Abstract
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a common orthopedic disorder in children. It can lead to avascular necrosis, cartilage loss, femoroacetabular impingent (FAI) and early osteoarthritis. The consequences of SCFE are worsened by delays in diagnosis and proper management. Radiography is the primary imaging modality used to evaluate SCFE; however, MR, CT and bone scintigraphy have important roles. Preoperatively, these modalities assist in surgical planning and predicting prognosis; postoperatively, they provide assessment of hardware failure, ischemic necrosis and morphology predisposing to FAI. Emphasizing a multimodality approach, this review addresses the imaging diagnosis of SCFE, the expected postoperative appearances and the findings of immediate and long-term complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a common disorder in children, with displacement of the femoral head epiphysis in relation to the metaphysis. It can lead to limitation of function of the hip, early osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis (AVN). Although it is crucial to recognize the radiologic signs of SCFE on initial presentation, it is also important to be familiar with the postoperative imaging findings and potential complications.
Diagnosis
Radiography
Radiographs are the primary modality used in the diagnosis of SCFE. AP and frog lateral views of both hips should be obtained. This is important because a significant percentage of SCFE is bilateral, with the exact number unknown, ranging from 18% to 63% in studies [1]. In addition, comparison with an asymptomatic hip can be helpful to diagnose more subtle cases of SCFE.
Klein’s line—uses and limitations
In the vast majority of cases of SCFE, the epiphysis is displaced posteriorly in relation to the metaphysis, with variable degrees of medial displacement. On frontal radiographs of the hip, the femoral head normally extends past the lateral margin of the femoral neck. A line drawn along the margin of the superior femoral neck and extended to the level of the epiphysis (Klein’s line) transects a portion of the femoral head. If there is medial slip of the femoral head, the line does not intersect it [2]. However, Green et al. [3] noted that in mild cases of SCFE the slipped femoral head still intersects Klein’s line. They suggested a modification, where a slip is diagnosed if the maximum width of epiphysis lateral to Klein’s line differs by more than 2 mm from that of the control hip, raising sensitivity from 40.3% to 79% (Fig. 1) and demonstrating the importance of an AP radiograph of the pelvis and both hips in the diagnosis of SCFE.
Assessing posterior slip
Often the hip is positioned in external rotation and the posterior displacement then becomes more evident on the frontal projection. However, the extent of posterior slip is usually assessed on the frog lateral view, which is more sensitive in the detection of SCFE. Some advocate the use of a true lateral view, with its increased sensitivity to detect abnormal head shaft angle and potential decreased risk of further displacement of the epiphysis compared to frog positioning [4, 5].
Subtle signs on frontal radiographs
An appreciation of the subtleties of SCFE on the frontal radiograph is crucial because frog lateral views might not be obtained when SCFE is unsuspected clinically. The subtle signs should prompt a request for a frog lateral view. These include widening of the physis compared to the contralateral side, relative loss of height of the epiphysis on the affected sign, and the “metaphyseal blanch sign” described by Steel [6], which results from the posterior margin of the posteriorly slipped femoral head overlapping with the metaphysis (Fig. 2).
Valgus slip
Rarely in SCFE, the femoral head is displaced superolaterally and posteriorly in relation to the metaphysis. This is referred to as valgus SCFE [7]. It is usually seen in children with coxa valga, possibly because the more horizontal orientation of the physis in these children predisposes them to a lateral slip [7, 8]. It is important to be aware of this entity, because in these cases the epiphysis continues to intersect Klein’s line. In fact, a larger percentage of the epiphyseal head is lateral to Klein’s line than on the normal side; however, the lateral view demonstrates the posterior component of the slip (Fig. 3) [7].
MRI
MRI is useful in early cases of SCFE, before the displacement of the femoral head relative to the metaphysis is evident radiographically, referred to as “pre-slip SCFE.” MR findings include widening of the physis with bone marrow edema of the metaphysis, joint effusion and synovitis (Fig. 4) [9–11]. MR is also useful in cases of more severe SCFE, where accurate understanding of the geometry of the slip is necessary to determine patient management because the MR appearance is less dependent on specific patient positioning than radiography [11].
CT
The use of CT in the diagnosis of SCFE is limited, but 3‐D models can be a valuable tool in presurgical planning in cases of severe slip [11, 12], as well as in postoperative assessment in complicated cases. For CT as well as MRI, reformats should be generated in appropriate planes to fully characterize the anatomical alterations. An axial/sagittal oblique plane, parallel to the long axis of the femoral neck as seen on coronal images, is most helpful in defining the extent of posterior slip.
