Abstract
Pediatric heart failure (HF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Medical treatment for pediatric HF is largely derived from adult studies. Previously, there has been no described use of dapagliflozin in pediatric HF patients. We describe our single-center experience using dapagliflozin in addition to standard HF medical therapy in 38 pediatric HF patients since January 2020. Median age was 12.2 years (interquartile range 6.2–17.5). Majority of patients had dilated cardiomyopathy (68.4%) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40% or less (65.8%). HF regimens commonly included sacubitril/valsartan, beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and loop diuretic. Median follow-up from dapagliflozin initiation for the whole cohort was 130 days (IQR 76–332). Median B-type natriuretic peptide decreased significantly from 222 to 166 pg/mL at latest clinical follow-up (P = .04). Estimated glomerular filtration rate trended lower at latest follow-up but was not significant from baseline. There were no clinically significant changes in blood chemistries or vital signs after initiation of dapagliflozin. No patients experienced symptomatic hypoglycemia or hypovolemia. Six patients (15.8%) experienced a symptomatic urinary tract infection necessitating antibiotic treatment. In a separate analysis of 16 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy who received dapagliflozin for a median of 313 days (IQR 191–414), median LVEF increased significantly from 32 to 37.2% (P = .006). Dapagliflozin, when added to a background of guideline-directed medical therapy, appears well tolerated in children with HF. Larger studies are needed to evaluate safety and efficacy of dapagliflozin in this population.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Pediatric heart failure (HF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in childhood, with in-hospital mortality rates of 7–26%, and high frequency of 30-day HF-related readmissions [1,2,3]. Clinical guidelines for management of pediatric HF are largely based on expert consensus and extrapolation from adult guidelines due to lower prevalence of HF in children and lack of clinical trials performed in this population [1, 2].
Dapagliflozin, an oral sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, is recommended as a component of guideline-directed medical therapy in adults with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) to reduce cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF [4]. This is the first description of dapagliflozin use in children treated for HF.
Methods
Study Population
We identified pediatric patients (< 21 years of age) with a diagnosis of HF who were initiated on dapagliflozin starting in January 2020. HF was defined by reduced ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction < 55% by echocardiography) or impaired ventricular filling (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure > 18 mmHg measured directly and/or E/e’ > 14 by echocardiography) with clinical features of congestion and/or low cardiac output. We administered dapagliflozin enterally at a target dose of 0.1–0.2 mg/kg once daily (maximum 10 mg) to patients already receiving standard HF medical therapy. Table 1 summarizes our center’s dapagliflozin protocol for monitoring parameters. We included all patients who received dapagliflozin for a minimum of 30 days in this analysis. Patients were followed until latest clinical follow-up through December 2021. Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated using Bedside Schwartz equation for children ≤ 18 years, CKD-EPI Creatinine Equation for persons ≥ 19 years, and CKD-EPI Cystatin C equation for persons with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined according to KDIGO AKI guidelines. Patients with cardiac diagnoses other than dilated cardiomyopathy, those supported by a ventricular assist device at any point during follow-up, and those receiving dapagliflozin for < 90 days were excluded from left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) analysis. This study was approved by our center’s Institutional Review Board.
Statistical Analysis
Categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages and compared using the Chi-square test. Fisher’s exact test was used in lieu of the Chi-square test when the expected cell count was < 5. Continuous characteristics and outcomes were assessed for normality using histograms and reported as mean (± standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) values. Continuous variables were compared using a paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed rank exact test. Significance testing was done at the α = .05 level. RStudio Team (2020) was used for all analyses.
