Abstract
Rationale
The serotonin (5-HT) 2A receptor is implicated in numerous psychiatric disorders, making it an important, clinically relevant target. Despite the availability of transgenic mouse lines, the native mouse 5-HT2A receptor is not well-characterized.
Objectives
The goals of the current study were to determine 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor densities in mouse cortex, establish a pharmacological profile of the mouse 5-HT2A receptor, and determine the effects of chronic drug treatment on 5-HT2A receptor density and 5-HT2A receptor-mediated behavior.
Methods
Receptor densities were determined in cortex and frontal cortex via saturation binding assays using [3H]ketanserin or [3H]mesulergine. A pharmacological profile was established by displacing [3H]ketanserin binding with several ligands. Chronic treatment with 5-HT2A/2C receptor agonist, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, MDL 11939, or vehicle was followed by 5-HT2A receptor density determination. Head twitch responses (HTRs) were counted on select days.
Results
Mice had high 5-HT2A, but low 5-HT2C receptor densities. Ligand binding affinities for mouse 5-HT2A receptors correlated with rat, but not rabbit or human, affinities. Chronically DOI-treated mice displayed reduced HTRs and 5-HT2A receptor density compared to saline-treated mice. Receptor density was unchanged following chronic treatment with MDL 11939.
Conclusions
The current study provides some basic information about mouse 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors and provides comparisons to rats, rabbits, and humans. The current chronic agonist treatment study demonstrated an important similarity between the 5-HT2A receptor in mice, rats, and rabbits, while antagonist treatment revealed an interesting difference from previous studies in rabbits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Serotonin (5-HT) 2A receptors are distributed throughout the brain in mammals, with highest receptor densities found in the cortex and frontal cortex (López-Giménez et al. 2002; Pazos et al. 1985, 1987; Pompeiano et al. 1994). The 5-HT2A receptor is involved in hallucinogenic activity (Aghajanian and Marek 1999; González-Maeso et al. 2007) and plays a role in learning and memory (Harvey 2003). Additionally, the 5-HT2A receptor is implicated in numerous psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia (Aloyo et al. 2009; Richtand et al. 2008), depression (Berg et al. 2008; Marek et al. 2003; Michelsen et al. 2008), obsessive-compulsive disorder (El Mansari and Blier 2006; Marek et al. 2003; Steeves and Fox 2008), and autism (Marek et al. 2003). Given the potential as a therapeutic target, 5-HT2A receptors have been studied in several species. In the mouse, however, receptor density of the 5-HT2A—and the closely related 5-HT2C—receptor, ligand binding affinities for the 5-HT2A receptor, and biochemical and behavioral effects of chronic treatment with 5-HT2A receptor agonists and antagonists are poorly characterized.
Among the few studies of 5-HT2A and/or 5-HT2C receptor densities in the mouse brain, reported B max values vary considerably across laboratories, ranging from approximately 20–400 fmol/mg protein in frontal cortex (Canal et al. 2010; Goodwin et al. 1984; Hayslett and Tizabi 2005; Heal et al. 1985; Rioux et al. 1999). In the aforementioned studies, when the 5-HT2C receptor density was determined, it was not measured in the same region as the 5-HT2A receptor. Thus, the current study began with determinations of 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor densities in mouse cortex and frontal cortex.
The 5-HT2A receptor sequence is highly conserved between species; the mouse 5-HT2A receptor shares 97%, 89%, and 91% sequence identity with rat, rabbit, and human 5-HT2A receptors, respectively (The Uniprot Consortium; Ensembl). Although 5-HT2A receptor sequences are similar between many species, binding affinity studies found several ligands that bind differently to rat 5-HT2A receptors compared to rabbits, pigs, monkeys, and humans (Aloyo and Harvey 2000; Johnson et al. 1994; Nelson et al. 1993). Moreover, several groups reported that mutations of a single amino acid in the 5-HT2A receptor sequence can dramatically change its pharmacological profile (Kao et al. 1992; Johnson et al. 1994, 1997; Braden and Nichols 2007). Therefore, a pharmacological profile for the mouse 5-HT2A receptor was developed in the current study. Several common and species-differentiating 5-HT2A receptor ligands were used for this purpose, including ketanserin, mesulergine, MDL 11939, spiperone, LY 53857, ergonovine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI).
Few studies of chronic treatment with 5-HT2A receptor antagonists or agonists have been performed using mice and it is not clear whether mouse 5-HT2A receptors respond similarly to rats and/or rabbits following chronic treatment with 5-HT2A receptor agonists and antagonists. Thus, mice in the current study were chronically treated with the 5-HT2A/2C receptor agonist, DOI, 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, MDL 11939, or vehicle and cortical 5-HT2A receptor density was determined following chronic drug treatment. In addition, head twitch responses (HTRs) were quantified on select days during treatment. The mouse head twitch response is a distinct, rapid, rotational movement of the head around the rostral–caudal axis. Similar to rat head shakes and rabbit head bobs, mouse HTRs are mediated by the 5-HT2A receptor (Dursun and Handley 1996; González-Maeso et al. 2003; Rinaldi-Carmona et al. 1993a), with some modulatory influence exerted by 5-HT2C receptors (Canal et al. 2010). Changes in the number of head movement behaviors elicited by 5-HT2A receptor agonists correlate with changes in cortical 5-HT2A receptor density in mice, rats, and rabbits following repeated drug administration (Blackshear and Sanders-Bush 1982; Dave et al. 2007; Goodwin et al. 1984; Heal et al. 1985; Metz and Heal 1986; Rinaldi-Carmona et al. 1993a, b). Measurement of HTRs on select days of an experiment functions as a simple, non-invasive, behavioral indicator of 5-HT2A receptor activation and cortical receptor density.
Methods
Animals
Adult male C57BL/6N mice (20–30 g) were purchased from Harlan Labs and housed in groups of two to six per cage with free access to food and water. Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (300–350 g) were housed individually with free access to food and water. Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation rapidly followed by decapitation. Rats were sacrificed by decapitation. Whole cerebral cortices or frontal cortices were removed, frozen on dry ice, and stored at −75°C until assayed. These studies were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide “Principles of laboratory animal care” (NIH publication No. 85–23, revised 1985) and with our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval.
