Abstract
The discovery of fetal skeletal abnormality on prenatal US mandates an extended study of the fetus. This extended examination includes specific views and measurements of the fetal skeleton. Lethality can be predicted if severe pulmonary hypoplasia is present. Specific diagnosis of a fetal osteochondrodysplasia is difficult; a collaborative approach among obstetric, neonatal and genetic services is necessary to provide the parents with all available information regarding the pregnancy. Pediatric radiologists who have experience in radiologic assessment of osteochondrodystrophies of infants and children can provide expertise in this area.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Pediatric radiologists have the training and experience to bridge the border between prenatal and postnatal imaging. They can be a link among obstetricians, pediatricians and pediatric surgeons, and provide guidance for further imaging when a fetal anomaly is detected [1]. Because of their knowledge of the radiographic evaluation of osteochondrodysplasias in infants and children, pediatric radiologists can act as a resource in those rare situations where the fetus is found to have abnormal bones on US. This guide to the evaluation of the fetal skeleton reinforces reviews published in Pediatric Radiology by Lachman in 1994 [2] and Avni et al., in 1996 [3]. It is updated from a presentation given at the Postgraduate Course of ESPR in Dublin, 2005.
What is osteochondrodysplasia?
From a radiologic perspective, osteochondrodysplasia (or the more familiar but looser term, skeletal dysplasia), refers to one or more of the following: abnormal length of bones; abnormal shape of bones; abnormal number of bones; and abnormal density of bones. From a geneticist’s viewpoint, each osteochondrodysplasia is the result of an abnormal cellular product or process, which in turn results from a defective chromosome. In the most recent classification, disorders of the skeleton have been divided into seven groups based on their known molecular-pathogenetic etiologies (Table 1) [4].
The disease that we know as osteogenesis imperfecta is a good example of a defect in an extracellular structural protein, specifically collagen. Although we think of collagen as a single entity, it is a family of 19 or more different molecules [5]. Furthermore, each collagen molecule is a triple-stranded helical structure—a rope formed by tightly twisted alpha chains, of which 25 have been identified. Each alpha chain is encoded by a separate gene. Collagen is secreted into the extracellular matrix, typically by a fibroblast, where it makes up 25% of our total mass of protein [6]. A defect in the genes encoding the alpha 1 and alpha 2 chains of type 1 collagen (the most common and distributed in skin and bone) causes the clinical phenotypes of osteogenesis imperfecta [7].
When there is a defect in the gene that sends out instructions for manufacture of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3), the result might be one of several dysplasias, including thanatophoric dysplasia, achondroplasia, and some of the craniosynostoses [4]. There is not a direct, tidy correlation between genetic defect and clinical phenotype in all cases, indicating that other moderating factors are involved. As more research has been done on skeletal dysplasias, more overlap has resulted. For example, there is a radiographic division between type I and type II thanatophoric dysplasia, where clover leaf skull is the major differentiating feature. However, in a report from Zurich, the same mutation in the FGFR3 gene was identified in two patients, one with type I and the other with type II thanatophoric dysplasia [8].
There are approximately 200 disorders of skeletal growth and development [4]. Their names have been derived from their appearance, e.g. osteogenesis imperfecta (Latin) and diastrophic dysplasia (Greek), from the presumed etiologic flaw, e.g. achondroplasia, or from the authorship of early publications, e.g. Rubenstein Taybi syndrome. Not all dysplasias are associated with short bones, and use of the term “dwarfism” is disappearing from medical literature. “Thanatophoric dysplasia”, which has replaced “thanatophoric dwarfism”, is a case in point. The mixed nomenclature and classification has been confusing and in some cases misleading. With the ongoing discoveries in cell biology, a review of osteochondrodysplasias was initiated in 2001. This resulted in publication of “The International Nomenclature of Constitutional Disorders of Bone” [9, 10].
