Abstract
Because of their persistence in aquatic environments and ability to impair reproduction and other critical physiological processes, organochlorine (OC) contaminants pose significant health risks to marine organisms. Despite such concerns, few studies have investigated levels of OC exposure in sharks, which are fish particularly threatened by anthropogenic pollution because of their tendency to bioaccumulate and biomagnify environmental contaminants. The present study examined concentrations of 29 OC pesticides and total polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the bonnethead shark (Sphyrna tiburo), an abundant species for which evidence of reproductive impairment has been observed in certain Florida populations. Quantifiable levels of PCBs and 22 OC pesticides were detected via gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in liver of 95 S. tiburo from four estuaries on Florida’s Gulf coast: Apalachicola Bay, Tampa Bay, Florida Bay, and Charlotte Harbor. In general, OC concentrations were significantly higher in Apalachicola Bay, Tampa Bay, and Charlotte Harbor S. tiburo in relation to the Florida Bay population. Because the rate of infertility has been shown to be dramatically higher in Tampa Bay versus Florida Bay S. tiburo, the present findings allude to a possible relationship between OC exposure and reproductive health that requires further investigation. Pesticide and PCB concentrations did not appear to significantly increase with growth or age in S. tiburo, suggesting limited potential for OC bioaccumulation in this species compared with other sharks for which contaminant data are available. Concentrations of OCs in serum and muscle were not correlated with those in liver, indicating that these tissues are poor surrogates for measuring internal OC burden in this species via nonlethal sampling procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Even at sublethal levels of exposure, organochlorine (OCs) contaminants such as pesticides and industrial chemicals pose significant health risks to aquatic organisms. Because of the ability of these compounds to interact with both invertebrate and vertebrate endocrine systems, OCs and their metabolites are capable of impairing general health and reproduction of wildlife by altering the normal function of numerous, hormone-regulated physiological processes (National Research Council 1999). Because of these hazards, there is a need to characterize levels of OCs in aquatic fauna, especially large vertebrates, because of their tendency to bioaccumulate and biomagnify environmental pollutants. In response to this need, studies have documented concentrations of OCs in a wide variety of moderate- and large-sized aquatic vertebrates including tuna (e.g., Stefanelli et al. 2002; Ueno et al. 2002), sea turtles (e.g., Alam and Brim 2000; Storelli and Marcotrigiano 2000), alligators (e.g., Guillette et al. 1999), crocodiles (e.g., Wu 2000a, b), sea birds (e.g., Guruge et al. 2001; Braune et al. 2002), pinnipeds (e.g., Kajiwara et al. 2001; Le Boeuf et al. 2002), walruses (e.g., Muir et al. 2000; Seagars and Garlich-Miller 2001), cetaceans (e.g., Kumari et al. 2002; Tilbury et al. 2002), dugongs (Vetter et al. 2001), and polar bears (e.g., Henriksen et al. 2001; Lie et al. 2003). As demonstrated in several of these studies, accumulation of potentially hazardous levels of OCs often occurs in large vertebrates residing in even minimally contaminated habitats. Moreover, tissue levels of these compounds have been linked with reproductive and/or health abnormalities in certain species, as well as significant declines in the size of some wildlife populations (e.g., Hutchinson and Simmonds, 1994; Crain et al. 1997; Tangredi and Evans 1997; Guillette et al. 1999; Helander et al. 2002; Tanabe 2002; Derocher et al. 2003).
Although sharks are a major component of marine megafauna, few studies have examined levels of OCs in tissues of these fish (Corsolini et al. 1995; Blanch et al. 1996; Serrano et al. 1997, 2000; Storelli and Marcotrigiano 2001; Storelli et al. 2003a, b). The relative lack of such data compared with those for other aquatic vertebrates warrants concern because many shark species often occupy terminal positions in marine food chains and, as a result, may accumulate OCs at levels similar to those in other top predators. Furthermore, the potential effects of OC exposure may have drastic implications for the health and survival of shark populations because these fish generally tend to exhibit life history characteristics consistent with limited reproductive potential and low rates of population growth. Given these points, it is critical to build upon previous observations on OC contamination in sharks and their relatives, especially in light of recent concerns regarding the sustainability of shark populations worldwide (Camhi et al. 1998).
The goal of this study was to examine OC concentrations in tissues of the bonnethead shark (Sphyrna tiburo), a well-characterized species for which data on reproduction (Parsons 1993a; Manire et al. 1995 2004; Manire and Rasmussen 1997; Manire et al. 1999; Gelsleichter et al. 2003; Nichols et al. 2003; Lombardi-Carlson et al. 2004; Gelsleichter et al. 2002; Chapman et al. 2004), feeding ecology (Cortes et al. 1996), growth rate (Parsons 1993b; Carlson and Parsons 1997; Lombardi-Carlson et al. 2004), and population growth (Cortes and Parsons 1996) are available. In addition to addressing the need for information regarding pollutant concentrations in sharks, this research was motivated by concerns that certain populations of S. tiburo in southwest Florida may be experiencing reproductive complications as a result of habitat degradation. In particular, high rates of infertility have been observed in S. tiburo residing in the Tampa Bay estuary, one of the most highly urbanized regions on Florida’s Gulf coast (Parsons 1993a). In comparison, infertility rates in bonnethead shark populations inhabiting the less industrialized Florida Bay estuary were found to be significantly lower (Parsons 1993a). The present study determined concentrations of pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in liver of S. tiburo from these and other estuaries in southwest Florida to explore the potential relationship between OC burden and infertility rate, as well as other factors such as sex, size, and age. In addition, OC concentrations in muscle and serum of these animals were examined to determine whether they are suitable surrogates for measuring contaminant levels in sharks and their relatives via nonlethal approaches.
