Abstract
MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains are isolated from clinical specimens with increasing frequency. It seems that acquiring genes which determine antibiotic resistance usually comes at a biological cost of impaired bacterial physiology. There is no information on investigations comparing phenotypic differences in MDR and MDS P. aeruginosa strains in literature. The study included 150 clinical P. aeruginosa isolates (75 classified as MDS and 75 as MDR). PFGE analysis revealed five pairs of identical isolates in the group of MDR strains and the results obtained for these strains were not included in the statistical analyses. MDR strains adhered to polystyrene to a lesser extent than MDS strains. The growth rate in the liquid medium was significantly lower for MDR strains. Detectable amounts of alginate were present in the culture supernatants of seven MDS and six MDR strains. The MDR P. aeruginosa strains which were investigated produced significantly lower amounts of extracellular material binding Congo Red, lower lipolytic, elastase, LasA protease, phospholipase C activity and pyocyanin quantity in culture supernatants when compared with MDS strains. No significant differences were observed between MDR and MDS strains in proteolytic activity. In conclusion, the MDR P. aeruginosa strains have impaired virulence when compared to MDS strains.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains have been isolated all over the world from clinical specimens with increasing frequency (D’Agata 2004; Lambiase et al. 2006; Navon-Venezia et al. 2005; Sánchez et al. 2002). Currently, there are no perspectives for introducing new drugs that could be used against this nosocomial pathogen (Landman et al. 2002), therefore investigations into its physiology are justified as they may lead to the discovery of new therapeutic opportunities.
It seems that acquiring genes which determine antibiotic resistance usually comes at a biological cost of impaired bacterial physiology (Andersson 2006; Andersson and Levin 1999; Spratt 1996), regardless whether the genes had been acquired in vivo (Schrag and Perrot 1996) or in vitro (Sánchez et al. 2002). Correlation between antibiotic resistance and virulence expression is not a new issue; it seems to be a task quite rarely undertaken when compared with those concerning antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation and epidemiology of infections caused by P. aeruginosa. Acquisition of multidrug-resistance genes may also affect bacterial quorum sensing that controls gene expression and the release of some virulence factors (Linares et al. 2005; Sánchez et al. 2002; Köhler et al. 2001).
From the evolutionary standpoint, the selection of MDR has been taking place for quite a short time—since the 1940s. Experimental studies have proved that MDR microorganisms, when in the presence of selective agents preserving the antibiotic resistance genes, are able to recover their previous levels of fitness during several hundreds of passages (Schoustra et al. 2006; Schrag and Perrot 1996). Some authors suggest that P. aeruginosa strains may accumulate drug resistance genes and are still able to cause bacteremia in humans (Hocquet et al. 2007).
No information on investigations comparing phenotypic differences in the expression of virulence factors in MDR and multidrug-sensitive (MDS) P. aeruginosa clinical strains can be found in literature.
Materials and methods
The study included 150 clinical P. aeruginosa isolates. Seventy-five of them were classified as MDS (sensitive to most of the tested antibiotics), and 75 as MDR, on the basis of contemporary definitions of multidrug resistance (Deplano et al. 2005; Navon-Venezia et al. 2005; Schina et al. 2006; Hill et al. 2005; Tam et al. 2005; Obritsch et al. 2004; Hsu et al. 2005). All strains were isolated in the Department of Microbiology of the Dr. A. Jurasz University Hospital between 2000 and 2005. Strains isolated from the same patient were not included in the study.
The strains were identified by routine methods used in clinical microbiology. The antibiotic sensitivity tests were performed according to the current recommendations of National Committee for Clinical and Laboratory Standards (2004) and National Reference Centre for Anitmicrobial Sensitivity Testing (Hryniewicz et al. 2004) using disk diffusion. The MIC values for selected antibiotics were determined with Etest (AB Biodisk).
PFGE analysis of genomic profiles was adapted from the procedure published by Jung et al. (2002). The optimal time of incubation with 1 ml of 0.5 M EDTA solution, pH = 9.5 was established at 15 min at room temperature. Isolated chromosomal DNA was digested with SpeI enzyme in Tango Buffer (Fermentas) at final concentration of 40 U ml−1 for 20 h at 37°C. The results were analysed using the Molecular Analyst Fingerprint software (Dice coefficient, position tolerance 1.5%). Strains indicating over 96% similarity were considered as identical and were not included in further analyses.
