Abstract
Probiotics are live cultures, usually lactic acid bacteria, which are ingested to promote a healthy gastrointestinal tract. These organisms require certain traits to survive and compete in this niche, but these traits may be transferred to other microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Similarly, virulence factors from pathogens may be acquired by probiotic strains. Bacteria have developed a plethora of methods to transfer genetic material between strains, species and genera. In this review, the possible factors that may be exchanged and the methods of exchange are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The term “lactic acid bacteria” encompasses a large amount of heterogeneous bacteria that are inextricably linked to humans and animals. These organisms occur naturally in diverse environments, such as, the gastrointestinal, oral and respiratory tracts and in food-related environments, such as, milk-, meat-, plant products and wine. The human gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is an extremely complex environment that may be colonized by up to 1012 bacteria per gram of intestinal contents (Gueimonde and Salminen 2004). Although microorganisms colonize the gastrointestinal tract from the oral cavity to the rectum, most studies on the effect of probiotics have focussed on the tract from the stomach downwards, including the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum and colon. The stomach and duodenum contain between 101 and 103 colony forming units per ml (CFU/ml), comprising predominantly lactobacilli, streptococci and yeasts, while the jejenum and ileum (104–108 CFU/ml) contain lactobacilli, Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci, Bacteroides spp., bifidobacteria and fusobacteria and the colon (1010–1012 CFU/g) Bacteroides spp., bifidobacteria, streptococci, fusobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, clostridia, Veillonella spp., lactobacilli, Proteus spp., staphylococci, Pseudomonas spp., yeasts and protozoa (Holzapfel et al. 1998). The colon microflora is dominated by strict anaerobic organisms (Holzapfel et al. 1998). Other organisms present in the human colon include methanogens such as Methanobrevibacter smithii and Methanosphaera stadmaniae (Brusa et al. 1993; Zhang et al. 2009). These organisms belong to the domain Archea and differ vastly from bacteria, and though they may have genetic elements that could contribute to horizontal gene exchange, they are not considered here.
Possible colonization of the oral cavity, pharynx and oesophagus by probiotics has largely been ignored, even though a large number of microorganisms colonize these areas in healthy humans (King et al. 2002; Lawson and Coyle 2010; Tian et al. 2010). Gene transfer may conceivably occur in all these areas if the probiotics and prevailing organisms are in contact long enough.
Although the composition of the intestinal microbiota may differ for every individual, microorganisms form a barrier between the host and the environment and play an essential role in protecting the host from pathogens and harmful food substances (Gueimonde and Salminen 2004). Within this niche, however, it is possible that genes may be transferred between different gut microbiota, gut microbiota and pathogens, or between pathogens, to adapt to an ever-changing environment. Of particular concern is the acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes and virulence traits by non-pathogenic organisms. Transfer of genes between bacteria is well documented, although research studies have focused on horizontal (or lateral) gene transfer (HGT) between pathogens, such as the spread of multidrug resistance (Ochman et al. 2000).
Since lactic acid bacteria (LAB) form a significant part of the microbiota of a healthy human intestinal tract, increasing use, and research into the health benefits of probiotics, defined as viable microbial food supplements beneficial to health, has lead to a vast amount of research information being available on this subject (Dicks and Botes 2010; Mattila-Sandholm et al. 1999; Salminen et al. 2004; Tamime 2005). These organisms, by nature of the use of probiotics, come into close contact with other intestinal bacteria, including pathogens, making the issue of HGT relevant.
Probiotics are usually lactobacilli, enterococci and/or bifidobacteria. Health benefits attributed to probiotics include antimicrobial activity, prevention of diarrhoea, improved lactose metabolism, anti-mutagenic and carcinogenic properties, reduced serum cholesterol and stimulation of the immune system (Shah 2007). An effective probiotic is need to adhere to epithelial cells, survive conditions such as low pH, pepsin and pancreatin activity and bile, and competitively exclude pathogens (Maragkoudakis et al. 2006; Vankerckhoven et al. 2008). An additional trait such as bacteriocin production is an added advantage. In addition to acquiring virulence traits from other organisms, however, the possibility exists that the very attributes that define a good probiotic may also be transferred to other organisms, including pathogens.
Evidence of horizontal gene transfer between lactic acid bacteria and enteric bacteria, and between different lactic acid bacteria has been reported (Bolotin et al. 2004b). Comparative genomic analysis of Lactococcus lactis suggests a fairly recent horizontal gene transfer event between lactococci and Gram-negative enterobacteria of the gene ycdB, the function of which is unknown. Several factors support this theory: The G + C content of the gene is closer to that of lactococci than enterobacteria. ycdB does not occur in species phylogenetically closer related to enteric bacteria. In lactococci, streptococci and enterococci, there is conservation of the gene order upstream of ycdB, which is only found in very closely related species of enterobacteria. Conserved gene order indicates a common ancestor, while the absence thereof points to lateral gene transfer (Bolotin et al. 2004b).
Within the lactic acid bacteria, the “Lactobacillus acidophilus group” consists of several phylogenetically closely related lactobacilli. These include Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, which is extensively used for yogurt production, and Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus johnsonii, isolated from the human gut. Based on protein phylogenetic analysis, Nicolas et al. (2007) concluded that while extensive genetic exchange took place between L acidophilus and L. johnsonii, little or no transfer took place between L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and L. johnsonii. Nicolas et al. (2007) suggested that the environment where these organisms occur played a role in the horizontal gene transfer events.
Gene transfer capability
Lactic acid bacteria are masters in adaptation. This is reflected in the relatively small size of their genomes, 1.7–3.3 Mbp, containing a variety of genes between 1,600 and 3,000, indicating that adaptation has involved both gene loss and acquisition (Horvath et al. 2009; Makarova and Koonin 2007). Comparative genome sequence analysis of lactic acid bacteria has provided some insight into the historical development of these genomes (Makarova and Koonin 2007; Makarova et al. 2006; Pfeiler and Klaenhammer 2007). These organisms have adapted to grow in nutrient rich environments.
Natural gene transfer usually occurs through the uptake of naked DNA (transformation), viruses (transduction), or plasmids (conjugation; Sorek et al. 2007). The existence of these gene transfer systems has long been established and was recently reviewed (Thomas and Nielsen 2005). Of these mechanisms, conjugation is thought to be prevalent in the transfer of antibiotic gene transfers (Mathur and Singh 2005). Comparative genomics suggests that the organization of genomes of various organisms in the gut is such that they may adapt to an environment (Morelli et al. 2004).
Whole plasmids or segments of genomic DNA may be taken up by transformation. Many human pathogenic bacteria, such as species of Campylobacter, Haemophilus, Helicobacter, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus, are naturally transformable (Thomas and Nielsen 2005).
Transduction occurs when bacterial DNA is inadvertently included into the DNA of bacteriophages during replication, causing the transfer of foreign DNA to other bacterial genomes in subsequent bacterial infections (Sørensen et al. 2005). While bacteriophages occur in abundance and can horizontally transfer genes by incorporation into host genomes, they usually have a limited host range (Sørensen et al. 2005). Numerous lactic acid bacteria have been determined to harbour bacteriophages (Yasmin et al. 2010) and those that occur in Lactococcus spp. in particular have been studied intensively because of their deleterious effects on dairy fermentations (Forde and Fitzgerald 1999). Bacteriophages often carry virulence factors (Sørensen et al. 2005).
Conjugative transfer of DNA is mediated by cell-to-cell contact, mating-pair formation and DNA transfer through conjugative pili, a process that usually results in the acquisition of a plasmid (Sørensen et al. 2005; Thomas and Nielsen 2005). In lactic acid bacteria, this method of DNA transfer has been observed most often. In enterococci, conjugative transfer systems may be activated through pheromone production by plasmid-free recipient strains to induce a mating response by donor cells harbouring members of specific families of conjugative plasmids (Clewell et al. 2002). This response initiates the activation of membrane proteins that promote aggregation of donors and recipients (Thomas and Nielsen 2005). Other bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus produce similar peptides that may induce enterococci to aggregate (Flannagan and Clewell 2002). This observation indicates that pheromone-inducible plasmids, which are highly transmissible, may facilitate the spread of virulence traits between different species of enterococci, and between enterococci and pathogens (Flannagan and Clewell 2002).
