Abstract
Soil microbial community responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations (eCO2) occur mainly indirectly via CO2-induced plant growth stimulation leading to quantitative as well as qualitative changes in rhizodeposition and plant litter. In order to gain insight into short-term, site-specific effects of eCO2 on the microbial community structure at the plant-soil interface, young beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) from two opposing mountainous slopes with contrasting climatic conditions were incubated under ambient (360 ppm) CO2 concentrations in a greenhouse. One week before harvest, half of the trees were incubated for 2 days under eCO2 (1,100 ppm) conditions. Shifts in the microbial community structure in the adhering soil as well as in the root rhizosphere complex (RRC) were investigated via TRFLP and 454 pyrosequencing based on 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes. Multivariate analysis of the community profiles showed clear changes of microbial community structure between plants grown under ambient and elevated CO2 mainly in RRC. Both TRFLP and 454 pyrosequencing showed a significant decrease in the microbial diversity and evenness as a response of CO2 enrichment. While Alphaproteobacteria dominated by Rhizobiales decreased at eCO2, Betaproteobacteria, mainly Burkholderiales, remained unaffected. In contrast, Gammaproteobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria, predominated by Pseudomonadales and Myxococcales, respectively, increased at eCO2. Members of the order Actinomycetales increased, whereas within the phylum Acidobacteria subgroup Gp1 decreased, and the subgroups Gp4 and Gp6 increased under atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Moreover, Planctomycetes and Firmicutes, mainly members of Bacilli, increased under eCO2. Overall, the effect intensity of eCO2 on soil microbial communities was dependent on the distance to the roots. This effect was consistent for all trees under investigation; a site-specific effect of eCO2 in response to the origin of the trees was not observed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The global atmospheric CO2 concentration has increased by >30 % since the industrial revolution to approximately 395 ppm currently (www.esrl.noaa.gov) and is expected to reach 1,000 ppm by 2100 [1], due to fossil fuel burning and changes in land use patterns [2]. This rapid increase in the atmospheric CO2 concentration led to a considerable interest in the potential of biological systems to mitigate the effect of this greenhouse gas by enhanced carbon (C) sequestration. Especially, forests accounting for a large proportion of global net primary productivity [3] are in the focus of research [4–7]. It could be demonstrated that elevated CO2 (eCO2) increased the carboxylation efficiency of Rubisco [8], resulting in an increased C fixation [9], a higher C allocation and thus an altered plant chemistry (C/N ratio, concentrations of sugars, starch, and total nonstructural carbohydrates) [10], and higher aboveground and belowground plant biomass [11]. While the stimulating effects of eCO2 on plants have been extensively studied since more than 20 years, the impact of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on soil microbial communities and their activities has received scarce attention. However, microorganisms are key drivers of the nutrient turnover, and consequently, getting more insight into soil microbial responses to eCO2 is critical for the understanding of the global nutrient cycling and of the potential of soils acting as C sink or source under future climatic conditions [12, 13].
As the CO2 concentration in soil is 10 to 15 times higher than in the atmosphere [14], it is unlikely that atmospheric CO2 enrichment has direct effects on soil communities. However, eCO2 may influence soil ecosystems indirectly through CO2-induced plant responses, mainly through changes in the rhizodeposition (including plant secretions like enzymes and mucilage, sloughing off of dead plant cells, root turnover, and root exudation) [15] and litter quality [10]. Several studies showed an increase in organic C input to soils due to higher plant root biomass [16, 17], increased root exudation [12], and enhanced fine root turnover [17, 18]. This additional C input results on one hand in increased microbial biomass and activity in soils under plants grown at eCO2 concentrations [17, 19, 20]. CO2-induced biochemical changes in plant leaves, e.g., increased C/N ratio due to enhanced C allocation, on the other hand, could slow down the decomposition of leaf litter [2, 10], indicating that altered litter quality might have severe effects on the soil nutrient cycling. Moreover, enhanced plant growth under eCO2 results in an increased uptake of mineral nutrients such as nitrogen (N) from soil [18], leading to decreased soil N concentrations mainly in soils that have not been fertilized [5, 21]. Consequently, N becomes the main growth limiting factor in most terrestrial ecosystems [22], and the competition between plants and soil microbes for N will increase under future climatic conditions. Particularly, microorganisms using N compounds as energy source (ammonia oxidizers and nitrite oxidizers) or alternative electron acceptor (denitrifiers) may be negatively affected by stimulated plant growth under eCO2. As these functional groups are important drivers of the terrestrial N cycle, their decrease would have a negative feedback to the availability of N for plant growth, which, in turn, would limit the primary productivity and thus the potential for soil C sequestration.
Previous studies on the effects of eCO2 on microbial communities have examined either total microbial community patterns [4, 7, 14, 23–26], metabolic patterns [27, 28], or specific taxonomic or functional groups like rhizobia [29, 30], pseudomonads [31, 32], ammonium oxidizers, and denitrifiers [6]. However, due to the complex interactions with biotic and abiotic factors and the limitation of conventional molecular methods used for the characterization of soil microbial communities, the responses of microbial communities to eCO2 are still poorly understood and contradictory. It has been assessed that the diversity and activity of microbial communities increase [4, 14, 25], decrease [6, 33], or remain unchanged [7, 23]. The apparent disparity could on one hand be due to different methods used targeting the microbial phenotypic (lipid analysis) or genotypic (analysis of nucleic acids) and the related differences in the degree of resolution. On the other hand, the contrasting results might be due to real differences among various ecosystems as eCO2 effects have been considered both ecosystem and plant specific [24, 26] or even depending on the plant age and plant development stage. In this respect, still studies are rare where questions related to the resilience of microbial communities at the plant soil interface from genetically similar plants of comparable ontogenetic age grown at sites with differing climatic conditions have been addressed. Therefore, in the present study, potential effects of eCO2 on the microbial rhizosphere community of young beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) originating from opposing mountainous slopes (northeast (NE) and southwest (SW)), resulting in different natural microclimates due to higher radiation at SW, were investigated. Although soil type and nutrient availability are similar at both slopes, previous studies investigating fungal communities showed significant differences in ectomycorrhizal assemblies still present when growing the plants under similar greenhouse conditions [34], indicating site-specific adaptations of the respective plant-soil systems due to different climatic conditions.