Evaluation of selected virulence factors
The strains were cultured in 2% Proteose Peptone (PP, Oxoid) for 20 h at 37°C with intensive shaking. The cultures were then centrifuged (3,000g/10 min). The supernatants were divided into 1 ml portions, frozen at −70°C and used for further analyses. The pellets were washed twice with 3 ml of PBS (pH 7.4), then resuspended in 3 ml of PBS in order to measure the optical density (OD) at microplate reader (Synergy HT, BioTek) λ = 480 nm. The OD was used to normalize the results of exoproducts activity of supernatants and as a measure of the growth rate. P. aeruginosa PAO1 strain had been used in all experiments as a control. The strain was kindly provided by prof. Fiona Brinkman and prof. Bob Hancock.
Proteolytic activity was examined using the method described by Sieprawska-Lupa et al. (2004) with asocaseine (Sigma) as a substrate. The experiment was carried out in triplicate. The results were expressed in mg l−1 on the basis of standard curve obtained with bacterial proteinase (Sigma).
Elastase activity was estimated using the method described by Grimwood et al. (1989) using elastin-Congo red conjugate (Sigma) as a substrate. Elastase activity (mg ml−1) was established using the standard curve based on elastase solution (Sigma).
LasA protease activity was evaluated directly as described by Ołdak and Trafny (2005) with boiled S. aureus cells as a substrate.
Lipolytic activity was evaluated using the method described by Lonon et al. (1988). The results were expressed in U defined as an enzymatic activity that increases the OD of the sample of 0.001 during 2 h incubation.
Phospholipase C activity was evaluated using the method described by Kurioka and Matsuda (1976) with p-nitrophenylphosphorylocholine (Sigma) as a substrate. The results were established on the basis of the standard curve obtained from the reaction with Clostridium perfringens phospholipase C (Sigma), and expressed in U ml−1.
Alginate assay was performed using the borate-carbazole method developed by Knutson and Jeanes (1968) with further modifications (Bagge et al. 2004). The concentration of alginate was established on the basis of the standard curve obtained from the reaction with alginic acid sodium salt (Sigma) solution.
Pyocyanin production was quantified using the spectrophotometric method described by Dietrich et al. (2006).
Polystyrene adhesion assay was performed using the method described by Chirstensen et al. (1985) with some modifications (Jackson et al. 2004). Sterile PP medium was used as a negative control. The experiment was carried out in triplicate. The results were averaged.
Congo red binding assay was applied to measure the extracellular slime production using the method described by Ishiguro et al. (1985) with some modifications. The pellet obtained from the cultures grown during 20 h at 37°C in PP was resuspended in PBS, pH 7.4, 500 μl of obtained suspensions was placed in Eppendorf tube, and 500 μl of Congo red (Sigma) solution (150 μg ml−1) was added. The mixtures were shaken intensively at 1400 RPM for 5 min, and subsequently centrifuged (13500 RPM/10 min). The supernatants were placed in the microplate wells and the OD was measured at Synergy HT microplate reader (wavelength λ = 570 nm). The negative control used in the experiment was a mixture of 500 μl PBS and 500 μl of Congo red solution. The results were divided by the suspension OD.
Statistical analyses were performed with Statistica 6.0 PL (Statsoft). Non-parametric U-Mann–Witney’s test was used, with the significance level p < 0.05. Results for both groups of strains are presented as averages with standard deviation (SD) range.
Results and discussion
The strains included in the study were isolated from urine (42.7% MDS and 34.7% MDR); wound swabs (17.3% MDS and 22.7% MDR); tracheal secretion (14.7% MDS and 17.3% MDR) BAL (10.7% MDR and 10.7% MDS); blood cultures (1.3% MDS and 2.7% MDR) and other clinical specimens (13.3% MDS and 12.0% MDR). Their antibiotic susceptibility rates are presented in Table 1.
PFGE analysis revealed five pairs of closely related isolates in the group of MDR strains, and the results obtained for these strains were removed from further analyses. All isolates in the group of MDS strains were unrelated.
MDR strains adhered to polystyrene to a lesser extent than MDS strains (0.111 vs. 0.130; p = 0.005; PAO1 = 0.277) expressed in OD units (Fig. 1). Some authors have indicated that MDR A. baumannii isolates strongly adhered to polystyrene and epithelial cells (Lee et al. 2008). Investigations over MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae strains show strong adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells (Di Martino et al. 1997). The adhesive properties depended on the antibiotic resistance profile of these strains.
The growth rate in the liquid medium was significantly lower for MDR strains (0.924 OD) than for the MDS strains (1.234 OD); p < 0.001 (Fig. 2), whereas for PAO1 strain, it was 1.421. Kugelberg et al. (2004) obtained similar results investigating P. aeruginosa strains resistant to fluoroquinolones. Also MDR Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains grow slower than MDS strains (Toro et al. 2006).