A significant percentage of lateral gene transfer can be attributed to mobile genetic elements, such as, plasmids, insertion sequences, transposons and introns (Ochman et al. 2000). Since these elements are widespread in lactic acid bacteria, these organisms have the ability to exchange genetic information between strains of the same species, different species, or different genera (Morelli et al. 2004).
Plasmids give bacteria the ability to acquire traits that are competitively advantageous in specific niches, for example antibiotic resistance and the ability to use particular carbon sources (Sørensen et al. 2005). Successful plasmid acquisition and stability depend on various factors such as copy number and host specificity. Genes encoding numerous virulence factors occur on plasmids: In Enterococcus faecalis, the bee operon encoding pili is located on a conjugative plasmid (Hendrickx et al. 2009). In Lactococcus lactis, several important traits such as lactose catabolism, bacteriocin production, proteolytic systems and bacteriophage resistance are plasmid encoded. These characteristics may be horizontally transferred for competitive advantage (Siezen et al. 2005).
Mahillon and Chandler (1998) defined insertion sequences (IS) as segments of DNA smaller than 2.5 kb that are capable of inserting at multiple sites in a target molecule. These segments of DNA are phenotypically cryptic and have a simple genetic organization. These elements can be as short as 600–700 bp, encoding a transposase. In the genomes of bacteria, the presence of several closely related IS elements facilitate recombination events that may also include sections of unrelated DNA (Thomas and Nielsen 2005).
Several mobile elements have been found in lactobacilli, including ISL2 in Lactobacillus helveticus, ISL3 in Lactobacillus delbrueckii, IS1223 in Lctobacillus johnsonii, IS1163 and IS1520 in Lactobacillus sakei and ISLp11 in Lactobacillus plantarum (Nicoloff and Bringel 2003). DNA sequence comparisons of various LAB indicated that during cheese manufacturing it was possible for insertion elements to be horizontally transferred, most likely through conjugation (Guédon et al. 1998).
Conjugative transposons are widespread in lactic acid bacteria and have been found to confer resistance to tetracycline, erythromycin, chloramphenicol and kanamycin, code for nisin production and sucrose fermentation (Mathur and Singh 2005). These genetic elements have a large host range, vary in size from 16 to 70 kb, and may be inserted into plasmids or chromosomal genes in one or multiple copies (Mathur and Singh 2005). The role that conjugative transposons play in the spread of antibiotic resistance is indicated by similar resistance genes present in diverse bacterial species (Scott 2002). In a review by Burrus and Waldor (2004), conjugative transposons are termed integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs), since they are self-transmissible mobile genetic elements and spread by conjugative transfer to new hosts. The authors also proposed that ICEs promote the mobilization of genomic islands.
In 2000, Mojica et al. described the occurrence of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) found in a wide diversity of prokaryotes. These elements are short palindromic sequences 24–40 bp in length that contain highly reserved inner and terminal inverted repeats of up to 11 bp and are usually adjacent to CRISPR-associated (cas) genes (Godde and Bickerton 2006; Horvath et al. 2009). More than one CRISPR locus may occur in a particular genome, and wide variation occurs in the CRISPR loci of strains of the same species (Bolotin et al. 2004a; Godde and Bickerton 2006). CRISPRs provide acquired resistance to phages (Horvath et al. 2009).
Integrons are immobile elements, but they contain gene cassettes that may be mobilized (Fluit and Schmitz 1999). The most common gene cassettes that occur on integrons are those that encode antibiotic resistance.
Pathogenicity islands are gene clusters with more than one virulence gene that are absent in non-pathogenic bacteria. These DNA fragments may occupy relatively large genome regions, which often differ in its G + C content from the host. These islands are frequently associated with mobile genetic elements and usually flanked by direct repeats (Schmidt and Hensel 2004). A 154 kb pathogenicity island has been identified in E. faecalis containing genes encoding cytolysin, enterococcus surface protein, several unknown genes and mobile genetic elements including a transposase (Schmidt and Hensel 2004; Shankar et al. 2004).
Evidence of potential in vivo horizontal gene transfer
Over the last 30 years, a vast number of publications have reported the in vitro transfer ability of various plasmids, transposons and other mobile genetic elements inter- and intraspecies and is beyond the scope of this review. The focus of this review will be on in vivo transfer where either donors or recipients are lactic acid bacteria, including probiotics.
Numerous cases of in vivo horizontal gene transfer studies, primarily in the gut of gnotobiotic mice, have been reported. In terms of virulence, in vivo studies mostly reported transfer of antibiotic resistance, including resistance to vancomycin, tetracycline and erythromycin. In vivo studies by Bourgeois-Nicolaos et al. (2006) indicated that vancomycin A (vanA) resistance could be transferred more readily from animals to humans by Enterococcus faecium than by E. faecalis. Moubareck et al. (2003) also reported the transfer of vanA from porcine to human enterococci in the gastrointestinal tract of mice. Mater et al. (2005) reported that the vanA gene cluster could be transferred between enterococci without selective pressure. In a later study by the same authors (Mater et al. 2008), the transfer of vanA resistance from E. faecium to a commercially available probiotic strain of L. acidophilus was achieved in vivo.
Doucet-Populaire et al. (1992) observed the transfer of the conjugative plasmid pAT191 from E. faecalis to Escherichia coli in mice, conferring kanamycin resistance. Variable results were obtained by other authors who also demonstrated transfer of conjugative plasmids between L. lactis and E. faecalis (Gruzza et al. 1993, 1994; Igimi et al. 1996). Jacobsen et al. (2007) proved that tetracycline and erythromycin resistance could be transferred from L. plantarum to E. faecalis in the gastrointestinal tracts of gnotobiotic rats. Morelli et al. (1988) found that transfer of antibiotic resistance genes between two enteric lactic acid bacteria was not affected by the presence of subtherapeutic levels of antibiotic in the diet or water. Licht et al. (2002) used a streptomycin-treated mini-pig to determine the transfer of the pheromone-inducible pCF10 plasmid between strains of E. faecalis. Their results also indicated that this plasmid could be transferred even in the absence of selective pressure, with subsequent persistence of the plasmid in colonized strains.
The transfer of other virulence factors has also been researched. Huycke et al. (1992) observed the transfer of pheromone-responsive plasmids, which often carry genes encoding cytolysin and other virulence genes between strains of E. faecalis in the GIT of Syrian hamsters. Hirt et al. (2002) concluded that E. faecalis strains carrying the pCF10 plasmid showed increased virulence in a rabbit endocarditis model.
Launay et al. (2006) reported the transfer of transposon Tn1549 containing the vancomycin B2 operon from Clostridium symbiosum to E. faecium and E. faecalis in the GIT of gnotobiotic mice. Similarly, the transfer of conjugative transposon Tn1545 with a tetracycline resistance gene from E. faecalis to Listeria monocytogenes was observed (Doucet-Populaire et al. 1991). Bahl et al. (2004) studied the in vivo transfer of Tn916 conferring tetracycline resistance amongst strains of E. faecalis. While transfer took place, some tetracycline-sensitive strains also persisted in the intestines of gnotobiotic rats.
Coburn et al. (2007) observed the transfer of a 150 kb pathogenicity island between two E. faecalis strains in the mouse gastrointestinal tract.
Pathogenicity
Pathogenicity, or virulence, has been extensively reviewed by several authors (Arnold et al. 2007; de Sousa 2003; Finlay and Falkow 1997; Jett et al. 1994). Although most bacteria are harmless, the interaction between a host and a bacterium may in certain instances result in the deterioration of the health of the host, to varying degrees. Pathogenic bacteria may be either primary or opportunistic and have specialized traits to be able to compete for colonization of host tissue and cause disease. In addition, several virulence factors have been identified that distinguish a pathogen from non-virulent organisms (de Sousa 2003). Bacteria may develop spontaneous variation in virulence due to small genomic changes, either within a nucleotide sequence, redistribution of sections of DNA within the genome, or by acquiring DNA from other organisms (de Sousa 2003). These changes may be accelerated when an organism is exposed to stress, either by the host defence system or by the environmental stress outside the host (Arnold et al. 2007).
