of soil from each layer in three additions, mixing the soil thoroughly after each addition.
The effect of additional carbon (citrate or molasses) and/or atrazine-degrading bacteria on atrazine mineralization was tested in microcosms using soil samples from site SNP. The carbon sources were added in the microcosm treatments as a component of modified Cai medium (Cai et al. 2003). The carbon components added were an equal mass of carbon atoms in either sodium citrate (3 g L−1) or molasses (3.74 g L−1). Modified Cai medium was also prepared without any additional carbon amendment.
Atrazine mineralization by radiorespirometry
Atrazine mineralization was carried out by radiorespirometry as described elsewhere (Nousiainen et al., 2014) using 10 g of soil and modified Cai medium with or without carbon source, ring-labeled 14C atrazine [specific activity 160 mCi mmol−1; 99 % radiochemical purity (Larodan Fine Chemicals Ab, Sweden)] as tracer (6.25 × 10−10 mol g−1 soil (freshwater, fw)), or labeled and additional atrazine (0.006 mol g−1 soil (fw)) and/or bacteria according to Table 1. The Cai medium containing carbon source and tracer was added in the bottles in 500-μL volumes, drop by drop, while mixing the soil. All microcosms were carried out in triplicate. Negative controls were prepared by autoclaving the soil microcosms three times. Microcosms were incubated at 30 and 10 °C, 100 rpm for 115 days. The parameters of the mineralization kinetics were determined by fitting a modified Gompertz model (Zwietering et al. 1990) to the mineralization curves using Sigma Plot 4.0.
Chemical analysis of atrazine, HA, DIA, DEA, and DEDIA
Parallel samples containing 60 g of soil from Site LOH were set up for chemical analysis. The concentration of atrazine and its degradation products hydroxyatrazine (HA), desethylatrazine (DEA), deisopropylatrazine (DIA), and desethyl-deisopropylatrazine (DEDIA) in soil were examined at the beginning, middle (35 days for 30 °C incubations, 56 days for 10 °C incubations), and end of the experiment (56 days for 30 °C incubations, 112 days for 10 °C incubations) from 60 g of soil by Ramboll Analytics (Lahti, Finland) by gas–liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Acetone/hexane was used as the solvent to extract pesticides from soil.
Quantification of degradation genes by qPCR
Parallel samples for each mineralization bottle were prepared without the labeled atrazine for molecular analyses. Total DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of soil periodically during the course of the experiments by FastDNA Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, OH, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The number of degradation genes atzA, trzN, and atzB were quantified as described elsewhere (Nousiainen et al., 2014).
Estimation of active atrazine degraders by microautoradiography
The numbers of active atrazine-degrading microorganisms in native soil from site SNP, in soil amended with 1 g citrate kg−1 and in soil spiked with a turbid mixture of actively growing P. citronellolis and A. aurescens grown in mineral medium containing 100 mg L−1 atrazine, were investigated by microautoradiography (MAR) as described in details elsewhere (Nielsen and Nielsen, 2005) with minor modifications. Briefly, 1.0 g of soil was weighed into three 3-mL glass vials, and 20 μCi of 14C ring-labeled atrazine (specific activity of 160 mCi mmol−1) were mixed well by vortexing and incubated under aerobic conditions for 5 days at 100 rpm and 30 °C. Parallel samples were used for the number of degradation genes.
Microbial cells were extracted from 1 g of soil by density gradient centrifugation (Burmølle et al., 2003), using OptiPrep Density Gradient Medium (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). Extracted cells were homogenized and washed by glass tissue grinder (Thomas Scientific®) with 500 μL of sterile tap water three times. Dilutions of the washed cells were filtered on 0.22-μm white polycarbonate filters. The filters were placed on regular microscopy glass slides (24 × 60 mm), air dried on the bench. The slides were then dipped in liquid film emulsion (Kodak autoradiography emulsion type NTB, NY, USA), air dried, and exposed for 2 days at +4 °C. Exposure conditions and development procedures were performed as described elsewhere (Nielsen and Nielsen, 2005).