Detectable amounts of alginate were present in the culture supernatants of 7 (9.3%) MDS and 6 (8.0%) MDR strains and the differences were statistically irrelevant. Testing the alginate synthesis using other methods or in different conditions should be considered. However, some authors suggest that alginate is not a significant component of P. aeruginosa biofilms (Wozniak et al. 2003) and its overproduction may affect both the biofilm’s structure as well as its function (Hentzer et al. 2001).
The MDR P. aeruginosa strains which were investigated produced lower amounts of extracellular material binding Congo Red. Congo red binding index equalled 0.224 OD for MDR strains, while for MDS strains it equalled 0.284 OD and for PAO1 −0.154. The differences were statistically relevant (p = 0.02).
No statistically significant differences were observed between MDR and MDS strains tested in proteolytic activity of culture supernatants (1.983 mg l−1; SD = 2.573 vs. 2.562 mg l−1; SD = 4.418; PAO1 = 3.754). Sánchez et al. (2002) indicated that laboratory mutants overexpressing nalB and nfxB efflux pumps produce significantly lower proteolytic activity when compared with wild-type strain. Authors stress that the influence of drug resistance mediating genes acquisition in vivo may lead to different biological activity than in mutants obtained in laboratory.
Lower activity of elastase was observed in the supernatants of MDR P. aeruginosa strains when compared with the MDS strains (3.451 mg l−1; SD = 6.711 vs. 7.511 mg l−1; SD = 11.001; PAO1 −15.2 mg l−1); p < 0.01. Lower activity of LasA protease was also observed in MDR strains supernatants (1.15 U ml−1, SD = 3.97 vs. 0.9 ml−1, SD = 1.22; PAO1 −3.41 U ml−1); p < 0.001. Sánchez et al. (2002) indicated that laboratory obtained mutants of P. aeruginosa strains overexpressing efflux pumps, produced lower amounts of elastase. They indicate that in vivo selection may lead to other genetic changes and other changes of virulence factors profile. Cowell et al. (2003) investigated PAO1 knock-out mutants, without lasA and/or lasB genes. Their results showed that the presence of lasB gene correlates stronger with P. aeruginosa virulence rabbit corneal epithelium model than the presence of lasA gene. These authors claim that the elastolytic activity is the main cause of P. aeruginosa virulence. Both, LasB (elastase) and LasA proteases are known to be controlled by two quorum-sensing systems (las and rhl) virulence factors. Further investigations may elucidate if lower expression of these proteases is caused by altered las and rhl signalling systems due to multidrug resistance. Bratu et al. (2006) indicated that the enhanced expression of las and rhl quorum-sensing systems leads to increased production of elastase and pyocyanin. It did not, however, influence the increase in antimicrobial resistance. The MDR strains included in our study usually presented different mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance.
Lack of differences in proteolytic activity of supernatants with differences in LasA and elastase activity may be a result of specificity of substrates used in the study. Azocasein is a substrate used to evaluate total proteolytic activity which may be a sum of activities of many different proteases found in P. aeruginosa strains (i.e. LasA, LasB, alkaline protease, elastase A and B and type IV protease). The MDR strains might have enhanced activity of other proteases, which were not tested in the study, so that lower LasA and elastase activity did not affect the total proteolytic activity in the protease assay.
In the culture supernatants of MDR P. aeruginosa strains, lower lipolytic activity was observed: (38.191 U ml−1; SD = 24.484) versus (47.254 U ml−1; SD = 21.95). These differences were statistically significant, p < 0.001. PAO1 supernatants reached the activity of 28 U ml−1. There is no information on differences between MDR and MDS bacterial strains in lipase production in relevant literature.
MDR strains expressed lower phospholipase C activity in culture supernatants than MDS strains (0.580 U ml−1; SD = 0.556 vs. 2.139 U ml−1; SD = 6.691; PAO1 −0.436 U ml−1). The differences observed were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Such differences had not been reported elsewhere.
Pyocyanin synthesis was present in 33 (44.4%) MDS and 31 (41.3%) MDR strains. MDR strains produced less pyocyanin than MDS strains (24.98 μmol l−1, SD = 85.85 vs. 47.53 μmol l−1, SD = 63.2; PAO1 −53.2 μmol l−1) p < 0.001. Pyocyanin is a redox-active pigment that plays an important role in P. aeruginosa infections (Ran et al. 2003). Its synthesis in bacterial cell is under influence of quorum-sensing system (Bratu et al. 2006; Dietrich et al. 2006). Some epidemic strains had been described as pyocyanin and LasA protease overproducers, which is quite an unusual phenotype (Fothergill et al. 2007).
