Introduction

One of the most abundant and diverse groups in marine sediments consists of benthic foraminifera (Protista: Granuloreticulosa) (Thiel 1975; Gooday 1986; Alongi and Pichon 1988; Altenbach and Sarnthein 1989). These single-celled organisms can exist in nearly all marine environments, including deep-sea areas and extreme ecosystems (e.g. Gooday et al. 1992; Linke and Lutze 1993; Kitazato 1994; Sen Gupta and Aharon 1994). Benthic foraminifera are useful indicators of ecological variability, because their species composition, abundance, and distributional pattern mainly depend on environmental conditions. Taxa can be used as indicators of distinct sediment facies or particular hydrographic conditions (Lohmann 1978; Lutze 1980; Lutze and Coulborn 1984). Additionally, organic carbon flux is one of the main environmental factors controlling benthic foraminiferal distribution patterns (Altenbach 1988; Loubere 1996, 1997; Schmiedl et al. 1997). In oligotrophic areas some opportunistic species react very quickly to seasonal phytodetritus pulses arriving on the sediment surface (Gooday 1988, 1993; Smart and Gooday 1997). Another important parameter is the oxygen supply (Jorissen et al. 1995; Loubere 1994, 1997; Ohga and Kitazato 1997). Most of these factors are related to water depth and depend on bathymetric conditions.

Seamounts generate a habitat that has hardly been explored in research on living benthic foraminifera in deep-sea areas. Yet these unique ecosystems promise interesting findings that may explain interactions between environment and community structure. They show a high variability of environmental properties, like water depth, temperature, current systems, trophic conditions, and sediments, at a rather small scale. This might lead to the development of ecological niches and biological zoning. Seamounts can act as obstacles to current flow. They interact with ocean currents and create flow complexities that are determined by current speed, stratification, latitude, and seamount morphology (Boehlert and Genin 1987). The physical effects include local small- and mesoscale phenomena like the formation of eddies and circular currents (“Taylor column”), turbulent mixing, benthic boundary effects, and regional up- or downwelling. Some of these factors may increase local primary and secondary production, or trap particles, nutrients, or organisms. Seamounts can be biologically highly productive and highly diverse in species composition (Simpson and Heydorn 1965, Hughes 1981, Rogers 1994). They are separated from the abyssal plain and may act as underwater islands (Boehlert and Genin 1987) or “stepping-stones” for trans-oceanic dispersal (Wilson and Kaufmann 1987).

Only a few studies exist that deal with recent benthic foraminiferal assemblages at seamounts. Nienstedt and Arnold (1988) report about a direct influence of depth-related hydrographic factors on the foraminiferal community. Gradual changes were observed, except for distinct faunal shifts at the oxygen-minimum zone and at the carbonate compensation depth (CCD). In contrast, Ohkushi and Natori (2001) found very different foraminiferal populations at two seamounts in the same hydrographic structures, probably caused by varying trophic conditions. Benthic foraminifera are important tools for investigations on stratigraphy, paleoproductivity, paleoecology, and paleoceanography. Despite little knowledge about foraminiferal assemblages in seamount ecosystems, in paleoecological studies and reconstructions the occurrence of warm water and shallow water biota have been interpreted as evidence for seamounts (Buening et al. 1998). To avoid wrong interpretations, mainly caused by unknown microhabitat preferences or vital effects, it is essential to understand the biology and ecology of extant foraminiferal species. Investigations dealing with recent foraminiferal assemblages in such habitats are urgently needed.

In the present study, we document the record of foraminiferal assemblages found at the Great Meteor Seamount (eastern North Atlantic). Sediment sampling on several transects in August 1998 enabled us to compare communities of living benthic foraminifera from the plateau of Great Meteor Seamount (290–325 m water depth) and from the surrounding deep sea at the base of the slope (2,300–3,100 m). These communities were compared with one reference station at the abyssal plain (4,096 m water depth) north of the seamount. The analysis of the organic carbon content (Corg) in the sediment provided information about the trophic conditions at these sites. We had three central questions: (1) what kinds of populations can be found at the seamount? (2) Are there differences in the diversity and species composition at the various sites? (3) If so, which factors might regulate these differences?