Materials and Methods
Sampling
Bonnethead sharks (N = 95) were collected using set gill nets between 1998 and 2001 from sites within or adjacent to four estuaries along Florida’s Gulf coast (Figure 1): Apalachicola Bay (N = 9 female, 13 male), Tampa Bay (N = 17 female, 15 male), Charlotte Harbor (N = 5 female, 5 male), and Florida Bay (N = 18 female, 13 male). Studies on sediment quality in these estuaries (Seal et al. 1994; Cantillo et al. 1999; Santschi et al. 2001; Scott et al. 2002) and contaminant load in resident wildlife (Alam and Brim 2000; Brim et al. 2001; Oliver et al. 2001; Scott et al. 2002) indicate that they represent a wide range in the type and levels of OC exposure. Because the majority of Florida Bay lies within the boundaries of Everglades National Park, it has not been subjected to extensive urban development and remains a minimally contaminated site in comparison with other Florida estuaries. In contrast, given that it borders one of Florida’s most densely populated coastal areas, Tampa Bay is generally considered to be a pollutant-impacted estuary despite recent improvements in environmental quality. Levels of OC exposure in both Apalachicola Bay and Charlotte Harbor have been reported to be intermediate between those in Florida Bay and Tampa Bay, but may have recently increased due to rapid coastal development in these areas.
Blood samples were obtained from each shark, after capture, via caudal venipuncture and were immediately placed on ice, where they were allowed to clot for 3–6 h. Blood samples were later centrifuged (1300g) and sera were frozen at −20°C until thawed for contaminant analysis. Sharks were sexed, measured, weighed, and transported to the laboratory on ice for sterile dissection of muscle and liver samples, which also were frozen at −20°C until processed for OC assays. Muscle samples were obtained from the left dorsolateral flank just behind the gills. Liver samples were obtained from the lower third of the right hepatic lobe. Lastly, vertebral centra from the region directly below the first dorsal fin were sampled and used to estimate age following the procedures described in Lombardi-Carlson et al. (2004).
Sample Extraction and Clean-up
Extraction procedures were adapted from Mill’s (1959) multiresidue method for the isolation of nonpolar analytes from fatty foods. For extraction of analytes from shark muscle and liver, 10 g or the entire tissue sample was homogenized with 0.5 g of sodium sulfate and 100 mL of ethyl acetate (10 mL/g sample). The supernatant was decanted and filtered though a Buchner funnel lined with Whatman #1 filter paper and filled to a depth of 1.25 cm with sodium sulfate. The remaining homogenate was extracted and filtered a second time with filtrates combined. The pooled filtrate was concentrated until solvent-free by rotary evaporation, transferred to a 15-mL conical tube, and reconstituted in 10 mL of ethyl acetate. At this stage, the extract was either stored at −20°C or immediately subjected to clean-up procedures. A volume equivalent to 1 g of sample was removed, concentrated under dry nitrogen until solvent-free, redissolved in 2 mL of acetonitrile, vortexed for 30 s, and applied to a SPE-C18 cartridge (J & W Scientific, Inc., Folsom, CA) preconditioned with 3 mL of acetonitrile. The sample tube was rinsed once with 2 mL of acetonitrile, after which the rinse was applied to the SPE-C18 cartridge and combined with the previous eluent. The cartridge was rinsed a second time with 1 mL of acetonitrile, which also was combined with the prior eluents. The pooled extract was then applied to a 0.5-g SPE-NH2 cartridge (Varian, Inc., Harbor City, CA) and allowed to pass under gravity with the eluent collected. The column was rinsed with 1 mL of acetonitrile, which was collected and combined with the previous eluent. Lastly, the pooled eluents were concentrated under a stream of dry nitrogen, redissolved in 300 μL of acetone, and transferred to a vial for OC analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
For extraction of analytes from shark serum, 1 mL or the entire sample was mixed with 1.5 mL of acetone, vortexed for 20 s, and centrifuged for 5 min at 1500g. The supernatant was transferred to a clean culture tube and the extraction was repeated with supernatants combined. The extract was mixed with 2 mL of methylene chloride:petroleum ether (1:1), after which the culture tube was capped, shaken for 10 s, and the contents were allowed to separate. The upper layer was transferred to a second tube and the extraction was repeated. The combined upper layers were then applied to a 5-ml SPE-Florisil cartridge (Fisher Scientific PrepSep, Fairlane, NJ), which had previously been prepared with 1.25 cm of sodium sulfate and conditioned with 10 mL of acetone:methylene chloride:petroleum ether (2:1:1). The sample was allowed to pass under gravity with the eluent collected in a conical tube. The cartridge was eluted with 4 mL of the preconditioning solvent, which was collected and combined with the first eluent. The combined extract was concentrated under a stream of nitrogen, reconstituted in 300 μL of acetone, and transferred to a vial for OC analysis by GC-MS.
Contaminant Analysis
Samples were screened for a panel of 29 pesticides and total PCBs (Table 1). Analytical grade standards for the following compounds were purchased from the sources indicated: aldrin, α-benzene hexachloride (BHC), β-BHC, Lindane, δ-BHC, p,p′-DDD, p,p′-DDE, p,p′-DDT, dieldrin, endosulfan, endosulfan II, endosulfan sulfate, endrin, endrin aldehyde, heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide, hexachlorobenzene, methoxychlor, mirex, cis-nonachlor, and trans-nonachlor from Ultra Scientific (Kingstown, RI); 4-bromodiphenylether and 4-chlorodiphenylether from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI); cis-chlordane, trans-chlordane, and 525, 525.1 PCB mix from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA); oxychlordane from Chem Service, Inc. (West Chester, PA); and toxaphene from Restek Corp. (Bellefonte, PA). No analytical grade standards were available for MC-2 and MC-5, isomers of heptachlor and trans-chlordane, respectively. Therefore, these analytes were quantified using the heptachlor and trans-chlordane standards.