Prenatal diagnosis
There are four salient points regarding prenatal diagnosis of skeletal disorders:
-
1)
The prenatal recognition of skeletal abnormality is almost always achieved with US alone. If used at all, radiography and MRI have ancillary roles. The role of MRI might expand in the future. The gestational age of the fetus, the size of the mother in terms of adequacy of scans, the fetal lie, equipment used, and experience and expertise on the part of the examiner are all variables in obstetric US. An ultrasonographer working full-time for 50 weeks every year and doing only obstetric scanning of pregnant patients at 18–20 weeks' gestation in a community practice might encounter one fetus affected by a skeletal dysplasia in two years. In fact, an ultrasonographer would probably miss diagnosing the most common of skeletal dysplasias, achondroplasia, because the short bones of achondroplasia typically become obvious in mid- or late second trimester—after routine scanning is performed. Overall prevalence of skeletal dysplasias was calculated to be 2.4/10,000 deliveries in one large study [11], but the incidence varies with the population.
-
2)
Skeletal dysplasias can be classified as lethal or nonlethal (Table 2). Lethality is caused by pulmonary hypoplasia from an abnormally formed, therefore restrictive, thorax [12–16]. Severe micromelia refers to long bones that are four or more standard deviations below the mean for gestational age. This finding is characteristic of thanatophoric dysplasia, achondrogenesis, and osteogenesis imperfecta type II, all of which are lethal. The discovery of a lethal skeletal dysplasia might result in the family electing to terminate the pregnancy. In other cases where the dysplasia might not be lethal by virtue of pulmonary hypoplasia but would lead to suffering and poor quality of life for the child, the family might also elect to terminate the pregnancy. Therefore, depending on the society in which one practices, the number of living children affected by skeletal dysplasia might vary [11].
-
3)
Differential diagnoses of skeletal dysplasias that are encountered in prenatal imaging only roughly match those seen in pediatric practice. For example, neurofibromatosis, multiple exostoses, and Marfan syndrome are diagnosed after the neonatal period. Prenatal diagnosis is skewed toward syndromes that present on US with obvious shortening or malformation of bone, in particular the femur, which is imaged on every scan as part of biometric assessment.
-
4)
Consultation of radiologist/ultrasonologist with geneticist, neonatologist and pathologist is crucial in arriving at a diagnosis or, in some cases, a list of possible diagnoses for an affected patient. When the patient is a fetus, discussion can occur at a fetal medicine panel after consultants review the clinical details of the pregnancy and the images of an abnormal fetus. Only 48–65% of specific diagnoses are correct; however, the identification of a lethal dysplasia is highly accurate [13, 14]. If a pregnancy is terminated or if a fetus or neonate dies, formal review of the case must occur with presentation of postmortem clinical evaluation, postmortem imaging, and pathologic examination when available. The family gets the best medical care and appropriate genetic counseling when such processes are in place. Through such a review, the consulting services involved in diagnosis and treatment add to their base of knowledge. High-resolution postmortem radiographs, such as those available with Faxitron (General Science X-ray, Wheeling, Ill.), or mammographic film are ideal. Anteroposterior and lateral views of the fetus are the minimum required. Published normal standards are available for comparison [17]. When pathologic examination is declined by the family, postmortem US is useful for evaluation of intraabdominal and intracranial contents; in relevant situations it might add information regarding morphology of cartilage columns in the epiphyses. Postmortem MRI is best suited to the evaluation of craniospinal neuroanatomy [18], but as experience in the technique increases it might play a greater role, particularly in the evaluation of cartilage [19].
How is an antenatal diagnosis made?
If there are family members who have a known osteochondrodysplasia and if the parents are willing to pursue investigation, a fetus can be scanned with US early and often in the pregnancy. It is worth re-emphasizing that many dysplasias do not become apparent in the fetus until the third trimester, after birth, or well into childhood [10]. Therefore, genetic testing via chorionic villous sampling or amniocentesis can be done if requested and if available for the particular dysplasia. There must be coordination between the genetics and scanning departments in this regard.