In our study, we hypothesize (1) that eCO2 will alter the microbial community composition due to changed quantity and quality of C input into soil in the rhizosphere of beech trees, even after short incubation periods (2 days). We postulate further (2) that beech ecotypes from sites with contrasting environmental conditions will respond differently to eCO2, resulting in site-specific changes in the associated soil microbial communities. To test these hypotheses, young beech trees from two contrasting mountainous sites in Germany were transferred to the greenhouse and grown under ambient (360 ppm) CO2 conditions. A subset of the trees was incubated for 2 days under elevated (1,100 ppm) CO2 conditions. For characterizing changes in the microbial community structure in the root rhizosphere complex as well as in the adhering soil, TRFLP and 454 pyrosequencing were used. Furthermore, alterations in the microbial community composition were linked to plant biomass and soil N pools.
Materials and Methods
Experimental Design
In July 2010, young beech trees (F. sylvatica L.) with a stem height of 50 cm were collected from two sites (32 trees per site) with opposing exposure (NE and SW) from a beech-dominated forest in the Swabian Jura, a low mountain range in Southern Germany (8° 45′ E/47° 59′ N). The sites were within a distance <1 km of each other and showed similar forest population genetics [35]. The soil on both sites was classified as shallow Rendzic Leptosol (sceletic) with a pH of 5.7 in the organic layer and 7.5 at 0.6 m depth [36, 37]. The higher radiation at SW resulted in increased daily maximum of air and soil temperatures and thus reduced water availability [38].
After removing the root-adhering soil using running water, the trees were planted separately in 5 l pots (17 × 17 × 17 cm) containing a homogenous mixture of coarse sand (diameter 0.7–1.2 mm, Melo Schwimmbadtechnik, Göttingen, Germany), fine sand (diameter 0.4–0.8 mm, Melo Schwimmbadtechnik), and peat (Torfwerk Zubrägel, Vechta, Germany) in a ratio of 4.5:4.5:1. To match stand light conditions, the trees were shaded with a 65 % shading net (Herrmann Meyer KG, Rellingen, Germany) and placed outside (Forest Botanical Garden, University of Göttingen, 9° 57′ E /51° 33′ N). Each plant was watered daily with 50 ml tap water. After 1 month, the trees were transferred into a greenhouse with 20 °C temperature, 50 % relative humidity, a photoperiod of 16 h daylight (additional light by MT 400 DL/BH lamps, Eye Iwasaki Electric Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and ambient CO2 atmosphere (360 ppm CO2, UNOR 610 CO2 analyzer, Maihak, Hamburg, Germany). Each tree was watered daily with 50 ml Hoagland nutrient solution [39]. Nitrogen was applied as ammonium-nitrate (concentration 0.4 mM), resulting in reduction of 60–80 % of bioavailable N sources (ammonium, nitrate, DON) compared to the original soil and consequently N limiting growth conditions for plants (data not shown). After the equilibration phase in the greenhouse, the trees were still well developed and did not show any signs of senescence.
On Oct. 4, 2010, eight trees per site were sampled and treated as control plants; immediately afterwards, CO2 concentrations were increased to 1,100 ppm CO2 (UNOR 610 CO2 analyzer, Maihak, Hamburg, Germany) using 13C-labeled CO2 gas (1.5 % 13C–CO2, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Andover, USA) for 2 days. Eight plants per site were sampled 1, 3, and 8 days after the start of the 13C–CO2 pulse. For analysis of microbial community, responses to eCO2 samples taken 8 days after the start of the labeling were chosen as this represented the time point with the highest 13C enrichment in tree root biomass. A scheme of the experiment is shown in the supplement (Fig. S2).
For nucleic acid analyses, subsamples of rhizosphere soil (RS, defined as soil attached to roots after slight shaking) and root rhizosphere complex (RRC, defined as fine roots with tightly adhering soil that cannot be removed by vigorous shaking) [40] were immediately frozen on dry ice and stored at −80 °C for DNA extraction. A subsample was dried at 105 °C for determination of the water content. Another soil subsample was directly extracted 1:2 (soil/solution) with 0.5 M K2SO4 on a rotary shaker for 1 h. Afterwards, the extracts were vacuum filtered using pumps and glass fiber filters [41] and stored at −20 °C for the analysis of extractable soil C and N pools. Plant material was separated into leaves, stem, and roots and dried at 60 °C for 1 week to determine dry biomass and subsequently 13C enrichment.
Extractable Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Pools
Extractable soil C and N pools were analyzed as described by Dannenmann et al. [41]. For the determination of ammonium and nitrate concentrations, a subsample of the filtered extracts was analyzed colorimetrically by a commercial laboratory (Dr. Janssen, Gillersheim, Germany). Total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) in the extracts were quantified on an Infrared TOC analyzer with a coupled chemoluminescence-based total N module (DIMATEC GmbH, Germany). TOC concentrations were referred to as extractable dissolved organic carbon (DOC), while extractable dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) was calculated as the difference between TN and dissolved inorganic N (ammonium plus nitrate).
Nucleic Acid Extraction
DNA was extracted from 0.4 g RS and 0.1–0.2 g RRC, respectively, using the NucleoSpin Soil Kit (Macherey Nagel, Düren, Germany) with SL2 lysis buffer and enhancing solution SX according to manufacturer’s instructions and the Precellys 24 Instrument (Bertin Technologies, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France). Quality and quantity of the extracted nucleic acids were checked with a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, PeqLab, Erlangen, Germany) and standard gel electrophoresis. The extracts were stored until use at −20 °C.
Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (TRFLP)
The bacterial community structure of RS and RRC was analyzed for samples maintained at ambient CO2 atmosphere (aCO2) and 6 days after the 13C–CO2 pulse (eCO2), respectively. For the amplification of 1.4 kb fragments of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene, the universal eubacterial primers 27f (5′-aga gtt tga tcm tgg ctc ag-3′, 6-Fam-labelled) and 1401r (5′-cgg tgt gta caa gac cc-3′) were used [42]. PCR reactions were performed in 50 μl, containing 60 ng template DNA, 0.3 % bovine serum albumin (BSA), (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany), 5 % dimethyl sulfoxid (DMSO) (Sigma Aldrich), 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide (dNTP) (Fermentas, St. Leon Rot, 287 Germany), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 2.5 U Taq Polymerase (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany), 1× Taq buffer (Life Technologies), and 10 pmol of each primer. PCR was performed in a T3 thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany) using the following conditions: 10 min at 94 °C for initial denaturation, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 57 °C, and 1.5 min at 72 °C, and a final extension step for 10 min at 72 °C. PCR amplicons were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The enzymatic restriction was conducted using 200 ng of labeled PCR product, 5 U of MspI (Fermentas), and 1× reaction buffer in a final volume of 25 μl. After incubation at 37 °C for 6 h and subsequently 20 min at 65 °C, the samples were purified using the Gel and PCR Cleanup Kit (Macherey Nagel, Düren, Germany). The fragments were separated by an ABI 3730 sequencer using MapMarker 1000 (Eurogentec, Köln, Germany) as internal standard. Size and relative abundances of terminal restriction fragments (TRFs) were analyzed using GeneMapper v4.0 software (Life Technologies) and T-REX (http://trex.biohpc.org/) with a binning range of 2 bp. TRFs smaller 1 % of the total peak height were excluded from the analysis. The data analysis of the TRFLP profiles was performed in R v3.0.1 (http://www.R-project.org/) by calculating the relative abundance of TRFs normalized by the total peak height of the respective TRF patterns. The TRFLP profiles were analyzed via Yue Clayton dissimilarity, Euclidean distances of Hellinger transformed data, and principal component analysis of Hellinger transformed data [43], using the R packages shown in the supplement (Table S1).
