Abstract
The zinc finger proteins Mig1 and Mig2 play important roles in glucose repression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To investigate whether the alleviation of glucose effect would result in an increase in aerobic succinate production, MIG1 and/or MIG2 were disrupted in a succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-negative S. cerevisiae strain. Moreover, their impacts on physiology of the SDH-negative S. cerevisiae strain were studied under fully aerobic conditions when glucose was the sole carbon source. Our results showed that the succinate production for the SDH-negative S. cerevisiae was very low even under fully aerobic conditions. Furthermore, deletion of MIG1 and/or MIG2 did not result in an increase in succinate production in the SDH-negative S. cerevisiae strain. However, the synthesis of acetate was significantly affected by MIG1 deletion or in combination with MIG2 deletion. The acetate production for the mig1/mig2 double mutant BS2M was reduced by 69.72% compared to the parent strain B2S. In addition, the amount of ethanol produced by BS2M was slightly decreased. With the mig2 mutant BSM2, the concentrations of pyruvate and glycerol were increased by 26.23% and 15.28%, respectively, compared to the parent strain B2S.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is well established as a eukaryotic model organism for the study of metabolic engineering (Ostergaard et al. 2000; Nevoigt 2008). In recent years, redirection of metabolic fluxes in S. cerevisiae away from alcoholic fermentation towards other desired chemicals has attracted more and more attention (Saitoh et al. 2005; Zelle et al. 2008). Succinic acid is an essential flavor component produced by S. cerevisiae in sake fermentation (Arikawa et al. 1999), and it is also a potential building block for a wide variety of value-added chemicals made from biomass (Anonymous 2004). As a C4 metabolite mainly produced from the TCA cycle and the glyoxylate cycle, it is a good case study for implementing a metabolic engineering strategy for redistribution carbon fluxes in S. cerevisiae.
Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) is a key enzyme of the Krebs cycle and the electron transport chain, oxidizes succinate, and reduces ubiquinone using a flavin adenine dinucleotide cofactor (Oyedotun and Lemire 2004). The SDH of S. cerevisiae consists of five subunits encoded by the SDH1, SDH2, SDH3, SDH4, and SDH5 genes, respectively (Oyedotun and Lemire 2004; Hao et al. 2009). An increase of succinate production was observed when succinate dehydrogenase activity was lost by the double deletion of SDH1 and SDH2 when S. cerevisiae was cultivated under shake flask conditions; however, the succinate production was still very low (Kubo et al. 2000). In fact, S. cerevisiae has a strong tendency to produce ethanol when external glucose is in excess even under fully aerobic conditions (van Dijken et al. 1993). Moreover, a large number of genes involved in the Krebs cycle, the glyoxylate cycle, and in oxidative phosphorylation are repressed in S. cerevisiae by a regulatory mechanism under high glucose level, a phenomenon known as glucose repression (Santangelo 2006; Rolland et al. 2002; Westholm et al. 2008). Therefore, manipulating the activities of regulatory proteins involved in glucose repression seems to be a rational approach for redirection of carbon fluxes to succinic acid production (Blom et al. 2000).
Mig1 and Mig2 have been recognized as two main effectors in glucose repression. Mig1 is a zinc finger protein that binds to the promoters of many genes and represses their transcription when glucose is added to the medium (Klein et al. 1998; Westholm et al. 2008). Mig2, showing 71% homology to Mig1, also performs a role in glucose repression (Lutfiyya et al. 1998). Deletion of MIG1 gene alone or in combination with MIG2 gene has been shown to alleviate the glucose effect and increase the respiratory activity of S. cerevisiae (Klein et al. 1996; Klein et al. 1999). We wondered whether the deletion of MIG1 and/or MIG2 would improve succinate production in a SDH negative S. cerevisiae strain under aerobic conditions when high concentration of glucose was present.
In the present study, we constructed a SDH-negative S. cerevisiae strain B2S by double deletion of SDH1 and SDH2 from a haploid laboratory strain BY4742, and we further deleted MIG1 and/or MIG2 in strain B2S. Then, the physiological characteristics of these genetically engineered strains were compared, and the impact of MIG1 and/or MIG2 disruption on aerobic carbohydrate metabolism of the SDH-negative S. cerevisiae strain was elucidated in this paper.