Results
Dapagliflozin was initiated in 42 non-diabetic children with a diagnosis of HF as outlined in our methods. Of these 42 patients, four were excluded as three received dapagliflozin for < 14 days before undergoing heart transplant and one received dapagliflozin for > 30 days but was excluded due to lack of follow-up. Median age was 12.2 years (IQR 6.2–17.5 years) and 50% were female (Table 2). Nine of the 38 patients (23.7%) included in our analysis were newly diagnosed with HF at the time of dapagliflozin initiation. Most had at least one hospitalization for HF in the preceding year (76.3%) and 63.2% were initiated on dapagliflozin during an inpatient admission. Majority of patients had dilated cardiomyopathy (68.4%) and reduced LVEF ≤ 40% (65.8%). Four patients had diastolic HF (three heart transplant patients and one with repaired truncus arteriosus). Of the seven single ventricle patients, four had hypoplastic left heart syndrome, one had pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum, one patient had double outlet right ventricle, large ventricular septal defect, and pulmonary stenosis, and one patient had tricuspid atresia. The seven single ventricle patients were at various stages of single ventricle palliation including three status post Fontan palliations, two status post Glenn palliations, one status post stage hybrid procedure, and one status post pulmonary artery band.
Dapagliflozin was added to a HF regimen that frequently included sacubitril/valsartan (73.7%), beta-blocker (71%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (63.2%), and loop diuretic (71%) (Table 3). Median target dapagliflozin dose received was 7.5 mg (IQR 2.5–10 mg) or 0.16 mg/kg/day (IQR 0.12–0.19 mg/kg/day). Median follow-up for all 38 patients was 130 days (IQR 76–332 days). Mean serum sodium increased significantly from 135.8 to 137.5 mEq/L (P = .01), mean magnesium from 2 to 2.12 mg/dL (P = .02), median hemoglobin from 11.5 to 13.3 mg/dL (P = .004), median hematocrit from 35.5 to 39.6% (P = .002) while median BNP decreased significantly from 222 to 166 pg/mL (P = .04) at latest clinical follow-up (Table 3). Urinalysis was negative for glucose before dapagliflozin initiation and 1 + to 3 + glucosuria was measured for most patients ≥ 1 week after starting dapagliflozin, confirming its pharmacodynamic effect. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification improved in 5/38 (13.2%), worsened in 5/38 (13.2%), and remained unchanged in 28/38 (73.6%). Median eGFR decreased from 118 to 100 mL/min/1.73 m2 though this did not reach statistical significance (P = .09). From a hemodynamic standpoint, there were no significant changes to heart rate or blood pressure from baseline to latest follow-up (Table 3).
Safety
A summary for each patient, including individual duration of follow-up and events experienced while receiving dapagliflozin, is detailed in Table 4. Five patients (13.1%) with history of hospitalization for HF in the preceding year experienced HF rehospitalization after starting dapagliflozin. Of seven patients already actively listed for heart transplant, two were transplanted by latest follow-up. One patient with dilated cardiomyopathy underwent HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement at 24 days after starting dapagliflozin due to acute decompensated HF. One patient with failed Fontan physiology and known history of ventricular tachycardia and in-home cardiac arrest died at home from sudden cardiac arrest after 190 days without prior known complications from dapagliflozin.
No patients experienced symptomatic hypovolemia requiring fluid resuscitation or hypoglycemia requiring glucose treatment. Four patients experienced an AKI event. Of these, two occurred during a HF hospitalization, one during routine ambulatory clinical follow-up, and one after aggressive diuresis in the setting of bilateral pleural effusions. Only one patient had dapagliflozin temporarily held surrounding the AKI event.
Dapagliflozin was discontinued in six patients for various indications: patient 1 with underlying progressive mitochondrial disease after 119 days when all oral medications were discontinued during HF hospitalization, patient 2 was a heart transplant recipient with diastolic dysfunction and stage IIIB chronic kidney disease declined for second heart transplant listing after 120 days when hospitalized for central line-associated sepsis and multi-organ failure, patient 3 had dapagliflozin discontinued at 32 days due to new urinary tract infection (UTI) while supported by HeartMate 3 LVAD, patients 4 and 5 at 30 and 72 days, respectively, at time of heart transplant, and patient 6 after 225 days given significant improvement in left ventricular function leading to weaning of HF pharmacotherapy.