Analysis of samples was performed using a Hewlett Packard HP-6890 gas chromatograph (Palo Alto, CA) with split/splitless inlet, operated in splitless mode. Analytes were introduced in a 1-μL injection and separated across the HP-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25 μm film thickness) under a temperature program that began at 60°C, increased at 10°C/min to 270°C (at which point it was held for 5 min), then increased at 25°C/min to 300°C. Detection utilized an HP-5973 mass spectrometer in electron impact mode. Identification for all ana1ytes was conducted in full scan mode in which all ions are monitored. To improve sensitivity, selected ion monitoring was used for quantitation of all analytes, except toxaphene.
For quantitation, a five-point standard curve was prepared for each analyte (R2 ≥ 0.995). Fresh curves were analyzed with each set of 20 samples. Each standard and sample was fortified to contain a deuterated internal standard, 5 μL of US-108 (120 μg/mL, Ultra Scientific). All samples also contained a surrogate, 0.6 μg/g of tetrachlorometaxylene (Ultra Scientific; percentage recovery ≥66%), added at homogenization. For liver and muscle, duplicate quality control samples (nominally 0.3 or 0.75 μg/g of γ-BHC, heptachlor, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, and p,p′-DDT; percentage recovery ≥60%, except aldrin, which was affected by matrix interference in some samples) were prepared and analyzed with every 20 samples. Because of limited sample, this was not possible for serum, and quality control matrices were prepared from fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT; percentage recovery >70%, except for dieldrin, >50%).
Data Analysis
Data for compounds detected in more than 5% of the total samples examined were analyzed using multiple regression procedures to determine whether site of capture, sex, size, age, and/or tissue type contributed to variability in OC concentrations. In individual cases when one of these compounds was not detected or was present at levels below the limit of quantitation (LOQ), numerical values of zero or the midpoint between the limit of detection and the LOQ, respectively, were assigned to permit statistical analysis. Data were subsequently grouped by factors that significantly contributed to differences in OC concentrations, and were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Student–Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test. Associations between OC concentrations in liver and other tissues were examined using Pearson correlation to assess the use of muscle and/or serum as surrogates for estimating pollutant levels in S. tiburo. Linear regression was used to determine whether OC concentrations increased with age and growth of S. tiburo, an indication of contaminant bioaccumulation in this species.
Results
Quantifiable levels of 22 of the 29 OC pesticides and metabolites analyzed in the present study were detected in S. tiburo from at least one of the four sampling sites. Only 4-chlorodiphenylether, β-BHC, lindane, δ-BHC, heptachlor, and toxaphene were not detected in any animal, whereas hexachlorobenzene was always present in levels below the LOQ. Because 4-bromophenylether, α-BHC, endosulfan I, endrin, and endrin aldehyde were detected in less than 5% of the total samples examined, they were not subjected to further analysis. Measurable levels of PCBs were present in virtually all sharks examined, regardless of site of collection.
Multiple regression analysis of data from 177 tissue samples (N = 62 liver, 50 muscle, 65 serum) indicated that tissue type and site of collection were the major factors that contributed to variations in OC concentrations in S. tiburo from Florida’s Gulf coast (Table 2). In fact, animal size and age contributed to variations in the levels of only one analyte each (p,p′-DDE and heptachlor epoxide, respectively). The regression model also indicated that gender was associated with variations in total PCB concentrations (male > female), but these results were marginally significant (P = 0.047).
Comparisons of mean pollutant concentrations by tissue type and site of capture indicated that DDT and chlordane compounds were the most abundant OC pesticides and metabolites present in S. tiburo from Florida estuaries (Tables 3 and 4). Other compounds that comprised a noteworthy proportion of the total OC burden included dieldrin, endosulfan II, methoxychlor, and mirex (Table 5). Although they were detected in more than 5% of the total samples examined, aldrin and endosulfan sulfate did not contribute greatly to overall contaminant load.
Contaminants detected in more than 5% of the total samples examined were grouped by mode of action (see Table 1 for groupings) and reanalyzed to provide a condensed, but informative summary of differences in OC levels associated with site of collection (Figure 2). Significant differences in liver concentrations of dichlorodiphenylethanes (Apalachicola Bay > Tampa Bay = Charlotte Harbor > Florida Bay), chlorinated cyclodienes (Tampa Bay > Apalachicola Bay > Charlotte Harbor = Florida Bay), and total PCBs (Apalachicola Bay = Tampa Bay = Charlotte Harbor > Florida Bay) were observed among sampling areas (ANOVA and Student–Newma–Keuls, P < 0.05). However, these differences were not consistent for OC levels in other tissues examined, which did not vary significantly among sites with the sole exception of serum concentrations of chlorinated cyclodienes (Tampa Bay > Apalachicola Bay = Florida Bay, P < 0.05). Therefore, OC concentrations in muscle and serum did not appear to reflect internal contaminant load in S. tiburo.
The use of muscle and/or serum as surrogates for measuring levels of contamination in S. tiburo nonlethally was further evaluated by performing correlation analysis on data from animals in which OC concentrations in liver and muscle (N = 44) or liver and serum (N = 33) were both tested (Table 6). Because of the lack of quantifiable levels of several OCs in muscle and serum, this was possible for only a limited number of analytes (liver–muscle: 10, liver–serum: 8). No significant correlations between OC concentrations in liver and muscle were observed. Concentrations of only two compounds in liver and serum were significantly correlated (trans- and cis-nonachlor, Pearson r, P < 0.05), but the proportion of explained variance for these associations was low (R2 = 0.16 and 0.36, respectively).
