Abstract
A total of 104 exopolysaccharide (gum)-producing bacteria were isolated from the juice screen and juice tank in a sugarcane processing factory at times of low- and high dextran concentrations in the produced sugar. Dextran is an indicator of cane deterioration and sucrose loss after harvesting of the cane. The isolates were identified as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (96 isolates) and Bacillus subtilis (eight isolates) based on restriction enzyme banding patterns of amplified 16S rRNA genes and rpoB gene sequence analysis. Exopolysaccharide production in sugarcane is normally associated with dextran produced by Leuconostoc mesenteroides. B. amyloliquefaciens, and to a lesser extent B. subtilis, could, however, also be responsible for exopolysaccharide (slime or gum) production in cane processing factories.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The limited knowledge and understanding of spoilage microorganisms in sugarcane processing factories is well documented (Kulkarni 1999; Nel 2014; Solomon 2000). Foxon and du Clou (2017) reported that gum production may occur in the factory and that microbial-related sucrose losses are not limited to the field as sugarcane deteriorates post-harvest. The identification of gum-producing bacteria in sugarcane processing is important for developing strategies to prevent post-harvest deterioration and gum production. In a recent study (Nel et al. 2019), we showed that the majority of gum-producing bacteria entering a South African sugarcane factory were different to those isolated from areas in the factory after extraction of the sucrose from the sugarcane in the diffuser. Although treatment of shredded cane above 85 °C in the diffuser would likely kill most bacteria, some species indigenous to the factory may contaminate different areas of the factory and multiply under favorable growth conditions.
The area behind the juice screens appeared to be the most frequent source of microbial contamination in the sugar factory, adding to the increased bacterial levels found in the mixed juice tank (Nel et al. 2019). In many reports, slimy deposits observed on juice screens have been associated with the growth of Leuconostoc spp. (Lillehoj et al. 1984; Rein 2007).
Although bacterial identification based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing is the foundation of modern taxonomy (Woese 1987), analysis based on pair-wise alignment of 16S rRNA gene sequences has revealed a high similarity amongst strains of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (Wang et al. 2008). Sequencing of housekeeping genes showed improved differentiation between these two species (Blackwood et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2007). The gene encoding the beta subunit of DNA-directed RNA polymerase in Bacillus spp. (rpoB) is highly conserved (Mollet et al. 1997), has a single copy in the genome, and is approximately 3.5 kb in length (Ki et al. 2009). Restriction enzyme analyses of genes encoding 16S rRNA (amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis; ARDRA) have been used to differentiate B. amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus pumilis and B. subtilis (Jeyaram et al. 2011; Wu et al. 2006).
In the present study, 104 exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria isolated from a South African sugarcane processing factory were identified to species level by ARDRA, using restriction enzymes RsaI, HhaI and HinfI, and their identities confirmed with rpoB gene sequencing.
Materials and methods
Sampling and isolation of bacteria
Isolation, screening and culturing of the isolates were as described by Nel et al. (2019). A total of 104 exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria were isolated from the juice screen and mixed juice (MJ) tank in a South African sugarcane processing factory when low (< 70 ppm) and high (> 500 ppm) concentrations of dextran in the produced sugar were reported by the South African Sugar Terminals (SAST). Dextran concentrations in the raw sugar were determined by SAST using a modified alcohol haze method (Anon 2015). The method quantifies gums, defined as polysaccharides of high molecular weight precipitated from aqueous solutions in the presence of acidified ethanol (Imrie and Tilbury 1972), against dextran standards. In sugarcane processing streams, these gums may include a collection of polysaccharides, including structural plant polysaccharides, hemicelluloses and starch, as well as polysaccharides from bacterial metabolism such as dextran and levan.
Amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA)
Genomic DNA of the gum-producing bacteria was isolated as previously described (Nel et al. 2019). The ARDRA method developed by Jeyaram et al. (2011) was used. Genomic DNA (100 ng) was suspended in 50-μl reaction mixture that contained 10 pmol of each primer, 200 µM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (Thermo Scientific), 10 µl of 5 × One Taq Standard Reaction buffer and 1.25 U of One Taq Hot Start DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific). The primers used to amplify the 16S rRNA gene were fD1 (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and rD1 (5′-AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA-3′) (Weisburg et al. 1991). The PCR reaction was performed in a programmable thermal cycler (MultiGene OptiMax, Labnet International, Whitehead Scientific, Cape Town, South Africa) with an initial denaturation step (94 °C, 30 s), followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 30 s), primer annealing (65 °C, 30 s) and elongation (68 °C, 90 s). Cycling was completed by a final elongation step (68 °C, 10 min), followed by cooling to 4 °C. Restriction analysis of the amplified 16S rRNA genes was performed using FastDigest RsaI, CfoI (HhaI) and HinfI enzymes (Thermo Scientific). Restriction digestion was carried out in 15-μl reaction mixtures containing 1.5 μl of FastDigest Green Buffer, 10-μl template DNA, 3-μl sterile deionised water and 0.5 μl of each restriction enzyme, respectively, and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. Restriction fragments were separated on a 2% (w/v) agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and the DNA fragments visualized under UV light.
PCR amplification, partial sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the rpoB genes
A fragment of the rpoB gene (positions 6–585) was amplified by PCR using primers rpoB-f (5′-AGGTCAACTAGTTCAGTATGGAC-3′) and rpoB-r (5′-AAGAACCGTAACCGGCAACTT-3′), according to the method of de Clerck et al. (2004). Reactions were carried out in 50-μl reaction mixtures containing 10 pmol of each primer, 200 µM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (Thermo Scientific), 10 µl of 5 × One Taq Standard Reaction buffer, 1.25 U of One Taq Hot Start DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific) and 100 ng of genomic DNA. DNA amplification was performed in a programmable thermal cycler (MultiGene OptiMax, Labnet International) with an initial denaturation step (94 °C, 30 s), followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 30 s), primer annealing (51 °C, 30 s) and elongation (68 °C, 60 s). Cycling was completed by a final elongation step (68 °C, 10 min), followed by cooling to 4 °C. The resultant amplicons were purified with the DNA Clean and Concentrator™-25 kit (Zymo Research, Inqaba Biotechnical Industries, Hatfield Pretoria, South Africa), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed using BigDye Cycle Sequencing chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Johannesburg, South Africa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Sequence similarity searches were done using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) algorithm (Altschul et al. 1990), and the results indicated that the rpoB gene sequences which were amplified from each of the 104 Bacillus isolates were most similar to the rpoB gene sequences from either B. amyloliquefaciens or B. subtilis. A data matrix of the representative rpoB gene sequences, based on sequence similarities at each sampling location (juice screen and mixed juice tank) for each of the two sampling occasions (when low and high dextran levels were reported in the produced sugar, respectively), was created. Reference strain rpoB gene sequences were retrieved from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The data matrix was edited using the BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor program (Hall 1999) and the sequences aligned using CLUSTAL W (Thompson et al. 1994). A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) algorithm with the Tamura 3-parameter method (Tamura 1992) using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016). The strengths of the internal branches of the resultant tree were statistically evaluated by bootstrap analysis (Felsenstein 1985) with 1000 bootstrap replications. The tree was rooted by B. licheniformis NRRL NRS-1264T as the outgroup.