In conclusion, we found that when compared with MDS strains, the MDR P. aeruginosa strains have impaired virulence in vitro study mainly as a result of slow growth and reduced expression of some exoenzymes and pyocyanin. Further studies using molecular biology methods and possible correlation to quorum-sensing alterations in MDR strains are necessary to confirm these observations.
Abbreviations
- MDS:
-
Multidrug sensitive
- MDR:
-
Multidrug resistant
- OD:
-
Optical density
References
Andersson DI (2006) The biological cost of mutational antibiotic resistance: any practical conclusions? Curr Opin Microbiol 9:461–465
Andersson DI, Levin BR (1999) The biological cost of antibiotic resistance. Curr Opin Microbiol 2:489–493
Bagge N, Schuster M, Hentzer M, Ciofu O, Givskov M, Greenberg E, Hoiby N (2004) Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms exposed to imipenem exhibit changes in global gene expression and ß-lactamase and alginate production. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:1175–1187
Bratu S, Gupta J, Quale J (2006) Expression of the las and rhl quorum-sensing systems in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa does not correlate with efflux pump expression or antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 58:1250–1253
Chirstensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, Baddour LM, Barrett FF, Melton DM, Beachey EH (1985) Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates a quantitative model for adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 22:996–1006
Cowell BA, Twinnig SS, Hobden JA, Kwong MS, Fleiszig SM (2003) Mutation of lasA and lasB reduces Pseudomonas aeruginosa invasion of epithelial cells. Microbiology 149:2291–2299
D’Agata EM (2004) Rapidly rising prevalence of nosocomial multidrug-resistant, Gram-negative bacilli: a 9-year surveillance study. Infect Cotrol Hosp Epidemiol 25:824–826
Deplano A, Denis O, Poirel L, Hocquet D, Nonhoff C, Nordman P, Vincent JL, Struelens MJ (2005) Molecular characterization of an epidemic clone of panantibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Clin Mircobiol 43:1198–1204
Di Martino P, Sirot D, Joly B, Rich C, Darfeuille-Michaud A (1997) Relationship between adhesion to intestinal Caco-2 cells and multidrug resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. J Clin Microbiol 35:1499–1503
Dietrich LE, Price-Whelan A, Petersen A, Whiteley M, Newman DK (2006) The phenazine pyocyanin is a terminal signalling factor in the quorum sensing network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol 61:1308–1321
Fothergill JL, Panagea S, Hart CA, Walshaw MJ, Pitt TL, Winstanley C (2007) Widespread pyocyanin over-production among isolates of a cystic fibrosis epidemic strains. BMC Microbiol 23; 7:45
Grimwood K, To M, Rabin HR, Woods DE (1989) Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme expression by subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 33:41–47
Hentzer M, Teitzel GM, Balzer GJ (2001) Alginate overproduction affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm structure and function. J Bacteriol 183:5395–5401
Hill D, Rose B, Pajkos A, Robinson M, Bye P, Bell S, Elkins M, Thompson B, Macleod C, Aaron SD, Harbour C (2005) Antibiotic susceptabilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates derived from patients with cystic fibrosis under aerobic, anaerobic and biofilm conditions. J Clin Microbiol 43:5085–5090
Hocquet D, Berthelot P, Roussel-Delvallez M, Favre R, Jeannot K, Bajolet O, Marty N, Grattard F, Mariani-Kurkdjian P, Bingen E, Husson MO, Couetdic G, Plésiat P (2007) Pseudomonas aeruginosa may accumulate drug resistance mechanism without losing its ability to cause bloodstream infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:3531–3536
Hryniewicz W, Sulikowska A, Szczypa K, Krzysztoń-Russjan J, Gniadkowski M, Skoczyńska A (2004) Recommendations for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Mikrob Med 40:3–28
Hsu DI, Okamoto MP, Murthy R, Wong-Beringer A (2005) Fluoroquinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: risk factors for acquisition and impact on outcomes. J Anitmicr Chemother 55:535–541
Ishiguro E, Ainsworth T, Trust TJ, Kay WW (1985) Congo red agar, a differential medium for Aeromonas salmonicida, detects the presence of the cell surface protein array involved in virulence. J Bacteriol 164:1233–1237
Jackson KD, Starkey M, Kremer S, Parsek MR, Wozniak DJ (2004) Identification of psl, a locus encoding a potential exopolysaccharide that is essential for Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm formation. J Bacteriol 186:4466–4475
Jung A, Kleinau I, Schonian G, Bauerfeind A, Chen C, Griese M, Doring G, Gobel U, Wahn U, Paul K (2002) Sequential genotyping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from upper and lower airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Eur Respir J 20:1457–1463