Barcoded Pyrosequencing and Sequence Data Analysis
As TRFLP and 454 pyrosequencing are capable of recovering highly comparable community structures [44], samples for sequencing were chosen based on previous TRFLP analysis. We selected RS and RRC at ambient and elevated CO2 concentrations. 454 pyrosequencing was performed using the manufacturer’s instructions of the Genome Sequencer FLX System (Roche). For the sequencing analysis of RS, all 32 samples were pooled equimolar to form one composite RS sample. As the TRFLP profiles of RRC showed different diversity patterns between ambient and elevated CO2, the respective 16 samples were pooled equimolar to form one composite RRC sample for ambient and elevated CO2 treatment, respectively.
Amplicon pyrosequencing was performed on a 454 GS FLX Titanium system (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) as previously described [44]. Briefly, the universal eubacterial primers 27f (5′-aga gtt tga tcm tgg ctc ag-3′) and 519r (5′-tat tac cgc ggc kgc tg-3′) were extended with unique Multiplex Identifiers (MID), a four-base library key, and the respective A or B adapters for sample identification. Sequencing PCR was performed in a T3 thermocycler (Biometra GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) with the following conditions: initial denaturation (94 °C, 5 min), followed by 28 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 30 s), annealing (52 °C, 30 s) and elongation (72 °C, 60 s), ending with a final extension (72 °C, 10 min). Each 50 μl PCR reaction contained 1× PCR buffer with 1.8 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 2.5 U High-Fidelity polymerase (Roche), 0.5 mM of each primer, and 50 ng of template DNA. All samples were purified using Gel and PCR Cleanup Kit (Macherey Nagel, Düren, Germany) and quantified via Quant-iT Pico Green dsDNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). After measuring fragment size and concentration via Bioanalyzer 2100 device on a DNA 7500 chip (Agilent, Böblingen, Germany), samples were pooled in an equimolar ratio of 109 molecules μl−1. Subsequently, an emulsion PCR was performed with the following conditions: 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 50 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s and 60 °C for 10 min each. The sequencing run was performed on the 16th part of a picotiter plate. The nucleotide sequence data obtained in this study were uploaded and made available in the NCBI database under the accession numbers SRR1439456, SRR1439619, and SRR1439848.
To reduce sequencing errors, the raw sequences were processed with MOTHUR v.1.14.0 [45] as described in detail by Mrkonjic-Fuka et al. [46]. Briefly, flowgrams were separated according to barcode and primers, with a minimum length of 200 bp per sequence and one respective two mismatches for barcode and primers. After removing the primers, barcode, and homopolymers, the sequences were checked for chimeras by alignment to the SILVA database provided by MOTHUR, which is derived from a sequence collection of the Genomes online database [47]. Mitochondrial sequences were subsequently excluded. A distance matrix was calculated from the high-quality aligned sequences, resulting in operational taxonomical units (OTUs) obtained by the furthest neighbor clustering algorithm. For phylogenetic analysis of Acidobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria, which were the phyla with the highest responsiveness to eCO2, representative sequences of each OTU were clustered in MOTHUR at 90 % similarity level and were aligned to the SILVA database using ARB [48]. OTUs represented by less than two reads were omitted from the phylogenetic dendrograms.
Statistical Analysis
TRFLP profiles were analyzed in R v3.0.1 (http://www.R-project.org/) by calculating the relative abundance of TRFs normalized by the total signal height of the respective TRF patterns. Fragments smaller than 50 bases and TRFs contributing <1 % to the total peak height were excluded from the analysis. Significant differences between compartment, site origin, and CO2 treatment were evaluated using multivariate analysis of variance (Adonis function) based on Yue Clayton dissimilarity and Euclidean distances of Hellinger transformed data. Furthermore, Shannon diversity and Pielou’s evenness indices were calculated for the respective TRFLP profiles. The R packages were listed in the supplement (Table S1).
For the sequence data analysis, distance matrices based on OTUs defined by 97 and 90 % similarity were generated for calculating rarefaction curves, richness, and diversity indices, using MOTHUR v.1.14.0. Moreover, population diversity was calculated on finite mixture models and coverage-based estimates using CatchAll v.2.0 [49]. Phylogenetic analysis of Acidobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria was done on 90 % similarity level with exclusion of OTUs representing less than two reads for phylogenetic trees constructed in ARB.
Results
Plant Biomass and 13C Enrichment
Root, stem, and leaf biomass were not affected by eCO2. Moreover, no difference between beech trees originating from two opposing mountainous slopes with contrasting climatic conditions (NE, cool-moist and SW, warm-dry) was observed, resulting in mean values of 5.28 g (root), 4.30 g (stem), and 1.66 g (leaf). The plant roots showed highest δ 13C values 8 days after the start of 13C–CO2 pulse (data not shown).
Soil Biochemical Parameters
Mean values of soil biochemical parameters are summarized in Table 1. Ammonium concentrations were neither impacted by site nor eCO2 and ranged from 0.69 μg g−1 dry weight (dw) to 0.36 μg g−1 dw. In contrast, the nitrate contents decreased significantly at eCO2 on both sites to 0.19 μg g−1 dw in average. While DON did not differ between NE and SW and remained constant at eCO2 with 1.73 μg g−1 dw, overall, DOC concentrations decreased significantly at eCO2 on both sites from 18.95 to 13.50 μg g−1 dw at NE and 17.39 to 12.05 μg g−1 dw at SW. Gravimetric soil moisture was neither influenced by site nor eCO2 and was 8.1 % dw, overall.