Because of significant differences in contaminant levels among sites, relationships between liver OC concentrations and age or size were examined separately for each sampling area (Table 7). Of the 101 regression analyses performed, only 19 data sets exhibited a significant linear relationship between OC concentrations and age or growth of S. tiburo (P < 0.05). Only 10 of these data sets reflected an increase in OC levels over time, and all but 1 were associated with rather poor fit around the regression line (R2 < 0.75). Taken together, these results indicated limited potential for bioaccumulation of OCs in S. tiburo.
Discussion
The present study represents one of the largest efforts to characterize levels of OC contamination in an elasmobranch species to date. It also is one of few studies that have investigated OC exposure in coastal sharks, many of which face unique risks from marine pollution because of their dependence on increasingly degraded nearshore and estuarine areas as sites for breeding and juvenile refuge (Castro 1993). In fact, all previously published studies on OC contamination in elasmobranchs have focused on deep-water benthic or pelagic species (Corsolini et al. 1995; Blanch et al. 1996; Serrano et al. 1997, 2000; Storelli and Marcotrigiano 2001; Fisk et al. 2002; Storelli et al. 2003a, b) with the exception of recent observations on leopard sharks (Triakis semifasciata) from San Francisco Bay, CA (Davis et al. 2002). Because most of these studies have documented the ability of sharks to accumulate OCs at potentially hazardous levels, it was important to determine whether similar or greater risks are experienced by coastal species like S. tiburo, which may inhabit pollutant-impacted regions on a more regular basis.
Despite prolonged residence in historically contaminated regions, S. tiburo does not appear to accumulate OCs at levels that have been reported in deep-water elasmobranchs. For example, liver concentrations of total DDTs in S. tiburo rarely exceeded 100 ng/g, a quantity far below those observed in Arctic Sea Greenland sharks, Somniosus microcephalus (mean ± SE = 7159 ± 1271 ng/g [lipid basis], Fisk et al. 2002), and Mediterranean Sea gulper sharks, Centrophorus granulosus, and longnose spurdogs, Squalus blainvillei (mean ± SE = 4481 ± 961 and 1625 ± 439, respectively: Storelli and Marcotrigiano 2001). Total chlordane concentrations in the liver of S. microcephalus (mean ± SE = 1815 ± 473 ng/g [lipid basis], Fisk et al. 2002) also surpassed those detected in S. tiburo by a considerable margin. In addition, total PCB concentrations in S. tiburo liver were far less than those observed in a number of species including S. microcephalus (mean ± SE = 3442 ± 650 ng/g [lipid basis], Fisk et al. 2002), C. granulosus (mean ± SE = 1741 ± 531, Storelli and Marcotrigiano 2001), S. blainvillei (mean ± SE = 958 ± 658, Storelli and Marcotrigiano 2001), blackmouthed dogfish, Galeus melastomus (mean ± SE ranging from 853 ± 471 to 1072 ± 387 ng/g, Storelli et al. 2003b), and 7 of 8 squaloid dogfish species from the northwest coast of Africa (mean ± SE ranging from 387 ± 127 to 4723 ± 3,670 ng/g; Serrano et al. 2000). Although total DDT and PCB concentrations in adipose fat of blue (Prionace glauca) and thresher (Alopias vulpinus) sharks from Italy’s Mediterranean coast were generally comparable with those observed in the present study, these species also appear to be capable of accumulating much greater levels of OCs than, S. tiburo (values ranged from 14 to 300 ng/g and 70 to 4400 ng/g for total DDTs and PCBs, respectively; Corsolini et al. 1995).
In contrast with that in deep-water elasmobranchs, OC concentrations in leopard sharks from San Francisco Bay were generally lower than those observed in S. tiburo. In fact, liver concentrations of total DDTs, chlordanes, and PCBs in S. tiburo from even the least contaminated sites on Florida’s Gulf coast were greater than those observed in T. semifasciata (median = 5.3 ng/g, 1.1 ng/g, and 11 ng/g for total DDTs, chlordanes, and PCBs, respectively; Davis et al. 2002). Liver concentrations of dieldrin in T. semifasciata (median = 0.2 ng/g; Davis et al. 2002) also were lower than those detected in S. tiburo with the exception of animals residing in the Florida Bay estuary. Nonetheless, differences in OC concentrations in these two species were relatively minor in comparison with those between S. tiburo and the deep-sea sharks previously discussed.
The large degree of disparity between OC concentrations in deep-water sharks and coastal species such as S. tiburo and T. semifasciata is likely a consequence of differences in the feeding behavior, longevity, and/or lipid content of these animals. Unlike coastal sharks, which generally feed on benthic invertebrates and small fish (Cortés et al. 1997; Vebber and Cech 1998), some deep-water species such as S. microcephalus consume prey as large as marine mammals (Fisk et al. 2002), making them more likely to biomagnify OCs and other environmental contaminants. Furthermore, although they are difficult to age (MacFarlane et al. 2002), deep-sea sharks are generally considered to be more long-lived than coastal species. Therefore, even moderately sized deep-water sharks have the potential to bioaccumulate significant concentrations of OCs over time. Following this premise, the relatively short lifespan of S. tiburo (Lombardi et al. 2004) may explain the comparatively limited ability of bonnethead sharks to accumulate greater concentrations of OCs as they age. Surprisingly, Serrano et al. (2000) and Fisk et al. (2002) also found no relationship between OC concentrations and growth in Portuguese dogfish (Centroscymnus coelolepis) and S. microcephalus, respectively, but these findings were likely due to limited range in the size of specimens.