Material and methods

Study area and sampling

Sediment samples containing living benthic foraminifera were collected at Great Meteor Seamount during R.V. “Meteor” cruise M 42/3 in August 1998. This seamount is of volcanic origin and reaches from the abyssal plain to 270 m below the water surface, with a rather flat plateau top of approximately 50 km in diameter (Hinz 1969; Thiel 1970; Ulrich 1971; Ehrich 1977). It was under investigation for several studies, and topography, morphology, and hydrography are well known (e.g. Hinz 1969; Horn et al. 1971; Ulrich 1971; Dietrich et al. 1994; Grevemeyer 1994; Mourino et al. 2001).

A multicorer (after Barnett et al. 1984) was used for sampling deep-sea stations at the base of the slope (2,300–3,100 m) and at the abyssal plain, where sediments were of silt and clay. Because of coarse and hard substrate at the plateau, it was not possible to get sediments with a multicorer here. Instead, a giant box corer was used (after Hessler and Jumars 1974). Directly after the arrival of the box corer on board, overlaying bottom water was gently removed. The water that covered the sediment in the box corer was always slightly cloudy, but sediment surface did not appear notably disturbed. Sediment in the box corer was subsampled by pushing Plexiglas cores into it. Sediment that was not enclosed in these tubes was removed by hand. Sampling sites are shown in Fig. 1 and a list of these together with investigated parameters is given in Table 1. The slopes of Great Meteor Seamount were too rocky and too steep to get any samples.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study area and sampling sites (filled circles foraminifera and Corg data available; open circles Corg data available)

Table 1 Sampling sites and data collected at Great Meteor Seamount. BC box corer, MC multicorer

Benthic foraminifera and particle size

Core diameter was between 60 and 95 mm (details are given in Table 1). One core was studied for faunal analysis at each station. All cores were cut at 0.5-cm intervals until 3 cm sediment depth and in 1-cm intervals below 3 cm depth until 10 cm (if possible, because some of the box corer subsamples were shorter). Here we present results of the surface sediment layers (0–1 cm), except for one comparison of foraminiferal densities at two stations carried out to 3 cm sediment depth (Fig. 7). Deeper sediment layers are under investigation. Sampled sediment volume was between 14 and 35 cm3. For faunal analysis, each layer was preserved separately with ethanol and stained with rose bengal (1 g rose bengal per 1 l ethanol) for at least 14 days to distinguish living (containing red-stained protoplasm) from dead foraminifera (after Walton 1952). The sediment was washed and the residue was dried to make the following handling more practicable and to allow the storage of the sediments for a longer period of time. Dried sediment was fractionated in three different size classes: 30–63 μm, >63–125 μm, and >125 μm. All fractions were weighed for particle size analysis. Sediment sample splits (1/2–1/1 splits) of the two larger fractions were investigated for living foraminifera and all red-coloured individuals were picked. To minimise wrongly identified living foraminifera, specimens were individually wetted with water and only foraminifera containing well-stained dark-red protoplasm were counted. Numbers of living foraminifera in each slice were referenced to 10 cm3. The smallest fraction (30–63 μm) is under investigation.

Organic carbon

Surface sediments (0–1 cm) were taken and immediately frozen until analysis. Sediment was dried at 50°C and ground. Part of the sediment was decalcified with 1 N HCl. Percentage of total carbonate and total carbon of untreated and decalcified sediments was determined with a carbon analyser (Elementar Vario EL, Elementar Analysesysteme, Germany) and gasometric analysis. Finally, percentage of organic carbon was calculated. Accuracy was between 0.02 and 0.04 wt%.

Oxygen content measurements

At two deep stations, oxygen profiles in sediment cores were measured directly after arriving on board. Analysis was done with an oxygen microelectrode and measurement system (MasCom, Bremen, Germany). Linear calibration of the electrode signal was obtained with an oxymetre OXI 340/A (WTW, Germany), with air-saturated seawater and O2-free seawater, degassed with N2. Calibration solutions had the same temperature as measured core sediments.

Statistical analysis

For all foraminiferal community analysis procedures, the abundance data were calculated as individuals per 10 cm3. Diversity H(S) was determined according to the Shannon Wiener index (Shannon and Weaver 1963). S is the number of observed species. Equitability was calculated as e H(S)/S (Buzas and Gibson 1969). When species are totally equally distributed, the ratio reaches its maximum value of 1. Large tubular agglutinated foraminifera, such as Rhizammina algaeformis or related species, easily break into fragments during handling and are difficult to count. Three size-standardised fragments (with a fragment size of 1,000–4,000 μm) of tubular agglutinated forms were used to define a single specimen to gain a semiquantitative number (Kurbjeweit et al. 2000). Q-mode principal component analysis was carried out with SYSTAT 5.2.1. Only species constituting more than 0.5% in one of the samples were used. Factor loadings of 0.5 for the Q-mode principal component analysis were considered as significant (Backhaus et al. 1989).