Most diagnoses of skeletal anomaly are made in the absence of any family history. Of prenatally diagnosed dysplasias, 90% or more are the result of new spontaneous mutations or the appearance of recessive disease carried by phenotypically normal parents [12].
A fetus affected by a skeletal dysplasia might be identified by virtue of having an abnormally thick nuchal translucency on screening scans performed during a window from 11 to 14 weeks' gestational age [20]. With widespread use of such screening, early diagnosis of the severe dysplasias might increase. In such cases, it is likely that nuchal thickening reflects an abnormal extracellular matrix [21, 22].
Guidelines for assessment of a fetus with possible skeletal dysplasia
Standard measurements acquired at screening obstetric US include biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femoral length (FL). Comparison of these values with standardized measurements based on known gestational age (from last menstrual period or first trimester scan), allows assessment of normal versus abnormal biometry. The discovery of short or malformed femurs or other bones mandates completion of the routine US examination of the fetus and the addition of measurements that are not standard. This extended examination of the fetal skeleton follows completion of the routine scan, which includes evaluation of brain, heart and abdominal contents according to specific guidelines. Assessment of fetal gender is not routine but should be included when a skeletal abnormality is detected. This can be very useful information in certain situations, e.g. gender reversal of males, present in camptomelic dysplasia [22]. Both the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine [23] and the Australian Society of Ultrasound in Medicine have guidelines listed on their websites [24].
When an extended examination is necessary, the parent(s) should be told that the examination will be longer than usual and alerted to the fact that measurements of many bones will be performed. It is the duty of the examiner to explain the need for further information in as calm and gentle a manner as possible. Careful, compulsive examination, identification, and measurement of bones must follow. An interim discussion with the parents after scanning is complete can be followed by a more detailed conversation with the family after there has been consultation with perinatal specialists. Additional views required for an extended skeletal examination are listed in Table 3 and discussed below.
Length of all long bones: femur, humerus, ulna, radius, tibia and fibula
The diaphysis is measured in its long axis with care to avoid obliquity, which would cause apparent decrease in length. The epiphysis, whether cartilaginous or ossified, is excluded. Both femurs should be measured. A single short femur is more likely to be focal femoral dysplasia or an isolated anomaly rather than part of a generalized skeletal dysplasia. Femur length should equal foot length in the normal fetus [25] (Fig. 1). Tibia and fibula have to be differentiated based on their position relative to the knee. The ulna extends more proximally than does the radius; distal ulna and radius should end at the same level. Radial ray anomalies might be syndromic but might be part of the VACTERL association [26]. Standards for lengths of long bones are available in textbooks, from manufacturers of US equipment by inclusion as software, and on the Internet. The values from different authors differ slightly; it is reasonable to pick one standard and use it in all cases while remembering that individuals of some ethnic groups are typically short. Reports should document the standards used. The site of shortening helps narrow the differential diagnosis; categories include micromelia (entire limb), rhizomelia (humerus, femur), mesomelia (radius/ulna, tibia/fibula), acromelia (hands, feet).
Mineralization of long bones is very difficult to assess with US. The bones, even if consisting of poorly mineralized tissue, still act as reflective surfaces to the US beam. Detection of both cortical surfaces on a single scan indicates under-mineralization as does lack of distinct posterior shadowing (Fig. 2).
Sagittal and coronal views of long bones
Ultrasonographers tend to forget that bones need evaluation in at least two orthogonal planes in order to characterize their shape. “Bent” bones might be fractured, e.g. osteogenesis imperfecta, or dysplastic, e.g. campomelic (camptomelic) dysplasia. It is often difficult to accurately assess bones from the distal limbs in two orthogonal planes.
Transverse view of the clavicles with measurement of length
The clavicle is the first bone to ossify in the fetus [17] and the last to fuse its epiphysis in the adolescent or young adult [27]. Clavicular growth is normally 1 mm/week gestational age [28]. Cleidocranial dysplasia is the obvious syndrome associated with short or dysplastic clavicles.