The exposed and developed filters were studied with a laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 510 Meta). Microscopic evaluations of active cells were determined from 30 random images taken from each filter. The number of active cells was estimated using the threshold criterion of minimum five silver grains within a circle (Ø = 4 μm) covering a cell. Pasteurized (10 min at 80 °C) control samples or samples without addition of radioactive substrate did not result in formation of silver grain assemblages passing the applied threshold criterion. The total number of bacterial cells at the end of the 5 days incubation in MAR samples was determined by DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining as described elsewhere (Tuomi et al., 2004). Enumeration of the total DAPI count and the number of MAR-positive cells were performed with a custom-made macro for the ImageJ software (version 1.43u) (detailed information about the software can be found at www.cmc.aau.dk).
Microbial community in groundwater
Due to the very low cell number and DNA content in the soil samples, we were not able to obtain a reliable clone library from soil. Therefore, we chose to use Bio-Trap® samplers (Microbial Insights, TN, USA) to capture bacteria from the groundwater zone. Bio-Trap® samplers, containing activated carbon granules as the trapping material, were used to obtain a sample of the groundwater bacterial community. The samplers were installed in two groundwater monitoring wells at approximately 5 m depth at the LOH sampling area. Monitoring well 608 was situated on the edge of a forest, at a sandy ridge next to the waterworks, whereas monitoring well PM was located approximately 100 m away on a slight slope, surrounded by small-scale industries. After 4 months, the samplers were retrieved, transported to the laboratory, and opened in sterile conditions. The bacterial DNA was extracted directly from the sampler material using the same protocol as for extracting DNA from soil.
The number of atzA and atzB genes in the DNA was quantified as described above. The bacterial community composition was investigated by constructing a clone library of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes in the extracted DNA pool (Yli-Hemminki et al., 2014). One clone library was constructed from each groundwater well, each consisting of 100 clones. Cloned inserts were sequenced using T7 and T3 sequencing primers at Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea). The sequences were deposited in the GenBank with the accession numbers KJ670501-KJ670677. The sequences were compared with those found in the NCBI Sequence Database using the BLAST tool on 19.5. 2011. Species richness was estimated by calculating Colwell rarefactions with EstimateS software version 9.1 and plotting the rarefaction curves.
Results
Atrazine mineralization
Atrazine mineralization was marginal in the microcosms where no bacteria or carbon was added, indicating low natural degradation (Fig. 1b). The addition of atrazine-degrading bacteria markedly increased atrazine mineralization (Fig. 1a, Table 1), and maximum mineralization in SNP samples using biostimulation at 10 °C was at the same level as in the bioaugmented LOH samples incubated at 30 °C (Fig. 1d, Table 1). However, the most efficient mineralization was achieved by a combination of additional carbon source and atrazine-degrading bacterium (Fig. 1c, Table 1). Amendment by A. aurescens and citrate mineralized 76 % of labeled atrazine (Fig. 1c, Table 1). The highest atrazine mineralization rate, 27 ± 1.4 % day−1, was at 30 °C in unsaturated soil amended with atrazine and augmented with P. citronellolis (Table 1).
Quantification of atrazine degradation genes by qPCR
The degradation genes atzA, trzN, and atzB genes were quantified at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of the experiment (day 42). The gene copy levels did not show a marked change after the midpoint of the experiment (21 days). The copy numbers in situ (representing the beginning of the experiment), and at the end of the experiment (42 days), are displayed in Table 1.
The gene copy numbers in situ were low, but increased when bioaugmentation treatments were used (Table 1). One-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant increase in degradation gene copy numbers in the bioaugmented microcosms (p < 0.001, <0.000, and <0.001 for atzA, trzN, and atzB gene copy numbers, respectively). Citrate amendment supported higher atzA gene copy numbers, irrespective of bioaugmentation with bacteria (p = 0.031), suggesting that the native bacterial population can be activated with citrate amendments. The smallest changes of gene copy numbers were observed in microcosms where commercial atrazine was added without carbon amendments.
Concentrations of atrazine and its degradation products
The concentration of atrazine and its degradation products in atrazine-spiked soil at the beginning (0 day), in the middle (35 days for 30 °C and 56 days for 10 °C), and the end (56 days for 30 °C and 112 days for 10 °C) of the experiments are presented in Fig. 2. At 30 °C, atrazine concentration was reduced by 17–61 % in all soil layers while at 10 °C, the greatest atrazine removal was 34 %. The accumulation of degradation products, especially HA and DIA, was observed. At the beginning of the experiment, no HA was detected, but it started to accumulate at the midpoint of the experiment indicating atrazine degradation, even though the degradation genes atzA and trzN were not detected by quantitative PCR (qPCR). The commercial atrazine used to spike the microcosms contained DIA as an impurity, which was found in the beginning of the experiment at approximately 0.35 mg kg−1 soil (dw). It is therefore difficult to estimate the proportion of DIA formed out of degraded atrazine. The maximum concentration of DEA in soil was 0.01 mg kg−1; the concentration of DEDIA was below detection limit (0.005 mg kg−1) (data not shown).