Dissection
Dissection of whole and frontal cortex was performed over ice. First, the corpus callosum was severed and the left and right hemispheres were separated. For whole cortex, the hippocampus was then removed and cortex was dissected using microdissection forceps. Care was taken to ensure that no striatal or other subcortical tissue was included. Frontal cortex was defined as the region of cortex that is anterior to the anterior portion of the lateral ventricles and striatum.
Chemicals and reagents
[3H]Ketanserin (67 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Perkin Elmer (Waltham, MA, USA). [3H]Mesulergine (78 or 88 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Amersham/GE Life Sciences (Piscataway, NJ, USA) or American Radiolabeled Chemicals (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ergonovine maleate, DOI hydrochloride, LSD, LY 53857, prazosin hydrochloride, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and bovine serum albumin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich/RBI (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ketanserin hydrochloride, α-Phenyl-1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinemethanol (MDL 11939), spiperone hydrochloride, and 8-[5-(2,4-Dimethoxy-5-(4-trifluoromethylphenylsulphonamido)phenyl-5-oxopentyl]-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione hydrochloride (RS 102221) were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Ellisville, MO, USA). Bio-Rad protein assay dye reagent concentrate was purchased from Bio-Rad (Philadelphia, PA, USA).
Tissue preparation
On the day of the experiments, whole cortices from individual mice, pooled frontal cortices from two to three mice, or frontal cortices from individual rats were homogenized and prepared using methods described previously (Aloyo and Harvey 2000) prior to use in saturation binding or cold displacement assays. To summarize, tissue was homogenized in 50 mM Tris HCl buffer (1:10, w/v, pH 7.4, 4°C) and centrifuged. The supernatant was discarded, pellet resuspended in 50 mM Tris HCl buffer (1:50, w/v, pH 7.4, 4°C) and centrifuged. The second homogenization–centrifugation step was repeated. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was resuspended (to a concentration of 8 mg tissue/ml tris) in 20 mM Tris HCl buffer (pH 7.4, 25°C) and homogenized. The tissue homogenate was then used in assays. Samples of tissue homogenate from each experiment were saved and stored at −75°C to later assay protein content.
5-HT2A receptor analysis
Binding assays were performed at 25°C in 20 mM Tris HCl buffer (pH 7.4) and used 4 mg of cortical (or frontal cortical) homogenate per tube. [3H]Ketanserin was used to analyze 5-HT2A receptors. RS 102221 (30 nM, final concentration) and prazosin (30 nM, final concentration) were used to block [3H]ketanserin binding to 5-HT2C receptors and α1 adrenergic receptors, respectively. Saturation binding studies were performed using six to eight concentrations of [3H]ketanserin (0.04–4.3 nM, final concentration) in a 1 ml assay (final volume). A single concentration of [3H]ketanserin (0.39–0.47 nM, final concentration) was used for cold displacement studies, which were performed in the presence of 5 mM Mg2+, prazosin (30 nM, final concentration), and RS 102221 (30 nM, final concentration), and used six to 12 concentrations of unlabelled drug. Nonspecific binding was determined via addition of spiperone (100 nM, final concentration). Specific [3H]ketanserin binding in buffer was used as a control for maximal binding in cold displacement experiments. Tubes from [3H]ketanserin binding experiments were incubated for 2 h in a 25°C water bath, then rapidly filtered through Whatman GF/B filters (presoaked in 0.5% polyethylenimine) and washed three times with 3 ml of 20 mM Tris HCl buffer (pH 7.4, 4°C). Radioactivity on the filters was determined by liquid scintillation counting. In addition to mouse experiments, [3H]ketanserin was used to determine the binding affinity of MDL 11939 at rat 5-HT2A receptors. Cold displacement of a single concentration of [3H]ketanserin (0.22–0.54 nM, final concentration) was performed using 11 concentrations of MDL 11939 and the same methods as described above for the mouse.
5-HT2C receptor analysis
All binding assays were performed at 25°C in 20 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.4) and used 4 mg of mouse cortical (or frontal cortical) homogenate per tube. [3H]Mesulergine was used to analyze 5-HT2C receptors. Spiperone (30 nM, final concentration) was used to block [3H]mesulergine binding to 5-HT2A receptors. Saturation binding studies were performed using six to eight concentrations of [3H]mesulergine (0.06–4.1 nM, final concentration) in a 1 ml assay (final volume). Tubes from these experiments were incubated for 2 h in a 25°C water bath, then rapidly filtered through Whatman GF/B filters (presoaked in 0.5% polyethylenimine) and washed three times with 3 ml of 20 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.4, 4°C). Radioactivity on the filters was determined by liquid scintillation counting.
Protein assay
Protein content of tissue homogenate samples was determined using the microassay procedure of the Bio-Rad Protein Assay, based on the method described by Bradford (1976). Protein-free “blank” tubes and tubes containing protein standards (ranging 2.5–20 μg/ml protein) were assayed in duplicate and average absorbance was plotted with final protein concentration. A linear regression was produced using the protein standard graph. Thawed tissue homogenate aliquots were assayed in triplicate and protein concentration in each sample was determined using the average absorbance of a sample and the equation for the protein standard regression.
Drug preparation
All drugs were prepared fresh each day for injection. DOI was dissolved in sterile saline and MDL 11939 was dissolved in glacial acetic acid and brought to pH 6.5 with NaOH. Drug solutions were prepared at concentrations necessary to inject 5 μl of solution per gram of mouse.
MDL 11939 pretreatment and acute DOI administration
Mice were injected (i.p.) with 2.95 mg/kg MDL 11939 or vehicle and returned to their home cages. Thirty minutes after pretreatment, 1 mg/kg DOI or saline was injected (i.p.) and behavior was recorded as described below.