Materials and methods
Yeast strains and medium
The yeast strains used are listed in Table 1. Strains were routinely maintained and grown on YPD medium (1% yeast extract, 2% Bacto peptone, and 2% glucose; solid media contained 2% agar). For selection of yeast transformants, G418 or phleomycin was added with the final concentration at 200 and 10 μg/mL, respectively. The mineral salts medium for preculture and batch cultivations was prepared as described by Verduyn et al. (1992). The concentration of glucose was 100 mM. In addition, uracil, histidine, lysine, and leucine were added at a final concentration at 200 mg/L each.
Mutant construction
The SDH-negative strain B2S was constructed by subsequent deleting SDH1 and SDH2 genes in BY4742 with the Cre/loxP recombination system according to the method described by Güldener et al. (1996, 2002). Initially, the SDH1 gene was deleted by replacement of the loxP-ble-loxP cassette amplified from pUG66 (from EUROSCARF) using the oligonucleotide primers F-KOsdh1 and R-KOsdh1 (Table 2). The sdh1 mutant was selected from geneticin-resistant transformants and verified by PCR analysis. Then, the loxP-kanMX-loxP cassette amplified from pUG6 (from EUROSCARF) using the oligonucleotide primers F-KOsdh2 and R-KOsdh2 for disrupting the SDH2 gene was transformed into the sdh1 mutant strain. The sdh1 and sdh2 double mutant strain was isolated from phleomycin-resistant transformants and confirmed by PCR analysis. The markers were popped out by cre recombinase expressed by pSH47 (from EUROSCARF). Strain B2S was identified as a SDH-negative strain and was used to construct all further strains. To delete the MIG1 gene, a deletion cassette that confers geneticin resistance was made by performing a PCR on plasmid pUG6 using the oligonucleotide primers F-KOmig1 and R-KOmig1 (Table 2). The MIG2 gene was deleted by replacement of the loxP-ble-loxP cassette amplified from pUG66 using the oligonucleotide primers F-KOmig2 and R-KOmig2 (Table 2). The replacement of the MIG1 and the MIG2 ORFs by the amplified modules were verified by PCR analysis of total DNA isolated from the G418 and the phleomycin-resistant transformants, respectively.
Batch cultivations
A single colony from a fresh YPD plate was inoculated into 3 mL YPD and incubated overnight at 30°C shaking at 220 rpm. Cells from 1 mL overnight culture were washed twice with sterilized deionized water, then transferred to a 250-mL flask contain 50 mL mineral salts medium and kept in an orbital shaker set at 220 rpm for 24 h. Batch experiments were carried out at 30°C in 5-L bioreactors with a working volume of 3 L and performed by inoculation of the precultured cells to give a final optical density at 600 nm of 0.1. The aeration rate employed for the batch cultivation was 3.5 L/min and maintained the dissolved oxygen tension above 50% of air saturation. The pH was controlled at 4.5 by the automatic addition of 2 M NaOH or 2 M HCl. The agitation rate was maintained at 400 rpm.
Analytical techniques
Cell growth was monitored by measuring the optical density (OD) at 600 nm in a spectrophotometer. Acetate, pyruvate, and succinate were determined by an ion chromatography system ICS3000 (Dionex,USA) as described by Geng et al. (2008). Glycerol was analyzed by a high-performance liquid chromatography system equipped with a charged aerosol detector (ESA, USA), using a Shodex Asahipak NH2P-50 4E column eluted with 75% (v/v) acetonitrile at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1 at 25°C. Glucose was analyzed by a high-performance liquid chromatography system equipped with a pulsed amperometric detector (Dionex, USA), using a PA-1 sugar analytic column (Dionex, USA) eluted with 100 mM NaOH at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1 at 30°C. Ethanol was determined by an automatic ethanol analyzer SBA-40E (Biology Institute of Shandong Academy of Sciences, China) equipped with an immobilized enzyme electrode.
Analysis of oxygen consumption rates
For oxygen consumption capacity measurements, the cells were grown to mid-log phase in bioreactors, harvested by centrifuging at 1,000×g for 5 min, washed three times with ice-cold deionized H2O, and resuspended in oxygraph buffer [1% yeast extract (w/v), 0.1% KH2PO4 (w/v), 0.12% (NH4)2SO4 (w/v)] at a cell density of 20 OD600 (the value of optical density at 600 nm) units per milliliter. Oxygen consumption rates of the cells were measured with a Clark-type oxygen electrode (Dalian Sane Analytical Instruments Ltd. China), with 100 mM glucose as substrate.