Active atrazine-degrading cells
The total numbers of bacteria after 5 days of incubation, based on DAPI count, were 5.3 × 106 cells g−1 in unamended soil, 7.1 × 106 cells g−1 in soil amended with citrate, and 2.0 × 106 cells g−1 in soil inoculated with P. citronellolis and A. aurescens. The mean numbers of active atrazine-degrading cells, based on MAR incubation, were 1.8 × 104, 1.3 × 105, and 3.8 × 104 cells g−1 soil at 30 °C, respectively. The mean proportions of the atrazine-degrading bacteria estimated by MAR in different treatments were thus 0.3 % of the total cell count in native soil, 1.9 % in bioaugmentation treatment, and 1.8 % in biostimulation treatment. An example of representative MAR image is shown in Figure S2. Atrazine mineralized poorly in this experiment: radiorespirometric measurements parallel to the MAR experiments showed that <1 % of the labeled atrazine mineralized.
In the unamended soil, the silver grain densities around MAR-positive cells were generally smaller than in amended soils, indicating less active atrazine incorporation. When citrate- or atrazine-degrading bacteria were added, the differences in silver grain densities varied between the MAR-positive cells, indicating that some of the atrazine degraders were stimulated by the presence of citrate and that the amended degraders were actively degrading atrazine.
Microbial community in groundwater
In groundwater monitoring well 608, the most common bacterial phyla were identified as α-, β-, and γ-proteobacteria and Actinobacteria (Table 2). Sequences of strains belonging to Rhodococcus, Pseudomonas, and Arthrobacter were found on this site. Seventy-seven percent of the clones were most closely related to members of cultured species; the most numerous of these clones were identified as Acinetobacter, Aminobacter, and Rhodococcus. The bacterial community composition in groundwater well PM differed from that of well 608 (Table 3). All clones belonged to either α-, β-, or γ-proteobacterial phyla, and Rhodobacter were commonly observed. Several matches to clones originating from activated carbon filters used for drinking water purification were found. As in well 608, many clones (84 %) in well PM were identified as close relatives of the members of cultured species. The PCR assay used for constructing the clone library amplifies 590-bp-long fragments of the 16S rDNA gene.
The copy numbers of atzA and atzB in well 608 were 6.3 × 103 and 2.7 × 104 g−1 activated carbon used as sampler material, respectively, and in well PM 1.3 × 104 and 4.6 × 104 g−1 sampler material, respectively.
Rarefaction analysis revealed that the size of the clone libraries adequately represented the bacterial community inhabiting the Bio-Trap® sampler (Figure S1).
Discussion
We explored the potential of two bioremediation techniques for soils with low atrazine concentration. Atrazine did not naturally mineralize in the boreal subsoils, most likely due to the low organic content and low number of degradation genes (Nousiainen et al., 2014). However, atrazine mineralization could be enhanced significantly by bioremediation treatments.
Biostimulated and bioaugmented (BS/BA) microcosms mineralized up to 76 % of labeled atrazine (Fig. 1). At elevated temperature (30 °C), atrazine mineralization was directed by the bioaugmented strains, likely because the incubation temperature was close to growth optimum of the strains used. In the combined treatments, additional carbon sources did not seem to have a pronounced effect on mineralization. At temperature similar to the ambient temperature in the boreal zone (10 °C), biostimulation of the indigenous, psychrophilic bacteria present in soil was a sufficient treatment method, with up to 52 % of available atrazine mineralized (Fig. 1d). Surprisingly, biostimulation was not successful in the elevated temperature, and based on the methods used in this study, it was not possible to deduce the how biostimulation treatment was dependent on the temperature. It is possible that the psychrophilic, indigenous bacteria suffered from the higher temperature used in this study, but in order to understand which organisms are responsible for the degradation in the boreal soil, more research should be carried out.