US
Sagittal US imaging can demonstrate a step off between the epiphysis and metaphysis, related to the posterior slip of SCFE; however, it has been found to be no better than the frog lateral view assessment. Also, a joint effusion can be seen in acute/unstable cases of SCFE [13, 14].
Categorization of SCFE
The categorization considered most important is whether the SCFE is stable or unstable, and this is determined clinically by the child’s ability to bear weight. Unstable SCFE has a much higher risk of developing AVN [15].
Imaging studies help to characterize SCFE, either by the severity of the slip or the chronicity. The severity can be described by the degree of displacement of the femoral head. The Southwick angle measures posterior angulation of the head with respect to the neck and permits comparison between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides (Fig. 5) [16]. In cases of bilateral SCFE, 12° is used as the normal angle for comparison. Slipped epiphyses can then be divided into three grades based on the slip angle: grade 1/mild (0–30°), grade 2/moderate (30–50°) and grade 3/severe (greater than 50°) [17].
SCFE can also be classified as acute, with less than 3 weeks since onset of symptoms, or chronic. When children present with acute symptoms superimposed on a longer history of hip pain, SCFE is classified as acute on chronic. As with stability, this is a clinical assessment; however, radiologic findings seen in chronic SCFE include sclerosis and irregularity at the physis and remodeling of the metaphysis [18]. It is thought that in chronic SCFE, the slow slip of the femoral head gives the vasculature time to adapt and maintain blood supply [19], with a lower risk of AVN compared to acute cases [5].
Surgical management: postoperative appearance and complications
Factors that determine the surgical management of SCFE include the severity and stability of the slip. Some advocate that all mild to moderate cases of SCFE be pinned in situ, with attempts at reduction being limited to unstable severe slips. Others are willing to attempt reduction on unstable SCFEs of all grades, performing gentle reduction in the operating room or closed reduction with 1–2 weeks of continuous traction, before going on to pin or wire fixation (Fig. 6) [20]. Unstable SCFEs might be reduced unintentionally with the induction of anesthesia and positioning the child on the operating table [15].
Gentle manipulation at the physis is not possible with stable SCFE, and these children are either pinned in situ in mild to moderate cases, or in severe slips undergo osteotomy to improve alignment of the femoral head and to try to prevent early osteoarthritis.
Pin fixation
Fixation of the femoral head can be performed with a screw, which is thought to provide superior stability [21], or with a wire, which can lead to less growth restriction of the physis [22]. The contralateral hip can be pinned prophylactically. The indications for this include pain on the contralateral side, SCFE in a child younger than 10, history of endocrinopathy and high risk of inadequate follow-up.
Postoperative radiographs should be assessed for the position of the screw, ideally situated perpendicular to the physis and in the center of the femoral head. One potential complication is encroachment of the screw tip into the joint. Determining the position of the screw tip can be challenging [23]. Radiographs overestimate the distance between the screw tip and the subchondral bone, though frog lateral views are more accurate than AP views. Using CT as the gold standard, Senthi et al. [24] found that if the screw tip is within 4 mm of subchondral bone on frog lateral or 6 mm on AP view, the screw tip may be penetrating the cortex (Fig. 7).
Another potential complication is screw impingement, when the screw head impacts on the acetabular rim with hip flexion, injuring the acetabulum and labrum. Clinically, this is associated with limitation in flexion. Using cadaveric models, Goodwin et al. [25] found that when the screw head was medial to the intertrochanteric line on AP view, there was high risk of impingement, with little risk when the screw head was lateral (Fig. 8).
After pin fixation, continued growth at the physis can lead to less purchase of the distal screw or pin in the epiphysis, referred to as “growing off” the pin. This decreases stability of the fixation and can cause slip progression (Fig. 9) [26].
Osteotomies
Proximal femoral osteotomies might be performed in SCFE to improve orientation of the femoral head. They can be done at the time of original surgery or subsequent to in situ screw fixation to address ongoing symptoms. Surgical techniques are divided by the level of the osteotomy.
Proximal metaphyseal osteotomy is known as a cuneiform osteotomy, with a wedge of bone removed from the metaphysis, allowing realignment of the epiphysis, followed by screw fixation. It has the greatest potential for anatomical realignment of the femoral head because it is performed at the level of the SCFE deformity; however, it also has the highest risk of avascular necrosis (Fig. 10) [1].
Base of femoral neck osteotomy is a wedge osteotomy performed at the base of the femoral neck; both the osteotomy site and the slipped femoral head epiphysis are then fixed with pins. This has a decreased rate of avascular necrosis (AVN) compared to the cuneiform osteotomy, but only 35–55° of correction is possible. It also shortens the femoral neck, increasing the risks of leg-length discrepancy as well as impingement of the greater trochanter on the lateral acetabulum with hip abduction [1].