Results
The physiological characteristics of a SDH-negative strain under aerobic cultivation
For this study, the physiological characteristic of a SDH-negative strain B2S was first investigated under fully aerobic conditions in well-controlled bioreactors. Compared to the parent strain BY4742, the specific growth rate of B2S (0.27 ± 0.01 h−1) was decreased by 6.9% in the exponential phase, while the ultimate biomass yield was elevated following the full utilization of glucose (Fig. 1). In addition, a 56.25% increase in succinate production was observed for B2S (Table 3). Moreover, the amounts of acetate and glycerol produced by B2S were reduced by 28.15% and 16.43%, respectively, compared to BY4742 (Table 3). However, no significant difference in amounts of other metabolites between BY4742 and B2S was observed (Table 3).
Impact of MIG1 or MIG2 deletion on SDH-negative S. cerevisiae
To investigate the impact of a single deletion of MIG1 or MIG2 on SDH-negative S. cerevisiae, we constructed strains BSM1 and BSM2 from B2S, with a gene complete deletion of MIG1 and MIG2, respectively. Then, aerobic batch culture growth of the strains B2S, BSM1 and BSM2 was investigated (Fig. 1a). During the exponential growth phase, the specific growth rate for BSM1 (0.29 ± 0.01 h−1) was higher than for B2S (0.27 ± 0.01 h−1), while the specific growth rate for BSM2 (0.24 ± 0.01 h−1) was significantly decreased. The glucose consumption rates corresponded well to the growth characteristics in each strain (Fig. 1b). In addition, the concentrations of acetate, ethanol, pyruvate, glycerol, and succinate in the media were measured when glucose was exhausted (Table 3). The production of acetate for BSM1 was 42.69% lower than for B2S, but no difference was noticed between B2S and BSM2. In contrast, the productions of pyruvate and glycerol were similar for B2S and BSM1 but were increased by 26.23% and 15.28%, respectively, for BSM2 compared to B2S. However, no significant difference was observed in amount of ethanol formed by the strains B2S, BSM1, and BSM2. In addition, a significant increase in succinate production was not observed either in BSM1 or in BSM2. To test whether the deletion of MIG1 and/or MIG2 would result in an increase of respiratory capacity, we measured oxygen consumption rates of the cells grown to mid-logarithmic phase (Fig. 2). The oxygen consumption rate of B2S was not significantly affected by deletion of MIG1, while it was drastically decreased by deletion of MIG2.
Impact of MIG1 and MIG2 double deletion on SDH-negative S. cerevisiae
To investigate the combination effects of Mig1 and Mig2 on aerobic carbohydrate metabolism in a SDH-negative strain, we constructed BS2M from B2S by double deletion of MIG1 and MIG2. Under fully aerobic batch cultivations, the specific growth rate of BS2M (0.22 ± 0.02 h−1) was similar to that of BSM2 (0.24 ± 0.01 h−1) but was 16.25% and 22.09% lower than that of B2S (0.27 ± 0.01 h−1) and BSM1 (029 ± 0.01 h−1), respectively (Fig. 1a). The concentrations of ethanol, acetate, pyruvate, glycerol, and succinate produced by BS2M were also determined (Table 3). Interestingly, the acetate production in BS2M was drastically reduced further. Compared to strain BSM1 and B2S, the acetate production in BS2M was reduced by 47.31% and 69.72%, respectively. Furthermore, the ethanol production in BS2M was slightly decreased, whereas the concentration of pyruvate produced by BS2M was increased by 14.75%, compared to B2S. However, no significant difference between B2S and BS2M in succinate production was observed (Table 3). In addition, the respiratory capacity of BS2M was also not increased, compared to B2S (Fig. 2).