TRFLP Analysis of Bacterial Communities Based on 16S rRNA Gene Amplicons
The TRFLP analysis was carried out to perform fingerprinting of bacterial communities in different soil compartments (RS and RRC) of beech trees originating from NE and SW slopes under ambient and elevated CO2 concentrations and to screen for replicate variability (Table 2, Fig. S1). The TRF profiles of RS and RRC differed significantly, but while in samples from RS, no effect of slope origin and CO2 treatment was detected; bacterial community pattern in samples from RRC showed a clear shift after eCO2 (Table S2). The observed TRFs ranged from 51 to 620 bp, with 14 to 18 TRFs larger than 1 % of the total peak height in the respective samples. For RS, TRF 138 bp was the most dominant fragment at both sites and at both CO2 concentrations, with a relative abundance of 21.5 % in average, followed by TRF 264 bp (12.4 %), TRF 148 bp (10.8 %), and TRF 437 bp (5.5 %). The diversity and evenness of the bacterial community in RS were neither influenced by slope origin nor eCO2 treatment (Table 2). In contrast, the bacterial community structure of RRC was highly affected by the eCO2 concentration. For RRC at ambient CO2, TRF 403 bp was the most dominant fragment, accounting for 29.1 % of the total peak height in average, followed by 138 bp (19.2 %), 148 bp (6.8 %), 264 bp, and 132 bp (each 4.6 %). At eCO2, TRF 491 bp was most abundant (29.2 %), followed by TRFs with the length 138 bp (14.7 %), 403 bp (10.5 %), 51 bp (6.2 %), and 132 bp (6.0 %). Both diversity and evenness of bacterial community structure of RRC decreased at eCO2 treatment to 1.99 and 0.60 (mean of NE and SW), respectively (Table 2). When comparing bacterial communities of RS and RRC, RS showed higher diversity and evenness with 2.86 and 0.78, in average (Table 2).
Sequencing Analysis of Bacterial Communities Based on 16S rRNA Gene Amplicons
In total, 17,456 bacterial raw sequence reads were generated from the PCR amplicons by 454 pyrosequencing. After filtering, chimera check, and removing erroneous reads, 8006 high-quality partial 16S rRNA gene sequences with a minimum length of 200 bp remained, which were represented by 1957 OTUs (97 % similarity) and 569 OTUs (90 % similarity), respectively. Rarefaction curves suggested that for RRC, major OTUs were covered, while RS showed still no plateau phase at 90 % similarity level (Fig. 1). Coinciding with TRFLP patterns, the highest bacterial diversity and evenness was observed in RS (5.96 and 0.93), followed by RRC aCO2 (5.59 and 0.89) and RRC eCO2 (3.42 and 0.65). This ranking was confirmed by the CatchAll analysis providing diversity estimates based on modeling. The best fitted model describing the population diversity at RS was a mixture of three geometric distributions, while for both RRC samples, the diversity was best estimated with two-mixed geometric models (Table S3). In total, 10 phyla were detected: Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Armatimonadetes, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadetes, Planctomycetes, Proteobacteria, TM7, and Verrucomicrobia. More than 80 % of the annotated reads were grouped into three major phyla, which were ranked in abundance Proteobacteria > Actinobacteria > Acidobacteria (Fig. 2). Proteobacteria were dominated by members of the class Alphaproteobacteria belonging to the orders Rhizobiales and Rhodospirillales (Fig. 3 and Table S4). Rhizobiales were the most abundant Alphaproteobacteria in all samples, but while at RRC aCO2, this order accounted for 14.0 % of all reads; eCO2 treatment caused a decrease to 7.4 %. In RS, Rhizobiales made up 11.3 % of total reads. The abundance of Rhodospirillales was 6.3 and 6.8 % in RS and RRC aCO2, respectively. At RRC eCO2, Rhodospirillales accounted only for 4.2 % of all reads, but instead Rhodobacterales, which were not detected at aCO2, increased to 3.4 %. Betaproteobacteria were the second most abundant Proteobacteria, with Burkholderiales as predominant order, ranging from 10.2 % at RRC aCO2 to 6.3 % in RS. Gammaproteobacteria increased with eCO2 from 2.7 to 8.2 % of total reads in RRC and were dominated by Pseudomonadales. Accordingly, the abundance of Deltaproteobacteria increased at eCO2 in RRC up to 2.5 %, while in RRC aCO2 and RS, it was <1 % of all reads. Members of the order Myxococcales accounted for 60–72 % within this class and consequently were the predominant Deltaproteobacteria in all samples. Actinobacteria was the second most abundant phylum in RRC, with 17.4 and 21.5 % of total reads at aCO2 and eCO2, respectively. In RS, members of Actinobacteria accounted for 15 % of all reads. Actinomycetales were predominant in all samples, accounting for 55 to 76 % of all Actinobacteria, followed by Acidimicrobiales with 5 to 20 % of all Actinobacteria. While Actinobacteria were highest in RRC eCO2, members of the phylum Acidobacteria were lowest with only 8.7 % of all reads and thus only half as abundant as in RRC aCO2. The highest number of Acidobacteria was found in RS, accounting for 19.5 % of total reads. Members of Acidobacteria Gp1 subdivision were predominant in all samples, ranging from 52 to 90 % of all Acidobacteria (Fig. 4 and Table S4). In RS and RRC aCO2, Gp3 subdivision was the second most abundant, accounting for 9 to 13 % of the Acidobacteria. In contrast, in RRC eCO2, subgroups Gp4 and Gp6 were more abundant (each 16 % of all Acidobacteria) compared to Gp3, which was <1 % of all reads under eCO2 conditions. Bacteroidetes were observed in all samples and were dominated by the order Sphingobacteriales, accounting for 2.0 to 2.7 % of total reads. Members of the phyla Planctomycetes, Gemmatimonadetes, and Firmicutes were only found in RRC eCO2 with >1 % of all reads. All Planctomycetes belonged to the order Planctomycetales, accounting for 3.0 % of all reads. Similarly, all detected Gemmatimonadetes were members of the order Gemmatimonadales, accounting for 2.0 % of total reads. Firmicutes (2.3 % of all reads) were dominated by members of the class Bacilli, belonging to the orders Bacillales, Lactobacillales, and Clostridiales, which made up 74, 22, and 4 % of the Bacilli, respectively. The abundance of unclassified sequences ranged from 16.7 to 27.3 % on order level and 6.3 to 9.4 % on phylum level. All sequence data are presented in Figs. 2, 3, and 4 and Table S4.