Intertrochanteric osteotomy was originally described by Southwick. This osteotomy is performed with removal of an anterolateral wedge of bone and then flexion abduction and internal rotation of the distal fragment followed by fixation of the osteotomy and the SCFE. There is no risk of avascular necrosis. The intertrochanteric osteotomy allows for up to 45° of correction AP and 60° lateral. Like the femoral neck osteotomy, it causes shortening with risk of leg-length discrepancy (Fig. 11) [1].
Because the deformity of SCFE occurs at the level of the physis, surgical correction targeted to this area has the potential for greater correction but also carries higher rates of complication, specifically AVN and chondrolysis [27, 28]. A relatively new surgery to improve the femoral head-neck relationship in cases of moderate and severe SCFE is the modified Dunn osteotomy. In this technique, the hip is surgically dislocated via greater trochanter osteotomy, then the femoral neck is thinned using a subperiosteal dissection. This leaves the important arterial supply to the femoral head intact and decreases the risk of AVN. The femoral head is reduced and fixed with screws, followed by relocation of the hip, and screw fixation of the greater trochanter osteotomy (Fig. 12) [29, 30].
Postoperative radiographs of screw fixation and osteotomy procedures should be assessed for evidence of hardware fracture, loosening and non-union (Figs. 13 and 14).
Complications
AVN
This serious complication of SCFE occurs secondary to injury of the arterial supply of the femoral head. The medial circumflex artery, a branch of the deep femoral artery, gives rise to superior retinacular vessels, which form the lateral epiphyseal arteries (LEAs) [31]. The LEAs enter the femoral head in the posterosuperior quadrant before anastomosing with vessels from the ligamentum teres. Injury in this location can compromise vascularity to the weight-bearing surface of the femoral head [32].
Damage to the arterial supply of the femoral head can occur at the time of the slip. Angiographic studies have shown that in some patients with unstable slip, reduction of the femoral head can improve its perfusion [19]. Other potential risk factors for AVN include severity of the slip, younger age of patient or shorter duration of symptoms (which could reflect increased physeal instability) [33–35].
Potential treatment/iatrogenic risk factors include reduction of the slip, particularly over-reduction of an acute slip or attempted reduction of a chronic slip [1]. Poor screw placement in the important posterior/superior quadrant of the femoral head can lead to AVN. As previously stated, femoral osteotomies, in particular cuneiform osteotomies, also increase the risk of AVN.
Radionuclide bone scans performed within the first 2 weeks after surgery, preferably by the seventh day, are very sensitive for detection of AVN, with a 100% negative predictive value. Changes can be seen well before there is radiographic evidence of AVN [36]. Radiographic and CT changes of avascular necrosis include increased sclerosis of the femoral head, subchondral fracture, fragmentation and collapse of the epiphysis (Figs. 12 and 15). MRI can be used to evaluate femoral head vascularization before and after surgery to assess risk of AVN [37], though postoperative assessment can be challenging because of artifact from screw fixation (Fig. 15). As with femoral head AVN from other causes, surgical management includes femoral osteotomy, with severe cases going on to joint replacement.
Cartilage loss and femoral acetabular impingement
Articular cartilage damage in the hips following SCFE can occur soon after surgery because of chondrolysis, which is defined as joint space loss with cartilage thickness measuring 2 mm less than the contralateral hip or joint space width of 3 mm or less [38]. A major risk factor for chondrolysis is penetration of the screw tip into the joint space; however, other risk factors include severe slip and early osteotomy (Fig. 16) [38, 39].
Cartilage loss following SCFE can result from femoral acetabular impingement (FAI)—abnormal contact between the femoral neck and the acetabulum occurring during hip flexion and more pronounced with internal rotation [40]. FAI is thought to be a major mechanism for joint damage in stable SCFE [41]. Because of the abnormal position of the femoral head with resulting metaphyseal prominence and decreased offset at the femoral head-neck junction, SCFE carries an increased risk of femoral acetabular impingement, even in mild slips. In fact, some believe that subclinical SCFE might be a mechanism for formation of the cam deformity associated with FAI [42].
Direct, intraoperative observation of the hip in patients with SCFE has demonstrated that the metaphysis, which extends to or anterior to the femoral head, impinges on the superior medial acetabular rim, causing injury to the labrum [40]. Labral hypertrophy and degeneration has been seen in patients with chronic symptoms following SCFE [43]. With flexion, the prominent metaphysis enters the acetabulum causing damage to the acetabular cartilage surface, with no damage to the femoral head [40]. The acetabular cartilage loss is most common in the anterior/superior quadrant [43].