The survival of bioaugmentation strains is a key problem, and the persistence of Pseudomonas ADP in triazine bioremediation has previously been disputed (Morán et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2003). Other studies using Arthrobacter different from the one used in the present study have shown that additional carbon decreases the density of the bioaugmented strain during bioremediation (Xie et al., 2012). In our study, A. aurescens genotype trzN/atzB was always present with augmentation. The P. citronellolis-genotype atzA/atzB was only detected when additional carbon was used, indicating that P. citronellolis cannot compete with the autochthonous population in the absence of an additional carbon source. This effect was pronounced when citrate was used, as the net mineralization rate of atrazine was higher in citrate-amended microcosms than in treatments with molasses or controls without carbon. It is noteworthy that in all the microcosms where genotype atzA/atzB was added, also the trzN gene was observed. The prevalence of trzN over atzA gene in the soil environment reported by Arbeli and Fuentes (2010) might explain why it was often encountered in our experiment. Overall, the measured degradation gene numbers were high in bioaugmented treatments, but often below detection limit in the biostimulated treatments. Despite the low gene copy numbers, a significant amount of atrazine disappeared, e.g., 55 % when molasses was used (Table 1). It is possible that carbon addition directed degradation towards dealkylation, rather than dechlorination of atrazine (Ngigi et al., 2013).
It is not possible from the observations made in this study to estimate the significance of the different degradation pathways and to differentiate between the degradation efficiencies of bioaugmented strains and autochthonous bacteria. Despite this, our results suggest that the gene pool provided by the autochthonous bacteria is sufficient for degrading trace amounts of atrazine, and it possibly contains multiple and unidentified pathways for atrazine degradation. We used microautoradiography (MAR) to estimate proportions of atrazine-degrading bacteria from the total bacteria. This method measures the ability to assimilate atrazine at the cellular level and thus the presence and degradation efficiency of microbial cells capable of degrading the compound. The applied approach using density gradient centrifugation most likely secures quite similar cell extraction efficiencies of all soil microorganisms, and thus, a relative estimate of the MAR-positive fraction should allow an unbiased evaluation of the effect provided during the incubation. MAR has predominantly been used in aqueous environments, in which soil colloids provide excellent conditions for single-cell resolution and easy visualization of the produced silver grains. In soils and sediments, extraction of the cells is necessary but may lead to significantly reduced cell recovery (Pascaud et al., 2012). Despite the challenges created by the soil particles, MAR is a robust method for circumventing the need to study specific functional genes, because the activities of the cells are determined by the assimilation of the applied radioactive substrate. In our study, the proportion of atrazine-degrading bacteria was small in all treatments, but it increased when bioremediation treatments were used. The results correlated with degradation gene copy numbers, as the numbers in situ are several orders of magnitude smaller than in biostimulated and bioaugmented treatments. In 1 gram of biostimulated soil, both the number of MAR-positive cells calculated to actual numbers from the total DAPI count and the copy numbers of atzA and atzB genes estimated by qPCR were approximately 104 cells and copies g−1 soil, respectively, after 5 days of incubation. The correlation depends on plasmid copy number. If the catabolic plasmid is present in single copy, the gene copy numbers correlate to the MAR-positive cell numbers, whereas multiple copy plasmids will result in the number of degradation genes exceeding the number of MAR-positive cells. The first scenario was true for in situ conditions, where the number of MAR-positive cells (103 cells g−1 soil) surpass the number of degradation genes (102 copies atzA, 103 copies atzB g−1 soil). It is also likely that some of the MAR-positive bacteria used an unknown degradation pathway we could not target by the applied PCR approach. The highest proportion of known atrazine degraders was expected and observed in the bioaugmentation treatments. Biostimulation treatments also increased the number of degraders, supporting our hypothesis that carbon addition stimulates the native atrazine-degrading bacterial population in carbon-limited soil. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to visualize and enumerate indigenous and bioaugmented active atrazine-degrading bacteria by MAR.