Chronic administration of DOI
Mice were injected (i.p.) once daily with 1 mg/kg DOI or saline for 8 days. Twenty-four hours after the eighth injection, all mice were challenged with 0.75 mg/kg DOI, their behavior recorded as described below, and were sacrificed. The dose used for chronic DOI treatment was chosen based on a dose shown to alter frontocortical 5-HT2A receptor density in rats and rabbits following chronic treatment (Aloyo et al. 2001; Anji et al. 2000; Hensler and Truett 1998; McKenna and Peroutka 1989; Smith et al. 1999). The dose used for DOI challenge was chosen based on a dose shown to elicit a significant, but submaximal, increase in HTRs (Weiss et al. 2003) to avoid a ceiling effect.
Chronic administration of MDL 11939
Mice were injected (i.p.) once daily with 2.95 mg/kg MDL 11939 or vehicle for 4 or 8 days. Twenty-four hours after the final treatment, all mice were challenged with 0.75 mg/kg DOI. Mouse behavior was recorded as described below, and the mice were sacrificed. The dose of MDL 11939 used was chosen based on a dose previously shown to alter frontocortical 5-HT2A receptor density in rabbits following chronic treatment (Dave et al. 2007).
Behavior
On select days, individual mice were placed in an empty, transparent, plastic 7.5″ × 11.75″ cage (Allentown Caging, Inc., Allentown, NJ, USA) for 20 min immediately following injection and their behavior was recorded using a JVC Everio (GZ-MG21u) camcorder. Mice treated with MDL 11939 or vehicle for 4 days had behavior recorded on days 1 and 4. Mice treated with MDL 11939, DOI, or vehicle for 8 days had behavior recorded on days 1, 2, 4, and 8. Mice challenged with DOI 24 h after treatment also had their behavior recorded. Mice pretreated with MDL 11939 or vehicle prior to acute DOI or vehicle administration were recorded for 20 min following DOI or vehicle administration. Videos were watched by at least one blinded observer and HTRs that were not contiguous with other behaviors were counted.
Literature survey
Values for 5-HT2A/2C receptor density in rabbit, rat, and human frontal cortices were obtained from the literature. K i or IC50 values for ketanserin, mesulergine, MDL 11939, spiperone, LY 53857, ergonovine, DOI, and LSD were obtained from the literature; IC50 values were converted to K i using the Cheng-Prusoff (1973) equation.
Data analysis
Binding data were analyzed using EBDA/LIGAND (McPherson 1985), a nonlinear curve-fitting program. K d, B max, and K i values were determined from [3H]ketanserin or [3H]mesulergine saturation binding assays and displacement of [3H]ketanserin by unlabelled ligands. Statistical analysis was performed using Systat 7.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Two-sample t tests were performed to identify differences between means of B max, K d, and K i values from receptor analysis and chronic drug administration experiments. Two-sample t tests were also performed to identify differences between mean HTRs of treatment groups upon DOI challenge. A mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine if there was a significant (p < 0.05) main effect or interaction of treatment and days of treatment on HTRs during chronic drug administration experiments. When a significant interaction of treatment and days of treatment were found, univariate F tests were performed to determine on which days there was a significant difference between treatment groups. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the HTRs from MDL 11939- or vehicle-pretreated, DOI- or saline-treated mice. A significant effect was followed up by a pairwise comparison with a Bonferroni adjustment. Pearson product moment correlation was used to determine correlation between mouse and other species binding affinity values. Data from the current study are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval (CI) unless otherwise noted.
Results
Serotonin 2A receptor density in mouse cortex and frontal cortex
Serotonin 2A receptor densities in mouse cortex and frontal cortex were determined via saturation binding of [3H]ketanserin. Scatchard analysis of binding results showed that [3H]ketanserin bound to a single class of binding sites in mouse cortex and frontal cortex (Fig. 1). In whole cortex, mean B max and K i values for [3H]ketanserin (5-HT2A receptor) binding from 16 separate assays were 114.4 fmol/mg protein (95% CI, 91.3–137.4) and 0.53 nM (95% CI, 0.49–0.56), respectively. In pooled frontal cortex, mean B max and K i values for [3H]ketanserin binding from 13 separate assays were 143.1 fmol/mg protein (95% CI, 107.6–178.7) and 0.48 nM (95% CI, 0.43–0.53), respectively (Table 1). No significant difference was found between whole cortex and frontal cortex B max or K i values (t test; p = 0.141 and p = 0.093, respectively).
Serotonin 2C receptor density in mouse cortex and frontal cortex
Serotonin 2C receptor densities in mouse cortex and frontal cortex were determined via saturation binding of [3H]mesulergine. Scatchard analysis of binding results showed that [3H]mesulergine bound to a single class of binding sites in mouse cortex and frontal cortex (Fig. 1). In whole cortex, mean B max and K i values for [3H]mesulergine (5-HT2C receptor) binding from three separate assays were 8.51 fmol/mg protein (95% CI, −5.6–22.6) and 0.44 nM (95% CI, 0.09–0.79), respectively. In pooled frontal cortex, mean B max and K i values for [3H]mesulergine from three separate assays were 13.4 fmol/mg protein (95% CI, 0.2–26.5) and 0.61 nM (95% CI, −0.15–1.37), respectively (Table 1). No significant difference was found between whole cortex and frontal cortex B max or K i values (t test; p = 0.341 and p = 0.425, respectively).
Serotonin 2A receptor ligand binding affinities in mouse
Binding affinities of several commonly-used and species-differentiating 5-HT2A receptor antagonists (mesulergine, MDL 11939, spiperone, LY 53857) and agonists (ergonovine, DOI, LSD) of the 5-HT2A were determined via dose-dependent displacement of [3H]ketanserin in mouse cortex. Nonlinear curve fitting analyses of three to four separate assays revealed that seven of the eight 5-HT2A receptor ligands examined inhibited [3H]ketanserin binding at a single class of sites. The eighth ligand, DOI, inhibited [3H]ketanserin binding at two classes of sites. Most K i values obtained, ranging from 0.4 nM for spiperone to 6.52 nM for the high affinity DOI binding site, indicate that these ligands bind with high affinity for the 5-HT2A receptor (Table 2). Ergonovine and the low affinity DOI binding site were exceptions to these findings, with K i values of 22.1 and 92.8 nM, respectively.