Results

Particle size

Size distribution of sediment particles of the dried and sieved fractions 30–63 μm, >63–125 μm, and >125 μm are given in Fig. 2. In all cores, particles >125 μm made up the largest part of the dried sediment (after the fine fractions <30 μm were washed out and discarded). At the shallow water stations, very high percentages of the coarse fraction were recorded—between 80 and >90%—and smaller grain sizes made up only 2–12%. All deep stations contained fewer particles >125 μm (percentages of 48–70% were found), but higher masses of smaller grains.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Grain size distribution at different stations. St station

Organic carbon

Generally, this area was very oligotrophic. Surface sediments (0–1 cm) were characterised by considerable high carbonate concentrations and low Corg content. Very small amounts of Corg were measured directly at the plateau (Fig. 3). Values were observed between 0.012 and 0.038 wt%. At the deep stations around Great Meteor Seamount, more elevated values were recorded in the surface sediments (0.067–0.103 wt%). In the northern abyssal plain (station 558, see Fig. 1), comparable amounts of Corg were measured, around 0.060 wt%. All available data points were taken to simulate area-wide gradients of Corg in this region (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Organic carbon content (wt%) in surface sediments and gradient simulation

Pore water oxygen

Direct sediment oxygen concentrations were only available at two deep stations, 506 and 459 (Fig. 4). Profiles measured in 1-mm steps showed highest oxygen content at the surface (about 6.7–6.8 ml l−1) and decreasing values with increasing sediment depth. At station 506, oxygen concentration seemed to diminish faster than at station 459. Nevertheless, both cores contained high amounts of oxygen in the pore water and showed a good aeration of the sediment in the upper first 3 cm.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Vertical oxygen concentration profiles in multicorer sediment samples

Foraminiferal abundance

Densities of living benthic foraminifera in surface sediments (0–1 cm) are shown in Figs. 5 and 6. Total numbers and counts separated into the fractions >63–125 μm and >125 μm are given in Fig. 5. All available data points were taken to simulate area-wide gradients of foraminiferal densities in this region (Fig. 6). Generally, abundances were very low, but stations showed variability. On average, we found more living individuals at the deeper stations in the first centimetre. Highest densities were observed at the reference station 556 at the abyssal plain north of the seamount (47 individuals in 10 cm3) and at the deep stations south and east of the seamount plateau, at station 566 (28 individuals in 10 cm3) and station 548 (37 individuals in 10 cm3). At the other two deep stations, distinctly lower numbers of living foraminifera were counted (10–12 individuals/10 cm3), even lower than in most of the shallow-water sediments. At the plateau, generally elevated quantities were observed in the north (22 individuals/10 cm3 at station 467) and the lowest densities with only 4 individuals/10 cm3 southwest of the plateau centre at station 456. Dominant size extent in most of the surface sediments was the fraction >63–125 μm.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Foraminiferal densities (in total and fractions) in the surface sediment at different stations

Fig. 6
figure 6

Foraminiferal densities (n/10 cm3) in surface sediments and gradient simulation

At two stations, deeper sediment layers were also investigated for living foraminifera. A comparison of the vertical distribution down to 3-cm sediment depth at one plateau station (station 467) and one deep station (station 548) is given in Fig. 7. Living foraminifera were still found in deeper sediment layers at station 548; in particular, bigger foraminifera increased between 0.5 and 2.0 cm sediment depth.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Vertical distribution pattern of living benthic foraminifera at two stations

Species composition

A comparison of the number of species, diversity, and equitability at single stations is given in Fig. 8. At the bank, most stations showed an elevated species diversity, between 2.5 and 3.2. Only station 456 southwest of the plateau centre had a strikingly lower diversity. Equitability is mainly high, between 0.5 and 0.9. The reference station 558 presented lower diversity and equitability compared to seamount sediments.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Diversity H(S), number of species (S) and equitability (e) of living benthic foraminifera

In total, 93 taxa were identified in the surface sediments of the nine stations (raw data sets can be found in the Appendix), but only 43 species were found at more than one station. Table 2 compares these species. Taxa in Table 2 can be classified into four groups: (I) species exclusively recorded on the plateau; (II) species observed in both habitats, shallow and deep stations; (III) species found only at the deep stations (including the abyssal reference station 558); (IV) species solely counted at the deep stations of the seamount base. Species of group I were dominated by taxa that form calcareous tests. In groups III and IV, the number of agglutinated species increased.