Urinary Tract Infections
Six patients experienced a symptomatic UTI requiring antibiotic treatment at 10, 13, 32, 45, 121 and 245 days, respectively, after starting dapagliflozin. All six patients had 3 + glucosuria closest to UTI diagnosis. Four of the six patients had microbiologically confirmed UTIs while the remaining two patients did not have urine cultures assessed but presented with acute cystitis, hematuria, and urinalysis consistent with UTI diagnosis. Three of the six patients were females aged 9.8, 10.9, and 17.8 years with a recent history of UTI prior to dapagliflozin initiation. The other three patients had more complicated histories that predisposed them to UTI: a 19.4 year-old male with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and new radiographic evidence of renal infarction at time of UTI diagnosis; a 9.8 year-old male with LMNA muscular dystrophy supported by HeartMate 3 LVAD and had recent Foley catheter in place; and a 19.6 year-old female with history of mixed incontinence and radiographic evidence of medical renal disease prior to starting dapagliflozin. No patients required hospital admission or prolongation of hospitalization due to UTI while receiving dapagliflozin.
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Analysis
Among the 26 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in our cohort, 16 were included in a separate LVEF sub-analysis (10 excluded for receiving dapagliflozin for < 90 days at latest follow-up; 3 of these 10 patients were supported by a LVAD during follow-up). Over a median of 313 days (IQR 191–414), LVEF increased in 12/16 (75%), decreased in 3/16 (18.8%), and remained unchanged in 1/16 (6.2%). Median LVEF increased significantly from 32 to 37.2% (P = .006) and significantly more patients had LVEF > 40% at latest follow-up compared to baseline (43.8 vs 6.3%, P = .04).
Discussion
This is the first description of SGLT2 inhibitor use in pediatric HF. Dapagliflozin was well tolerated without clinically significant electrolyte derangements, hypovolemia, or hypoglycemia. Although dapagliflozin induces natriuresis, our results suggest that dapagliflozin may not cause hyponatremia regardless of diuretic use. Additionally, mechanisms other than hemoconcentration, including augmentation of erythropoiesis, may partly explain a sustained increase in hemoglobin and hematocrit [5]. The occurrence of AKI in our study was notable but could not be attributed to dapagliflozin alone as these events occurred months after dapagliflozin initiation and AKI in pediatric cardiac patients is not uncommon [6].
Dapagliflozin is postulated to have favorable effects on myocardial remodeling and improve outcomes in HF via various physiological functions including downregulation of sympathetic activity and reduction of preload and afterload lessening cardiac stress/injury resulting in less hypertrophy [4]. While we did note an improvement in LVEF in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, we are not positing that it was due to dapagliflozin alone as many of the patients were on guideline-directed therapy including sacubitril/valsartan, beta-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists, which adult studies have shown to improve LVEF [7,8,9,10,11]. National data indicate the frequency of 30-day readmissions for HF in children is approximately 13%; no patients in our cohort experienced a HF-related hospital readmission within the first 30 days of starting dapagliflozin and the frequency of HF readmissions described in our analysis is not higher than the readmission rate reported nationally for children with HF (3).
By inducing glucosuria, dapagliflozin may have increased risk for UTI in those with predisposing risk factors in our cohort, including recent UTI and Foley catheter placement. Consistent with our results, UTIs were reported more frequently in patients receiving the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin for chronic HF [12]. However, trials of dapagliflozin in patients with chronic HF suggest no effect on incidence of UTIs [13].
This single-center analysis is limited by its observational nature and small sample size. Our study included a heterogenous cohort of children with HF due to primary cardiomyopathies or congenital structural heart disease, which further limits broad interpretations. In effort to minimize the impact of this limitation, our LVEF analysis included only those patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Concomitant HF medications such as sacubitril/valsartan and beta-blockers were actively being titrated in some patients during follow-up and could have certainly contributed to decreased BNP and improved LVEF observed in our analysis. Although a matched case–control study design might better ascertain changes in BNP and LVEF, the timing of sacubitril/valsartan gaining FDA approval for pediatric HF preceded publication of DAPA-HF Trial by only one month; thus most patients in our cohort were already receiving or transitioned to sacubitril/valsartan at baseline when dapagliflozin was started [14, 15]. A control cohort would consist predominantly of patients receiving ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, not sacubitril/valsartan, which would comprise HF regimens that are too dissimilar and a major limitation of that type of analysis. Lastly, there are no published data on pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of dapagliflozin in pediatric HF patients, so we were assuming pharmacodynamic effect based on the presence of glucosuria.