MDL 11939 pretreatment blocks DOI-elicited HTRs
Mice were pretreated with vehicle or 2.95 mg/kg MDL 11939 30 min prior to administration of saline or 1 mg/kg DOI to confirm that a 2.95 mg/kg MDL 11939 dose is behaviorally active and capable of blocking DOI-elicited HTRs. One-way analysis of variance revealed a significant main effect of treatment (F 3,20 = 43.59, p < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons with a Bonferroni adjustment revealed that vehicle-pretreated, DOI-treated mice exhibited significantly more head twitches than either saline-treated group (p < 0.001) or the MDL 11939-pretreated, DOI-treated group (p < 0.001). No other significant differences between groups were found.
DOI HTRs and 5-HT2A receptor binding
A significant interaction between treatment and days of treatment were found via mixed ANOVA (F 3,57 = 9.65, p < 0.001). The simple main effect of treatment on days of treatment was determined via post hoc univariate F tests, which revealed that DOI-treated mice exhibited significantly more HTRs than vehicle-treated mice on all days of behavioral observation (p < 0.001; F 1,19 = 58.63, F 1,19 = 107.1, F 1,19 = 49.47, and F 1,19 = 177.0 for days 1, 2, 4, and 8, respectively; Fig. 2a). However, mice showed tolerance to the behavioral effects of DOI, beginning 24 h after the first dose and persisting for the duration of the experiment. DOI-treated mice exhibited significantly fewer HTRs than vehicle-treated mice when challenged with 0.75 mg/kg DOI 24 h after their final 1 mg/kg DOI or vehicle injection (t test; p < 0.001). Consistent with behavioral observations, cortical 5-HT2A receptor density in DOI-treated mice was significantly decreased compared to vehicle-treated mice after chronic treatment (t test; p = 0.043; Fig. 2b; Table 3).
MDL 11939 HTRs and 5-HT2A receptor binding
MDL 11939-treated mice exhibited fewer HTRs than vehicle-treated mice on all days observed (days 1, 2, 4, and 8 of 8-day treatment; Fig. 3a; days 1 and 4 of 4-day treatment; data not shown). Additionally, a mixed ANOVA of HTRs during 8-day treatment revealed significant main effects of treatment (F 1,11 = 37.42, p < 0.001) and days of treatment (F 3,33 = 3.23, p = 0.035), but no significant interaction (F 3,33 = 1.99, p = 0.134). Analysis of HTRs during the 4-day experiment revealed a significant interaction between treatment and day of treatment (F 1,10 = 5.49, p = 0.041). The simple main effect of treatment on days of treatment was determined via post hoc univariate F tests, which revealed that MDL 11939-treated mice exhibited significantly fewer HTRs than vehicle-treated mice on all days of behavioral observation (p < 0.01; F 1,10 = 14.71 and F 1,10 = 16.89 for days 1 and 4, respectively). When challenged with 0.75 mg/kg DOI 24 h after their final MDL 11939 or vehicle injection, however, no difference in HTRs was found between treatment groups (t test; p = 0.188 and p = 0.923 for 8- and 4-day treatments, respectively). Consistent with behavioral observations, cortical 5-HT2A receptor density in MDL 11939-treated mice was not significantly different from vehicle-treated mice (t test; p = 0.577 and p = 0.923 for 8- and 4-day treatments, respectively; Fig. 3b). Binding data from chronic DOI and MDL 11939 treatments is summarized in Table 3.
Comparisons with other species
Receptor density data for 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors from rats, rabbits, and humans were compiled for comparison with mice (Table 4). Table 5 compares ligand-binding affinities at the mouse 5-HT2A receptor with literature values for rats, rabbits, and humans. No K i value for MDL 11939 in rat frontal cortex is present in the literature and was therefore determined. Binding affinity data are represented graphically in Fig. 4 (excluding low affinity DOI K i values). Studies of rats treated chronically with DOI and rabbits treated chronically with DOI or MDL 11939 have been published. Table 6 summarizes the effects of chronic DOI or MDL 11939 treatments on 5-HT2A receptor density in mice, rats, and rabbits. In all three species, animals treated chronically with DOI had decreased 5-HT2A receptors in the cortex or frontal cortex. Unlike that obtained in rabbits, mouse cortical 5-HT2A receptor density did not change following 4 or 8 days of 2.95 mg/kg MDL 11939 treatments. No studies in which rats were treated with MDL 11939 and 5-HT2A receptor density was examined could be found in the literature.
Discussion
The current study was designed to provide a more complete pharmacological profile of the mouse 5-HT2A receptor than is presently available. Additionally, the relationship between 5-HT2A and the closely related 5-HT2C receptor densities in cortex and frontal cortex was examined. Whole mouse cortex and frontal cortex both exhibited high levels of 5-HT2A receptors. These results suggest a widespread distribution of 5-HT2A receptors throughout all regions of mouse cortex. Consistent with saturation binding results of the current study, autoradiography in mouse brain revealed high levels of 5-HT2A/2C agonist, [125I]DOI, and selective 5-HT2A antagonist, [3H]MDL 100907, binding throughout the cortex of 129S6/SvEv (González-Maeso et al. 2007) and C57BL/6J mice (López-Giménez et al. 2002), respectively. In addition to similarities to autoradiography results, the number of DOI-elicited HTRs in C57BL/6N mice in the current study is similar to previous reports using C57BL/6J mice (Weiss et al. 2003). Thus, it is unlikely that the receptor densities currently determined using C57BL/6N mice are markedly different from other mouse strains.
Unlike the mouse 5-HT2A receptor, 5-HT2C receptor density was very low in both mouse cortex and frontal cortex. Mouse 5-HT2C receptor density was observed to be quite different compared to rats, rabbits, and humans (Table 4). In both regions, mouse 5-HT2C receptors account for less than 10% of the combined 5-HT2A/2C receptor density. In contrast, 5-HT2C receptors account for 15.8%, 29.1%, and 34.1% of the combined 5-HT2A/2C receptor densities in rat, rabbit, and human cortex, respectively. Future studies will be needed to confirm the current results and elucidate any behavioral or biochemical differences in species with higher or lower cortical 5-HT2C receptor densities.