Table 2 Comparison of species that were found at more than one station (number/10 cm3). Taxa can be classified into four groups: (I) species exclusively recorded on the plateau; (II) species observed in both habitats, shallow and deep stations; (III) species found only at the deep stations (including the abyssal reference station 558); (IV) species solely counted at the deep stations of the seamount base

A principal component analysis (not shown) demonstrated that every station was characterised by its own faunal community, with low numbers of individuals of many species. Dominant species of single stations were often observed at other stations, too. At the reference station 558, Eponides tumidulus (calcareous species, C) dominated the community. Major taxa at station 459 were Trochammina conglobata (agglutinated species, A) and Rhizammina algaeformis (A), and at station 566 Hoeglundina elegans (C) and Glomospira gordialis (A). Cassidulina grassa (C) mainly influenced station 548. Epistominella exigua (C) and Ammobacculites filiformis (A) controlled station 506. Except for H. elegans and C. grassa, all dominant species at the deep stations were only found in deep station sediments. On the plateau, all main characteristic taxa were also found at deep stations. Station 516 was dominated by T. inflata (A), station 456 again by H. elegans (C), and station 489 and 467 by Eggerelloides sp. (A).

Discussion and conclusions

Habitat characterisation

Great Meteor Seamount represents an isolated barrier in the abyssal plain that surely influences local ocean currents. The seamount lies within the southwestwards-flowing cold Canary current system, and a weak northeasterly directed bottom current includes small amounts of Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW; von Stackelberg et al. 1979). Sediment particle size distribution at the shallow plateau stations and in surrounding deep stations displays a more coarse sediment at the plateau (Fig. 2). One reason for this may be faster bottom water currents above the plateau that remove and wash out clayey and silty small material from these sediments. In March 1992, Mourino et al. (2001) observed that water and its components was flushed off the bank rather than removed by local eddy diffusion from an anticyclonic vortex. The more elevated organic carbon content in sediments of the deep sites, compared to plateau sediments, supports this thesis. Higher levels of organic material in the abyssal plain may be induced by an accumulation of material during lateral and vertical transport and resuspension processes. Calculated organic carbon data are very low, and interpretations have to be made carefully because of the limitation of the precision of measurements. Still, considerably higher values can be found at all deeper stations, compared to the plateau.

Generally, high oxygen content and very low organic carbon content in the surface sediments indicate an oligotrophic environment above the seamount and in its surroundings (Figs. 3, 4). This agrees well with other published observations. Great Meteor Seamount is located in the biogeochemical province of the subtropical eastern Gyre (Sathyendranath et al. 1995). This province has a low estimated primary production, between 88 and 140 g C m−2 year−1 (Yentsch 1990; Platt et al. 1995; Sathyendranath et al. 1995). Nutrients measured during cruise M 42-3 (August 1998) showed low values of nitrate, ammonia, phosphate, and silica in the upper 100–150 m water column and increasing concentrations with increasing water depth (Pfannkuche et al. 2000). Weak seasonal fluctuations and local increases of chlorophyll a can be observed during the year, associated with the seamount (Mourino et al. 2001). Relatively high values of primary production (36 mg C m−2 h−1, integrated over the upper 130 m), and chlorophyll a (46 mg m−2, integrated over the upper 150 m) were found in August 1998, compared to other seasons and years (Mourino et al. 2001). In oligotrophic areas, seasonal changes of food availability may influence foraminiferal densities, species composition, vertical distribution in the sediment, population dynamics, and reproduction cycles of benthic foraminifera. Some opportunistic species (like Epistominella exigua) react very quickly to phytodetritus blooms arriving on the sediment surface; they respond with a high increase in abundance due to reproduction and rapidly colonize freshly deposited phytodetrital aggregates (Gooday 1988, 1993; Gooday and Lambshead 1989; Gooday and Turley 1990; Smart and Gooday 1997). E. exigua can be observed in our samples (Table 2), but only at deep stations. They are common but do not dominate these sediments in high amounts. Probably no strong phytodetritus pulse recently arrived on the sea floor here.