Although lactic acid bacteria are generally regarded as safe and do not usually cause disease, isolated cases of infections have been reported in patients receiving antibiotic treatment or that were severely immune compromised (Bernardeau et al. 2008; Vesterlund et al. 2007). In these patients, endocarditis, bacteraemia and localized infections, such as abdominal abscesses, pulmonary infections and peritonitis, are the most common reported diseases caused by Lactobacillus spp. (Slover 2008).
Enterococci, mostly E. faecalis and E. faecium, are predominant organisms in the human intestinal tract. These two species, together with Enterococcus durans, are frequently isolated from human faeces (Franz and Holzapfel 2004). Although enterococci are widely distributed in food products, used as starter cultures and are potentially good probiotics, these organisms are opportunistic pathogens that frequently cause nosocomial infections and have intrinsic low-level resistance to several antimicrobial products, including beta-lactams, clindamycin, lincomycin, aminoglycosides and tetracycline (Franz and Holzapfel 2004; Murray 1990). Several virulence factors have been identified in enterococci (Eaton and Gasson 2001; Franz and Holzapfel 2004).
Factors involved in virulence
Acquired antibiotic resistance
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria occur in high numbers in animals and humans regularly treated with antibiotics (Teuber et al. 1999). While antibiotic resistance in itself is not pathogenic, the emergence of multiple resistant bacteria and the possibility that genes encoding antibiotic resistance may be transferred between starter cultures, probiotics, commensal bacteria and pathogens in the gut, are of great concerns (Ammor et al. 2007; Salyers et al. 2004; Zhou et al. 2005). Lactobacilli, pediococci and leuconostocs have a high intrinsic resistance to vancomycin (Mathur and Singh 2005). Danielsen and Wind (2003) reported natural resistance by some lactobacilli to antibiotics, such as, bacitracin, fucidic acid, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, kanamycin, metronidazole, nitrofurantoin, norfloxacin, streptomycin, sulphadiazine, teicoplanin and trimethroprim/sulphamethoxazole. While antibiotic resistance occurs amongst species of LAB, clear-cut patterns have not been determined (Ammor et al. 2007). Great variation in intrinsic antibiotic resistance exists between different species of Lactobacillus (Ammor et al. 2007; Danielsen and Wind 2003). Intrinsic resistance to antibiotics is not horizontally transferable, but a natural trait of a particular organism (Mathur and Singh 2005). The focus in this review will be on acquired antibiotic resistance. Jacobsen et al. (2007) proved that tetracycline and erythromycin resistance plasmids from L. plantarum could be horizontally transferred to an E. faecalis strain in the gastrointestinal tract of rats. In the context of HGT, it has been demonstrated that enterococci may acquire transferable resistance to vancomycin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin and clindamycin (Murray 1990).
Enterococci are often the causative agents of infections in hospitalized patients and nosocomial bloodstream infections (Vankerckhoven et al. 2008). In enterococci, six vancomycin resistance types have been identified phenotypically and genotypically, and their mechanisms of action have been extensively reviewed by Courvalin (2006). VanC is an intrinsic characteristic of Enterococcus gallinarium and Enterococcus casseliflavus–Enterococcus flavescens, while VanA, VanB, VanD, VanE and VanG can be acquired. The operons encoding VanA and VanB may be located on a plasmid or on the chromosome, while the operons encoding VanC, VanD, VanE and VanG are located on the chromosome. VanA and VanB acquired resistance has been linked with the mobile elements Tn1546 (VanA) and Tn1547 or Tn1549 (VanB; Teuber et al. 1999).
In lactic acid bacteria, scientific evidence points to conjugation as the common method of antibiotic resistance transfer of mobile genetic elements such as plasmids, transposons and integrons.
Virulence factors
A few virulence factors have been reported to date for Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp., both of which are used as probiotics. A possible virulence trait in lactobacilli may be the ability to aggregate human platelets, which have been found in strains of Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus oris, L. plantarum and Lactobacillus salivarius (Harty et al. 1994). Several virulence factors that may be involved in the infection of a host with pathogenic strains have been recognized (Eaton and Gasson 2001; Franz and Holzapfel 2004). Virulence factors may either be colonization factors, such as, adhesions that promote the adhesion of bacteria to the host cell, invasions, which promote invasion of epithelial cells, evasions, which are substances that evade the host immune system such as phagocytosis, the complement system or antibodies, and siderophores, which are produced when iron concentrations are low (de Sousa 2003). Several enterococcal cell wall-anchored surface proteins are implicated in enterococcal pathogenesis, including aggregation substance, enterococcal surface protein, collagen-binding components and pili (Hendrickx et al. 2009). In addition, secreted products produce or promote the formation of lesions in the host, such as exotoxins, which are either active in the cytoplasmic membrane, alter membrane permeability or act enzymatically in the cell, endotoxins, such as lipopolysaccharides from Gram-negative organisms, hydrolytic enzymes such as proteases and hyaluronidase, super antigens, which interact with lymphocyte receptors, and antigens that induce auto-immune diseases (de Sousa 2003; Jett et al. 1994). The genetic determinants of a variety of these factors have been determined:
-
1.
The toxin cytolysin
Cytolysin is an exotoxin with a bifunctional bacteriocin and haemolytic effect (Haas et al. 2002). This toxin, related to lantibiotics and produced by some strains of E. faecalis, causes the invading organism to evade the host immune system (Franz and Holzapfel 2004). This enzyme lyses human, rabbit and horse erythrocytes (Chow et al. 1993) and inhibits Gram-positive but not Gram-negative bacteria (Jett et al. 1994). Cytolysin may either be chromosomally encoded within a pathogenicity island, or by pheromone-responsive plasmids such as pAD1 (Chow et al. 1993; Ike et al. 1984; Shankar et al. 2004,). Eight genes—cylL L , cylL s , cylM, cylB, cylA and cylI transcribed as one operon, and cylR1, cylR2, transcribed as a second operon—encode products necessary for cytolysin production (Shankar et al. 2004). cylL L and cylL s encode two precursors that are posttranslationally modified by CylM. After posttranslational modification, both interact with CylB, an ATP-binding cassette transporter. After secretion, CylLL and CylLS are further modified by CylA, a protease which removes six amino acids from both subunits to form the active toxin units CylLL″ and CylLS″ (Shankar et al. 2004). CylI is an immunity protein. The products encoded by cylR1 and cylR2 are involved with repression of the cytolysin genes. No obvious DNA sequence similarities to enterococcal cylL L and cylL S were observed with BLAST analysis.
-
2.
Enterococcal LPxTG surface proteins
These proteins and their genetic determinants were recently extensively reviewed by Hendrickx et al. (2009) and includes aggregation substance (AS), Enterococcus surface protein (Esp), adhesins and other adhesive molecules such as Enterococcus endocarditis antigen and pili.
Aggregation substance is a plasmid-encoded pheromone-inducible multifunctional LPxTG surface protein produced by E. faecalis. Proteins with the motif LPxTG (Leu-Pro-x (any aa)-Thr-Gly) is a class of cell wall-anchored surface proteins in Gram-positive bacteria that span the cell wall to display functional domains to the surrounding environment (Hendrickx et al. 2009; Isenmann, et al. 2000; Navarre and Schneewind 1999). Three conjugative plasmids, pPD1, pCF10 and pAD1, containing the AS protein encoding genes asp1, asc10 and asa1, respectively, have been characterized. These proteins share high amino acid similarities. Expression of the AS protein enables close contact between cells for conjugation and subsequent transfer of virulence plasmids (Hendrickx et al. 2009). The aggregation substance AS may also play a role in translocation of enterococci into epithelial cells (Franz and Holzapfel 2004; Hendrickx et al. 2009; Mundy et al. 2000). Chow et al. (1993) reported an increase in morbidity of rabbits with endocarditis if the causative enterococcal agent expressed both cytolysin and the aggregation substance as opposed to strains that only expressed one of the traits.