The current study established mouse 5-HT2A receptor binding affinities of several common 5-HT2A receptor ligands and allowed a preliminary interspecies comparison of ligand binding at the 5-HT2A receptor. Interestingly, the mouse 5-HT2A receptor binding affinities obtained were significantly correlated with affinities of the rat but not the human or rabbit receptors. The correlation between mouse and rat ligand affinities is consistent with an early characterization of the 5-HT2A receptor performed by Peroutka et al. (1981). Peroutka et al. found a strong correlation between drug potencies to inhibit HTRs in mice and inhibit [3H]spiroperidol binding in rat cortex. Differences in ligand binding affinities between mouse and rabbit or human receptors are probably attributable to species differences in 5-HT2A receptor sequences, as single amino acid changes in the 5-HT2A receptor sequence are capable of causing dramatic changes to its ligand binding profile (Braden and Nichols 2007; Johnson et al. 1994, 1997; Kao et al. 1992).
Consistent with previous reports, acute treatment with DOI in the present study elicited significantly more HTRs compared to vehicle treatment (Darmani et al. 1990; Dursun and Handley 1996; Fox et al. 2009; Rinaldi-Carmona et al. 1993a; Weiss et al. 2003). Mice treated once daily with DOI for 8 days, however, rapidly developed tolerance to the behavioral effects. DOI-elicited HTRs were reduced by 33% on the second day of treatment. This tolerance to DOI-elicited HTRs was similar to that observed by Darmani et al. (1990), who chronically treated male ICR mice with 2.5 mg/kg DOI. Tolerance to the behavioral effects of DOI was maintained throughout the 8 days in the current experiments. Furthermore, mice treated with 1 mg/kg DOI for 8 days exhibited tolerance to a smaller dose of DOI (0.75 mg/kg) administered on the ninth day. These results are in marked contrast to the results obtained by Darmani et al. (1990). They observed tolerance to DOI-elicited HTRs through the fifth day of chronic DOI treatment; HTRs counted on days six and eight were not significantly different from HTRs on day 1 (Darmani et al. 1990). Future studies are necessary to determine if differences in mouse strains and DOI doses used account for these inconsistencies.
The current study is the first to determine that cortical 5-HT2A receptor density in mice is significantly decreased following chronic administration of DOI. Mice, similar to rats and rabbits, displayed decreased 5-HT2A receptor density (Table 6). Thus, chronic administration of DOI decreases both 5-HT2A receptor density and DOI-elicited HTRs. The positive correlation between drug-induced head twitch behavior and cortical receptor density observed in this study is consistent with other studies in mice (Table 7). Similar correlations between 5-HT2A-mediated head movements and 5-HT2A receptor density have also been demonstrated in rats and rabbits (Aloyo et al. 2001; Dave et al. 2007; Leysen et al. 1989; Leysen and Pauwels 1990). These results suggest that certain head movement behaviors, such as mouse head twitches, might be used as behavioral indicators of changes in cortical 5-HT2A receptor density.
In the present study, acute administration of the selective 5-HT2A antagonist, MDL 11939, reduced spontaneous and DOI-elicited head twitches. Dursun and Handley (1996) also reported that spontaneous and DOI-elicited HTRs can be blocked with 5-HT2A receptor antagonists. These results support the conclusion that activation of 5-HT2A receptors mediates head twitches, whether spontaneous or DOI-induced. Similar to acute treatment, chronic treatment with MDL 11939 reduced spontaneous HTRs in mice on all days observed. Mice chronically treated with MDL 11939, however, did not differ from vehicle-treated mice in either DOI-elicited HTRs or 5-HT2A receptor densities. A greater dose may be necessary to see a change in receptor density in mice, but pilot studies using higher doses of MDL 11939 revealed dose-dependent sedative-like effects and a dramatic reduction in most behaviors (data not shown), therefore making treatment with a larger dose of MDL 11939 unsuitable for the current study.
Numerous studies, primarily using rats, have demonstrated that a “paradoxical” downregulation in response to chronic treatment with 5-HT2A receptor antagonists (for reviews see Gray and Roth 2001; van Oekelen et al. 2003). However, two antagonists have resulted in the up-regulation of 5-HT2A receptors. Chronic administration of SR 46349B, for example, up-regulates 5-HT2A receptor density in rats, mice, and rabbits (Rinaldi-Carmona et al. 1993a,b; Scarlota et al. unpublished). Similarly, repeated administration of MDL 11939 to rabbits leads to an increase in 5-HT2A receptor density (Dave et al. 2007). Surprisingly, in the current study, repeated administration of a behaviorally active dose of MDL 11939 neither up- nor downregulated 5-HT2A receptor density. This lack of effect suggests that the mechanisms regulating 5-HT2A receptor density may be different in different species and that “paradoxical” regulation may not be a universal property of 5-HT2A receptors. Based on the current results, future investigations using a variety of 5-HT2A receptor ligands in mice and other species are warranted.
Interestingly, the same dose and durations of MDL 11939 treatment that had no effect on mouse cortical 5-HT2A receptor density increased rabbit cortical 5-HT2A receptor density (Dave et al. 2007). This finding highlights the difficulty of predicting antagonist effects on 5-HT2A receptor regulation; downregulation of 5-HT2A receptors after chronic antagonist treatment is variable between ligands or, at least in the current study, species. At the time of this writing, no studies using rats for a similar experiment have been published. A study using rats could help determine if the lack of change after 4 or 8 days of MDL 11939 treatment was common among rodents or limited to mice. Although further study is necessary, the difference between the current results using mice and previous studies in rabbits suggests the presence of interspecies differences in 5-HT2A receptor regulation by certain compounds.