Sagittal views and measurement of the scapulae
The scapula is hypoplastic in campomelic dysplasia [29]. It might be smaller than normal in syndromes where all bones are small for gestational age, such as hypochondrogenesis. It is high-riding with segmentation anomalies of the cervical spine (Klippel Feil/Sprengel deformity) [30].
Length and shape of ribs
The ribs should extend around two-thirds of the circumference of the thoracic cavity. Published normal standards are available [31]. Short ribs are associated with thanataphoric dysplasia (Fig. 1), Jeune thoracic dysplasia and the short rib-polydactyly syndromes, among others [32]. Ribs should be smooth in contour. Irregular, beaded ribs are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta (Fig. 3). As with long bones, the angulation and beading of ribs might be appreciated in one plane but not another.
Thoracic circumference/abdominal circumference
The measurement of thoracic circumference should be at the level of the four-chamber view of the heart and around the ribs [13, 33, 34]. The ratio of thoracic-to-abdominal circumference should be 80–100% [14] (Fig. 1). Lower values indicate the presence of pulmonary hypoplasia. There is often considerable inter- and intraobserver variation for this measurement, and several should be obtained. Midsagittal view of the fetal chest and abdomen provides a subjective impression of the degree of thoracic hypoplasia when present.
Axial and sagittal views of the feet with measurement of foot lengths
Talipes and rocker bottom foot can be diagnosed prenatally. However, scans in late pregnancy are less reliable because fetal positioning might result in pseudotalipes. In normal fetuses, the length of the foot will equal the length of the femur [25].
Number of digits of hands and feet, if possible
Persistently clenched hands are abnormal and indicate probable neurologic and/or chromosomal abnormality. Partially opened hands are adequate for counting digits, but an open hand is best. A small accessory digit might be completely missed. Also, absent first metacarpal or other subtle radial ray anomaly might be undetectable. Counting toes is much more difficult than counting fingers. Three-dimensional (3-D) US has a role here [32]. Discovery of polydactyly directs the differential diagnosis toward trisomy 13, short rib polydactyly syndromes, chondroectodermal dysplasia and Meckel Gruber syndrome.
Sagittal, transverse, and coronal views of the spine
As with evaluation of long bones, US views of the vertebral elements are reflective only. Each vertebra should have three ossification centers obvious on US. A sagittal view of the spine provides a relative measure of bony vertebral center compared to its enveloping cartilage and adjacent disc space. Platyspondyly can be diagnosed when there is obvious widening between vertebral ossification centers. Defective ossification of vertebral bodies is typical of achondrogenesis/hypochondrogenesis [35, 36] (Fig. 2). The contour of the spine and the presence of soft-tissue abnormality/defect should be noted. Persistent tail is a feature of metatropic dysplasia [37].
Profile and coronal views of the face with 3-D view if available
Micrognathia can be assessed on direct sagittal views of the face, as can frontal bossing. Hypo/hypertelorism is established based on orbital measurements and comparison with standards. The rule of three is known by artists and helpful to sonographers: in normal facial proportions, there is space for a third eye between the other two. The geneticist and pediatric pathologist can often use information from the contours of the face to aid with diagnosis (Figs. 4 and 5), and 3-D US is particularly helpful in this regard [38]. Fetal position is key to acquiring the data needed for good 3-D reconstructions. Prone position and arms and hands over the face do not allow diagnostic images. Four-dimensional (4-D) US—3-D with the added dimension of realtime imaging—is likely to be even more revealing [39]. Aneuploidy is frequently associated with stereotypical facies.
Skull: shape, sutures, softness
By virtue of the typical position of a fetus, the skull is usually evaluated in transverse plane. A skilled sonographer can usually recognize an unusual shape. A cloverleaf skull, or kleeblatschadel, is associated with thanataphoric dysplasia type II. The frontal bossing associated with achondroplasia is best identified on sagittal view of the face and anterior skull. Clear identification of intracranial structures (particularly in the near field where reverberation usually obscures detail) is a sign of decreased ossification, typically associated with osteogenesis imperfecta or hypophosphatasia (Fig. 3). Also, gentle pressure with the examining transducer can flatten the abnormally ossified skull. Three-dimensional US has been used in assessing shape and sutural anatomy [40].