Enterococcus surface protein is produced by strains of E. faecalis and E. faecium. Most of the organisms that produce this protein have been isolated from infection-derived isolates, whereas none isolated from food produce the protein, thus suggesting a role in pathogenicity (Franz and Holzapfel 2004). The protein is chromosomally encoded with a theoretical mass of 202 kDa (Franz and Holzapfel 2004; Shankar et al. 1999). The esp gene is usually contained within a pathogenicity island which is often harboured by clinical E. faecium and E. faecalis strains (Hendrickx et al. 2009). Esp is a cell wall-anchored protein characterized by its ability to form biofilms and may therefore be implicated in enterococcal infections that are biofilm associated, such as, endocarditis, urinary tract-, ocular-, root canal- and implant device-related infections (Heikens et al. 2007; Hendrickx et al. 2009). Heikens et al. (2009) recently reported that Esp did not significantly increase adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells.
MSCRAMMs is a family of surface proteins amongst the host of proteins that pathogenic bacteria have evolved to adhere to and invade host tissues and to evade defence systems. MSCRAMMs share characteristics, such as, an N-terminal signal peptide, an A-domain consisting of folds similar to immunoglobulin, B-domains with more than one repeat and a C-terminal cell wall anchor (Sillanpää et al. 2008, 2009a, b).
Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis produce adhesins Ace and Acm, respectively, which binds to collagen. Ace have been determined to be expressed during human infections, while the gene for Acm is widespread amongst E. faecium, although only expressed by clinical isolates, indicating a link with virulence (Franz and Holzapfel 2004). Ace and Acm share some similarity in protein sequence (Hall et al. 2007). Sillanpää et al. (2008, 2009a, b) have identified numerous predicted MSCRAMMs in the genome of E. faecalis and E. faecium, based on sequence analysis.
Expression of the adhesin-like endocarditis antigens produced by E. faecalis has been shown to be induced by E. faecalis growth in serum (Franz and Holzapfel 2004). Teng et al. (2003) identified an antigen, SagA, which was essential for E. faecium growth, and also bound to fibrinogen, collagens, fibronectin and laminin. Genome sequencing of Leuconostoc kimchii, a lactic acid bacterium isolated from Korean vegetable products, indicated the presence of a similar protein to endocarditis antigen found in enterococci, suggesting that the genes encoding this factor may be widely spread.
Pili play an important role in initial adherence to host tissues, followed by colonization of mucosal surfaces (Hendrickx et al. 2009). Pili are localized cell-surface proteinaceous filaments, and the genes encoding enterococcal pili are arranged in operons with at least one sortase gene. Two pilin gene clusters, the biofilm enhancer pili operon (bee) and the endocarditis- and biofilm-associated pili operon (ebp), have been described for E. faecalis. Four pilin gene clusters have been found in E. faecium, and their exact role in pathogenicity is the focus of ongoing research (Hendrickx et al. 2009).
Genome sequencing of L. rhamnosus GG has revealed the presence of two pilin gene clusters, spaCBA and spaFED. The spaFED gene cluster was also found in L. rhamnosus LC705. No homology was found between these clusters and other bacterial pilin genes, although some similarity was found in the protein sequences of pilin proteins found in E. faecalis and E. faecium (Kankainen et al. 2009). spaCBA, only found in the probiotic L. rhamnosus GG, was determined to encode mucus binding pili.
-
3.
Gelatinase
Gelatinase is a protease involved in the hydrolysis of substrates, such as, gelatin, casein, collagen, haemoglobin and small bioactive proteins such as E. faecalis sex pheromone-related peptides (Archimbaud et al. 2002; Jett et al. 1994; Makinen et al. 1989). This extracellular zink-metalloendopeptidase was first characterized more than 40 years ago, but its contribution towards virulence of a particular isolate has not been established, although the protein is often expressed by clinical E. faecalis isolates (Bleiweis and Zimmerman 1964; Casas and Zimmerman 1969; Grutter and Zimmerman 1955; Shugart and Beck 1964). Gelatinase production is usually associated with enterococci from clinical samples, but has also been detected in enterococci isolated from dairy and meat products (Lopes et al. 2006).
Studies on 29 clinical strains of E. faecalis isolated from patients with endocarditis (10) or bacteremia (10) or from stools of healthy volunteers (9; Archimbaud et al. 2002) indicated that gelatinase was produced by isolates from both ill and healthy groups, and in itself was not essential for pathogenesis. Although the virulent effect of gelatinase has not been conclusively demonstrated, gelatinase production may be correlated with the presence of the cytolysin gene (Archimbaud et al. 2002), gentamicin resistance (Dupont et al. 1998) and collagen binding in root canal infections (Hubble et al. 2003), indicating a possible role in pathogenesis. gelE is often found in clinical E. faecalis strains but Dupre et al. (2003) could not detect the gelE gene in 32 clinical E. faecium strains, as opposed to 11 of 15 strains of E. faecalis. Similar observations were reported by Elsner et al. (2000) and Kanemitsu et al. (2001). In contrast, gelatinase activity and the gelE gene were detected in the species E. faecalis, E. faecium, E. durans and E. hirae, isolated from raw ewe’s milk and cheese by Lopes et al. (2006), E. faecalis, E. faecium and E. casseliflavus isolated from house flies (Macovei and Zurek 2006). Joyanes et al. (2000) found that gelatinase played no role in adhesion of E. faecalis or E. faecium to surfaces such as urinary catheters.
The gene encoding gelatinase, gelE, was sequenced by Su et al. (1991). In E. faecalis, gelE is not plasmid encoded, while expression of GelE is regulated by the fsr locus (Arias et al. 2007; Dupont et al. 1998; Qin et al. 2001). Genotypic and phenotypic investigations by Creti et al. (2004) indicated that although gelE was present in both clinical and commensal isolates, it was not always expressed. Their results also showed that gelatinase was more often produced by invasive than non-invasive E. faecalis strains. BLAST analysis indicates that, to date, gelE only occurs in enterococci.
-
4.
Hyaluronidase
The role of hyaluronidase in infection has been extensively reviewed (Girish and Kemparaju 2007; Hynes and Walton 2000). Hyaluronidase facilitates the spread of bacteria and toxins through the host tissue by causing tissue damage (Kayaoglu and Orstavik 2004). This enzyme (also called a spreading factor) degrades hyaluronan to disaccharides, which may be transported and metabolized intracellularly to supply pathogens with nutrients (Hynes and Walton 2000; Pecharki et al. 2008; Starr and Engleberg 2006). Microbial hyaluronidase production is linked to enterococcal virulence primarily because the enzyme is linked to pathogenicity through enzymatic degradation of host tissue in other organisms (Franz and Holzapfel 2004; Girish and Kemparaju 2007; Jett et al. 1994). The enzyme is produced by several Gram-positive bacteria, such as, Streptococcus spp, Staphylococcus spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., Propionibacterium spp. and Clostridium spp. Several of these species may cause mucosal or skin infections (Hynes and Walton 2000, Kayaoglu and Orstavik 2004, Pecharki et al. 2008). Rice et al. (2003) reported the sequence of a 1,659 bp ORF, designated hyl Efm, from E. faecium that was homologous to hyaluronidase genes previously reported, but no functional virulence effect was determined. In clinical strains of E. faecium, the hyl Efm gene was carried on large conjugative plasmids (Arias et al. 2009).
-
5.
Extracellular superoxide and sex pheromone
To combat infections, phagocytes produce superoxide (O2 −) and other reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as H2O2 and hydoxyl (Hassett and Cohen 1989). Huycke et al. (1996) assessed the frequency of extracellular superoxide production. Rates of superoxide production produced by E. faecalis and E. faecium strains isolated from bacteremia and endocarditis infections suggested an association between extracellular superoxide production and invasiveness of the organism (Huycke et al. 1996, Mundy et al. 2000). Superoxide production is induced by sex pheromones, which also induce the secretion of lysosomal enzymes (Franz and Holzapfel 2004). The production of a sex pheromone was first described by Dunny et al. (1978) who characterized a substance initially described as a clumping-inducing agent because it caused donor cells to aggregate. This substance was subsequently redefined as a sex pheromone since it is produced by recipient cells to facilitate the transfer of certain conjugative plasmids by donor cells in E. faecalis. One such plasmid, the conjugative tetracycline resistance pCF10, has been extensively characterized (Dunny et al. 1985; Tortorello and Dunny 1985; Tortorello et al. 1986). Sex pheromones are therefore also considered to be virulence factors (Eaton and Gasson 2001). BLAST analysis of the DNA sequence for pheromone-responsive conjugative vancomycin resistance plasmids (Genbank accession number AB247327) isolated from E. faecalis (Lim et al. 2006) indicated that substantial sections of this plasmid occurred in organisms other than enterococci.