Unfortunately, oxygen profiles of sediments were only available for two deep stations (Fig. 4), and no measurements were possible on the plateau, since the coarse sediment would had damaged glass microelectrodes. We assume that the other deep stations had similarly high pore water oxygen content, because only low amounts of organic material were deposited on the sediment (even lower compared to stations with existing oxygen profiles) and were decomposed by oxygen-consuming degradation processes. Mourino et al. (2001) measured high oxygen concentrations in the water column near the seafloor on the summit, about 4.7 ml l−1. This bottom-water concentration indicates high oxygen content in the plateau sediment surface. Additionally, very low amounts of organic matter and coarse sediments support this.

Salinity of bottom water on the plateau of Great Meteor Seamount was between 36.0 and 36.2 (Pfannkuche et al. 2000; Mourino et al. 2001). At the deep stations around the seamount, in water depths below 2,000 m, values between 34.9 and 35.1 were measured in conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) profiles (Pfannkuche et al. 2000). Water temperature near the sediment floor at the shallow plateau stations was about 14–16°C, and 2–4°C in water depths deeper than 2,000 m (Pfannkuche et al. 2000; Mourino et al. 2001).

Total foraminiferal densities

In general, living benthic foraminifera were found in low amounts on and in the surroundings of Great Meteor Seamount, which is typical of oligotrophic regions. Comparison between foraminiferal abundances of plateau and deep station sediments showed reduced densities southwest of the plateau centre, in the lee side of the seamount, and considerable increased numbers north, east, and south of the seamount (Figs. 5, 6). All other stations showed more gradual differences.

Benthic foraminiferal densities reported from depth transect studies at basins or at the continental slope also included sediments from different water depths. In contrast to our results, they showed significantly higher foraminiferal abundances in the upper stations but comparable low numbers at deep stations. However, a direct comparison is sometimes difficult because of diverse investigated size fractions and sediment depths and different environmental conditions influencing the benthos in these regions. Rathburn and Corliss (1994) found comparable low foraminiferal numbers (size >63 μm) at depth transects in the Zulu Sea in water depths deeper than 3,000 m. In other depth transect studies, similar low densities were detected at shallower depths, depending, for example, on food or oxygen availability (e.g. De Stigter et al. 1998; Jannink et al. 1998; Fontanier et al. 2002).

Foraminiferal communities of only one sediment core were studied at each station of Great Meteor Seamount. Analysing one multicorer core for each station is usual and acceptable for field investigations on living benthic foraminifera, which are very time consuming, especially when they include important small size fractions such as the fraction >63–125 μm included in this study. A compromise has to be found between what is practicable, realisable, and utilisable. Small-scale patchiness cannot be disregarded and some of the differences between sites could be due to small-scale variability. Small-scale patch structures were noted for benthic foraminifera in the abyssal realm (Bernstein et al. 1978; Bernstein and Meador 1979), probably due to habitat selection, reproductive patterns, and small-scale patchiness of food supply and sampling procedure. Additionally, different gear was used for sampling deep stations and plateau stations. Box corers can never sample sediments totally undisturbed, as can multicorer sampling. Epifaunal to shallow infaunal taxa, like Adercotryma glomerata, Hoeglundina elegans, and Spiroplectammina species, can be found in the first sediment layer in both multicorer and box corer samples. Additionally, infaunal species were present, such as Trochammina inflata. Therefore, it is not possible to assess with certainty if surface sediments were lost in the box corers. Nevertheless, we believe that strong differences in foraminiferal densities, as observed for stations 558, 548, and 456, indicate enhanced or decreased populations in these regions.