Mice, like humans, have high cortical 5-HT2A receptor density and are therefore useful for studying cortical 5-HT2A receptor regulation and function. However, in contrast to humans, rats, and rabbits, mouse cortical 5-HT2C receptor density was very low, especially relative to 5-HT2A receptor density. Assuming 5-HT2C receptors are pharmacologically and biochemically similar across species, their low density in mice relative to 5-HT2A receptors could result in preferential binding at cortical 5-HT2A receptors over 5-HT2C receptors. Additionally, differences in cortical 5-HT2A to 5-HT2C receptor density ratios combined with differences in ligand binding affinities at 5-HT2A receptors may limit cross-species translation of 5-HT2A/2C receptor ligand effects in cortex. Despite these differences, 5-HT2A receptor density decreased similarly in mouse, rat, and rabbit following chronic treatment with DOI. Chronic treatment with MDL 11939, however, revealed a differential effect on 5-HT2A receptor density in mice and in rabbits. The current study presents a more complete picture of the mouse 5-HT2A receptor than previously existed. Future studies can establish additional similarities and differences between mouse and rat, rabbit, and human 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors, and should help to further refine the appropriate use of mice to elucidate the role of 5-HT2A receptors in learning, memory, and psychiatric disorders.
References
Aghajanian GK, Marek GJ (1999) Serotonin and hallucinogens. Neuropsychopharmacology 21(2 Suppl):16S–23S
Aloyo VJ, Harvey JA (2000) Antagonist binding at 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors in the rabbit: high correlation with the profile for the human receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 406(2):163–169
Aloyo VJ, Dave KD, Rahman T, Harvey JA (2001) Selective and divergent regulation of cortical 5-HT(2A) receptors in rabbit. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 299(3):1066–1072
Aloyo VJ, Berg KA, Spampinato U, Clarke WP, Harvey JA (2009) Current status of inverse agonism at serotonin2A (5-HT2A) and 5-HT2C receptors. Pharmacol Ther 121(2):160–173
Anji A, Kumari M, Sullivan Hanley NR, Bryan GL, Hensler JG (2000) Regulation of 5-HT(2A) receptor mRNA levels and binding sites in rat frontal cortex by the agonist DOI and the antagonist mianserin. Neuropharmacology 39(11):1996–2005
Battaglia G, Shannon M, Borgundvaag B, Titeler M (1983) pH-dependent modulation of agonist interactions with [3H]-ketanserin-labelled S2 serotonin receptors. Life Sci 33(20):2011–2016
Battaglia G, Shannon M, Titeler M (1984) Guanyl nucleotide and divalent cation regulation of cortical S2 serotonin receptors. J Neurochem 43(5):1213–1219
Berg KA, Harvey JA, Spampinato U, Clarke WP (2008) Physiological and therapeutic relevance of constitutive activity of 5-HT 2A and 5-HT 2C receptors for the treatment of depression. Prog Brain Res 172:287–305
Blackshear MA, Sanders-Bush E (1982) Serotonin receptor sensitivity after acute and chronic treatment with mianserin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 221(2):303–308
Bonhaus DW, Bach C, DeSouza A, Salazar FH, Matsuoka BD, Zuppan P, Chan HW, Eglen RM (1995) The pharmacology and distribution of human 5-hydroxytryptamine2B (5-HT2B) receptor gene products: comparison with 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors. Br J Pharmacol 115(4):622–628
Braden MR, Nichols DE (2007) Assessment of the roles of serines 5.43(239) and 5.46(242) for binding and potency of agonist ligands at the human serotonin 5-HT2A receptor. Mol Pharmacol 72(5):1200–1209
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254
Canal CE, Olaghere da Silva UB, Gresch PJ, Watt EE, Sanders-Bush E, Airey DC (2010) The serotonin 2C receptor potently modulates the head-twitch response in mice induced by a phenethylamine hallucinogen. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 209(2):163–174
Chaouloff F, Baudrie V, Coupry I (1993) Behavioural and biochemical evidence that glucocorticoids are not involved in DOI-elicited 5-HT2 receptor down-regulation. Eur J Pharmacol 249(1):117–120
Chaouloff F, Kulikov A, Mormède P (1997) Repeated DOI and SR 46349B treatments do not affect elevated plus-maze anxiety despite opposite effects on cortical 5-HT2A receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 334(1):25–29
Cheng Y, Prusoff WH (1973) Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol 22(23):3099–3108
Darmani NA, Martin BR, Glennon RA (1990) Withdrawal from chronic treatment with (+/−)-DOI causes super-sensitivity to 5-HT2 receptor-induced head-twitch behaviour in mice. Eur J Pharmacol 186(1):115–118
Dave KD, Harvey JA, Aloyo VJ (2007) The time-course for up- and down-regulation of the cortical 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A receptor density predicts 5-HT2A receptor-mediated behavior in the rabbit. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 323(1):327–335
Dursun SM, Handley SL (1996) Similarities in the pharmacology of spontaneous and DOI-induced head-shakes suggest 5HT2A receptors are active under physiological conditions. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 128(2):198–205
El Mansari M, Blier P (2006) Mechanisms of action of current and potential pharmacotherapies of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 30(3):362–373
Fone KC, Austin RH, Topham IA, Kennett GA, Punhani T (1998) Effect of chronic m-CPP on locomotion, hypophagia, plasma corticosterone and 5-HT2C receptor levels in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 123(8):1707–1715
Fox MA, French HT, Laporte JL, Blackler AR, Murphy DL (2010) The serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor agonist TCB-2: a behavioral and neurophysiological analysis. Psychopharmacology 212(1):13–23
González-Maeso J, Yuen T, Ebersole BJ, Wurmbach E, Lira A, Zhou M, Weisstaub N, Hen R, Gingrich JA, Sealfon SC (2003) Transcriptome fingerprints distinguish hallucinogenic and nonhallucinogenic 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor agonist effects in mouse somatosensory cortex. J Neurosci 23(26):8836–8843