Articular cartilage of the hip is well-assessed with MRI for thinning, fissuring and focal defects, using conventional sequences including T2-W and proton-density images. There are also advanced cartilage imaging protocols including T2 mapping and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC). In T2 mapping, T2 relaxation time of cartilage is measured as an indicator of the organization of the collagen fiber network that makes up the cartilage matrix [44, 45]. DGEMRIC imaging is dependent on the decreased glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content of degenerated cartilage. Because GAG and gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DPTA) are negatively charged, an abnormally increased amount of intravenously administered contrast agent accumulates in diseased articular cartilage, resulting in a decrease in T1 relaxation time compared to normal cartilage. T1 maps can then be created, showing areas of cartilage degeneration [44].
In patients with FAI caused by prior SCFE, assessment with dGEMRIC can demonstrate damage to the acetabular cartilage anterosuperiorly, as well as labral tears (Fig. 17), even in cases with modest slips. Zilkens et al. [46] studied patients following in situ pinning of mild and moderate slips at a mean of 11 years after surgery. Even when radiographs showed no evidence of osteoarthritis, dGEMRIC showed evidence of cartilage damage at the lateral acetabulum [46]. Similarly using T2 and T2* mapping techniques, cartilage damage was seen in both symptomatic and asymptomatic SCFE patients compared to healthy volunteers [47]. Patients with FAI following SCFE might go on to open or arthroscopic osteochondroplasty for treatment, with trimming of the metaphyseal prominence (Fig. 17) [41].
Conclusion
Radiography remains the primary imaging modality for the diagnosis of SCFE; however, MR, CT and bone scintigraphy can provide earlier recognition of the disorder and its complications and facilitate surgical planning. Our understanding of the natural history as well as the long-term sequelae of treated SCFE has been substantially improved with advances in cross-sectional imaging technologies. A firm grasp of surgical procedures coupled with a multimodality imaging approach optimizes primary diagnosis, management and assessment of potential complications of this important condition.
References
Loder RT, Aronsson DD, Weinstein SL et al (2008) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Instr Course Lect 57:473–498
Klein A, Joplin RJ, Reidy JA et al (1952) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: early diagnosis and treatment facilitated by normal roentgenograms. J Bone Joint Surg Am 34:233–239
Green DW, Mogekwu N, Scher DM et al (2009) A modification of Klein’s line to improve sensitivity of the anterior-posterior radiograph in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 29:449–453
Billing L, Bogren HG, Wallin J (2002) Reliable X-ray diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis by combining the conventional and a new simplified geometrical method. Pediatr Radiol 32:423–430
Uglow MG, Clarke NM (2004) The management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:631–635
Steel HH (1986) The metaphyseal blanch sign of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:920–922
Loder RT, O'Donnell PW, Didelot WP et al (2006) Valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 26:594–600
Shea KG, Apel PJ, Hutt NA et al (2007) Valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis without posterior displacement: two case reports. J Pediatr Orthop B 16:201–203
Lalaji A, Umans H, Schneider R et al (2002) MRI features of confirmed “pre-slip” capital femoral epiphysis: a report of two cases. Skeletal Radiol 31:362–365
Umans H, Liebling MS, Moy L et al (1998) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a physeal lesion diagnosed by MRI, with radiographic and CT correlation. Skeletal Radiol 27:139–144
Tins B, Cassar-Pullicino V, McCall I (2009) The role of pre-treatment MRI in established cases of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Eur J Radiol 70:570–578
Cohen MS, Gelberman RH, Griffin PP et al (1986) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: assessment of epiphyseal displacement and angulation. J Pediatr Orthop 6:259–264
Castriota-Scanderbeg A, Orsi E (1993) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: ultrasonographic findings. Skeletal Radiol 22:191–193
Terjesen T (1992) Ultrasonography for diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Comparison with radiography in 9 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 63:653–657
Loder RT, Richards BS, Shapiro PS et al (1993) Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the importance of physeal stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1134–1140
Southwick WO (1967) Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49:807–835
Loder RT, Aronsson DD, Dobbs MB et al (2001) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Instr Course Lect 50:555–570
Boles CA, el-Khoury GY (1997) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Radiographics 17:809–823
Maeda S, Kita A, Funayama K et al (2001) Vascular supply to slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 21:664–667
Parsch K, Weller S, Parsch D (2009) Open reduction and smooth Kirschner wire fixation for unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 29:1–8