Caveats
Children tend to resemble their parents. A short mother and father are likely to have a short baby who is perfectly normal.
Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) can be severe enough that the fetal skeleton lags far behind the normal in growth and development. Short limbs and delayed ossification centers can result and mimic skeletal dysplasia in utero. Symmetric growth restriction can result from chromosomal anomaly or early intrauterine infection. Asymmetric IUGR (relative sparing of head with abdominal and soft-tissue restriction of growth from poor intrauterine nutrition) usually becomes apparent in the second trimester, after 24 weeks. Sequential measurements on growth charts are useful in the diagnosis, particularly if there are early scans as a baseline. There is typically other evidence such as maternal hypertension, uterine anomaly or large fibroid(s), abnormal placental perfusion as demonstrated by abnormal Doppler examination of uterine arteries, oligohydramnios or elevated umbilical artery Doppler to indicate that the fetus is failing to thrive because of lack of nutrition. But this is not always the case, and a false-positive diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia might be assigned to the fetus [41].
Any mother who has a fetus with abnormal bones needs a review of her medical history and careful questioning of intake of medications or other substances. Teratogens associated with skeletal dysplasia are warfarin [42], glucose (uncontrolled maternal diabetes mellitus, type 1 or 2) [43], alcohol [44], phenylalanine (maternal phenylketonuria) [45], and thalidomide, which is now being used for treatment of leprosy and other illnesses [46].
Aneuploidy is frequently associated with skeletal dysplasia (Table 4). In particular, Down syndrome might present with mildly short femurs and humeri and no other discernable anomaly. Maternal age is an important factor. Punctate epiphyseal calcifications are a hallmark of the chondrodysplasia punctata syndromes but are rarely obvious until the third trimester.
Of the 200 or more osteochondrodystrophies, the four most commonly diagnosed prenatally are thanataphoric dysplasia (Fig. 1), achondrogenesis (Fig. 2), osteogenesis imperfecta type II (Fig. 3), and achondroplasia (Figs. 4 and 5) (Table 5). Of these, only achondroplasia is a nonlethal skeletal dysplasia. As noted previously, the achondroplastic fetus typically is identified on a scan that is performed in the third trimester of pregnancy. Therefore, the diagnosis results from incidental discovery in most cases. However, because achondroplasia is the result of a more frequent genetic mutation compared to other dysplasias, it is among the most commonly diagnosed.
Conclusions
The discovery of osteochondrodysplasia in a fetus during routine screening US is an unusual occurrence. A careful, complete evaluation of the skeleton of the fetus with US should follow identification of one or more short bones. Most osteochondrodysplasias that are diagnosed prenatally fall into the four groups of thanataphoric dysplasia, osteogenesis imperfecta type II, achondroplasia, and achondrogenesis. Specific diagnosis may not be possible prenatally, but a lethal skeletal dysplasia can be identified with confidence.
Preliminary discussion of findings with parents should follow directly after scanning; it is wise to avoid specific diagnostic labels unless absolutely certain. Use all textbooks, journal articles and Internet resources available. Cellular biology is advancing rapidly, with the direct consequence of uncovering the causes of osteochondrodysplasias and, sometimes, changing their names.
Consultation with clinicians from other services, specifically obstetrics, neonatology, and genetics, should be scheduled. A Fetal Medicine Panel fulfills this role on a routine basis. Consideration of other imaging such as 3-D or 4-D views [47], radiography, and MRI depends on the US findings.