Knutson CA, Jeanes A (1968) A new modification of the carbazole analysis application to heteropolysaccharides. Anal Biochem 24:470–481
Köhler T, van Delden C, Curty LK, Hamzehpour MM, Pechere JC (2001) Overexpression of the MexEF-OprN multidrug efflux system affects cell-to-cell signaling in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 183:5213–5222
Kugelberg E, Löfmark S, Wretlind B, Andersson DI (2004) Reduction of the fitness burden of quinolone resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:22–30
Kurioka S, Matsuda M (1976) Phospholipase C assay using p-nitrophenyl-phosphorylocholine together with sorbitol and its application to studying metal requirement of the enzyme. Anal Biochem 75:281–289
Lambiase A, Raia V, Del Pezzo M, Sepe A, Carnovale V, Rossano F (2006) Microbiology of airway disease in a cohort of patients with cystic fibrosis. BMC Infect Dis. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-6-4
Landman D, Quale JM, Mayorga D, Adedeji A, Vangala K, Racishankar J, Flores C, Brooks C (2002) Citywide clonal outbreak of multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Brooklyn, NY. The preantibiotic era has returned. Arch Intern Med 162:1515–1520
Lee HW, Koh YM, Kim J, Lee JC, Lee YC, Seol SY, Cho DT, Kim J (2008) Capacity of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii to form biofilm and adhere to epithelial cell surfaces. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:49–54
Linares JF, López JA, Camafeita E, Albar JP, Rojo F, Martínez JL (2005) Overexpression of the multidrug efflux pumps MexCD-OprJ and MexEF-OprN is associated with a reduction of type III secretion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 187:1384–1391
Lonon MK, Woods DE, Straus D (1988) Production of lipase by clinical isolates of Pseudomonas cepacia. J Clin Microbiol 26:979–984
Navon-Venezia S, Ben-Ami R, Carmeli Y (2005) Update on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii infections in the healthcare setting. Curr Opin Infect Dis 18:306–313
NCCLS (2004) Performance standards for standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; fourteenth edition. M100-S14
Obritsch MD, Fish DN, MacLaren R, Jung R (2004) National surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from intensive care unit patients from 1993 to 2002. Anitmicrob Agents Chemother 48:4606–4610
Ołdak E, Trafny EA (2005) Secretion of proteases by Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms exposed to ciprofloxacin. Anitmicrob Agents Chemother 49:3281–3288
Ran H, Hasset DJ, Lau GW (2003) Human targets of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyocyanin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:14315–14320
Sánchez P, Linares JF, Ruiz-Díez B, Campanario E, Navas A, Baquero F, Martínez JL (2002) Fitnes of in vitro selected Pseudomonas aeruginosa nalB and nfxB multidrug resistant mutants. J Antimicrob Chemother 50:657–664
Schina M, Spyridi E, Daoudakis M, Mertzanos E, Korfias S (2006) Successful treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa meningitis with intravenous and intrathecal colistin. Int J Infect Dis 10:178–179
Schoustra SE, Debetes AJM, Slakhorst M, Hoekstra RF (2006) Reducing the cost of resistance; experimental evolution in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. J Evol Biol 19:1115–1127
Schrag SJ, Perrot V (1996) Reducing antibiotic resistance. Nature 381:120–121
Sieprawska-Lupa M, Mydel P, Krawczyk K, Wójcik K, Lupa B, Suder P, Silberring J, Reed M, Pohl J, Shafer W, McAleese F, Foster T, Travis J, Potempa J (2004) Degradation of human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 by Staphylococcus aureus-derived proteinases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:4673–4679
Spratt BG (1996) Antibiotic resistance: counting the cost. Curr Biol 6:1219–2000
Tam V, Schilling AN, Vo G, Kabbara S, Kwa AL, Weiderhold NP, Lewis RE (2005) Pharmacodynamics of polymyxin B against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:3624–3630
Toro JC, Hoffner S, Linde C, Andersson M, Andersson J, Frundstrom S (2006) Enhanced susceptibility of multidrug resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to granulysin peptides correlates with a reduced fitness phenotype. Microbes Infect 8:1985–1993
Wozniak DJ, Wyckoff TJ, Starkey M (2003) Alginate is not a significant component of the extracellular polysaccharide matrix of PA14 and PAO1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:7907–7912
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Sebastian Suerbaum.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deptuła, A., Gospodarek, E. Reduced expression of virulence factors in multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Arch Microbiol 192, 79–84 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-009-0528-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-009-0528-1