Transferable traits of probiotics
Bacteriocins
Bacteriocins are ribosomally synthesized peptides produced by microorganisms that usually exhibit antimicrobial activity against organisms closely related to the producing bacteria (Van Reenen et al. 2003). In addition to the requirements necessary for an organism to be a good probiotic, bacteriocin production may be an added advantage. Bacteriocin genes may be on the chromosome or on plasmids. The bacteriocin pediocin PA-1 is produced by several different species such as Pediococcus acidilactici, Pediococcus parvulus, Pediococcus pentosaceus, L. plantarum and Bacillus coagulans (Bennik et al. 1997; Le Marrec et al. 2000; Mora et al. 2000; Miller et al. 2005; Todorov and Dicks 2009). The operon encoding this bacteriocin is usually found on a plasmid suggesting some kind of transfer, although little homology occurs between the rest of the plasmid DNA sequence or the proteins encoded. These proteins often encode mobilizable elements.
Resistance to bile
One of the criteria for probiotics is to have resistance to bile for survival in the gastrointestinal tract, and several bile salt hydrolases have been identified (Begley et al. 2006). Bile is produced in the liver, concentrated in the gall bladder and released into the duodenum, where it aids fat digestion by emulsifying and solubilizing lipids. It is a powerful antimicrobial substance and consists mainly of bile acids, cholesterol and phospholipids (Begley et al. 2005, 2006). Primary bile acids are produced in the liver from cholesterol. Secondary bile acids are produced in the intestine through modification of primary bile acids by bacterial enzymes (Begley et al. 2005). The enzyme bile salt hydrolase (BSH) detoxifies bile by deconjugating bile acids.
Bile salt hydrolase activity has been identified in bacterial species of several genera associated with the gastrointestinal tract, including Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium and Bacteroides. The enzyme is also produced by the opportunistic pathogen E. faecalis and other pathogens such as L. monocytogenes and Xanthomonas maltophilia.
Several authors have speculated on the role of horizontal gene transfer in regard to BSH (Begley et al. 2006; Elkins et al. 2001; McAuliffe et al. 2005). By comparing genomes, Dussurget et al. (2002) found a BSH in L. monocytogenes that was absent from the genome of Listeria innocua, although the flanking regions were similar, and which showed 67% similarity to the amino acid sequence of a L. plantarum BSH. Listeria monocytogenes shares similar environments to lactobacilli, such as the intestine and food. Tanaka et al. (2000) found 37 to 48% identity between the BSH amino acid sequence of Bifidobacterium longum SBT2928 and the BSH of several lactobacilli, and 36% identity to C. perfringens BSH. Some probiotic strains have multiple BSHs (Begley et al. 2006). Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM expresses two BSA encoded by the genes bshA and bshB. These proteins have different amino acid sequences and substrate specificities and show similarity to BSH enzymes from other lactobacilli (McAuliffe et al. 2005). Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 expresses several different BSHs (Bron et al. 2006).
Conclusions
Horizontal gene transfer allows an organism to effectively compete in a new environment. Since microbial genomes stay more or less constant in size, microorganisms must acquire and lose DNA by retaining those genes whose functions prove useful (Lawrence 1999). In an ever-changing environment such as the gastrointestinal tract, one may speculate that the introduction of new organisms such as probiotics may eventually lead to the acquisition or loss of specific functions. Fortunately, universal trends indicate that interspecies recombination decreases exponentially with sequence divergence (Majewski et al. 2000). Studies by Maisonneuve et al. (2001) and Duval-Iflah et al. (1998) on the effect of fermented milk on transconjugants in the gastrointestinal tract of mice have indicated that diet may influence the transfer of genetic material and subsequent persistence of transconjugants. Despite the necessity for microbial genomes to adapt and maintain themselves in an environment where they are challenged by horizontal gene transfer, these genomes remain stable (Tønjum et al. 2004). In addition, many horizontally transferred genes are likely to have negative effects on the recipient chromosome, causing eventual death and loss of the deleterious mutations within the population (Thomas and Nielsen 2005).
References
Ammor MS, Belén Flórez A, Mayo B (2007) Antibiotic resistance in non-enterococcal lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. Food Microbiol 24:559–570
Archimbaud C, Shankar N, Forestier C, Baghdayan A, Gilmore MS, Charbonne F, Joly B (2002) In vitro adhesive properties and virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis strains. Res Microbiol 153:75–80
Arias CA, Cortes L, Murray BE (2007) Chaining in enterococci revisited: correlation between chain length and gelatinase phenotype, and gelE and fsrB genes among clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis. J Med Microbiol 56:286–288
Arias CA, Panesso D, Singh KV, Rice LB, Murray BE (2009) Cotransfer of antibiotic resistance genes and a hyl Efm -containing virulence plasmid in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4240–4246
Arnold DL, Jackson RW, Waterfield NR, Mansfield JW (2007) Evolution of microbial virulence: the benefits of stress. Trends Genet 23:293–300
Bahl MI, Sørensen SJ, Hansen LH, Licht TR (2004) Effect of tetracycline on transfer and establishment of the tetracycline-inducible conjugative transposon Tn916 in the guts of gnotobiotic rats. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:758–764
Begley M, Gahan CGM, Hill C (2005) The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:625–651
Begley M, Hill C, Gahan CGM (2006) Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1729–1738
Bennik MHJ, Smid EJ, Gorris LGM (1997) Vegetable-associated Pediococcus parvulus produces pediocin PA-1. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2074–2076
Bernardeau M, Vernoux JP, Henri-Dubernet S, Gueguen M (2008) Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: the Lactobacillus genus. Int J Food Microbiol 126:278–285
Bleiweis AS, Zimmerman LN (1964) Properties of proteinase from Streptococcus faecalis var. liquefaciens. J Bacteriol 88:653–659
Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Renault P, Sorokin A, Ehrlich SD, Kulakauskas S, Lapidus A, Goltsman E, Mazur M, Pusch GD, Fonstein M, Overbeek R, Kyprides N, Purnelle B, Prozzi D, Ngui K, Masuy D, Hancy F, Burteau S, Boutry M, Delcour J, Goffeau A, Hols P (2004a) Complete sequence and comparative genome analysis of the dairy bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. Nat Biotechnol 22:1554–1558
Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Sorokin A, Ehrlich DS (2004b) Recent genetic transfer between Lactococcus lactis and enterobacteria. J Bacteriol 186:6671–6677
Bourgeois-Nicolaos N, Moubareck C, Mangeney N, Butel M, Doucet-Populaire F (2006) Comparative study of vanA gene transfer from Enterococcus faecium to Enterococcus faecalis and to Enterococcus faecium in the intestine of mice. FEMS Microbiol Lett 254:27–33
Bron PA, Molenaar D, De Vos WM, Kleerebezem M (2006) DNA micro-array-based identification of bile-responsive genes in Lactobacillus plantarum. J Appl Microbiol 100:728–738
Brusa T, Canzi E, Allievi L, Del Puppo E, Ferrari A (1993) Methanogens in the human intestinal tract and oral cavity. Curr Microbiol 27:261–265
Burrus V, Waldor MK (2004) Shaping bacterial genomes with integrative and conjugative elements. Res Microbiol 155:376–386
Casas IA, Zimmerman LN (1969) Dependence of protease secretion by Streptococcus faecalis var. liquefaciens on arginine and its possible relation to site of synthesis. J Bacteriol 97:307–312
Chow JW, Thal LA, Perri MB, Vazquez JA, Donabedian SM, Clewell DB, Zervos MJ (1993) Plasmid-associated hemolysin and aggregation substance production contribute to virulence in experimental enterococcal endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:2474–2477