Further readings
Textbooks and websites as resources
Callen PW (ed) (2000) Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology, 4th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia
Nyberg D, McGahan JP, Pretorius DH, et al (2002) Diagnostic imaging of fetal anomalies, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Taybi H, Lachman RS (1996) Radiology of syndromes, metabolic disorders and skeletal dysplasias, 4th edn. Mosby, St. Louis
http://www.ibis-birthdefects.org. Includes information regarding osteochondrodystrophies and links to other sites.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man: produced by Johns Hopkins and hosted by the National Library of Medicine in the USA
http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/. A service of the National Library of Medicine with information on gene-related disorders
http://www.emedicine.com/ped/topic625.htm. A pediatric and clinical overview of skeletal dysplasias with links to other articles
http://www.thefetus.net/index.php. An ultrasonographic teaching file of fetal anatomy, normal and abnormal
http://www.vh.org/pediatric/provider/pediatrics/Clinical Genetics/Contents.html. Provides instruction on basic genetics
http://www.encyclopedias.families.com. An excellent “lay” resource with information in plain English
References
Teele RL, Barth RA, Estroff J (2000) Perinatal radiology. Pediatr Radiol 30:1–2
Lachman RS (1994) Fetal imaging in the skeletal dysplasias: overview and experience. Pediatr Radiol 42:413–417
Avni EF, Rypens F, Zappa M, et al (1996) Antenatal diagnosis of short-limb dwarfism: sonographic approach. Pediatr Radiol 26:171–178
Superti-Furga A, Bonafe L, Rimoin DL (2001) Molecular-pathogenetic classification of genetic disorders of the skeleton. Am J Med Genet 106:282–293
Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, et al (1994) Molecular biology of the cell, 3rd edn. Garland Publishing, New York, NY, pp 978–981
Rauch F, Glorieux FH (2004) Osteogenesis imperfecta. Lancet 363:1377–1385
Kolble N, Sobetzko D, Ersch J, et al (2002) Diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia by multidisciplinary assessment: a report of two cases of thanatophoric dysplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:92–98
Hall CM (2002) International nosology and classification of constitutional disorders of bone (2001). Am J Med Genet 15(113):65–77 (PDF revised 2003 available from http://www.csmc.edu/3810.html)
Offiah AC, Hall CM (2003) Radiological diagnosis of the constitutional disorders of bone. As easy as A, B, C? Pediatr Radiol 33:153–161
Rasmussen SA, Bieber FR, Benacerraf BR, et al (1996) Epidemiology of osteochondrodysplasias: changing trends due to advances in prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet 61:49–58
Sharony R, Browne C, Lachman RS, et al (1993) Prenatal diagnosis of the skeletal dysplasias. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169:668–675
Tretter AE, Saunders RC, Meyers CM, et al (1998) Antenatal diagnosis of lethal skeletal dysplasias. Am J Med Genet 75:518–522
Parilla BV, Leeth EA, Kambich MP, et al (2003) Antenatal detection of skeletal dysplasias. J Ultrasound Med 22:255–258
Merz E, Miric-Tesanic D, Bahlmann F, et al (1999) Prenatal sonographic chest and lung measurements for predicting severe pulmonary hypoplasia. Prenat Diagn 19:614–619
Dugoff L, Coffin CT, Hobbins JC (1997) Sonographic measurement of the fetal rib cage perimeter to thoracic circumference ratio: application to prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 10:269–271
Schumacher R, Seaver LH, Spranger J (2004) Fetal radiology: a diagnostic atlas. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Griffiths PD, Paley MN, Whitby EH (2005) Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet 365:1271–1273
Suzumura H, Kohno T, Nishimura G, et al (2002) Prenatal diagnosis of hypochondrogenesis using fetal MRI: a case report. Pediatr Radiol 32:373–375
Souka AP, Von Kaisenberg CS, Hyett JA, et al (2005) Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1005–1021
Haak MC, van Vugt JM (2003) Pathophysiology of increased nuchal translucency: a review of the literature. Hum Reprod Update 9:175–184
Michel-Calemard L, Lesca G, Morel Y, et al (2004) Campomelic acampomelic dysplasia presenting with increased nuchal translucency in the first trimester. Prenat Diagn 24:519–523
