Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this communication is to highlight the shortcomings of all currently used imaging criteria in diagnosing or excluding malrotation and offer ultrasound demonstration of the 3rd portion of the duodenum (D3) between the AO and the SMA in transverse and sagittal plains as the most reliable diagnostic method.
Background
Although UGI is currently considered to be the imaging modality of choice in diagnosis of malrotations, numerous publications indicate that in certain patients, false positives and negatives can be encountered.
Materials and Methods
The material consists of more than 10 years experience in university settings, during which the author has used US as the definitive imaging modality for the work-up of malrotation. High resolution linear transducers (5-17 MHz) are the transducers of choice.
Imaging Plains:
-
A.
Transverse
With gradual grading compression, the following landmarks are illustrated in cehaplocaudad directions in the fallowing order.
-
The junction of splenic vein with the SMV portal vein.
-
The cross sections of SMA and SMV that may either be situated in midline, or to the right or the left of the midline.
-
Left renal vein crossing the spine from left to right between the AO and the SMA.
-
The jejunal vein, often coming from left, transversing between the AO and the SMA.
-
The transverse portion of the duodenum, D3, between the AO & the SMA
-
-
B.
Sagittal
-
D3 between vertically oriented SMA-SMV and the AO.
-
If SMA is not aligned with the AO by slight compression on the right or the left side of the abdomen, it will be aligned (depending on leftward or rightward position of SMA-SMV in axial plain).
-
Vertical orientation of SMA and SMV if they have an anteroposterior orientation.
-
-
C.
Coronal
-
Side by side orientation of SMA and SMV if they don’t have an anteroposterior orientation.
-
Results
In overwhelming majority of cases, by illustrating a retromesenteric D3 malrotation and, therefore, midgut volvulus were excluded.
Discussion
None of the current imaging criteria addresses the following most fundamental anatomic and embryologic facts regarding the gut rotation and fixation.
-
In first trimester, the D3 is secured in retroperitoneal space after the embryologic journey comes to an end, making the duodenum immune of midgut volvulus.
-
The surgical pathology of malrotation-midgut volvulus indicates that D3 is always Intraperitoneal and has not reached its final embryologic destination in retroperitoneal space.
-
Demonstrating a retromesenteric D3, therefore, indicates that the embryologic journey is completed and the patient does not have malrotation.
-
Excluding malrotation excludes the likelihood of midgut volvus.
Conclusion
The position of the DJJ, the configuration of the duodenal sweep, the orientation of the mesenteric vessels are all wrong horses to bet on because none of them addresses the fundamental anatomic and embryologic facts. Only the cross-sectional imaging, US, CT and MRI can prove that the D3 is retromesenteric, therefore, excluding malrotation and volvulus. Therefore, demonstrating a retromesenteric duodenum is the reference standard of imaging in the work-up of malrotation, not any other previously published criteria. The US imaging is the most acceptable imaging method for malrotation work-up, in the spirit of ALARA principle and “Image Gently” campaign.
Article PDF
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Rescorla FJ, Shedd FJ, Grosfeld JL, Vane DW, West KW (1990) Anomalies of intestinal rotation in childhood: analysis of 447 cases. Surgery 108(4):710–715
Dilley AV, Pereira J, Shi ECP, Adams S, Kern IB, Currie B, Henry GM (2000) The radiologist says malrotation: does the surgeon operate. Pediatr Surg Int 16:45–49
Berdon WE, Baker DH, Bull S et al (1970) Midgut malrotation and volvulus. Radiology 96:375–383
Applegate KE, Anderson JM, Klatte EC (2006) Intestinal malrotation in children: A problem-solving approach to the upper gastrointestinal series. RadioGraphics 26:1485–1500
Long FR, Kramer SS, Markowitz RI, Taylor GE, Liacouras CA (1996) Intestinal malrotation in children: Tutorial on radiographic diagnosis in difficult cases. Radiology 198:775–780
Strouse PJ (2004) Disorders of intestinal rotation and fixation (“malrotation”). Pediatr Radiol 34:837–851