Variations in pesticide concentrations of S. tiburo from different Florida estuaries appeared to reflect what is known regarding levels of OC contamination in these regions. With few exceptions, the concentrations of individual pesticides were highest in bonnethead sharks from Tampa Bay, a site generally considered to be the most pollutant-impacted estuary on Florida’s Gulf coast. Previous studies have reported concentrations of OC pesticides in Tampa Bay sediments that exceed guidance values for adverse biological effects (Seal et al. 1994; Carr et al. 1996; Santschi et al. 2001; Macauley et al. 2002), as well as substantial accumulation of these same compounds in resident wildlife (i.e., oysters; Fisher et al. 2000; Oliver et al. 2001). Concentrations of dichlorodiphenylethanes in particular also were high in Apalachicola Bay sharks, a finding seemingly at odds with reports of only moderate levels of OC contamination in this region (Seal et al. 1994). However, more recent studies have demonstrated that levels of certain pesticides (e.g., DDD, DDE) in wildlife (i.e, oysters, striped bass, sea turtle eggs) from Apalachicola Bay may rival or even exceed those from Tampa Bay (Alam and Brim 2000; Brim et al. 2001; Oliver et al. 2001). Although pesticide concentrations were generally low in Charlotte Harbor S. tiburo, the levels of total DDTs in these animals also were similar to those observed in Tampa Bay sharks and justify additional investigations on the poorly studied contaminant levels in this estuary.
Overall pesticide concentrations were lowest in Florida Bay S. tiburo, a finding that was expected based on the low degree of OC contamination in this region (Seal et al. 1994). However, it was surprising that sharks from Florida Bay did not contain detectable tissue concentrations of endosulfans, the OC pesticides of greatest concern in this estuary because of their prevalent utilization on south Florida vegetable crops (Scott et al. 2002). Low accumulation of these compounds in S. tiburo may be associated with diet, given that earlier studies have detected considerably higher concentrations of endosulfans in herbivorous and omnivorous teleosts when compared with carnivorous species (Scott et al. 2002).
Although their use for industrial applications was banned in the United States in the late 1970s, PCBs remain abundant in the aquatic environment because of their persistence in marine sediments and continued use in other countries (National Research Council 1999). Because of this, the presence of detectable concentrations of PCBs in virtually all S. tiburo that were examined in this study was not unexpected. As for most pesticides, concentrations of PCBs were low in Florida Bay S. tiburo, presumably because of limited historical use in this region. Tissue concentrations of these compounds were significantly greater in sharks from all other sampling areas, but did not differ among these sites. These results were generally consistent with recent studies on OC concentrations in oysters from Apalachicola Bay and Tampa Bay, which suggested comparable levels of PCB contamination in these estuaries (Oliver et al. 2001). Although moderately elevated concentrations of PCBs in Apalachicola Bay, Tampa Bay, and Charlotte Harbor sharks draw attention to the possible health risks associated with these compounds, it is difficult to address such concerns because of the lack of specific data regarding tissue levels of the highly toxic, “dioxin-like” coplanar PCBs in the present study. However, because potentially hazardous concentrations of some of the most toxic coplanar PCBs (e.g., PCBs 77, 118, 126) have been detected in Apalachicola Bay and Tampa Bay wildlife (e.g., oysters, sea turtles; Alam and Brim 2000; Oliver et al. 2001), it is reasonable to consider that these compounds constitute a nontrivial proportion of the total PCB burden in sharks residing in these same areas. Therefore, more detailed investigations on PCB contamination in Florida shark populations are needed.
In a study on geographic variation in reproduction of Florida S. tiburo, Parsons (1993a) reported that Tampa Bay populations of this species experience markedly higher rates of infertility in comparison with those residing in the Florida Bay estuary. Because infertility is generally rare in elasmobranchs (Parsons 1983; Hanchet 1988), Parsons (1993a) hypothesized that differences in the reproductive success of these populations may be associated with environmental factors such as anthropogenic pollution. The results of the present study add some weight to this notion by demonstrating that Tampa Bay sharks are exposed to and accumulate greater concentrations of OC contaminants than more reproductively fit Florida Bay S. tiburo. Nonetheless, evidence for a relationship between OC exposure, and reproductive impairment in this species is circumstantial at best. Comparisons of reproductive fitness in populations of S. tiburo from the four study sites are being conducted to address these concerns, and published accounts of this research are forthcoming.
Although modest amounts of blood can be obtained from elasmobranchs using nonlethal procedures, the results of the present study do not support the use of serum for assessing internal OC concentrations in these fishes. Serum pesticide concentrations in S. tiburo generally were not correlated with those in liver, the tissue most likely to accumulate OCs in elasmobranchs because of its high lipid content. In fact, many OC contaminants present in liver of S. tiburo were not detected in serum from the same individuals. Concentrations of OCs in muscle of S. tiburo also were not correlated with those in liver, and similarly are not recommended as indicators of internal contaminant load. However, assessments of muscle OC concentrations in sharks have merit for characterizing the risks that aquatic contaminants pose to human populations that consume meat from these fish.
In summary, the present study has provided a wealth of novel data regarding levels of OC contamination in coastal shark populations residing in Florida estuaries. Although S. tiburo does not appear to accumulate OCs at concentrations observed in certain deep-water sharks, the potential relationship between contaminant exposure and reproductive failure in this species warrants further investigations on the effects of OCs on sharks and their relatives.