Discussion
Effect of Elevated CO2 on Beech Plant Biomass and Soil Biochemical Parameters
The short duration of eCO2 precluded plant growth stimulation that had been observed in other studies under atmospheric CO2 enrichment [11, 19, 50–53]. Regarding bioavailable soil N pools, a significant decrease in nitrate at eCO2 was observed. This is in line with previous studies [5, 18, 21, 54] and might be due to decreased nitrification [21], increased denitrification [6], and/or higher plant uptake [18]. Responses of activity pattern of nitrifiers and denitrifiers may be related to an eCO2-induced increase in the soil water content through reduced stomatal conductance [55] and evapotranspiration [56], although the observed increase in soil moisture was not significant in the present study due to the high standard deviations among the replicates. However, increased soil water content results in lower soil oxygen concentrations in soil and thus may have stimulated in situ denitrification rates. Surprisingly, besides nitrate. also DOC declined under eCO2. This is in contrast to other studies reporting increased [18, 32] or unaffected [6] DOC concentrations in soils under atmospheric CO2 enrichment. The decrease of DOC in the present study might be, on one hand, due to the short incubation time period with eCO2, which did not allow the plant to fully adapt to the changed environmental conditions. Increased activity of denitrifiers, on the other hand, may also lead to fast consumption of DOC, as denitrifiers are heterotrophic microorganisms depending on easily degradable C. Consequently, their growth is favored under eCO2 due to enhanced plant root exudation [12].
Effect of Elevated CO2 on the Bacterial Community Structure in the Rhizosphere of Young Beech Trees
Fingerprinting of bacterial rhizosphere communities performed by TRFLP showed clear differences between the observed compartments (RS and RRC) and their responsiveness to eCO2. While the microbial population structure was unaffected by eCO2 in RS, the diversity as well as the evenness decreased in RRC. This indicates that CO2-induced effects on microbial communities differ depending on their distance to roots. Accordingly, Montealegre et al. [24] observed no influence of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on microbial communities in RS of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) but a clear population shift toward gram-negative bacteria in bulk soil. This may be explained by increasing C supply to bulk soil via mycorrhizal hyphae, as mycorrhizal growth is stimulated under eCO2 [57, 58]. A decreasing microbial diversity under eCO2 was previously found [6, 30] and is likely due to changes in quality and quantity of rhizodeposition favoring specific microorganisms. Although TRFLP could not provide a detailed insight into the microbial community composition, it allowed a relative quantification of CO2-induced changes and thus sample selection for subsequent sequencing analysis, as previous studies comparing TRFLP fingerprints and pyrosequencing data are capable of recovering the same amplicon pools from environmental samples and result in highly comparable overall microbial community pattern [44].
The 10 phyla observed in the present study are commonly found in soils, often with Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Actinobacteria dominating [59]. Within all three phyla, clear differences between ambient and elevated CO2 were found in RRC. Surprisingly, the abundance of Rhizobiales predominating Alphaproteobacteria decreased at eCO2 in RRC. This order contains many diazotrophs, whose enhancement would be advantageous under eCO2 because of increasing N limitation due to stimulated plant growth [11, 13] and enhanced microbial activity [17, 19, 20]. The observed decrease is in contrast with other studies reporting an increased N fixation in grassland ecosystems and plant-free marsh sediments [19]. However, Schortemeyer et al. [29] found an increase in Rhizobium leguminosarium associated with white clover at eCO2, whereas R. leguminosarium in the rhizosphere of perennial ryegrass and in bulk soil was unaffected, indicating that the microbial response is plant-specific. While Betaproteobacteria remained unaffected by eCO2 in the present study, Gammaproteobacteria dominated by the order Pseudomonadales increased in RRC. Pseudomonas sp. are known to be highly rhizo-competent heterotrophs depending on easily degradable C [60, 61] and are consequently stimulated by enhanced root exudation at eCO2 [62]. Accordingly, Marilley et al. [31] observed higher dominance of Pseudomonas sp. in the rhizosphere of perennial ryegrass under atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Moreover, the abundance of genes encoding for labile C degradation was found to increase at eCO2 [19], indicating a fast consumption of root exudates. This is in line with the decreasing DOC concentrations at eCO2 observed in the present study. Besides Gammaproteobacteria, also Deltaproteobacteria were stimulated under eCO2 in RRC. The most abundant Deltaproteobacteria belonged to the order Myxococcales, which were previously found to be increased in the rhizosphere of two perennial grasses grown at eCO2 [25]. Myxococcales are cellulolytic microorganisms [63] and thus likely to be stimulated by enhanced root growth due to eCO2, leading to higher cellulose availability in soil [53].
Members of the order Actinomycetales dominating the phylum Actinobacteria also increased at eCO2 in RRC. Actinomycetales are among the most important litter decomposers [64] and play an important role in the degradation of recalcitrant C including plant cell wall components, e.g., cellulose, hemicellulose, and chitin [65]. Consequently, they may be stimulated by enhanced plant growth due to eCO2 [11]. However, actinomycetes are also known as slow growing, typical bulk soil inhabitants [66], which might explain the conflicting responses to eCO2, ranging from positive (this study, [4]) to unaffected [32, 67] to negative [68].
In contrast to Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria decreased at eCO2 in RRC, overall. Acidobacteria constitute on average 20 % of soil bacteria, with subgroups Gp1 to Gp4 and Gp6 being predominant [59]. Despite their abundance, the physiological properties of this phylum are still largely unknown. However, both pH and soil C content are negatively correlated with the abundance of subgroup Gp1 in a large number of soils [69, 70], indicating the adaptation to oligotrophic conditions [71]. This may explain the observed decrease under eCO2 (this study, [4, 26]), as soil pH may increase via decomposition of organic acids [72] and organic matter with high C/N ratio [73], release of conjugate bases [74], or production of ammonia from organic matter decomposition [75]. Moreover, increased soil C availability can be expected by increased rhizodeposition due to eCO2 [15, 62]. However, members of subgroups Gp5, Gp6, and Gp17 showed the highest relative abundance in nutrient-rich soils [70], indicating that certain Acidobacteria are more copiotrophic than previously suggested. This is in line with the CO2-induced increase of subgroups Gp4 and Gp6 in RRC observed in the present study.