Clewell DB, Francia MV, Flannagan SE, An FY (2002) Enterococcal plasmid transfer: sex pheromones, transfer origins, relaxases, and the Staphylococcus aureus issue. Plasmid 48:193–201
Coburn PS, Baghdayan AS, Dolan GT, Shankar N (2007) Horizontal transfer of virulence genes encoded on the Enterococcus faecalis pathogenicity island. Mol Microbiol 63:530–544
Courvalin P (2006) Vancomycin resistance in gram-positive cocci. Clin Infect Dis 42(Suppl 1):S25–S34
Creti R, Imperi M, Bertuccini L, Fabretti F, Orefici G, Di Rosa R, Baldassarri L (2004) Survey for virulence determinants among Enterococcus faecalis isolated from different sources. J Med Microbiol 53:13–20
Danielsen M, Wind A (2003) Susceptibility of Lactobacillus spp. to antimicrobial agents. Int J Food Microbiol 82:1–11
de Sousa CP (2003) Pathogenicity mechanisms of prokaryotic cells: an evolutionary view. Braz J Infect Dis 7:23–31
Dicks LMT, Botes M (2010) Probiotic lactic acid bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract: health benefits, safety and mode of action. Benef Microbes 1:11–29
Doucet-Populaire F, Trieu-Cuot P, Dosbaa I, Andremont A, Courvalin P (1991) Inducible transfer of conjugative transposon Tn1545 from Enterococcus faecalis to Listeria monocytogenes in the digestive tracts of gnotobiotic mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35:185–187
Doucet-Populaire F, Trieu-Cuot P, Andremont A, Courvalin P (1992) Conjugal transfer of plasmid DNA from Enterococcus faecalis to Escherichia coli in digestive tracts of gnotobiotic mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:502–504
Dunny GM, Brown BL, Clewell DB (1978) Induced cell aggregation and mating in Streptococcus faecalis: evidence for a bacterial sex pheromone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:3479–3483
Dunny GM, Zimmerman DL, Tortorello ML (1985) Induction of surface exclusion (entry exclusion) by Streptococcus faecalis sex pheromones: use of monoclonal antibodies to identify an inducible surface antigen involved in the exclusion process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:8582–8586
Dupont H, Montravers P, Mohler J, Carbon C (1998) Disparate findings on the role of virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis in mouse and rat models of peritonitis. Infect Immun 66:2570–2575
Dupre I, Zanetti S, Schito AM, Fadda G, Sechi LA (2003) Incidence of virulence determinants in clinical Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis isolates collected in Sardinia (Italy). J Med Microbiol 52:491–498
Dussurget O, Cabanes D, Dehoux P, Lecuit M, Buchrieser C, Glaser P, Cossart P (2002) Listeria monocytogenes bile salt hydrolase is a PrfA-regulated virulence factor involved in the intestinal and hepatic phases of listeriosis. Mol Microbiol 45:1095–1106
Duval-Iflah Y, Maisonneuve S, Ouriet M (1998) Effect of fermented milk intake on plasmid transfer and on the persistence of transconjugants in the digestive tract of gnotobiotic mice. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73:95–102
Eaton TJ, Gasson MJ (2001) Molecular screening of Enterococcus virulence determinants and potential for genetic exchange between food and medical isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1628–1635
Elkins CA, Moser SA, Savage DC (2001) Genes encoding bile salt hydrolases and conjugated bile salt transporters in Lactobacillus johnsonii 100–100 and other Lactobacillus species. Microbiology 147:3403–3412
Elsner HA, Sobottka I, Mack D, Claussen M, Laufs R, Wirth R (2000) Virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium blood culture isolates. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 19:39–42
Finlay BB, Falkow S (1997) Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:136–169
Flannagan SE, Clewell DB (2002) Identification and characterization of genes encoding sex pheromone cAM373 activity in Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 44:803–817
Fluit AC, Schmitz FJ (1999) Class 1 integrons, gene cassettes, mobility, and epidemiology. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 18:761–770
Forde A, Fitzgerald GF (1999) Bacteriophage defence systems in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 76:89–113
Franz CMAP, Holzapfel WH (2004) The genus Enterococcus: biotechnological and safety issues. In: Salminen S, von Wright A, Ouwehand A (eds) Lactic acid bacteria. Microbiological and functional aspects. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
Girish KS, Kemparaju K (2007) The magic glue hyaluronan and its eraser hyaluronidase: a biological overview. Life Sci 80:1921–1943
Godde JS, Bickerton A (2006) The repetitive DNA elements called CRISPRs and their associated genes: evidence of horizontal transfer among prokaryotes. J Mol Evol 62:718–729
Grutter FH, Zimmerman LN (1955) A proteolytic enzyme of Streptococcus zymogenes. J Bacteriol 69:728–732
Gruzza M, Langella P, Duval-Iflah Y, Ducluzeau R (1993) Gene transfer from engineered Lactococcus lactis strains to Enterococcus faecalis in the digestive tract of gnotobiotic mice. Microb Releases 2:121–125
Gruzza M, Fons M, Ouriet MF, Duval-Iflah Y, Ducluzeau R (1994) Study of gene transfer in vitro and in the digestive tract of gnotobiotic mice from Lactococcus lactis strains to various strains belonging to human intestinal flora. Microb Releases 2:183–189
Guédon G, Bourgoin F, Decaris B (1998) Does gene horizontal transfer occur in lactic acid bacteria co-cultures? Lait 78:53–58
Gueimonde M, Salminen S (2004) Methods of analyzing gut microbiota. In: Salminen S, von Wright A, Ouwehand A (eds) Lactic acid bacteria. Microbiological and functional aspects. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
Haas W, Shepard BD, Gilmore MS (2002) Two-component regulator of Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin responds to quorum-sensing autoinduction. Nature 415:84–87
Hall AE, Gorovits EL, Syribeys PJ, Domanski PJ, Ames BR, Chang CY, Vernachio JH, Patti JM, Hutchins JT (2007) Monoclonal antibodies recognizing the Enterococcus faecalis collagen-binding MSCRAMM Ace: conditional expression and binding analysis. Microb Pathog 43:55–66
Harty DW, Oakey HJ, Patrikakis M, Hume EB, Knox KW (1994) Pathogenic potential of lactobacilli. Int J Food Microbiol 24:179–189
Hassett DJ, Cohen MS (1989) Bacterial adaptation to oxidative stress: implications for pathogenesis and interaction with phagocytic cells. FASEB Journal 3:2574–2582
Heikens E, Bonten MJ, Willems RJ (2007) Enterococcal surface protein Esp is important for biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecium E1162. J Bacteriol 189:8233–8240
Heikens E, Leendertse M, Wijnands LM, van Luit-Asbroek M, Bonten MJM, van der Poll T, Willems RJL (2009) Enterococcal surface protein Esp is not essential for cell adhesion and intestinal colonization of Enterococcus faecium in mice. BMC Microbiol: 9:19
Hendrickx APA, Willems RJL, Bonten MJM, van Schaik W (2009) LPxTG surface proteins of enterococci. Trends Microbiol 17:423–430
Hirt H, Schlievert PM, Dunny GM (2002) In vivo induction of virulence and antibiotic resistance transfer in Enterococcus faecalis mediated by the sex pheromone-sensing system of pCF10. Infect Immun 70:716–723
Holzapfel WH, Haberer P, Snel J, Schillinger U, Huis in’t Veld JH (1998) Overview of gut flora and probiotics. Int J Food Microbiol 41:85–101
Horvath P, Coûté-Monvoisin A, Romero DA, Boyaval P, Fremaux C, Barrangou R (2009) Comparative analysis of CRISPR loci in lactic acid bacteria genomes. Int J Food Microbiol 131:62–70
Hubble TS, Hatton JF, Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE, Gillespie MJ (2003) Influence of Enterococcus faecalis proteases and the collagen-binding protein, Ace, on adhesion to dentin. Oral Microbiol Immunol 18:121–126
Huycke MM, Gilmore MS, Jett BD, Booth JL (1992) Transfer of pheromone-inducible plasmids between Enterococcus faecalis in the Syrian hamster gastrointestinal tract. J Infect Dis 166:1188–1191