González-Maeso J, Weisstaub NV, Zhou M, Chan P, Ivic L, Ang R, Lira A, Bradley-Moore M, Ge Y, Zhou Q, Sealfon SC, Gingrich JA (2007) Hallucinogens recruit specific cortical 5-HT(2A) receptor-mediated signaling pathways to affect behavior. Neuron 53(3):439–452
Goodwin GM, Green AR, Johnson P (1984) 5-HT2 receptor characteristics in frontal cortex and 5-HT2 receptor-mediated head-twitch behaviour following antidepressant treatment to mice. Br J Pharmacol 83(1):235–242
Gray JA, Roth BL (2001) Paradoxical trafficking and regulation of 5-HT(2A) receptors by agonists and antagonists. Brain Res Bull 56(5):441–451
Hagen JD, Pierce PA, Peroutka SJ (1994) Differential binding of ergot compounds to human versus rat 5-HT2 cortical receptors. Biol Signals 3(5):223–229
Harvey JA (2003) Role of the serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor in learning. Learn Mem 10(5):355–362
Hayslett RL, Tizabi Y (2005) Effects of donepezil, nicotine and haloperidol on the central serotonergic system in mice: implications for Tourette’s syndrome. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 81(4):879–886
Heal DJ, Philpot J, Molyneux SG, Metz A (1985) Intracerebroventricular administration of 5, 7-dihydroxytryptamine to mice increases both head-twitch response and the number of cortical 5-HT2 receptors. Neuropharmacology 24(12):1201–1205
Hensler JG, Truett KA (1998) Effect of chronic serotonin-2 receptor agonist or antagonist administration on serotonin-1A receptor sensitivity. Neuropsychopharmacology 19(5):354–364
Hoyer D, Engel G, Kalkman HO (1985) Molecular pharmacology of 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 recognition sites in rat and pig brain membranes: radioligand binding studies with [3H]5-HT, [3H]8-OH-DPAT, (-)[125I]iodocyanopindolol, [3H]mesulergine and [3H]ketanserin. Eur J Pharmacol 118(1–2):13–23
Hoyer D, Pazos A, Probst A, Palacios JM (1986) Serotonin receptors in the human brain. II. Characterization and autoradiographic localization of 5-HT1C and 5-HT2 recognition sites. Brain Res 376(1):97–107
Hulihan-Giblin BA, Park YD, Aulakh CS (1994) Differential effects of chronic antidepressant treatment on 5-HT1C receptor binding sites in Wistar rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol 263(1–2):213–216
Johnson MP, Loncharich RJ, Baez M, Nelson DL (1994) Species variations in transmembrane region V of the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 2A receptor alter the structure–activity relationship of certain ergolines and tryptamines. Mol Pharmacol 45(2):277–286
Johnson MP, Siegel BW, Carr AA (1996) [3H]MDL 100, 907: a novel selective 5-HT2A receptor ligand. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 354(2):205–209
Johnson MP, Wainscott DB, Lucaites VL, Baez M, Nelson DL (1997) Mutations of transmembrane IV and V serines indicate that all tryptamines do not bind to the rat 5-HT2A receptor in the same manner. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 49(1–2):1–6
Kao HT, Adham N, Olsen MA, Weinshank RL, Branchek TA, Hartig PR (1992) Site-directed mutagenesis of a single residue changes the binding properties of the serotonin 5-HT2 receptor from a human to a rat pharmacology. FEBS Lett 307(3):324–328
Leonhardt S, Gorospe E, Hoffman BJ, Teitler M (1992) Molecular pharmacological differences in the interaction of serotonin with 5-hydroxytryptamine1C and 5-hydroxytryptamine2 receptors. Mol Pharmacol 42(2):328–335
Leysen JE, Janssen PF, Niemegeers CJ (1989) Rapid desensitization and down-regulation of 5-HT2 receptors by DOM treatment. Eur J Pharmacol 163(1):145–149
Leysen JE, Niemegeers CJ, Van Nueten JM, Laduron PM (1982) [3H]Ketanserin (R 41 468), a selective 3H-ligand for serotonin2 receptor binding sites. Binding properties, brain distribution, and functional role. Mol Pharmacol 21(2):301–314
Leysen JE, Eens A, Gommeren W, van Gompel P, Wynants J, Janssen PA (1988) Identification of nonserotonergic [3H]ketanserin binding sites associated with nerve terminals in rat brain and with platelets; relation with release of biogenic amine metabolites induced by ketanserin- and tetrabenazine-like drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 244(1):310–321
Leysen JE, Pauwels PJ (1990) 5-HT2 receptors, roles and regulation. Ann NY Acad Sci 600:183–191, discussion 192–193
López-Giménez JF, Vilaró MT, Palacios JM, Mengod G (1998) [3H]MDL 100, 907 labels 5-HT2A serotonin receptors selectively in primate brain. Neuropharmacology 37(9):1147–1158
López-Giménez JF, Tecott LH, Palacios JM, Mengod G, Vilaró MT (2002) Serotonin 5- HT (2C) receptor knockout mice: autoradiographic analysis of multiple serotonin receptors. J Neurosci Res 67(1):69–85
Lyon RA, Davis KH, Titeler M (1987) 3H-DOB (4-bromo-2, 5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine) labels a guanyl nucleotide-sensitive state of cortical 5-HT2 receptors. Mol Pharmacol 31(2):194–199
Marek GJ, Carpenter LL, McDougle CJ, Price LH (2003) Synergistic action of 5-HT2A antagonists and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 28(2):402–412
McKenna DJ, Peroutka SJ (1989) Differentiation of 5-hydroxytryptamine2 receptor subtypes using 125I-R-(−)2, 5-dimethoxy-4-iodo-phenylisopropylamine and 3H-ketanserin. J Neurosci 9(10):3482–3490
McPherson GA (1985) Kinetic, ebda, ligand, lowry: a collection of radioligand binding analysis programmes. Biosoft, Cambridge, MA
Meltzer HY, Matsubara S, Lee JC (1989) Classification of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs on the basis of dopamine D-1, D-2 and serotonin2 pKi values. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 251(1):238–246
Metz A, Heal DJ (1986) In mice repeated administration of electroconvulsive shock or desmethylimipramine produces rapid alterations in 5-HT2-mediated head-twitch responses and cortical 5-HT2 receptor number. Eur J Pharmacol 126(1–2):159–162
Michelsen KA, Prickaerts J, Steinbusch HWM (2008) The dorsal raphe nucleus and serotonin: implications for neuroplasticity linked to major depression and Alzheimer’s disease. Prog Brain Res 172:233–264