Knowledge about the composition of the autochthonous bacterial community is needed when the bioremediation strategy is chosen. Often the factor limiting degradation is not the absence of contaminant-degrading bacteria or degradation genes, but rather the environmental conditions, which do not favor degradation (Thompson et al., 2005). If potential degraders are absent, bioaugmentation may be the only remediation option. Clone libraries revealed that bacteria belonging to known atrazine-degrading species were residing in the groundwater zone. In well 608, the most common clones were identified as Acinetobacter (24 %), which are known to be versatile degraders and efficient atrazine degraders in high concentration (Singh et al. 2004). Other clones related to potential atrazine degraders included Microbacterium species (Morohoshi et al. 2011), as well as Polaromonas (Devers et al. 2007), Aminobacter (McDonald et al. 2005), Rhodococcus (Behki et al. 1995), Pseudomonas, and Arthrobacter, species extensively studied because of their atrazine-degrading capabilities. As the 16S rRNA gene used for constructing the clone library does not reflect the metabolic functions the bacteria carry out, it is a poor indication of atrazine degradation as such. This is why the presence of degraders was also confirmed by the amplification of degradation genes by qPCR.
Many of the clones in our library were close matches to cultured bacteria. A likely reason is that only the actively growing fraction of the bacterial community is able to colonize the carbon beads of the Bio-Trap® sampler (Sublette et al., 2006). Despite this bias, the clone libraries identified several organisms that belong to phylogenetic groups known to contain atrazine degraders. The prerequisite of growth and the presence of degradation genes on sampler material indicate that the atzA and atzB containing bacteria are actively growing.
The positive effect of carbon additions on atrazine mineralization is probably a result of cometabolic processes (Willems et al., 1996). Contrary findings on carbon-promoted degradation have been observed in agricultural soils having high atrazine concentrations (Silva et al., 2004; Xie et al., 2012). These contradicting results highlight the importance of understanding the effect of environmental conditions, as they heavily impact bioremediation treatment. We hypothesize that in our soil, the low carbon content was the factor limiting bacterial growth, and our results show that changing this parameter allowed the removal of residual atrazine in soil.
The addition of atrazine-degrading bacteria is a powerful tool to remediate contaminated soil. Residual atrazine persisted in nutrient-poor subsoil because the nutritional conditions did not favor its degradation, even though potential degraders were present. In the boreal subsoil examined in this study, the combination of biostimulation and bioaugmentation efficiently removed atrazine. Furthermore, the addition of carbon was an efficient aid in atrazine degradation in itself, suggesting that simple biotechnological applications may be sufficient to remediate atrazine from nutrient-poor environments.
In conclusion, bioremediation of low concentrations of atrazine is problematic, since a limit concentration is required for bacterial degradation of any compound. In the case of carbon-poor, boreal subsoil, where atrazine is most problematic, a simple solution may be provided by balancing the microbially available carbon and nitrogen so that atrazine becomes a lucrative source of nitrogen. However, if applicable, the addition of atrazine-degrading bacteria in soil is a fast and efficient method of removing low atrazine concentrations from boreal soil.
References
Accinelli C, Dinelli G, Vicari A, Catizone P (2001) Atrazine and metolachlor degradation in subsoils. Biol Fertil Soils 33:495–500
Aislabie J, Hunter D, Ryburn J, Fraser R, Northcott GL, Di HJ (2004) Atrazine mineralisation rates in New Zealand soils are affected by time since atrazine exposure. Aust J Soil Res 42:783–792
Arbeli Z, Fuentes C (2010) Prevalence of the gene trzN and biogeographic patterns among atrazine-degrading bacteria isolated from 13 Colombian agricultural soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:611–623
Behki R, Topp E, Dick W, Germon P (1995) Metabolism of the herbicide atrazine by Rhodococcus strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:1955–1959
Blume E, Bischoff M, Moorman TB, Turco RF (2004) Degradation and binding of atrazine in surface and subsurface soils. J Agric Food Chem 52:7382–7388