Huycke MM, Joyce W, Wack MF (1996) Augmented production of extracellular superoxide by blood isolates of Enterococcus faecalis. J Infect Dis 173:743–746
Hynes WL, Walton SL (2000) Hyaluronidases of Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 183:201–207
Igimi S, Ryu CH, Park SH, Sasaki Y, Sasaki T, Kumagai S (1996) Transfer of conjugative plasmid pAMβ1 from Lactococcus lactis to mouse intestinal bacteria. Lett Appl Microbiol 23:31–35
Ike Y, Hashimoto H, Clewell DB (1984) Hemolysin of Streptococcus faecalis subspecies zymogenes contributes to virulence in mice. Infect Immun 45:528–530
Isenmann R, Schwarz M, Rozdzinski E, Marre R, Beger HG (2000) Aggregation substance promotes colonic mucosal invasion of Enterococcus faecalis in an ex vivo model. J Surg Res 89:132–138
Jacobsen L, Wilcks A, Hammer K, Huys G, Gevers D, Andersen SR (2007) Horizontal transfer of tet(M) and erm(B) resistance plasmids from food strains of Lactobacillus plantarum to Enterococcus faecalis JH2–2 in the gastrointestinal tract of gnotobiotic rats. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59:158–166
Jett BD, Huycke MM, Gilmore MS (1994) Virulence of enterococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 7:462–478
Joyanes P, Pascual A, Martinez-Martinez L, Hevia A, Perea EJ (2000) In vitro adherence of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium to urinary catheters. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 19:124–127
Kanemitsu K, Nishino T, Kunishima H, Okamura N, Takemura H, Yamamoto H, Kaku M (2001) Quantitative determination of gelatinase activity among enterococci. J Microbiol Meth 47:11–16
Kankainen M, Paulin L, Tynkkynen S, Von Ossowski I, Reunanen J, Partanen P, Satokari R, Vesterlund S, Hendrickx APA, Lebeer S, De Keersmaecker SCJ, Vanderleyden J, Hämäläinen T, Laukkanen S, Salovuori N, Ritari J, Alatalo E, Korpela R, Mattila-Sandholm T, Lassig A, Hatakka K, Kinnunen KT, Karjalainen H, Saxelin M, Laakso K, Surakka A, Palva A, Salusjärvi T, Auvinen P, De Vos WM (2009) Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reveals pili containing a human-mucus binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:17193–17198
Kayaoglu G, Orstavik D (2004) Virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis: relationship to endodontic disease. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 15:308–320
King A, Bathgate T, Phillips I (2002) Erythromycin susceptibility of viridans streptococci from the normal throat flora of patients treated with azithromycin or clarithromycin. Clin Microbiol Infect 8:85–92
Launay A, Ballard SA, Johnson PDR, Grayson ML, Lambert T (2006) Transfer of vancomycin resistance transposon Tn1549 from Clostridium symbiosum to Enterococcus spp. in the gut of gnotobiotic mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:1054–1062
Lawrence JG (1999) Gene transfer, speciation, and the evolution of bacterial genomes. Curr Opin Microbiol 2:519–523
Lawson RD, Coyle WJ (2010) The noncolonic microbiome: does it really matter? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 12:259–262
Le Marrec C, Hyronimus B, Bressollier P, Verneuil B, Urdaci MC (2000) Biochemical and genetic characterization of coagulin, a new antilisterial bacteriocin in the pediocin family of bacteriocins, produced by Bacillus coagulans I4. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5213–5220
Licht TR, Laugesen D, Jensen LB, Jacobsen BL (2002) Transfer of the pheromone-inducible plasmid pCF10 among Enterococcus faecalis microorganisms colonizing the intestine of mini-pigs. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:187–193
Lim S, Tanimoto K, Tomita H, Ike Y (2006) Pheromone-responsive conjugative vancomycin resistance plasmids in Enterococcus faecalis isolates from humans and chicken feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:6544–6553
Lopes MDFS, Simões AP, Tenreiro R, Marques JJF, Crespo MTB (2006) Activity and expression of a virulence factor, gelatinase, in dairy enterococci. Int J Food Microbiol 112:208–214
Macovei L, Zurek L (2006) Ecology of antibiotic resistance genes: characterization of enterococci from houseflies collected in food settings. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4028–4035
Mahillon J, Chandler M (1998) Insertion sequences. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:725–774
Maisonneuve S, Ouriet MF, Duval-Iflah Y (2001) Comparison of yoghurt, heat treated yoghurt, milk and lactose effects on plasmid dissemination in gnotobiotic mice. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 79:199–207
Majewski J, Zawadzki P, Pickerill P, Cohan FM, Dowson CG (2000) Barriers to genetic exchange between bacterial species: Streptococcus pneumoniae transformation. J Bacteriol 182:1016–1023
Makarova KS, Koonin EV (2007) Evolutionary genomics of lactic acid bacteria. J Bacteriol 189:1199–1208
Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, Mirkin B, Koonin E, Pavlov A, Pavlova N, Karamychev V, Polouchine M, Shakhova V, Grigoriev I, Lou Y, Rohksar D, Lucas S, Huang K, Goodstein DM, Hawkins T, Plengvidhya V, Welker D, Hughes J, Goh Y, Benson A, Baldwin K, Lee J, Díaz-Muñiz I, Dosti B, Smeianov V, Wechter W, Barabote R, Lorca G, Altermann E, Barrangou R, Ganesan B, Xie Y, Rawsthorne H, Tamir D, Parker C, Breidt F, Broadbent J, Hutkins R, O’Sullivan D, Steele J, Unlu G, Saier M, Klaenhammer T, Richardson P, Kozyavkin S, Weimer B, Mills D (2006) Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:15611–15616
Makinen P, Clewell DB, An F, Makinen KK (1989) Purification and substrate specificity of a strongly hydrophobic extracellular metalloendopeptidase (‘gelatinase’) from Streptococcus faecalis (strain 0G1–10). J Biol Chem 264:3325–3334
Maragkoudakis PA, Zoumpopoulou G, Miaris C, Kalantzopoulos G, Pot B, Tsakalidou E (2006) Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy products. Int Dairy J 16:189–199
Mater DDG, Langella P, Corthier G, Flores MJ (2005) Evidence of vancomycin resistance gene transfer between enterococci of human origin in the gut of mice harbouring human microbiota. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:975–978
Mater DDG, Langella P, Corthier G, Flores MJ (2008) A probiotic Lactobacillus strain can acquire vancomycin resistance during digestive transit in mice. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 14:123–127
Mathur S, Singh R (2005) Antibiotic resistance in food lactic acid bacteria—a review. Int J Food Microbiol 105:281–295
Mattila-Sandholm T, Mättö J, Saarela M (1999) Lactic acid bacteria with health claims—interactions and interference with gastrointestinal flora. Int Dairy J 9:25–35
McAuliffe O, Cano RJ, Klaenhammer TR (2005) Genetic analysis of two bile salt hydrolase activities in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4925–4929
Miller KW, Ray P, Steinmetz T, Hanekarnp T, Ray B (2005) Gene organization and sequences of pediocin AcH/PA-1 production operons in Pediococcus and Lactobacillus plasmids. Lett Appl Microbiol 40:56–62
Mojica FJM, Díez-Villaseñor C, Soria E, Juez G (2000) Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of Archaea, Bacteria and mitochondria. Mol Microbiol 36:244–246
Mora D, Fortina MG, Parini C, Manachini PL (2000) PCR-mediated site-directed mutagenesis on pedB gene and HaeIII restriction as a rapid tool for discrimination among pediocin AcH/PA-1 producer strains. Food Microbiol 17:415–420
Morelli L, Sarra PG, Bottazzi V (1988) In vivo transfer of pAMβ1 from Lactobacillus reuteri to Enterococcus faecalis. J Appl Bacteriol 65:371–375
Morelli L, Vogensen FK, von Wright A (2004) Genetics of lactic acid bacteria. In: Salminen S, von Wright A, Ouwehand A (eds) Lactic acid bacteria. Microbiological and functional aspects. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
Moubareck C, Bourgeois N, Courvalin P, Doucet-Populaire F (2003) Multiple antibiotic resistance gene transfer from animal to human enterococci in the digestive tract of gnotobiotic mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:2993–2996
Mundy LM, Sahm DF, Gilmore M (2000) Relationships between enterococcal virulence and antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 13:513–522