References
SK Alam MS Brim (2000) ArticleTitleOrganochlorine, PCB, PAH, and metal concentrations in eggs of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) from northwest Florida, USA J Environ Sci Health B 35 705–724 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crhtFOmuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11069014
GP Blanch R Serrano A Glausch V Schurig MJ Gonzalez (1996) ArticleTitleQuantification and determination of enantiomeric ratios of chiral PCB 95, PCB 132, PCB 149 in shark liver samples (C. coelolepis) from the Atlantic ocean J High Resol Chromatogr 19 390–396 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jhrc.1240190706
BM Braune GM Donaldson KA Hobson (2002) ArticleTitleContaminant residues in seabird eggs from the Canadian Arctic. II. Spatial trends and evidence from stable isotopes for intercolony differences Environ Pollut 117 133–145 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XhsFah Occurrence Handle11843528
MS Brim SK Alam LG Jenkins (2001) ArticleTitleOrganochlorine pesticides and heavy metals in muscle and ovaries of Gulf coast striped bass (Morone saxatilis) from the Apalachicola River, Florida, USA J Environ Sci Health B 36 15–27 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3os1WqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11281252
Camhi M, Fowler S, Musick J, Brautigam A, Fordham S (1998) Sharks and their relatives: ecology and conservation. IUCN/SSC Shark Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK
Cantillo AY, Lauenstein GG, O’Connor TP, Johnson WE (1999) Status and trends of contaminant levels in biota and sediments of south Florida. Regional report series 2. National Status and Trends Program for Marine Environmental Quality. Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Silver Spring, MD
JK Carlson GR Parsons (1997) ArticleTitleAge and growth of the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo, from northwest Florida, with comments on clinal variation Environ BioI Fish 50 331–341 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007342203214
RS Carr ER Long HL Windom DC Chapman G Thursby GM Sloane DA Wolfie (1996) ArticleTitleSediment quality assessment studies of Tampa Bay, Florida Environ Toxicol Chern 15 1218–1231 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XlsVOntrg%3D
JC Castro (1993) ArticleTitleThe shark nursery of Bulls Bay, South Carolina, with a review of the shark nurseries of the southeastern coast of the United States Environ BioI Fish 38 37–48 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00842902
DD Chapman PA Prodöhl J Gelsleichter CA Manire MS Shivji (2004) ArticleTitleMolecular insights into shark mating systems: predominance of genetic monogamy by females in the hammerhead Sphyrna tiburo (Carcharhiniformes, Sphyrnidae) Mol EcoI 13 1965–1974 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXlvFelu7Y%3D
C Corsolini S Focardi K Kannan S Tanabe A Borrell R Tatsukawa (1995) ArticleTitleCongener profile and toxicity assessment of polychlorinated biphenyls in dolphins, sharks and tuna collected from Italian waters Mar Environ Res 40 33–53 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXmvFOmsLw%3D
E Cortés CA Manire RE Hueter (1996) ArticleTitleDiet, feeding habits, and diel feeding chronology of the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo in southwest Florida Bull Mar Sci 58 353–367
E Cortés GR Parsons (1996) ArticleTitleComparative demography of two populations of the bonnethead shark (Sphyra tiburo) Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53 709–718 Occurrence Handle10.1139/cjfas-53-4-709
DA Crain LJ Guillette SuffixJr AA Rooney DB Pickford (1997) ArticleTitleAlterations in steroidogenesis in alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) exposed naturally and experimentally to environmental contaminants Environ Health Perspect 105 528–533 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA28ris10%3D Occurrence Handle9222139
JA Davis MD May BK Greenfield R Fairey C Roberts G Ichikawa MS Stoelting JS Becker RS Tjeerdema (2002) ArticleTitleContaminant concentrations in sport fish from San Francisco Bay, 1997 Mar Pollut Bull 44 1117–1129 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XosVSmu70%3D Occurrence Handle12474973
AE Derocher H Wolkers T Colborn M Schlabach TS Larsen InstitutionalAuthorNameWiig (2003) ArticleTitleContaminants in Svalbard polar bear samples archived since 1967 and possible population level effects Sci Total Environ 301 163–174 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XpsFSksLc%3D Occurrence Handle12493194
WS Fisher LM Oliver JT Winstead ER Long (2000) ArticleTitleA survey of oysters Crassostrea virginica from Tampa Bay, Florida: associations of internal defense measurements with contaminant burdens Aquat Toxicol 51 115–138 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmsFyqtLY%3D Occurrence Handle10998504
AT Fisk SA Tittlemier JL Pranschke RJ Norstrom (2002) ArticleTitleUsing anthropogenic contaminants and stable isotopes to assess the feeding ecology of greenland sharks Ecology 83 2162–2172
J Gelsleichter BG Steinetz CA Manire C Ange (2003) ArticleTitleSerum relaxin concentrations and reproduction in male bonnethead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo Gen Comp Endocrinol 132 27–34 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjvFWms7Y%3D Occurrence Handle12765641
J Gelsleichter LEL Rasmussen CA Manire J Tyminski B Chang L Lombardi-Carlson (2002) ArticleTitleSerum steroid concentrations and development of the reproductive system during puberty in male bonnethead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo Fish Physiol Biochem 26 389–401 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXpvVGnsr8%3D
LJ Guillette SuffixJr JW Brock AA Rooney AR Woodward (1999) ArticleTitleSerum concentrations of various environmental contaminants and their relationship to sex steroid concentrations and phallus size in juvenile American alligators Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 36 447–455 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXivFSmu7Y%3D Occurrence Handle10227864
KS Guruge M Watanabe H Tanaka S Tanabe (2001) ArticleTitleAccumulation status of persistent organochlorines in albatrosses from the North Pacific and the Southern Ocean Environ Pollut 114 389–398 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXlt1Slurs%3D Occurrence Handle11584637
