Abstract
In anesthetized and paralyzed cats under artificial respiration, we examined the extent to which primary afferent depolarization (PAD) might affect invasion of action potentials in intraspinal axonal and/or terminal branches of single muscle afférents. To this end, one stimulating micropipette was placed at the L6 spinal level within the intermediate or motor nucleus, and another one at the L3 level, in or close to Clarke’s column. Antidromically conducted responses produced in single muscle afférents by stimulation at these two spinal levels were recorded from fine lateral gastrocnemius nerve filaments. In all fibers examined, stimulation of one branch, with strengths producing action potentials, increased the intraspinal threshold of the other branch when applied at short conditioning testing stimulus intervals (< 1.5–2.0 ms), because of the refractoriness produced by the action potentials invading the tested branch. Similar increases in the intraspinal threshold were found in branches showing tonic PAD and also during the PAD evoked by stimulation of group I afferent fibers in muscle nerves. It is concluded that during tonic or evoked PAD, axonal branches in the dorsal columns and myelinated terminals of muscle afférents ending deep in the L6 and L3 segmental levels continue to be invaded by action potentials. These findings strengthen the view that presynaptic inhibition of muscle afférents produced by activation of GABAergic mechanisms is more likely to result from changes in the synaptic effectiveness of the afferent terminals than from conduction failure because of PAD.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bagust J, Kerkut GA, Rakkeh NIA (1989) The dorsal root reflex in isolated mammalian spinal cord. Comp Biochem Physiol 93:151–160
Blight AR, Someya S (1985) Depolarizing afterpotentials in myelinated axon of mammalian spinal cord. Soc Neurosci Abstr 15:1–12
Castillo L, Lomeli J, Linares P, Rudomin P (1998) Does PAD block spike invasion to axonal branches of individual group I afférents? Soc Neurosci Abstr 24:1152
Gossard JP (1995) Do antidromic discharges in primary afférents have postsynaptic effects? Soc Neurosci Abstr 21:414
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published online: 10 October 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lomelí, J., Castillo, L., Linares, P. et al. Effects of pad on conduction of action potentials within segmental and ascending branches of single muscle afférents in the cat spinal cord. Exp Brain Res 135, 204–214 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210000524
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210000524