Members of the order Planctomycetales were enriched in RRC at eCO2. Planctomycetes form a distinct phylum and possess phenotypic features which are highly unusual among bacteria, including the lack of peptidoglycan in cell walls and intracellular compartmentalization with the formation of a membrane-bound nucleoid [76]. Members of planctomycetes are commonly found in environmental microbial communities from wastewater and soil [77], including some species with highly unusual physiology but mostly chemoheterotrophs [78, 79] contributing to global nitrogen turnover [76].
Besides Planctomycetes, also Firmicutes represented predominantly by the class Bacilli increased at eCO2 in RRC. Bacilli are gram-positive bacteria that play an important role in the mineralization of plant-derived materials and humus in soils and consequently can be expected to increase in abundance under atmospheric CO2 enrichment due to increased aboveground and belowground plant biomass [11]. This is in line with previous studies [68, 80] but in contrast to results from Drigo et al. [32], who observed no influence of eCO2 on abundance and community composition of the genus Bacillus in the rhizosphere of Carex arenaria and Festuca rubra. However, Drigo et al. [32] observed that abundance and community structure differs regarding plant species and soil origin, which may explain the contradictory results.
Conclusion
The main aim of this study was to provide insight into microbial community responses in the rhizosphere of young beech trees from two different mountainous sites exposed to eCO2 concentrations. The results demonstrated that atmospheric CO2 enrichment clearly altered the microbial community composition already shortly after application, but the effect was dependent on the distance to the roots. Interestingly, an ecotype-related effect of different beech trees obtained from two contrasting sites was not detected, which may be due to the short time period of the study and/or the artificial soil used. This study nicely complements experiments where young beech trees have been incubated for longer time periods with increased CO2 conditions, and the effects were less pronounced compared to the present study [81], indicating an adaption of trees and their associated microflora over time.
References
IPCC (2007) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate change 2007: Synthesis Report, A contribution of Working groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC
Ball S, Drake B (1997) Short-term decomposition of litter produced by plants grown in ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Glob Chang Biol 3:29–35
King JS, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Holmes WE, Schmidt K (2005) Fine root chemistry and decomposition in model communities of north-temperate tree species show little response to elevated atmospheric CO2 and varying soil resource availability. Oecologia 146:318–328
Lesaulnier C, Papamichail D, McCorkle S, Ollivier B, Skiena S, Taghavi S, Zak D, Van Der Lelie D (2008) Elevated atmospheric CO2 affects soil microbial diversity associated with trembling aspen. Environ Microbiol 10:926–941
Janus L, Angeloni N, McCormack J, Rier S, Tuchman N, Kelly J (2005) Elevated atmospheric CO2 alters soil microbial communities associated with trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) roots. Microb Ecol 50:102–109
Kelly J, Peterson E, Winkelman J, Walter T, Rier S, Tuchman N (2013) Elevated atmospheric CO2 impacts abundance and diversity of nitrogen cycling functional genes in soil. Microb Ecol 65:394–404
Lipson D, Blair M, Barron-Gafford G, Grieve K, Murthy R (2006) Relationships between microbial community structure and soil processes under elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Microb Ecol 51:302–314
Ceulemans R, Mousseau M (1994) Tansley Review No. 71 Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on woody plants. New Phytol 127:425–446
Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Ort DR (2004) Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future*. Ann Rev Plant Biol 55:591–628
Cotrufo MF, Briones MJ, Ineson P (1998) Elevated CO2 affects field decomposition rate and palatability of tree leaf litter: importance of changes in substrate quality. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1565–1571
Lindroth RI, Kinney KK, Platz CL (1993) Responses of diciduous trees to elevated atmospheric CO2: productivity, phytochemistry, and insect performance. Ecology 74:763–777
Sadowsky MJ, Schortemeyer M (1997) Soil microbial responses to increased concentrations of atmospheric CO2. Glob Chang Biol 3:217–224
Finzi AC, Norby RJ, Calfapietra C, Gallet-Budynek A, Gielen B, Holmes WE, Hoosbeek MR, Iversen CM, Jackson RB, Kubiske ME, Ledford J, Liberloo M, Oren R, Polle A, Pritchard S, Zak DR, Schlesinger WH, Ceulemans R (2007) Increases in nitrogen uptake rather than nitrogen-use efficiency support higher rates of temperate forest productivity under elevated CO2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:14014–14019
Kandeler E, Tscherko D, Bardgett RD, Hobbs PJ, Kampichler C, Jones TH (1998) The response of soil microorganisms and roots to elevated CO2 and temperature in a terrestrial model ecosystem. Plant Soil 202:251–262
van Veen JA, Liljeroth E, Lekkerkerk LJA, van de Geijn SC (1991) Carbon fluxes in plant-soil systems at elevated atmospheric CO2 levels. Ecol Appl 1:175–181
van Ginkel JH, Gorissen A, Polci D (2000) Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration: effects of increased carbon input in a Lolium perenne soil on microorganisms and decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 32:449–456
Zak D, Pregitzer K, Curtis P, Teeri J, Fogel R, Randlett D (1993) Elevated atmospheric CO2 and feedback between carbon and nitrogen cycles. Plant Soil 151:105–117
Hu S, Chapin FS, Firestone MK, Field CB, Chiariello NR (2001) Nitrogen limitation of microbial decomposition in a grassland under elevated CO2. Nature 409:188–191
He Z, Xu M, Deng Y, Kang S, Kellogg L, Wu L, Van Nostrand JD, Hobbie SE, Reich PB, Zhou J (2010) Metagenomic analysis reveals a marked divergence in the structure of belowground microbial communities at elevated CO2. Ecol Lett 13:564–575
Blagodatskaya E, Blagodatsky S, Dorodnikov M, Kuzyakov Y (2010) Elevated atmospheric CO2 increases microbial growth rates in soil: results of three CO2 enrichment experiments. Glob Chang Biol 16:836–848
Niklaus PA, Kandeler E, Leadley PW, Schmid B, Tscherko D, Korner C (2001) A link between plant diversity, elevated CO2 and soil nitrate. Oecologia 127:540–548
Evans RD (2001) Physiological mechanisms influencing plant nitrogen isotope composition. Trends Plant Sci 6:121–126
Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Ebblewhite N, Paterson E, Killham K (1998) Ryegrass rhizosphere microbial community structure under elevated carbon dioxide concentrations, with observations on wheat rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 30:315–321
Montealegre CM, van Kessel C, Russelle MP, Sadowsky MJ (2002) Changes in microbial activity and composition in a pasture ecosystem exposed to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant Soil 243:197–207
Jossi M, Fromin N, Tarnawski S, Kohler F, Gillet F, Aragno M, Hamelin J (2006) How elevated pCO2 modifies total and metabolically active bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of two perennial grasses grown under field conditions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 55:339–350
Dunbar J, Eichorst SA, Gallegos-Graves LV, Silva S, Xie G, Hengartner NW, Evans RD, Hungate BA, Jackson RB, Megonigal JP, Schadt CW, Vilgalys R, Zak DR, Kuske CR (2012) Common bacterial responses in six ecosystems exposed to 10 years of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Environ Microbiol 14:1145–1158
Grayston SJ, Vaughan D, Jones D (1997) Rhizosphere carbon flow in trees, in comparison with annual plants: the importance of root exudation and its impact on microbial activity and nutrient availability. Appl Soil Ecol 5:29–56
Hodge A, Millard P (1998) Effect of elevated CO2 on carbon partitioning and exudate release from Plantago lanceolata seedlings. Physiol Plant 103:280–286
Schortemeyer M, Hartwig UA, Hendrey GR, Sadowsky MJ (1996) Microbial community changes in the rhizospheres of white clover and perennial ryegrass exposed to free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE). Soil Biol Biochem 28:1717–1724
Montealegre CM, van Kessel C, Blumenthal JM, Hur HG, Hartwig UA, Sadowsky MJ (2000) Elevated atmospheric CO2 alters microbial population structure in a pasture ecosystem. Glob Chang Biol 6:475–482
Marilley L, Hartwig UA, Aragno M (1999) Influence of an elevated atmospheric CO2 content on soil and rhizosphere bacterial communities beneath Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens under field conditions. Microb Ecol 38:39–49
Drigo B, Van Veen JA, Kowalchuk GA (2009) Specific rhizosphere bacterial and fungal groups respond differently to elevated atmospheric CO2. ISME J 3:1204–1217
Carney KM, Hungate BA, Drake BG, Megonigal JP (2007) Altered soil microbial community at elevated CO2 leads to loss of soil carbon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:4990–4995
Leberecht M (2014) Function of mycorrhiza in the competition for nitrogen in calcareous beech forests. ediss Georg-August Universität Göttingen. Göttingen, Germany
Bilela S, Dounavi A, Fussi B, Konnert M, Holst J, Mayer H, Rennenberg H, Simon J (2012) Natural regeneration of Fagus sylvatica L. adapts with maturation to warmer and drier microclimatic conditions. For Ecol Manag 275:60–67
Gessler A, Schrempp S, Matzarakis A, Mayer H, Rennenberg H, Adams MA (2001) Radiation modifies the effect of water availability on the carbon isotope composition of beach (Fagus sylvatica). New Phytol 150:653–664
IUSS (2007) Working Group WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006, first update 2007. FAO, Rome
Gessler A, Keitel C, Nahm M, Rennenberg H (2004) Water shortage affects the water and nitrogen balance in central European beech forests. Plant Biol 6:289–298
Dyckmans J (2000) Untersuchung der Aufnahme und Translokation von C und N in Buchen in Abhängigkeit der atmosphärischen CO2-Konzentration und bauminternen N Vorräte unter Einsatz der stabilen Isotope 15N und 13C. ediss Georg-August Universität Göttingen. Göttingen, Germany
Gschwendtner S, Reichmann M, Müller M, Radl V, Munch J, Schloter M (2010) Effects of genetically modified amylopectin-accumulating potato plants on the abundance of beneficial and pathogenic microorganisms in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 335:413–422
Dannenmann M, Simon J, Gasche R, Holst J, Naumann PS, Kögel-Knabner I, Knicker H, Mayer H, Schloter M, Pena R, Polle A, Rennenberg H, Papen H (2009) Tree girdling provides insight on the role of labile carbon in nitrogen partitioning between soil microorganisms and adult European beech. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1622–1631
Schreiner K, Hagn A, Kyselková M, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Welzl G, Munch JC, Schloter M (2010) Comparison of barley succession and Take-All disease as environmental factors shaping the rhizobacterial community during Take-All decline. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:4703–4712
Blackwood CB, Marsh T, Kim SH, Paul EA (2003) Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism data analysis for quantitative comparison of microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:926–932
Pilloni G, Granitsiotis MS, Engel M, Lueders T (2012) Testing the limits of 454 pyrotag sequencing: reproducibility, quantitative assessment and comparison to T-RFLP fingerprinting of aquifer microbes. PLoS One 7:e40467
Schloss PD (2009) A high-throughput DNA sequence aligner for microbial ecology studies. PLoS One 4:e8230
Mrkonjic Fuka M, Engel M, Gattinger A, Bausenwein U, Sommer M, Munch JC, Schloter M (2008) Factors influencing variability of proteolytic genes and activities in arable soils. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1646–1653
Pagani I, Liolios K, Jansson J, Chen IMA, Smirnova T, Nosrat B, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC (2012) The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v. 4: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucl Acids Res 40:D571–D579
Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar, Buchner A, Lai T, Steppi S, Jobb G, Forster W, Brettske I, Gerber S, Ginhart AW, Gross O, Grumann S, Hermann S, Jost R, Konig A, Liss T, Lussmann R, May M, Nonhoff B, Reichel B, Strehlow R, Stamatakis A, Stuckmann N, Vilbig A, Lenke M, Ludwig T, Bode A, Schleifer KH (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucl Acids Res 32:1363–1371
Bunge J (2011) Estimating the numbers of species with CatchAll. Biocomputing 2011:121–130
Blaschke L, Forstreuter M, Sheppard LJ, Leith IK, Murray MB, Polle A (2002) Lignification in beech (Fagus sylvatica) grown at elevated CO2 concentrations: interaction with nutrient availability and leaf maturation. Tree Physiol 22:469–477
Jongen M, Jones MB, Hebeisen T, Blum H, Hendrey G (1995) The effects of elevated CO2 concentrations on the root growth of Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens grown in a FACE system. Glob Chang Biol 1:361–371
Reich PB, Knops J, Tilman D, Craine J, Ellsworth D, Tjoelker M, Lee T, Wedin D, Naeem S, Bahauddin D, Hendrey G, Jose S, Wrage K, Goth J, Bengston W (2001) Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature 410:809–812
Zak DR, Pregitzer KS, King JS, Holmes WE (2000) Elevated atmospheric CO2, fine roots and the response of soil microorganisms: a review and hypothesis. New Phytol 147:201–222