Discussion
As it is well known, succinate is an intermediate product of the TCA cycle. The ablation of succinate dehydrogenase activity would be expected to result in accumulation of succinate. Previously, several groups have studied the metabolism of SDH-negative S. cerevisiae cells under anaerobic conditions or oxygen-limited shake flask conditions (Arikawa et al. 1999; Kubo et al. 2000; Camarasa et al. 2003). However, studies under fully aerobic metabolism of a SDH-negative S. cerevisiae strain have not been reported so far. Because oxygen limitation might hamper the carbon fluxes into the TCA cycle in S. cerevisiae, we first examined the metabolism of the SDH-negative S. cerevisiae B2S under fully aerobic conditions on 100 mM glucose in well-controlled bioreactors. Compared to an earlier study in which a SDH-negative S. cerevisiae strain showed a 51.9% increase in succinate production when cultivated under oxygen-limited shake flask conditions (Kubo et al. 2000), the succinate production for the SDH-negative strain B2S was only increased by 56.25% under fully aerobic conditions in our study. This finding indicated that the oxygen limitation might not be the key restricting factor for succinate production when high glucose was present. Moreover, a drastic reduction of acetate was also observed in B2S. Because succinate dehydrogenase is an important component of electron transport system in mitochondria, the inactivation of SDH will result in respiratory deficiency and affect the efficiency of the electron transport chain under aerobic conditions (Cooley and Vermaas 2001). Consequently, the capacity of mitochondrial NADH oxidation might be indirectly affected and should result in NAD+/NADH imbalance. Therefore, the decreased acetate production observed in B2S might partly be due to surplus NADH. However, in conflict with our result, an earlier study had shown that acetate production of a SDH-deficient strain was significantly increased compared to the wild strain (Romano and Kolter 2005). One possible reason might be the different cultivation conditions between the two studies.
To investigate whether the alleviation of glucose repression in the SDH-negative S. cerevisiae strain would prompt the succinate production, we further deleted MIG1 and/or MIG2 in B2S. Previously, several studies have demonstrated that the expressions of a number of genes involved in the TCA cycle, the glyoxylate shunt and the respiration were upregulated in a mig1 mutant or in a mig1/mig2 double mutant (Westholm et al. 2008; Westergaard et al. 2007). However, the carbon fluxes toward the TCA cycle and the glyoxylate cycle did not seem to be remarkably increased in our study, because the accumulation of succinate was not significantly enhanced by further deletion of MIG1 and/or MIG2 in B2S (Table 3). Moreover, the ethanol production was also predominant in all the mutants constructed in our study. Because a limited respiratory capacity of S. cerevisiae has been considered as the one of main causations which lead to aerobic alcoholic fermentation (Vemuri et al. 2007), we measured oxygen consumption rates of the cells to test whether the deletion of MIG1 and/or MIG2 would result in an increase of respiratory capacity of B2S. Indeed, the respiratory capacity was not improved by deletion of MIG1 and/or MIG2 in our study (Fig. 2). This might be one of the reasons why the succinate production was not further improved by deletion of MIG1 and/or MIG2 in B2S.
Compared to Mig1, Mig2 has been elucidated to have minor impact on carbohydrate metabolism of S. cerevisiae on 2% glucose, because only a few genes were significantly affected in a mig2 single mutant at transcription level (Westholm et al. 2008). However, the change in gene expression cannot always reflect the real change of metabolism. In the present study, we found the respiratory capacity was significantly decreased by deletion of MIG2 in B2S (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the production of glycerol and pyruvate were also significantly affected by MIG2 disruption. These results indicated that Mig2 also played an important role in the regulation of carbohydrate metabolism in S. cerevisiae, and the mechanism of Mig2 in the regulation of metabolism should be further investigated at multilevel (RNA, proteins, metabolites).
In the present study, we have demonstrated that aerobic succinate production in the SDH-negative S. cerevisiae strain was not restricted by limited oxygen. Furthermore, deletion of MIG1 and/or MIG2 did not result in an increase in aerobic succinate production for the SDH-negative S. cerevisiae strain. This might be partly due to the limited respiratory capacity, which was also not improved by deletion of MIG1 and/or MIG2. However, a significant decrease in acetate production was observed in B2S, BSM1, and BS2M, compared to BY4742. Especially, the acetate production in BS2M was reduced by 69.72% and 78.29%, respectively, compared to B2S and BY4742. In addition, a slight decrease in ethanol production was also observed in BS2M, compared to B2S. These findings indicated that the double deletion of MIG1 and MIG2 could potentially have a positive effect on redistribution of carbon fluxes to maximum succinate production in further studies.