de Sanctis N, Di Gennaro G, Pempinello C et al (1996) Is gentle manipulative reduction and percutaneous fixation with a single screw the best management of acute and acute-on-chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis? A report of 70 patients. J Pediatr Orthop B 5:90–95
Seller K, Wild A, Westhoff B et al (2006) Radiological evaluation of unstable (acute) slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated by pinning with Kirschner wires. J Pediatr Orthop B 15:328–334
Lehman WB, Menche D, Grant A et al (1984) The problem of evaluating in situ pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an experimental model and a review of 63 consecutive cases. J Pediatr Orthop 4:297–303
Senthi S, Blyth P, Metcalfe R et al (2011) Screw placement after pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a postoperative CT scan study. J Pediatr Orthop 31:388–392
Goodwin RC, Mahar AT, Oswald TS et al (2007) Screw head impingement after in situ fixation in moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 27:319–325
Givon U, Bowen JR (1999) Chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis: treatment by pinning in situ. J Pediatr Orthop B 8:216–222
Biring GS, Hashemi-Nejad A, Catterall A (2006) Outcomes of subcapital cuneiform osteotomy for the treatment of severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis after skeletal maturity. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1379–1384
Akkari M, Santili C, Braga SR et al (2010) Trapezoidal bony correction of the femoral neck in the treatment of severe acute-on-chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Arthroscopy 26:1489–1495
Ziebarth K, Zilkens C, Spencer S et al (2009) Capital realignment for moderate and severe SCFE using a modified Dunn procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:704–716
Huber H, Dora C, Ramseier LE et al (2011) Adolescent slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated by a modified Dunn osteotomy with surgical hip dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:833–838
Shore BJ, Millis MB, Kim YJ (2012) Vascular safe zones for surgical dislocation in children with healed Legg-Calve-Perthes disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:721–727
Brodetti A (1960) The blood supply to the femoral neck and head in relation to the damaging effects of nails and screws. J Bone Joint Surg Br 42:794–801
Sankar WN, McPartland TG, Millis MB et al (2010) The unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: risk factors for osteonecrosis. J Pediatr Orthop 30:544–548
Palocaren T, Holmes L, Rogers K et al (2010) Outcome of in situ pinning in patients with unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: assessment of risk factors associated with avascular necrosis. J Pediatr Orthop 30:31–36
Tokmakova KP, Stanton RP, Mason DE (2003) Factors influencing the development of osteonecrosis in patients treated for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:798–801
Fragniere B, Chotel F, Vargas Barreto B et al (2001) The value of early postoperative bone scan in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop B 10:51–55
Staatz G, Honnef D, Kochs A et al (2007) Evaluation of femoral head vascularization in slipped capital femoral epiphysis before and after cannulated screw fixation with use of contrast-enhanced MRI: initial results. Eur Radiol 17:163–168
Jofe MH, Lehman W, Ehrlich MG (2004) Chondrolysis following slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop B 13:29–31
Ingram AJ, Clarke MS, Clarke CS Jr et al (1982) Chondrolysis complicating slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 165:99–109
Leunig M, Casillas MM, Hamlet M et al (2000) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: early mechanical damage to the acetabular cartilage by a prominent femoral metaphysis. Acta Orthop Scand 71:370–375
Millis MB, Novais EN (2011) In situ fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis: perspectives in 2011. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(Suppl 2):46–51
Fraitzl CR, Kafer W, Nelitz M et al (2007) Radiological evidence of femoroacetabular impingement in mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a mean follow-up of 14.4 years after pinning in situ. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1592–1596
Sink EL, Zaltz I, Heare T et al (2010) Acetabular cartilage and labral damage observed during surgical hip dislocation for stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 30:26–30
Blankenbaker DG, Tuite MJ (2011) MR imaging of early hip joint degeneration. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 19:365–378
Jazrawi LM, Alaia MJ, Chang G et al (2011) Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:420–429
Zilkens C, Miese F, Bittersohl B et al (2011) Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC), after slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Eur J Radiol 79:400–406
Miese FR, Zilkens C, Holstein A et al (2011) Assessment of early cartilage degeneration after slipped capital femoral epiphysis using T2 and T2* mapping. Acta Radiol 52:106–110
Disclaimer
The authors have no financial interests, investigational or off-label uses to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jarrett, D.Y., Matheney, T. & Kleinman, P.K. Imaging SCFE: diagnosis, treatment and complications. Pediatr Radiol 43 (Suppl 1), 71–82 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2577-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2577-x