Insam H, Baath E, Berreck M, Frostegard A, Gerzabek MH, Kraft A, Schinner F, Schweiger P, Tschuggnall G (1999) Responses of the soil microbiota to elevated CO2 in an artificial tropical ecosystem. J Microbiol Methods 36:45–54
Lauber W, Kaerner C (1997) In situ stomatal responses to long-term CO2 enrichment in calcareous grassland plants. Acta Oecol 18:221–229
Stocker R, Korner C, Schmid B, Niklaus PA, Leadley PW (1999) A field study of the effects of elevated CO2 and plant species diversity on ecosystem-level gas exchange in a planted calcareous grassland. Glob Chang Biol 5:95–105
Rillig MC, Allen MF (1998) Arbuscular mycorrhizae of Gutierrezia sarothrae and elevated carbon dioxide: evidence for shifts in C allocation to and within the mycobiont. Soil Biol Biochem 30:2001–2008
Rouhier H, Read DJ (1999) Plant and fungal responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 in mycorrhizal seedlings of Betula pendula. Environ Exp Bot 42:231–241
Janssen PH (2006) Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1719–1728
Berg G, Eberl L, Hartmann A (2005) The rhizosphere as a reservoir for opportunistic human pathogenic bacteria. Environ Microbiol 7:1673–1685
Lugtenberg BJJ, Dekkers L, Bloemberg GV (2001) Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:461–490
Drigo B, Kowalchuk GA, Yergeau E, Bezemer TM, Boschker HTS, Van Veen JA (2007) Impact of elevated carbon dioxide on the rhizosphere communities of Carex arenaria and Festuca rubra. Glob Chang Biol 13:2396–2410
Reichenbach H, Dworkin M (1992) The Myxobacteria. In: Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer KH (eds) The prokaryotes. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 3416–3487
Kopecky J, Kyselkova M, Omelka M, Cermak L, Novotna J, Grundmann GL, Moenne-Loccoz Y, Sagova-Mareckova M (2011) Actinobacterial community dominated by a distinct clade in acidic soil of a waterlogged deciduous forest. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78:386–394
Goodfellow M, Williams ST (1983) Ecology of actinomycetes. Annu Rev Microbiol 37:189–216
Smalla K, Wieland G, Buchner A, Zock A, Parzy J, Kaiser S, Roskot N, Heuer H, Berg G (2001) Bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: plant-dependent enrichment and seasonal shifts revealed. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4742–4751
Drigo B, Pijl AS, Duyts H, Kielak A, Gamper HA, Houtekamer MJ, Boschker HTS, Bodelier PLE, Whiteley AS, van Veen JA, Kowalchuk GA (2010) Shifting carbon flow from roots into associated microbial communities in response to elevated atmospheric CO2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:10938–10942
Hayden HL, Mele PM, Bougoure DS, Allan CY, Norng S, Piceno YM, Brodie EL, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Williams AL, Hovenden MJ (2012) Changes in the microbial community structure of bacteria, archaea and fungi in response to elevated CO2 and warming in an Australian native grassland soil. Environ Microbiol 14:3081–3096
Jones RT, Robeson MS, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N (2009) A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses. ISME J 3:442–453
Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1354–1364
Castro HF, Classen AT, Austin EE, Norby RJ, Schadt CW (2010) Soil microbial community responses to multiple experimental climate change drivers. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:999–1007
Rukshana F, Butterly CR, Baldock JA, Tang C (2011) Model organic compounds differ in their effects on pH changes of two soils differing in initial pH. Biol Fertil Soils 47:51–62
Barekzai A, Mengel K (1993) Effect of microbial decomposition of mature leaves on soil pH. Z Pflanzenernähr Bodenkd 156:93–94
Li Z-A, Zou B, Xia H-P, Ding Y-Z, Tan W-N, Fu S-L (2008) Role of low-molecule-weight organic acids and their salts in regulating soil pH. Pedosphere 18:137–148
Ingelög T, Nohrstedt HÃ (1993) Ammonia formation and soil pH increase caused by decomposing fruitbodies of macrofungi. Oecologia 93:449–451
Fuerst JA, Sagulenko E (2011) Beyond the bacterium: planctomycetes challenge our concepts of microbial structure and function. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:403–413
Buckley DH, Huangyutitham V, Nelson TA, Rumberger A, Thies JE (2006) Diversity of Planctomycetes in soil in relation to soil history and environmental heterogeneity. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4522–4531
Winkelmann N, Harder J (2009) An improved isolation method for attached-living Planctomycetes of the genus Rhodopirellula. J Microbiol Methods 77:276–284
Gade D, Schlesner H, Glockner FO, Amann R, Pfeiffer S, Thomm A (2004) Identification of planctomycetes with order-, genus-, and strain-specific 16S rRNA-targeted probes. Microb Ecol 47:243–251
Sibanc N, Dumbrell AJ, Mandic-Mulec I, Macek I (2014) Impacts of naturally elevated soil CO2 concentrations on communities of soil archaea and bacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 68:348–356
Esperschuetz J, Gattinger A, Buegger F, Lang H, Munch JC, Schloter M, Winkler JB (2009) A continuous labelling approach to recover photosynthetically fixed carbon in plant tissue and rhizosphere organisms of young beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) using 13C depleted CO2. Plant Soil 323:21–29
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG) under the contract numbers SCHL 447/11-1, PO 362/19-1 and DA 1217/2-1. We also heartily thank Konny Galonska for nucleic acid extraction.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Fig. S1
Principal component analysis of TRFLP profiles based on Hellinger transformed data from rhizosphere soil (RS) and root rhizosphere complex (RRC) associated with beech trees originating from NE-exposed and SW-exposed mountainous slopes grown under ambient and elevated CO2 concentrations (aCO2 and eCO2, respectively) after DNA extraction, amplification of 16S rRNA genes, and enzymatic restriction with MspI (n = 8). TRFs smaller 1 % of total peak height were excluded from analysis. (DOC 33 kb)
Fig. S2
Scheme of the experimental design. The sampling times where microbial community analysis was performed are highlighted in bold letters. (DOC 33 kb)
Table S1
(DOC 35 kb)
Table S2
(DOC 28 kb)
Table S3
(DOC 43 kb)
Table S4
(DOC 63 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gschwendtner, S., Leberecht, M., Engel, M. et al. Effects of Elevated Atmospheric CO2 on Microbial Community Structure at the Plant-Soil Interface of Young Beech Trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) Grown at Two Sites with Contrasting Climatic Conditions. Microb Ecol 69, 867–878 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0527-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0527-x