S Hanchet (1988) ArticleTitleReproductive biology of Squalus acanthias from the east coast, South Island, New Zealand J Mar Freshwat Res 22 537–549
B Helander A Olsson A Bignert L Asplund K Litzen (2002) ArticleTitleThe role of DDE, PCB, coplanar PCB and eggshell parameters for reproduction in the white-tailed sea eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) in Sweden Ambio 31 386–403 Occurrence Handle12374047
EO Henriksen O Wiig JU Skaare GW Gabrielsen AE Derocher (2001) ArticleTitleMonitoring PCBs in polar bears: lessons learned from Svalbard J Environ Monit 3 493–498 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXnsVKrt78%3D Occurrence Handle11695117
JD Hutchinson MP Simmonds (1994) ArticleTitleOrganochlorine contamination in pinnipeds Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 136 123–167 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuA3c3jtFE%3D Occurrence Handle8029490
N Kajiwara K Kannan M Muraoka M Watanabe S Takahashi F Gulland H Olsen AL Blankenship PD Jones S Tanabe JP Giesy (2001) ArticleTitleOrganochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, and butyltin compounds in blubber and livers of stranded California sea lions, elephant seals, and harbor seals from coastal California, USA Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 41 90–99 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjvFyitbw%3D Occurrence Handle11385594
A Kumari RK Sinha K Gopal S Lata (2002) ArticleTitleConcentration of organochlorines in Ganges River dolphins from Patna, Bihar J Environ Biol 23 279–281 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xmsl2jtLg%3D Occurrence Handle12597572
BJ Le Boeuf JP Giesy K Kannan N Kajiwara S Tanabe C Debier (2002) ArticleTitleOrganochloride pesticides in California sea lions revisited BMC Ecol 2 11 Occurrence Handle12479795
E Lie A Bernhoft F Riget SE Belikov AN Boltunov AE Derocher GW Garner O Wiig JU Skaare (2003) ArticleTitleGeographical distribution of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Norwegian and Russian Arctic Sci Total Environ 306 159–170 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXivVOmsLo%3D Occurrence Handle12699924
LA Lombardi-Carlson E Cortés GR Parsons CA Manire (2004) ArticleTitleLatitudinal variation in life-history traits of bonnet head sharks, Sphyrna tiburo (Carcharhiniformes: Sphyrnidae) from the eastern Gulf of Mexico Mar Freshwat Res 54 875–883 Occurrence Handle10.1071/MF03023
JM Macauley JK Summers VD Engle LC Harwell (2002) ArticleTitleThe ecological condition of south Florida estuaries Environ Monit Assess 75 253–269 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XjslSqurs%3D Occurrence Handle12004979
CA Manire LE Rasmussen (1997) ArticleTitleSerum concentrations of steroid hormones in the mature male bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo Gen Comp Endocrinol 107 414–420 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXlslOqsbk%3D Occurrence Handle9268622
CA Manire LEL Rasmussen J Gelsleichter DL Hess (2004) ArticleTitleMaternal serum and yolk hormone concentrations in the placental viviparous bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo Gen Comp Endocrinol 136 241–247 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXitFKntLk%3D Occurrence Handle15028528
CA Manire LE Rasmussen TS Gross (1999) ArticleTitleSerum steroid hormones including 11-ketotestosterone, 11-ketoandrostenedione, and dihydroprogesterone in juvenile and adult bonnethead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo J Exp Zool 284 595–603 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXmt1Sjt7c%3D Occurrence Handle10469997
CA Manire LE Rasmussen DL Hess RE Hueter (1995) ArticleTitleSerum steroid hormones and the reproductive cycle of the female bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo Gen Comp Endocrinol 97 369–376 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gcen.1995.1036
GA McFarlane 1R King MW Saunders (2002) ArticleTitlePreliminary study on the use of neural arches in the age determination of blunt nose sixgill sharks (Hexanchus griseus) Fish Bull 100 861–864
PA Mills (1959) ArticleTitleDetection and semiquantitative estimation of chlorinated organic pesticide residues in foods by paper chromatography J AOAC 42 734–740 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaF3cXhvVOqsg%3D%3D
DC Muir EW Born K Koczansky GA Stern (2000) ArticleTitleTemporal and spatial trends of persistent organochlorines in Greenland walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) Sci Total Environ 245 73–86 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXksl2jsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10682357
InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Research Council (1999) Hormonally active agents in the environment National Academy Press Washington, DC
S Nichols J Gelsleichter CA Manire GM Cailliet (2003) ArticleTitleCalcitonin-like immunoreactivity in serum and tissues of the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo J Exp Zool 298 150–161 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jez.a.10271
LM Oliver WS Fisher JT Winstead BL Hemmer ER Long (2001) ArticleTitleRelationships between tissue contaminants and defense-related characteristics of oysters (Crassostrea virginica) from five Florida bays Aquat Toxicol 55 203–222 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXntlOqs7Y%3D Occurrence Handle11595310
GR Parsons (1983) ArticleTitleThe reproductive biology of the Atlantic sharpnose shark, Rhizoptionodon terranovae (Richardson) Fish Bull 81 61–73
GR Parsons (1993a) ArticleTitleGeographic variation in reproduction between two populations of the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo Environ BioI Fish 38 25–35 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00842901
GR Parsons (1993b) ArticleTitleAge determination and growth of the bonnethead shark Sphyrna tiburo: a comparison of two populations Mar Biol 117 23–31 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00346422
PH Santschi BJ Presley TL Wade B Garcia-Romero M Baskaran (2001) ArticleTitleHistorical contamination of PAHs, PCBs, DDTs, and heavy metals in Mississippi River Delta, Galveston Bay and Tampa Bay sediment cores Mar Environ Res 52 51–79 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXktVSls70%3D Occurrence Handle11488356