Neale RF, Fallon SL, Boyar WC, Wasley JW, Martin LL, Stone GA, Glaeser BS, Sinton CM, Williams M (1987) Biochemical and pharmacological characterization of CGS 12066B, a selective serotonin-1B agonist. Eur J Pharmacol 136(1):1–9
Nelson DL, Lucaites VL, Audia JE, Nissen JS, Wainscott DB (1993) Species differences in the pharmacology of the 5-hydroxytryptamine2 receptor: structurally specific differentiation by ergolines and tryptamines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 265(3):1272–1279
Pazos A, Hoyer D, Palacios JM (1984) Mesulergine, a selective serotonin-2 ligand in the rat cortex, does not label these receptors in porcine and human cortex: evidence for species differences in brain serotonin-2 receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 106(3):531–538
Pazos A, Cortés R, Palacios JM (1985) Quantitative autoradiographic mapping of serotonin receptors in the rat brain. II. Serotonin-2 receptors. Brain Res 346(2):231–249
Pazos A, Probst A, Palacios JM (1987) Serotonin receptors in the human brain–IV. Autoradiographic mapping of serotonin-2 receptors. Neuroscience 21(1):123–139
Peroutka SJ, Lebovitz RM, Snyder SH (1981) Two distinct central serotonin receptors with different physiological functions. Science 212(4496):827–829
Pompeiano M, Palacios JM, Mengod G (1994) Distribution of the serotonin 5-HT2 receptor family mRNAs: comparison between 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 23(1–2):163–178
Pranzatelli MR, Balletti J (1992) Serotonin receptors in human neuroblastoma: a possible biologic tumor marker. Exp Neurol 115(3):423–427
Richtand NM, Welge JA, Logue AD, Keck PE, Strakowski SM, McNamara RK (2008) Role of serotonin and dopamine receptor binding in antipsychotic efficacy. Prog Brain Res 172:155–175
Rinaldi-Carmona M, Congy C, Santucci V, Simiand J, Gautret B, Neliat G, Labeeuw B, Le Fur G, Soubrie P, Breliere JC (1992) Biochemical and pharmacological properties of SR 46349B, a new potent and selective 5-hydroxytryptamine2 receptor antagonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 262(2):759–768
Rinaldi-Carmona M, Congy C, Simiand J, Oury-Donat F, Soubrie P, Breliere JC, Le Fur G (1993a) Repeated administration of SR 46349B, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine2 antagonist, up-regulates 5-hydroxytryptamine2 receptors in mouse brain. Mol Pharmacol 43(1):84–89
Rinaldi-Carmona M, Bouaboula M, Congy C, Oury-Donat F, Simiand J, Shire D, Casellas P, Soubrié P, Brelière JC, Le Fur G (1993b) Up-regulation of 5-HT2 receptors in the rat brain by repeated administration of SR 46349B, a selective 5-HT2 receptor antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol 246(1):73–80
Rioux A, Fabre V, Lesch KP, Moessner R, Murphy DL, Lanfumey L, Hamon M, Martres MP (1999) Adaptive changes of serotonin 5-HT2A receptors in mice lacking the serotonin transporter. Neurosci Lett 262(2):113–116
Roth BL, Ciaranello RD, Meltzer HY (1992) Binding of typical and atypical antipsychotic agents to transiently expressed 5-HT1C receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 260(3):1361–1365
Sadzot B, Baraban JM, Glennon RA, Lyon RA, Leonhardt S, Jan CR, Titeler M (1989) Hallucinogenic drug interactions at human brain 5-HT2 receptors: implications for treating LSD-induced hallucinogenesis. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 98(4):495–499
Schotte A, Maloteaux JM, Laduron PM (1983) Characterization and regional distribution of serotonin S2-receptors in human brain. Brain Res 276(2):231–235
Schreiber R, Brocco M, Audinot V, Gobert A, Veiga S, Millan MJ (1995) (1-(2, 5-dimethoxy-4 iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane)-induced head-twitches in the rat are mediated by 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) 2A receptors: modulation by novel 5-HT2A/2C antagonists, D1 antagonists and 5-HT1A agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 273(1):101–112
Smith RL, Barrett RJ, Sanders-Bush E (1999) Mechanism of tolerance development to 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine in rats: down-regulation of the 5-HT2A, but not 5-HT2C, receptor. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 144(3):248–254
Steeves TDL, Fox SH (2008) Neurobiological basis of serotonin–dopamine antagonists in the treatment of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Prog Brain Res 172:495–513
Van Oekelen D, Luyten WHML, Leysen JE (2003) 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors and their atypical regulation properties. Life Sci 72(22):2429–2449
Wainscott DB, Lucaites VL, Kursar JD, Baez M, Nelson DL (1996) Pharmacologic characterization of the human 5-hydroxytryptamine2B receptor: evidence for species differences. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 276(2):720–727
Weber JT, O’Connor MF, Hayataka K, Colson N, Medora R, Russo EB, Parker KK (1997) Activity of parthenolide at 5HT2A receptors. J Nat Prod 60(6):651–653
Weiss KC, Kim DY, Pawson CT, Cordes SP (2003) A genetic screen for mouse mutations with defects in serotonin responsiveness. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 115(2):162–172
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Dr. James Barrett for reviewing this manuscript, Dr. Anthony Romano for assistance with statistical analysis, Dr. Laura Scarlota for assistance dissecting mouse cortices and frontal cortices, and the two anonymous reviewers of this article, whose comments, suggestions, and criticism helped improve this manuscript considerably.
Funding support provided by the Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Drexel University College of Medicine.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data if desired.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dougherty, J.P., Aloyo, V.J. Pharmacological and behavioral characterization of the 5-HT2A receptor in C57BL/6N mice. Psychopharmacology 215, 581–593 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2207-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2207-6