References
Anonymous (2004) Top value added chemicals from biomass: volume i -- Results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas. doi:10.2172/15008859
Arikawa Y, Kuroyanagi T, Shimosaka M, Muratsubaki H, Enomoto K, Kodaira R, Okazaki M (1999) Effect of gene disruptions of the TCA cycle on production of succinic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 87(1):28–36
Blom J, De Mattos MJ, Grivell LA (2000) Redirection of the respiro-fermentative flux distribution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpression of the transcription factor Hap4p. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(5):1970–1973
Camarasa C, Grivet JP, Dequin S (2003) Investigation by 13 C-NMR and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) deletion mutant analysis of pathways for succinate formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during anaerobic fermentation. Microbiology 149(Pt 9):2669–2678
Cooley JW, Vermaas WF (2001) Succinate dehydrogenase and other respiratory pathways in thylakoid membranes of Synechocystis sp. strain pcc 6803: capacity comparisons and physiological function. J Bacteriol 183(14):4251–4258
Geng X, Zhang S, Wang Q, Zhao ZK (2008) Determination of organic acids in the presence of inorganic anions by ion chromatography with suppressed conductivity detection. J Chromatogr A 1192(1):187–190
Gueldener U, Heck S, Fielder T, Beinhauer J, Hegemann JH (1996) A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 24(13):2519–2524
Gueldener U, Heinisch J, Koehler GJ, Voss D, Hegemann JH (2002) A second set of loxP marker cassettes for Cre-mediated multiple gene knockouts in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 30(6):e23
Hao HX, Khalimonchuk O, Schraders M, Dephoure N, Bayley JP, Kunst H, Devilee P, Cremers CW, Schiffman JD, Bentz BG, Gygi SP, Winge DR, Kremer H, Rutter J (2009) SDH5, a gene required for flavination of succinate dehydrogenase, is mutated in paraganglioma. Science 325(5944):1139–1142
Klein CJ, Olsson L, Ronnow B, Mikkelsen JD, Nielsen J (1996) Alleviation of glucose repression of maltose metabolism by MIG1 disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 62(12):4441–4449
Klein CJ, Olsson L, Nielsen J (1998) Glucose control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of MIG1 in metabolic functions. Microbiology 144(Pt 1):13–24
Klein CJ, Rasmussen JJ, Ronnow B, Olsson L, Nielsen J (1999) Investigation of the impact of MIG1 and MIG2 on the physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biotechnol 68(2–3):197–212
Kubo Y, Takagi H, Nakamori S (2000) Effect of gene disruption of succinate dehydrogenase on succinate production in a sake yeast strain. J Biosci Bioeng 90(6):619–624
Lutfiyya LL, Iyer VR, DeRisi J, DeVit MJ, Brown PO, Johnston M (1998) Characterization of three related glucose repressors and genes they regulate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 150(4):1377–1391
Nevoigt E (2008) Progress in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 72(3):379–412
Ostergaard S, Olsson L, Nielsen J (2000) Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64(1):34–50
Oyedotun KS, Lemire BD (2004) The quaternary structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae succinate dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem 279(10):9424–9431
Rolland F, Winderickx J, Thevelein JM (2002) Glucose-sensing and -signalling mechanisms in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 2(2):183–201
Romano JD, Kolter R (2005) Pseudomonas-Saccharomyces interactions: influence of fungal metabolism on bacterial physiology and survival. J Bacteriol 187(3):940–948
Saitoh S, Ishida N, Onishi T, Tokuhiro K, Nagamori E, Kitamoto K, Takahashi H (2005) Genetically engineered wine yeast produces a high concentration of L-lactic acid of extremely high optical purity. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(5):2789–2792
Santangelo GM (2006) Glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70(1):253–282
van Dijken JP, Weusthuis RA, Pronk JT (1993) Kinetics of growth and sugar consumption in yeasts. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 63(3–4):343–352
Vemuri GN, Eiteman MA, McEwen JE, Olsson L, Nielsen J (2007) Increasing NADH oxidation reduces overflow metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(7):2402–2407
Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP (1992) Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 8(7):501–517
Westergaard SL, Oliveira AP, Bro C, Olsson L, Nielsen J (2007) A systems biology approach to study glucose repression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 96(1):134–145
Westholm JO, Nordberg N, Muren E, Ameur A, Komorowski J, Ronne H (2008) Combinatorial control of gene expression by the three yeast repressors Mig1, Mig2 and Mig3. BMC Genomics 9:601
Zelle RM, de Hulster E, van Winden WA, de Waard P, Dijkema C, Winkler AA, Geertman JM, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT, van Maris AJ (2008) Malic acid production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: engineering of pyruvate carboxylation, oxaloacetate reduction, and malate export. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(9):2766–2777
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (Nos. 2006AA10A213 and 2007AA091601), and the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Nos. KSCX2-YW-N-007 and KSCX2-YW-G-012). We thank Dr. Xiangfei Kong and James Robert for revising the writing of our manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, H., Yue, M., Li, S. et al. The impact of MIG1 and/or MIG2 disruption on aerobic metabolism of succinate dehydrogenase negative Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89, 733–738 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2894-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2894-7