Conclusions
This first description of dapagliflozin use in pediatric HF demonstrates a reasonable safety profile and when added to guideline-directed medical therapy, is well tolerated. There may be a possible association of dapagliflozin use with UTIs in at-risk individuals. While there was improvement in LVEF in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in our small cohort, larger studies in children should be undertaken to determine if dapagliflozin is as beneficial in children with HF as it has been demonstrated in adults with HF.
References
Kirk R, Dipchand AI, Rosenthal DN et al (2014) the international society for heart and lung transplantation guidelines for the management of pediatric heart failure: executive summary. J Heart Lung Transplant 33:888–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2014.06.002
Ahmed H, Vanderpluym C (2021) Medical management of pediatric heart failure. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 11(1):323–335. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt-20-358
Moffett BS, Humlicek TJ, Rossano JW, Price JF, Cabrera AG (2016) Readmissions for heart failure in children. J Pediatr 177:153-158.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.003
Maddox TM, Januzzi JL Jr, Allen LA, Breathett K, Butler J, Davis LL, Fonarow GC, Ibrahim NE, Lindenfeld J, Masoudi FA, Motiwala SR, Oliveros E, Patterson JH, Walsh MN, Wasserman A, Yancy CW, Youmans QR (2021) 2021 update to the 2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway for optimization of heart failure treatment: answers to 10 pivotal issues about heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol 77:772–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.022
Jackson AM, Dewan P, Anand IS et al (2020) Dapagliflozin and diuretic use in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in DAPA-HF [published correction appears in Circulation. 2020 Nov 17;142(20):e369]. Circulation. 142(11):1040–1054. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047077
Riley A, Gebhard DJ, Akcan-Arikan A (2016) Acute kidney injury in pediatric heart failure. Curr Cardiol Rev 12(2):121–131. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403x12666151119165628
Zhang N, Wang Y, Tse G et al (2022) Effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiac remodelling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 28(17):1961–1973. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwab173
Yu YW, Zhao XM, Wang YH et al (2021) Effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardiac structure and function in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with or without chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol 20(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-020-01209-y
Januzzi JL Jr, Prescott MF, Butler J et al (2019) Association of change in n-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide following initiation of sacubitril-valsartan treatment with cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JAMA 322(11):1085–1095. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.12821
Cleland JGF, Bunting KV, Flather MD et al (2018) Beta-blockers for heart failure with reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction: an individual patient-level analysis of double-blind randomized trials. Eur Heart J 39(1):26–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx564
Vizzardi E, D’Aloia A, Giubbini R et al (2010) Effect of spironolactone on left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in patients with class I or II heart failure. Am J Cardiol 106(9):1292–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.052
Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G et al (2021) Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 385(16):1451–1461. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2107038
Cai RP, Xu YL, Su Q (2021) Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol Res Pract 2021:6657380. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6657380
Entresto (2021) Package insert. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE et al (2019) Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 381(21):1995–2008. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911303
Acknowledgements
None.
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DMN involved in study design, data acquisition, data analysis, interpretation of data, drafting, and revision of manuscript. YML, ELA, JFL, HA, MSK contributed to interpretation of data and revision of manuscript. BJH involved in study design, data acquisition, interpretation of data, drafting, and revision of manuscript. All authors have approved the final article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
All authors listed in this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose and have approved the final article.
Informed Consent
The need for informed consent was waived for this study of deidentified data.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Newland, D.M., Law, Y.M., Albers, E.L. et al. Early Clinical Experience with Dapagliflozin in Children with Heart Failure. Pediatr Cardiol 44, 146–152 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-02983-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-02983-0