Blachar A, Federle MP, Brancatelli G, Peterson MS, Oliver JH, Li W (2001) Radiologist performance in the diagnosis of internal hernia by using specific CT findings with emphasis on transmesenteric hernia. Radiology 221:422
Benya EC, Ben-Ami TE, Whitington PF, Alonso EM, Millis JM, Yousefzadeh DK (1998) Duodenum and duodenal-jejunal junction in children: position and appearance after liver transplantation. Radiology 207:233–236
Katz ME, Siegel MJ, Shackelford GD, McAlister WH (1987) The position and mobility of the duodenum in children. AJR 148:947–951
Yousefzadeh DK, Soper RT, Jackson JH (1980) Diagnostic advantages of manual compression fluoroscopy in the radiologic work-up of vomiting neonates. J Pediatr Surg 15(3):270–278
Lim-Dunham JE, Ben-Ami TE, Yousefzadeh DK (1999) Manual epigastric compression during upper gastrointestinal examination of neonates: value in diagnosis of intestinal malrotation and volvulus. AJR 173:979–983
Millar AJW, Rode H, Brown RA, Cywes S (1987) The deadly vomit: malrotation and midget volvulus. A review of 137 cases. Pediatr Surg Int 2:172–174
Loyer E, Eggli KD (1989) Sonographic evaluation of superior mesenteric vascular relationship in malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 19:173–175
Dufour D, Delaet MH, Dassonville M, Cadranel S, Perlmutter N (1992) Midgut malrotation, the reliability of sonographic diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 22:21–23
Orzech N, Navarro OM, Langer JC (2006) Is ultrasonography a good screening test for intestinal malrotation. J Pediatr Surg 41(5):1005–1009
Sze RW, Guillerman P, Krauter D, Evans AS (2002) Case reports. A possible new ancillary sign for diagnosing midgut volvulus: the truncated superior mesenteric artery. J Ultrasound Med 21(4):477–480
Patino MO, Munden MM (2004) Utility of the sonographic whirlpool sign in diagnosing midgut volvulus in patients with atypical clinical presentations. J Ultrasound Med 23:397–401
Shimanuki Y, Aihara T, Takano H, Moritani T et al (1996) Clockwise whirlpool sign at color Doppler US: An objective and definite sign of midgut volvulus. Radiology 199(1):261–264
Pracros JP, Sann L, Genin G, Tran-Minh VA et al (1992) Ultrasound diagnosis of midgut volvulus: the “whirlpool” sign. Pediatr Radiol 22:18–20
Yeh WC, Wang HP, Chen C, Wang HH, Wu MS, Lin JT (1999) Preoperative sonographic diagnosis of midgut malrotation with volvulus in adults: the “whirlpool” sign. J Clinical US 27(5):279–283
Hsu CY, Chiba Y, Fukui O, Sasaki Y, Miyashita S (2004) Counterclockwise barber-pole sign on prenatal three-dimensional power Doppler sonography in a case of duodenal obstruction without intestinal malrotation. J Clinical US 32(2):86–90
Paul C, Lynne R (2005) Counterclockwise barber-pole sign on CT: SMA/SMV variance without midgut Malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 35:1125–1127
Ashley LM, Allen S, Teele RL (2001) A normal sonogram does not exclude malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 31:354–356
Aidlen J, Anupindi SA, Jaramillo D, Doody DP (2005) Malrotation with midgut volvulus: CT findings of bowel infarction. Pediatr Radiol 35:529–531
Zissin R, Osadchy A, Gayer G, Sharpiro-Feinberg M (2002) Pictorial Review CT of duodenal pathology. The Brit J Radiol 75:78–84
Zissin R, Rathaus V, Oscadchy A, Kots E, Gayer G, Shapiro-Feinberg M (1999) Intestinal malrotation as an incidental finding on CT in adults. Abdom Imaging 24:550–555
Boudiaf M, Soyer P, Terem C et al (2001) CT evaluation of small bowel obstruction. RadioGraphics 21:613–624
Jayaraman MV, Mayo-Smith WW, Movson S, Dupuy DE, Wallach MT (2001) CT of the duodenum: an overlooked segment gets its due. RadioGraphics 21:S147–S160
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dr. Yousefzadeh has indicated that he has no relevant financial relationships or potential conflicts or interest related to the material presented.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yousefzadeh, D.K. The position of the duodenojejunal junction: the wrong horse to bet on in diagnosing or excluding malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 39 (Suppl 2), 172–177 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1116-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-1116-2