Results and discussion
Amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA)
Isolates were grouped according to the areas they were sampled from, i.e., the juice screen and the mixed juice tank, at times when raw sugar with either low or high dextran levels was produced. The number of isolates that displayed identical banding patterns is indicated in brackets, above the line numbers in Fig. 1. Identical banding patterns were obtained for all 104 isolates when amplified 16S rDNA was digested with restriction enzymes CfoI (HhaI) and HinfI (Fig. 1). However, two different DNA profiles were obtained when the amplified DNA were digested with RsaI (Fig. 1). The sizes of the DNA fragments corresponded to the fragment sizes reported when amplified 16S rDNA of B. subtilis MTCC 2451 and B. amyloliquefaciens MTCC 1270 were digested with RsaI, CfoI and HinfI (Jeyaram et al. 2011). Digestion of amplified 16S rDNA of B. subtilis MTCC 2451 with these three enzymes yielded 11 well-separated fragments, whereas amplified 16S rDNA of B. amyloliquefaciens MTCC 1270 yielded 10 DNA fragments (Jeyaram et al. 2011). Based on the two sets of banding patterns obtained, only eight of the 104 isolates were classified as B. subtilis (represented in lanes 4 and 6, Fig. 1). Seven of the isolates (lane 4, Fig. 1) were obtained from a juice screen filtering sugarcane juice, and one isolate (lane 6, Fig. 1) was cultured from the mixed juice tank when sugar with a high dextran content was produced. At this time, most of the bacteria isolated from juice screens (46 isolates, lane 3, Fig. 1) and the mixed juice tank (31 isolates, lane 5, Fig. 1) were identified as B. amyloliquefaciens. No B. subtilis isolates were found when low dextran raw sugar was produced, and of the 19 B. amyloliquefaciens isolates cultured during this time, 14 were from the juice screen (lane 1, Fig. 1) and five from the mixed juice tank (lane 2, Fig. 1).
Amplification and partial sequencing of the rpoB gene
The phylogenetic analysis of 104 partial rpoB gene sequences and representative Bacillus strains (Fig. 2), revealed that most (96) of the isolates clustered with the type strain B. amyloliquefaciens B-14393T (Fig. 2) and confirmed the identifications based on ARDRA. Eight isolates clustered with the type strains of B. subtilis subsp. subtilis (LMG 7135T) and Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum (NRRL B-2305T) and are regarded as members of the species B. subtilis. Of the eight isolates, B7–19 is phylogenetically more closely related to B. subtilis subsp. inaquosorum, and strain B7–37 more closely related to B. subtilis subsp. subtilis (Fig. 2). Results obtained with rpoB gene sequence analyses confirmed the separation of the representative isolates from B. amyloliquefaciens, as reported with ARDRA.
The majority of Bacillus isolates (92%) from cane juice are members of B. amyloliquefaciens. Historically, Leuconostoc mesenteroides has been associated with slime formation on juice screens and was identified as the main contaminant of cane juice in the mixed juice tank. In this study, we have shown that B. amyloliquefaciens, and to a lesser extent B. subtilis, could be responsible for some of the exopolysaccharide (slime or gum) production observed in cane processing factories. B. amyloliquefaciens and B. subtilis are generally not associated with dextran production. However, these bacteria have the ability to produce levan (a fructose-based exopolysaccharide) from sucrose (Marvasi et al. 2010; Tian et al. 2011). Due to the non-specific nature of the modified alcohol haze method used in the sugar industry for dextran quantification (Anon 2015), levan could contribute to what is measured as dextran. Contamination of sugarcane factories with Bacillus spp. would, thus, lead to lower sugar production if sucrose is converted into levan, and the build-up of exopolysaccharides may increase the viscosity of the sugarcane syrup and prevent the crystallization of sucrose (Godshall et al. 1996; Jimenez 2005).
Conclusions
Digestion of amplified 16S rRNA genes with RsaI differentiated B. amyloliquefaciens from B. subtilis. Identification was confirmed by partial sequencing of the rpoB gene. The identification of B. amyloliquefaciens and B. subtilis from a sugar processing factory is significant as these bacteria can contribute to sucrose losses, thus lowering the amount of sugar produced, and possibly producing unwanted metabolites such as exopolysaccharides.