Campbell J, Henderson A, Campbell S (1988) The fetal femur/foot length ratio: a new parameter to assess dysplastic limb reduction. Obstet Gynecol 72:181–184
Brons JT, van der Harten HJ, van Geijn HP, et al (1990) Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of radial-ray reduction malformations. Prenat Diagn 10:279–288
Schmeling A, Schulz R, Reisinger W, et al (2004) Studies on the time frame for ossification of the medial clavicular epiphyseal cartilage in conventional radiography. Int J Legal Med 118:5–8
Yarkoni S, Schmidt W, Jeanty P, et al (1985) Clavicular measurement: a new biometric parameter for fetal evaluation. J Ultrasound Med 4:467–470
Mortier GR, Rimoin DL, Lachman RS (1997) The scapula as a window to the diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias. Pediatr Radiol 27:447–451
Chinn DH (2001) Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of Sprengel’s deformity. J Ultrasound Med 20:693–697
Abuhamad AZ, Sedule-Murphy SJ, Kolm P, et al (1996) Prenatal ultrasonographic fetal rib length measurement: correlation with gestational age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7:193–196
Viora E, Sciarrone A, Bastonero S, et al (2002) Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of short-rib polydactyly syndrome type II in the second trimester: a case report. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:88–91
Johnson A, Callan NA, Bhutani VK, et al (1987) Ultrasonic ratio of fetal thoracic to abdominal circumference: an association with fetal pulmonary hypoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 57:764–769
Yoshimura S, Masuzaki H, Gotoh H, et al (1996) Ultrasonographic prediction of lethal pulmonary hypoplasia: comparison of eight different ultrasonographic parameters. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:477–483
Corsi A, Riminucci M, Fisher LW, et al (2001) Achondrogenesis type 1B: agenesis of cartilage interterritorial matrix as the link between gene defect and pathological skeletal phenotype. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:1375–1378
Delgado Carrasco J, Casanova Morcillo A, Zabalza Alvillos M, et al (2001) Achondrogenesis type II-hypochondrogenesis: radiological features. Case report (in Spanish). An Esp Pediatr 55:553–557
O’Sullivan MJ, McAllister WH, Ball RH, et al (1998) Morphologic observations in a case of lethal variant (type I) metatropic dysplasia with atypical features: morphology of lethal metatropic dysplasia. Pediatr Dev Pathol 1:405–412
Merz E, Welter C (2005) 2D and 3D ultrasound in the evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal anatomy in the second and third trimesters in a level III center. Ultraschall Med 26:9–16
Campbell S (2002) 4D or not 4D: that is the question. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:1–4
Pretorius DH, Nelson TR (1994) Prenatal visualization of cranial sutures and fontanelles with three-dimensional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 13:871–876
Pattarelli P, Pretorius DH, Edwards DK (1990) Intrauterine growth retardation mimicking skeletal dysplasia on antenatal sonography. J Ultrasound Med 9:737–739
Poznanski AK (1994) Punctate epiphyses: a radiological sign not a disease. Pediatr Radiol 24:418–424
Schaefer-Graf UM, Buchanan TA, Xiang A, et al (2001) Patterns of congenital anomalies and relationship to initial maternal fasting glucose levels in pregnancies complicated by type 2 and gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:313–320
Astley SJ, Clarren SK (1995) A fetal alcohol syndrome screening tool. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 19:1565–1571
Rouse B, Azen C, Koch R, et al (1997) Maternal Phenylketonuria Collaborative Study (MPKUCS) offspring: facial anomalies, malformations, and early neurological sequelae. Am J Med Genet 69:89–95
Lary JM, Daniel KL, Erickson JD, et al (1999) The return of thalidomide: can birth defects be prevented? Drug Saf 21:161–169
Garjian K, Pretorius DH, Budorick NE, et al (2000) Fetal skeletal dysplasia: three-dimensional US – initial experience. Radiology 214:717–723
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teele, R.L. A guide to the recognition of skeletal disorders in the fetus. Pediatr Radiol 36, 473–484 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-0087-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-0087-9