Bottom waters and measured pore waters in the sediments show high available oxygen concentrations for benthic organism, that surely do not limit foraminiferal densities at Great Meteor Seamount. Other environmental factors, such as temperature, water depth, salinity, and sediment composition, were constant between single stations inside the two habitats, “plateau” and “surrounding deep stations”, and were probably not the cause of the differences in foraminiferal densities inside these habitats. Generally, benthic foraminifera are strongly influenced by surface ocean productivity and organic carbon flux to the sea bed (e.g. Gooday 1988; Altenbach and Sarnthein 1989). We assume that organic carbon fluxes and distribution of fresh arriving phytodetritus at the sea floor, controlled by water currents, is one important factor controlling foraminiferal populations inside and even between the two habitats at this seamount. In our study, increased and decreased foraminiferal densities did not always directly match with elevated or alleviated organic carbon content in the sediment surface, but trends can be recognised. Lowest numbers of individuals correlated with lowest Corg values at station 456 southwest of the plateau centre. Station 516 and 489 in the east and west of the plateau showed very similar foraminiferal abundances, in agreement with comparable Corg concentrations. But in the north, at station 467, very low amounts of organic material were measured, whereas the highest densities of foraminifera at the plateau were recorded here. At the same time, the next northern station 452 indicated again increased Corg data. At the deep stations, more elevated Corg content was found in surface layers, compared to the plateau sediments. Highest concentrations were observed northeast and southwest of the seamount. But these stations showed low foraminiferal densities. We should keep in mind that analysed Corg data can only roughly mirror nutrient conditions for benthic organisms, because these data contain the sum of all organic material arrived, produced, and decomposed at the seafloor and do not reveal anything about the decomposition state or phytodetritus arriving at the floor, which is the intrinsic food source. We can speculate that arriving food material at some stations was enough to trigger an increase of foraminiferal densities but not intense enough to be preserved in high amounts in surface sediments. Asymmetric sedimentation around Great Meteor Seamount was found by von Stackelberg et al. (1979). They explained higher sedimentation rates east of the bank with decreased bottom-water flow velocities in this area. Increased sedimentation of nutrient particles east of the bank would justify higher foraminiferal densities here. It is well known that in deep-sea areas, some species can react very quickly to phytodetritus arriving on the sediment surface (Gooday 1988, 1993; Smart and Gooday 1997). The biomass of benthic foraminifera has been reported to correlate well with the estimated organic carbon flux (Altenbach and Sarnthein 1989; Altenbach et al. 1999). In laboratory experiments, the addition of organic material resulted in a rise of biomass, a higher number of food vacuoles (Altenbach 1992; Linke et al. 1995), and increased foraminiferal densities (Heinz et al. 2001, 2002).

Vertical distribution

The comparison of vertical distribution patterns of living foraminifera at the two stations 467 and 548 (Fig. 7) shows higher densities in deep sediment layers at the deep station 548, where we found high oxygen content and more elevated Corg values in the sediment, compared to the plateau station. This observation agrees with the predictions of the trophic-oxygen-microhabitat-reaction model of foraminiferal microhabitats (TROX model, after Jorissen et al. 1995; Fontanier et al. 2002). According to this model, the vertical occurrence of benthic foraminifera in oligotrophic areas is limited by low food supply. The oxygen concentration is high in deeper sediment layers and will not limit foraminiferal distribution, but the lack of organic matter causes the foraminifera to stay near the sediment surface. At station 467, live foraminifera are restricted to the surface because of nutrient limitation. At station 548, increased food supply can improve foraminiferal numbers in deeper sediment layers. Probably, living foraminifera can even be found deeper than 3 cm in the sediment here. Deeper sediment layers from this and other stations are currently under investigation. Other environmental factors, such as sediment physical characteristics, shear stress, porosity, or different pore water chemistry may additionally influence and limit vertical distribution.

Species composition

At all stations, comparable high diversity was observed with relatively balanced species distribution in each core, except for station 456, where only a few individuals were found, and the reference station 588, where Eponides tumidulus very strongly dominates the foraminiferal community (Fig. 8). This high diversity is typical of oligotrophic deep-sea regions. We did not determine endemic species at Great Meteor Seamount. The foraminiferal fauna showed bathyal characteristics and was very similar to assemblages previously described from other parts of the North Atlantic (e.g. Lutze 1980; Murray 1991; Timm 1992; Gooday 1993), and other oceans (e.g. Kurbjeweit et al. 2000; Timm 1992). Every station was characterised by its own faunal community, with low numbers of individuals of many species, and only 43 of the 93 identified taxa were found at more than one station (Table 2). No species appeared at all sampled sediments. The most common species were found in both habitats, on the plateau and in the surrounding deep sediments of the Great Meteor Seamount (group II), but we found a large number of taxa that appeared only at the deep stations and established a typical deep-sea assemblage (groups III and IV), and a few species that formed a characteristic plateau faunal community that was found exclusively on the plateau stations and separated these stations from the deep sea (group I). Environmental factors such as temperature, water depth, salinity, and sediment composition were constant between single stations inside the two habitats but showed variations between the habitats, which may explain the restriction of some taxa to one habitat. Substrate types can influence foraminiferal assemblages at the shelf and the spread of single species can be correlated with specific sediment grain size (Haake 1977; Lutze 1980; Lutze and Coulbourn 1984; Hempel 1985; Schiebel 1992; Levy et al. 1993). This can be observed, for example, for attached epifaunal surface-dwelling species and coarsely agglutinated foraminifera (Schmiedl 1995; Schmiedl et al. 1997). In our investigations, species forming a characteristic plateau faunal community do not belong to these taxa. Some of the plateau taxa have been described as living in shelf to upper bathyal water depths, for example, Trifarina species (Murray 1991), found at station 489, or Bolivina pygmaea (Jones 1994; see Table 2) and probably are restricted to more shallow water depths. Spiroplectinella sagittula was found in the shelf edge association at the southern Portuguese continental margin (Schönfeld 1997). Foraminifera, particularly small individuals such as juveniles and small taxa, may easily be dispersed by water currents (Alve 1999). It is conceivable that shelf and slope foraminifera can be transported in resuspended sediment materials driven by water currents from the coast of western Europe or western Africa to the Great Meteor Seamount. There have been observations of foraminifera living on submarine plants that were uprooted during storms or other impacts and were transported offshore to float in the open sea. As an example, T. carinata living along the Argentina coast on the seaweed Macrocystis pyrifera was transported to the north by the Malvin Current (Boltovskoy and Lena 1969).