Bromilow RH, Evans AA, Nicholls PH (1999) Factors affecting degradation rates of five triazole fungicides in two soil types: 2. Field studies. Pestic Sci 55:1135–1142
Burmølle M, Hansen LH, Oregaard G, Sørensen SJ (2003) Presence of N-acyl homoserine lactones in soil detected by a whole-cell biosensor and flow cytometry. Microb Ecol 45:226–236
Cai B, Han Y, Liu B, Ren Y, Jiang S (2003) Isolation and characterization of an atrazine-degrading bacterium from industrial wastewater in China. Lett Appl Microbiol 36:272–276
Chelinho S, Moreira-Santos M, Lima D, Silva C, Viana P, André S, Lopes I, Ribeiro R, Fialho AM, Viegas CA, Sousa JP (2010) Cleanup of atrazine-contaminated soils: ecotoxicological study on the efficacy of a bioremediation tool with Pseudomonas sp. ADP. J Soils Sediments 10:568–578
Cheyns K, Calcoen J, Martin-Laurent F, Bru D, Smolders E, Springael D (2012) Effects of dissolved organic matter (DOM) at environmentally relevant carbon concentrations on atrazine degradation by Chelatobacter heintzii SalB. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95:1333–1341
de Souza ML, Sadowsky MJ, Wackett LP (1996) Atrazine chlorohydrolase from Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP: gene sequence, enzyme purification, and protein characterization. J Bacteriol 178:4894–4900
Devers M, El Azhari N, Udikovic Kolic N, Martin-Laurent F (2007) Detection and organization of atrazine-degrading genetic potential of seventeen bacterial isolates belonging to divergent taxa indicate a recent common origin of their catabolic functions. FEMS Microbiol Lett 273:78–86
Hallberg GR (1989) Pesticides pollution of groundwater in the humid United States. Agric Ecosyst Environ 26:299–367
Jurado A, Vàzquez-Suñé E, Carrera J, López de Alda M, Pujades E, Barceló D (2012) Emerging organic contaminants in groundwater in Spain: a review of sources, recent occurrence and fate in a European context. Sci Total Environ 440:82–94
Kookana R, Holz G, Barnes C, Bubb K, Fremlin R, Boardman B (2010) Impact of climatic and soil conditions on environmental fate of atrazine used under plantation forestry in Australia. J Environ Manag 91:2649–3656
Li Q, Li Y, Zhu X, Cai B (2008) Isolation and characterization of atrazine-degrading Arthrobacter sp. AD26. J Environ Sci 20:1226–1230
Lima D, Viana P, André S, Chelinho S, Costa C, Ribeiro R, Sousa JP, Fialho AM, Viegas CA (2009) Evaluating a bioremediation tool for atrazine contaminated soils in open soil microcosms: the effectiveness of bioaugmentation and biostimulation approaches. Chemosphere 74:187–192
McDonald I, Kämpfer P, Topp E, Warner KL, Cox MJ, Connell Hancock TL, Millen LG, Larkin MJ, Ducrocq V, Coulter C, Harper DB, Murrel CJ, Oremland RS (2005) Aminobacter ciceronei sp. nov. and Aminobacter lissarensis sp. nov., isolated from various terrestrial environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1827–1832
Monard C, Martin-Laurent F, Vecchiato C, Francez AJ, Vandenkoornhuyse P, Binet F (2008) Combined effect of bioaugmentation and bioturbation on atrazine degradation in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2253–2259
Morán AC, Müller A, Manzano M, González B (2006) Simazine treatment history determines a significant herbicide degradation potential in soils that is not improved by bioaugmentation with Pseudomonas sp. ADP. J Appl Microbiol 101:26–35
Morohoshi T, Wang W-Z, Someya N, Ikeda T (2011) Genome sequence of Microbacterium testaceum StLB037, an N-acylhomoserine lactone-degrading bacterium isolated from potato leaves. J Bacteriol 193:2072–2073
Mueller TC, Steckel LE, Radosevich M (2010) Effect of soil pH and previous atrazine use history on atrazine degradation in a Tennessee field soil. Weed Sci 58:478–483
Mulbry WW, Zhu H, Nour SM, Topp E (2002) The triazine hydrolase gene trzN from Nocardioides sp. strain C190: cloning and construction of gene-specific primers. FEMS Microbiol Lett 206:75–79
Nagy I, Compernolle F, Ghys K, Vanderleyden J, De Mot R (1995) A single cytochrome P-450 system is involved in degradation of the herbicides EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate) and atrazine by Rhodococcus sp. strain NI86/21. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:2056–2060
Ngigi AH, Getenga ZM, Dörfler U, Boga HI, Kuria B, Ndalut P, Schroll R (2013) Effects of carbon amendment on in situ atrazine degradation and total microbial biomass. J Environ Sci Heal B 48:40–48
Nielsen JL, Nielsen PH (2005) Advances in microscopy: microautoradiography of single cells. In: Methods in enzymology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 237–256
Nousiainen A, Björklöf K, Sagarkar S, Mukherjee S, Purohit HJ, Kapley A, Jørgensen KS (2014) Atrazine degradation in boreal non-agricultural subsoil and tropical agricultural soil. J Soils Sediments 14:1179–1188