GI Scott MH Fulton EF Wirth GT Chandler PB Key JW Daugomah D Bearden KW Chung ED Strozier M DeLorenzo S Sivertsen A Dias M Sanders JM Macauley LR Goodman MW LaCroix GW Thayer J Kucklick (2002) ArticleTitleToxicological studies in tropical ecosystems: an ecotoxicological risk assessment of pesticide runoff in South Florida estuarine ecosystems J Agric Food Chern 50 4400–4408 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xks12rsbw%3D
DJ Seagars J Garlich-Miller (2001) ArticleTitleOrganochlorine compounds and aliphatic hydrocarbons in Pacific walrus blubber Mar Pollut Bull 43 122–131 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXmsFSqurc%3D Occurrence Handle11601530
Seal TL, Calder FD, Sloane GM, Schropps SJ, Windom HL (1994) Florida coastal sediment contaminants atlas. Florida Department of Environmental Protection
R Serrano MA Fernandez LM Hernandez M Hernandez P Pascual RM Rabanal MJ Gonzalez (1997) ArticleTitleCoplanar polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in shark livers from the North-Western African Atlantic Ocean Bull Environ Contam Toxical 58 150–157 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjsVCj
R Serrano M Fernandez R Rabanal M Hernandez MJ Gonzalez (2000) ArticleTitleCongener-specific determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in shark and grooper livers from the northwest African Atlantic Ocean Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 38 217–224 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhtFemsb8%3D Occurrence Handle10629285
P Stefanelli A Ausili G Ciuffa A Colasanti S Di Muccio R Morlino (2002) ArticleTitleInvestigation of polychlorobiphenyls and organochlorine pesticides in tissues of tuna (Thunnus thunnus thynnus) from the Mediterranean Sea in 1999 Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 69 800–807 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XoslOrsLc%3D Occurrence Handle12428156
MM Storelli GO Marcotrigiano (2000) ArticleTitleChlorobiphenyls, HCB, and organochlorine pesticides in some tissues of Caretta caretta (Linnaeus) specimens beached along the Adriatic Sea, Italy Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 64 481–488 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXislSjtr0%3D Occurrence Handle10754043
MM Storelli GO Marcotrigiano (2001) ArticleTitlePersistent organochlorine residues and toxic evaluation of polychlorinated biphenyls in sharks from the Mediterranean Sea (Italy) Mar Pollut Bull 42 1323–1329 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXovFGgtLg%3D Occurrence Handle11827119
MM Storelli E Ceci A Storelli GO Marcotrigiano (2003a) ArticleTitlePolychlorinated biphenyl, heavy metal and methylmercury residues in hammerhead sharks: contaminant status and assessment Mar Pollut Bull 46 1035–1039 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXmtVSlur8%3D
MM Storelli A Storelli GO Marcotrigiano (2003b) ArticleTitleCoplanar polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in the liver of Galeus melastomus from different areas of the Mediterranean Sea Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 71 276–282 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXmsFGmtrc%3D
S Tanabe (2002) ArticleTitleContamination and toxic effects of persistent endocrine disrupters in marine mammals and birds Mar Pollut Bull 45 69–77 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xms1Kju70%3D Occurrence Handle12398369
BP Tangredi RH Evans (1997) ArticleTitleOrganochlorine pesticides associated with ocular, nasal, or otic infection in the eastern box turtle (Terravene carolina carolina) J Zoo Wild Med 28 97–100 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA2s%2FisVM%3D
KL Tilbury JE Stein CA Krone RL Brownell SuffixJr SA Blokhin JL Bolton DW Ernest (2002) ArticleTitleChemical contaminants in juvenile gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) from a subsistence harvest in Arctic feeding grounds Chemosphere 47 555–564 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XisV2itbY%3D Occurrence Handle12047066
D Ueno D Deno H Iwata S Tanabe K Ikeda J Koyama H Yamada (2002) ArticleTitleSpecific accumulation of persistent organochlorines in bluefin tuna collected from Japanese coastal waters Mar Pollut Bull 45 254–261 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xms1Kis7k%3D Occurrence Handle12398393
W Vetter E Scholz C Gaus JF Muller D Haynes (2001) ArticleTitleAnthropogenic and natural organohalogen compounds in blubber of dolphins and dugongs (Dugong dugon) from northeastern Australia Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 41 221–231 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXlsFWlsLk%3D Occurrence Handle11462147
JD Webber JJ Cech (1998) ArticleTitleNondestructive diet analysis of the leopard shark from two sites in Tomales Bay, California Calif Fish Game 84 18–24
TH Wu TR Rainwater SG Platt ST McMurry TA Anderson (2000a) ArticleTitleDDE in eggs of two crocodile species from Belize J Agric Food Chem 48 6416–6420 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXotl2ntLs%3D
TH Wu TR Rainwater SG Platt ST McMurry TA Anderson (2000b) ArticleTitleOrganochlorine contaminants in Morelet’s crocodile (Crocodylus moreletii) eggs from Belize Chemosphere 40 671–678 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXht12ntbk%3D
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge John Tyminski and numerous undergraduate student interns for participating in field sampling and animal collection procedures. This project was funded by Environmental Protection Agency grant #R826128-01-0 to CAM and a grant from the Mote Scientific Foundation to JG. Although the research described in this article has been funded in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, it has not been subjected to the Agency’s required peer and policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gelsleichter, J., Manire, C.A., Szabo, N.J. et al. Organochlorine Concentrations in Bonnethead Sharks (Sphyrna tiburo) from Four Florida Estuaries. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48, 474–483 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-003-0275-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-003-0275-2