All taxa of group II, living in both habitats, seamount plateau and surrounding deep sea, must show high flexibility and no specialisation. They are very tolerant and proliferate in regions that are very different in hydrographic factors such as temperature, water depth, pressure, grain size distribution, and age and degradation state of the arriving organic material. All these genera have been described from other marine regions showing a broad bathymetric range with distribution patterns between shelf and bathyal to abyssal water depths (e.g. Murray 1991; De Stigter et al. 1998). Taxa observed exclusively at the deep stations of Great Meteor Seamount probably prefer environmental conditions related to deeper water conditions. They can be divided into groups III (taxa of all deep stations, including the abyssal reference station 558) and IV (species found solely at the base of the seamount). Group IV cannot be interpreted as a particular seamount assemblage that generally is able to characterise seamount sediments. Most of the taxa of groups II–IV were reported as well in other deep-sea field studies carried out in different oceans, for example the Arabian Sea (Kurbjeweit et al. 2000; Heinz and Hemleben 2003), and show global distribution. Much accordance in species spectra (but not in dominance) can be observed between Great Meteor Seamount taxa of groups II–IV and seamount studies near the East Pacific Rise (Nienstedt and Arnold 1988) or central North Pacific (Ohkushi and Natori 2001), in which sediments were analysed below 788 m water depth. Several corresponding taxa (Adercotryma glomerata, Epistominella exigua, Globocassidulina subglobosa, Lagenammina (Reophax) difflugiformis, Pullenia bulloides, Pyrgo murrhyna, Reophax scorpiurus) can be found in all of these studies. Yet, again, these species are not restricted to seamount areas but can live in many marine bathyal to abyssal sediments.

Conclusions

Living benthic foraminiferal assemblages collected on several transects at the Great Meteor Seamount (eastern North Atlantic) were examined. Abundances, diversity, and species composition in surface sediments were compared between the plateau of Great Meteor Seamount (290–325 m water depth), the surrounding deep sea at the base of the slope (2,300–3,100 m), and one reference station at the abyssal plain (4,096 m) north of the seamount. Environmental factors (sediment particles, organic carbon content, oxygen) were included in our investigations. Low foraminiferal densities, high diversities, and low vertical distribution were recorded, which mirrors oligotrophic conditions. Local variations in abundances (reduced numbers southwest of the plateau centre and on the lee side of the seamount, increased values north, east, and south of the seamount) were probably due to differences in the distribution of fresh organic material, caused by local oceanic currents around Great Meteor Seamount. Generally, plateau stations indicated more coarse sediments and lower organic carbon content, which suggest faster bottom water currents above the plateau that flushed off the bank water and its components. No endemic species were observed at Great Meteor Seamount. The foraminiferal fauna showed bathyal to abyssal characteristics and similarities to assemblages previously described from other parts of the North Atlantic and other oceans. Taxa can be classified into four groups, establishing a plateau fauna (probably restricted to more shallow water depths), two deep-sea assemblages (probably preferring environmental conditions related to deeper water conditions), and a group that can be observed in both habitats (showing high flexibility and no specialisation). Identified taxa have been reported from other marine environments and are not restricted to seamount areas.