References
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410
Anon (2015) ICUMSA Method GS1/2/9-15 The determination of dextran in raw sugar by a modified alcohol haze method—accepted. In: ICUMSA method book. Verlag Dr Albert Bartens KG, Berlin, Germany
Blackwood KS, Turenne CY, Harmsen D, Kabani AM (2004) Reassessment of sequence-based targets for identification of Bacillus species. J Clin Microbiol 42:1626–1630
de Clerck E, Vanhoutte T, Hebb T, Geerink J, Devos J, de Vos P (2004) Isolation, characterisation and identification of bacterial contaminants in semifinal gelatin extracts. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:3664–3672
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791
Foxon KM, du Clou H (2017) Are gums produced in the factory? Quantification of gums isolated from mixed juice and final molasses. Proc S Afr Sug Technol Ass 90:382–394
Godshall MA, Legendre BL, Clarke MA, Miranda XM, Blanco RS (1996) Starch, polysaccharides and proanthocyanidin in Louisiana sugarcane varieties. Int Sugar J 98:144–148
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Imrie FKE, Tilbury RH (1972) Polysaccharides in sugar cane and its products. Sugar Technol Rev 1:291–361
Jeyaram K, Romi W, Singh TA, Adewumi GA, Basanti K, Oguntoyinbo FA (2011) Distinct differentiation of closely related species of Bacillus subtilis group with industrial importance. J Microbiol Methods 87:161–164
Jimenez ER (2005) The dextranase along sugar-making industry. Biotecnologia Aplicada 22:20–27
Ki J-S, Zhang W, Qian P-Y (2009) Discovery of marine Bacillus species by 16S rRNA and rpoB comparisons and their usefulness for species identification. J Microbiol Methods 77:48–57
Kulkarni VM (1999) A novel method to evaluate efficacy of mill sanitation biocides: reducing sugar and titrable acidity analysis of final molasses. Sugar Tech 1:54–62
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874
Lillehoj EB, Clarke MA, Tsang WSC (1984) Leuconostoc spp. in sugarcane processing samples. Proc Sug Proc Res Inst 1984:144–151
Marvasi M, Visscher PT, Martinez LC (2010) Exopolymeric substances (EPS) from Bacillus subtilis: polymers and genes encoding their synthesis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 313:1–9
Mollet C, Drancourt M, Raoult D (1997) rpoB sequence analysis as a novel basis for bacterial identification. Mol Microbiol 25:1005–1011
Nel S (2014) Microbial diversity profiling in sugarcane processing: what, why and how? Proc S Afr Sug Technol Ass 87:246–254
Nel S, Davis SB, Endo A, Dicks LMT (2019) Microbial diversity profiling of polysaccharide (gum)-producing bacteria isolated from a South African sugarcane processing factory. Curr Microbiol 76:527–535
Rein P (2007) Cane sugar engineering. Verlag Dr. Albert Bartens KG, Berlin
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425
Solomon S (2000) Post-harvest cane deterioration and its milling consequences. Sugar Tech 2:1–18
Tamura K (1992) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol 9:678–687
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680
Tian F, Inthanavong L, Karboune S (2011) Purification and characterisation of levansucrases from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in intra- and extracellular forms uselful for the synthesis of levan and fructooligosaccharides. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 75:1929–1938
Wang L-T, Lee F-L, Tai C-J, Kasai H (2007) Comparison of gyrB gene sequences, 16S rRNA gene sequences and DNA–DNA hybridization in the Bacillus subtilis group. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1846–1850
Wang L-T, Lee F-L, Tai C-J, Kuo H-P (2008) Bacillus velezensis is a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:671–675
Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) 16S ribosomal DNA amplificaion for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703
Woese CR (1987) Bacterial evolution. Microbiol Rev 51:221–271
Wu X-Y, Walker MJ, Hornitzky M, Chin J (2006) Development of a group-specific PCR combined with ARDRA for the identification of Bacillus species of environmental significance. J Microbiol Methods 64:107–119
Acknowledgements
DNA sequencing was performed by Dr Deborah Sweby (South African Sugarcane Research Institute, Mt Edgecombe, South Africa).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nel, S., Davis, S.B., Endo, A. et al. Differentiation between Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis isolated from a South African sugarcane processing factory using ARDRA and rpoB gene sequencing. Arch Microbiol 201, 1453–1457 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-019-01698-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-019-01698-w