Pascaud A, Soulas M-L, Amellal S, Soulas G (2012) An integrated analytical approach for assessing the biological status of the soil microbial community. Eur J Soil Biol 49:98–106
Sagarkar S, Mukherjee S, Nousiainen A, Björklöf K, Purohit HJ, Jørgensen KS, Kapley A (2013) Monitoring bioremediation of atrazine in soil microcosms using molecular tools. Environ Pollut 172:108–115
Sagarkar S, Nousiainen A, Shaligram S, Björklöf K, Lindström K, Jørgensen KS, Kapley A (2014) Soil mesocosm studies on atrazine bioremediation. J Environ Manag 139:208–216
Silva E, Fialho AM, Sà-Correia I, Burns RG, Shaw LJ (2004) Combined bioaugmentation and biostimulation to cleanup soil contaminated with high concentrations of atrazine. Environ Sci Technol 38:632–637
Singh P, Cameotra SS (2014) Influence of microbial and synthetic surfactant on the biodegradation of atrazine. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:2088–2097
Singh P, Suri CR, Cameotra SS (2004) Isolation of a member of Acinetobacter species involved in atrazine degradation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 317:697–702
Stuart M, Lapworth D, Crane E, Hart A (2012) Review of risk from potential emerging contaminants in UK groundwater. Sci Total Environ 416:1–21
Sublette K, Peacock A, White D, Davis G, Ogles D, Cook D, Kolhatkar R, Beckmann D, Yang X (2006) Monitoring subsurface microbial ecology in a sulfate-amended, gasoline-contaminated aquifer. Ground Water Monit Rem 26:70–78
Thompson IP, van der Gast CJ, Ciric L, Singer AC (2005) Bioaugmentation for bioremediation: the challenge of strain selection. Environ Microbiol 7:909–915
Tuomi PM, Salminen JM, Jørgensen KS (2004) The abundance of nahAc genes correlates with the 14C-naphtalene mineralization potential in petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated oxic soil layers. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 51:99–107
Udiković-Kolić N, Scott C, Martin-Laurent F (2012) Evolution of atrazine-degrading capabilities in the environment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 96:1175–1189
Vuorimaa P, Kontro M, Rapala J, Gustafsson (2007) Torjunta-aineiden esiintyminen pohjavedessä. (Occurrence of pesticides in groundwater). The Finnish Environment 42, Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki (in Finnish)
Wang Q, Xie S, Hu R (2013) Bioaugmentation with Arthrobacter sp. strain DAT1 for remediation of heavily atrazine-contaminated soil. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 77:63–67
Willems HPL, Lewis KJ, Dyson JS, Lewis FJ (1996) Mineralization of 2,4-D and atrazine in the unsaturated zone of a sandy loam soil. Soil Biol Biochem 28:989–996
Xie S, Wan R, Wang Z, Wang Q (2012) Atrazine biodegradation by Arthrobacter strain DAT1: effect of glucose supplementation and change of the soil microbial community. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:4078–4084
Yli-Hemminki P, Jørgensen KS, Lehtoranta J (2014) Iron–manganese concretions sustaining microbial life in the Baltic sea: the structure of the bacterial community and enrichments in metal-oxidizing conditions. Geomicrobiol J 31:263–275
Zhao S, Arthur LE, Coats JR (2003) Influence of microbial inoculation (Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP), the enzyme atrazine chlorohydrolase, and vegetation on the degradation of atrazine and metolachlor in soil. J Agric Food Chem 51:3043–3048
Zwietering MH, Jongenburger I, Rombouts FM, van’t Riet K (1990) Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1875–1881
Acknowledgments
We thank Elina Saario, Jaana Keto, and Ilse Heiskanen for the technical assistance, and the municipalities of Lohja and Hyvinkää for granting us the access to the sampling sites. This research was funded by the Academy of Finland, grant no. 12482, the Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, New Delhi, for the Indo-Finland project (G-1649), as well as the EnSTe graduate school, the NORDFORSK Nordic Environmental Nucleotide Network and the Danish Research Council for Strategic Research via the Centre “EcoDesign.”
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical statement
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 628 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nousiainen, A.O., Björklöf, K., Sagarkar, S. et al. Bioremediation strategies for removal of residual atrazine in the boreal groundwater zone. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99, 10249–10259 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6828-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6828-2