Murray BE (1990) The life and times of the Enterococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev 3:46–65
Navarre WW, Schneewind O (1999) Surface proteins of gram-positive bacteria and mechanisms of their targeting to the cell wall envelope. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:174–229
Nicolas P, Bessières P, Ehrlich SD, Maguin E, van de Guchte M (2007) Extensive horizontal transfer of core genome genes between two Lactobacillus species found in the gastrointestinal tract. BMC Evol Biol 7:141–154
Nicoloff H, Bringel F (2003) ISLpl1 Is a Functional IS30-Related Insertion Element in Lactobacillus plantarum that Is Also Found in Other Lactic Acid Bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6032–6040
Ochman H, Lawrence JG, Groisman EA (2000) Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature 405:299–304
Pecharki D, Petersen FC, Scheie AA (2008) Role of hyaluronidase in Streptococcus intermedius biofilm. Microbiology 154:932–938
Pfeiler EA, Klaenhammer TR (2007) The genomics of lactic acid bacteria. Trends Microbiol 15:546–553
Qin X, Singh KV, Weinstock GM, Murray BE (2001) Characterization of fsr, a regulator controlling expression of gelatinase and serine protease in Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. J Bacteriol 183:3372–3382
Rice LB, Carias L, Rudin S, Vael C, Goossens H, Konstabel C, Klare I, Nallapareddy SR, Huang W, Murray BE (2003) A potential virulence gene, hyl Efm, predominates in Enterococcus faecium of clinical origin. J Infect Dis 187:508–512
Salminen S, Playne M, Lee YK (2004) Successful probiotic lactobacilli: Human studies on probiotic efficacy. In: Shortt C, O’Brien J (eds) Handbook of functional dairy products. CRC Press, New York
Salyers AA, Gupta A, Wang Y (2004) Human intestinal bacteria as reservoirs for antibiotic resistance genes. Trends Microbiol 12:412–416
Schmidt H, Hensel M (2004) Pathogenicity islands in bacterial pathogenesis. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:14–56
Scott KP (2002) The role of conjugative transposons in spreading antibiotic resistance between bacteria that inhabit the gastrointestinal tract. Cell Mol Life Sci 59:2071–2082
Shah NP (2007) Functional cultures and health benefits. Int Dairy J 17:1262–1277
Shankar V, Baghdayan AS, Huycke MM, Lindahl G, Gilmore MS (1999) Infection-derived Enterococcus faecalis strains are enriched in esp, a gene encoding a novel surface protein. Infect Immun 67:193–200
Shankar N, Coburn P, Pilla C, Haas W, Gilmore M (2004) Enterococcal cytolysin: activities and association with other virulence traits in a pathogenicity island. Int J Med Microbiol 293:609–618
Shugart LR, Beck RW (1964) Purification and activity of proteinase of Streptococcus faecalis Var. liquefaciens. J Bacteriol 88:586–590
Siezen RJ, Renckens B, Van Swam I, Peters S, Van Kranenburg R, Kleerebezem M, De Vos WM (2005) Complete sequences of four plasmids of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris SK11 reveal extensive adaptation to the dairy environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8371–8382
Sillanpää J, Nallapareddy SR, Prakash VP, Qin X, Höök M, Weinstock GM, Murray BE (2008) Identification and phenotypic characterization of a second collagen adhesin, Scm, and genome-based identification and analysis of 13 other predicted MSCRAMMs, including four distinct pilus loci, in Enterococcus faecium. Microbiology 154:3199–3211
Sillanpää J, Nallapareddy SR, Houston J, Ganesh VK, Bourgkogne A, Singh KV, Murray BE, Höök M (2009a) A family of fibrinogen-binding MSCRAMMs from Enterococcus faecalis. Microbiology 155:2390–2400
Sillanpää J, Prakash VP, Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE (2009b) Distribution of genes encoding MSCRAMMs and pili in clinical and natural populations of Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 47:896–901
Slover CM (2008) Lactobacillus: a Review. Clin Microbiol Newsl 30:23–27
Sorek R, Zhu Y, Creevey CJ, Francino MP, Bork P, Rubin EM (2007) Genome-wide experimental determination of barriers to horizontal gene transfer. Science 318:1449–1452
Sørensen SJ, Bailey M, Hansen LH, Kroer N, Wuertz S (2005) Studying plasmid horizontal transfer in situ: a critical review. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:700–710
Starr CR, Engleberg NC (2006) Role of hyaluronidase in subcutaneous spread and growth of group A streptococcus. Infect Immun 74:40–48
Su YA, Sulavik MC, He P, Makinen KK, Makinen PL, Fiedler S, Wirth R, Clewell DB (1991) Nucleotide sequence of the gelatinase gene (gelE) from Enterococcus faecalis subsp. liquefaciens. Infect Immun 59:415–420
Tamime A (2005) Probiotic dairy products. Blackwell, Oxford
Tanaka H, Hashiba H, Kok J, Mierau I (2000) Bile salt hydrolase of Bifidobacterium longum - Biochemical and genetic characterization. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2502–2512
Teng F, Kawalec M, Weinstock GM, Hryniewicz W, Murray BE (2003) An Enterococcus faecium secreted antigen, SagA, exhibits broad-spectrum binding to extracellular matrix proteins and appears essential for E. faecium growth. Infect Immun 71:5033–5041
Teuber M, Meile L, Schwarz F (1999) Acquired antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria from food. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 76:115–137
Thomas CM, Nielsen KM (2005) Mechanisms of, and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:711–721
Tian Y, He X, Torralba M, Yooseph S, Nelson KE, Lux R, McLean JS, Yu G, Shi W (2010) Using DGGE profiling to develop a novel culture medium suitable for oral microbial communities. Mol Oral Microbiol 25:357–367
Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2009) Bacteriocin production by Pediococcus pentosaceus isolated from marula (Scerocarya birrea). Int J Food Microbiol 132:117–126
Tønjum T, Håvarstein LS, Koomey M, Seeberg E (2004) Transformation and DNA repair: linkage by DNA recombination. Trends Microbiol 12:1–4
Tortorello ML, Dunny GM (1985) Identification of multiple cell surface antigens associated with the sex pheromone response of Streptococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 162:131–137
Tortorello M, Adsit J, Krug D (1986) Monoclonal antibodies to cell surface antigens involved in sex pheromone induced mating in Streptococcus faecalis. J Gen Microbiol 132:857–864
Van Reenen CA, Chikindas ML, Van Zyl WH, Dicks LMT (2003) Characterization and heterologous expression of a class IIa bacteriocin, plantaricin 423 from Lactobacillus plantarum 423, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Food Microbiol 81:29–40
Vankerckhoven V, Huys G, Vancanneyt M, Vael C, Klare I, Romond M, Entenza JM, Moreillon P, Wind RD, Knol J, Wiertz E, Pot B, Vaughan EE, Kahlmeter G, Goossens H (2008) Biosafety assessment of probiotics used for human consumption: recommendations from the EU-PROSAFE project. Trends Food Sci Technol 19:102–114
Vesterlund S, Vankerckhoven V, Saxelin M, Goossens H, Salminen S, Ouwehand AC (2007) Safety assessment of Lactobacillus strains: presence of putative risk factors in faecal, blood and probiotic isolates. Int J Food Microbiol 116:325–331
Yasmin A, Kenny JG, Shankar J, Darby AC, Hall N, Edwards C, Horsburgh MJ (2010) Comparative genomics and transduction potential of Enterococcus faecalis temperate bacteriophages. J Bacteriol 192:1122–1130
Zhang H, DiBaise JK, Zuccolo A, Kudrna D, Braidotti M, Yu Y, Parameswaran P, Crowell MD, Wing R, Rittmann BE, Krajmalnik-Brown R (2009) Human gut microbiota in obesity and after gastric bypass. PNAS 106:2365–2370
Zhou JS, Pillidge CJ, Gopal PK, Gill HS (2005) Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of new probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains. Int J Food Microbiol 98:211–217
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Reenen, C.A., Dicks, L.M.T. Horizontal gene transfer amongst probiotic lactic acid bacteria and other intestinal microbiota: what are the possibilities? A review. Arch Microbiol 193, 157–168 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-010-0668-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-010-0668-3